TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ThelemaAndLouise Archive

View 0 posts and 263 comments by ThelemaAndLouise on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

this doesn't mean they don't care, but you can tell by observing them over time that that is the case.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 08:23 PM
1

statistically speaking: yes. look at the stats.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 12:25 AM
1

it's a low income problem, but white people are catching up to blacks because welfare that incentivizes single motherhood originally targeted the black community.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 12:24 AM
1

Jordan Peterson points out that empathy for the child is what makes the mother so dangerous. and sjws are basically engaging in distorted mothering play.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 01:30 AM
1

because the left slanders their opponents by using the Marxist class struggle language they've indoctrinated their adherents into so that they do not have to engage honestly in rational discourse. this should make you sincerely question every time someone is called a Nazi, white supremacist, etc. investigate for yourself. serious fucking red pill.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 01:28 AM
3

fair enough. I'm not picking on fat women or women over 30, those are just the complaints I hear. One thing that is brutal for women I believe, is that your intrinsically interesting once you hit puberty, and so you become acclimated to heightened attention. When that gets taken away, many women have not developed tools to deal with it. on the testosterone point, an adult male doesn't experience the same testosterone a teenage boy does, so there's no way a woman has experienced anything in the r…
/r/MensRights04/08/17 11:55 AM
12

The educational system has increasingly been built around how girls learn. and the fact that some girls are medicated doesn't say much about the disparity in medicating children. it's terrible either way. As for testosterone, I was unaware they used it in hormonal birth control for women. It's unlike female hormones. You don't know the cognitive effects of testosterone unless you've experienced it. Maybe the day off for the period thing is extreme (though I've known women who have migraines with…
/r/MensRights04/08/17 02:10 AM
14

the educational system and field of child psychology (both dominated by women) are medicating young boys disproportionately. this is because they are holding boys to behavioral standards of girls. brain development is different, physical development is different. The only way you could possibly believe that women need as much tolerance in terms of aggression is if you're completely in the dark about the actual effects of testosterone. The equality you're suggesting would be if women didn't ever …
/r/MensRights04/08/17 01:43 AM
16

men and women are not held to the same standards, and boys and girls should not be held to the same standards. It's impossible, and damaging to try. Maybe you mean equivalent standards, and I agree with that. and I get what you're saying about the aggression, but part of having testosterone is aggression and the solution is to teach boys how to modulate it, not suppress it. probably having all woman teachers isnt helpful.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 01:24 AM
46

there's a difference between rough housing and actual violence. boys need to play for their cognitive development, and giving them meth to suppress their play impulse (which works on rats, btw) is crippling.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 01:12 AM
28

male mentorship has to return. we have to actually be honest with boys.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 01:10 AM
7

we're not; you are; biology.
/r/MensRights02/08/17 11:05 AM
12

I'm of the mind that male and female psychology is different, but hot fucking damn is there a sentencing disparity.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 02:32 AM
1

i don't take "people close to" sources as legitimate because of the number of times they've been proven to be a LARP in otherwise supposedly respectable journals. in any case, it doesn't say he didn't consult, just that Mattis wasn't in the room when he pulled the trigger.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 10:23 PM
2

what makes you believe that between the time mattis announced they would review and the time Trump announced reinstatement of the ban, no consultation occurred?
/r/MensRights27/07/17 09:27 PM
1

what I'm saying is many times bad people get off because they either didn't commit an actual crime, or because there were procedural mishandlings of the case. in this case, it seems like a combination of both. I'm not saying that pussy passes don't exist, but if you look at this case, there are numerous complicating factors. I'm saying the claim that there's a pussy pass lacks evidence and seems contrary to actual data.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 11:59 PM
0

your Comment was a claim that Trump and his press secretary lie all the time. it was not a question.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 10:20 PM
2

his position on punishing women for breaking abortion law was a pretty high profile and undeniable change that came from hearing the positions of others.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 09:57 PM
-1

name three lies Sanders has told
/r/MensRights26/07/17 09:55 PM
1

He doesn't listen to anyone this is verifiably false, you just have to find information somewhere beside the Democrat media complex.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 09:48 PM
1

these people probably think we should let midgets into the military. and people with diabetes. and the mentally disabled.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 09:47 PM
1

Mattis delayed the implementation of the new policy to allow for review, reported on June 30th. Trump and his press secretary say the decision was made based on that consultation. what would make you believe he had made the decision without consulting? have you paid any attention to how his administration has approached and implemented policy change?
/r/MensRights26/07/17 09:43 PM
2

read the article. The guy who read the article and watched the dateline episode on it seems to have a similar opinion. oj Simpson didn't get off because of his vagina. honestly neither did Casey Anthony. neither did George Zimmerman.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 11:07 AM
1

your emotional tone and wall of text and just general lack of chill. but okay buddy, you win the argument. you're right.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 10:51 PM
1

I think you think I'm someone else. REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!
/r/MensRights25/07/17 10:45 PM
1

I think there is some clear information I'm not.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 10:39 PM
-1

then why are you invested in it?
/r/MensRights25/07/17 10:30 PM
0

I think he's explaining why she got a light plea bargain.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 10:21 PM
3

it sounds like cops fucked up when they arrested her and it wasn't clear she was aware of her rights before they started interrogating her.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 10:20 PM
4

I think they fucked up by pressing her hard for a confession when there was clearly a language barrier. procedural mistakes ruin an entire case.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 10:19 PM
5

sounds like they fucked the case up and offered a bargain because they did.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 10:18 PM
-1

more or less
/r/MensRights17/07/17 03:20 PM
-5

I'm at least trying to prevent the downfall of western civilization
/r/MensRights17/07/17 01:12 PM
1

no, stupid. I'm someone who thinks stuffing too much shit into a child's vagina (before hormones make it particularly ready to accept a railing) can damage the sexual organ. go read a fucking book.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 10:58 AM
1

You must be speaking from your extensive experience fucking children The fact is, she can't have children as a result of the tissue damage incurred during the rape. If you want to argue semantics about whether or not her uterus itself is actually destroyed or if its surrounding tissue, that sounds like a boring conversation.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 03:19 PM
1

Indeed. I got involved because the guy defending her l said she was assigned the case, and that doesn't appear to be true. this other guy is off his rocker.
/r/MensRights14/07/17 10:20 AM
2

👍🏿
/r/MensRights14/07/17 12:01 AM
2

Its was a defelction. i never defelct
/r/MensRights13/07/17 11:34 PM
2

you've got your head up your ass, and whenever you lose ground you change the subject. Hillary came up as an example and the only reason she became a topic of discussion is morons like you came to her defense instead of understanding it was an example about the presentation of facts.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 11:27 PM
2

what claim? Hillary has presented at least two divergent accounts of the court case, and I'm inclined to believe the audio where she was laughing and speaking freely over her book, which was probably written with a team of people.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 11:25 PM
2

If you didn't want to talk about it, then why the fuck did you talk about it, stupid? Just shut the fuck up, problem solved Instead, you argued about something you claim to not care about until it became clear that you shit the bed and now you're pretending it's not worthy of discussion when your actions prove otherwise
/r/MensRights13/07/17 11:03 PM
2

If we're talking about the fucking court case we're talking about Hillary Clinton dude And slandering and threatening rape victims is pretty fucking bad.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 10:46 PM
5

Sorry I was mistaken she was not raped into a coma, her uterus was destroyed http://thefederalist.com/2016/10/11/rape-victim-hillary-clinton-laughed-blamed-getting-raped/
/r/MensRights13/07/17 10:29 PM
4

We're talking about Hillary Clinton. If she were a champion for women, you would think that she wouldn't aggressively attack a 12 year old rape victim to win a case. She is not a champion for women. I would hold someone to a different standard if their entire career weren't based on being a woman and being a champion for women. All she has is the pussy card, and she abuses women. She is far worse an abuser of women then Trump is.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 10:25 PM
1

I was molested as a 14 year old, and there are a lot worse things that have happened to me in my life. I wouldn't advise anyone to do it, but I had already been sexualized. It's a near certainty that what he said is technically correct, that some relationships between older men and underage teens are not detrimental. The thing that people took issue with, and I believe rightly so, is that the way he stated it provides an excuse for bad behavior. In any case, his opinions about this we're part of…
/r/MensRights13/07/17 10:23 PM
2

Hillary Clinton literally argued that it was okay for the man to fuck a 12 year old into a coma because she wanted it. In Milo's case, he was older, the other guy was younger, and they had a long-term relationship.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 07:33 PM
5

You're ignoring the central point of what I'm saying. You said that a judge assigned the case to her but that is not true. She voluntarily took the case. Whether or not the person who asked her to take the cases that judge is in consequential
/r/MensRights13/07/17 07:30 PM
6

He was having a conversation about his experience, and after he was called to task for what he said, he apologized for the impression that he gave and stated that he believes that sex between minors and adults is wrong
/r/MensRights13/07/17 07:29 PM
5

he called Milo a piece of shit he didn't say anything about journalistic integrity. Speaking of which, George Carlin and Lenny Bruce were not journalists. But if they had a Blog and shared a scientific study, I would probably read it.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 05:16 PM
13

It would be either a judge or a lawyer. My point is she was not compelled to do it. She chose to do it. She was not appointed. Then she chose to slut shame a 12 year old who had been raped into a coma. Then she chose to use the threat of violence to silence her husband's rape victims. Then she chose to use the fact that she's a woman for political gain based on the pretense that she is an advocate for women, when really she uses women however she sees fit.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 05:12 PM
10

Everyone is biased
/r/MensRights13/07/17 05:06 PM
17

why? is it because he's inflammatory, like George Carlin and Lenny Bruce? or because he hates feminism and Islam like Bill Maher?
/r/MensRights13/07/17 05:04 PM
12

a friend asked her to take the case because the guy requested a female lawyer. then she said the 12 year old, whom the man raped unto a coma, sought him out for sex, and so it wasn't his fault. that she was raped into a coma. It would be less of a big deal if she weren't supposedly a champion of women. Who also bullied the rape victims of her husband into silence.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 05:00 PM
11

He didn't say that. he actually has done journalistic work bringing pedophiles to justice.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 04:57 PM
4

she was in child care. it's fucking mind boggling.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 11:12 PM
3

the place I worked wanted more women and hired a woman with low skills because of her vagina. all of the places we consulted for were 3/4+ women
/r/MensRights03/07/17 07:56 PM
12

literally a 6% advantage to women. the west is so fucked
/r/MensRights03/07/17 07:52 PM
8

it's murdering a child, bro there are resources available.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 04:03 AM
16

you should, however, discourage discussion on Facebook
/r/MensRights22/06/17 11:13 PM
3

just looked it up. u right. hot, AND can defend me from terrorists. I'm into it.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 11:33 AM
1

well every Israeli is a former soldier. women spend 1 year, men 2. Did she do longer?
/r/MensRights21/06/17 11:30 AM
1

because they're based on different comic book characters?
/r/MensRights21/06/17 11:29 AM
1

juicing is a lot safer than it used to be. also, they have millions of dollars. I'd juice too.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 11:28 AM
1

some people are just built like that. I used to see an Israeli who was built like her. i mean, she's also making millions of dollars, so I don't feel too bad.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 11:27 AM
1

I don't know how standard it is across the board, but it's standard for the superhero movie contracts. they're giving a no name actor a career with a nearly guaranteed earning potential and they basically get an advance on that.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 11:25 AM
1

it's not an act of aggression, it's just rude and inconsiderate and any objection is policed with pussy.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 11:22 PM
1

well what if I feel offended by someone talking about tiny penises? can't I say what I feel?
/r/MensRights20/06/17 10:38 PM
1

the problem is humans have deficient perceptive and information processing faculties. sending someone to college just makes them a different kind of stupid than, say, a plumber. where is the society where they've stamped out stupidity?
/r/MensRights20/06/17 10:34 PM
3

I'm not a feminist, you half wit. I said there are assholes on trains. grow a fucking brain.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 06:35 AM
1

you need to see a doctor or try tucking your knees behind your ears.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 06:20 AM
2

you don't need your knees as far apart as they go. if you think you do, you should go to physical therapy.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 06:08 AM
7

it is more uncomfortable for men because our hip sockets are oriented differently. but there's variance among men. I can do it alright.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 06:06 AM
3

I've been buying decent underwear for a decade, I don't know where you shop.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 06:03 AM
3

the whole manspreading thing is dumb, but there are a lot of stupid fucks who don't need to sit like that.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 06:02 AM
6

technically white noise is random noise with equal power across the spectrum. our hearing is logarithmic, needing more power at the low end for the same amount of loudness, so white noise doesn't sound loud at the low end pink noise has power that matches the logarithmic curve of our hearing, which means there is more power at the low end. brown noise is double the pink noise curve, so it has an accumulation at the low end. In other words, if Brown noise sounded like pink noise to you, pink nois…
/r/MensRights19/06/17 05:57 AM
2

I get up in packed trains because I'm not at armpit height. unless I'm really enjoying sitting down.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 03:15 AM
1

sounds like you nailed it.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 12:43 AM
11

plus for every guy manspreading, there's another guy offering his seat to a woman during a commute. these people just want to be miserable.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 12:42 AM
2

just use the changing table. if they deny access to a service they provide to women, they are looking at a lawsuit.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 06:44 PM
4

honestly, this sign is probably more about young dudes using this restroom, as I have once or twice when I was around 20. it's just a better bathroom. i doubt they'd say anything if you went in with a kid. they probably allow women alone because of overflow in the Women's restroom, since women take longer.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 06:42 PM
3

I don't have kids but I do remember seeing something about companies being more mindful of this in the past 5 or 6 years.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 06:40 PM
0

Well MMA. The reason they divide men and women is because of bone density and muscular strength and size and other factors
/r/MensRights15/06/17 05:33 PM
0

It's not misogyny to acknowledge what every Sports League already knows
/r/MensRights15/06/17 02:49 PM
0

the one before, idiot. that's why I said previous. I'm saying the likelihood of gouged eyes is low. we're talking about why people react differently to a woman touching a man without permission, and you're so dumb you think it's reptilian mind control.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 09:53 PM
0

A veiled insult is an insult none the less. Your previous comment did not have any content in it. Either you're intellectually disingenuous which makes you a troll, or you're stupid. I gave you the benefit of the doubt.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 09:25 PM
0

God, you're fucking stupid
/r/MensRights14/06/17 04:44 PM
0

no, stupid, it's pretty fucking clear what I'm saying. go ask a 12 year old to explain it to you.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 10:44 AM
12

I like introducing people to this concept by loudly saying things like "look now a black woman is going to solve this stupid white woman's problems" as soon as I figure out the format
/r/MensRights14/06/17 12:33 AM
0

Do you know why they have different leagues for men and women in sports?
/r/MensRights13/06/17 08:30 PM
1

A 90 lb woman would have to catch me by surprise to generate enough leverage or get close enough to my face. I can calmly and without warning pick up a 90 pound woman and slam her on the ground. there's simply no comparison of the risk. she could kick me in the balls and if you got a hold of her, I could win the fight in the time it takes for me to be incapacitated by the pain. again, not that it can't happen, but the risk is much lower. if you can't evaluate risk because of your politics, you'r…
/r/MensRights13/06/17 04:13 PM
0

In public? lol.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 03:33 PM
0

Yeah but people live their lives based on probabilities. The likelihood that a 90 lb woman will hurt me is very low. She could have course have a weapon, but what we're talking about is physical intimidation.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 01:40 PM
0

And it sort of a cognitive defect that humans have unfortunately. That being said, testosterone also makes your tendons and ligaments stronger in your bones denser, so a larger woman is often times weaker. That contributes to peoples difficulty judging that sort of situation
/r/MensRights12/06/17 11:10 PM
-1

I think it's kind of a shitty complaint post, yeah. women also can't walk around with their shirts off.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 07:46 PM
-8

I think it's because I weigh 220 lbs and could murder most women with my bare hands in a matter of seconds. women are also historically trained to be passive and so it's assumed I can tell them to fuck off if I don't like it. and if they don't stop it's unlikely they're going to hurt me.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 07:36 PM
1

well right, classical liberalism is a pretty great thing, and it can mean a lot of things. I just mean the current face of the behemoth
/r/MensRights08/06/17 03:31 PM
1

pretend those feed sacks can get brain damage if you shake them. Not discounting your main point though
/r/MensRights08/06/17 05:12 AM
2

isn't that liberalism in a nutshell though? admittedly, liberalism is kind of feminine. Not trying to piss anybody off, so please respond accordingly.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 05:10 AM
3

and women murder their children more. and. and. and. we just don't call it violence
/r/MensRights08/06/17 05:06 AM
1

that gender is female, the swelling tick who absorbs anything given to her for the sole purpose of propagating her genetic material, only to have a bad season and eat her own child. or you know, whatever.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 05:05 AM
-1

at least make an effort
/r/MensRights06/06/17 12:05 AM
-4

he's referring to a specific claim, and you refuted his statement as though he were talking about something else.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 11:11 PM
1

you know how when a contract is fulfilled, it doesn't void the contract?
/r/MensRights05/06/17 11:10 PM
3

judaic exegesis does in fact differentiate certain sections of their books as tribal law of the time.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 11:07 PM
1

that is correct. leviticus is tribal legalese. this has been well established and well known by anyone who cares to look into it for at least a thousand years.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 11:04 PM
4

also, "unclean" is a translation from a dead language of people who lived in the desert with no running water in a time when getting a cut on your foot could potentially kill you, so I'm not sure we can adequately judge the context.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 11:04 PM
-7

why do you come into a thread and pretend the conversation is about something other than what the people have stated?
/r/MensRights05/06/17 11:02 PM
12

I just thought it was funny.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 11:58 AM
11

that's because The Narrative is the only thing that's important, and they bend truth to fit
/r/MensRights31/05/17 10:45 PM
0

a restraining order requires a credible threat.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 11:24 PM
3

you can't get a restraining order without a direct credible threat, and it would usually have to be documented or you would need a witness. it's very hard to get one, no matter the circumstances.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 11:14 PM
10

no, studies show they can't do much else. someone has to carry shit and someone has to hold a sign, so they put the guy that weighs 200lbs and has greater bone and tissue density on the heavy lifting. women on the military literally can't carry the weight, so men carry it for them.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 01:28 AM
2

I think we should organize them. just have fun with it, reference this event, say it was a really inspiring idea. then hold a whites only screening of straight outta Compton.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 01:19 AM
0

I just used my thumbs and typed in a phrase plus the source https://www.bostonglobe.com/business/2017/05/24/women-ceos-earn-big-pay-but-few-them-have-top-job/FxhsonWfNkRO0xWzXvb1GI/story.html
/r/MensRights25/05/17 11:19 PM
12

It's because of the volume they sell. I expect a place that sells to men to be geared to men and vice versa. By and large they are.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 05:28 AM
3

I think it was a general professional group, not specifically therapists, but your point still stands. The main premise of the talk, if I recall correctly, is men don't get touched or cared for much, and it's a good thing to provide caring. Sounds like a lot of them were mad she's got a husband who is railing her on the regular and they do not.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 10:37 AM
10

My brothers wife is a physical therapist, and she did a presentation on caring for men in her professional women's group, and I understand the hostility was palpable.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 12:13 AM
4

Nailed it. Never relinquish the moral high ground to these people. If you haven't read SJWs Always Lie by Vox Day, it's a must read for numerous reasons.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 12:10 AM
11

Unfortunately no. Radfems are the ones who openly want to burn shit to the ground.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 01:08 PM
1

It absolutely did not start in places like Tumblr. It started in feminist movements in the 70s.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 12:56 PM
3

But Tumblr is porn. It's absurd to get upset about pornographers. Pornography is a symptom.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 12:56 PM
17

You've never encountered a real life self identified radfem?
/r/MensRights18/05/17 12:54 PM
1

I think fat used to mean something different.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 11:54 PM
1

All I'm talking about is absolving the woman of honesty. Go talk to the bartender and tell them you need help. Or let's admit a patriarchy, where men deal with the struggles of the world and women are as children, is the way to live.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 10:41 AM
7

I have zero respect for women who hang out with guys they complain about because solving the problem wouldn't be easy. At some point we need to either expect women to behave like adults or just give up on this equality thing. I've been on dates with dangerous women. I ditch them. It's not rocket science.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 02:31 AM
1

You're the one triggered by the word females.
/r/MensRights11/05/17 03:55 PM
1

I don't know the source, but it's from this meme https://m.imgur.com/r/Triggered/P6XduSJ
/r/MensRights10/05/17 12:20 AM
65

NICEEEEEEEEE
/r/MensRights09/05/17 09:19 PM
26

There should just be a big red "eye for an eye" button on the defendant's table in court the whole time.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 09:18 PM
33

some would say not far enough
/r/MensRights09/05/17 09:16 PM
2

"People" Some people, obviously. "Feminists" an ideology. can we not discuss an ideology by its traits now?
/r/MensRights08/05/17 04:16 PM
3

It's feminism in almost all positions of power. Most active forms of feminism are about entitlements and supremacy. So agreed, feminism per se is okay. It's just the effects and policies instated in the name of feminism are almost all cultural Marxism. Because the cultural Marxists stole the movement.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 04:15 PM
1

I'm actually a fascist Nazi occultist, thank you very much. And you're the one white knighting for women who aren't even here. Or you are a woman? Hard to figure out. In any case, who's a nicer guy than a woman? In any case, yes, I looked into it. And all you're doing is policing the behavior of a class of individuals your half wit version of Marxist theory has determined to be a privileged class Go develop your own opinions.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 01:51 PM
-7

He owns a few shares and is a billionaire who can cause entire markets to crash. You think he doesn't write letters to the companies he's invested in? You think if he wants to meet they refuse?
/r/MensRights07/05/17 01:07 PM
83

She is Chuck Schumer's niece. Also, she started making money complaining about misogyny and fat shaming, which locked her into mediocre fatsville or else her paycheck dries up.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 12:49 PM
1

People have different smells and different capacities for smell. I had a friend who could smell when women were on their period. There's also a difference in how males perceive female pheromones, etc based on a number of factors.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 09:26 AM
4

I get that you're a loser and words will fall on deaf ears, but last time I encountered someone complaining about the use of the word "females" I searched the sub (I think it was relationships) for usage, and more women used it than men. So go fuck off to the rock you crawled out from.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 09:24 AM
3

as long as the boyscouts doesn't become a social allegory camp, they'll be okay.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 08:28 PM
1

traditional masonic groups are like that. the other groups that allow women allow women. but that's the point. if people want a group with no women, and you want a group with women, make a group with women.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 08:25 PM
25

how about you have a club and do what you want, and if people don't like the way you're running your club, they make a fucking club?
/r/MensRights04/05/17 08:24 PM
2

hey brother
/r/MensRights01/05/17 12:28 AM
2

I don't like government involvement in the decision at all, but I think if they do get involved, stripping a property owner of rights based on something someone else says without any requirement of objective evidence seems pretty dangerous. Additionally, it looks like your timeline is wrong: The federal government started in 2013 by forcing a school district to let a child use the bathroom (locker room facility, etc) they chose. After the instance of Federal overreach, then conservatives started…
/r/MensRights30/04/17 01:10 PM
0

Technology hasn't made them irrelevant. Our birth rate is precipitously low because people are getting abortions and foregoing having children because they are told they're supposed to want a careerist lifestyle. It's utter bullshit. Unsurprisingly, this philosophy is comorbid with wanting to import a bunch of low-IQ savages from an actual rape culture that think women shouldn't drive or show their ankles in public. So it will work itself out in the end, we'll just take a huge IQ hit as a specie…
/r/MensRights30/04/17 12:38 PM
3

i posted this above, but while i agree, you should also fight for your child's right to do something. that is of course contingent upon him wanting to go. and then it would be better to not parade him out at every meeting. but not standing up for your child because the issue is political isn't good either.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 12:07 PM
1

if the kid doesn't want to go, i agree. if they want to go to the class, you say "ok son, hold daddy's beer"
/r/MensRights30/04/17 12:06 PM
0

if you can't identify them, then why do you need a bathroom law? the thing people are opposing is using trannies as a means for policy reform through social justice. i had some lib tell me that trans people don't have equal rights protections as renters, and i'm like THEN WHY ARE WE TALKING ABOUT PUBLIC RESTROOMS, THAT SOUNDS LIKE AN ACTUAL PROBLEM WE WOULD MOSTLY ALL AGREE ON.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 12:03 PM
1

I actually had that realization while drunk in a bar bathroom. Everyone should be leaving the seat up.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 02:46 PM
25

Most educated women have been indoctrinating into SJW beliefs, and SJWs treat apologies as admissions of guilt. Instead of the normal way humans relate.
/r/TheRedPill26/04/17 02:16 PM
0

I always just pretend my ass fits in the space they've left, and they adjust.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 04:59 PM
3

Well say they kept a small breeding program. They would still have to mix cement. Unless men were slaves.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 09:48 PM
4

not to mention, if all men died, women would start having real problems. some lesbian told me men are the biggest threat to women, i said yeah that's because we kill all your bears and fight your wars. and climb up onto scaffolding outside highrise buildings. and go into sewers.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 06:17 PM
2

I didn't say he's not an idiot, but then again, 911 tells you not to intervene while your wife is being raped. They have one goal. In any case, he didn't confront him, he followed him through his gated community. If Trayvon Martin weren't an active criminal, probably there to case a house for a robbery, and on his way to make a cheap hallucinogenic drug, he probably wouldn't have felt so threatened.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 03:43 PM
12

He was the point guy for neighborhood watch in a gated community. Someone saw a kid standing in the yard of a vacant house, and they called him. He followed the kid IN THE GATED COMMUNITY HE LIVES IN. What the fuck are you talking about?
/r/MensRights10/04/17 06:42 AM
14

They don't even give a shit about black people. You can have a dozen innocent men, women, and children killed by gang violence, and not a fucking peep. One gangbanger gets killed by a cop, and they flip out.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 06:39 AM
9

That has pretty much nothing to do with BLM or anything I said. Where do you get your information about police departments across America?
/r/MensRights10/04/17 06:37 AM
31

Freddie Gray resisted arrest and attacked police trying to restrain him to the point they were unable to properly secure his seatbelt causing him a fatal injury in transit. He also tested positive for heroin, and supposedly it's a lot more common for people on opioids to gravely injure themselves while resisting arrest. Trayvon Martin was on top of George Zimmerman attempting to bash his skull into the pavement for just following him when he was shot. Not to mention, George Zimmerman wasn't a co…
/r/MensRights10/04/17 04:19 AM
29

Seriously, expcept american, pretty much everybody on earth agree that the cops in the US really act like they can use black folks as target practice. not to point out the obvious, but maybe the people who actually observe the situation first-hand are better equipped to judge. that's not to say there isn't a problem with police prejudice against blacks, but shooting them unfairly isn't really happening. almost every example case BLM chose turned out to be bullshit, and the claim hinges on the pr…
/r/MensRights10/04/17 03:58 AM
2

The big thing will be I think maybe if there are organised counter protests on the people so the administration shit themselves at the though of having to deal with an even larger group of angry people. if you're trying to influence organizations by organizing protest, read rules for radicals. i don't agree with alinsky's politics, but he certainly was good at what he did.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 04:27 PM
2

For what it's worth I completely agree with you, and I worded my original comment poorly.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 05:18 PM
4

My point is one has a logical connection and the other doesn't. You can use logic to defend it, eg, it's defensible.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 11:46 AM
118

The fact that they mention gender is at least defensible. The fact that they mention race is so fucking irrelevant that it hurts.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 05:09 AM
1

I didn't click on the article until just now, because BuzzFeed. But I did see calls for social justice in this thread, and I occasionally see them in MR.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 04:25 PM
1

BuzzFeed aren't SJWs?
/r/MensRights22/03/17 02:23 PM
4

now might be a good time to read sjws always lie it's kind of embarrassing to find sjws infiltrating men's rights, but it comes with the territory, i guess.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 11:05 PM
10

it's misleading comments all the way down!
/r/MensRights20/03/17 12:31 PM
1

It seems like you define male reasons as a reason used by a man in power. The Japanese war wasn't started to knife fuck people. My point is security and prosperity and wealth are as much female as male reasons.
/r/MensRights28/02/17 08:06 PM
1

You said for male concerns. No matter that women rulers have historically been more warlike. That's probably men's fault too.
/r/MensRights28/02/17 07:07 PM
1

It's not a war if you don't fight back
/r/MensRights28/02/17 02:49 PM
4

wars are started by men, for exclusively male reasons and purposes so like if japan wanted to come into your country and knife fuck your women and children, fighting back would be a male reason?
/r/MensRights25/01/17 01:30 PM
1

well, the post seems like a funny post someone was trying to make about these people and then someone had to say something stupid.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 01:29 PM
2

this is a weird leftist narrative. same wording appeared in Vice.
/r/MensRights11/11/16 06:41 AM
1

it's some weird narrative being pushed by leftist media. this came up in Vice, too.
/r/MensRights11/11/16 06:39 AM
-1

then you're not disagreeing with enough women.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 07:00 PM
0

Feel free and call people you disagree with politically scum. All it does is make you weaker. Like a cuck.
/r/MensRights22/09/16 07:22 AM
-1

Oh man what a total fucking cuck that guy is. Jesus
/r/MensRights21/09/16 11:55 PM
5

it's a joke
/r/MensRights20/09/16 04:55 PM
-5

Also, there's are males who don't get beaten up. I've been slapped a few times in the past, but I've to put it crudely alphad the fuck up by now. My point being, the fact that some people haven't been hit means that women are hitting men who are vulnerable. Like predators would.
/r/MensRights15/09/16 11:53 AM
3

it wasn't even the kkk. it was these guys. and the antifa didn't show up to counterprotest, they showed up to beat the shit out of them.
/r/MensRights11/09/16 11:25 AM
3

women too, actually
/r/MensRights11/09/16 11:24 AM
1

i'm 5'11", and i have average slight pudge at 200lbs. i'm built like a brick shithouse, and starving myself for a six-pack at 20, i weighed 170.
/r/MensRights11/09/16 11:23 AM
1

hey, lay off toddlers.
/r/MensRights11/09/16 11:20 AM
2

the stupid thing is i have checked on women multiple times in my life when i was in a place to do so. i do this not because of the stupid guilt tripping bullshit feminists pull, but because i'm a human and i care about other humans.
/r/MensRights08/09/16 11:22 PM
2

I agree, I just mean college is specifically where kids go away to and receive the actual letter of the doctrine.
/r/MensRights08/09/16 07:10 PM
15

they have 4 years of college to convert everyone else's kids though.
/r/MensRights08/09/16 03:15 AM
30

FTM and MTF can clearly be raped because they're not privileged, shitlord. /s
/r/MensRights08/09/16 03:13 AM
1

That's $10 per item
/r/MensRights04/09/16 07:19 PM
0

the person who wrote it could be pro-life for all we know.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 01:56 PM
0

Except I'm not using high brow vocabulary, i'm using rich vocabulary. I write, sorry if explaining my choice of words makes you feel inadequate.
/r/MensRights23/08/16 10:57 PM
2

A word in the national lexicon is a real word. There is no body I'm English the prescribes words as legitimate or illegitimate like in French or in some cases Greek. It's based on usage. Welcome.
/r/MensRights23/08/16 10:55 PM
-4

I use a rich vocabulary so that I don't have to rely on adjectives, son.
/r/MensRights23/08/16 07:46 PM
-14

The social status of teachers has reduced too, partly because they don't earn the big money I guess. that, and you have to be a total cuck to teach. kids can spit in your face, and you can't do anything. fuck that noise.
/r/MensRights23/08/16 04:08 PM
15

My sister can openly say she loves small children/babies, but if a man ever uttered that sentence everyone would label him as a "weirdo". while that's somewhat true, i think the only solution henceforth is to say that, and then when people give you shit for it, call them a sick perverted bigot and tell them to fuck off.
/r/MensRights23/08/16 04:07 PM
18

The ridiculous thing is that we have stats from places where 1 in 4 women actually are raped, like DRC. Ask the next person who tries to tell you the 1 in 4 number (this is on college campuses, btw) think that as many middle class white 20 year olds have been raped as women of all ages in regressive extremist controlled Congo.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 03:46 PM
16

Camping builds character
/r/MensRights12/08/16 03:43 PM
74

YOU ARE CONVENIENTLY FORGETTING THAT ALL MEN ARE RAPISTS, SHITLORD
/r/MensRights08/08/16 09:41 PM
1

Oh. Yeah, man. Anyway, its a rough and tumble place over there and can be infuriating, but calling the users stupid for the mods being trigger happy is weird when reddit literally changed their algorithm multiple times to keep posts from the sub off /r/all It's a magical land.
/r/MensRights07/08/16 02:36 AM
2

i've gotten banned and unbanned probably a half dozen times. i explain i'm not a cuck, then i get unbanned. but my butt doesn't hurt. does your butt hurt?
/r/MensRights07/08/16 02:02 AM
1

read the sidebar. its original intention is as a shitposting sub in support of the god emperor. no concern trolling, no advocating for anyone else, etc. the rules have somewhat relaxed, honestly, but the rules are still in effect. and when you say "posted" do you mean posted? or are you talking about comments? because posts have to meet certain criteria. most middle of the road things in /r/politics get banned, homie, and they're lying about the rules.
/r/MensRights07/08/16 01:18 AM
1

Sounds like your butt hurts. Just because you don't understand a dialog doesn't mean it doesn't have merit. The place is largely founded on a light 4chan model of shitposting first, discussion later. Still, plenty of intelligent sourced information comes through, and most dubious posts get roundly refuted by the community. I'm not sure you can read.
/r/MensRights07/08/16 12:37 AM
3

reddit is run by SJW cucks. sorry to say. /r/The_Donald, whatever your opinion on the election, is a glorious demonstration of reddit censorship, and they out constant censorship on /r/politics and the like.
/r/MensRights06/08/16 10:30 PM
1

they find that in societies with lower stress, there is more gender differentiation. which is exactly what you're saying here.
/r/MensRights31/07/16 09:16 PM
-3

Men and women have complementary DNA. The analogy still works with bees, because we're talking a necessary part of life, vs something not necessary. Or in other words, benefit outweighs the drawback. It also works because we consider personality traits that are influenced by bacteria with unique DNA inside us as us. And anyway, this is a stupid conversation because I said if you view them as. And you said they're not. It's a goddamn illustrative point.
/r/MensRights31/07/16 06:23 PM
-9

If you view men and women as one organism (which they are; remove one part, the organism dies), you see they each perform a symbiotic biological function. women moderate, slow down, and collect energy. they are the incubators for children, and they stop children (and their men) from behaving rashly. they seek the collective, and they seek agreement for things. men knock things down, build things up, get in fights. they push to have sex with women, they push to do new things. they go out and kill…
/r/MensRights31/07/16 04:43 PM
44

the fact that they changed this kid's life because he signed "i am a girl" at them at age 3 is deranged. i said all sorts of stupid shit when i was a child. i probably said at least a couple things i didn't mean.
/r/MensRights24/07/16 05:50 PM
1

I posted this 144 days ago, Jesus Christ. I've come around a bit since then. I haven't exactly stopped believing what I wrote, but the impossibility of verifying who is who is seriously problematic.
/r/TheRedPill23/07/16 02:22 PM
1

The most retarded thing is the author can't figure out that the same reason women are safer drivers accounts for why they are less likely to race cars.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 11:10 PM
5

what horror will she be living with? that if she drinks herself to the brink of death again, she might be putting herself in danger? she has no recollection of the event, and he stuck some fingers in her. i have had worse things done to me while conscious and i'm completely fine.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 02:40 AM
2

he was super drunk and he stuck his fingers in her pussy. she drank herself to the brink of death. he was convicted of the crime he committed and will serve time.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 02:35 AM
4

That is Milo, yeah.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 12:51 AM
79

Milo Yiannopoulos (I think it was him) said he had a friend who invested in the stock market in part by betting against companies when they announced they were heavily pushing diversity, because it marked the point of departure from meritocracy and basic sense.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 06:04 PM
1

i know lots of people disagree with me, but thank god for Donald Trump. i hope he wins. and as disastrous as i believe Sanders would be, i would rather see him win than Clinton too.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 12:24 AM
2

you're not wrong, but i have a hard time believing a man in that position would be able to avoid extradition by feeling faint.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 03:17 PM
1

the only thing that calms her condition is child semen, don't be insensitive.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 03:16 PM
1

haha, i just mean it's to be expected that someone who focuses all their time on power gets off on power play. like how i focus all my time on girls' booties.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/16 06:49 PM
1

You've started working, just keep working. Keep reading to get new perspectives and keep building one brick at a time. You'll find you have problems that you identify strongly with, and those are the biggest roadblock a lot of the time because they're so hard to let go.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/16 04:44 PM
1

It's usually high power business guys who like being dominated too, because they have a power fetish.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/16 04:42 PM
1

Contrast this with Buddhist texts i think to be fair, you have to contrast it with Judaism. they're supposed to kill all the Amalekites, man, woman, child, and livestock. The bigger picture is that Islam sees itself as a political entity that can come under attack and can be defended by Muslims. well, so does Zionism and the ADL, and to a lesser degree Judaism in general. if you question israel, you're a racist, etc. the problem is largely the culture of the part of the world, because both Jews …
/r/TheRedPill03/03/16 03:03 PM
1

first off, thanks for being civil and providing me with stuff to chew on. i may have been influenced in my interpretation from what he says in his paper: We have been taught that the Koran is the source of Islamic doctrine. However, the Koran is only 14% of the total sacred texts. Actually, the Sira and the Hadith are 86% of the total textual doctrine. Islam is 14% Allah and 86% Mohammed. This is very good news. The Koran is obscure, but anyone can understand the life and sayings of Mohammed. Th…
/r/TheRedPill02/03/16 05:39 AM
0

let me be clear that i think there is a serious problem with islam worldwide, and letting large groups of muslim refugees into a country has generally been proven to be a bad idea. i don't think all of his points are entirely invalid. i don't find him to be very convincing, because he doesn't appear to have engaged in genuine study and i see evidence of what i consider to be sloppy thought. he sounds very much like an /(r)/atheism subscriber talking about the bible at times. however, he's made t…
/r/TheRedPill02/03/16 04:53 AM
1

can you back that up? for science, please. and are you talking the quran or the hadith? because arguably, the quran has to be put on the level with the torah, since both are ostensibly revelation through a medium, not the message of the medium itself. for every criticism of the text of the quran, you have to allow the same criticism to be leveled with the same weight against the torah. for what it's worth, atheists believe that there is no unifying significance to the universe and nothing matter…
/r/TheRedPill01/03/16 11:50 PM
1

I mean, I actually know several Sufis and actually know a lot about religion (I'm seriously a fucking weirdo by normal standards) The Muslim belief you mention is akin to Christians who believe it's okay to fuck people over because they don't believe in Jesus. Or blow up abortion clinics. The proportions are better for the Christians these days, but come the fuck on. And goddammit, I talk to my fucking ethnic taxi drivers because I'd rather really to people than play on my phone.
/r/TheRedPill01/03/16 02:01 AM
-1

there's no way every uber driver i've ridden with has been a sufi.
/r/TheRedPill29/02/16 09:03 PM
1

My question is, Is there any tests i can run/try on her to see if shes faithful and what are the signs of an unfaithful girlfriend and also how can I fix my LTR she already failed the tests, son. the only thing that doesn't look bad is smoking weed 3 times. EDIT: and i disagree with the advice to demote. you have developed terrible habits that you will have a hard time overcoming. i would dump her completely and stop talking to her. she makes bad decisions and might give you herpes. raise your f…
/r/TheRedPill29/02/16 05:28 PM
3

would it have been ok to piss on the nazi ? no. it's against the code of conduct. if you don't like the code of conduct, don't join.
/r/TheRedPill29/02/16 05:27 PM
1

i think someone trained in tactical combat would be a bit of a problem, even if she were smaller than you.
/r/TheRedPill29/02/16 05:26 PM
1

I do. Islam is a cancer on humanity. lol. there are certainly two strains of it, just like there are two strains to christianity.
/r/TheRedPill29/02/16 05:15 PM
1

I don't go to the gym whoosh I said 155 you did have the number 155 in your comment, that much is true. Are you trying to convince me or yourself of that? whoosh
/r/TheRedPill29/02/16 04:30 PM
1

There's no reason to use language that is actually harder to parse except for if you're failing to understand something because it's equivocal, the next step would be to use unequivocal language. if it's significantly harder to parse for you, spend less time in the gym (blasphemy!) and more time reading. That's what a triple digit number means to you, only 100? no, i asked for a definition, and you said triple digit. a definition restricts the meaning of something until it has use. i asked for a…
/r/TheRedPill29/02/16 03:54 PM
1

You type like a fedorian neckbeard, i don't have time to follow trough your wishy washy fluff. Stop writing like that. Are you new here? do you mean using unequivocal (can't be understood two ways) language to speak to you? or do you mean my use of statistical terminology (words for statistics)? i will not apologize for having a command of the language and using it. High IQ = triple digits so 100? that's literally exactly average. The original statement was. no. you don't understand english, and…
/r/TheRedPill29/02/16 02:05 PM
-5

Which is why the initial statement was wrong, we're more likely to be smarter but also dumber one doesn't preclude the other. the original statement isn't wrong or even mildly inaccurate. The definition of high IQ is only one. Someone with high IQ. how many standard deviations is that? because if your cutoff is one standard deviation, the number of high IQ men and women is nearly identical. move your cutoff to 2std, it becomes weighted towards men. it depends on what your definition of "high" IQ…
/r/TheRedPill29/02/16 01:38 PM
1

(previously shared on TRP; example from Samantha Brick - https://archive.is/ycwei) i do have to say i've done IT for some offices comprised of 90% women and 10% gay males in manhattan, and they ran like clockwork. i think Samantha Brick sounds like a terrible leader who picked awful people, though i do think having a man they answer to would help.
/r/TheRedPill29/02/16 12:48 PM
3

while yours might be harder to misconstrue, they're both true statements depending on your definition of high IQ. the bell curve for men is a touch wider and flatter.
/r/TheRedPill29/02/16 12:44 PM
2

i think it makes more sense to say you need to find a major you can find pleasure in. and then find pleasure in it. if you actively dislike something, you will not do well, you will not make money in the long run, nobody will like you.
/r/TheRedPill29/02/16 12:33 PM
1

normally i would be terribly concerned, but i think you'll be fine as long as you do the necessary legwork: first, write down what happened in as much detail and as eloquently and clearly as possible. do this immediately. your story needs to not change. have your friend do it as well. this should include any communication with her the day before as well as up to when you deleted your texts. if you can remember any or all texts as close to verbatim as possible, write them down. note that you are …
/r/TheRedPill26/02/16 01:18 PM
2

you mean the 14 year old? or the two 15 year olds? probably definitely the two 17 year olds.
/r/TheRedPill26/02/16 12:51 PM
21

yeah, but they're technically children. she should be charged with raping the 14 year old and the two 15 year olds.
/r/TheRedPill26/02/16 12:49 PM
7

yeah, i can't find the original study, but it's mentioned in the thesis. here's the text from the reddit post: Two studies demonstrated that lay people misperceive the relationship between hostile sexism (HS) and benevolent sexism (BS) in men, but not in women. While men's endorsement of BS is viewed as a sign of a univalently positive attitude towards women, their rejection of BS is perceived as a sign of univalent sexist antipathy. Low BS men were judged as more hostile towards women than high…
/r/TheRedPill25/02/16 08:47 PM
1

the right at least doesn't use you as a pawn while pretending to be your friend. they tend to take a patriarchal role, claiming they know what is best, which can somehow be addressed. the left uses the victim classes it bandies about to control others and perpetuate their power structure, all while pretending they're trying to reform the deficient (the privileged). if you disagree, you're evil. the only definition of evil is relative to the party line. i had a minister i'm friends with on facebo…
/r/TheRedPill25/02/16 08:10 PM
0

(newsflash: all men do this, and will do this, forever) and all women, perhaps even more harshly.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/16 07:52 PM
5

interjecting, but if a woman calls you a misogynist, just laugh. or say, sure. or correct them one single time ("i don't hate anyone, it's bad for my liver"). you can't win the argument, because your opinion is invalid as a white cis male (or whatever epithet they latch onto) a shit test is a big wave. you're a boat, so you float on top of the wave, just don't look ridiculous while you're floating on top of the water.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/16 05:09 PM
15

didn't realize i couldn't link to np reddit. here's a direct link to the study. /u/PrimaxAUS, i did it right this time.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/16 03:54 PM
1

it's been my whole life, and i'm over 30.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/16 03:48 PM
0

None of what you said implies he's not smart. I realize this is probably difficult for you.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/16 10:57 PM
1

Read my comment again, Charles in charge, I didnt ask for one.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/16 10:37 PM
8

You think trumps intelligence is "very low"? Lol
/r/TheRedPill23/02/16 11:40 AM
1

eventually There it is again. And your claims are even more specific and strongly stated than mine, I'm not interested in playing along with your citation dance. It's obvious you're not providing me citations for your claims, especially given a definition of intelligence as a multifactor complex that isn't really quantifiable by science.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/16 11:28 AM
2

Extremely intelligent people actually tend to have social deficiencies, if you're going by the only quantified measure of intelligence. Being more intelligent and circumspect than other children gets you ostracized. Tell me how being ostracized until you're 20 gives you a leg up on crushing pussy. You can't just define intelligence as "RP as FUCK" and then go from there.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/16 11:42 PM
2

Eventually. that is exactly my point. if they're willing to take risks and be outgoing they'll be fine by mid-twenties and will be doing much better overall than the mediocre guy. provided a lot of things fall into place for them. plenty of guys in here who didn't have the realization (because things were good enough) until their 40s. not saying you're wrong, but you're presenting a best case scenario, much of which is outside of your control until the truth is thrust upon you.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/16 09:59 PM
7

Stop letting "real men" fuck women in your bed. It's bad juju
/r/TheRedPill22/02/16 01:40 PM
2

i know when i'm talking to someone who's aware of the terror of the situation, but thanks for your concern.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/16 03:42 AM
1

Desperation and expectation disparity plays a large part doe too doe
/r/TheRedPill22/02/16 12:52 AM
6

Lol. Having baseline intelligence, good physical condition, and no self awareness will get you pussy 9/10 if you're competing with intelligence. Maybe not at 30+, but an intelligent person has to first gut out all the lies and then apply themselves to dominate any field.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/16 12:51 AM
3

You're wrong when you say nobody is at black men's throats. Where do you live? I see it in Brooklyn, I saw it in Florida. My friend who did forensic photography in the south quit because cops kept showing him their collection of K9 mauled niggers. There are ignorant white guys and ignorant black guys. I experience ignorant black guys more often, but everyone I know who was faceplanted into the asphalt by police is black. It's a little incongruous with your claims. And on the blacks are more like…
/r/TheRedPill22/02/16 12:42 AM
16

I know it's slim pickings, but the trick would be to figure out how to find a woman who's not like that. I'm dating a Greek who is pretty incredible, works hard, pays half, wants to suck my dick all the time, and can understand reason. Her not being American is a huge help. But through talking to her, I realized my criteria henceforth to even consider a woman my friend is the ability to ride the following logic train all the way into the station: Any system will be exploited by some people. Men …
/r/TheRedPill21/02/16 11:19 PM
1

yeah, i think specific advice here should always be taken as an example of something that works rather than the correct answer on a quiz. like you can have an elevation map, a country map, a population density map, etc. all are accurate maps, but for different purposes. definitely try specific examples if you think they fit with a situation, but don't them as the be all end all, even if it works well for you.
/r/TheRedPill21/02/16 05:58 PM
2

i mean, if a girl says you're an asshole, "ok" is a perfectly suitable response. or you squint your eyes a little and then look at your phone and tell her about a funny text you got. passing a shit test is almost exclusively in the domain of you not being shaken. if someone's giving you shit and it doesn't bother you, you passed. you can say almost anything (or nothing) as long as you stay calm, comfortable, and confident. in my personal experience, you can provide a woman some comfort while she…
/r/TheRedPill21/02/16 05:10 PM
2

The thing that biologically reinforces the think of the glory mindset is the selection of the female.
/r/TheRedPill29/10/15 06:23 PM
2

Idiot progressives posting sjw style shit on a college campus might, since it's politically correct.
/r/TheRedPill29/10/15 02:02 PM
11

so you two should get along, then.
/r/TheRedPill28/10/15 06:00 PM
2

showing little experience maybe thinking you're better than the type of work you'll be doing the suit has symbolic associations with power. if the interviewer isn't wearing a suit, you might be too stupid to understand social hierarchy, which might upset clients.
/r/TheRedPill08/11/14 06:41 PM
10

i just moved to nyc, and it's definitely kind of over the top at times. that being said, it's mostly black and hispanic people from low economic backgrounds. but you can't say anything about black culture.
/r/TheRedPill08/11/14 04:28 PM
6

a large portion of the IT field is essentially service industry. the people whose desks you're climbing under might not even be wearing suits. you should dress nice, but dressing like an investment banker could easily be construed as a red flag. Way to cause confusion and deny a potential contributor based on appearances which effectively mean nothing. which is why i go to interviews naked.
/r/TheRedPill08/11/14 04:19 PM
1

that's conflating dressing well with dressing up. dressed well for a technician tops out around slacks and a well-fitting collared shirt, maybe a tie. if they tell you it's a casual dress environment and you show up with a tie, you're an idiot.
/r/TheRedPill08/11/14 04:15 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter