~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | Study finds that "manuscripts written by women as solo authors or coauthored by women were treated even more favorably by referees and editors" yet gets reported with the heading "no gender bias". Gender bias against men doesn't seem to count as gender bias!I am not the person to talk to if you think the paper is biased. I have no editoral control. I have made no claims regarding the paper's veracity; I simply presented the findings. Please direct your ire towards Science Advances, or the original authors of the paper. | /r/MensRights | 08/01/21 04:59 AM |
| 6 | Study finds that "manuscripts written by women as solo authors or coauthored by women were treated even more favorably by referees and editors" yet gets reported with the heading "no gender bias". Gender bias against men doesn't seem to count as gender bias!Why? You seem to want to argue with me about it, that's why. All I've done is tell you what the original paper said. If you disagree with the paper, write up why and send it to the journal, or one of the original authors. That's what papers are for. I'm just a guy sat in my pants. | /r/MensRights | 08/01/21 04:32 AM |
| 10 | Study finds that "manuscripts written by women as solo authors or coauthored by women were treated even more favorably by referees and editors" yet gets reported with the heading "no gender bias". Gender bias against men doesn't seem to count as gender bias!Again, go argue with the people who actually research and publish on gender descrimination in academia if you disagree with them. I'm just presenting the actual wording of the paper. | /r/MensRights | 08/01/21 04:10 AM |
| 15 | Study finds that "manuscripts written by women as solo authors or coauthored by women were treated even more favorably by referees and editors" yet gets reported with the heading "no gender bias". Gender bias against men doesn't seem to count as gender bias!Previous research suggests that women could be inclined to invest more in their manuscripts to prevent expected editorial bias (10, 33), which could also explain why they submit fewer manuscripts (18, 23, 24, 28). I mean, go look up their citations if you want to argue with them. That's why they gave them. | /r/MensRights | 08/01/21 03:43 AM |
| 43 | Study finds that "manuscripts written by women as solo authors or coauthored by women were treated even more favorably by referees and editors" yet gets reported with the heading "no gender bias". Gender bias against men doesn't seem to count as gender bias!From what I can gather from the actual study itself, here, papers submitted by women have a very slightly higher chance of being accepted by Journals. One of the suggested reasons for this is that women submitting the papers think they need to work harder on the papers before submitting them in the first place, because there's a percieved bias. The actual differences in acceptance rates are minor, see this figure (larger blocks of colour show a greater proportion of submitted papers, lack of bia… | /r/MensRights | 08/01/21 03:29 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter