TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheresWald0 Archive

View 0 posts and 75 comments by TheresWald0 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

Thanks for coming out.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/06/20 12:52 PM
1

60 bottles of wine a mo the would be a lot. He's probably spending more than that. Or he's one serious drunk.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/20 05:14 PM
3

Dude. Lawyer up. You've got a confession. Screen shots aren't needed, you've got phone records. The "it wasn't me" shit won't pass muster in a court room. That's about as air tight as it gets.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/11/19 02:34 PM
3

What the fuck. "please stop kicking me"? When on earth has a resisting man been given one tenth of the leaway that woman was given.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/11/19 01:40 PM
2

Was there a crime attempted by the woman in the post? Why would a Judge give the man all the money? Certainly not because she was attempting fraud?
/r/PussyPassDenied20/07/19 08:02 PM
3

It doesn't. I'm sure there is a middle ground, like /r/somestuffhappens
/r/PussyPassDenied20/07/19 07:38 PM
1

I get what you are saying that it isn't black and white, and an arbitrary age such as 18 is imperfect, but you lost me at the 14 year old with the 40 year old and "proper consent". The whole concept of statutory rape revolves around the idea that "proper consent" can't be given by a 14 year old to a 40 year old. I agree with that idea. How about a 12 year old? At some point it becomes objectively, completely unacceptable, and whatever age that is, is going to be arbitrary. So the decided age is …
/r/PussyPassDenied19/03/19 08:58 PM
12

You have to convict to sentence someone
/r/PussyPassDenied19/03/19 05:15 PM
11

A fine for raping a 14 year old? Are you confused what sub you posted this to.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/03/19 05:11 PM
4

Wrong turn.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/03/19 04:19 PM
38

Took a bit of left turn there eh.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/03/19 03:55 PM
2

I don't have any moral high ground, I just don't think you are funny. The people you've referenced are, and this "like me and..." shit is hilarious (you think too highly of yourself).
/r/PussyPassDenied22/04/18 06:04 PM
4

But they're funny
/r/PussyPassDenied22/04/18 04:02 PM
1

I had to go back and watch the video again, and you're right. Stoping to cuff her there could have been really dangerous. They should have been fine to transport her like that but the fourth officer had to deal with what I assume is the boyfriend she was holding onto. He would have had the arm that was free. Nobody else could restrain the free arm since they were carrying her. She played a stupid game and won a stupid prize.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/11/17 05:54 PM
1

That's what stood out to me. Wtf. Reverse the genders and read that part again and it's obvious how fucked writing that is. It's pretty disgusting they would print that.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/11/17 05:26 PM
1

Exactly, they turned their backs to all those people and focused their energy on the struggling, unrestrained suspect. Three officers controlling the crowd while one cuffed her would have been safer imo. Safer from the threats that you mentioned. Again it's easy to arm chair quarterback the situation after the fact, but I still think it would have been better.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/11/17 05:22 PM
1

Yeah I can see where that could have been necessary, possibly. There isn't enough info from where the video starts. I would definitely think that with four officers, three controlling the crowd while one cuffs the already combative suspect would have been a better move. It's a question I'd want my officers to answer and review what went down and how it could have been done differently for a better outcome, but if the officers said they didn't think that would be safe because of the nature of the…
/r/PussyPassDenied14/11/17 04:53 PM
1

If this were a guy he'd have been cuffed before being transported. That's the only thing I don't like about this video. Taking a swing at a cop will get you hit, but if I was the officers superior I'd be pissed at him that she was free to swing in the first place. There were a number of officers there. She should have been properly restrained before being transported. She was out of control and obviously they didn't have effective co trial over her, or she couldn't have been swinging. Once that …
/r/PussyPassDenied14/11/17 04:33 PM
1

You will be charged the same. The difference comes at sentencing.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/11/17 04:25 PM
7

Pretty clear you didn't see his point since he was addressing the exact thing you commented about. His answer was "because the patriarchy" and then explained why that's not a legitimate reason why women don't make the stories that other women want.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 12:45 PM
2

The best you can hope for is sexual assault? What?
/r/PussyPassDenied10/06/17 06:55 PM
15

The guy he was responding to was talking about hitting her.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/04/17 12:57 PM
8

Xenophobia and racism are different like identical twins are different. Sure they're distinct from each other, but damn do they look the same.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/04/17 12:42 PM
2

Read the news?
/r/PussyPassDenied01/04/17 12:26 PM
84

The article said she bought a half share in the house, so of course she should get half the value. It's a more substantial win considering that.
/r/MensRights14/02/17 12:15 AM
1

Yeah I guess your right. Why would anyone ever need professional help after being molested at 8 years old. Nobody ever needs professional help because we all heal ourselves. Hilarious. Yeah I'm the one with the "one easy trick". It's clear I'm making this issue much simpler than it actually is. Edit: are fucking serious? I suggest professional therapy to deal with childhood trauma. Therapy that will likely take years. Yeah what a simple "one easy trick" much simpler than " just heal yourself".
/r/MensRights18/01/17 09:53 PM
1

Yeah weird. You seem so well adjusted. Being molested at the age of 8 wouldn't ever require any therapy or anything. Who knows where I got that idea. And it's not like the suggestion struck a nerve or anything. Yeah. Carry on. You're fine.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 09:46 PM
10

Ignorance of the law isn't the issue. I'm sure the guy being deceived knew having sex with someone under 18 is illegal. That's why the ID is an important part.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 09:32 PM
1

I've made fairly clear how seriously I take sex crimes against children. I hope whoever hurt you rots in a prison cell, and if (heaven forbid) you repeat the cycle, I hope you do too. I really hope your therapist is helping you work through your victimization because I'm genuinely concerned about some of the idea you've espoused regarding minors consenting to sex with adults. All joking and insults aside I really hope you are seeing a professional to help you work through this stuff.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 09:29 PM
1

Nah they're just for shits and giggles. Diddler.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 09:17 PM
1

By default, having to explain why an adult having sex with a minor is always wrong is never going to be a normal conversation.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 09:12 PM
2

You can assume whatever you want.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 09:02 PM
8

Making the laws better Gould e easy enough in this instance. Something like "if the minor uses guile and deception to present themselves convincingly as at or above age of majority, the accused could not have known their actions were a crime and therefore can't be held accountable". Obviously I'm no lawyer, but something to that effect. I agree with you though. Only way to keep yourself safe is to steer clear of any possible grey area.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 09:00 PM
2

I agree. Those guys are fucking skeevy, but it would seem safe to assume that in an 18 and over club that requires ID, everyone is over 18. There a bi difference (as in jail time) between skeevy, and statutory rapist.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 08:56 PM
1

Are you familiar with NAMBLA? I'm gonna guess you are but in case not you should check them out. You share a lot of the same ideas about adult-child relationships.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 08:51 PM
1

An adult having sex with a child is morally indefensible. Unless you are someone who REALLY wants to have sex with a child, then I imagine you would try all kinds of mental gymnastics to somehow make it seem morally defensible.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 08:42 PM
1

Facts that AREN'T in dispute: teacher had sex with 13 year old student. THATS A CRIME DIPSHIT. the rest is just unnecessary details that child rape apologist clings to as some kind of justification for their own desire for child sex.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 08:38 PM
10

That's not really the issue. What about a 40 year old havin sex with an 18 year old. Gross maybe but nothing illegal. Now what if the 18 year old used a fake ID and they were actually 16?
/r/MensRights18/01/17 08:29 PM
1

I don't know all the details, but I know enough to determine a crime took place. See, when you aren't trying to justify sex with minors the perpetrators middle name is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 08:22 PM
1

Only when they defend child fuckers, you piece of human garbage.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 08:21 PM
0

Yes. That's why she got ten years. Glad to see you are coming around.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 08:19 PM
1

You've been chased with pitch forks often before, haven't you?
/r/MensRights18/01/17 08:18 PM
0

If two five year olds have sex nobody is getting charged. The charges come when the other party is older and capable of understanding that taking advantage of a child's sexual curiosity for their own gratification if fucking sick.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 08:15 PM
8

If a parent pimps their child out, they are culpable for the child's rape. After they were aware of the situation and did nothing they became culpable in the rape of their child. Whatever. Parent are huge shitbags and every adult that should have been protecting this kid allowed his exploitation.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 08:02 PM
6

There is no need or a complaining witness. The DA decides to press charges, not the victim. (Thank goodness)
/r/MensRights18/01/17 07:56 PM
5

And the parents are guilty of criminal neglect since they knew their child (who they are legally bound to protect) was being raped, and they did nothing. The parents might not be rapists but they also aren't innocent.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 07:53 PM
13

The parents were fully aware that their kid was having a sexual relationship with the teacher. The kid would spend the night at her house. Once the parents were aware of their relationship and did nothing I think child neglect is a reasonable charge for turning a blind eye to the rape of your child. They were supposed to protect and take care of their kid. From the moment they knew what was up and chose to do nothing they were accomplices in the crime.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 07:51 PM
1

That's a horrible guess and could only be true if the parents were legitimately mentally disabled.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 07:45 PM
2

If that vagina belonged to an adult then you shouldn't have been given that choice (since you were 5 fucking years old) and the adult that gave you that choice broke the law.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 07:34 PM
7

Because as a society we have decided that 13 year olds are so fucking stupid that we won't allow them to make that decision for themselves. We have also decided that adults (the teacher) need to understand in no uncertain terms that fucking 13 year olds is wrong and won't be tolerated, regardless of how the 13 year old felt about the experience. If you don't like that or don't agree, then just take note that people like you are the reason such strict laws exist. Seriously what the fuck point are…
/r/MensRights18/01/17 07:30 PM
71

I agree, but statutory rape being a strict liability crime is bullshit. The minor can use whatever deception they want such as fake ID's to "prove" they are an adult, but it makes no difference. I think that's bullshit. If you were convincingly deceived into an action that you legitimately believed to be lawful I don't think you should be charged with a crime.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 07:23 PM
1

I wasn't seriously insulting him. It's a line from the movie Elf when Will Farrel's character met a children author who was a little person that had a very authoritative demeanor. I was trying (maybe unsuccessfully) to be funny.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 02:43 PM
1

Haha. I don't care for large chain restaurants in general. I like a lot of variety and new experiences with food so I kinda think it sucks that I know they will all be the same. I generally try to hit up more independent restaurants. Sometimes the food isn't as good as Applebee's might have been and sometimes it's way better. Not knowing is part of the fun for me.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 04:52 AM
1

I agree with the study, sort of. A differential study isn't the right way to test for a personality disorder like an inferiority complex. It's an excellent way to test wether generally, short men feel inferior compared to normal or tall people, and develop maladaptive behavior as a result. I have no doubt about the study's findings in this regard, but having an inferiority complex isn't related to being short any more than schizophrenia is related to being short. However when a short person does…
/r/MensRights16/01/17 04:39 AM
1

On the whole I agree that someone being aggressive has to do with personality and not physical stature, but the Napoleon complex is definitely real. Inferiority complexes take all kinds of forms and some short guys have it.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 03:17 AM
1

I definitely suck it up when booking the seat was an option. That's on me for not doing it if it an option, but on some flights you can't.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 03:14 AM
2

My legs would get smashed. I'm not exaggerating. There just isn't room. If you are willing to hurt someone so that you can recline your seat then you are definitely the entitled prick. Wouldn't matter. Flight attendant would either move one of us or tell you not to recline. That's not a guess, I've had it happen when I complained about not being able to use my seat. It's not like I can stand for the flight.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 03:10 AM
9

I wouldn't kick your chair non stop. Wouldn't even do it once. I would politely talk to you about the problem and if that wasn't enough I would also contact the flight attendant who would ask you not to recline.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 03:05 AM
-1

I thought you were probably joking but it did give me a visual of someone with small man syndrome. Tone is tough in text but I was also joking around.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 12:48 AM
4

In reality I wouldn't have to shove your seat back because you couldn't recline in the first place without breaking my legs. This is a common issue when I fly and every single time the flight attendant will either move me or the person in front. If that's impossible then the person is told they can't recline. I don't want to cause anyone any pain or discomfort, but I'm not sure you are getting that you would have to break the laws of physics to recline your seat if you are in front of me. Douche…
/r/MensRights16/01/17 12:45 AM
1

Yeah I feel ya. Everybody deserves some perks while flying. I can handle the regular seat (uncomfortably) as long as the person in front doesn't recline on me. I feel bad that they can't recline but it's just not physically possible.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 12:05 AM
0

I've met lots of little guys with that syndrome.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 11:55 PM
4

WTF. How about when I get a discount I won't shove your seat back off my knees. You are actually willing to cause real pain so you can lean back? You're shitty at being a human being.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 11:54 PM
8

It sucks but I'm tall. We both paid lots for our tickets but I'm tall enough that it isn't an option. Literally not physically possible to recline your seat without doing physical damage to me. Sorry but not being injured trumps your reclining. I get your beef though. Complain to the airline. I honestly hope you can get some compensation.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 10:32 PM
5

You are literally talking about crushing the knees of the person behind you because you have a right to be comfortable. Do you get why that's really stupid?
/r/MensRights15/01/17 10:28 PM
0

All the more reason why a 5'6" guy sitting there sucks.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 10:23 PM
2

It's great when it's an option but it isn't always.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 10:22 PM
7

You're an angry little guy aren't you
/r/MensRights15/01/17 10:20 PM
1

No, she was womanasking
/r/MensRights15/01/17 10:10 PM
29

Dealing with it directly before going to HR is a mistake. Either let it go completely or go straight to HR.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 10:02 PM
1

...no
/r/MensRights01/01/17 03:20 PM
6

It takes a big set of lady balls to make an issue out of a wage gap when there is a DEATH gap. Men are like 10 times more likely to die on the job. Maybe the two are related? If they aren't, they should be.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/16 09:08 PM
2

It's not even fucking true. I know women who go to the bar with zero fucking money. They bud light is free!! (Paid for by a man)
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/16 09:07 PM
1

I understand what you are saying and I agree, but as far as trying to understand an individuals position, I don't see how you can avoid "sword fighting a fart"? If someone were to identify themselves to me as a Conservative, a liberal, a Christian, a feminist, or whatever other broad group they identify with, I would only be able to make conclusions as broad and sweeping as their "common peg". I know some older women who identify as feminists because of their position and actions during the sixt…
/r/MensRights01/08/15 06:14 PM
1

Pointing out one commonality that exists (believing in Jesus) and concluding that the other differences that exist between sects of Christianity are irrelevant, is infantile. It simply isn't true. If it were, then how can there be polar opposite views on issues within different sects of Christianity (similar to neo feminists and classical feminists (yes there are different feminists)). Oversimplifying a complicated issue may feel nice but it just isn't realistic.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 01:22 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter