TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

These_Rent_2503 Archive

View 0 posts and 226 comments by These_Rent_2503 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

To be fair people are hypocritical at all ages. Standard X for me, standard Y for thee.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/26 07:37 AM
1

Not sure how the second part of your sentence relates to what I was saying. As for the first part, he wasn't convicted for violent crime, which is what I was highlighting and what conservatives care more about because it can have a direct impact on their safety and every day life. They should care more about white collar crime and corruption, for sure. Ideally the justice system would be tough on all types of crimes. It would do a lot for a restored sense of justice, the free market and against …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 02:16 PM
1

Many such cases and it's not limited to the example you mentioned. Performative progressive are also very good at shielding themselves from the consequences of their idealistic worldview and offloading them onto the working class.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/26 04:53 PM
1

Dumping the kid into the foster care system is the paper abortion for women and has existed for a long time already. I'm not sure what other option you're envisioning here.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 07:55 PM
1

Is this you OP? 😬
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 03:50 PM
1

Some do enjoy it and they reap outsized benefits. For most it's stressful.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 03:34 PM
–

Working out regularly does in fact make a man not average in 2026
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 01:15 PM
1

If she's out of your league and you know it, yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 01:04 PM
1

"We should treat all men like they might be the asshole. But if we treat all men like they might be the asshole then we are bad" This is a disingenuous argument because potentially dangerous men in public spaces (the situation OP is referring to) are easy to spot.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 12:58 PM
1

Maybe not for you but everything points to this, from statistics about the growing number of women being happily single to the numerous women on this sub and others saying sex is not (that) important to them. Heck, it's not even western women, material comfort is #1 for women in every country/culture, from NYC to the slums of Calcutta and a man's net worth/income is a decisive factor (and conversely, a man losing his job is correlated with divorce but a woman losing her job is not). Men know thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 09:00 AM
1

This
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 08:18 AM
1

Ah yes that tracks. My brother is 27 and his gf is bi, too. It has its perks.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 07:29 AM
–

I tend to agree with you but the issue is that governments/societies are not letting the selection process unfold naturally and try to prop up the economy and finance pensions by importing very religious demographics.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 10:16 PM
1

It's like this thread the other day about women being too soft on crime.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 10:07 PM
1

This is an interesting perspective but it sounds alien from a male POV because most straight men recoil at the idea/sight of male gay sex. I live in a very gay-friendly city (well, it used to be), I have gay friends, I'm pro same sex marriage, I wish gay people nothing but happiness, but if a gay/shemale sex thumbnail slips in the suggestions on PH I am disgusted for several minutes, like the dog getting Vietnam flashbacks in the meme.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 10:05 PM
4

Just out of curiosity, how old are you?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 09:42 PM
18

Look I'm pretty sure any random gay guy I'd meet in a darkroom is going to give me a BJ technically 10x better than what my wife can do. Do I want any of that? Not with a 10-foot pole.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 09:39 PM
1

Having the traits to be chosen by one woman is one thing, having the traits to keep a relationship alive for a lifetime is another.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 09:27 PM
4

"Research consistently shows married men live longer, report higher life satisfaction, have better health outcomes and accumulate more wealth than unmarried men." People who repeat this forget that the fact that A and B are correlated doesn't necessarily mean that A causes B. In this case there's a good chance that the factors that make a man marriage material in the eyes of women also influence life satisfaction, health and wealth positively.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 09:22 PM
5

Men's desire is inconvenient because it can be tied to coercion. The opposite is almost never true.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 09:17 PM
3

It seems like men experience it as a need but women don't. Men are like golden retrievers they will be over the moon if you give them a t-bone steak but they'll also eat slop from the can and be happy, the more the better. Women are more like foodie bloggers. If they're going to put the energy into leaving the house then the food better be tasty and new, and the service impeccable. All restaurants around them don't seem to be worth the effort? No problem a hot pocket in the microwave brings comf…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 09:14 PM
-2

For men. For western women material comfort is #1.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 09:05 PM
0

Personality is like a typical modern feminist and is into art, culture, history and hates capitalism and billionaires. -> There's feminist and feminist. Is she the man-hating aggressive type or does she just disagree with you on gender topics but is open to agree to disagree? -> There's more to personality than just views on gender issues and topics of interest. Is she easy going or bitchy? Is she an extrovert or introvert? Does she have unhealthy attention seeking/validation behaviour? Is she f…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 04:30 PM
1

*Starts furiously googling for the little bump on the counter trick.*
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 02:33 PM
1

You forgot opening pickle jars
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 12:36 PM
1

"In fact women who were married to peasants were often much more intelligent, capable and hard-working than their husbands." Source?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 12:26 PM
1

Was your comment directed at me personally?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 06:46 AM
1

17 years and counting in my case.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 03:27 PM
4

I'd argue people don't move in fast enough, it's a very good compatibility test and avoids sunk cost fallacy ("I've already invested so many years in this relationship so let's try to make this work although his bad habits are gnawing at me").
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 02:20 PM
2

You can have a happy relationship with a woman who doesn't hold men in high esteem as long as you continuously prove her that you're the exception. All of her friends will complain about their guy, split/get divorced and she will know what she has, cherish it and treat you well.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 12:38 PM
1

It's not so much that I don't trust men as a group, but I don't like the odds. Estimates vary but let's be conservative and assume 1% of men are pedos. I wouldn't sign up my children for a sky diving experience if they had a 1% of dying.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 12:32 PM
1

It's not so much that I don't trust men as a group, but I don't like the odds on this. Estimates vary but let's be conservative and assume 1% of men are pedos. I wouldn't sign up my children for a sky diving experience if they had a 1% of dying.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 12:31 PM
1

There's definitely an element of ego protection at play but, at a more fundamental level, it's also about safety. Men are stronger than women and, statistically speaking, the most dangerous man in a woman's life is her partner. So if the guy makes a sweeping generalization hinting at the fact that he doesn't respect women, the chances are higher that she will be on the receiving end of DA/DV.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 12:19 PM
2

There are plenty of women out there who LOVE to hear men say, "You're not like other girls" People love to feel special in the eyes of their partner but the phrasing matters. "I've never felt this with any other girl" -> ZOMG yes he thinks I'm special, I'm hearing wedding bells 🤩 "You're not like the other girls" -> WTF you misogynist pig
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 11:54 AM
–

This is cope disguised as stoicism.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 09:53 AM
2

Still, being a team doesn't mean everyone has the same role. You being willing to do household chores doesn't mean you get a pass not to be the man anymore. You need to satisfy her frontal lobes (equality!) and lizard brain (I want a real man!). If you want to keep having sex on the regular, keep your house and see your kids everyday you have to do both. Yes it's a ton of work. It's "unfair" but it is what it is and whining about it doesn't help, it only makes her less attracted to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 09:50 AM
6

I find it best to ridiculize what she just said in a fun way. Like I'd put my hands over my mouth and start imitating Bane in The Dark Knight "is that better now woman? Do you want me to go hide in the darkness? Fine. I was born in it, molded by it. I didn't see the light until I was already a man." then I'd give her a pat on the head and resume what I was doing. But if she's annoyed by your breathing you're probably already too far down the ick pit to come back from it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 09:39 AM
9

Not necessarily because she thinks she made a bad choice. In the beginning you have the novelty effect, dopamine levels are high, you fuck all the time, it makes it easy to have a high tolerance threshold. You know ho men have post-nut clarity? Women have post-high-libido-honeymoon-phase clarity.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 09:26 AM
1

"Red pill dating advice usually depends on gaining a ton of leverage over the woman you’re with either with money or options etc" If you go to the married red pill subreddit you will find that this is largely not true. The advice given there is focused on leading, making plans, lifting weights, fixing shit in the house, maintaining the sexual tension, calling out disrespectful speech/behaviour without sounding like a whiny kid, defusing shit tests and keeping your issues/doubts to yourself. I di…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 09:21 AM
2

Yes there was a sort of golden parenthesis in the history of mankind between the end of arranged marriages and the advent of smartphones and social media. In loving memory Game and confidence 1950 - 2008 You will be missed
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 09:05 AM
–

Of course it's math, different TFRs + high levels of immigration = population replacement in the long run. It's not anything new, it has happened several times in history. My personal fantasy is turning back the clock to the goldilocks era of 1990/2000, I'd rather not live in Afghanistan. You can live your best life but the generations of women that will come after you will not.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 08:57 AM
2

"with a lot of self destructive tendencies" There's a plethora of men out there who are not like this. Maybe it's the type of men you're attracted to in the first place? My wife has a friend like this. She's smart (doctor) and she's a very sweet girl but she had a weird childhood with a psychotic mother and her tolerance for red flag behaviour is way too high. All of her men since 2010 have been basket cases. The first one gave her HIV, the second one forced her to go to swinger parties, the 3rd…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 08:52 AM
–

If the guys are already in a relationship they're by definition out of the pool of guys who could approach
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 08:37 AM
1

I don't think they're advocating for this, it's simply an answer to your initial comment "how did men from past generations did it?". They didn't need game and the confidence to approach women because the vast majority of marriages since the dawn of civilization have been arranged ones (and yes in some cases minors were involved and it's still the case in countries like Afghanistan). Love marriages are a relatively recent phenomenon.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 08:01 PM
2

Could it be that you have an avoidant attachment style? Not being sure about your husband sounds wild.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 07:48 PM
1

It's usually a mix of different signs that make it clear in combination: - holding your gaze a little too long repeatedly - laughing at silly jokes - touching/hitting your arm if you tease them - finding ways to be around you more than would be natural - compliments about outfit/perfume - responding to playfulness with playfulness Not all girls do this of course but I've never had a false positive when I was a bachelor.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 07:46 PM
2

I think the friend zone is a bit of a misnomer, it should be called the "only as a friend zone". Between the ages of 18 and 25, several female friends confessed their crush on me and unfortunately it either wasn't mutual or I was taken, which made things awkward. At that point I stopped having female friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 07:33 PM
2

Lucky guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 07:24 PM
1

Ever heard of Germany? They solved this with alcohol.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 07:21 PM
1

Ace of base?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 07:20 PM
1

Lol what do you mean "y'all" I'm fine thanks. Alright, let's try it a different way: imagine I make a living pulling off romance scams. Which picture should I go for, left or right? Be honest, my kids' lives depend on it. <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 07:12 PM
–

Bury your head in the sand all you want, it's simple math.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 06:45 PM
–

How would you feel if you didn't have breakfast this morning?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 12:39 PM
–

And by thick sandwiches you mean...
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 12:29 PM
–

For a monogamous LTR definitely, yes
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 12:27 PM
–

This sounds oddly specific. OP did your ex have a micro penis by any chance?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 12:24 PM
–

This sounds oddly specific. OP did your ex have a micro penis by any chance?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 12:24 PM
–

I hate to break it to you but there are other cultures on this planet that are not going the way of the dodo and they are not women friendly.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 12:20 PM
–

That doesn't give you a get out of jail free card. If you don't pull your load either directly or indirectly in the household you're toast, too.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 12:18 PM
1

Sure you have your personal taste, but if you aggregate the data patterns emerge. Take 100 girls, make them rate 100 guys. Do you expect tiers to emerge or is the data going to be completely random? Of course it's the former. Some guys are going to be in most (yes, I'm aware, not all) girls' top 10, some guys are going to be in most girls bottom 10.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 11:24 AM
1

That's not the point I was making with this question. I was just showing you that you also do pattern matching based off a limited sample and that's ok, not weird. You gotta do what's best for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 11:16 AM
4

Well, who doesn't want to have their cake and eat it? 😄
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 11:14 AM
2

Being attractive, confident, having game and being fun to be around is what gets you selected (not necessarily all of these combined, 1-2 is enough to not die alone). Treating women well is a factor that makes relationships last, with a big caveat which is that "treating women well" can have different interpretations and some of them are detrimental to a lasting relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 11:08 AM
1

Not talking about OP, I was responding to the interaction above my comment
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 10:55 AM
2

That's the point I'm making, hypergamy is the root cause. - women now graduating college at higher rates, making more money than ever and being Instagram-brained set the bar higher for what it means to be a top man. - top men having so much choice via dating apps means they are tougher to secure. Top, "decent" men in their age bracket (decent = ready to commit to them and egalitarian in the household) are a scarce commodity.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 10:51 AM
0

You don't pick up the pace when followed by a sketchy looking hoody wearing man at night?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 04:28 PM
3

Of course they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 04:24 PM
4

Could be, but it's more likely that these guys are already taken.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 11:57 AM
3

This is usually not how things happen. It's more like the topic pops up in a discussion at work or in a group of friends and every woman present give their 2 cents.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 11:55 AM
0

It's not weird, it's been an evolutionary advantage to draw conclusions from patterns even when the sample is not statistically significant.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 11:53 AM
2

I think what OP meant was "manspreading", not just getting a panic attack because you overthink your sitting position.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 11:51 AM
1

"why can't confident men who approach also be decent? They can but they are more rare, simply because positive qualities like attractiveness, grit or having a strong moral compass are not equally distributed. "plenty of decent men already in relationships btw, every day thousands probably get in relationships." The fact that a significant portion of the limited supply of decent, confident men in their age bracket already got secured by other women makes the problem worse for the ones still on th…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 10:41 AM
1

"This reads like another post with the implication that only two kinds of men exist: the attractive asshole or the ugly decent nice guy." I agree the dichotomy is too extreme but I'd be interested to know the actual distribution between these categories: - attractive "asshole" - attractive + decent (they have options but they voluntarily choose to be decent) - ugly nice guy (decent by nature) - ugly nice guy (forced decency, has to be nice because he doesn't have much going for him) My intuition…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 10:30 AM
8

Tbf there are situations where people get nervous without thinking the person they're talking to is a god or a sorcerer (job interviews, public speaking, etc.). The thing is that as a man no one cares about your feelings to you need to get over it and practice to get used to it and get better.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 10:15 AM
5

I don't think they're mad about not getting approached by men they deem unattractive. They're mad about the short supply of top, "decent" men in their age bracket once they feel ready to start a family (decent = ready to commit to them and egalitarian in the household).
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 10:12 AM
3

There's definitely an element of "if he's afraid to approach physically weak people, how is he going to react if I hear noise in the dark at night".
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 10:02 AM
6

There's certainly a selection bias in my sample (I work with college educated millennials/gen z in progressive European cities) but if the topic ever comes up in IRL conversation almost all women share this view. The only exception I know is my wife.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 09:56 AM
3

Tbf he said best, not decent.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 09:40 AM
1

Not to sound like Jordan Peterson but why do we even mean by "best" in this case? If we're talking about "highest potential to be selected by women" then it's not about fairness, just natural selection. If we're talking about "most decent/most likely to treat a woman well" then yeah the sentence is not necessarily true but then again, where is that willingness to treat women well stemming from? Genuine decency or realization that one has not much else to offer?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 09:39 AM
3

Yes and no. Having a decent % of risk-affine people is what got us where we are as a species. I'd argue that the increase in risk aversion/fear of loss we've seen in the last decades in the West is a factor that contributes to our current woes.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 09:17 AM
16

I get what you're saying but if things have to be this complicated then we're doomed as a civilization. I'm not saying species because there are still cultures on this planet that don't have the reproductive fitness of pandas.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 09:12 AM
6

The difference is you can't guilt trip or shame beggars, pickpockets and dubious salesmen into not talking to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 09:10 AM
1

Just to clarify, do you mean ice hockey or field hockey?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 02:10 PM
6

This but I reckon it's going to become less and less effective if more men catch on and start using 3rd places as a way to meet girls. My 11 yo is shorter than boys his age and I'm not sure where he's going to end up height wise so i thought it'd be a good idea to sign him up for choir and breakdancing. If he keeps it up and develops decent skills he has a chance to not stay a virgin until he's 28.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 02:07 PM
5

All of this is about as insightful as saying “Better looking men attract more women,” which is to say, not insightful at all. It’s common sense. Yes and the reverse is true as well. The difference is that guys will "like" a broad range of women from average to very attractive. As per the data, on Hinge 80% of women won't go below the top 25% of men in terms of attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 01:56 PM
1

No you don't need to grow up, this is how it is for us.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 06:41 AM
2

Also you're bound to see couples outside, it doesn't tell you much about the % of single people.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 06:30 AM
1

Could it be a standard problem maybe? Looking at the rate of divorce for heterosexual vs gay vs lesbian marriages, it seems women have a much lower tolerance threshold.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 06:27 AM
1

Does being broke affect dating in the gay community to the same extent?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 06:23 AM
3

Ha ha yeah I need to know too, because my brain can't come up with country where arranged marriages with cousins is so prevalent but where you can also freely date in your 20s. I'm sure I'm missing an easy one lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 06:04 AM
1

I'm not convinced women actually find it "hot", it's more that the opposite (a man not pulling his weight in the household) is a big turn off but for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 08:10 PM
1

It's certainly true for some but it heavily depends on the age of the kids, number of kids, wife's job, man's degree of involvement in household stuff, man's level of fitness. If you don't want it more than once a week then you do you but it's a bit dismissive to call men childish for wanting more.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 07:55 PM
1

A woman wrote this
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 07:49 PM
1

It doesn't have to be over. We've been together 17 years, 3 kids and we're still very in love.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 07:24 PM
1

I could be wrong but the way I interpret this is a man with a top 1% salary can hire people to make life much easier (nanny, cleaning lady, chef, etc.) which frees up mental capacity for sex since women worry and are much more "in their head" than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 07:19 PM
1

They separated after I moved out.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 10:20 PM
2

It doesn't really make sense to look at the average and infer your risk based on that. It depends a lot on your age at birth, BMI and ethnicity.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 11:17 AM
2

In my circle of friends and acquaintances, I can't think of a single family where the man doesn't change diapers or the woman gave up on her career. I live in Germany, maybe it plays a role (but it doesn't do much for our TFR).
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 09:41 AM
7

Yes statistics point to this. Men in my generation (Millenials) invest more hours in child rearing than boomer women did. They still invest fewer hours than Millenial women. The total hours invested in child rearing by both parents has gone up significantly for good and bad reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 09:37 AM
0

These sound like reasonable arguments but wanting a family is not a rational decision. If you want it really bad the side effects don't matter much.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 09:30 AM
2

The "provocation" doesn't need to be too bad for the derogatory comments to rear their ugly head. It ranges from having the wrong political views to men just revving up their car engine (fwiw I think it denotes a lack of class but I don't jump straight to small dick/napoleon complex explanations like I've seen women do). They'll give men they approve of (politically, etc.) a pass, but the disdain is there deep down, it just needs a trigger.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 09:09 AM
0

See my other answers. There are countries where people are given many chances and need to fuck up really bad several times before ending up in prison but they keep doing crime anyway. This is because for a certain type of person, a life of crime is "sexier" (more lucrative and nicer for their ego) than working the modestly paid, boring and/or backbreaking 9-5 jobs available to high school dropouts.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 08:57 AM
1

Where did you get the slut thing? I swear it's impossible to argue in good faith on this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 08:43 AM
2

I give up.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 11:01 PM
2

"its about offering people other avenues to make a living" You conveniently ignored my point about France. You'd need to offer these career criminals ways to make the same money they make with drug trafficking. There are no such jobs available to high school dropouts. Re Japan: well then Japanese women shall be glad to hear that giving these sex offenders lenient sentences will reduce the chances of them re-offending (just following your theory here). If you don't like the Japan example, look at…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 10:36 PM
2

There are countries with extremely lenient justice systems where people become career criminals anyway (France). It's a matter of incentives (high earning potential compared to the 9-5 jobs available for people with lower-than-average IQ, low risk of harsh sentences). At the other end of the spectrum there are countries with extremely harsh justice and prison systems and a very low crime rate (Japan).
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 10:13 PM
2

Oh ok I recognize your user name from another thread. You seem to have a tendency to use straw men ("so you're saying all men", "kill all the criminals"). No point arguing with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 09:30 PM
1

Why do you immediately jump to all men? That's not what I said. What I'm saying is in general in life if something seems to good to be true, caution is warranted. If I get an email telling me my great aunt in America put me in her will I'm going to reach out to my attorney to check the validity. I would give myself a 7 (8 if I was 2 inches taller). If a girl looking like a model cold approached me on in a bar and gave me her number I'd assume she's a SW or my organs are about to be harvested. If…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 09:25 PM
2

The government doesn't decide on who gets a death sentence. Yes it's a shame he'd dead because he can't testify and help bust the guilty people in his network. Other than that I'm not confident he would have gotten life without parole so yes death is a good outcome. He can't hurt anyone where he's now. Read my other answer for another example that proves OPs point.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 09:12 PM
2

I'm not your buddy, pal (again, expand answers if you shall be so generous and open minded)
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 09:06 PM
3

Thank you for proving OP's point. Btw if you look into the data at a more granular level, you will see that repeat offenders are responsible for most crime. First time arrests represented less than 5% of all state prison admissions in 2014. Give someone a second chance? Sure. This is not what we're talking about here though. The data shows we're giving people a 9th, 10th...31st chance?! Do you feel comfortable having the people in that right most red candle on the streets?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 09:05 PM
-1

Lol. Who are you to demand stuff from me we don't know each other. The person I'm answering to didn't mention a specific number of examples. That's the first that came to mind. You're welcome to expand answers to find another example I provided.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 08:51 PM
1

My point was that if someone feels insecure about their looks then logically they will "undersell" themselves, not pursue the super hot guy who has tons of options. Beauty is subjective in a way yes, but it's also not. If you take a panel of 100 women and make them rate 100 men based on looks, no ranking will be exactly alike but you'll see tiers emerge. Some guys will be in most girls' top 10, some guys will be in most girls' bottom 10, etc. The reverse (men rating women) is true as well. You c…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 08:47 PM
3

<image> https://www.ojp.gov/library/publications/public-views-towards-crime-and-correctional-policies-there-gender-gap There's this study from 2002 that concludes that "men and women tend to hold moderately divergent views. Women tend to express greater support for offender treatment and less support for punishment than men". Now keep in mind that this study was conducted almost 25 years ago. Since then, young women have become significantly more liberal while men have become slightly more conse…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 08:23 PM
2

https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2018/06/FT_18.06.08_DeathPenalty_gender-racial-differences.png
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 08:02 PM
1

You seem lovely. Lucky man you got there.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 07:58 PM
1

What about my second point?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 07:52 PM
2

"The world consists of more variety than confident manipulative hypersexual narcissists and slow-burning neutered nice guys" The reality is harsher than this. Most men are hypersexual in theory, at least before they feel ready to start a family. If you're not convinced, look at the sex life of gay men. That's how things would be in the hetero world too, if women had the same sexuality as men. The thing is that the vast majority of men don't have what it takes to be hypersexual so they don't have…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 03:11 PM
2

"They reason they're so good at it? Because they center their lives around it." No, not necessarily. Actually they're more likely not to. But yes, agree with your general premise. One player can bamboozle hundreds of women during his lifetime and do a lot of damage. Like in many areas, there's a power law at play. 1 % of the population is accountable for 63 % of all violent crime convictions. The top 10% of drinkers account for ~50% of US alcohol consumption, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 02:45 PM
1

A quick Google search returns 1.7% to 2.9% of the general population affected by BDD. Even assuming body dysmorphia can be understood in a wider sense (just being insecure about certain traits), surely it would lead the people affected to underestimate their attractiveness and go for more attainable potential partners. Don't you think?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 01:49 PM
2

There's no perfect way but you can increase your chances as a woman by making the guy jump through hoops to see if there's more than just pure sexual interest.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 01:36 PM
1

Is that a thing? I have a pretty good idea of which women would be in my league if I was single (and which ones would not).
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 01:33 PM
–

No, it's because you have a history of not arguing in good faith (just like you did here) and you post here a lot so arguing with you is like wrestling with a boar in the mud. The boar loves the mud but I don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 01:13 PM
1

That's only true of the younger cohorts.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 01:08 PM
5

The empowerment of women in the workplace can take the form of discriminatory hiring/promoting practices that disadvantage men.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 01:08 PM
1

Most men can't physically protect you from men with predatory behaviour. A man with a gun can (in the US at least), but you might as well get the gun yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 01:03 PM
3

Narrator: "they never put tiktok down"
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 12:26 PM
2

"People who already have established healthy relationships with the other sex might be more resistant to the gender wars thing" Definitely, though I still care because it's going to affect my kids "The gender wars thing on social media. " It isn't, unfortunately. My wife just told me just a couple days ago that she's fed up with the men bashing during breaks at her workplace. She works in a pediatric ward so the majority of staff are women.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 12:25 PM
2

Yes some women have rape fantasies. That doesn't mean they want these fantasies to happen in real life, that's actually how many fantasies work. Second, the amount of girls who wear mini skirts to go party is orders of magnitude bigger than that of women with rape fantasies. In any case, an outfit is never a mitigating circumstance and if you really think this way, seek help.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 12:01 PM
–

Just noticed you were the OP, my bad for engaging with one of your posts
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 11:50 AM
–

The fewer dates you get the more pressure you feel to make the dates you do get, work. Sure going Dutch is an option, but do you really want to risk making the one match you got this month drop?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 09:44 AM
2

I'm not sure it's misandry. As least in my case I don't hate men as a group or myself for being a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 09:13 AM
2

And that justifies/mitigates rape in your opinion?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 08:35 AM
1

No it's not. WTF.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 08:29 AM
3

"men can't control themselves around immodestly dressed women" Some men do interpret this is a signal of sexual availability and promiscuity but it's heavily influenced by culture/education/IQ.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 08:29 AM
1

Of course there are pleeeeenty of mean who love the idea of giving up control there are billions of men on Earth. %-wise they're still a minority.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 08:10 AM
2

Maybe I misinterpreted what you meant by "It's not, If they had sex they are in each other's league and the relationship just didn't work out."
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 07:43 AM
1

Fwiw I think both men and women owe it to their partner to stay fit.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 07:38 AM
2

You write this as if women are never looking for sex for the sake of sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/26 03:56 PM
2

Is it "many", or the ones who have options?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/26 03:54 PM
2

"If they had sex they are in each other's league" Both men and women have different leagues: the friendship league, the "one night stand" league and the relationship league. Men are willing to downgrade their expectations on looks for a one night stand. Women are willing to ignore a guy's lack of potential as a reliable partner you can start a family with. Usually they close this league once they hit 30.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/26 03:52 PM
2

"women do not understand other people feelings" What? Women have evolved to be better attuned to other people's feeling because their survival depended on it. They score better then men on facial emotion recognition for instance. That they decide that the feelings they perceive in other people (especially men) are not valid is a different matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/26 03:40 PM
5

The other contradiction is that in the feminist view of the world "women are free to do whatever they please and sleep with as many men as they want" but at the same time men are supposed to behave as if the women they go on dates with are looking for a relationship except if stated otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/26 03:36 PM
2

I think the vulnerability thing is a misinterpretation on the part of men. Women don't want a man full of doubts and insecurities. That makes their brain switch to empathy and mothering and she can't have sex with you if she's your mom. They want a rock they can rely on. What they mean when they say vulnerable is a guy who's not a psychopath and can show emotions when these emotions are warranted (= caused by something very important to them like a wedding, birth, first day of school of your kid…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/26 03:31 PM
1

They're not on trial in the same way/extent. It's the same dynamic as in a job interview. In theory the applicant is also evaluating if the employer is a good fit but he also needs to eat and both parties know it. Depending on the profile, position and state of the job market, the dynamic might be more in favour of the applicant but it's rarely the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/26 03:09 PM
1

No it won't, women are perceived to be the weaker gender. Only the weak are seen as needing protection. The strong need to pull themselves by their bootstraps.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/26 01:22 PM
3

"It just happened naturally" no it didn't lol. There was a civil war about this in the US, the English government enforced the ban on slavery at gunpoint across the world's oceans and it took the guilty conscience of the holocaust for Europeans to experience post nut genocide clarity and mellow the f*ck down. Not to mention the anti-racist stance of most media since at least the 90s.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/26 01:18 PM
1

I need the gimp mask to come though.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 09:51 AM
0

It's different because most men are not second-hand car sellers so it's easy to take the buyers side.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 09:33 AM
1

I like the analogy. The lack of empathy stems from the fact that when women tell about bad experiences men will tend to think of obvious bad choices like Ferraris. "Yeah they look nice but everyone knows they're super unreliable, you should have gone for a Toyota (I'm the Toyota)". They've experienced dating apps as a man, seen the Tea app, the Are we dating the same guy groups on FB so it's hard for them to understand women also get scammed buying a mid-range car.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 09:30 AM
1

How would you go about filtering as a woman? I've thought about it because I want my daughters to be happy and I've come to the conclusion that it's not that easy at it seems at first glance. Like sure, you can easily run a first filter based on obvious signs but past that it's a game of Among us. No every cheater looks like a fuckboy, not every violent guy looks like a convict. There's also the guys who lead you on about marriage and kids for years and waste your fertile window, the guys who ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 09:17 AM
1

Mediocre is a subjective assessment of value and perception of what is mediocre can vary over time. The problem for this generation of guys is that the value of what the average dude brings to the table has massively dropped with the welfare state, women entering the work force and now graduating college at higher rates. For western women to experience the same loss of value, it would take the landing of a massive, female-only wave of migrants (or the advent of humanoid robots indistinguishable …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 08:46 AM
1

For the same reason a fisherman not pulling a single fish out of the water will start speculating about where all the fish go. 😃
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 08:33 AM
1

Like in every data set there will be a decent number of outliers but people with tattoos are more likely to have mental health issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 08:22 AM
1

"many men with tattoos will date women without tattoos" Is this true? I personnally don't like tattoos and don't have any but I'd imagine having tattoos would make one more tolerant of one's own partner having some.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 08:15 AM
1

It's a bit ironic because you did choose to get involved with someone who was giving 'fuckboy' vibes. In the end it was not better selection, you were lucky he turned out to be a reliable guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 08:13 AM
2

"it’s much easier to be negative" It's like online reviews. People with a bad experience are much more likely to leave a review, happy people don't have the incentive to take the time to write something nice.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 08:02 AM
0

A lot do for financial reasons, but they argue they can't afford it at all when in fact they don't want to take the standard of living downgrade.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 07:49 AM
2

You're right, but oftentimes people who think there's no right to reproduction/love/intimacy will feel differently about other forms of "basic" human needs. They'll argue there's a right to food/shelter/safety but all of these things actually require other people to give their time (via extra work hours to pay taxes), the most precious thing humans have. Yes, it would be cruel not to give people a safety net, but the same can be argued about reproduction/love/intimacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 02:25 PM
1

There’s a lot of dubious stuff in the red pill universe no doubt but the set of principles can be applied to married life too, as a matter of fact there’s a whole sub dedicated to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 12:32 PM
–

At least the last sentence can’t be denied. A society that is below replacement rate over a long enough period of time will get replaced by another society that doesn’t see child rearing as a cold cost/benefit analysis. Either there’s a change of mindset in western women or the west will disappear. You and I will be gone by then but if you have kids this should worry you. I sure don’t want my granddaughters/great granddaughters to live in what comes after the west.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 10:16 AM
16

Whataboutism is in fact not a good conversation starter
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/26 07:19 PM
5

There are shitty people in every group but they’re probably over represented in the passport bro demographic
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/26 07:15 PM
2

Lovely
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/26 07:08 PM
1

« For women casual sex is having lots of guys you’re not attracted to wanting casual sex” Except this premise is wrong because it’s not just guys you’re not attracted to, that’s actually the biggest gripe average men have with dating apps. Their “natural” pool of average women is being harvested by guys with higher SMV. Without dating apps, top guys don’t bother with average women because the (effort+risk)/reward ratio of chatting them up is not worth it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 11:35 AM
6

In a way yes but they’re still completely different. In a relationship access to financial resources is an always on kind of thing, access to sex is conditional (and rightly so).
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 05:47 AM
–

The content creators do this for a reason: there is an audience for this kind of content.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 05:37 AM
–

Some do for sure but there’s a shortage of guys who tick like this, hence the videos of women complaining about not finding a decent guy despite “having their shit together, having a good job, making x amount of money per year, owning their flat”.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 05:33 AM
–

Reading your answer you probably fall into the toxic category. My wife has a very developed sense for inappropriate humor and we never make each other the butt of our jokes (let alone joke about personal traumas).
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 05:29 AM
1

You’re misrepresenting the RP claim. The fact women are wired to prefer mating with the top deciles of men doesn’t mean they all got to throughout history. If you want better survival odds it makes sense to have a partner you can depend upon, even if it means settling. Same if you want a family. What we’ve been seeing in the last 15 years is a revealing of preferences. Western women have gained financial independence and reproductive control so the effect of these constraints on their tendency t…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 05:14 AM
–

I didn't mention RP men. Top men in that context = "high value" men, aka men worth marrying from the POV of a girl who (thinks she) is "high-value".
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 08:03 PM
–

I'm answering to the comment above mine, not OP's. To your point, I believe OP is right and it's not in contradiction with what I wrote, but this hinges on the interpretation of a "man's personality". They're not attracted to the "toxic" aspects of masculinity (hyper competitiveness, aggressiveness, disagreeability, spitting, etc.), most of them aren't into tomboys either and prefer a girl who's feminine in her appearance . The part of a man's personality they like is what they seek in their mal…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 07:21 PM
1

Well yes. For starters, getting into red pill content in the first place stems from a lack of success that can be explained by a deficit in rizz and/or looks department. As you said red pill stuff works but there's a world between knowing the theory and applying them successfully in real life. Kind of like you can't learn how to swim by watching swimming tips videos.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 06:33 PM
–

They don't necessarily think men want very dominating women, but US women certainly seem to hold the belief that men are after girls killing it in their career. This is what they're looking for in men so they assume men must be looking for the same. Poor theory of mind when it comes to the opposite sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 06:28 PM
–

This type of content is geared towards a particular type of audience: women who want to get top men to commit to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 06:21 PM
3

You analogy doesn't work either because you can dance, sing and make art alone and these activities are hobbies, not a primal need encoded in everyone's DNA.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 06:37 PM
7

That's really easy to define, though median would be a better indicator
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 03:07 PM
1

Chalant, non chalant, whatever floats your boat man
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 05:03 PM
-2

What if the women depicted is your wife and she's on board with it?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 04:15 PM
3

Bread and circuses was not about keeping normal men down, it was about distracting the plebs (men and women) from their financial woes so they don't riot/revolt. Modern entertainment is different in the sense that it's not made to keep people from revolting, it's made to make money. Yes it ends up distracting people from their less-than-ideal lives but it was not a top down decision from elite men who met in secret.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 09:19 AM
11

There isn't a grand conspiracy from elite men to keep normal men down. They don't think about us at all. The reasons are more simple: women moving into middle management is good for the state (tax revenue) and employers (downward pressure on wages and women indexing higher on conscientiousness on average). If anything elite men have an incentive not to keep normal men down because a large proportion of disenfranchised men usually leads to social unrest which is bad for capital markets, hence the…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 09:01 AM
1

Do you count the pre shower poop + mindless scrolling while sitting on the throne in these 45 minutes? If not then it’s long, can’t be good for your skin
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 07:48 PM
0

„Off all time“ sounds a bit exaggerated. <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 06:03 PM
1

Just because you don’t like to follow doesn’t mean natural leaders don’t exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 10:02 PM
1

I think your definition of dominant is alpha male (confident, charismatic, commands respect naturally). A man a modern, educated woman would deem worthy to follow. In other words, a top 0.1% guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 09:54 PM
1

I don’t think it’s contradictory, men and women are similar in a sense that they want to feel valued and be the type of person you break your rules for. „This gal always made guys wait for months but she’s sleeping with me right away?“ -> she’s really into me (more into me than all the other guys) and I feel like a stud. „This guy only has flings and has never committed to any relationship before but he’s willing to wait a whole year to really get to know me?“ -> He really likes me (he likes me …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 05:20 AM
2

I don’t see it happening. Men crave intimacy with real women like they experience hunger. The reverse is not true.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 10:17 PM
–

It is before I let anyone move in and it is once again after they move out.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 09:37 PM
–

It’s not a collapse it‘s a slow enshittification since the GFC of 2008 but we‘re still better off living where we live in this day and age than any other time and place in the history of mankind. With 0,2% of decent men we’d be living in a mad max dystopia (or Uzbekistan‘s neighbouring countries under the reign of Timur in the 14th century).
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 09:35 PM
–

So you‘re saying I‘m not entitled to choosing who gets to enter my personal space? Take your time to answer, there are ramifications.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 09:12 PM
5

Agreed. Similarly, communists should move to communist countries.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 07:24 PM
1

Going by the passionate answers here it seems like they would.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 11:56 PM
1

How so? It’s a crucial piece of information to answer the question. I can understand preferring to run into a black bear than a man, but picking a brown/kodiak/grizzly bear over a man taken at random would be completely delulu.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 11:54 PM
1

You seriously don’t see why men would get offended? Of course it has to do with us we‘re men and women who answer bear are misandrists. Do you like misogynists? Didn’t think so.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 11:47 PM
1

What? Bear over woman? This makes no sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 11:39 PM
1

A clean quick death maybe. Rape is probably better than being eaten alive by a bear going straight for your internal organs because they’re the most nutrient dense.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 11:34 PM
1

Lions are not more dangerous than brown/kodiak/grizzly/polar bears. In both cases your survival chances are directly linked to the time elapsed since their last meal.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 11:30 PM
1

If anything it shows women are not familiar with the dietary habits of bears
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 11:25 PM
2

They’re created to keep users hooked and maximize shareholder value. There doesn’t need to be a grand conspiracy to keep people busy behind it. Plus the culture wars are not just on the internet, it’s at school and it‘s omnipresent in modern media production, often pushed by well meaning people who see themselves as brave. My 10 yo took notice without me ever mentioning anything and was starting to get pissed. It took some effort and a lot of explaining to deescalate the whole thing. My wife had…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 11:21 PM
1

1/500 would be 0,2% of good men, 99,8% assholes. Society as we know it would collapse if that were the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 11:00 PM
1

Statistically unlikely. I‘ve been in the shoes of the picker as a landlord in a large city and well, I almost felt bad about how picky I got to be and I still didn’t need to go through 500 applications to find tenants with impeccable credentials.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 10:55 PM
1

It’s not just the geography, Slavic people are a different breed. Serbs are even closer to the core of Western Europe but they’re not culturally western.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 10:39 PM
1

Lol there was a thread earlier today on this very sub about homophobia coming from women as a way to demean men
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 10:16 PM
1

It’s not prostitution because with SWs the sex is guaranteed.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 09:49 PM
1

It’s not necessarily financial, the extraction can take several forms. Men generally enjoy the company of women but the reverse is not true. Thus men need to justify their presence by providing value, else modern women prefer being single. To a man a woman‘s presence is the value.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 09:34 PM
–

I can’t imagine the depressing post nut clarity after taking one of these robots for a spin. I wish you well and hope you can find a partner who makes you happy.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 07:56 PM
1

The only way to achieve that would be to turn them into eunuchs
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 07:12 PM
3

This, the whole experience is the reward in and of itself. My wife has a very demanding job so I’ve been spending more time with the kids than her in the last couple of years and I love it. Not every second of course but there’s no activity that is more meaningful to me. I didn’t have a religious upbringing and I was a bit of an edgy nihilist as a young man. Children gave me a purpose and I let go of regret from past decisions because I realized any other decision would have meant not having the…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 07:05 PM
3

I'm not sure if enjoy is the right word, but for incels I can see how it would be more appealing than being forever alone. Yes it's deeply unethical and I wouldn't want my daughters to live in such a world, but desperation is not exactly a great state of mind to maintain a strong moral compass.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 01:26 PM
2

It's not a doomsday scenario, it's been how most of humanity has operated since time immemorial and it's still the case in countries with strongly patriarchal cultures (with beating added on top and justified by clerics in certain regions of the world).
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 01:05 PM
1

Judging by your reply I'm guessing you didn't watch the interview I'm talking about. Yes he did mention that female p0rnstars requested to shoot with him and that is the reason for his successful career. That being said, these requests are usually communicated to agents and/or production crews. The DMs he was getting were from women from all walks of life, "civilians" but also high-profile women athletes, non-adult entertainment celebrities, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 01:01 PM
2

Using gay as an insult is definitely a form of homophobia for sure, but it's also plain misandry because it's not directed at gays, it's used to make heterosexual men feel "less than" and dehumanize them, like comments about height, penis size, shitty working class jobs etc. Regarding negative views towards bi men, it's somewhat ironic because some of these women would probably get on their high horse if asked about their bodycount. Is it ok to sleep with lots of men or not? Honey pick a lane.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 09:11 AM
1

Very few men actually have what it takes to be players so the question is what % of men in their 20s actively prefer a committed relationship and what % don't have a choice?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 08:57 AM
3

They all want the same small pool of guys but they don't want to share. That's the reason for the tea app and all these "are we dating the same guy" FB groups. It's a female coded (reputational damage) attempt to coerce these very high value guys into committing.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 08:54 AM
1

Russia is not Western though
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 08:44 AM
2

This is true but we're talking Henry Cavill levels of handsomeness. I also watched an interview with Manuel Ferrara where he said he used to get DMs from women all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 08:43 AM
4

I don't think the biology part is true. The vast majority of men experience something akin to stage fright when it comes to approaching women. Humans living in very large groups of people who don't know each other is a fairly recent phenomenon.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 08:30 AM
11

The ratio definitely plays a role but it's the age group, too. Hormones are in overdrive, it's the first time living out of your parents' home, there's also a bit of a "what happens in Vegas stays in Vegas" aspect to it, and finally women know they have a somewhat limited time window to have fun, experiment and "get it out of their system" before the have to switch gears and look for a reliable and financially secure partner to start a family.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 08:11 AM
1

Many on Reddit will argue that this is also an inequality issue because poverty causes crime (I don't agree with this view because there are enough counter examples)
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 07:49 PM
0

Yes but a very small minority of men do most of the crime, especially violent crime. There's very solid data about this and the fact they get back on the street to commit more crime is due to a lenient criminal justice system. If you ask conservative men most of them will be happy to send violent criminals behind bars for a very long time.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 06:59 PM
4

Sure. The problem is when people start demanding that society is re-engineered around the self-perceived validity of their sufferings.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 06:52 PM
2

I really like the idea! My wife is not into games in general but quizzes could be dopamine inducing enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 02:36 PM
2

It's just common sense given most couples are not currently post-partum, battling cancer or working 80 hours week. I doubt any amount of data is going to satisfy you if you can't admit this.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 02:22 PM
1

I'm genuinely curious, what would these alternatives be?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 01:27 PM
3

Those are "force majeure" cases with a perfectly valid reason and usually an end in sight so no, not cruel. Most sexless marriages don't fall into one the above-mentioned cases though.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 01:24 PM
4

"try to date your spouse" That's something really key men need to understand if they want to maintain desire but it becomes tough once you have kids because the cost of a night out can ballon once you add 3-4 hours of baby sitting and most people don't live close to grand parents (+ many boomers are not that much into it).
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 12:11 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter