TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheisticEvolution4TW Archive

View 0 posts and 156 comments by TheisticEvolution4TW on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

What should the response be to someone who mustache shames men? For instance the inevitable "you look like a rapist/pedophile" etc.
/r/MensRights22/10/13 01:00 PM
0

Don't forget that men often get more upset about unfairness than just getting beaten. It's more likely the fear is that for instance in a setting where a qualified woman and a qualified man are both vying for the same job - a few eyelash bats and a little cleavage will go a long way. That's why men get threatened by success. It's because their partner plays the system and hasn't really "earned" it and men can't do that (or rarely can). A lot of people find this sexist but in reality I've spoken …
/r/MensRights03/09/13 02:16 PM
2

Seriously need to define where spanking becomes beating? As far as I'm concerned the reason why people 'spank' on kids bums is because that's the one place no one will ever check. Uh, yeah that must be it. It's because it's padded and absorbs the swat but still stings enough temporarily to get the point across. 1) Expressing dominance over children in any form is not basal. The reason why children are so disobedient especially towards their parents is because parents do not have dominance over t…
/r/MensRights09/08/13 08:24 PM
1

A gentle spanking? YES MINISTAH!!! PLEASE SPANK ME MINISTAH! No but seriously, it has to somewhat sting to deter the child from committing offense going forward.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 07:55 PM
2

Straight up, those parents were beating their children, not spanking them.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 04:37 PM
2

Spanking on bums. Basically.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 04:34 PM
0

So discipline is any form of discipline other than physical? I disagree. There is a modicum of effective discipline you can achieve from slight physical correction. I said slight.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 03:53 PM
-1

Wrong. Violent abuse is not discipline, it's abuse.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 03:14 PM
-5

Not disciplining children (boys) is the feminization of society at work. Treating boys like girls; and you don't hit girls, right guys? Discipline =/= abuse. Stop framing it as such.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 02:04 PM
3

It's a human rights movement. For all intents and purposes. Gender is pretty much irrelevant except that it polarizes and frames the injustices. Which is what the radfems don't get. I try to stay neutral as much as possible. I support men's rights, I support women's rights, minority rights, etc and the best way to do it is to bring up MR issues without using gender. Everyone just thinks you're talking about women's problems and then SURPRISE, nope. That really rattles people. You can do it with …
/r/MensRights08/08/13 08:05 PM
5

Movember is even worse and is dominated by cracks about pedophilia, child molesters, rapists, etc. All I want to do is raise money and awareness for men's issues and have to put up with being told I look like a criminal. Imagine to yourself, just for a moment, that an actual victim of child sexual abuse wanted to join into Movember, grow a moustache etc and people all around him are basically shaming him calling him, an actual victim of child sexual abuse, a pedophile. It's basically the worst t…
/r/MensRights08/08/13 12:37 PM
2

Sexual integration is a bad idea. http://www.lewrockwell.com/2013/07/fred-reed/sexual-integration-is-a-bad-idea/
/r/MensRights30/07/13 02:17 PM
16

Don't Republicans subscribe to basically just re-swishing around disposable man tropes like "be a man, soldier", thrown in with white knight doormats and total provisioner of women, don't they? MRM isn't a left or right issue. It's a human right issue.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 06:18 PM
15

Imagine the smell. Couldn't resist.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 05:21 PM
1

Why Canada? Based on the Farrell/UoT protests and all that? EDIT: I'm Canadian
/r/MensRights06/06/13 12:48 PM
3

This is an awfully good point. Quick, somebody make a graph; axis are amount of illegitimate complaints directly correlates with standard of living in said society.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 03:50 PM
1

I mean, I think that might take another "category" for TED and for some reason I'm actually ok with TEDx as the term or paradigm for that. Just have to monitor or govern it right.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 04:44 AM
11

Graham's was TEDx - I know, not too much difference but there is a difference.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 08:44 PM
1

I assume SSS is Selective Service (IDK what the third S stands for), and it was around since way before feminism. In fact, the reason it is brought up so much is because of feminism - remember feminism wanted women to have the vote, but men only had the vote because of selective service - it wasn't a situation where when you turned 14 they measured your penis and decided how many votes you were worth based on that - it was "you get to vote because we might kill you" - and many men did die. And a…
/r/MensRights29/05/13 02:18 PM
1

The last paragraph succinctly describes how you've been acting this entire exchange regarding knowing obscure American laws. You remind me of when I was 8 and read through the entire World encyclopaedia and came across sexual reproduction. Boy was I king of the play yard that day. I'm out.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 11:54 AM
1

Yes, other countries have different laws than Canada. That's the extent...
/r/MensRights29/05/13 11:52 AM
1

Lol don't worry, when we make a movie about it I'm sure we'll make sure your part is replaced with suitable Americans :p <3 That reminds me. I still haven't seen Argo and I've been told I should... As for the second part of your reply, what's really scary is that while we don't have the SSS up here we have everything else that goes along with ingrained feminism and it's actually worse because we don't have amendment laws to protect our speech. One thing I should say about that too is that there …
/r/MensRights29/05/13 03:24 AM
0

Yeah so like I thought, you have no idea what you're talking about. Trying to insist that the vast population of Canadians should have an extended knowledge of other countries' obscure legalities of enlistment is completely asinine and laughable. It would be like claiming that we should have an understanding of the conscription laws of Australia. Why would I ever have extended knowledge of this otherwise useless info unless it were something I had actively researched out of interest or necessity…
/r/MensRights29/05/13 03:12 AM
2

We would rescue you. It would be glorious and ironic. :D So let me ask you, if it were nuclear and soldiers would be mostly irrelevant, is all the concern and hate towards a male only draft more symbolic of the greater problem of the disposable man than anything?
/r/MensRights29/05/13 02:33 AM
0

Yes because knowing whether or not the US has a registering system for its male residents to ensure their enlistment come war time pushes you past mere genius into supernaturally enlightened. Look up the word hubris. Do you see your picture beside it?
/r/MensRights29/05/13 12:18 AM
0

Wow, so you're telling me you liked to learn when you were a kid? You deserve a special medal of merit, bud.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 10:14 PM
0

So watching American TV = pays to expand your universe. Get real.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 09:59 PM
0

You knew about American selective service before coming on to this sub and discussing conscription? Who are you, Ken Jennings? Come on man.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 09:01 PM
0

I was still talking about Kuwait as the example. People being forced to serve in the military (regardless of gender) is out of necessity for survival. Again, voting is a complete banality in that instance considering there would be no country to vote for without someone protecting it.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 08:59 PM
2

No, American's fight our wars for us :D Kidding. I guess you're right. I'm only addressing situations where the chips are down and we have no alternative but to gather mass amounts of fighters against some crazy threat (like we did against the threat of Nazism in WWII) So let me ask you this. If radical [insert something here] comes to North America, wave after wave of real threats, do you think there should be a draft to fight back? Just a draft in general. Not gender specific.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 08:45 PM
0

Strawman. You've now switched from Kuwait to "the west" Kuwait could easily be overcome by baddies if they didn't have an army. It's already happened!
/r/MensRights28/05/13 08:15 PM
1

Because women physically can't pay that cost and thus, someone has to do it. I agree that it's the opposite of male privilege, but it's at the bottom of my list of examples I'd use to show male privilege is wrong-headed, considering if the chips were down and we actually had to resort to conscription, women just won't cut it and so someone has to do it and that next logical choice are people who can - men.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 08:14 PM
1

Because you think men and women are inherently equal, even physically equal? EDIT: ok forget it, not sure why I'm elusive on this. Men shouldn't play women's sports because they'd crush them.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 08:06 PM
0

What part of men shouldnt be expected to fight and die to be considered citizens do you not understand? Or, only those that do should be considered citizens? I imagine it's something along the lines of "It's a dirty job but somebody's gotta do it" or "you won't have a country to be a citizen of if you aren't willing to fight to defend it, son". Or something to that effect. Now if you're arguing that protective defense of one's land and country doesn't warrant an armed militia, I mean we can get …
/r/MensRights28/05/13 08:04 PM
0

Easy, men should not be obligated to do what we dont expect of women in order to vote. At the very least accept that women how have more voting rights than men do there. Ok now my assertion that women can't fight wars comes into play and even more so in that kind of patriarchy. So if women are physically unable to fight in the army, but they still want to give them some semblance of equality (voting for instance is a good start), what then is the recompense?
/r/MensRights28/05/13 07:50 PM
1

So do you think males should be able to play on female sports teams? How about vice versa?
/r/MensRights28/05/13 07:21 PM
1

Or they're 6 2", 240 lbs and can actually fire a weapon without falling over from the kickback...
/r/MensRights28/05/13 07:15 PM
0

Still doesn't address my assertion that women can't fight wars. So what do you suggest as recompense to make it equal in Kuwait?
/r/MensRights28/05/13 07:13 PM
-1

No, they don't. They think women who think they can handle war can handle war. Not that they can by default. Get it right.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 06:50 PM
-1

I'm not sure I understand. Isn't giving everyone the right to vote a good thing?
/r/MensRights28/05/13 06:50 PM
1

The incentive is to protect your seed and their future. Because you cannot see this, I feel it's time for me to shut this exchange down. EDIT: assholery
/r/MensRights28/05/13 06:43 PM
0

Well yeah. Canada is ten times worse than the US for feminism and it permeates into every facet of our lives - politics, education, religion, economy, you name it. Americans experience it mostly by proxy or "through the grapevine" (unless you're on this sub I guess, then you actually have anecdotes) And at least the US has some semblance of freedom of speech. So the DV shelter suicide - yeah you're right - we're all white knights up here, it's pathetic. Seriously.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 06:36 PM
1

Reason why men fight wars and not women.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 06:31 PM
1

It's all by choice. We don't have SSS like you. Yeah, of-age men could be technically drafted but probably would never happen due to sheer population ratios and our army sucks compared to cough the one to the south. We're basically already wussies by default. And it's crazy because women in general wouldn't be able to handle war. Your average, otherwise healthy woman is not as equipped to handle the battlefield and I mean that with the most gentle sensitivity towards women as possible. Most woul…
/r/MensRights28/05/13 06:27 PM
1

No it's because of biological strengths coupled with...I don't know what better way to say it so I'll just say it: womb count.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 06:22 PM
2

By choice.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 06:14 PM
1

If given the choice, the vast majority of conscripts both male and female would choose war work. So you'd be back to square one - having to actually force it.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 06:13 PM
1

Ok, well that's just crazy, dude.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 06:09 PM
2

lol, accusing a Canadian of not knowing A) shit about American selective service policy and B) male disposability, all in one sentence. Your ego knows no bounds.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 05:50 PM
1

Basically, yeah. Especially when robots will be doing all the work soon.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 05:45 PM
1

So we're then left in the quandary of how you get mass amounts of people over and above the existing military unit to serve your country if needed. If there does need to be a draft to protect the nation from attack, should women be part of the selection pool and be expected to serve alongside men?
/r/MensRights28/05/13 05:15 PM
0

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selective_Service_System Is what I was uninformed about.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 04:38 PM
1

Well now that I agree with which is why I was saying maybe draft isn't the best tactic to be using - I'd gravitate towards other tangible low hanging fruit here man, seriously. Pick your battles.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 04:30 PM
-1

I know Portugal has mandatory service and I'm sure there are other ones, but those places aren't complaining about male privilege like the ones we're addressing...
/r/MensRights28/05/13 04:27 PM
1

It was legitimate evidence 50 years ago...
/r/MensRights28/05/13 03:15 PM
1

Yeah exactly, which is why I was confused since I didn't know American males still could be draft potentials... We don't have that up here (though I wouldn't put it past US/Canada collusion to "change" that if something really crazy went down)
/r/MensRights28/05/13 03:02 PM
1

We're talking about so called male privilege - aka: it doesn't exist. I'm just being objective. There are so many more easily verifiable and obvious instances of the fallacy of male privilege, the draft is not necessarily a good example considering a number of factors like biology for instance and/or a man's strength, ability to fight/hunter-type biology - I know some guys are small and all men don't lift and for all intents and purposes there are actually many stronger women than them out there…
/r/MensRights28/05/13 02:42 PM
-2

Would you be making such a fuss about this if there were no modern draft possibility? Would you point back to the war drafts of old and cry male privilege like you are now?
/r/MensRights28/05/13 02:29 PM
4

You're not surprised a Canuck doesn't know US men can still be drafted? K
/r/MensRights28/05/13 02:20 PM
13

Canuck here. Did not know that.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 12:15 PM
-8

I think they're referring to the draft. Of men. ...50 years ago.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 12:03 PM
18

This also happens with Movember. I should start a new thread about the remarks I get when I grow my moustache.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 08:55 PM
6

Are you following the Jodi Arias "mistrial"? How long would it take for a man to be given the death penalty? A heartbeat?
/r/MensRights24/05/13 12:26 PM
4

I think he wants to know like, why is this MRM related?
/r/MensRights09/05/13 01:45 PM
3

It's another form of "the big lie". They don't believe men are stupid idiots - I don't think all feminists actually believe that. They just believe that the patriarchy is so heavily in control of all things, for instance the media, that they think the patriarchy intentionally throws these tropes out there to confuse people and downplay/cover-up the very notion that men could possibly be in control. Let me rephrase: by denigrating the male figure in movies, television, commercials, basically anyt…
/r/MensRights21/04/13 12:25 AM
1

I hold the door for everyone.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 08:56 PM
26

My ex fiancée tried to do this to me. She's my ex for a reason. Worst of all it was psychologically manipulative to the point of "you're lucky these are the only things I'd like you to 'work on' and you're lucky that I'm so understanding of your faults or else you wouldn't be able to get anyone. You should thank me for marrying you." Yeah dude. Yeah. EDIT: Oh, right. Forget to mention she was obese too and I was actually the one she was lucky to have.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 08:21 PM
2

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronic_traumatic_encephalopathy
/r/MensRights11/04/13 12:48 PM
1

There are several sexist underpinnings going on here. 1) That the boys have nothing to talk about. 2) That you didn't finish your homework on the weekend. The first thing I thought when I read it was that the boys were too busy "being boys" on the weekend that they didn't finish their homework. In other words, what would you do if you had finished up all your homework and had otherwise nothing to do? Sit there quietly at your desk doing nothing for 40 minutes? But I read it further and I've deci…
/r/MensRights10/04/13 06:44 PM
1

She's not a woman anymore.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 10:00 PM
6

Reverse it. Should a person born a woman who transitioned into a man be able to fight against a man in the octagon?
/r/MensRights05/04/13 08:25 PM
22

"I think it moved" - George Costanza
/r/MensRights05/04/13 05:29 PM
-2

I've actually never heard of this before, is this a thing? It sounds like polygamy. I think it sounds like it would be confusing to the kids...
/r/MensRights04/04/13 01:54 AM
-4

Well I can only speak for myself I just call it as I see it. My circumcised penis has not inhibited me one bit. Nor do I think it's some nefarious plot by my parents to scar me for life. On the contrary, they've done what they thought was best for me.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 07:06 PM
-5

Oh, I get it. You guys are the male equivalent of feminists. Got it.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 06:38 PM
4

I think you missed the point. What a surprise.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 06:37 PM
-3

No, it was rhetorical. We immunize babies to protect them, the same way that we circumcise male sons (outside of custom). I see a very weak link between circumcision and "disposable males" when faced with this argument. Babies don't have a say over whether they want to be pumped full of inoculation serum either. Yet that's supposedly for their own good and we're ok with that one. Parent's genuinely believe that circumcision is doing what's best (like vaccination). If that is an erroneous belief …
/r/MensRights03/04/13 05:27 PM
-4

Oooooh, our leadership lol. Looks like I've gone rogue.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 04:06 PM
-7

So why do we immunize babies?
/r/MensRights03/04/13 02:21 PM
2

That's my point. I could just say I was Jewish and so is my son. Voila, I get my son circumcised.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 01:53 PM
-10

I don't resent it. I think it's a mountain out of a molehill and I think it's 6 of one, half dozen of the other. Other MRA's disagree with me (vehemently I might add) and have adopted circumcision into their canon of MRM issues. Hey if it's one of the things you want to put on your checklist as an MRA go for it. I just have way more important MRM issues to worry about and my lack of foreskin isn't something holding me back from anything. I have no idea if being circumcised prevented me from medi…
/r/MensRights03/04/13 01:30 PM
2

I'm a social conservative on a lot of topics but I hold extremely far left, almost socialist fiscal/economic values...
/r/MensRights03/04/13 01:16 PM
-7

Brainwashing.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 12:51 PM
1

How does one "prove" they are Jewish?
/r/MensRights03/04/13 12:51 PM
1

That's nuts. But I still maintain that it wouldn't work anywhere else. I just don't feel men could handle it. Maybe if we legalized prosty's, but that's also a long shot.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 12:41 AM
1

Not really. (Born in '79). Explain.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 08:57 PM
1

I'm not trying to be cryptic, just facetious. Nothing about Japan surprises me.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 08:53 PM
2

It's Japan.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 08:43 PM
1

I'm not in favor of changing the definition of marriage but I'm fairly religious so that might count for something. I guess I shouldn't really comment on it but just one thing I will say is that I wouldn't want the pro/anti gay marriage argument to obfuscate the issue of MR (which someone already alluded to).
/r/MensRights28/03/13 08:40 PM
1

Aside from the celibacy of religious men (which aren't a factor in all of this anyway just by default) I can't see this happening in North America.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 08:24 PM
4

It would take a massive cultural change involving all men everywhere. Cut your wife/girlfriend/s.other off from sex and see what happens. There are potentially hundreds of other men waiting in line for her which she would more than gladly oblige for satisfaction. And therein lies the problem with the so called "patriarchy".
/r/MensRights28/03/13 07:43 PM
1

Well the proof is in the pudding here man. Look at what you've written and break it down logically like I have.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 07:06 PM
1

Being nice is retarded. K.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 07:05 PM
-1

Are you saying uncircumcised males don't encounter penile infection directly related to being uncircumcised? I'm going to move on. Your definition of mutilation is based upon your own perspective. The grey area ethics of modification/mutilation is nothing new. Piercing is accepted mutilation which would be termed modification. In all sorts of cultures it is custom to pierce baby's ears, nose, and other areas. That's one example of where body modification perception might change from one personal…
/r/MensRights28/03/13 06:27 PM
1

I think I've made my point.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 04:58 PM
-6

Dumping her shit off is a bit harsh. I wouldn't have done it that way myself I guess, I would have made it clear by taking the high road. I would have made it so she realized what a nice person she's abused over the years. Emotion gets in the way of that, I get it, I'm just asking to have a bit of humility here and there. Show her you're the real deal and kill her with kindness. That pisses people off a lot more than anything.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 03:51 PM
3

Well that's why this case might be a bad example - try and try and at the end of the day we shake the dust off our sandals and walk out of town. I'll buy that.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 03:47 PM
1

His reputation isn't forever tarnished as this story blew up. It's the untold stories that I would be more concerned about but that's not what I was referencing in this thread. I was referencing Matt Folino. He should feel lucky that people took note of this case. And let it be a warning in the future to the Gestapo that want to take guys out of their homes. This is a victory for men. Getting raped is not a victory for anyone.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 03:46 PM
0

Tempt fate as in if I didn't have foreskin I wouldn't have this brutal infection now despite my best efforts (or my dads) to help me keep it in check. Cutting a babies penis off would be genital mutilation. At worst, clipping the foreskin for reasons of hygiene would be harmless, pro-active modification (albeit as you say against the child's will which is a whole other realm of reasoning that is more related to parents' discretion, discipline and a whole other bunch of things you or the governme…
/r/MensRights28/03/13 03:41 PM
-2

Guy I feel bad that you've wasted 3 years on this biatch. Seriously, I do, you seem like a good dude. But she's still a human being and she probably needs psychological help. I'm not saying take her back. But don't be mean. That's her realm.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 02:55 PM
0

But why tempt fate when you can just deal with it? Chop it off and be done with it and then you don't have to worry. Or don't. It's a mountain out of a molehill afaic. I'm still trying to consider your views here, it just seems to be some sort of anal retentive "don't flush down my poop mom, IT'S MIIIINE" mentality. It's a completely non-crucial part of the human anatomy that doesn't interfere with a damn thing. You want to keep it, I don't want the extra responsibility of having it. Case closed…
/r/MensRights28/03/13 02:53 PM
-7

Of course but that doesn't mean they're not douchebags. But it also doesn't mean they aren't human beings with their own issues and feelings.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 02:26 PM
-10

Well I said to move on but to ask her if she needs help...
/r/MensRights28/03/13 02:25 PM
1

No. Courts will still pick out (or assume) the top and bottom of the relationship and favour the bottom as he would resemble the more feminine of the couple. Married to a Twink? Good luck in court. In my opinion. Downvote away.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 02:17 PM
-7

There are always underlying reasons for that behaviour and often a little love will go a long way.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 02:13 PM
-5

It doesn't mean she isn't hurting or dealing with her own problems.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 02:11 PM
0

I think the main point to remember is that men don't need foreskin. We can do without it. Like an appendix. It's not a vital part of us, we don't lose one crucial thing from it (in fact there are many benefits). I suppose you could make a check list of pros and cons. It's probably about equal except for the maintenance/cleaning of young boys I was talking about. Which can mean a lot considering the potential health issues. If you want to argue otherwise that's fine, I am currently following up o…
/r/MensRights28/03/13 02:09 PM
1

Objectivity = feminist shill. Gotcha.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 02:04 PM
1

When did I say men's suffering doesn't matter?
/r/MensRights28/03/13 02:04 PM
0

Irony: Pierce claims men aren't tougher or only act tougher than women while in the very same post basically claims "I can take rape". Makes a ton of sense...
/r/MensRights28/03/13 02:03 PM
0

Oh right. Today men aren't tougher than women, tomorrow you're complaining about coal mines and fighting wars. Gotcha.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 02:00 PM
1

Yeah for sure but he wasn't locked away for a dozen years. Context people. Context.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 01:58 PM
-20

You know man I actually feel sorry for her. She seems insecure and bossing you around is actually the only way she felt better. I mean, she's a bitch and all but look, people can be super insecure and the the only way they feel better is by putting you and others down. I wouldn't even chalk it up to feminism (although it's a very easy system to hijack for these means), I would just chalk it up to being a not nice person in general due to her own lack or perception of self worth. See if she needs…
/r/MensRights28/03/13 01:48 PM
114

Be a man servant. That's what she meant. Man servant.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 01:45 PM
-2

Also notice how I don't take the stance "because God said so". I'm not Jewish.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 03:26 PM
-3

I'm on the fence with MRA's stance on circumcision. First of all the the facts posted by the friend are just plain wrong. Foreskin contains 20,000 nerve endings? That's about a tenth more than normal skin/cutaneous layers. Foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis? Wrong. That would be the glans penis - the head. Foreskin keeps your glans clean? Wrong, it actually causes a lot of hygienic problems if not taken care of properly (whether or not you want to argue having or not having it is a…
/r/MensRights27/03/13 03:24 PM
-3

I got lambasted for the same thing. Although I do feel that being raped is worse than being accused of rape (especially since men are tougher than women, not trying to be sexist but come on, we all know it) and so yeah I would verge more to be angry with the violation of constitutional rights and perhaps the lasting effects that the assumptions of the Gestapo might have on his future trust of the "system" for instance. If anything we've got a new MRA recruit out of all this... But everyone - EVE…
/r/MensRights27/03/13 02:45 PM
1

lol I would NOT want to have messed with Viking women...
/r/MensRights26/03/13 04:14 PM
3

I just started watching Vikings on History channel. It's insane to think the pansies in Sweden nowadays are descendants of those rugged, bearded, masculine marauders. No doubt Ragnar is rolling in his grave. I often wonder if dispelling certain archetypal acceptances (much the same as American white folk apologizing for their slave owning relatives 300 years ago) is a factor in cases like these. Then again, this is the same country that gave us ABBA...
/r/MensRights26/03/13 12:07 AM
4

Game over man!
/r/MensRights25/03/13 10:26 PM
4

lol I love how I was downvoted. Gotta remember that pesky [/s] from now on.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 06:19 PM
8

Nah, mom's got it covered.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 06:17 PM
1

That's assuming the convicts are not reformed upon exiting the correction systems... [/s] In my opinion it all stems from people believing getting raped by Bubba in jail is part of the criminal's punishment. Not even a "joke" as you infer - actually part of the punishment for the crime. Like, interwoven into the system.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 06:15 PM
2

Wait, men get raped?
/r/MensRights22/03/13 04:37 PM
1

Yep, exactly. People always talk about oh the big bad employer like this sense of entitlement to do whatever they want even at the detriment of the employer and the labor boards will cater to the employee (they often do). But there is definitely a line and a case like hers could be where it is...
/r/MensRights21/03/13 03:50 PM
2

Wow. Well it looks to me like the Sendgrid product is better then. Nobody charges those prices without some sort of technical advantage/efficiency. Now, the advantage in this case could be that Amazon if effing loaded and can get away with much lower charges. A lot of massive multi-nationals do this just because they can. You see this all the time with big box stores putting small mom and pops out of business. Course their stuff is made in China...
/r/MensRights21/03/13 03:49 PM
5

Wait, what? What was the lesson from the Farrell talk? Did I miss something?
/r/MensRights21/03/13 02:32 PM
9

As if developers don't already have a shitty enough work environment eh? Furthermore if they're all basically on our side, how could you ever interact with her ever again? She shows up to the company Christmas party and it's game over, Captain Buzzkill's here... How can you possibly believe keeping someone that disengaging to other employees is a good thing?
/r/MensRights21/03/13 02:30 PM
1

Well I'm a bit of a shill for Amazon I admit (I don't work for them honestly) but again I like the fact that they're about as diverse as it gets and of course cutting down on the amount of paper used in books is something I like (also strats for paperless and doc ret is big right now). On the other hand I do like to support the little guys instead of the big monster conglomerates. I'm not sure how you feel about that. I guess it sort of depends on how crucial the technology is at your organizati…
/r/MensRights21/03/13 02:24 PM
2

This is seriously the best way to do it (and boycott PlayHaven as well, the company that fired him). Amazon is a staple and I don't think their SLAs are really that hard to decipher. I actually just like and support Amazon, I'm a fan of Kindles etc, I'm a bit of an environmentalist so anything to help reduce pulp/paper (such as electronic reading devices) is a-ok in my books. I also hear a buzz about ManDrill as another option. Unfortunately for us Sendgrid provides a pretty good service. It's k…
/r/MensRights21/03/13 01:13 PM
1

That's what our policy is. I think it's "let go without cause" - it's written right into our termination policy to allow us to arbitrarily let someone go if they're not a fit in the organization (private company though)
/r/MensRights21/03/13 12:43 PM
3

I would just let nature take its course. I stated yesterday that a wide swath of IT people (potential Sendgrid customers) are male. Guys like us. Dick and fart joke guys. Guys who don't put up with this sissy crap. You think they need some type of intervention or boycott of Sendgrid? They'll do it on their own, believe me. I'm in IT sales. disgonbegood.gif
/r/MensRights21/03/13 12:12 PM
3

Individuals in my company have been canned for less. So yeah.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 11:58 AM
3

I suppose she could try to fight it but at the end of the day it's not wrongful dismissal and it's not sexist. Her actions have repercussions - I can't just go around making dumb decisions costing my company money and expect to play a sexist card. There's nothing sexist about the stupid. I maintain that it's well within Sendgrid's jurisdiction to let her go.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 11:56 AM
6

The crazy shit is that if it weren't for her actions/Donglegate and I had just seen her Twitter feed with the whole TSA sock joke I would have totally felt like she was chill and down to earth etc. The whole thing is just really bizarre and I'm still trying to figure out what her end game was here.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 02:37 AM
5

"It's the ciiiiiircle of liiiiiife"
/r/MensRights20/03/13 11:01 PM
18

I think you can fire people for jeopardizing your company's earnings.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 10:27 PM
10

If she's supposed to be the friendly go-between wouldn't it be better to have someone in that position who would properly connect with the vast contingent of male social "dweebs" at this conference? Having some awkward prat as your go-between sort of defeats the purpose of a go-between, doesn't it? Part of that "connection" with your base would be playing into their culture. I'm in sales and I typically mirror my clients and if one of them makes off colored remarks I don't cry foul to their HR d…
/r/MensRights20/03/13 09:19 PM
76

SendGrid is probably freaking out at how many IT guys are now going to drop them as a vendor. The vast majority of IT people are men. Men who aren't amused with her. Well done Adria, you just cost your company literally hundreds of thousands of dollars in lost business contracts. She should be fired on the spot.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 08:36 PM
2

But that's just it - human beings don't need their libidos micromanaged. We don't need the sex police and sorry to burst anyone's bubble - silence can be sexy. Body language can serve as consent. I can name off more if you want, but that's one avenue of confusion just right there. Another would be sexual caprice; changing ones mind after consent has been granted etc. Another would be claiming to have felt "coerced" into saying yes. The definitions are weak and you know it. How can men possibly b…
/r/MensRights20/03/13 08:06 PM
1

So if we can't even configure the term into understandable definitions, how the hell are we supposed to help stop it?
/r/MensRights20/03/13 07:41 PM
8

So why not just call it either Gender Studies or Women's Studies? Did you even check the link to the Carleton site? Why should gender studies also include "women" and not men? Do they offer a plain gender studies course? What about men's studies? If not, why not? Why should a man failing a class run by feminist women not be a concern? The fact of the matter is that anything I would submit that contradicts or counteracts the curriculum would be subject to feminist bias by the professor. This bias…
/r/MensRights20/03/13 07:26 PM
16

That's gold Jerry! GOLD!
/r/MensRights20/03/13 07:16 PM
10

This reminds me of Smoky the bear - "Only YOU can prevent forest fires". Except that Smoky isn't singling out a gender. You is the proverbial you. If it were really the responsibility of the man to understand the definition of rape because society blurs the definition of rape, wouldn't it be to rectify the way society portrays rape? How can men possibly keep up if the goal posts keep moving? Pick a definition and stick to it and then maybe you can start to teach men how not to rape based on that…
/r/MensRights20/03/13 06:16 PM
9

And you saw this posted about Ryerson: http://www.avoiceformen.com/ryerson-university-and-men/ryerson-student-union-on-the-path-of-bigotry
/r/MensRights20/03/13 05:58 PM
1

Nah, I'd give the women more credit than that, I'm not a complete misogynist, only mostly ;) Seriously though, I'd expect a class full of so called intellectuals can't consist wholly of feminists, there's gotta be a few normal girls in there, even conservative-type girls actually. All it takes is one or two to be on your side. I think men need to start taking these classes. I'd fail the class (I have a penis, so obviously), but just to watch a lot of them squirm or at best challenge them and may…
/r/MensRights20/03/13 05:56 PM
4

I'd take that course just to start firing off the tough questions and outlining the double standards. Gender studies? Yeah ok, let's study then.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 05:29 PM
3

There are radfems everywhere, and probably in the same proportion to the population. The problem in Canada is the government model and yes the Universities which promote and uphold the feminist POV instead of maintaining objectivity. As much as I dislike a lot of the culture of the US for various reasons (that you would all probably agree with, don't write me off as a hater) the US has a lot more freedom when it comes to speech law. Up here hate crimes for example are a lot stricter and punished…
/r/MensRights20/03/13 04:05 PM
2

It's the Kobayashi Maru dude. Men have to get clear consent (verbal yes) to commence with sex lest we arbitrarily be accused of rape after the fact. But if we decline sex (the female gets a verbal no) we can be accused of rape and the female is the one taken seriously. Aside from abstinence I don't see how being checkmated like this by women can't NOT create more and more MRA's. And then feminists wonder where we come from...
/r/MensRights20/03/13 02:54 PM
0

This is essentially what I said above yet you get dv'd. I don't get it.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 05:08 PM
-8

We live in a culture of vengeance, revenge, comeuppance and just deserts. In my opinion people (men and women alike) deserve justice but revelling in someone's poor judgement and mistakes that are made is just emotional tripe and all the media was really doing was saying look, these kids could have had it all and now they're screwed forever, for life, for a really bad and downright evil event they partook in. Anyone who spins that into the media somehow apologizing for their deeds is a moron, an…
/r/MensRights19/03/13 03:24 PM
14

There is partial truth to this. As it stands fatherless boys stand a much greater chance of growing up delinquent. Essentially we live within a socially accepted community of "go-it-alone" females who insist that it's just as reasonable for mom to perform both mother and father roles; work long hours without a counterpart earner and other such ridiculous, arrogant nonsense which essentially promotes the disintegration of the father role model into one of either insignificance or out-right banish…
/r/MensRights19/03/13 03:04 PM
7

Working around the house is what Saturdays are for. Weeknights are for couches.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 12:23 PM
4

It's because feminists can't actually differentiate between tongue in cheek, all in good fun "make me a sandwich" comments and actual beliefs of that nature. In fact furthermore those jokes and comments are taken as literal and are touted to play into the patriarchy mentality that our culture is obviously infused with.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 08:26 PM
1

London is shaping up to be pretty wicked too IF you can stand the months between September and April (St. Patrick's day is coming and we'll see)
/r/MensRights14/03/13 05:50 PM
1

Obligatory thatsracist.gif for good measure. I'm in London.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 05:48 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter