TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Theyus Archive

View 0 posts and 23 comments by Theyus on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
12

Creates mystery, bro.
/r/seduction23/02/13 08:08 AM
20

Hi, my name is _____.
/r/seduction23/02/13 03:49 AM
-3

Exactly. And, based on what he's given us, this is the conclusion we would draw. First of all: When in doubt, assume attraction. But, even if you were to ignore that, the evidence is overwhelmingly for the idea that she would have given him her number. I can point out to you every scenario that he gave us that proves it. I can even show some things that possibly disprove it. We draw conclusions from what we know. Unless you have something he gave us that says otherwise, what stronger bases do yo…
/r/seduction28/08/12 03:04 AM
-4

Edit: Actually, you're right. We should just go fuck ourselves when rejected. Op, don't listen to me. If a female shows any moderate disinterest, then she really doesn't like you and you should bail because she's just being polite and not trying to express how much disdain she has for you. Men are blunt because they want to cut the bullshit; Women are more subtle. You know how she'll get mad at you over something little and never tell you she's mad? You know how she drops hints to shit hoping yo…
/r/seduction28/08/12 02:52 AM
0

Clearly we could use more guys like you, so would you mind enlightening us as to why she didn't just say "I have a boyfriend," or (even better) "I can't/don't want to give you my number because I have a boyfriend"? Teach us, Occam.
/r/seduction28/08/12 01:37 AM
29

I see you have no clue what's going on here. Let me spell it out for you: If she wanted to politely decline she would have. If she wanted to not give him her number because she had a boyfriend, she would have said this as well. If she didn't want to give him her number for ____reason, she could have just said "Sorry, I have a boyfriend." When she said "But if I were single, I would give you my number," that's not being polite, that's not a direct refusal. That's her saying "I would like to give …
/r/seduction28/08/12 01:09 AM
0

It might also just not have detail, but I'm going to agree. There's something going on here that we're not SEEING and he's not SAYING, and that usually means physical aesthetics.
/r/seduction01/07/12 05:00 PM
9

"Forced her to experience what it's like being a friend." Beautiful frame.
/r/seduction20/06/12 07:33 PM
3

Not. At least, not in the way you're saying. They're probably friends, and you're a social violator for ignoring them; they're loyal to each other, not you. It would be under special cirucumstances/frames that would allow you to successfully talk to only one of them (especially the most attractive one) without blowing the set.
/r/seduction10/06/12 04:42 PM
3

"Hi, you guys seem fun, had to say hello!" You can't think of what to say because you're too busy trying to be indirect and secretive. You want to play with your balls to the wall? Be direct. The above statement is a good start. You're a guy approaching a group of three women with no man in a casino, completely unprovoked; do you think they're not going to "get" what you're doing? (Especially at your level) Just be direct. "Hi, you guys seem _____, had to come say hello!" If you get rejected, od…
/r/seduction10/06/12 04:40 PM
3

Getting in shape may help you be more confident and may get you opened on occasion, but it's no magic bullet. Stop trying to get your exes back. As soon as you need advice to get a specific person back, you've lost them forever. I'm assuming you meant to say you've been friendzoned. You want to break out of the friendzone? Make a move. A sexual move. Otherwise, enjoy your bff.
/r/seduction07/04/12 07:12 PM
1

Cool story bro.
/r/seduction07/04/12 07:10 PM
19

It can really help noobies. Understand, some of the audience can't understand "sit more confidently and take up more space." I spent a long time noticing and overthinking my posture and mannerisms before I got to the point where things flowed naturally.
/r/seduction05/04/12 01:32 AM
8

Not saying I agree with this guy's post, but your analogy is really bad.
/r/seduction04/04/12 06:26 AM
3

No body is perfect, but if it's good enough, then nothing you do can destroy it.
/r/seduction04/04/12 02:06 AM
9

Here's my theory, and you're welcome to disagree: If the relationship is perfect, then there is absolutely nothing you can do. Seriously. BF destroyers, gaming, attraction, doesn't matter. A stable-minded chick in a quality relationship can't be stolen. However, someone looking for prospects or able to be shaken is in a relationship that isn't already stable. That being said, I wouldn't trust a female that I could get from her Boy. Edit: additionally, you can use this for incredibly good work. W…
/r/seduction04/04/12 01:36 AM
1

We're agreeing my friend. :P It's more for the noob/intermediates that take things literally and don't distinguish facts. I might be preaching to the choir on seddit, but there is a chunk of the community that views every single connection to one female as oneitis that should be resisted. I believe we're on the same page, and again, I'm probably preaching to the choir.
/r/seduction03/04/12 09:16 PM
5

Nah, I get that. That kind of mentality is healthy and will keep things into perspective. However, it seems the community associates any pursuit of one woman as a bad thing. Consider this: You can get 10 women a night that would be solid LTRs (winning some and losing some), but there is one woman that clicks with you and resonates with you in a way that only screening would show. She blows through your screening, is attractive to all your standards, and you have great chemistry. But, she doesn't…
/r/seduction03/04/12 05:02 PM
7

Permit me this diatribe: I understand the concept of oneitis, and in my early years, I tried to avoid it. Something nagged at me; why would it be considered bad? The community will say that you should have abundance mentality, and be outcome dependent, that you should be able to shake off any woman and understand they're replaceable. And, I'll allow these thoughts in certain circumstances. However, the idea that we should not be upset when we lose a quality woman is just asinine. "Abundance ment…
/r/seduction03/04/12 03:52 PM
4

For real. You hear about it like an urban legend, but when it happens...
/r/seduction29/03/12 05:24 AM
2

Agreed. I'm a believer that anything can be pulled off with the right tonality or what-not, but this is laying it on a bit thick and slimy. The second one is fairly circumstantial, but that first one is just...much. Could you pull it off? Sure. Right place, time, and vibe, you could do it. But, beyond that...
/r/seduction15/03/12 05:41 AM
3

It should be understood that different techniques will select for different girls. Mystery even said he dresses the way he does because it attracts the girls he wants.
/r/seduction03/03/12 09:05 PM
1

This. Getting phone numbers is just one step above opening. I can open a thousand girls, but if I don't close them, it means nothing.
/r/seduction19/01/11 04:57 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter