TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

The_marmalade_man Archive

View 1 post and 37 comments by The_marmalade_man on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
264

IntactivismThe_marmalade_man/r/MensRights24/08/21 06:12 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
11

I agree with the point you made here. Even though I believe feminism as a whole is irreparably corrupted by toxic ideas, it's still important to establish what opinions a self-identified feminist actually holds before condemning them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/21 01:43 AM
14

Does the average self-identified feminist believe in "the patriarchy"? Because to me, that's serves as a pretty clear-cut threshold between simply caring about women's issues, and blaming men as a sex for creating and perpetuating them. While the former is fine obviously, I believe that the latter is inherently radical and anti-male.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/21 01:04 AM
16

Ah, the real feminist. http://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/695m34/karen_straughans_response_to_those_arent_real/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/08/21 12:33 AM
6

Yes I agree. It's hard to even put into words how fucked up it is, and how much emotional damage cut men suffer when they learn about the implications of what was done to them. Of course, that's only just the beginning. Cut men spend the rest of their lives being gaslit by friends, family and the whole of society. Every time they open a newspaper or go on social media, they'll be bombarded with endless awareness campaigns and progressive ideas, stuff like respecting people's pronouns and gender …
/r/MensRights25/08/21 02:39 AM
3

Judging by your posts, you already seem pretty informed about circumcision, but this video is great and goes into a ton of detail about both MGM and FGM, if you're interested. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQQTIpBWqvY
/r/MensRights25/08/21 01:41 AM
4

I didn't mean to insinuate that you would get a positive reception by speaking out about it as a woman. It's no surprise to hear that the efforts you have made have fallen on deaf ears, given just how predisposed the average US citizen is to the cultural insanity of circumcision. Hopefully others here can share some more practical advice for you. I fortunately live in a country with no ingrained cutting culture, so I haven't got much experience with convincing pro-circumcision people in person.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 08:51 PM
12

Honestly, just have the courage to speak out about it, to friends, family, or anyone you meet who has pro-circumcision beliefs or is apathetic towards the issue. I'd say the same thing to everyone regardless of whether they are male or female, but I suspect, as is the case with many pro-men's rights stances, that you will garner a more positive reception by speaking out about it as a woman.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 08:10 PM
1

No-one is suggesting that women be forced to bear and birth children against their will. Reproductive rights for men would mean not forcing men to be financially responsible for a decision they had no part in making.
/r/MensRights30/04/21 03:41 PM
8

Why do only women deserve reproductive rights?
/r/MensRights29/04/21 03:37 AM
6

Failing to use contraception doesn't mean you have consented to becoming a parent. Women have the means of terminating their pregnancies and abandoning the responsibility of bearing a child. Why should men be held financially accountable for a decision they had no choice in making?
/r/MensRights29/04/21 03:33 AM
6

I sincerely hope someone pins you down and cuts off part of your vagina because they believe it's in your best interest.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 07:17 PM
9

Nope. Feminism is inherently anti-male, since the belief that we live in a male-dominated patriarchy is the founding pillar of feminist ideology. Believing that society benefits men at the expense of women, and that men in general deliberately act to perpetuate this system, is a thoroughly sexist way to perceive society. There isn't a significant proportion of feminists trying to challenge this narrative. You can't believe in the patriarchy without it warping how you perceive the concept of equa…
/r/MensRights26/03/21 06:05 AM
11

Yes. Circumcision removes the foreskin which contains thousands of sensitive nerve-endings. The penis can no longer be stimulated in the natural way of rolling the foreskin repeatedly over the glans, which diminishes the sexual pleasure derived from masturbation or sex.
/r/MensRights23/03/21 03:36 AM
5

The MRM is not a cohesive movement because quite frankly, a lot of the talking points and beliefs held here are still brutally rejected by society as a whole, and not many people are willing to put their neck on the line and drop their anonymity to voice their concern about men's issues in public. Having a leader is a double edged blade, it might make the movement seem more structured and legitimate, but it also creates a target for those massively opposed to their MRM to slander and discredit. …
/r/MensRights02/02/20 11:35 PM
6

Many of the people who post here aren't even engaged with the people involved in the more visible and direct forms of men's rights activism, such as the honey badgers. You won't find people here who are resentful of women spearheading or leading the movement. If anything it is reassuring for men to see women sympathise with men's issues, especially if they do so to the extent where they are willing to to put their name and face out there, in the case of the honey badgers. It is also very benefic…
/r/MensRights02/02/20 11:17 PM
17

I am very sceptical of the approach this documentary is taking. Just because this journalist is taking a more constructive approach instead of writing spiteful misandric articles, doesn't mean that they aren't deliberately framing "men's issues" in a way that doesn't contradict the feminist narrative. The main talking points revolve around blaming men's apparent inability to open up and talk about their feelings, and a lack of appreciation or need for "responsibility". Whilst these things aren't…
/r/MensRights03/05/19 02:17 PM
20

Gotta love the continued smears of Jordan Peterson with that "enforced monogamy" bullshit. Of course the hyperlink embedded to "source" the claim doesn't actually link to the video where he supposedly says this, just to the original NYT hitpiece.
/r/MensRights30/05/18 09:35 AM
31

Get a new pediatrician. Preferably one who understands basic male anatomy. Why would a child or a grown man need to retract their foreskin to urinate? And how can a qualified pediatrician be this incompetent?
/r/MensRights02/07/17 11:29 PM
13

If you are in middle school then you are pretty young. Don't come away resentful of your teacher if they give you a poor grade. It may sound harsh but your writing has a lot of faults. Even if your teacher is a feminist and has some biased views, listen to the feedback even if it is critical. Being "right" doesn't matter when writing an essay. It's about how you construct your arguments.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 01:10 AM
30

You make a lot of valid points but you don't present them eloquently or very coherently. It reads more like a rant than an essay. You should try to present your points from a neutral perspective even if you are very pro men's rights. Don't describe feminist statements, claims or impacts negatively with your own emotional adjectives. Let statistics and evidence prove your points with sources listed for every claim.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 12:08 AM
37

I think you are naive. If "Be better than feminists and we'll be bigger than feminists" actually worked then the MRM would have taken off decades ago upon it's conception. The passive approach has been tried and tested by those who came before us, and the MRM has been ignored for decades. Consider the Red Pill film. It's currently the MRM's best chance at getting recognition and positive attention. If it wasn't for Paul Elam's inflammatory and aggressive articles then it wouldn't exist. There wo…
/r/MensRights24/04/17 08:13 AM
10

I have read so many people post online that they were circumcised as a child because their doctor diagnosed them with phimosis. The foreskin is supposed to be fused to the glans until the start of puberty and only then becomes able to retract naturally. Now either American doctors know this and are so desperate to circumcise children that they wrongly diagnose this on purpose, or they actually don't know how an ordinary penis is supposed to work. There is a rare condition children can have where…
/r/MensRights02/04/17 09:27 PM
13

People like you are going to be hit the hardest when it gets outlawed. Remember these posts and remember that you had no excuse to be uninformed. I hope your son never forgives you.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 05:28 PM
13

It's sheer projection from the pro-circumcision posters. They are the ones who feel disgusted, at their parents, their doctors or themselves for doing it to their children. They can either come to terms with what's been done to them like you have, or instead continue to get defensive and angry every time they see an anti-circumcision post. Either way, I feel sorry for them.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 05:10 PM
38

Keep posting this stuff until the pro-circumcision people leave. Good riddance to them.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 04:49 PM
16

Bodily autonomy is a human right. Removing the foreskin compromises the function of the penis and objectively diminishes sexual pleasure. If you have a problem with either men or women raising awareness about male infant circumcision then you are not welcome on this sub. When it is inevitably made illegal later in your lifetime you can look back and feel bad remembering that you objected to people protesting it.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 01:16 AM
1

Thanks. It's particularly infuriating how hypocritical the presenter is. He starts the segment saying how social media abuse is proof of men's hatred of women, then takes massive offense when Milo says that women hate everybody. He also lets the women shout over Milo and doesn't let him finish speaking. Terrible and biased moderating as usual.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 01:28 PM
5

Just switched bbc one off when I heard the preview before it started. The presenter asked "Do men really hate women that much" like it was some kind of rhetorical question. I would have kept it on if I knew Milo was appearing. Just assumed it would be a feminist circlejerk.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 10:16 AM
5

Precisely. No matter how upset and anxious you might be after getting raped, you really are morally obligated to report it on behalf of the potential future victims. Of course, if you were to make that point to a woman who didn't feel compelled to report her rape, you would be called insensitive, when ironically it's the exact opposite.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 01:00 PM
15

Read posts more carefully before you reply. He isn't blaming them for getting raped, he's saying they share some responsibility if their rapist goes on to rape others, because they didn't come forward and report it.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 12:47 PM
75

I actually think accusing someone of rape like this instead of reporting it to the police is tantamount to slander, and individuals affected should be able to sue for defamation. The law actually needs to acknowledge that rape accusations destroy the accused's life in a way that practically no other accusation does, and no-one should be able to inflict that with just a inconsequential click of the mouse.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 11:46 AM
1

It must be irritating to hear the "catch more flies with honey" argument from MRAs who don't have experience dealing with these people. I can't help but think they must be new to the MRM.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 01:49 AM
1

But it works though. Look at Paul Elam, he whips up so many "obnoxious" articles on AVfM that even half the people on this forum hate him. Yet it works because he is given a platform by people seeking to expose him, like the woman making that Red Pill documentary, who changed her opinions when she heard him and other MRAs out. It's a bait and switch, and it works. I feel like you don't see the bigger picture here.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 07:35 AM
1

I still don't see how Karen coming off as obnoxious has any downsides. It's safe to say that most of CBC thinks MRA's are scumbags anyway. Regardless of whether they respond or not, it's naive to think this news network would prefer someone with a "nicer" attitude. They are not about to jump at the chance to invite someone on who would shit all over their previous uninformed bias.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 06:56 AM
2

Sure, you changed my mind. Prominent figures of the MRM just aren't humble enough.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 05:24 AM
6

She is the most popular MRA in Canada, and she is more than entitled to label herself as such after the time and effort she has put into promoting the MRM. How many people are willing to go on TV and represent the MRM in the first place? It takes balls to go on TV and have the craziest shit flung at you from all directions. You might want to save your criticism for literally anyone other than Karen.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 05:14 AM
15

I was a kid when I saw "Homer's night out" for the first time. I remember not being able to understand why Homer was in trouble and why his behavior had been a bad influence on bart. Probably the most unsettling thing is that this was an episode made in 1990. It's something I would expect from a recent episode.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/15 01:43 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter