TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheeSweeney Archive

View 2 posts and 122 comments by TheeSweeney on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Are you genuinely curious about how it relates or is your starting position “it couldn’t possibly be relevant?”
/r/MensRights19/07/22 07:33 PM
1

When women come at me with men are this men are that i hear them out. I listen to their pov and consider all the reasons why she may feel this way. I try to come up with a solution. Everytime i bring up that they can also do bad things there is always an excuse, followed by an attack. Usually by several feminists and white knights. I dont personally attack people. I just point out that hey guess what women can do bad things too hoping that we can come to some type of agreement and find common gr…
/r/MensRights25/04/22 07:20 PM
1

If their response is “you’re an incel loser” then I’m absolutely certain your position in the conversation is not as tame as “hey guess what women can do bad things too.” Can you share a specific comment reply/thread where you were being purely reasonable and rational and feminists responded with vitriol for now reason? Cmon man, look what you’re doing right here, with this post. You’re making huge assumptions about all feminists, and all women, while getting upset at them for doing the same thi…
/r/MensRights25/04/22 03:45 PM
1

What, specifically, did you say?
/r/MensRights25/04/22 03:37 PM
3

What, specifically, did you say that got you banned and called a “pathetic incel?”
/r/MensRights24/04/22 08:54 PM
1

Do you want a “no women allowed” party?
/r/MensRights20/04/22 03:51 AM
1

everyone’s different, so you may not feel all that tingly goodness in the same area as another person. Correct, which is almost a carbon copy of what I said earlier. It may not be personally erotic to you, but it is still an erogenous zone. My nipples are not an erogenous zone. I don't know what to tell you man, but they literally are. That's like saying "my nipples aren't areolas."
/r/MensRights16/04/22 06:13 AM
1

I see you couldn’t find a single article that didn’t mention nipples. Erogenous zone: An erogenous zone (from Greek ἔρως, érōs "love"; and English -genous "producing", from Greek -γενής, -genḗs "born") is an area of the human body that has heightened sensitivity, the stimulation of which may generate a sexual response, such as relaxation, sexual fantasies, sexual arousal and orgasm. The key words I’m there are “heightened sensibility” - as a result of lots of nerve endings - and “may generate a …
/r/MensRights15/04/22 06:03 PM
3

I certainly do, particularly in the context of this law and the comment I was referring to. Do me a favor, google “male erogenous zones” and see if you can find an article that doesn’t include nipples.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 05:33 PM
2

Something may not be erotic to you, but that doesn’t make it NOT an erogenous zone. I’m not into feet. I don’t like to touch them or have them be touched. My feet are still an erogenous zones.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 05:16 PM
4

What’s the difference between something being “sexually stimulating” and “erotic?” I didn’t have to dig. Google “erogenous zones” or “erogenous zones men diagram” and the link I shared was literally the first thing. If you google “erogenous zones men” this article pops up, again containing male nipples. https://www.womenshealthmag.com/sex-and-love/a19983318/erogenous-zones-for-men/ Could you share any sources for your definition of “erogenous zone” that is exclusive of male nipples?
/r/MensRights15/04/22 05:15 PM
1

That entirely depends on the context in which they’re being stimulated. This is true for every erogenous zone. Scratching your balls doesn’t make you horny, but that doesn’t mean they’re not an erogenous zone.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 05:03 PM
16

I have to break it to you, but male nipples are absolutely an erogenous zone. Necks are erogenous zones. Feet are erogenous zones. Scalp, ears, naval, sacrum, armpits, wrists, hands/fingertips, mouth/lips, inner thighs, are all erogenous zones. The position “we should not allow erogenous zones to be visible in public” is both uninformed and nonsensical. https://www.healthline.com/health/healthy-sex/erogenous-zones#The-bottom-line
/r/MensRights15/04/22 04:52 PM
9

Can you share any examples of men being arrested for looking at breasts in a location where it is legal for women to be topless?
/r/MensRights15/04/22 04:49 PM
27

That’s a ridiculous assumption. Women have been alllowed to be topless in NYC for decades and men getting sued for looking is literally never a problem You have entirely and totally manufactured something to be upset about. I genuinely don’t understand why you’d be upset about this law. It’s a step towards gender equality.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 04:48 PM
0

Have you taken these classes yourself or is it something heard this from other students? Are you a student at this school ?
/r/MensRights05/02/22 10:15 PM
-1

It really is that cut and dry. The amount of “you did absolutely nothing wrong” in this thread is gross.
/r/MensRights23/01/22 03:09 PM
2

You should never find yourself in a situation where someone says they’d like to stop, and then you convince them to continue. You both acknowledge that she did not want to continue and verbally expressed that to you, AND that she was very drunk. Sounds like you did do something a bit sketchy.
/r/MensRights23/01/22 03:08 PM
1

Weak.
/r/MensRights29/02/20 03:18 AM
1

No women was ever succesful? Where did I ever say that? What are you talking about?
/r/MensRights29/02/20 02:26 AM
1

That's not an opinion, that is statistical. Women are statistically biased against. You can measure levels of disagreeableness, and then measure how successful they are. You can't say that men succeed because they are disagreeable, if when a woman is disagreeable she does not also succeed. What are the different variables here? It's gender. That shows societal bias. I have no idea what the rest of your comment means.
/r/MensRights29/02/20 02:22 AM
1

Did you read that study? It said the same behavior - disagreeableness - is rewarded in men but punished in women. This is exactly the kind of thing I'm talking about. “If you’re a disagreeable man, you’re considered a tough negotiator, the perception is that if a woman is agreeable, she gets taken advantage of, and if she is disagreeable, she’s considered a control freak or ‘the B-word. In the workplace if a man is disagreeable it's a good thing, but if a woman is disagreeable it's a bad thing. …
/r/MensRights29/02/20 01:41 AM
1

That's not an answer to my question. Does their not asking for a raise mean they have not performed at their job well enough to deserve a raise? Why should I have to ask for a raise? Shouldn't good work be rewarded? What does the phrase "pre-existing wages" mean? Again, do you have any sources for these claims?
/r/MensRights29/02/20 12:55 AM
1

pre existing wages What does this phrase mean? Again, do you have any sources for these claims? Does whether or not someone will bring up the topic of getting a raise in a meeting, have any bearing on whether or not they deserve one? Why should I have to ask for a raise? Shouldn't good work be rewarded? Edit: a word
/r/MensRights28/02/20 11:32 PM
1

I don't deny that. I totally accept that men work longer hours. Refer to my last comment. As an aside the study the article you referenced linked to had women at 7.8hrs and men at 8.2. That's not "the longest by a long shot", that's "slightly longer." Society often views men as the workers and women as caretakers in the family. Could these expectations play a role in why men feel pressured to put work first and women feel pressured to put family first? I am curious about evidence on men being mo…
/r/MensRights28/02/20 08:55 PM
1

A lot of male shelters got shafted because feminists banned them more or less. Do you have any examples of this that you could share? What about the fact that 15% of shelters arent mens. Doesn't this mean that 85% of them are men's shelters? Are there any legitimate reasons for some shelters to be for women only? What about shelters being male only? 15% of fathers are single fathers. I think you misinterpreted the study here. It actually said 15% of single family households are led by men, not 1…
/r/MensRights28/02/20 05:44 PM
1

Who was this person? Do you have any studies or evidence to back up your claims? Society often views men as the workers and women as caretakers in the family. Could these expectations play a role in whg men feel pressured to put work first and women feel pressured to put family first?
/r/MensRights28/02/20 05:38 PM
1

They care about so much about male issues that they deny male shelters? If men care so much about male issues then why don't they build more male shelters? See? This is a terrible argument. There are good reasons for having separate men's and women's shelters. Also, social work is woefully underfunded. This is more of an issue of lack of money. You're basically saying "they don't care about these problems because these problems still exist." Do people fighting for nuclear disarmament not really …
/r/MensRights28/02/20 04:11 PM
1

Lets say womens jobs get paid the same.There will still be a wage gap.And yes feminists do think that. How does that make sense. If women are paid the same as men, then the wage gap does not exist. They LITTEARLY THINK AC IS SEXIST. Yeah and some men's rights activists think that all women are succubi who want nothing but to remove their life essence. Does this mean it is reflective of the beliefs of everyone that thinks men's issues are a serious concern? No. Both are a small subset of their re…
/r/MensRights28/02/20 04:07 PM
1

Where did I say all male jobs? I specifically used language that left the possibility of some male jobs being undercompensated. I agree that there are many jobs that pay less than teachers and are male dominated. That is not relevant to my point since those jobs are also included in the averaging that show men, on average, are paid more than women. Jobs traditionally held by women are, on average, compensated less than jobs traditionally held by men. That does not mean there are not men that are…
/r/MensRights28/02/20 04:03 PM
1

The title of the original post said that women make less money largely as a result of decisions they make, and then asked why the pay gap was men's fault. My entire point is that no feminist thinks that the pay gap is the fault of any specific man or group of men, but rather the result of a system that tends to favor masculine traits. Then, if we accept that women often choose careers that pay less, the next question is simply "why?" Women are not dumber than men, they don't work less hard than …
/r/MensRights28/02/20 03:56 PM
1

Patriarchy isnt on purpose paying men better Yes you are 100% correct. There is very rarely a conscious decision making process of purposeful action that causes women to be paid less. Rather, it is a systemic problem. If we can agree that there is no one sitting down and deciding to pay professions with women less than men, and we can agree that job difficulty and pay are in no way related, then we come back to the question of why are jobs typically filled by women valued less by society? (anoth…
/r/MensRights28/02/20 03:40 PM
1

that patriarchy BS is purposfully plotting against women. I never said anything close to that. In fact, I literally said that the patriarchy does not involve conscious decisions. Much of the way men suffer at the hands of the law is the result of patriarchal concepts. Women often get better treatment in regards to child custody because as a society we see them as caregivers and not men. Men also tend to get harsher sentences for the same crimes as women because society see's men as more dangerou…
/r/MensRights28/02/20 03:36 PM
1

Both of those things can be true at the same time. My main point was that job difficulty and how much someone is paid are rarely related. You seemed to think that was bullshit, but have now come around. That's fantastic.
/r/MensRights28/02/20 03:27 PM
1

Exactly! That proves my point. How much someone is paid is in no way reflective of how difficult a job is.
/r/MensRights28/02/20 05:24 AM
1

You never said that to me. And you didn't answer any of my direct questions.
/r/MensRights28/02/20 05:21 AM
1

You keep saying that... By what metric? How are you determining this? I was a software developer for years, was very well paid, and frankly did not work that hard. My job also did not require any formal education to get.
/r/MensRights27/02/20 06:20 PM
1

Its easy being a musical teachers compared to being an engineer yes. By what metric? How are you so confidently proclaiming this? Many engineers can begin work right out of college. Music teachers must undergo graduate school. They require more education. Also why are you specifically name-checking music teachers. We were talking about teachers generally, why get specific? Have you been a teacher? Have you been an engineer? Earlier you said that there were somehow both too many teachers and too …
/r/MensRights27/02/20 06:18 PM
1

I'm sure it is. And they should certainly be paid more for their labor. So now we agree that "competition favors male traits" in no way explains why traditionally female jobs are compensated less.
/r/MensRights27/02/20 06:08 PM
1

I was talking about how jobs traditionally held by women are paid less. As a response, you said that competition favors male traits. But here, you are talking about men getting paid less than women. What happened to them being favoured by competition? There is zero logical consistency here between the two arguments you are making.
/r/MensRights27/02/20 06:03 PM
1

They are paid less because they are paid less. This is a tautology and useless as an argument, especially since we are specifically discussing why this is the case. STEM fields were paid more even before men occupied them When were STEM fields ever primarily occupied by women and also paid more than other jobs? Do you have any evidence to back this up? You're ignoring my main critique, why do we pay people in STEM fields more than in fields traditionally filled by women? Computers and engineerin…
/r/MensRights27/02/20 06:00 PM
1

Wait, what the fuck? You made literally the EXACT OPPOSITE POINT in a thread with me. Over there you said that competition favors male traits, and that is why men tend to be in careers that pay more than women. https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/f9rziv/if_the_pay_gap_is_largely_accounted_for_by_womens/fixrrp9/?context=3 Holy shit you have zero credibility.
/r/MensRights27/02/20 05:56 PM
1

I'm not being purposefully ignorant. I don't see how that relates to my point about traditionally female careers being paid less. If anything, it seems to invalidate your own assertion that feminists believe "society hates women."
/r/MensRights27/02/20 05:53 PM
1

Do you have a response to my other comment? Has it made you think question your belief that paying teachers more will "do nothing to improve the quality of education?" Do you now acknowledge that there is lack of teachers in the US?
/r/MensRights27/02/20 05:14 PM
1

How does this relate to the point I made about traditionally female careers being paid less? You said: But it isnt because society hates women. And I responded by pointing out that the system we have created favors masculine traits. You agreed with me (albeit while being extremely sarcastic). Do you acknowledge that your initial statement was a misrepresentation of the beliefs of most feminists? Do you have any thoughts on why careers that typically have more women in them are paid less than car…
/r/MensRights27/02/20 05:12 PM
1

it doesn't negate the fact that teachers, in general, don't have a particularly rare skill set. The years of education required to be a teacher would suggest otherwise. You did not address any of my direct questions or the point that I made showing that we are in fact in need of teachers right now. Simply paying teachers more will do nothing to improve quality of education. What are you basing this off of? All evidence seems to suggest the contrary. https://psmag.com/education/what-do-teacher-sa…
/r/MensRights27/02/20 01:18 AM
1

I'm not sure how a market with both too many teachers and too many open teaching positioms could exist. Seems like a contradiction. Nevertheless, none of what you said is true. There is a lack of teachers around the US right now. Low pay is often cited as one of the reasons for this: fee.org/articles/the-teacher-shortage-is-real-and-about-to-get-much-worse-heres-why//amp According to research by the Economic Policy Institute (EPI), the teacher shortage could reach 200,000 by 2025, up from 110,00…
/r/MensRights27/02/20 12:45 AM
1

That's totally true about male teachers. That does not negate anything I said. Teachers are traditionally more often women than men. Many other professions that are typically more female than male are paid less. Is there a reason for this? I never said society "hates women." The common feminist idea of the patriarchy is simply a system that favors men and male traits more than women and female traits.
/r/MensRights27/02/20 12:40 AM
1

I don't think feminists consider the pay gay to exist as a result of "the doing of men" as that seems to imply a conscious decision making processes. Rather, the argument is that a system that tends to favor men is at fault. As it relates to this example, the deeper question is why are the careers that women tend to choose paid less than the careers men tend to choose? Why do we as a society pay people like teachers and social workers less than other careers?
/r/MensRights26/02/20 06:23 PM
2

Or third possibility, OP is extremely ignorant about sex, as displayed by their belief that it is impossible for someone to have HIV/stds if they say they are a virgin and, to paraphrase OP, "don't look like crack whores". That alone is some ignorant shit. Normal people can get STDs. OP has consistently displayed a lack of basic sexual knowledge.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/19 11:53 PM
1

Your last point may be true, but I'm 100% certain that not all sexually active men know that it is possible to impregnate someone without having an orgasm.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/19 11:50 PM
-3

It's not obvious it was a joke. Especially in a thread where you're telling a "oh yeah I'm sure that happened" level story about having sex in a hostel. Every post of yours is a fucking Poe - in short: without a clear indicator of the author's intent, it is impossible to create a parody of extreme views so obviously exaggerated that it cannot be mistaken by some readers for a sincere expression of the parodied views.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/19 11:14 PM
1

Unfortunately I think you're wrong there. Sex Ed in the US is abysmal and there are many places in this country where the things I mentioned aren't taught or talked about. Try to imagine that there are people out there who haven't had the same educational opportunities as you.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/19 11:10 PM
8

In another one of his comments he talked about how this woman couldn't have stds/HIV because she "said she was a virgin" and doesn't "look like a crack whore". That alone is some ignorant shit. Normal people get STDs. They also thought that it was impossible for her to get pregnant because he didn't have an orgasm - though unlikely it is possible to impregnate someone with pre-cum. Those were just two comments, but there were plenty others that seem to confirm my suspicion. At the very least OP …
/r/TheRedPill29/05/19 10:24 PM
1

I know, it's futile. My hope is that 1/100 teenage guys on here see's something I post and thinks "huh, maybe all women aren't trash". /u/beefthathasredmiddle is probably a lost cause, but there are others out there.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/19 06:10 PM
9

The odds are not as laughably low as you think they are. With your cavalier attitude about sexual health, I'm sure you'll learn this the hard way.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/19 06:04 PM
0

A. I know that's what you said, how does admitting you said something stupid support your position. Point A is useless and makes no sense in this context. B. Why not say that? Clear communication is integral to having positive sexual experiences. C. I wanted her to give me head, so saying I didn’t cum might provoke her to give me head. Now you're openly admitting to trying to coerce someone into doing something sexual that they don't really want to do? You sure seem like an upstanding, righteous…
/r/TheRedPill29/05/19 05:55 PM
11

Yeah, one would think it is common sense, but "Bro I ain’t out here fucking crack whores" is a common refrain heard from guys that don't bother getting tested. No one thinks the person they are having sex with has a disease. You're using trash logic, and you know it.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/19 05:45 PM
1

Where could I have possibly gotten that idea, maybe from the literal post we're commenting on? Nope, she was talking about the child that I had apparently given her just that moment. I was like “you know I didn’t cum right?”... guess she didn’t know. Now if you knew she could get pregnant even if you didn't cum, then why did you say that to her after she implied she may be pregnant?
/r/TheRedPill29/05/19 05:43 PM
-5

If this is your way of saying "it's a joke dude", then just edit your original comment to include an /s.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/19 05:29 PM
1

OK, then edit all your comments where you said she couldn't get pregnant to reflect this and never use that reasoning again.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/19 05:28 PM
1

You said you couldn't get her pregnant because you didn't cum. I'm telling you that is not the case. Do you disagree? Do you still think it is impossible for women to get pregnant is the man doesn't have an orgasm?
/r/TheRedPill29/05/19 05:25 PM
8

Interesting coming from the guy who literally said in another comment that this woman couldn't have HIV/STDS because she "said she was a virgin" and doesn't look like a crack whore so obviously she's never used needles in her life.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/19 05:23 PM
19

Bro if you think only people who are visibly on drugs are on drugs or have used drugs, you are woefully misinformed. This is exactly how people get HIV. "She said she was a virgin" "she didn't look like she had HIV" are the dumbest fucking reasons I've heard in my life. Get tested ASAP, and then again in a few months as it can take time for the infection to reach testable levels. Getting tested for HIV takes literally 15 minutes. If you don't do it at least every 6 months (if you're not in a mon…
/r/TheRedPill29/05/19 05:21 PM
9

Ok you're sounding more and more like someone that has never had sex. Your dick doesn't just stay "rock hard" indefinitely after sex. If you're fucking someone, cum, and then stay inside of them for a bit post-coital closeness/grounding, you will eventually get soft. Dicks don't just stay hard all day with no stimulation.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/19 05:19 PM
5

Jesus Christ dude then stop jerking off so hard. "But I can't cum!", yeah because you continue to iron grip your dick. You probably won't cum for a while as your dick gets used to a normal level of stimulation. Masturbating isn't in and of itself an issue, but you have said yourself that in multiple situations it has prevented your from fully enjoying a sexual experience. This problem will not get better if you ignore it.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/19 05:17 PM
39

Yeah but based on your post you were porbably pretty easy to spot as someone that doesn't have a lot of sex.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/19 05:13 PM
11

Pre-cum contains semen. You can get someone pregnant without having a big ol' cumshot/orgasm. Now, it's severely unlikely, and most of the sperm in pre-cum is dead/nonmobile, but it can happen. The moral of my post is always wear a condom/pulling out is not a good way to go even if your timing is impeccable. The moral of your post is that you're an idiot.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/19 05:11 PM
1

It would be a lot easier if you just posted statistics from a source you thought was reliable.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/19 05:18 AM
1

But while I'm sure this has happened a few times, I have not seen any credible evidence that suggests any significant portion of sexual assaults convictions are the result of false accusations I fail to see the relevance of his case. It's one case. Please supply any studies you have on false accusation statistics.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/19 03:52 AM
0

I never made the 2-3% claim. I never made any claim except the numbers are "laughably low". Feel free to post any studies you think treat this subject matter fairly and without bias. If your contention is that all research on this is biased then there's nothing to discuss since you've made your position unfalsifiable. I also specifically said wrongful convictions have no relevance here since that doesn't mean the sexual assault took place. Wrongful convictions are a much more complicated topic t…
/r/TheRedPill22/05/19 03:50 AM
1

I never said any numbers or referenced any stats. I'm encouraging /u/IRunYourRiver to do their own research because I know no matter what I post in here, it'll be downvoted unless it somehow confirms that false accusations are super prevalent. Feel free to post any studies you think are relevant.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/19 03:47 AM
1

I was describing the people /u/Imperator_Red was describing. They were saying that in this weird twighlight zone of RP, women - particularly queer women - are given this unholy power, when in reality they are an oppressed group. At least that's how I interpreted it. They seemed to be going against what the person they replied to was saying, and I was agreeing with /u/Imperator_Red in that this sub has a tendency to overstate the social power of traditionally powerless groups.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/19 03:45 AM
1

I was directing /u/IRunYourRiver as to how they might best work through some of their skepticism. I'm not going to waste my time posting stats on here that will just end up in a downvote storm.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/19 03:42 AM
-1

"You see it's actually women who are in control and MEN are the oppressed people. We're out here fighting for equality!" What the fuck kind of mental gymnastics are these people doing.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/19 05:41 PM
-3

If she freaks out that's because your girlfriend sucks, not because women do.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/19 05:38 PM
1

Do you have any sources to support your claim that a woman lying is "(much) more likely" than a man lying?
/r/TheRedPill21/05/19 05:37 PM
3

Just look at the actual numbers on false reports. It's laughably low. This is a case of confirmation bias where you (speaking generally, not about you personally) remember the things that support your worldview and gloss over things that don't. We all do this, and unfortunately knowing we do this doesn't make it that much better. Approach your own beliefs with the same degree of skepticism you approach accusations of sexual assault. Introspection is important and it's not weak to change your bel…
/r/TheRedPill21/05/19 05:35 PM
1

I don't do it regularly, but from time to time enjoy a good straight razor shave. My dad taught me to shave with one and then after I "mastered" that I moved onto safety razors, multiblades, etc. It's one of those things where the process is meditative and relaxing. If you don't want to risk cutting your face up while learning, get a nice shave at a barber some time, it's divine.
/r/MGTOW21/01/19 03:58 PM
10

While you're learning to shave, you should also pick up a book on punctuation and grammar. Shaving a balloon is how professional barbers practice. Don't be a twat to people trying to prevent you from permanently scarring you face.
/r/MGTOW21/01/19 03:56 PM
3

It means your username is an accurate representation of who you are. They're calling you an autist.
/r/MGTOW21/01/19 03:54 PM
2

This was based on a survey of 54 paid participants in an online study - source. This is hardly an "epidemic" as some other commenters have written. Since false reports of sexual assault are not more common than false reports of other kinds of crime, this result might say more about public misperceptions than it does the actual concerns of a bystander. Actual study
/r/MensRights12/11/18 01:15 AM
1

Seriously, it's nonsensical.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/18 03:43 PM
1

Yeah, if you drive around one of th emost populous cities in the world during commuting hours, there will be terrible traffic. If you plan your trips around the ebb and flow of people getting to/from their jobs, you won't have an issue. I'm arguing most people are good, some are shit, not the other way around. Ah yes, the Vanderbilt estates and the rolling lawns of the Old Mansions on the north shore just reek New Money. And those upstarts on Gardiner's Island with their land deed from 1639, cle…
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/18 03:42 PM
1

Long Islanders are awful -> LI is awful -> LI has some problems -> There's plenty of nice people, I like to go and visit, but it's got some issues... It would seem what you're saying is, Long Island is a place. Being a place, there are good parts and bad parts. So you're not really saying anything at all. If you go to any local sub, you'll find plenty of people that say there is "a surplus" of shittiness in their area. SF has the Tenderloin, NYC has Brownsville and East New York, Paris has de Pe…
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/18 03:24 PM
1

You said LI is full of awful people. I challenged that idea. You then said that compared to places that are more affluent than LI, LI itself is awful, which is both a separate argument and non-sensical since it is basically saying "compared to better places it's worse". People tend to give you the energy you put off. If you've found every person on LI to be an "awful" person, there's one unifying factor between them besides being from the same place, they all have to deal with you. If everywhere…
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/18 03:12 PM
0

So what I'm hearing is "when you compare Long Island as a whole to the rest of the country, it's great. But compared to some of the most affluent counties in the country, it's a terrible place to live". Bro, do you even tautology?
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/18 02:50 PM
4

Yeah and LI is not one of those places. If you had some shitty interactions, that sucks, maybe you were just in a shitty part of the island. But go fuck yourself if you think the entire 3 million person population of an 112 mile long island is "guttertrash".
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/18 02:40 PM
2

Long Island is an amazing place to live, grow up, or raise a family. I don't know where you were at - and there are certainly bad places like anywhere else - but having lived on/around LI most of my life, I can say that your assessment is categorically false.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/18 02:39 PM
4

There is not a single redeeming quality about LI, aside from Hofstra University. Wine country, world class beaches, fantastic bars/restuarants, access to NYC via the LIRR, Shelter Island, the hamptons, Montauk, fantastic state parks, niche communities, multiple high quality universites/colleges... I could go on. Just because you picked a shitty part of it to live, doesn't mean a 112 mile long island of 3 million people is all terrible everywhere.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/18 02:37 PM
0

99% of people still leaves 1% which in Canada alone would be around 360,000. I'm not a fan of her music, but clearly she has a following.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/17 05:47 PM
0

Just because you don't like her music doesn't mean no one does. There's plenty of music that I truly enjoy that many people would consider unlistenable garbage, just as I'm sure somewhere in your library are songs I would consider unforgivably bad. To that end your "real question" isn't a question at all since the answer is "different strokes for different folks". The music industry is just that, an industry, and if people weren't buying and listening to her music they wouldn't continue to suppo…
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/17 04:52 PM
1

/r/lewronggeneration If you can't find music today that you enjoy that's your fault. We live in an age where anyone can record and put out an album that anyone with an internet connection can find and listen to. Does this mean there is a lot of shitty music out there? Hell yes. But there's also a ton of stuff that a decade ago would have gotten no exposure. I have no idea what kind of music you listen to so I'm not going to venture any suggestions, but there are people actively recording in ever…
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/17 03:57 PM
1

Hey I didn't make up this fallacy I'm just explaining it, and even your example sort of serves to prove my point. You even agree that technically I'm correct. (The following numbers are entirely pulled out of my butt) One expert saying something is true give it like a 80% chance of it being true. Two experts and now maybe it's 85%, 10 and we're up to 90% another 100 to get to 95% and on and on asymptotically approaching 100%. One person doesn't make it true, a bunch of people make it extremely l…
/r/MensRights09/08/17 09:57 PM
1

That's an excellent point. If someone uses a logical fallacy when making an argument, it does not necessarily mean that they are definitely wrong, just that their logic is faulty. Assuming that someone is wrong just because they used a logical fallacy is actually called the fallacy fallacy. To use your example, an expert on brain cancer saying you have brain cancer is probably true, but if we are sticking to strictly formal logic, it is not definitely true. You have brain cancer because you have…
/r/MensRights09/08/17 08:44 PM
4

Not true. If I said I knew a climate scientist that didn't believe in anthropogenic global warming, that would still be an "appeal to authority" logical fallacy even though it is ostensibly their area of expertise. In fact, the opposite of what you said is true, this fallacy in its purest form is when someone is an expert on the topic being discussed The argument is a defeasible argument and a statistical syllogism taking the form: X is an expert on subject Y, X claims A. (A is within subject Y.…
/r/MensRights09/08/17 04:12 PM
7

Your logical fallacy is appeal to authority.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 04:04 PM
1

Who is in the picture? The article says the father was 23.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 07:33 PM
2

Did anyone here actually read this fucking article? The title is blatant clickbait with little reflection of the truth. From the article: A statement posted on OUSU’s [Oxford University Student Union] website said: “In light of the factual inaccuracies published, we would like to highlight that our support for trans students includes respecting neopronouns and non-binary identities. “We would also like to clearly state that we would never tell anyone to use ‘ze’ pronouns instead of ‘he’ or ‘she’…
/r/MensRights13/12/16 07:16 PM
3

Another random quirk. Imagine someone cuts you off, forcing you off the road and you crash. If you swerved to avoid them, made no contact with their vehicle, and then crashed into something, it's a really fucking hard case to prove. This would be an example of when a dash cam would really help. Assuming there isn't footage of the accident, all it would take is a small scratch or dent from contact form their car for youto be able to make a claim. Now, is it practical when being cut off and trying…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/10/16 08:41 PM
3

I see some people saying "This is why I invested in a dash cam". OK, dashcams are fantastic and can really help in ambiguous situations, but this situation is not ambiguous at all. I do not work in insurance, but both of my parents did growing up, so a lot of our dinner conversations were about describing accidents and then discussing fault (My mom's job was essentially to determine who was at fault and at what percentage - it isn't always 100% one person, could be 30/70 or something like that).…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/10/16 05:25 PM
1

I haven't tagged someone in a while, but you have truly earned the appellation "misogynist dickbag".
/r/PussyPassDenied19/05/16 01:38 PM
6

That's cool and all, but what was the mod actually referring to? I didn't see any comments on male circumcision.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 06:08 AM
1

Alright dude, you're clearly just trolling at this point.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 07:59 PM
1

That's not a social issue. That's one discrete experience.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 06:50 PM
1

I know that's my quote. I'm saying that that topic has no relevance to my original questioning, and just because I chose to engage you before does not mean that our disagreements on that subject in any way relate to what I am trying to figure out. AND THAT'S NOT AN ANSWER! WHAT IS THE SOCIAL ISSUE? WHAT IS AT PLAY HERE THAT MAKES THIS A SOCIAL ISSUE AND NOT A WOMAN BEING A BITCH?
/r/MensRights18/05/15 06:44 PM
1

right, being falsely of raping someone is a male issue because in a vast majority of the cases it is a man that is accused of using his penis, and putting it somewhere that someone else doesn't want it. BUT AGAIN, YOU ARE FAILING TO ADDRESS MY ACTUAL QUESTION AND FIXATING ON A TOPIC YOU BROUGHT UP THAT IS OF LITTLE RELEVANCE.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 06:32 PM
1

I never said that nor did I imply it. I asked how this was a male issue, and not jut one woman being a bitch. Then you said "Just because it doesn't affect males only doesn't make it [not] a male issue." To which I said "Ok, but not everything that affects men is a male issue.." You said "It affects males. That makes it a male issue." I provided my example of global warming. and you replied "OK then it's a social problem that affects males too" But you still haven't said what the problem is. All…
/r/MensRights18/05/15 06:15 PM
1

Well you just dropped them and jumped ship to the one that seemed to hold some water. What fallacy is that? Assuming that raping someone with a penis can only be done by someone with a penis?
/r/MensRights18/05/15 04:23 PM
1

So I'll assume you're conceding that the other 3 points you made were irrelevant. In the case of the rape, it's a male issue because the form of rape that he is being accused of is something that only a male could do, and is therefore necessarily a male problem. In this case, there could just have easily been a girl/woman sitting there being accused of harassment.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 03:42 PM
1

No, because mattress girl was actively championed by some feminists and as you said, men get 90% of false rape accusations - whereas I wouldn't say a majority of the people on the receiving end of bitching are men and domestic violence against men is by definition a men's issue, as is the case of the girl banning men. So none of your examples are fair analogies since at some point in all of them male culture is brought up, but in this case no one anywhere mentioned anything about being male. It'…
/r/MensRights18/05/15 02:09 PM
1

But it's not a social issue, it's a single bitch.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 01:31 AM
1

Which, back to my original point, would me it isn't a "male issue", just a case of one woman being a bitch to one man.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 12:16 AM
1

Because it seems like the opposite is just as true, and not everything that affects men is a male issue. Edit: Eg. Global warming - effects men, not a male issue.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 11:08 PM
1

OK, but that brings me back to my original point, what makes this a male issue? Are you saying that everything that effects men is a male issue? Because it seems like the opposite is just as true, and not everything that affects men is a male issue. Edit: a word
/r/MensRights17/05/15 10:58 PM
1

The boy was being accused of harassment for being a male while sitting and then denied the service he is paying for (couseling). When did being male come into play?
/r/MensRights17/05/15 10:32 PM
16

We don't know if she's a "feminist", it looks like she's just a bitch. Just as it is possible for men to be dicks without it being the result of patriarchy, it possible for women to be bad people without the cause being feminism.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 05:58 PM
-10

What does this have to do with mens rights? It seems like this is just another "aw shucks women sure are crazy" post. And why the feminism tag?
/r/MensRights16/05/15 05:41 PM
0

Then why say it at all?
/r/MensRights19/03/13 12:03 AM
7

"Men, as a reasonable and intelligent gender," Does this sort of imply that there are genders that are neither intelligent nor reasonable?
/r/MensRights18/03/13 05:19 PM
2

I'm curious to see if there is a greater representation of single fathers in the prison population than in the US population. It could be that men who are more likely to go to prison are also more likely to have children. If this is the case, you could still do some simple stats and weed out the difference between the general population and those in prison and get some more concrete data than what we have now.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 03:33 PM
2

I'm glad there's a level of dialogue between these subreddits, it is a step in the right direction.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 01:49 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter