TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

The_Warlock_VDS Archive

View 0 posts and 22 comments by The_Warlock_VDS on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Well, some time for articulate thinking has passed. Perhaps your have forgotten about my post. Care to retort?
/r/TheRedPill21/05/20 09:04 PM
1

Generally false. If men are more likely to develop NPD, then they are by correlation more likely to be narcissistic in character, especially considering that narcissism concerns multiple facets of one's personality. As a reminder: Narcissistic personality disorder is characterized by a long-standing pattern of grandiosity (either in fantasy or actual behavior), an overwhelming need for admiration, and usually a complete lack of empathy toward others. Source. If it just makes you another stuck up…
/r/TheRedPill21/05/20 08:42 PM
1

I think it is true that many women are narcissistic to a degree. This is wrong. Prevalence of lifetime NPD was 6.2%, with rates greater for men (7.7%) than for women (4.8%)... [Experts conclude] NPD is a prevalent personality disorder in the general U.S. population and is associated with considerable disability among men, whose rates exceed those of women. Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18557663
/r/TheRedPill03/05/20 12:43 AM
1

all women [4,000,000,000 people(!)] are inherently solipsistic and the vast, vast majority narcissistic. Prevalence of lifetime NPD was 6.2%, with rates greater for men (7.7%) than for women (4.8%)... [Experts conclude] NPD is a prevalent personality disorder in the general U.S. population and is associated with considerable disability among men, whose rates exceed those of women. Source Besides intuition, statistics disprove your faulty premise, unless you have assigned an irrational definition…
/r/TheRedPill03/05/20 12:33 AM
1

Well said. While I am surely disappointed, I cannot express much surprise regarding this behaviour. For an ideology that upholds willpower and discipline the lot of Red Pillers resemble sheep, and their shephard the OP. I'm baffled by this entire forum's inability to grasp a simple concept, or perhaps their refusal to. As a youthful intellectual, I'd be beating myself for months remembering any daft rubbish I'd have posted here.
/r/RPChristians02/05/20 08:26 AM
1

I cannot even begin to decipher your bizarrely written comment. Were you perchance inebrated? The word toxic should not be thrown around as a label upon minor infractions or misunderstandings yet that's what this will do. Here it seems you're arguing against the semantics of the term "toxic positivity". I cannot understand what you're on about. People are going to be shamed just for not being depressed by angry folks who love terms like this to attack others. Same argument? They should just tell…
/r/RPChristians02/05/20 03:22 AM
1

Then you would understand that the article concerns 'toxic positivity' rather than strict 'positivity'. Am I correct?
/r/RPChristians02/05/20 02:47 AM
1

Read the article bucko.
/r/RPChristians02/05/20 01:39 AM
1

Read the article bucko.
/r/RPChristians02/05/20 01:39 AM
0

Read the article bucko.
/r/RPChristians02/05/20 01:38 AM
0

So, sunshine /u/RunawayGrain, are you dyslexic or a moron? Literally, within the first few paragraphs: Psychologists, who coined the term “toxic positivity,” point out that the mind-over-matter message isn’t always the right approach, especially when it ignores, suppresses or dismisses negative feelings caused by grief, trauma or mental illness. This means your Christian values of confidence and optimism are not causal with "toxic positivity". You have displayed one of the most pitiful, rock bot…
/r/RPChristians02/05/20 01:31 AM
1

Come on. Apply some sense to your argument. Promiscuity directly correlates with unfaithfulness among males and females alike. Put yourself in a mature woman's skin and examine this scenario: two perfectly identical men exist, but one has slept with many women while the other with but a few. High chances establish the latter as the ideal option. Why? Isn't your highly regarded concept of stoic inhibition attractive to women? Red Pillers seem to worship the notion. By your own principles, the for…
/r/TheRedPill02/05/20 12:40 AM
1

Your red pill theories are insufferably illogical and intellectually masturbatory. all women have NPD to a certain degree. They're all narcissists. Haha, what the fuck is this drivel? You have to be seriously deluded to think this. The fact that more men chase women then the reverse does not somehow diagnose half the world's population with a dangerous and debilitating disorder, even to a "minimal degree" (?!). You are clearly ignorant of mental disorders and adopt the egotistical approach of re…
/r/TheRedPill01/05/20 10:20 PM
2

What a load of drivel. This is a nonsensical double standard. How do women "submit" to a man's "reality"? What kind of bullshit is this? A woman doesn't have to "submit" to a man's "reality" to sleep with him. You probably think you're being hyper-precise but you are nothing close. Your pathetic 'argument' is nothing but a spewing of premises. This is a pure example of a pseudo-intellectual red piller. Try again.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/20 09:18 PM
4

This is just a bunch of nonsensical generalizations. You don't actually have any compelling arguments, just a silly list of premises. the Bible... every other effective leadership practice on the planet First off the Bible is big pile of rubbish and I have no idea what you mean by "effective leadership practice". Leader of the family and the buck stops with them...they don’t like that. Premise. start feeling like their spouse is “their third child”. Premise, generalization. Families let by men a…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/19 10:31 PM
1

Perhaps you haven't been to higher level academia (eg researchers), where woman are as intelligent if not more as men. Frankly I may be bias, as I believe the grand 90% of the human population are uninteresting fools, so I only talk to people worth my time.
/r/askTRP17/10/19 08:05 PM
1

Thank you very much for an actual argument being presented. As I am too busy to properly reply, I will try and get back to you within this week. By the way, work on your manners, as your lack of them makes you appear weak. Have a good one!
/r/askTRP17/10/19 07:28 PM
1

You too. Have a wonderful day.
/r/askTRP17/10/19 04:22 PM
-2

No matter how much poopoo and sad hypocritical insults you throw at me, it will never change the argument that shreds your shallow beliefs. Attack the argument and remain intellectually credible. As soon as you have attacked the person, you have already failed and pompously demonstrated your cultist mindset.
/r/askTRP17/10/19 03:24 PM
-2

I always notice that cultists, those of a pathetic, bitter, close-minded nature tend to ignore any rebuttal or logical argument and resort instead to logical fallacies. Realizing that you were wrong, your only preservation of the limited mindset that is the Red Pill was to become intellectually and morally dishonest. Thank you for providing a further example of the cultist mindset Redpillers have against truth and morality. And, by the way, I've probably had more sex than you. ;)
/r/askTRP17/10/19 02:56 PM
1

Human stupidity is universal, and is found among both males and females. Focusing on the problems with one sex over the other is ridiculous. Look around you. You're on the red pill, you're surrounded by idiots and egotists. Simple fact is there are as many intelligent women who arw enjoyable to talk to as there are men.
/r/askTRP17/10/19 12:48 PM
-6

What a bunch of nonsense. Congratulations on generalizing 3500000000 people, most of which are probably more intelligent and interesting than you.
/r/askTRP17/10/19 12:40 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter