TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Thecrumblingcookie Archive

View 1 post and 87 comments by Thecrumblingcookie on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

How does that in any way mean girl gamers are playing games for attention? For that matter what makes you think that a girl taking a picture with a controller obscuring her nipples wasn't doing it as part of a modeling shoot, as a gift for an SO, or anything other than to get guy gamers attention? For a group of people who spout about being socially awkward a whole lot guy gamers sure seem to be exceptionally confident that any girl playing a game is doing it to get their attention. "Oh this gir…
/r/MensRights16/09/13 02:31 PM
1

Just for that first tidbit, if a girl is playing an MMO how is she not a girl gamer? Do you define gamer as a person who treats video games like a secondary career? The people who play world of Warcraft and min-max and do research?
/r/MensRights15/09/13 01:27 PM
14

I'm curious as to how you know they only do it for attention? Isn't that entirely subjective?
/r/MensRights14/09/13 02:02 PM
0

To those last few sentences: No shit but jokes are jokes. Most women don't live to make sandwiches, they don't have small feet to stand nearer to a stove, but those jokes are still made frequently. Know why? Because they're fucking jokes. The holocaust wasn't funny, but people still joke about it. Dead babies aren't funny, but people still joke about it. Crying about a joke is fucking juvenile. Being able to say "It's a joke" and ignore it or accept that it's a fucking joke is the mature perspec…
/r/MensRights02/04/13 05:40 PM
3

So in order to establish that your group has the right of it you intend to do the same thing as the group you claim does it wrong? If feminists claim that anyone who makes a "kitchen joke" is a misogynist, and MRA's claim that anyone who makes a joke about (as is the typical fodder for men's jokes) a husband whose too dumb to function is misandrist, does that not simply make both parties seems immature, juvenile, and inane? Now, if feminists get bent out over those jokes, and then MRA's express …
/r/MensRights02/04/13 04:26 AM
2

I'm going to have to assume you don't know that Berserkers are from gears of war and The Covenant are from Halo, and that they don't have anything to do with each other.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 03:18 PM
4

You mean other than getting repeatedly beaten, shot, stabbed, smashed, poisoned and blown up with absolutely no medical attention and continuing to fight like it's no big deal? And that's just in Arkham City
/r/MensRights28/02/13 02:57 PM
3

There were female covenant?
/r/MensRights28/02/13 02:30 PM
7

Tomb Raider is an idyll of the female form. Sexually objectificating women. Banned.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 02:13 PM
1

Or you know, it's a fairly common form of expression to say "Oh man why did you let me do X" about something someone did in the company of others and suffered later for it. "Oh man why did you let me smoke that joint before my interview" "Oh man why'd you let me drive 100 miles on that flat tire" I don't see why we're taking that expression literally now. It's pretty normal to say "Why'd you let me drink so much" as a way of expressing "This is the worst hangover ever and I regret it" without th…
/r/MensRights11/02/13 12:20 AM
1

No the problem is that you have been brainwashed into believing that you are ok with the so called "traditional gender roles" and so you continue to perpetuate them. You'd know better but because you're a man you don't understand these complex patriarchical issues. </sarcasm>
/r/MensRights11/02/13 12:15 AM
-1

I really don't see why there was a need to say that. Facebook is never the place to have any sort of discussion on it, nor does it do any good to try and showcase "moral superiority" because someone posted a chain message type image on Facebook. That kind of thing happens all the time for both genders. To me this looks like someone sharing an image that they liked, and someone else commenting on it like a petulant child who is overly eager to spout their disagreement. This seems far more contrar…
/r/MensRights06/02/13 03:26 PM
5

This sounds like a point in favor of mras honestly. It's kind of pointing out how "Gee you see how saying don't rape hasn't been working? So why are you still saying it?" Sort of like the definition of insanity. I don't really know the context though.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 11:44 PM
-2

Please that's like saying that guns result in death by bullet. If men would stop shooting people then guns wouldn't be killing anyone. If men would stop raping people then people wouldn't be raped. Right? Isn't that how things work?
/r/MensRights03/01/13 11:43 PM
1

So rather than having a discussion based on real world data we should sit here and circle jerk about "lol womynz is dumb huh guys?"
/r/MensRights29/12/12 03:31 PM
1

How does my statement not make sense? This post in this subreddit is suggesting that women get child support and then try to spend it at bars. It is just as likely that men would do the same thing. This post is just a giant circle jerk where people would like to bash women as if there aren't scumbag dads out there who get child support and waste it. My dad got paid child support from my biological mother, and not all of it was spent on necessities for myself and my sister. So why does this post …
/r/MensRights29/12/12 02:57 PM
7

Same situation. This made me feel sad that I don't have a sagely father to feel that way about.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 09:53 PM
2

Go ahead and source that. Otherwise I'm calling this bullshit, and would like to point out that using sweeping generalizations like this one is extremely hypocritical if you would then turn around and gripe that SOME feminists say all men are rapists (I have heard that argument). This sub isn't meant to be a "bash feminism and circle jerk about feminists" area. It's a place to discuss the issues of inequality and discuss rationally possible solutions to inequality.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 04:11 AM
5

Obscure Canadian group seeks controversy in order to garner attention through attacks on men's rights groups. Saying "we just call out sexism for what it is! And we don't appreciate Canada's role in the war of 1812, we feel that apologies need to be made!" Silly obscure Canadian activist group, political activism is for everyone, even if you don't agree with them, eh. Disclaimer: that wasn't a direct quote so it isn't source able .
/r/MensRights01/12/12 02:28 PM
7

They are most definitely still people. Especially considering there are quite a few people who are convicted without an overwhelming supply of evidence to convict with. Unless we rework the system to convict only those who can actually be proven guilty beyond a shadow of a doubt then we shouldn't be condemning people to torturous conditions. Human beings are human beings regardless of the things they've done, and unless you can unequivocally prove that someone committed a heinous act of violence…
/r/MensRights30/11/12 05:50 PM
2

See if the death penalty was the easy way out, these guys on death row wouldn't be searching for ways to turnover the penalty or delay it. The fact of the matter is a lot of them function pretty well in prison. They can typically get drugs and cigarettes, ferment their own disgusting alcohol, and just exist in a situation that is fairly normal for most of them. If you want to be completely honest about it most of them would do a life sentence happily over death row because its easy for a lot of …
/r/MensRights30/11/12 05:30 PM
3

I was hearing recently about a specific crimes division of the Italian police force known as the gender crimes division which handles cases regarding male on female violence and thought to myself "Why the fuck does that need to be a specific division of the police force? Why would you not just have a violent crimes division?" But I don't know much about the Italian cultural norms in regards to gender equality so I couldn't really pass judgment on it. This topic reminded me because of how the que…
/r/MensRights30/11/12 05:27 PM
5

Not really bullshit at all. It's not easy to understand how depression feels without experiencing it. Being able to empathize with someone doesn't mean you actually understand how it feels. You can be empathetic towards a person who suffers from bipolar disorder, but you won't actually understand how it feels or effects them if you don't have it yourself. Edit: Please stop downvoting notcaptainkirk, he was expressing his opinion AND contributing to the discussion. Downvotes are not meant to be u…
/r/MensRights24/11/12 03:49 AM
3

Good. Let them be worried about bearing false witness and giving false testimony.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 06:03 AM
8

They're both actors and they both know each other. If Justin really feels that he was violated, why hasn't he filed any charges. Uhh, Justin Beiber is a pop star, not an actor. Jenny McCarthy is a former playboy model, and Jim Carrey's ex wife. Not an actor. My point in the David Tennant comment is that there are without a doubt thousands of 18 year old women that fantasize about David Tennant (or John Barrowman, in any case) groping them, amongst other things. It wouldn't be considered creepy i…
/r/MensRights20/11/12 12:40 AM
5

You have no idea what you're talking about obviously. I even listed what the typical punishment is for first time offenders. First time domestic violence typically leads to: Fine, probation, protective order Chris Brown's punishment: Probation, community service, protective order Same crime, almost the same punishment. The only difference is because he is famous more people know about it. So NO his crime would not land a regular person "in jail" because a judge will almost always suspend jail ti…
/r/MensRights19/11/12 11:45 PM
6

5 years probation, community services, labels placed on physical copies of his album, and an order that he remain at least 50 yards from Rihanna (obviously this hasn't been enforced or has been rescinded). The average punishment for a first time offender in a domestic violence case is: Probation, a fine, and a protective order. So which part about him receiving the typical punishment of a first time offender was him not being punished? There are plenty of popular and successful people who violat…
/r/MensRights19/11/12 11:33 PM
6

Battered Person Syndrome is not the same as Stockholm syndrome. Stockholm pertains to individuals who have been held against their will (ie hostages, kidnapped children) who develop empathy and sympathy for their captors. Rihanna was not abducted or held hostage by Chris Brown.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 11:22 PM
3

I don't think you actually understand what that is. Read this and you might understand that not only is Stockholm syndrome not related to this, but the insinuation is both uneducated and unfunny.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 11:10 PM
-8

It wasn't permitted for him. He was punished for it. Why should we continue to bear the torch for Rihanna after Chris Brown was punished and she forgave him? Also, how is a specific instance which has been dealt with translatable to domestic abuse should be permitted for everyone if it's permitted for him. Think you could escalate a little faster there?
/r/MensRights19/11/12 11:08 PM
18

You can tell he wanted it because of the way he is dressed. I mean seriously look at that outfit.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 10:39 PM
-4

You might be forgetting that Rihanna herself has forgiven and resumed a relationship with Chris Brown. If the victim is no longer holding him responsible how can you expect others to bear the torch for her?
/r/MensRights19/11/12 10:39 PM
23

How coincidental, my shtick is to grab 18 year old women by the neck and bite their neck a little bit and when they turn around get a handful of ass because they're just so delicious. It is especially funny when I do it in front of a very large crowd of people!
/r/MensRights19/11/12 10:33 PM
0

I read through some of your post history and discovered that not only are you very bad at grammar, spelling, and the English language in general, but that you apparently argue with a lot of people quite often, have terrible comprehension, and are more than likely a troll. You have been blocked, as I'm tired of children who cannot speak or reason and haven't left high school polluting these threads.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 09:50 AM
1

You just said multiple times that they would seek out the male actors so they could meet with "the dreamy hunk"? Care to source that, because I'm not seeing anywhere that they were stalking the male actors. I'm not missing their behavior, look it up. It is a fan group that has been around since 2007. Until you provide me with an article stating that these Twilight Moms were stalking the male actors as you purport then I am going to continue to disagree. Again, these women weren't "seeking out" a…
/r/MensRights17/11/12 09:21 AM
-2

Here's the difference: The whole Twilight Moms thing is an entire fangirl community of Twilight fans who are also older women. It's kind of being misconstrued here as though they call themselves Twilight Moms because they're sexually attracted to the actors in the movie. That isn't it. In fact if you checked google you'd probably find results about their fan forums much the same as you find for things like A Song of Ice and Fire or the Harry potter series. They aren't 40 year old women pining wi…
/r/MensRights17/11/12 04:46 AM
-4

And what there weren't plenty of men drooling over say, Emma Watson, before she was 18?
/r/MensRights17/11/12 01:07 AM
2

There's your problem. That is a cartoon character. Seriously though, I don't recall people being in uproar over men drooling over any attractive young starlets. Feel free to provide an article that shows otherwise though.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 10:24 PM
7

Grown men slobber over young women in movies all the time. Where are you going with this?
/r/MensRights16/11/12 09:54 PM
1

And all those clones of that one person would still disagree on stuff, and form awkward governments and nation states populated entirely by that person. With different economic policies and the like. Until eventually that person declared war on the other nation states and wiped themselves out. And that's what happens inside your head every time your opinion on something changes.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 03:50 AM
5

Women being forced to sell sex is a real thing. Human trafficking exists and is a real criminal operation. However I thought that was referring to women like porn stars and strippers. Which is funny to me because isn't saying a woman shouldn't be a stripper shaming them for their sexuality.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 02:57 AM
2

6: Because any woman who makes a small fortune dancing in a strip club is degrading to me because we both have the same genitals. Unless she's being slut shamed by men and then she is morally right and just and you are wrong.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 02:54 AM
2

OP is a man? Check OP didn't like it? Check OPs friend is a simple bitch? Check
/r/MensRights12/11/12 06:03 PM
1

I agree with this Men's Rights and Women's Rights are both Human Rights You are right. However I feel I should state that feminism has taken the role of "For the advancement and betterment of women" over a role of equality. That is what I dislike about it. I fully believe that all human beings ought to be viewed as equals. The only time someone should not be afforded full freedoms is when they present a direct threat to the autonomy of others. Aside from that all people should be regarded as equ…
/r/MensRights05/10/12 01:46 AM
1

Again, someone who would rather bash someone for their opinions than actually attribute something intelligent to the discussion. You described yourself rather astutely here. You used personal attacks to rebut my points (as you so eloquently put it "bashing someone for their opinion"). Whereas I never bashed your opinion. In fact I acknowledged that some of your points are correct. The only thing I criticized was your flawed delivery of those points. In fact you seem to have decided that I was in…
/r/MensRights05/10/12 01:33 AM
1

When you learn how to converse without straw man arguments and trying to defend your point by claiming your opponent is a brainwashed feminist defender let me know. Until then carry on with your hypocritical and fallacious reasoning.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 10:52 PM
2

How does stating that you shouldn't behave like rad-fems equate to defending vindictive women? If anything it is insulting them. Saying their behavior should not be emulated. It seems you are every bit as stuck in victim mode as rad-fems are though, and that makes it impossible to have reasonable discussion. Because you will be insistent that men are the victims of a maniacal social construct designed to protect women and take men's rights from them. There isn't a war of the sexes being waged. T…
/r/MensRights04/10/12 10:38 AM
17

"Men are always going to be subjugated by women..." You sound like a feminist crying patriarchy there. No offense to you just watch how you phrase things. There are plenty of places on Earth where a woman can't use rape claims as a weapon and throughout history women haven't always been able to do that. We made some progress in the past century and need to taper off the mentality of "women need better treatment to be equal" and begin to balance it out. That doesn't mean that women are subjugatin…
/r/MensRights03/10/12 06:40 PM
3

Actually you said rather explicitly that you're sure 99.999% of the population of the US knows what constitutes rape. My point was that no, they really don't. For a vast majority of people rape is equated to the violent and dramatized portrayal in television shows and movies, which reflects a very small portion of cases that can be tried as rape. I didn't assume what you said, I responded to something you said explicitly within the first lines of your comment.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 05:23 AM
9

Your statement is not entirely true. Holding a woman at knifepoint and forcing her into sex is most certainly rape, and a very violent example of it. Rape can also be when a teenage guy coerces his girlfriend/date into sex without consent, or when a young woman forces an inebriated young man into sex and assumes its consent because he was erect. Rape isn't quite so black and white as "Was the victim explicitly threatened or restrained in order to attain sex". It encompasses a much broader spectr…
/r/MensRights03/10/12 04:56 AM
3

Opinionated old women and television shows.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 11:11 PM
6

For example, the state of Arizona (if I remember correctly) allows use of force in self defense only if no other means of escape are possible ie: Locked in a windowless bathroom with someone beating down the door. In Texas, use of force in self defense extends to anything that could be considered a justifiable threat on your property. Been a long time since I read up on it though so my info could be outdated.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 09:57 PM
3

Right. Not only was this guy just trying to be nice by helping her take some shit upstairs, but then he refuses sex because he has a wife, and gets stabbed and raped for it. And what do they focus on? She looked like Angelina Jolie... wait what? What the fuck? No it doesn't matter that in the course of doing his job he drove the woman home, and in an effort to be nice he assisted her with some bags and was raped for it. That isn't important. What is important is that she moderately resembles som…
/r/MensRights27/08/12 01:33 AM
12

Does that change that they refer to it as rape only once in the headline and downplay it even though the man was stabbed? Regardless of the level of journalism it is still a valid representation. They refer to her as "stunning" for fucks sake. If any rape was ever reported with the genders reversed in which they described the male rapist as "handsome" or "dashing" while describing him holding a woman at knife point and raping her there would be major outcry. This is one of those instances where …
/r/MensRights26/08/12 04:25 PM
1

You want to develop a virus for women that "dissolves" a growing fetus inside them? Wouldn't that be a pretty risky move considering the virus could just as easily "dissolve" all the other living tissues around the growing fetus?
/r/MensRights26/08/12 03:13 PM
-1

I think the most annoying song I've heard along the "stupid menz" train of thought is that recent one by Cher Lloyd. I can't help but pick it apart because it pretty much says "I thought I was better than you, so I left you and thought you'd be devastated over it and I could gloat. Then you didn't really care that much and are happy and now I want to make you feel shitty so I want to break you and your current girl up so I can have you back." Hell it's pretty insulting to both genders really.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 02:15 AM
2

It's also Facebook. So you're getting a biased sample. How many of those people would change their answers (be they positive or negative) if they were anonymously doing so?
/r/MensRights05/08/12 03:57 AM
2

Hence the avoidance of a bunch of MRA/femposter melodrama on a subreddit for gaming with enough fanboy/fangirl rage already
/r/MensRights03/08/12 09:09 AM
7

They probably wanted to avoid a bunch of melodrama.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 07:41 AM
1

I agree completely with the second bit. Feminism does believe men are more than that. They provide a very easy, generalized scapegoat for which women can blame all their worldly ills. Yay feminism. /s [Just in case it wasn't clear]
/r/MensRights03/08/12 07:09 AM
1

The comments thread on that site has so many people telling him to file a complaint. That is the worst advice I've seen given. All that would do is get him on the shit list for the police force and cause them to fuck with him for anything they could. I've seen it happen, and unless he's going to take them to the mat for inappropriate conduct or conduct unbecoming then he shouldn't file a complaint. Spread the word to people yeah, but don't run your mouth to the cops about a cop. They just take i…
/r/MensRights01/08/12 03:27 PM
4

Thank you. In an event like this the most prevalent thing to a person is survival. Instinct takes over and the fight or flight response tells you "You can't win this, get the fuck out of there." People in the military get training not to flee. That said, I'd like to think that given the situation I'd have tried to protect the kids. As you said I can't know without having experienced it. I don't think i'd be able to flee the theater out of fright though honestly. I'd probably hear the shots and j…
/r/MensRights27/07/12 09:46 PM
1

You can 'win' by destroying the other person with facts/insults/etc., making him/her look stupid in front of others, or shouting loudly. I say If your intent is to win an argument, you have already lost.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 05:53 AM
2

If your intent is to win an argument, you have already lost. It is only when you enter the contest with the intent to learn from discussion rather than prove yourself right with arguments and appeals that you are truly victorious.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 04:37 AM
1

Do you equate a parent saying "Don't hit your brother" to someone telling you that rape is wrong?
/r/MensRights17/07/12 05:32 PM
1

I know that rape is wrong, but no one ever had to sit me down and explain that it is not okay to impose your will on someone else, or to force them to do something against their will, or to violently force them into a twisted mockery of sex.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 05:11 PM
2

You just proved my point for me the text implies that some men are rapists because they have not been taught better by their parents So they are rapists because they are men and weren't told not to do it? Not because they are sick fucking individuals, but because they are men and would just naturally do that?
/r/MensRights17/07/12 04:40 PM
2

Sorry but it wasn't 30 men. The journalist who caught it on film stated 11 men, some of them have already been taken into custody and the others are being actively searched for. It was not a riot with a swelling throng of men assaulting her, it was 11 men. Meaning if a small fraction of the onlookers had stepped in they could have separated her from the pack. Also, my point was never that this was a woman taking a risk by being out at night, my point was that the caption expressed in the OP imag…
/r/MensRights17/07/12 03:53 PM
3

Ok i'm sorry I didn't know the full story behind this, but even with the additional information the statement of: Don't teach your daughters not to step out in the night, teach your sons better heavily implies that your sons aka men are rapists or will sexually molest a woman because that's who they are. Here is a thought, why could no one step in and defend this young woman if it was happening in front of people? Hows about "Don't allow injustice to happen in front of you and do nothing, teach …
/r/MensRights17/07/12 04:51 AM
2

Possibly just because /r/athiesm is a circlejerk and not a real discussion platform.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 04:37 AM
9

What degree of alien are we talking about here? If UFO flew over kansas and abducted cow then no. If possible primitive life within the galaxy or quite possibly similarly or more advanced civilizations farther than we can actively observe at the time being, then I think that's plausible if not necessarily probable.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 04:36 AM
1

Perhaps I am different in this, but I approve of SRS... because it allows me to glance at its front page and say "Oh good, I'm still not batshit crazy."
/r/MensRights17/07/12 04:34 AM
3

Sorry if this doesn't necessarily add anything substantial to the conversation, but I worked in a Chinese restaurant while I was in high school that was owned by an older Chinese woman. She wrote her own phrases for fortune cookies, and would often hand cookies with the fortune "Avoid dark alleys" to the high school girls who would come in. I have to admit I thought it was pretty hilarious to see this girls crack open the fortune cookie and read that.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 04:29 AM
3

Hey now, sometimes it takes more than 12 hours, but at that point there is usually interest. I believe the last time I checked the High Patriarch of Finance had set the interest rate to 38.4% for every day past 48 hours, so we're really making a profit in some cases.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 04:26 AM
6

Blank? BLANK!? You're not looking at the bigger picture!
/r/MensRights17/07/12 04:23 AM
1

That's in the curable cases. Most often it results in a very long, arduous, and painful death.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 01:59 AM
3

Do you need a source for this? I'm fairly certain he said he didn't have any of the information on this topic and was asking for credible sources for information such as: it removes some of the most sensitive regions, reduces protection from abrasion which protects against more loss of sensitivity, has a risk of complications, is extremely painful, kills several hundred people per year from botched attempts, and can cause problems later on through damage You're so cool because you can quote one …
/r/MensRights12/07/12 09:54 PM
3

What a coincidence, I regard pregnancy as the most expensive and detrimental STD currently in existence.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 09:46 PM
1

So we should then prosecute all personnel who have performed these searches and incarcerate them?
/r/MensRights11/07/12 07:03 PM
1

Actually I said unless these men were forced into intercourse they weren't raped. I in fact said the argument could be made that due to the false allegations that these men could be considered sexually assaulted depending on the methods used in their exams. We don't have the information of what examinations were done so we cannot accurately comment on what it constitutes as. Being that they were most likely not forced into sexual intercourse, then they would not be classified as victims of rape.…
/r/MensRights11/07/12 05:26 PM
1

So as I said earlier, This would mean every person in our country who is currently or has been in jail or prison is a victim of rape, and any employee who has performed general processing is a rapist and should be prosecuted as such correct?
/r/MensRights11/07/12 05:23 PM
2

It has nothing to do with how feminists define it. A police officer performing a cavity check is a far cry from a man forcing himself on a woman or a woman forcing herself on a man. Did the officers force these men to bend over and get fucked in the ass? No? Then they weren't raped. They were cavity searched. And while that's probably a very uncomfortable and awkward experience it isn't rape. It could be considered sexual assault depending on the methods used, but we don't have that information …
/r/MensRights11/07/12 01:12 PM
2

If you're going to claim that the search police perform upon processing is rape, then you'd also have to consider the searches performed on females put through processing as rape wouldn't you? I'm not saying the fact that these men were put through a cavity search is okay, but don't refer to it as rape. Sexual assault possibly depending on the actual techniques used, but we don't have that information. As I was saying though, if you're going to consider processing rape, then every person in jail…
/r/MensRights11/07/12 04:36 AM
1

Well no, obviously not. I wasn't so much making a commentary on the individuals but adding a "what if" that followed along her apparent thought process for her statement. Sort of a refer to Figure 1.2 if you will
/r/MensRights29/06/12 05:14 PM
27

Just break down the word. Feminism doesn't break down to meaning "Equal and balanced rights for all people regardless of race, gender, socio-economic status, beliefs, ideals, or any other grounds on which they may be unjustly persecuted." What it comes from is actually the French féminisme which originated around the time of the French Revolution, as the belief that the women of the time deserved equal status as citizens. Feminism, by definition, has always been a movement centered on building u…
/r/MensRights29/06/12 08:21 AM
17

I don't see how that wasn't the most obvious part. How are the biggest victims not the people whose lives were lost because of it? "Oh you died in the war? Well, now I have to be sad, organize this funeral, and tuck Timmy in. You had it easy asshole." What the fuck?
/r/MensRights29/06/12 08:13 AM
1

My point was that he has more financial backing. Not that he personally has more money than he can use. When you look at the super pacs investing astounding amounts of money into him, as compared to his competition in the primary, he has them beat by a long shot.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 03:05 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter