TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheresanotherJoswell Archive

View 0 posts and 119 comments by TheresanotherJoswell on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-54

Haha you guys. Ive heard MRAs talk about how schools need to be changed because girls are outperforming boys. This isnt just for female students. All students will be able to take the paper home, and hopefully we'll see all students performing better. If half the women on the course are underperforming, then surely it makes much more sense to adapt the assesment and get a better idea of how much the students have learned?
/r/MensRights11/06/17 03:06 PM
2

Tropes aren't bad, they're just lazy.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 08:15 PM
-2

Hmmm. Well what else are they going to do, realistically? Yes, it's going to suck having a sailor out of action for 12 weeks plus light duties; but what are the chances of them being back to full ability any quicker? And I know it sucks, but national defense is more important than paternity leave. You have like three options: Ban women from serving in the military, which as well as being overtly discriminatory has many key disadvantages. Ban paid maternity leave, so troops will avoid getting pre…
/r/MensRights17/05/15 08:04 PM
1

Well it was in the comment section of the newspaper, where well written but inflammatory opinions really should go. I strongly disagree with the sentiment, and I think debating it publicly (especially as it is such a laughably stupid line) is exactly what should be done. Don't celebrate censorship.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 11:52 AM
14

Petition them to stop selling the product that's offensive to you. Or actually don't, because both mugs are jokes and should be taken as such.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 07:28 PM
20

Nowhere on this coupon does it say men aren't elligable for the discount. This isn't a discount for women, it's a Women's Day Discount.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 05:26 PM
-2

Because in general, women are smaller and weaker than men, and a punch to the face would effect most women differently to most men.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 09:33 PM
-7

They aren't feminists, they're anti austerity protesters.
/r/MensRights25/12/14 09:47 PM
9

Who cares? These victims were failed by the system and their gender is irrelevant. Stop feministing mate, that isn't what we need.
/r/MensRights25/12/14 06:40 PM
1

Absolutely, but not in a way which would damage this film.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 07:04 PM
0

Your mum does.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 06:35 PM
2

You're fully wrong. Feminism isn't some boogeyman that exists everywhere; it's very restricted to certain media and political circles from which they project fuckloads of noise. This is an independent film, they would make it no matter what.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 04:17 PM
2

When I was 17, I knew very well whether or not I wanted to fuck. I was more than capable of giving consent. The idea that a 17 year old girl is any less capable is, I think, insulting to women.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 04:13 PM
4

In the UK, guns are a privilege. It is, in the majority opinion, better to be safe than sorry. It's up to the local police whether or not you get a license.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 09:05 PM
2

This is the wrong thing to do. They need to abolish selective service.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 09:50 AM
2

Maybe. But at this point, wouldn't you go straight to the store for a second test? I certainly fucking would. And when that one comes back negative, which it will because you'll stand there watching this woman piss (almost pissing yourself), you have two conflicting results. So then you'll probably get a third test, which will also come back negative. I can't see myself just accepting the result of one solitary pregnancy test.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 08:09 PM
1

You're an idiot, these two aren't even comparable.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 02:32 PM
3

Lots of hypotheticals coming my way, and no actual information from the trial or the history of supposed abuse.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 04:55 PM
2

You're right, but I don't see any suggestion of that in the article.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 04:45 PM
2

He was convicted. I'm not going to pretend that there is no bias in the courts, but I'm reluctant to believe that there was no evidence of abuse whatsoever.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 11:15 AM
3

Well that's a damn good point. That's perverting the course of justice, wasting police time etc. It's a much worse offence than the actual assault, and for that I think she does deserve jail time.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 07:08 PM
-2

One year for basically pushing him around? This is the sort of shit you see on playgrounds, and whilst the woman should NOT be pardoned; she's hardly a hardened criminal. If we start giving people a year in jail for non-violent touching, what kind of world will we live in?
/r/MensRights02/09/14 11:38 AM
1

Well surely this sub kind of exists to discuss how people should and shouldn't feel about gender issues, through the lens of the mens rights movement? As in "This is an issue which people should feel a certain way about; lets advocate it".
/r/MensRights02/09/14 11:36 AM
-2

I completely disagree with you. When you were a kid, didn't your siblings do shit like this to you? Mine did. It wasn't that big of a deal. A lot of this thread seems to be making out that this is a really horrible sex crime, when really it just isn't. Is it acceptable for a grown woman to do this to this man? Absolutely not. But I think probation is the perfect sentence. She's being discouraged from doing anything else wrong, and she has a criminal record for acting like a bully.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 11:35 AM
0

I'm not saying that what she did is aceptable. She should definitely be punished. Realistically though, I can think of a million things that are easily worse than this crime. My point is that a man committing a similar offence would be punished more, but he shouldn't be. The majority of the thread seems to be shouting for harsher punishment.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 11:32 AM
2

You know, I think this was an appropriate sentence. I think that if the genders were reversed, a male should receive the same punishment as this woman. This kind of assault is really very vanilla. What did she actually do? Touch him and make him feel uncomfortable. Whilst far from acceptable, probation is perfectly suitable for this woman, and all cases of this kind of assault.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 02:09 AM
1

That's exactly what I think man!
/r/MensRights19/08/14 12:46 PM
1

Yeah, that's right. And they're completely fucking wrong. When all laws give all men and women equal rights, it's up to the individual to change social attitudes. What, are we going to regulate who can do which job, and how many people of each gender can do what? Just because people are sexist in their own homes? Ridiculous.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 12:35 PM
1

Are we really going to judge which things we have to take seriously by what feminism has decided is serious?
/r/MensRights19/08/14 12:25 PM
2

Yeah, and both are examples of where prejudice against men is treated as though it's fact. But there aren't any laws saying "men get put in prison for longer" or "women get the kids in divorces". They're systematic problems, but they aren't rights as such.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 11:44 AM
2

The phrasing of the law is definitely clear in one aspect though; being forced to penetrate is a type of assault, and is a crime. Whether this is an acceptable charge to give to the perpetrator is certainly something we should debate, and I'm fully in favour of defining all forced sexual penetration, no matter whether the victim is being forced to penetrate, or being penetrated; being defined as rape. Again though, this is a result of an ongoing evolution of the way our laws work. Fifty years ag…
/r/MensRights19/08/14 01:07 AM
4

Yes, but those aren't rights; they're outcomes. Women don't have the right to force men into sex, it's just that the definition of rape in law is inaccurate. As for circumcision, I just don't think it's really relevant when we're talking about adult men and women and the rights they have/don't have. I'm completely against circumcision. I think it should be full criminalised, and anyone practising it should be thrown in jail. I just think it's the result of tradition, bad medicine, and bad lawmak…
/r/MensRights19/08/14 12:34 AM
4

It depends really on what you define as a right. If we talk about law, than I suppose the only real example of overt sexism is selective service. All other examples which OP gives are consequential, rather than legal.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 11:04 PM
-3

Well OP gives only one example of a legal right, and that's selective service; which doesn't apply in the UK.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 11:02 PM
7

Absolutely issues which need to be sorted out. Those are prime examples of where men are getting fucked over.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 10:23 PM
10

I'm still not convinced that women have more rights than men in America. Men have the shitty end of the deal when it comes to a lot of things, but it's hard being a woman sometimes too. I'm just unconvinced that women objectively have it better than men. I'm fully convinced, however, that feminism is fucking retarded.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 09:56 PM
2

You're absolutely right. That's kind of my point.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 01:01 PM
0

Certainly. I'm not complaining about the post, I'm just pointing out the relative importance of this issue.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 06:40 PM
1

I certainly will. Maybe ebola should be the main concern for now.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 06:18 PM
-18

THIS IS AFRICA. Whilst this is horrible, the continent has many problems to deal with before this becomes the more pressing one.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 01:19 AM
5

Some posts here are fucking ridiculous.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 01:49 PM
7

The point is, the gender of those who browse /b/ is irrelevant. Bringing up your genitalia is a party foul, for which you must pay the penalty or leave.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 12:23 PM
-3

That isn't how democracy works though, is it? There are people who believe that rape should be legal, but we don't hesitate to condemn their stupid opinion do we?
/r/MensRights11/07/14 12:57 AM
-8

Omg, u r so edgy.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 12:06 AM
-2

You're literally trolling yourself.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 12:05 AM
-3

And since then, we have decided that blacks are people too; as is the demonstrable truth. Previously, we were ignorant of the fact that race was an inaccurate measurement of just how human somebody was. Often deliberately so. But we can say that we were wrong about that, and now we are right. In the same way, we must deduce the truth about abortion. What makes murder wrong, and is abortion any different? Well, that's a really big discussion, but I think it boils down to this: unborn, un-thinking…
/r/MensRights11/07/14 12:05 AM
-3

You have mis-understood what the common definition of the phrase "reproductive rights" is.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 11:55 PM
-5

We have decided, as a democratic society, that abortion is not the same as murder. Your willingness to compare the two only reveals your bias. The fact of the matter is, abortion is a right. If you deny that it should be, then you have no ground to stand on when it comes to protecting men's reproductive rights.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 11:23 PM
-4

Lol.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 11:12 PM
-3

Troll supporter.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 11:05 PM
-1

Sure, and I believe that she should have been removed by the police just as anyone should be. These people have a right to voice their opinion. Said opinion however, is fucking awful. It's like standing on a street corner with signs saying "send the niggers home". You have a right to say it, but you doing so is a fucking vile thing to say, and so people will be angered by it. Was the woman in the right? Of course not. She's a twat. Should these people be allowed to do what they are doing? Of cou…
/r/MensRights10/07/14 11:05 PM
-4

If that opinion is one which wants to forcefully take away other's reproductive rights, then you are a twat. I could stand in the town square and politely talk about how I believed in the forceful execution of all clowns, but that wouldn't make my opinion any more or less toxic. This sub is full of people pointing out the injustices that men go through, and when their reproductive rights are denied to them. You would think that you could spot when support for such injustice, but directed at wome…
/r/MensRights10/07/14 11:02 PM
0

Who's making that decision though? Should you have a council, and a president? Because I don't know if that neutral stance really is representative of everyone involved in your movement.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 09:44 PM
-11

I think it's the group of people wanting to restrict her reproductive rights that set her off. Everyone in this video is a twat, basically.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 09:42 PM
0

I think there are fascists of all colours.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 09:42 PM
-2

Troll.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 09:41 PM
0

Troll.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 09:41 PM
-7

Well you know, if somebody was standing around trying to take away my reproductive rights, I may well start a fight with them. I'm not behind the woman here, nor am I supporting the pro life people. I think everyone involved in this are bad people, and I condemn all of their actions.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 09:39 PM
16

Wanting to fuck somebody isn't the same as treating them like an object.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 03:36 PM
3

It's really easy to classify pedophilia. It's the attraction to pre-pubescent children. Really, it's that simple.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 02:32 PM
2

In my opinion, consent exists in two degrees: Legal, and natural. Now I'm not advocating having sex with people who are underage, but I'd say at 16, it's certain that people are both willing and able to have sex.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 11:21 PM
4

This seems to be based on a complete misunderstanding of what the word paedophile means. If they've gone through puberty, it's not paedophilia. It might not be ok to have sex with them, but it isn't paedophillia. The idea that 16 year olds, no matter the gender, can't consent to sex is obviously false. The idea that anyone who sleeps with a 16 year old is a paedophile is laughable.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 09:59 PM
5

Precisely. I don't have anything against Maher, I think he's pretty good sometimes. But this bit is just not funny.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 12:50 PM
11

Well that's just way out of line. You can joke about anything, and it can be funny. But this segment just seems in bad taste.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 12:09 PM
3

Ridiculous.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 06:01 PM
7

I'm not sure you could, but I wouldn't be surprised if you did. It's not even a problem really. The fact is, she did something wrong and she's being punished. Whatever fucked up justification she has for doing what she did is her business.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 07:53 PM
9

I never said the law was treating her differently. I just think it shows an attitude which is used exclusively by female child abusers to excuse their actions. You'd never see a man try this shit in court.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 07:44 PM
1

That is also my opinion.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 04:56 PM
26

Oh, so people who can't consent actually can. It's one story when the victims female, and another when it's male.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 04:46 PM
10

Two ways of looking at this: All men are terrible, and sometimes women are too. -or- People are terrible, women aren't an exception.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 04:43 PM
3

Yup. Men who don't put up with abusive relationships ain't real mens.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 02:02 PM
2

It is important that we don't over use antibiotics. They are a medicine which needs to be preserved for future generations.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 10:26 PM
10

Good call. The quality of discussion is of upmost importance.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 06:48 PM
1

Everything about this is absurd my friend. I don't really feel strongly one way or the other.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 09:31 PM
1

Were they doing this in the school building itself?
/r/MensRights25/05/14 09:10 PM
13

I think it has to do with the sheer bluntness with which the viewers point of view is switched. Every time anyone talked about gender issues when I was growing up, it was men who were the bad guys, and women who were the victims. To watch somebody so easily explain why other points of view are not only valid, but that there is evidence to support those views, makes an incredible impression. Having been raised religious, it's like the first time somebody tells you that they don't believe in god.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 08:16 PM
0

If you get this affected by somebody calling you names, you need to get a job outside of the service industry.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 07:01 PM
6

Ok. There is no such thing as reverse sexism. There is only sexism, and the concept of discrimination doesn't care about the gender of the victim of discrimination.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 06:28 PM
-10

You're a fucking moron if you can't see the differences between those two situations. And I disagree with you if you think you need to focus on mens issues every time there are issues which affect women.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 07:45 PM
-6

But what's happening to the girls is happening now.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 06:48 PM
-11

I think she is dealing with the issue that global media has presented to her. I'm not saying she shouldn't help boys because the media don't care, I'm saying she can't get the media to care if she tries to help boys. Either way, I don't think she's in the wrong here. At this time it's the 200 GIRLS who we should all be thinking about.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 05:04 PM
22

Ah, so you're in favor of double standards? Should a Lumberjill be paid less then a Lumberjack then?
/r/MensRights12/05/14 04:55 PM
0

That's a distinction you should only use if you want to publicly side with pedophiles. And if that's what this sub turns into, I'm out.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 04:25 PM
4

I'm sure your dick is sensitive. I'm sure it is less sensitive than it would be, were you not circumcised.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 02:22 PM
26

Of course, women cannot step out of their front door without being called a slag. Totally accurate.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 06:49 PM
13

That isn't an apology. That's not even regretfull.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 05:41 PM
5

Surely to survey mensrights, you would need to post here to direct people to the survey. If there's no post, call bullshit.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 01:41 PM
8

That's because feminism as a whole blames men for gender issues, refuses to accept that male issues are as important as female issues, and generally doesn't actually care about men. Feminism can't change, it's completely gynocentric and exists solely to promote women's issues. Now that would be ok if feminism allowed the mens rights movement to coexist peacefully, but it doesn't. Feminism is completely opposed to the idea of men having their own movement for the promotion and solution of mens is…
/r/MensRights13/04/14 10:36 AM
32

It kind of seems as though people haven't really read this sub. I mean, a lot of content on here is just bitching about things which don't matter. I see posts quite a lot which are basically just a long thread of not-quite-logic, completely lacking in any evidence. But most of this sub is just a collection of examples showing that in a whole bunch of areas, men get the short end of the stick. Almost all the commenters talk about how nobody should get the short end of the stick, and that it's bee…
/r/MensRights12/04/14 08:48 PM
43

This isn't even a joke. There's no punchline here, I don't see how you could find this funny.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 05:50 PM
53

Her plan was to hold her husband at gunpoint and "force him to work through their problems" and "stop being so mean". This is ridiculous. Really.
/r/PussyPass20/03/14 03:53 PM
3

Stories in which the protagonist outsmarts a fool allow the audience many different things. If you see somebody in an advert use a certain website to get better insurance than someone who is portrayed as stupid, the audience may think: "Hey, I'll be as smart as them if I use that particular insurance website". An audience will usually feel positively about a character who "outsmarts" their peers, ad agencies and producers use this to get the audience to associate that positivity with a product. …
/r/MensRights13/03/14 05:10 PM
2

Crux not cruz my friend.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 10:54 PM
59

"No man has ever approached us asking for support" Well maybe that's because you're convinced that women always have it much worse.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 04:34 PM
3

I made a complaint, go complain at them. Hopefully we can at least give the impression that a minority are against this.
/r/MensRights09/02/14 10:53 PM
21

Well how about a quota for black people? NO MORE ALL WHITE PANEL SHOWS!! LETS PRESCRIBE COMEDY!!!.
/r/MensRights09/02/14 02:10 PM
3

I don't think the victim liked having to drink bleach. But yes, it's brilliant actually. It's a horror film, kind of low budget but it's definitely interesting.
/r/PussyPass26/01/14 01:42 PM
6

Noted. I'm much less annoyed at this now, she was basically complicit in somebody elses crime. On another note, ever seen the Australian movie The Loved Ones? It's basically this article.
/r/PussyPass26/01/14 12:17 AM
20

She raped a guy who had been tied to a chair, forced to drink bleach, and burned with a flamethrower. That's fucking horrific. I'm going to find her address and shit in her letterbox.
/r/PussyPass26/01/14 12:09 AM
-7

I got to the words "blue pill" before I realised both you, and the author are idiots.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 10:06 PM
22

Woooooooow, hows that shoe feel on THE OTHER FUCKING FOOT. But realistically, she's right. Alimony is ridiculous and should be gotten rid of. It's just fucking stupid that she can't see that millions of men have been in her position. I mean, she feels entitled to leave the marriage for free. She feels as though because she's the woman, her husband cannot both take alimony and retain his dignity. How fucked up do you have to be to not spot your own fucking sexism?
/r/MensRights18/01/14 09:14 PM
22

Wow, a genuine good ol' bunch of lies. If your group needs to lie in order to keep itself looking like the right answer to the worlds problems, what are the chances that you're actually the answer to the worlds problems?
/r/MensRights14/01/14 05:50 PM
1

I would tell her to fuck off. Then, if her reaction was to get violet, I would try and ask her to calm down. If she kept being aggressive then I would threaten to tase her, and follow through if she persisted. There is a deep hypocrisy here, because you will often here your stereotypical liberal female talking about how women are just as strong as men. But give them a chance and they'll tell you about how women need to be allowed self defence devices, such as tasers, because they aren't as stron…
/r/MensRights23/12/13 09:31 AM
2

There are facts; men have issues which are rarely adressed, and should be. Talk about them honestly, and don't come off as though these issues are more important than any other just because they effect men. People I've met almost always get on my side when I calmly tell them the facts. And if they don't, then you have to accept it. Don't be childish, however infuriating they may become.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 05:25 PM
0

How can someone say that women are more likely to be victims of violence? It's fucking obviously untrue. Although I don't think feminism is a hate movement. I think that they are, in the majority, incredibly misled. And the people who are misleading them are sometimes hateful.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 05:48 PM
15

I just think it's funny that violence against women is somehow more important than violence against men. All violence is equally bad, I don't get why we have to focus on women.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 07:28 PM
0

I'm against falling into the trap of becoming passive aggressive moaners who make things like comics which are neither based on real data, nor make a difference. However, from personal experience I agree with you and I like your style.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 10:58 PM
2

They are two completely different issues. Circumcision isn't a cosmetic surgery, it's mutilation. The point isn't so that penises look nicer, it's to prevent males from being able to masturbate. That's the point in MGM. And how is this hypocritical? It seems to be the logical step according to your reasoning? They can't ban one specific cosmetic surgery, so they ban all elective surgery on minors? How is that hypocritical?
/r/MensRights02/12/13 11:27 PM
2

That would fall under the category of a medical necessity. They're banning things like breast implants, not repair work and things like that.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 11:24 PM
3

Screenshot and save, then revert the edits? You can't let the vandalism of wikipedia stand really. The more people do it, the less the site is worth. Even when opinions which are compatible with mine are inserted into articles, I try my hardest to make sure they're factually correct, or remove them.
/r/MensRights01/12/13 07:49 PM
5

You don't have to be a self righteous fuckwad either. Write with humility, that way people might actually consider your views.
/r/MensRights25/11/13 12:41 AM
3

Not so great for me, I was wrong!
/r/MensRights24/11/13 10:39 PM
6

My point was, and always will be that both genders are fucked over by the way our civilisation does things. Also, consider why you can't think of any ways women are negatively impacted by society. Perhaps you have let confirmation bias muddy your view on the subject. That being said, you seem to have a point there. For the life of me, I can't think of any way in which women are negatively impacted by legislation or government, just because they are women. I've thought about the courts, the lawma…
/r/MensRights24/11/13 09:38 PM
0

My society doesn't have a draft. And you have to remember that the draft is a relic of the mid 20th century which could easily be overturned if there was any pressure at all put on the american government. But it's a bit of a non-issue at the minute, as america isn't in a state of total war. Just out of interest, because I don't know, if you sign up for selective service in a time of peace, or very limited conflict, will you be drafted into the armed forces?
/r/MensRights24/11/13 09:31 PM
1

you think so? Every person I know believes i equality, and thinks feminism is crap.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 08:47 PM
5

Men are no more oppressed than women are. Where is the evidence to say that men are abused or oppressed by women more than any group is abused or oppressed by another? Hint, it doesn't exist. Also, I think you'll find that I never asked this fellow to lie. I do however think that there are better ways to win people over to truth than to start claiming that "men are systematically abused". The point in a report isn't to alienate people. The point is to pursuade them to agree with you. As for you,…
/r/MensRights24/11/13 08:30 PM
6

I recommend you don't write the report in a certain way, which lots of people fall into doing. Don't write your report as though men get the short end of the stick, because they don't. Men and women are treated equally shitty by society for being men and women in different contexts. The difference is, that most issues that come about due to sexism which negatively impact men are ignored by society. FOCUS ON THAT OR YOU WILL COME ACROSS AS A SELF-RIGHTEOUS ARSEHOLE. The main reason people dislike…
/r/MensRights24/11/13 07:03 PM
1

Cheers Kiddo <3
/r/MensRights23/11/13 12:24 AM
3

I'm not clicking on a freethoughtblogs link, come back when you have a link to a website which isn't run like a communist state.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 10:27 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter