TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

The_White_Baron Archive

View 0 posts and 79 comments by The_White_Baron on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-26

I'm not so sure this is true. I subscribe to /r/childfree, and you'll notice a majority of the posts are from disgruntled women being pressured to have kids.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 12:03 AM
2

Oh of course I'm not suggesting it was bad decisions. I totally get your feelings about it. I'm thinking more rationally. If she wasn't ready then it could have a significant negative impact on the child. You guys can discuss more and and wait if it's something you can forgive. Both parents should be ready. If it's not something you can forgive then find someone new. I'm not claiming these are easy choices to make. I'm just claiming these are the rational things to do.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 08:32 PM
2

Do her reasons for not wanting to continue the pregnancy matter to you? It's 9 months of incubation that she clearly doesnt want to do. If you want to be a father, let her be and find someone who wants to be a parent with you? I legit see no negatives to this, unless the guy doesn't care about the girl he knocked up and has such a narrow vision of his future he only sees a new baby, but not the time it takes for the woman to carry the pregnancy. I have a hard time seeing how you would be okay wi…
/r/MensRights07/02/18 06:57 PM
1

Abortion isn't even 100% effective I disagree? I've never heard of a case of an abortion not working
/r/MensRights07/02/18 06:42 PM
3

Haha I guess we just focused on different parts of the same argument. Cheers man
/r/MensRights07/02/18 03:27 PM
4

I've already admitted there is risk. And mentioned there are safeguards in place to mitigate that risk (birth control, condoms, sterilization, plan B/C, abortions), none of which (barring abortion) are 100% effective. These safeguards exist to preserve our right as humans to autonomy. Which sex is a part of. My argument is that when you forgo these safeguards and choose to have a kid anyway, then and only then do you forfeit your autonomy (in favor of the now new human kid). I'll be damned if I …
/r/MensRights07/02/18 02:58 PM
7

you forfeit the right to autonomy the moment you decide to have sex not just decide to make a child Disagree 100%. Sex is part of autonomy. There are safeguards in place to mitigate accidental and/or unwanted pregnancies. Not everyone has sex willingly or in the right state of mind. It's when you forgo these safeguards and have a kid that you forfeit autonomy, in favor of the kid. I deal with facts and actual things that happen, not what might happen. That's like saying you forfeit any right to …
/r/MensRights07/02/18 02:10 PM
4

It's much more nuanced than that. Consider all the possibilities. Neither wants to abort. Good! Though they both should be able to afford the child. Both want to abort. Good! She wants to abort and he doesn't. Her body, her choice. I'm fully in favor of this. If someone told me I had to incubate something in my body for 9 months with hormonal fluctuations, just to pawn it off for someone else, I'd tell them to fuck off. (Note I'm a guy). She doesn't want to abort but he does. Again, it's her bod…
/r/MensRights07/02/18 01:36 PM
6

How about Warren Farrell's assertion that men are money objects. Are you saying men want to be objectified by money? Women don't want to be objectified any more than men do. I don't think your rationale holds.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 04:25 AM
4

You didn't pose a question about equality, you posed a question about a right that a woman doesn't have. Since you edited you comment I'll respond. On paper it's shitty that men get shafted on abortions, and financial abortions seem like a nice idea. Something to consider though is that if he does financially abort the child, and the woman remains single, will she have enough money to properly raise the child? This is the courts logic. It's a lose lose situation, there's no way everybody comes o…
/r/MensRights22/01/18 01:25 AM
2

show me a study and then we can talk, because I know they ban men from certain procedures. A study about how more women are rejected for sterilisation? Really? Not providing a women with a abortion isn't a issue because women aren't entitled to the service, they are only entitled to seek it. Seriously? Women are 100% entitled to bodily autonomy, abortions included. Just because people don't want to provide you with it , isn't having your rights violated. Imagine a woman accidentally gets pregnan…
/r/MensRights22/01/18 01:17 AM
5

A young guy will have the same issues as a young women, and for good reason. You don't browse /r/childfree that often, do you? Because that's patently false. abortion is legal, it is up to them to acquire the funds, transportation and a willing doctor. So you admit there are roadblocks in place explicitly to make it more difficult for a woman to have an abortion?
/r/MensRights22/01/18 12:46 AM
-2

Probably because men don't bear fetuses.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 10:55 PM
3

Which ones? Can you provide a source? Because I haven't heard of that.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 10:38 PM
3

In many states, women will struggle to find a place to have an abortion done. While it is federally legal in all states, there are many road blocks put in place to make it more difficult. Another issue is sterilization. There is more social pressure on women to have families than for men. This makes doctors more reluctant to sterilize women. Now granted this isn't a rights issue per se, since they access to sterilizing procedures, it's just a little more difficult to have done as compared to a m…
/r/MensRights21/01/18 10:14 PM
4

Are those random numbers to make a point, or can you recall where you found them? It'd be nice to see at least one of the studies you referred to. Can you find them?
/r/MensRights12/01/18 04:03 PM
1

Great response, as usual. A very tiny, sightly tangential addition: On okcupid there are match questions people can fill out. Two of them: Is a man who has had over 100 sexual partners a bad person? Is a woman who has had over 100 sexual partners a bad person? I couldn't tell you how many answers were "yes, no". Interesting discrepancy.
/r/MensRights24/12/17 04:25 AM
16

That begs the immediate question: men and women make up a roughly 50/50 split in population. So why, then, are there so many individuals perpetuating these crimes from only one gender if the issue isn't the gender itself? At which point you're right back to square one and still have to have a response ready. Just devils advocate here
/r/MensRights20/12/17 04:22 PM
24

One quote of hers stuck out to me: when she mentioned people with mental health problems should be forcibly injected with meds, concluding it with "fuck human rights". A feminist, one who values women's rights, actively saying "fuck human rights" is beyond hypocritical. It's sick.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 05:17 PM
2

Thanks for occupying my morning. I'm gonna leave now, I'm gonna go bench press an elephant. Nice chatting with you
/r/MensRights04/12/17 02:55 PM
2

That doesn't seem to reflect your earlier arguments where you'd be willing to tell someone with a scar that they're mutilated. And that you'll probably get mutilated later. This is fair/consistent to FGM?
/r/MensRights04/12/17 02:48 PM
2

Because you opt to use the emotive word mutilate in lieu of the neutral word circumcise. I'll ask you point blank: why do you think the word circumcise is insufficient to describe the removal of foreskin on the penis? And why do you think mutilate is more descriptive?
/r/MensRights04/12/17 02:38 PM
1

You didn't, I assumed, and apparently incorrectly. I took a shot in the dark that most passionate people on this topic are circumcised. In that case, why do you feel so passionately about this topic?
/r/MensRights04/12/17 02:28 PM
1

I'll just leave you with the rest of my thoughts: my penis functions fine, from every vantage point I analyze it. Every woman I have been with has not reported an issue. So the only one saying there is a problem with my penis in this comment chain is you. If you feel there is something wrong with your penis, by all means. I don't feel there is anything wrong with mine, and you claim there is simply because 1) you're circumcised and feel mutilated and 2) I'm also circumcised. In essence, your ent…
/r/MensRights04/12/17 02:13 PM
2

I can't think of a single instance wherein someone would refer to a part of a human body as "mutilated" and still say it's neutral. Mutilation has negative connotations for obvious reasons. By calling circumcision mutilation, you're telling people how they should feel. I'm circumcised. I don't feel mutilated. And I find it obnoxious when people try to tell me I am. In the same way I'd feel annoyed at someone trying to tell me I'm mutilated for having my appendix removed. Or having a scar on my b…
/r/MensRights04/12/17 01:52 PM
3

it's not natural for a man to sit back and let the woman do all the work. Ah, the old "it's not natural, so it's wrong" argument. Where else has that argument come up regarding civil rights?
/r/MensRights28/11/17 06:53 PM
1

I can recall two instances when i entered a bar and a woman ran her hand up my chest (one in the shirt, one outside of the shirt). One said she just wanted to feel me. Once I had a yoga class and had trouble feeling a stretch in my back (I felt it in my calves instead). So I stayed after to ask her, she had me bend down as usual and it's not clear if she grabbed my glutes to push into position or to just grab them. I've also been catcalled once by a group of overweight black women. Walked back h…
/r/MensRights04/11/17 02:24 PM
1

Do you have a reason to suspect it isn't?
/r/MensRights03/10/17 12:49 PM
5

Short guy here (5'3"). This means I'm shorter than roughly 98% of the male population in the US. There is certainly a level of objectification that occurs in dating, wherein many women would say they refuse to date a guy shorter than they are (even in heels). I'm very picky in dating, so I totally understand where a girl is coming from there. Just like I can't choose to be taller, she can't choose to be attracted to shorter men. Like how I didn't choose to not be attracted to fat girls. I've nev…
/r/MensRights15/09/17 01:01 PM
2

By your definition I would not be considered to have been "in shape" because I wasn't thin and didn't have washboard abs, despite the strength, just like how you said OP couldn't be chubby and in shape. Did you even read my original comment? I'll quote the relevant part: Chances are, if you have a BMI over 25 and cannot bench your bodyweight, you're fat and unhealthy. By this definition, you'd be considered "in good shape" and not "chubby". FYI, abs are made in the kitchen (by eating to reduce b…
/r/MensRights23/08/17 01:17 PM
2

You misunderstood the point of that comment then. If your BMI is over 25, but you're ridiculously strong, then even though your body mass index is high, a majority of that mass is muscle mass. Not fat mass. Being able to bench your own body weight isn't necesarily [sic] a great metric. Emphasis mine. Care to elaborate on the necessarily aspect? Regardless of the MRM, I don't like bullshit. When someone says they're chubby, and immediately follows it up with how they're in good shape, I'm calling…
/r/MensRights23/08/17 03:30 AM
2

BMI. It's pretty consistent for people who aren't professional bodybuilders/powerlifters. Chances are, if you have a BMI over 25 and cannot bench your bodyweight, you're fat and unhealthy. No ifs, ands, or buts about it. Certainly not deserving of being called "in good shape"
/r/MensRights21/08/17 03:00 AM
5

what exactly means that I'm not in shape? Being chubby. Being overweight doesn't mean being obese, you're right. Being chubby means overweight. Which necessarily implies not in good shape.
/r/MensRights21/08/17 01:51 AM
9

chubby In good shape ??? You can't be both
/r/MensRights21/08/17 12:37 AM
2

That's preposterous. You're saying that nothing is definitely true then. While technically you're right on scientific backing, as no scientist claims with certainty that something is true, their claims are true with 99.9999999999999999% certainty. At some point, you have to give up this notion of absolution. It serves no good metaphorically, literally, pragmatically, or in any other realm of logic. Unless you want to circlejerk about how much you value deconstructionist logic, which is imo one o…
/r/MensRights09/08/17 09:08 PM
2

Who can you trust if not an expert? I fail to see how taking an expert's word on their area of expertise is a fallacy. That's like saying "Don't trust your doctor - that's fallacious." Doctor J. is an expert on brain cancer Doctor J. claims I have terminal brain cancer Therefore, I probably have terminal brain cancer. Okay, fine, let's say I don't trust my doctor. Then who should I trust regarding my health? Should I operate under the assumption I have brain cancer or not?
/r/MensRights09/08/17 08:21 PM
33

The memo writer has a PhD in Biology from Harvard It was to my understanding that he was a PhD student in Systems Biology at Harvard, but opted instead to complete a MSc, not completing his PhD.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 03:58 PM
1

I'm sorry, all I read was "I'm having trouble finding the sources you asked for, and I'm upset at your little jab at me, so fuck off and join the cult of short victims."
/r/MensRights05/08/17 01:42 PM
2

Short guys make less money Roughly 4 cents per hour per inch. I've seen the studies that assert it could be as much as $1000 per inch per year. Which seems like a lot. However, given the misinformation that is spread about the wage gap across men and women, I'm going to withhold any anger until I can see a definitive study that delineates job "choice" between short and tall men. receive fewer promotions Never heard this one before -- gonna need a citation here. I've also seen studies that say wo…
/r/MensRights05/08/17 01:14 PM
9

I'm a male. I'm 5'3". I don't feel like society treats me like trash. Can you elaborate? I've visited /r/short in the past and it looks like a bunch of guys with Napoleon complexes, blaming all their depression and hardships on being short. It makes no sense to me. The only sleights I've experienced are rejections for being short. But I'm shallow too, and reject women for being fat or having buzz cuts. So I'd be a hypocrite to get pissed at being rejected for my height. Thanks Edit: I love being…
/r/MensRights04/08/17 11:52 PM
1

Does this mean a lesbian cannot refer to her spouse as wifey without identifying as a man???
/r/MensRights12/07/17 10:58 PM
32

Men can't complain about a bad haircut, just a genetically receding hairline that many women automatically reject him for.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 06:00 PM
0

Third trimester at the earliest.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 09:34 PM
1

It's not the same logic at all though. Abortion → baby never born → don't have to support it Financial abortion → baby born → someone must support it Now whether it's a moral imperative that a man should support a baby he fathered is up for debate.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 03:33 PM
2

Men deserve the same reproductive rights as women. I do agree with this, though I think it's a lot more nuanced than it's often made out to be. If a woman gets pregnant and doesn't want it, while a man wants to keep it, if she aborts it then the man was deprived of something he wanted. A child (that must be supported) won't exist. If a woman gets pregnant and wants it, but the man doesn't, and she opts to keep it, then something was brought into existence against his choice, something he is part…
/r/MensRights09/07/17 01:01 PM
2

I totally get where you're coming from, I'm just objecting to your usage of killing babies. Babies are undeniably human, but fetuses or even the stem cells that eventually multiply into a fetus? I don't think it's fair to call those babies. It's language from a smear campaign against abortions. Just wanted to highlight that.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 12:51 PM
0

Fetuses are hardly human. Looking past that though, a vast majority of abortions are done very early during pregnancy, during the first trimester (less than 12 weeks). To my understanding, the fetus hasn't even developed a functional nervous system yet and can't even feel pain. So I'll leave it to the reader to determine whether these bundles of cells are human. To me, it's no more human than a sperm or an egg.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 12:30 PM
8

Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't Ernest Bax openly say he disagreed with Women's Suffrage? I can't attest to the legitimacy of this site, but he's (allegedly) been quoted saying: In my opinion there are two most powerful arguments against woman’s suffrage. Firstly, the liability of women to hysteria in one or other of the various forms of that abnormal mental condition, a condition which notoriously impairs or destroys the power of judgment. It has been shown that on the average, one …
/r/MensRights04/07/17 12:09 AM
24

men are more obese. Point of clarification: do you mean that men, on average, had a higher BMI than women, or that a higher percentage of men were obese than women? According to one source the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that the average BMIs for men and women in the United States are 26.6 and 26.5, respectively According to a study in 2011 More males than females were overweight (33.7%). We must be careful to note that overweight includes BMIs between 25 and 30, whereas…
/r/MensRights03/07/17 10:27 PM
14

I know it's an analogy, that's why I said this analogy does nothing for me. It hinges on you thinking the stairs is the more difficult path traveled. However personally, I find the stairs the easier path traveled for reasons I listed above. Unless I'm carrying suitcases, which this picture doesn't assume. Or maybe it's supposed to be the path of least resistance is the escalator. But again I find the escalator more of a nuisance than stairs because of speed and person density, so again, for me, …
/r/MensRights03/07/17 07:20 PM
149

Idk guys, something seems off. If women take the stairs more then why are more women obese than men??????? http://www.obesity.org/obesity/resources/facts-about-obesity/statistics Seriously though, this analogy does nothing for me. I'm a man and always take the stairs next to the escalator because I like exercising. And it's faster than not waiting behind a ton of people on a slow as balls escalator. Edit: on second thought, maybe I could see this as the pink tax. I don't see a sign saying women …
/r/MensRights03/07/17 06:04 PM
-7

any sane and rational person would . . . say that we should be protecting people no matter small the amount of horrific things happens Interesting viewpoint. How do you feel about the increase in GBS by swine flu vaccines in 1976? https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/guillain-barre-syndrome.html It occurred at an increased rate of 1/100,000. So I'm curious: would you have advocated we continue swine flu vaccinations, or immediate termination of swine flu vaccinations?
/r/MensRights02/07/17 06:23 PM
1

That's my point. It's a movement steeped in toxic behavior. There's a reason people look down so much on MRAs, and I think this is part of the reason. It's the same crap you see with feminism. It's stuff like this that makes me refuse to call myself a MRA. I value men's rights, I really do. But I wouldn't be caught dead identifying with the movement. And when people bring up criticisms about the movement, I find it hard to disagree with them.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 01:08 PM
0

For your contention to 4), you're painting my argument into something I never supported. I didn't take a stance on the ethics of the situation. I merely pointed it out, and explained that UNCIRCUMCISED MEN ARE NOT DIRTY is a gross oversimplification of the argument. We can debate the ethics of the studies until we're blue in the face -- the point is they exist, and the correlations are shown. I'm not going to go googling for you Well I'm the uninformed one here, wouldn't it be great to give me t…
/r/MensRights30/06/17 04:41 AM
-4

Why remove a foreskin if there is no indication that it will cause problems? Because the the doctors claim it has minimal risks, and huge benefits (not saying I agree -- I'm merely claiming that it's a procedure done for medical reasons). You claimed it wasn't about medical reasons, I said that it is. Look, I agree with you that it shouldn't be done. All I'm saying is that doctors say it's for medical reasons. Most parents are doing it because they believe "that's just what you do when you have …
/r/MensRights30/06/17 04:31 AM
-8

Do we remove people's appendix's without medical reason though? No, we don't. Sure, I'll grant you that we don't remove an appendix without a medical reason. This seems to be implying that we circumcise boys for reasons that aren't medical? Because that'd be a lie. While it exists for mostly religious reasons, it's my understanding that parents are informed by pediatricians and doctors that it is indeed health related for medical reasons. That's how you get some secular parents circumcising thei…
/r/MensRights30/06/17 02:23 AM
-11

1) that's an awful argument. The body has an appendix for a reason. Which seems to be blowing up. We could probably get by fine without it from birth. Losing foreskin doesn't physically change much for a majority of cases. Furthermore, our body swells during an injury for a reason (e.g. ankle sprain). As you learn quickly, it slows down healing and is far more painful than it needs to be. Doctors advise any means necessary (RICE method) to reduce swelling, so that you may heal properly. 2) I agr…
/r/MensRights29/06/17 11:19 PM
6

So is murder but we don't call that rape. So is domestic violence. But we don't call that rape either. I don't understand what's so difficult to grasp about the logic here.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 11:33 PM
-7

Interesting. So it seems my example with bathing and sexual assault is an even better comparison than I thought.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 06:43 PM
2

People who disagree with you aren't trolls. You're also judging my entire character based on one exchange of messages. I'll parrot back your argument: it's obvious that scrubbing your infants genitals in a bathtub is sexual assault. I mean, it'd be sexual assault if it was done on me, right? And a baby cannot consent. You say I cannot equate caretaking with sexual assault. I agree. So why can't you see that this is to show you that circumcision (genital mutilation) is not equatable to rape? That…
/r/MensRights27/06/17 06:40 PM
-4

I'll stop when you stop comparing my very real perception of bring sexually assaulted by parents to "caretaking". Note: I don't actually think this. I'm just showing you where your logic leads.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 06:33 PM
2

You don't need to scrub them to clean them. Just use a hose. Presumably you're bringing this up on a legal precedent right? So let's go through it step by step. Circumcision is rape. Okay, you've explained this (even though I disagree). Craft a law, or cite an existing law, showing it's rape and banning it. Explain to me how this law doesn't include bathing a baby. Just saying they're not equatable doesn't help your argument. Justify it. I don't think you have a legal backing here, and if you cr…
/r/MensRights27/06/17 06:32 PM
-4

I've never heard of someone wanting to be circumcised as a sexual act. I have however heard of cleaning as a sexual act. It seems that bathing a baby is closer to rape then circumcising it.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 06:28 PM
1

I don't think that's good logic. Observe: I don't feel comfortable that my parents scrubbed my genitals as an infant to clean them. Therefore both of them are perpetrators of sexual assault. The fact that I (and I'm sure others) feel this way should get lawmaker's attention on how this is wrong.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 06:19 PM
1

I read the OP. And I see your point (even though it's mostly an emotional one). You state if someone fiddled your genitals (and cut the foreskin), that it would be rape. A baby cannot consent to it, so it's rape. That's the vestige of logic I can find in your OP. Now I extend it: If someone scrubbed my genitals without my consent to clean them, that would be sexual assault. Babies cannot consent to baths. So shouldn't scrubbing a baby's genitals be sexual assault? If you say no, then I have to s…
/r/MensRights27/06/17 06:15 PM
-1

And raping is not equatable to carving either. I want you to justify why bathing and cleaning a baby's genitals is not rape, while cutting the genital is rape. I agree that bathing a baby isn't carving them. I also assert that snipping them isn't rape. I've justified my position. Can you do the same? Use logic, not insults or emotion.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 06:09 PM
0

Who are you to assert that a parent authorizing a circumcision isn't doing it out of caring for their child? If you want to dabble with legality and definitions (claiming circumcisions are rape), you must be consistent. Why is that rape but bathing and scrubbing a child (especially their genital area) not sexual assault? You must justify this. Recall: babies cannot consent to it. If someone scrubbed my penis to clean it, against my consent, to make sure I was clean, that would be sexual assault.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 06:04 PM
0

Your argument doesn't make any sense. Babies can't consent to being naked either. Does that make every parent who changes diapers a predator, stripping their baby multiple times a day? How about bathing them and scrubbing them? If I don't consent to being bathed and someone bathed me against my will, that'd certainly be sexual assault no? So is every parent who bathes their baby (without their consent) sexually assaulting their baby?
/r/MensRights27/06/17 05:59 PM
1

As I've already mentioned twice, the CDC does not differentiate between self harm (with the intent of suicide—which is what you call "suicide attempt"), and self harm without the intent of suicide (which you call "slef-harm"). They do not differentiate because they currently do not have a good way to differentiate it. As I've also already mentioned, if you're going to assert that this is sinister and lying in nature then you're going to have to explain a way to differentiate the two. Otherwise I…
/r/MensRights25/06/17 08:27 PM
1

It's not a sleight of data hand. As I've quoted, the CDC cannot differentiate between self harm with the intent of suicide and self harm that accidentally almost leads to suicide. If you want to claim that this is a sleight of hand, you must explain how it can be differentiated in the statistics. I assumed you had insight on it because you're suggesting the CDC is flat out lying about their inability to differentiate the two.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 05:24 PM
1

I did a ctrl+f search for every instance of self-harm. There are four. each year the CDC gathers data from hospitals on non-fatal injuries from self-harm. .... approximately 12 people harm themselves for every reported death by suicide. However, because of the way these data are collected, we are not able to distinguish intentional suicide attempts from non-intentional self-harm behaviors. ... Many suicide attempts, however, go unreported or untreated. Surveys suggest that at least one million p…
/r/MensRights25/06/17 01:20 PM
0

I didn't see a focus on children or women in your third link. Also, can you link specifically to where your first and second links target children and women? I can't seem to find where you're looking. I also recall reading that women attempt suicide three times more often than men, so there's that. Here it is: https://afsp.org/about-suicide/suicide-statistics/
/r/MensRights25/06/17 12:52 AM
9

I actually lurk childfree a lot, as a male, and rarely post. I think your characterization of them is a bit harsh and swift. It does seem to lean more feminist than many boards (especially this one), and I think that's expected given most of the user base is women who feel exiled from society for not wanting kids. I just finished reading most of that thread, and I do think they have a huge misunderstanding of what much of men's rights looks like. Although to be fair, I do see some really childis…
/r/MensRights21/06/17 06:33 PM
3

I see a lot of stories like this. Are there any follow up stories? Did the company allow men to wear shorts after? Did they ban skirts for men and women? Did they penalize the men who wore skirts? I'd like to see some follow up stories on these things.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 02:19 PM
1

Men have higher gray matter densities in their brain than women. In contrast, women have more white matter densities in their brain than men (interestingly, multilingual persons also have higher white matter densities than monolingual persons). I'm not a neuroscientist, but to my understanding gray matter is linked to spatial reasoning so your claim seems reasonable. What's also interesting is women seem to have better memories than men. There's a study that had men and women wait in a room fill…
/r/MensRights16/06/17 03:05 PM
1

I interpret it more as a risk-reward analysis. If there's even a 1% chance that any girl you date could falsely file a rape claim against you is not worth it to some men. Is it likely to happen? No. But it's possible, and to some men I suppose the reward of a girlfriend/marriage/etc don't justify the risk of s potentially ruined life. We know cases like this exist, the only question is how often. It'd be like a woman abstaining from relationships out of fear of a potentially domestically violent…
/r/MensRights15/06/17 05:50 PM
8

Exhibit A, gentlemen.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 09:27 PM
6

This is actually spot on. I have a morbid sense of humor, so during election season last year I would routinely say things like "bow down before your future supreme Lord-emperor Trump!" I'm sarcastic by nature, but what I didnt expect was to trigger many extreme leftists with a statement like that. It's how I found out my housemate is unreasonable. Despite my many explanations that I was voting third party and that I was a registered Democrat, he assumed and asserted to others that I voted Trump…
/r/MensRights14/06/17 09:11 PM
8

I can't attest to whether his statistic is correct, but let's assume it is, that is that 95% of women are aware of and/or will actively take advantage of the system which grants them power. In the US, there were 126 million women in 2014. About 27% of the population in the US is under 21 (again in 2014), so let's assume the women we want are over 21 -- so that there are roughly 92 million women over 21 available. Then if only 5% of women are "fine women", that leaves about 4.6 million "fine wome…
/r/MensRights14/06/17 03:06 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter