TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheeCandyMan Archive

View 1 post and 57 comments by TheeCandyMan on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

TheeCandyMan/r/MensRights14/03/12 01:10 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Rich people don't suffer the same penalties as us common folk.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 02:59 AM
7

And here we get to the crux of the argument. Women are permanently in an oppressed state merely because men exist. If I said all women would have to die for us to live in peace that would be one of the most utterly misogynistic things I could say. And yet here you are proposing that all men must die for women to be free and worst of all there are people who take you seriously instead of realizing what an utter nutcase you are. I hope you can mature and realize one day what a fool you have been. …
/r/MensRights31/12/14 11:04 PM
28

Not really. Last year women only accounted for 7.5% of patents issued.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 09:06 PM
3

I don't believe anyone could think a 12 year old was 19. A jury wouldn't believe it either. On the insanely unlikely chance you're really just that oblivious to the point of not recognizing a prepubescent girl masquerading as a 19 year old, gather evidence, talk to a lawyer and prepare to get fucked by the long dick of the law if you did anything remotely sexual with her. Which IMO you would deserve as I really can't believe a human could be so oblivious. If you truly remained platonic then lawy…
/r/MensRights05/04/14 10:28 PM
1

there is no superior way to think. That's not actually true. It's a very interesting subject though, the quality of different lines of thinking. All that is beside the point though. Your internal value system when it comes to the marital worth of a woman is all messed up from my perspective. Would a woman who married a man after knowing him for 24 hours, had sex with him and subsequently got a divorce be more desirable, from a personal marital stance, than one who had had sex with a long term bo…
/r/MensRights11/01/14 07:37 PM
0

Are you 15 or something buddy? You'll learn in a few years that virginity isn't really important at all and doesn't actually mean much.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 06:04 PM
2

It's be great to get high and write about how everyone is out to get you.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 06:00 PM
2

Mmmm... Gender rolls sound tasty.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 08:58 PM
-1

Unfortunately this is fake. You can tell by the name Jimmy Russels. It's one of the most common fake names for 4chaners to use to rustle peoples jimmies.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 01:18 PM
2

I think this comment is much more important than many of us realize. The fact of how popular it is highlights a key aspect about our thought pattern. We are not so mentally limited that we absolve the victim of any culpability. We can recognize that the victim sometimes might have walked right into it. I just really like that.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 09:32 PM
1

Joss Whedon looks a bit like Jim Gaffigan in that picture.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 08:28 PM
9

I read in the other reddit thread about this video that it was because he sung a very sexual song to a supposed 16 year old in the crowd. But, I'm not positive on this.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 01:24 AM
4

Do you really want to walk out on your children or do you want her to leave?
/r/MensRights08/09/12 06:52 PM
1

Thank you. I'm glad someone can see it my way.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 01:40 AM
0

Now read the title of this post and remind yourself of what we're debating, that using females in a context like the one of this post is not something we should be doing as it is a non-scientific context.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 01:22 AM
3

Female and male are more scientific terms used to universally discuss sex in all species. "Human females" sounds weird because you're using scientific language in a completely unscientific and trivial situation. Pick one.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 01:07 AM
-1

When most people, in most contexts, say animals, they mean all animals besides humans. The reason for using women over females is somewhat difficult for me to explain as I haven't put enough thought into it so that I can clearly convey it. Basically what it boils down to is that using the term females, while technically correct, is not perceived positively by outsiders resulting in more negative PR for MRAs. I'll try to explain more however strangely. In order for the title to be more correct it…
/r/MensRights02/09/12 12:35 AM
-9

It's not a slur. It's a dehumanizing term and it's connotation is more of describing the sex of animals rather than humans.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 11:46 PM
-7

Say women, not females. Language is very important and using females when talking about women is a very poor use of it. EDIT TIME: Saying females is not a slur but it's no way to get people sympathetic to our cause. Also, consider who posted this and their probable intentions.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 10:47 PM
7

What if taking or giving one up the poop chute is "normal sexual activity" for you? It's far too subjective to base an argument off of.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 09:36 PM
3

I'm so glad you're here now that she deleted her post.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 07:31 AM
2

Check my edits my top post. Then come back with actual facts and then we'll talk.
/r/MensRights16/06/12 07:31 PM
0

You're clearly ignoring reality. Have you ever heard a go back to the kitchen joke? My point it simply this, there are a lot more people who would find it amusing to edit the women's rights page than the men's rights page. That's why it's locked.
/r/MensRights16/06/12 02:38 PM
1

Just think about this logically. How many jokes have you heard where the butt of them is women's rights? Plenty I'm sure. Now, think of how many people might think, "HURR DURR it would be so funny if I edited the wiki page for women's rights just to say 'a joke'." With that number of people in your mind, think about how many people are aware of men's rights. EDIT: All of you are letting your emotions blind you from what's really going on. Without protection the wiki page for women's rights would…
/r/MensRights16/06/12 06:56 AM
2

"What would you say to those claiming that, in the grand scheme of things, this issue is a "luxury problem"? My point is that this is part and parcel of the kind of oppression that leads to women being raped, getting lower salaries, and being exposed to violence in relationships." I never knew that by slouching I was supporting women being raped. I'll change my ways as soon as possible.
/r/MensRights15/06/12 06:36 AM
1

If winking at someone is harassment I don't think I want to live on this planet anymore.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 03:16 AM
9

Well, if a woman is abusing a man it's pretty obvious he's doing something to cause it. /s
/r/MensRights21/05/12 11:38 PM
156

So can they start charging black people more for tickets?
/r/MensRights09/05/12 08:12 PM
23

implying she's actually a feminist and not just a moron who posts on facebook Seriously guys, someone being a woman does not make them a feminist and one person making an ignorant statement doesn't mean we can extrapolate that to the whole group.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 06:28 AM
3

I don't think what someone finds attractive makes them a bigot at all. I'd even go as far as to say that someone who is exclusively attracted to one race isn't necessarily a bigot.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 07:37 AM
-1

Zomgondo and Aikidi were both awarded my shiny, red, highly coveted 'Moron' RES tag.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 07:04 PM
10

How come someone can run an all-woman legal firm but someone else couldn't run an all-man legal firm?
/r/MensRights16/04/12 05:38 PM
3

Prom is $125 each so $250 total where I am. My girlfriend and I are splitting it though. But yes I do think it should be acceptable for you to ask for her to pay for her own ticket. She might not react as she ought to though.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 06:47 AM
11

Whether it is intended or not doesn't really matter, the fact remains that different clothing accentuates different parts of the body in different ways.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 03:26 AM
5

Thank you for your hard work.
/r/MensRights22/03/12 12:21 AM
19

Oh, also. control00's account was made today and is likely a troll.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 08:12 PM
34

You're a dumbass. You just don't realize it yet. When you realize that only men have to sign up for selective service, you quickly realize why only men should be allowed to vote. you quickly realize why only men should be allowed to vote only men should be allowed to vote Seriously, people like you make us all look bad. Stop it.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 08:08 PM
1

Yeah! If you wear a tie you're wearing the man's leash! You don't see me wearing a tie, do you? You know why? Because I'm a rebel. The day they tried to enforce the dress code on me, I let them know there could be an accident around here if that happened.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 10:41 PM
3

I'm just wondering what you said here. (I assume it was you.)
/r/MensRights16/03/12 06:13 AM
-1

The majority of women report having no G-spot [Citation Needed]
/r/MensRights15/03/12 06:01 AM
5

As someone who knows a bit about a woman's anatomy, women have 3 pubic erogenous spots: The clitoris, the G-spot and the A-spot. FGM sometimes removes one of them. Although I wouldn't claim to know, I highly doubt it 'completely destroys' one's ability to experience pleasure.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 04:21 AM
1

What if I like shitting on people's lawns?
/r/MensRights15/03/12 02:56 AM
2

A very thought provoking post. Seems accurate too. I'm not actually sure what to think right now. I'll have to get back to you.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 04:17 AM
1

Thanks for replying. I see it as mostly a descriptor. Like that person is tall. That person is fat. That person is a slut. And just as people have different definitions for fat and tall, people have different definitions for slut. I as a 6'4" guy don't see as many tall people as a 5'4" would see. It's all relative.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 04:09 AM
1

I like what you have to say very much and I would agree that being safe is more important. I chose 1000 partners because it was pretty unquestionably excessive. I didn't want to get into value judgments on how many partners is okay.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 04:06 AM
2

You make a very good point.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 02:34 AM
0

I both agree and disagree with some parts. I agree with the first part but I'm not sure why being spiritual is important. On the last part, it makes sense to have social sanctions against undesirable actions. For example we have social sanctions against people being criminals in order to discourage it. It won't prevent it but discouraging is effective. I'm not saying we should have organized campaigns against people with copious amounts of sexual partners but calling someone, either gender, a sl…
/r/MensRights14/03/12 01:49 AM
3

Gay men are still men.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 10:28 PM
30

I don't believe anything is out of bounds in comedy.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 07:29 AM
11

Haha, victim blaming, how ironic.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 07:14 PM
-6

Women are biologically programmed to grow breasts. Is that okay?
/r/MensRights23/02/12 07:21 AM
30

Exactly, it's called child support, not mother's luxuries.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 09:38 PM
5

They've internalized their misandry... I'm sorry, I'll show myself out.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 07:18 AM
1

Why is victim blaming so taboo? If someone leaves their front door open while they go vacation, are they really devoid of all blame when their house gets burglarized? If someone is downloading tons of stuff from questionable sites without a virus blocker, are they really completely not at fault? The world isn't foam padded for everyone's protection. People need to be cautious.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 10:15 AM
1

principal FTFT
/r/MensRights16/11/11 06:11 AM
6

Just ignore this person. Better yet ban them from the subreddit because if you look at their comment history it is incredibly evident that they are trolling and are only commenting to get our reactions.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 01:20 AM
4

It's not a phone call though. It's a voicemail.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 03:49 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter