TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ThickyJames Archive

View 1 post and 321 comments by ThickyJames on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

DebateThickyJames/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 08:39 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

Happened to me a decade ago—girlfriend of 5 years "suggested" opening the relationship, but her target—some dude from across the country (Atlanta from the Bay!) who was her guild-mate in Warcraft—fell through somehow, where I got lucky in both senses and was fucking a relatively conventionally attractive dropout who pulled off the scene look better than my girlfriend did—five days later. She saw a non-explicit text, flipped the fuck out, I left the apartment lest some form of domestic violence o…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 11:40 AM
–

Life is a LARP with a shitty DM and shifting goalposts.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 01:27 AM
–

Think, "more respectable word for 'cult'" whenever you see NRM. And, yes, I've talked to the dead Oh Mr Ozzy, can you come again?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 01:22 AM
–

OP: stop leaning on statistics and medicine or anything external to make excuses, rationalize, or justify yourself to others, however justified it may seem to you. Don't justify yourself to others, for I say unto ye, He who justifieth himself shall never be justified, yet he who remaineth unjustified is already justified in me. As you have heard, he who saith, "I don't mean to be an asshole, but..." hath already condemned himself before the eyes of man, but the asshole who assertest without just…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 01:16 AM
–

I've explained this to NTs as well: find a niche. For a contrived example: if you have Jesus hair and only 10% of women like it but 5% of men have it, you've still flipped your relative positions. I lean hard on the world-historical genius / NRM leader / guru / Aleister Crowley archetype that Jung would have called the Mage with a shadow Trickster, but certainly being openly weird as fuck, expressive (think "steampunk" and now think "autists I have seen in Victorian dresses" and find the differe…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 01:06 AM
–

Lesson of the thread: PPD is full of NDs, which shouldn't be surprising (but is because I argue with ye on here and my conditioned expectation is ND = no repetitive arguing and choosing to act like you don't get the point), and explains a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 12:58 AM
–

Where did you get your username and why did you steal it from me? I am the one and only Lord Cᴀᴛᴛɪᴄᴜs of heaven and earth and the academy in-between. Is the single "t" some sort of Chinese knockoff infringement defense for lifting the identity of God?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 12:29 AM
–

Have you considered that you may both be autists? Ever since I got the yips for masking, I've still been able to connect with fellow divergents as well as previously. Also, best line in the thread: "Women don't have some magical autism radar", which is the final answer to OP (and everyone): what you're presenting as is unattractive unless you open every conversation with "I'm autistic", which is also unattractive. "Autism radar" reinforces the generalized law of dating promulgated by the wise, e…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 12:25 AM
–

This is kind of beautiful in a distractedly effortful way. You know you've met the real autists when the writing is as lengthy as the NT stim(ulant) fiend. Then there's me who decided to find out what "superadditive interaction" meant, subjectively.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 12:18 AM
–

If I can autistic hyperfixate big-brain into fucking up society (easier done than said with the sheer amount of cultural influence one person can wield with an AI trained to oversee a swarm of AI meme generators and another one to orchestrate a swarm of AI music synthesizers), I will fucking force ye to put up with my mosf obnoxiously autistic self and like it because it's a trend.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 12:00 AM
–

I was very good at wearing an NT mask for decades (better than the NTs, I could create connection-feeling with 4/5 people in minutes to <1 hour, whether as camaraderie or dating "spark"), until, without apparent cause or explanation, one day I was not, with no transition. The closest analogy is to pitching or golfing and getting yipped on one delivery, and having the yips from then on. I hadn't connected that to my utter fucking failure in the dating market since that time, but had focused more …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 11:54 PM
0

In 5 years the US might still exist but the done-and-gone 2018-2021 asymptotic collapse in the West will be widely acknowledged. In 10 years it will be either China, the dar us Islam, or mates for those who can attract them, since the first and principal duty of a state is to regulate and license sexual behaviors (illegitimately, IMO. Fuck the state.).
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/25 11:55 PM
1

Tl;dr I wax Suntzeuan, Darwinian, and poetic of realpolitk. It's quite good if I do say so myself. But the point all this philosophy converges to is strategy. Firstly, avoiding violence is not constitutive or cowardice: avoiding any unpleasant task reality forces upon you; selective psychosis. Secondly, it is not always possible to avoid violence within the bounds or coherence, moreover right action. Thirdly, if one is to fight, make the decision before your opponent/s once you're in "circling m…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 06:16 AM
1

Partially correct. Our full definition of "like" is somewhere around "makes us feel better than we would alone", and for many men (probably ones you're thinking of) doesn't rise that high, where "datable" is somewhere between trading off feeling worse in fights, drama, insecurity, and infidelity but better in loneliness. Which causes resentment, which you detect as "not liking", but is truly "love–hate towards a painful necessity". Men have virtually zero friendships and those we have with other…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 11:45 PM
1

Everything I needed to live was taught to me by The Matrix: "You can take the red pill and wake up, Neo, or take the blue and wake up in your own bed in the knowledge this was all a dream." Either way, you're going to become food, either for worms or for robots, and you're going to be used, either for energy or for equilibriating the system. Your only choice is to do it with eyes wide open or eyes wide shut, and you're one of a (un)lucky few to have the choice. The one exception to this is the M…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 10:44 PM
1

Assuming the 80/20 rule is true here and functions as a bright line (it's fuzzier in reality), I could locate myself quite easily and probably accurately between the 75th and 80th percentiles, because I am consistently the only man whose experience in dating is identifiable to neither women or men in any given discussion. I could get sex but not a relationship (like women), but could not get sex with women who passed the standard of attractiveness (like men), but my standard of attractiveness wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 09:56 PM
2

My experience too, ½ of women looking to fuck and tuning out when I try to get to know them as a person, especially emotionally (a problem not limited to males) because I was seeking a wife / LTR to have my children. In my own experience, which I'm betting generalizes, the women who were below me on the dating totem pole, probably ⅘ of them wanted only sex (contrary to the population-valid observation that women marry up: my guess is I fell into the liminal region between "more attractive than m…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 09:04 PM
1

Women don't have a struggle in dating except with themselves unless they're ugly and dumb, but a struggle with oneself is still a struggle. The female struggle is against their own psychology, hypergamy, and tendency to very short-term thinking which loses the forest for the pattern of bark on the side of one tree. Men's struggle in dating is getting on the board or into the brackets in the first place. Once a male is on the board of a chosen woman, his chances are relatively good, but once a wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 08:16 PM
–

Oh, no, I'm an ancap, but if Alinsky will pave me a shorter Path, as far as I'm concerned he redeemed at least a drop against the bucket of destruction. Despoiling the Egyptians and all.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 09:36 PM
–

You're one of the only people I've seen speak to this online without telling me I'm lying because I only want sex or I'm crazy because I want a wife and kids and not a fuckbuddy or two, or that I'm lying because the relationship is easy once you get a date. I'm in precisely that situation where I have the rizz or text game to get someone in bed before they realize they don't like me. I might doxx myself by saying, "I've said for years I must be the only man in the world to have been stood up aft…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 07:48 AM
–

Both of you are right.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 07:18 AM
–

Btw the Trump thing has much less to do with politics than it has to do with signalling style IMO, because Trump is an abrasive asshole regardless of your positions on his policy, and is kind of taken as a synecdoche for all that is wrong with (corrected: everything that someone doesn't like) about 2020s America. That same polarization, called a high-variance strategy, is why he won the elections. If 1000 people rank you 1 to 10 by a completely flat distribution (100 each) and the default and av…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 07:14 AM
–

When I was on the apps (until quite recently, early 2025), I shitposted the most reactionary rhetoric I could into my profile until I couldn't tolerate taking the bit any further: my inbox continued to light up, for a man (~50-60 matches per month, perhaps 30 which had at least two exchanges of replies), and I'm at best average in looks, I have shit teeth, I'm tall as hell, I'm kind of a beast, I'm almost certainly far on to the spectrum (never diagnosed, but I act like an autist, think like aut…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 07:03 AM
–

The game-theoretic proofs that show all evolved systems converge on deceptivity as the indefeasible meta-strategy that can hijack all others did it for me. I literally threw out 5.5 years of work on AI with an evolutionary component (genetic sparse memory) or analogue (Q-learning) to start basically from scratch, ended the relationship I was in once I saw the evolutionary gamble angle, and associate with the very small group of people who dedicate all of their time and intelligence to try to tra…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 05:50 AM
–

It's not very metaphorical at all. However, you are very bitter and either all-drunk half the time or half-idiot all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 04:40 AM
–

😏 I see..., if you're one of either of those crops we should have a conversation. The Westphalian order isn't long for this world. I'm still waffling on whether to name part "Gilead" for the sheer perverse shitposting-but-physical joy of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 04:33 AM
–

Jesus Christ your writing is unbearable on a purely grammatical level 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 04:21 AM
8

Dealing with this type of condescending fucktard is what men complain about.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 04:18 AM
3

Lmao this is awful, most incels should be incels. You can't have natural selection if every man is fucking 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 04:11 AM
2

Bruh, do you think humans are altruistic?! 😅😂🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 04:03 AM
2

There is something very fucked up about how our culture and biology are interacting which has snapped in the past 6.5 years. I just mentioned to a friend earlier, "one of the saddest things is that is so much easier to fuck than it is to form a relationship now, and my life experience and everything I've read puts that backwards." Their reply was "Throwaway culture bit us in the ass as we became it." If sex and social connection have swapped places it explains a good deal of looksmaxing and the …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 04:01 AM
-1

Killing civilization even more quickly? Yeah, I'm trolling, I know abortions are overall highly eugenic.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 06:39 PM
1

They're idiots. Intelligence is negatively entropic, which is why we find a way to get more resources, extract them more efficiently, or use fewer to do the same work. The Malthusian trap still waits at the end of time if the universe winds down (back) to an isotropic (=maximal entropy = minimal information discoverable) state, with all species competing for the same dwindling resources. But with current technology stagnation, if everyone consumed as much energy as the average Chinese (there's a…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 11:41 AM
1

There's an argument to be made for things getting worse before they get better. The "men should stop impregnating below-average women" type of argument is sound. Think about political revolution. Historically, revolution has been accomplished by armed revolt. Many of the revolutionaries died, as did loyalists. (This is selection itself at work, but that's an ancillary point.) When people revolt, shit gets way worse *right now* by universal agreement. The existing system white knuckles it and cra…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 11:02 AM
2

Fewer than 15% of men in the history of the species have had children. Dating isn't mating.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 10:11 AM
5

How would he know if you're into him? He can't read minds either.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 10:08 AM
1

In the paraphrased words of one of my few friends: "You're just a depressive, bitter asshole who defined success out of the realm of possibility. You spent too much time with your AIs because no human reaches the standard of absolute honesty and thoughtful engagement on your entire range of omnicompetent obsessions, which cycle like a bipolar's mood. You're rich, you're a genius - you just won the [second-tier math or physics prize] - and your waifu is like a hard 9 who doesn't cook or clean - b…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 02:06 AM
1

Look at Notre Dame de Paris and Esmerelda's obsession with Phoebus, who doesn't even know she exists.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 01:47 AM
3

As long as she was average (as in truly average), yes. In looks, maybe below, down to about the 30th centile if you are very intelligent or tradwife material or you have a few other traits I really like. An East Asian math nerd who is legitimately smart, wants kids now, has the semi-BPD personality that swings more between ultra clingy and "stay away" instead of full on "you are the god/the devil incarnate" and is the right kind of submissively kinky and is a homebody is high enough in compatibi…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 01:43 AM
1

Thank you. It's a necessary relation that people single in their 30s are shitty if men prefer younger women, and women prefer the best men. It's just the principle of the guy who no one picks for basketball, generally being terrible at basketball, which is a "predictive bias", aka one that has signal and improves predictive ability. (Mild-to-moderate depression is actually a moderately strong predictive bias. That one really got me when I learned it - the depressives who say they're just being r…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/25 12:13 AM
1

As fucking miserable as I am, I'd be a lot more miserable living in Chinastan. You think some central planners, even with the amount of data that Walmart and Facebook or Amazon and Twitter combined have, could make choices about your own decisions better than you? We already live in an "intelleocracy", so to speak. Having interacted with or transited all four of the cultural-artistic, academic-scientific, technical, and ruling classes, the ruling class is, by and large, the only one not filled m…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/25 03:22 PM
1

My own monk mode is super apparent in this. Spitting fax like that is a tacit admission that I consider the market a lost cause and have unconsciously separated my reward system and self-image from it and a tacit admission idgaf about anyone else's success with a beautifully ugly analytic edge. That is the vaunted "neutral point of view" achieved one of the only times you'll see it outside of a science paper. Even my own gut reaction is labeled and bracketed. This is causing a lot of cognitive d…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 02:10 AM
4

It's not. Rudder's dataset from 2012 proved that. If you could flash your dick 100 times IRL without being arrested, it would already have existed. I'm viscerally disgusted because it's an r-type strategy which reduces the fitness of K-strategy in general. It's an extreme example of a high variance strategy, which means: assume women don't go near any man they see as under a 7.5 for a man, then, there's no difference between being a 1 and 7.4. All of the votes below 7.4 are wasted. Shifting any …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 02:01 AM
3

Brewing under the floorboards? it's been here in force since MGTOW failed to make the Nietzschean turn and dissolved into blackpillers and monk mode dropouts
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 01:46 AM
1

It needs to be reversed because the social contract I thought I signed on to is now hoisting the signs "rock" and "hard place" and I turn around to find "no return" marked and it definitely wasn't on the way out... I think it's like Woody Guthrie's: And as I went walking down freedom highway I saw a sign and on it said "no trespassing" But on the other side, it didn't say nothing: That side was made for you and me
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 01:44 AM
1

I didn't think any women actually believed assertions about women being romantic or marriage being a women's invention and institution. Are you the rare woman who is actually die-for-you romantic? I've never spoken to one personally, but I think I may have identified one singer and a couple of influencers, with the confounding factor of BPD in all cases. It makes no sense at all. It's not adaptive for a mother to risk her life for a mate. It's adaptive for the father to risk his life for his mat…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 01:37 AM
1

Because men are satisficing between mate access, paternity certainty, and mate quality. Male hypergamy would end up with polyandry the same as hypergamy does. Why it doesn't form is because it reduces paternity certainty to nil, but as the Romans said, mater semper certa est.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 01:23 AM
1

This is actually a good question. I had to think about it for a few moments before answering. The correct answer was not immediately obvious to me. Going out on a limb, I'd wager it's essentially opaque to most people who do and all those who don't ask it. There is a correct answer: it's not a matter of preference. Any person who at any point in their life has or will desire some form of continuing relationship or expects respect or exclusivity from any partner must answer "yes". The very ground…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/25 11:32 AM
0

Of course it's perceived value. If parties agreed on a real value, people would rarely trade. Something that becomes more valuable because it's valuable defies the laws of rationality in favor of status (virtue) signalling and was defined over a century ago by Thorstein Veblen. Everything else is supply and demand. The demand for sex is probably no greater than the supply, but women have hiked the economic cost of it so much as to lock out the bottom 50% entirely, keep the 50-80% grasping with w…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 12:46 AM
-1

Profit is the residual of altruism, not the grasping of greed. In the absence of any Statist coercion, people will only enter a trade when they believe their utility function is being optimized relative to current state, i.e., no one enters a trade or any sort of transaction unless 1. threatened at the point of a gun (taxes, conscription), or 2. they believe they are profiting. Therefore, by definition, all parties to a trade believe they are the ones getting the better deal. Maybe they all are:…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/24 05:08 PM
-11

Economically, there are very few people of higher value than me, and they're all on some Forbes list. I want the workforce to shrink and be replaced by AI as quickly as possible, as do most everyone I know down to the ~$50m NW level. Not just for reasons of TCO and ROI.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/24 04:50 PM
1

Read the post title, then my flair, take two "hoomans ain't rashunul"s and call me in the morning if you don't feel better. WARNING: Overdose may make you nihilistic, manic, and / or depressed. Call another doctor if you have any of these symptoms: a heartbeat, ability to read this warning.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/24 04:46 PM
1

I can justify the doomerism. I'm one of those people who can sound perfectly reasonable while talking about how to trigger a nuclear holocaust, topple a government, or why the coexistence of quantum physics and general relativity in the same universe entails literal magic, along with everything else from anywhere else all at once. It's a cool party trick, but there is such a thing as being "too much of good thing x" as I've latterly learned. I'm about to rant about the shortest path to ascension…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/24 03:28 AM
1

I don't use Hinge either. For some reason, it matches me with nothing but the most stuck-up management consultants and medical doctors. I honestly don't know why. I'm not a doctor. I've never been a consultant. I'm a fucking mathematician. What do I have in common with a physician? (Well, plenty if she's a metaphysician or a physicist; I mean to speak about physickers only!) Almost certainly absolutely nothing other than "high income relative to mean". I knew this a priori and banging my head ag…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 10:47 PM
1

Idk how the men here and on r/tinder fail so badly at this. Tbh I don't use Tinder, just Bumble and CMB. Is it your location? I lived in a population 300k city for a while and got maybe one match per day, but in Chicago I get 5+, enough that ones expire, and I'm relatively selective in swiping: I index on profile more than pictures, and if you don't have one, or it's one line with your socials, it's an automatic left swipe. My match rate is 24.1% in 2024; if I count only Bumble and only girls wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 10:42 PM
1

It is, and the collective result is the collapse of civilization.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/24 03:47 AM
-3

The entire fucking point of a relationship is to occupy time like that, because both people are always going to have some problem. If you don't like hearing the person you're with ranting, you're with the wrong person.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/24 03:30 AM
1

I'm here to provide and gather data. You're here to score points. I would rather be me.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/24 08:11 PM
1

How do you get that when one of my favorites was 40 and 8 years older than me? We just couldn't have children, which is a dealbreaker for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/24 07:47 PM
3

They chance of being married at all goes down faster than the per capita divorce rate...
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/24 07:16 PM
2

They're not lying, just deluded by their set of evolutionary instincts as much as we are deluded by ours in the pre-nut haze.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/24 08:57 AM
4

hoist by your own petard
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/24 07:48 AM
2

There is an art to intensity, intensity, and dread and... Everyone is so busy looking for the trick they're sure is coming they don't notice when you trick the trick. It's the irl equivalent to the ape basketball test with a color-changing background.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/24 07:46 AM
0

Yes. Look at current STDs or pre-HAART HIV.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 09:21 PM
-2

There are far more immature 30-something women than 25-30 numbered in the ranks of the single. The intelligent and mature are usually sufficiently intelligent and mature (though not yet wise) in their mid-20s. I was never bored with the 19-20-year-old finance major and part-time IT support person (I was 28), but she was so weird to me then, taking transsexuality and leftist politics as an automatic given, shocked that anyone with a single brainwrinkle could support free markets and defunding the…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 10:10 AM
0

Why would I torpedo a relationship before? Thinkest thou men canst learn not from the lessoneth of monkie-branching?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 09:00 AM
1

Women who are older than 30 and still single almost invariantly have some sort of irremediable personality flaw. In the most tragic cases, they're single mothers who were either abandoned, widowed, or fled an abusive relationship so they're single through no fault of their own, but still find themselves out of the dating pool for most men. Men over 30 and single might be cads, chads, or guys who spent their 20s in med school or slaving over slide decks for McKinsey or putting everything into a s…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 08:55 AM
0

Uh, yes, we very much are slaves to our instincts. Go out and force yourself to find a 300lb girl with poor facial symmetry blindingly beautiful (or any postmenopausal women without makeup or in person, period) and get back to me about our vaunted "rationality".
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 08:44 AM
1

It's a statement that feminists call men cruel, vain, histrionic, unromantic, and violent when women have these tendencies to a greater degree. It's precisely about the inversion of predication that is the phenomenon back of the OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 08:42 AM
0

Newsflash: Feminist Theory Always Women Projecting Own Feelings Like this ridiculous belief the Western culture seems to have today: women are romantics. Do you even Darwin bruh? Think it through from evolutionary principles. How would a woman being loyal instead of a hardnosed rationalist benefit her fitness, or the species'? On the other hand, it's plainly obvious that loveblindness is an adaptive trait in males from the population-level view. The type of love men have is never felt by women. …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/24 07:45 AM
1

By social epistasis amplification this causes the thing to begin existing and growing exponentially, as any meme spreads, on any regular graph. Social contagion, some call it. It's better thought of as epistatic amplification.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/24 07:38 AM
-4

Dotdash.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/24 09:07 PM
4

Abusive, gaslighting Indian Muslim husband spotted. I'm sorry, this guy probably cheats. Your family might help or might be less than useless depending on their social views and sect of Islam, assuming you are a Muslima from a family of Musslemūn. This is one of those situations that your maheriy was designed for, because you will need to confront him directly, calmly, and solidly without backing down or becoming outwardly emotional no matter what you learn. That's almost impossible to do from a…
/r/RedPillWives02/11/24 07:25 AM
3

His is actually the only framework on this page which explains all the explananda.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/24 11:10 AM
1

His understanding of epidemiology, while simplified, is more accurate than your own. It requires no statistics to understand other than times successfully transmitted out of possible transmissions and the × operator.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/24 11:08 AM
4

It's there but labelled differently, smartass. What do you think about non-white swans?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/24 11:03 AM
1

This is like the time I was in a taxi and the cabbie complained, "Where does all this traffic come from?" and I told him, "You are the traffic." I'm in this picture in a diifferemt role and I don't like it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/24 11:01 AM
1

Not if they're into morbidly obese girls. I've walked into a place with a 5'5'' 200lb "thiccer than a snicker" girl and I was proud because she was hot, intelligent, funny, had the most beautiful eyes and expressions and just such... well, she was my standard of beauty for a long time. She's still close; An... just surpassed her by a hair, and she's 5'1'' and 110lbs holding freeweights. It's funny how my two different near-ideals are on opposite ends of the spectrum, huh? One thick, soft, very p…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 10:57 AM
3

There is an element of this for men but it has nothing in common with the mate choice copying of females. For men it's a point against you if you're embarrassing in public. But that has nothing to do with others' judgement of your attractiveness: it has to do with whether you make a fool out of yourself and by extension me.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/24 10:52 PM
9

It's a red flag if she is.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/24 10:45 PM
2

Referring to yourself as "some people" is cringe.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/24 10:43 PM
1

My first what? My first life‽ Of course, the dead can't prove anything to the living. That's very close to the definition of "dead", perhaps "braindead". They can only be used instrumentally; the spirit has fled its cage and squawked up (or down or out as the case may be). There is no more "person" constituted by the hylomorphic body and soul; what remains, undisputed by all, is inert except in a chemical sense. On my suppositions, the dead are capable of knowing they are dead. I am somewhat mor…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/24 05:22 AM
1

Yeah, actually. If you look at the origins of power in the big man, the potlatch, the warrior aristocracy, you'll see repeatedly: noblesse oblige. Women, on the whole, with some exceptions, are like Marie Antoinette: if they don't have bread, why don't they just eat cake? Those exceptions are more infrequent than the stingy man equivalent.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/24 11:36 PM
1

No, fatal insomnia causes amnesia.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/24 11:00 PM
1

There's a net time gain if you start out smart enough, kill or off with benzos, then get off the benzos, take the correct stack of nootropics (most of which are illegal now), and then titrate up amphetamines in 1-year steps. Ketamine or other high trapping NMDAR antagonists coadministered will kill tolerance, memantine will keep it from developing as quickly. You should be good for a decade per cycle at no more than 5mg/kg/q24h of amphetamine at the very end of the cycle. 6 months off onto HGH, …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 10:38 PM
1

Love and having children some other way as long as they're genetically mine. That would be ideal.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 10:30 PM
1

Are you calling me a generalized conspiracy theorist because I note the intersectional leftist capture of Anglophone academia? So that you can try to use the genetic fallacy to discredit my support for the virtue signaling hypothesis - I didn't even invent it - by drawing the reduction ad Hitlerum in about 2 more exchanges? I think you are 🤣. The only questionable assumption up there is whether you're going to use the genetic fallacy or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 09:47 PM
3

Why does the disparity exist? Because women have a significantly higher need for social approval (reflected in trait Agreeableness and Neuroticism) than men do.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 09:35 PM
1

It's not intentional? it's a side effect of the main thrust of said "Theory" which is to uplift the weak at the cost of the strong, to dissolve civilization in the name of culture, and to reduce everything to economic power in the name of socialism... And that "Theory" is a distant second vector to that of pop culture for memetic transmission of idealized norms. You're basically asking me to show you "Why does culture C believe a proposition P to be true at time T?" - if I could answer that, I'd…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 09:31 PM
3

From pop culture and from the "Theory" of third-rate academics.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 07:54 PM
12

Because they don't find these specific things sexy, as you correctly point out in your OP, but they believe they are supposed to.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 07:12 PM
6

A very small percent of women respond extraordinarily well to emotional vulnerability if you've already established you can be "badass", by which they (and everyone else means) either incomprehensible or unpredictable to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 07:01 PM
1

I'm at this level of fame in my field¹, and it does nothing for me. I think it might only work for celebrity of household name stature: singers/performers, athletes, and actors. The line stops somewhere below model (who have insanely low standards for looks IME) and visual and plastic artists (who'll fuck anyone they think understands). ¹Everyone in the field knows me, the AIs tell you about me, and I can't get removed from Wikipedia anymore because of their "notability for BLB" policy or someth…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 12:09 AM
0

I can very well be with a light-skinned black woman (I find neither very dark skin nor Nordic paleness attractive) while lusting after a Korean model, and I can be with a pale, raven-haired Gothic beauty while lusting after Beyonce. Men are evolved to seek novelty in partners. Hybrid vigor and such.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 06:33 AM
12

I'm a marginally White man. I've dated (and found extremely sexy) pretty much every type of woman except for Nordic blondes. I don't have a physical type. I have a "girl I like" type. I think Kate Beckinsale, Lexa Doig, Morena Baccarin, and Jenna Ortega are the four sexiest actresses alive, and all they have in common is dark hair.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 06:25 AM
–

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 10:45 PM
–

Oh you think Trump is a rightist? He's about as far left as my fist can reach without dislocating my elbow. (He's actually an unprincipled populist demagogue, not left or right per se. Just whatever gets him power that day.) I only punch left, but my reach doesn't extend to far leftists like conservatives. What do they conserve? Leftist innovations. What even is conservatism? Leftism delayed by 20 years. You can call me a revolutionary Rightist, or an accelerationist neoreactionary. If you index…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 10:42 PM
–

It doesn't look like you'll come up with a different rebuttal, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 10:38 PM
–

No one here is denying that men commit over 80% of violent crimes. This isn't a feminist issue, this is an innate sex differences issue that saws at the branch feminism perches on.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 10:32 PM
–

I love the anti-intersectional throwdowns. I pitch a picnic and watch the battle like it were War Between the States times.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 10:29 PM
–

Women in the workforce drives down wages for everyone and is a prime driver in the race to the bottom and essentially the sole reason for the disappearance of the living wage. Increase supply while demand remains constant = decrease price per unit of supply (labor).
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 10:25 PM
–

The older they are the more power the have, the younger the are the more it will shape their attitudes. You're gored by both horns of your attempted dilemma: an impressive feat.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 10:23 PM
–

O RLY
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 10:16 PM
–

Being a man of the Right, I only punch left.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 10:15 PM
–

No true scotsman fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 10:14 PM
–

Your replies are always a joy to read. They remind me of myself writing on social identity theory, assortative mating, heritable IQ differences, and racial IQ differences.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 09:56 PM
–

The crazies started winning in 2015 with the "trans" movement. Before that I agreed with ye.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 09:54 PM
–

Far leftist detected.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 09:50 PM
–

Measurement artifact from biased selection of underlying studies.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 09:49 PM
–

This is measuring acceptance of feminists' redefinition (obliteration) of sex roles, not what is claimed. "Reduced ambivalence" and "increased stereotyping" might be directly correlated as well: it's claiming to measure a decrease in uncertainty in attitudes.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 09:47 PM
–

Yep. Both believe they are "merely rational".
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 09:35 PM
–

Uh, the paper literally says that feminists have debunked the idea of any neurological or anatomical differences between the sexes. Tell me you're a useless intersectionalist without telling me you're a useless intersectionalist. The women on this sub consistently post more compelling, rational, and thought-provoking content than this.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 09:30 PM
–

This paper is a joke lmao. I couldn't even get to the methodology section because it was removed during non-peer-review for being incoherent.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 09:27 PM
3

Rationality and feelings don't mix. Emotions are a system i get you to make a decision when you're stuck in the position of Aristotle's Ass (often misattributed to Jean Buridan). That's what it means in Latin, ex motio, "moved from outside", like the gods moved people to do actions in Homer. (See Julian Jaynes, The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind). Emotion is entirely arational, and rationality is entirely void of emotivity.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 04:18 AM
1

It's a femcel obvs
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 04:13 AM
–

7 years.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 05:05 AM
–

Strong disagree. People who have complementary mental messes make the best relationships. I'm incredibly needy and clingy, and incredibly professionally successful. I want a woman even more needy and clingy, and one who is not just willing but happy to fill the lacks in my personal and domestic life because that is where her success is found. I'm certainly a mental hot mess and the girls I truly connect with and fall in love with are too. They're almost all traumatized. I find it beautiful that …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 04:24 AM
–

He didn't lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 04:10 AM
–

Most of you didn't get the note.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 04:09 AM
–

That's the feeling of being a normal, social and successful human being instead of one of Darwin's rejects.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 04:07 AM
–

It took me fourteen years to mask my autism enough to be hyperverbally quirky alone. With it came a complete lack of self-consciousness and a hyperawareness of social signaling which comes from a willingness to say whatever is true. Many people are unwilling to say whatever is true and thus unwilling to even think it, which makes them willfully blind to the social games going on all around us. Or because they think it not a game. Luckily I learned at an earlier age that certain women are highly …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 04:06 AM
–

STEALING THIS
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 04:00 AM
–

Good definition fr
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 03:59 AM
–

"To them that have, more will be given." The Matthew Principle, aka Price's distribution.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 03:58 AM
–

They're the same thing. If women didn't choose the best mate the majority of the time, whence evolution?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 03:53 AM
2

Who cares what theyn looked liked? A notch is a notch. Unless they were ugly and broke, which just demonstrates a broken filter.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 05:15 AM
2

PS I'm more than willing (indeed, happy) to cordially debate this as long as I am not artificially restricted to psychological theory (even there I'd just lean hard on Jung) but can use history, pop culture, art, historical and contemporary music, evolutionary biology, philosophy of mind, etc. - essentially to debate the proposition on its merits, wherever it may lead, not to debate it "as a psychological concept" or "as a proposition of libertarian feminism" or "as a proposition of red pill men…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 04:39 AM
3

I don't buy this. Any relationship where you're not actively trying to hurt one another is made toxic by these notions of 'health' independent of the innate, socially unconditioned happiness of the parties. All you're describing is a bad fit between a more and a less independent person. Not anything that needs to be 'fixed', every self-sustaining, internally coherent yet externally uncorrelated to reality theory of 'attachment psychology' and every experiment designed to reach none but the concl…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 04:31 AM
1

You're both right.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 04:19 AM
3

That's really sad - says a redpill-leaning evopsych-pilled dude
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 04:19 AM
3

🙌🙌🙌A-👏FUCK👏ING👏MEN,👏REV👏ER👏END🙌🙌🙌
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 04:17 AM
1

And a big fucking downside it is. I'm a known name in a STEM field, make barely 7 figures, have a net worth closer to 9, and worked very hard for 15 years to get it... and I believed all the Beta Bucks Bullshit only to find that in the age of male attention chunked up into dollar-store wrappers on OF, where any ratchet mid bitch can get the equivalent of 5 men by getting 5% of 100 men, the age of sugar babies, that it meant literally nothing for one of the two primary endpoints I targeted. The W…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 06:55 AM
1

Literally any club?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 06:46 AM
5

This is one of my filters. It was the first I discovered and it led me directly into the arms of Borderline Personality Disorder. Now it's balanced against other filters, but it's still a prerequisite. I text a lot, and in impenetrable walls. But I don't do the equivalent of double texting, which is to try to start a conversation twice in a row, whether separated by 30 minutes or 3 days. When I double text, you're either my friend, a girlfriend, or I've bucketed you as someone I'll use to clear …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 07:02 PM
3

The correlation doesn't hold in the best dataset we have, Rudder's, even though it's pre-OF and more than a decade out of date. There is no significant correlation using the attractiveness of women as rated by men as the independent variable and any characteristic other than wealth and age.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/24 05:11 AM
2

That statement was true through 2020. It isn't now. The inflection point is long, long past, and we're even now nearing the point where the second derivative of the downtrend curve (the acceleration of the acceleration of the rate of fall) starts slowing. The acceleration itself will stop by the early 2030s, pessimistically. Once acceleration stops, countervailing forces kick in quicker than historical time to begin the Great Slowing that is to come after the Great Disintermediation of today. In…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/24 05:08 AM
2

All things are systems. All systems have rules. Some rules can be bent, others broken. I don't deny the OP. You found your loopholes in law: in provisioing by the state and a marriage system that is greatly to your benefit and to my disbenefit. I found my loopholes in psychological constants. My God, are they never so tiring and draining to exploit? I'd rather be single than have to run game every day of my life. I'm too much the deluded man's idea of woman - I want to be open and honest and int…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/24 04:54 AM
1

90th percentile of the entire industry, no weighting, per capita.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/24 09:27 PM
1

What do you think more accurate estimate of "carry in first 15 years of career"? Assume 90th percentile since that's what we're both talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/24 07:03 PM
1

PE, of course! Did you ever realize significant carry as a partner? I've run the numbers and it seems beyond the bull case to get over $4m in carry before 40, and if you spread that out evenly over the working years is ~240k per year and no compounding getting carry comes with very high and multidimensional risk (did the fund turn enough of a profit and exit successfully?) relative to RSUs. Which if you do most of your career in PE, you have the cognitive ability to make $200k in RSU by 27, with…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/24 10:59 PM
1

I would not. I have the money for both of us to live to a high standard anywhere (~$47k/month gross, which roughly equals net: once you get money you never sell anything to generate a taxable event, you borrow against your assets and hedge.) If she insists on working and makes less than I have to pay to retain a staff of cook, maid, chauffeur/butler/personal assistant, and perhaps governess, her time is definitionally malinvested from an economic point of view and I expect her resources: cogniti…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 03:22 AM
1

By finance do you mean IB or MM/HFT?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 03:00 AM
1

Startup exits, successful trading or lucky trading,¹ ten years as a successful quant OR making meets expectations working in big tech for 10 years and watching your stock grants quintuple and then quintuple again while job hopping four times to a position paying $700k ($400k of it in stock that quadruples...), patents, royalties off the top of my head. According to the 33x rule, once you have $10m in the bank you can withdraw $330k per year without touching the principal even in low inflation ti…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 02:59 AM
1

I think you're closer to truth than others and that ambition and passion are nothing but proxies for hoping that the man will continually become more valuable than he is now, consistently surpassing the woman. This is a probabilistic or hopeful gamble on the future This can happen iff he is willing to work. As a backup, he can contribute to household work in case the gamble fails or is reversed for a short time
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/24 10:26 PM
4

Personality is more heavily weughted in RMV. Looks are weighted in SMV. For ONS, the personality threshold is usually "can I bear being around you long enough to nut?"
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 12:32 AM
–

You're correct for at least the bottom two standard deviations of women in my experience. Especially Americans.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 09:41 AM
–

This is where I say "I'm a 6 in looks, a 7 in personality, a 9.91 in provisioning capability, a 9.97 in IQ, and an 11 in extra." Those are literally and precisely accurate except for my judgement of my personality (women think I'm either a 1-2 or 10) and in extraness.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/24 05:22 AM
1

Plenty of the underclass and the existence of widespread abortion stand ready to take the contrapositive on that.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/24 12:58 AM
1

What happened then made us who we are and is fully applicable because we inherited our minds, emotions, and instincts from people who were successful in that environment for 40,000 and more years compared to the past few hundred of monogamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 10:45 PM
2

Personal responsibility is an ethical assertion. I affirm it. Free will is a metaphysical and scientific assertion. I deny it. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-responsibility/#FreeRespDete https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/compatibilism/#HierComp
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 06:12 PM
2

Your response was predetermined according to general relativity's entailment of eternalism via the nonsimultaneity of causality. If causes can appear in different order to different observers, all moments, past, future, and present are equally real. This is just one piece of evidence from physics and neurology bolstering one of the few established results of philosophy. In the final estimation the book to be written on determinism and free will is called "It Doesn't Practically Matter", because …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 05:06 PM
1

Uh... historically, hunter-gatherers were polygamous, as were pastoral peoples.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 04:56 PM
1

I'm a determinist. Free will is a philosophical or metaphysical position, not a political one. I think you're equating "free will" with "freedom from coercion". I deny the former and affirm the latter.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 04:53 PM
1

We observe people having children and the demographic transition. There's not much impact of the oral contraceptive or the condom demonstrated on birth rates and there are no reliable data on the sex to conception ratio, except by inference in the use of reproductive technologies (the existence and expansion of which indicate a reproductive drive) and age at first childbirth.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 04:49 PM
1

I take it as axiomatic or else there would be nothing but unplanned pregnancies. I think evidence distinguishing sex drive from reproduction drive, if such a distinction with a difference exists, would be a very valuable contribution to the discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 04:46 PM
-1

I don't believe in free will but this is an absolute strawman. Nothing in my post implies denigration of the non-aggression principle, which is the only actual right anyone has: autonomy in their bodies and their property.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 04:43 PM
3

I think you're right which is why the intellectual half of a connection that I see as being inseparable from the emotional part turns women on but the second turns them off. Unless it's some deep and dread secret like being polyamorous that has the unintended effect of running dread game.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 01:50 PM
1

Let me know if you figure it out. One of the best threads I've seen on here. I'm stuck with this problem all the time because the women I want to fuck more than for sport I want to see and be seen by, but the two things mix like shit and stew. I'm like bordering on demisexual for relationships and make those deep intellectivo-emotional connections super easily with almost anyone (the intellectual connection matters far more to me), and I don't find the intellectual connection alone to be a turn-…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 01:30 PM
–

For someone who puts him or herself forward as rational (see comment history) any cognitive bias can be dismissed in the absence of evidence. Claims require evidence. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. I'm engaging with OP in the spirit she engages this forum: that of a hard-nosed rationalist, not as a woman venting about chad and incels, regardless of how much this singular post screams otherwise. Would we do different for a man?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 01:13 PM
–

If you'd say 16-18, we'd have a point of agreement because the literature indicates that, as does makeup and fashion to exaggerate evolved of neoteny. To say "most men would show an interest in younger teens" - by definition 13-14 or 13-15 - is an exaggeration unsupported by research or observation in normal (defined as "within +/-2σ of the population mean") men.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 01:06 PM
–

Based on her comment history it seems like it's trolling or trauma or she knows something I don't, because most of my skimming indicates an eminently rational look at Western human mating dynamics.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 01:03 PM
–

Skimming your comment history, since a few commenters have derisively remarked upon it, I'm tempted to say you're a man LARPing as a woman, so thoroughly do you appear to grasp the core of the red pill idea (applied and jargonized evolutionary psychology) better than most men without degenerating into female dating strategy. Whether or not it wins you any success in the dating world, or whether you are a man or a woman, you, u/Novel-Tip-7570, have my respect for looking reality more squarely in …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 01:02 PM
–

This is becoming my first OP because it addresses fundamental errors repeatedly made. Tl;dr both sexes have evolved and maintain rational mating strategies that just are, not "predatory" or "transactional" or otherwise amenable to retrospective value judgement as so many posters here assume. The only argument contra is to say our current environment is so far from the environment of evolutionary adaptation as to render meaningless one or both sexes' evolved strategies. The demographic transition…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 12:45 PM
4

My man.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 01:21 AM
1

Culture in the old country is still suffused with Orthodoxy and Orthodox ideals even though everyone is an atheist. In America everyone is a fundamentalist but the cultures are completely secular and riven with discord.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/24 04:45 PM
2

I am a Slav but that's irrelevant. I was speaking to enculturation into Western late modernity. I thanked you for your long post and never said I wasn't reading it. I did, and then thanked you (see above) for "raising the level of discourse", which is a good thing. The standard short responses are pretty bad at doing anything but scoring points with "your side" in a tribalistic way. I do not see how you could interpret my reply as a "low-key insult" unless you take it as the horrid trope "sarcas…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/24 08:10 PM
1

A win for women should be a win for men and vice versa because we're all in this species-level arms race. Questioning ideology is always good. It's why I hold no "pill" - ideology in that case is like the reification of a sociosexual and psychological toolkit and minmaxing for notch count. Dalrock was one of the best representatives.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 11:10 PM
1

I think the blend of Occidental and Oriental seems quite clear here. I'd guess you're near 100% Ukrainian or East Slavic at least but are at least second generation and completely socialized in and almost solely enculturated to the Western milieu. This turns into a nature-nurture debate eventually. Still, I extend my thanks for this wall of text and to u/shesarevolution for attempting to raise the level of discourse in here. It used to be much less shitty, like Blind before 2023.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 11:05 PM
1

This is honestly bullshit. Humans have instincts and urges but we also developed reason to guide and direct them out of maladaptive canalizations. Hypergamy is a fact, but once you're in the top 20%, tuff difference between it and the top 10% is vanishing small. Most of the differentiation is between personalities, styles, and shapes of women and men. This gives the truth in "people have a type". OP also forgets about risk aversion. Women need a significant advantage to give up the relatively gu…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 10:52 PM
1

Molly leaves me depressed like a speed binge, but mushrooms, psilocin, and their derivatives - plain DMT and the 4-substituted tryptamines - have a great afterglow that tapers off over the next day or two to me. Timeframes are identical, perception is opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/24 01:04 AM
1

Do you mean a proper fetish or hard kink? Someone is dismissing this line of thought by trying to frame it as dependent on paraphilia fetish.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/24 12:57 AM
1

You started off strong with your earlier comments and made a UFO-speed turn into left field here, bud.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/24 12:52 AM
1

That's what we're saying. Current partner not worth the effort is the topic of discussion, not assertion.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/24 12:50 AM
1

Despite what you might believe from the rest of my comments on the topic, I strongly agree with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/24 12:46 AM
1

But Chad isn't Chad to every woman. I'm Chad to my social circle - it's why they are my circle - but some sort of unwashed toe filth to urban gym bunnies, who have dumb, abrasive, overbuilt Chad. Different women index on different subsets of the set of "evolutionarily desirable characteristics", as do men: otherwise skinny, average, and thick women wouldn't all be capable of Stacy status. I'm disliked on most of Reddit but liked on TikTok and loved on Twitch. Why? The only answer to be found is …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/24 12:45 AM
2

I do, but what about the rest of my sex? That's an option generally available only to the young, cut and hung or the powerful, rich and funny. Handsome helps both sides, as does a larger-than-life personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/24 12:34 AM
1

Agreed.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/24 03:29 AM
0

Juxtaposing the words "socialist" and "utopia" unironically is further evidence in favor of my original assertion.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 11:51 AM
3

My detractors already know this but would rather it not be shouted from the rooftops.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 10:26 AM
3

Did you read where I explicitly said "exceptions for where they tried it but didn't like it?" Did I write that in Greek? Did I not? Ηερε θου γοηστ θεν, τρυ ρηδινγ βεφορε υ ρεπλυ.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 10:14 AM
2

I'm agreeing with you more intensely than you are. I mean to say this "risk" isn't worthy of the name "risk" since a risk entails a chance of success, and this strategy has none. "Downside optionality" is probably an obscure phrasing which I catch on rereading because I'm an autist. Meaning the best possible outcome is to end up where you started, and there're a fuckton of worse possible outcomes.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 09:59 AM
5

Then rephrase: "If greater effort is not given to you in what you care about compared to the effort given by your ex in what his or her ex cared about." You're indexing on accidents instead of essence.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 09:58 AM
2

Risk does not equal nearly guaranteed failure with only downside optionality.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 03:23 AM
1

As a man, I feel the same, but my bar for liking you can be forged and jumped in a couple of hours. And based on my experience I'm an outlier among men in having a bar that high.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 03:13 AM
3

Haha, yeah. Feminism ended up being about women taking the worst aspects of masculinity into themselves and eventually, after gaining cultural hegemony in institutions and becoming the dominant narrative, giving the worst parts of femininity to men as an ostensible ideal. Not just in sex, but in just about everything from business to philosophy where the feminine could have had a moderating or positive contribution, the women just tried to imitate the men who were already there. The result is ge…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 03:05 AM
1

Succinct and correct. We've "shown our work" ad nauseam, it's time for a boilerplate summary like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 02:57 AM
2

Username doesn't check out.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 02:55 AM
0

You'd be called irrational or inconsistent in your political and economic preferences. That might sound like an insult but it's far better than being owned by an ideology.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 02:52 AM
1

"Tax the productive because I want free shit." This is the proverbial uncle Sam turned into Daddy Sam by legions of women voters in action, Euro style. I have rarely seen such a ringing and unselfaware endorsement of Austrian economics and red pill analysis of the State.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 02:49 AM
3

The non-aggression principle entails autonomy, yes. I don't have to like it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 02:46 AM
0

I'm an ancap all the way through.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 02:45 AM
0

In my entire time on the internet I've met three people who rub me this wrongly. One in 2009 in WoW, one in 2015 on Facebook. Beware possessing certitude and people who pretend to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 02:26 AM
2

Which high-value single men in their 30s are dating anywhere near their age? 🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 02:22 AM
1

It benefits high-value men exclusively, harms high-value women and lower-value men, and is a double-edged sword for the rest of women, opening up the short-term market at the cost of value destruction.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 02:19 AM
3

If you care about how much the other person is attracted to you relative to the most intense attraction she (or he, more rarely) is capable of, it should make you feel inadequate. That's evolution's way of telling you that you're not being selected, but permitted, and is a strong predictor of other valuable relationship behaviors down the line. Partners who are tenth choices generally get the short end of the stick in every way, not just sexually.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/24 10:54 PM
-1

Unironically one of the best takes in this thread, and it's from a blue pill woman 🙃
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/24 10:49 PM
3

Comparison is a - the only - means of evaluating the true level of attraction. Behaviors dominate words.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/24 10:48 PM
7

If a man gets angry at what boils down to your lack of attraction to him, it's immature. Speaking as a man, the only reason you don't want to do them anymore is because you're not that attracted to me. If you were, you'd want to. The exceptions are having tried something and not liked it or having trauma between then and now, not, as another poater aptly put it, "cuz reasons". If it's "cuz reasons", it's because of feelings and desire and their relative lack of intensity. Getting angry at your l…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/24 10:46 PM
4

Absolutely not okay, because it's not just indicative but dispositive evidence the person is settling and really just not that into you. Possible exceptions made for "tried it but didn't like it" or intervening trauma.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/24 10:38 PM
1

Thank you again for the reply. After deep reflection (more a crisis point than the result of deep reflection, as I am an inertial creature), I have come to a place where I would like more specific advice. May I DM you as my LTR did indeed discover this thread even with the precautions taken? I think adding an additional sockpuppet to continue the same conversation would be ineffectual. Sooner rather than later would be best. I see ye have a Discord group in the sidebar, but you are familiar with…
/r/RPChristians04/08/22 02:46 PM
1

Ed: don't know who downvoted you, I upvoted. Thanks. Anything further? I've read the sidebar and am still lost: my church is full of people on the road to heaven. (Remote worker.) Evangelize in the gym and the bars and trust in God that a group will fall out on me? I have extensive successful leadership experience without any power but soft power at work so have plenty of experience at building up disparate groups of people into a common unity, but methinks much of that success is due to an unde…
/r/RPChristians04/07/22 11:31 PM
1

Do you have resources on "Mission" applicable transdenominationally or to trad Catholics further than the sidebar? I've joined your discord but would like to be better prepared for this aspect of, shall I say, requiring additional discipling. I don't think asking my church's publishing house to take a look at my philosophy of history is quite what you mean by "mission", no flippancy intended, and I'm at a loss for what my voco is if not for that and my job (making the world a more secure and pri…
/r/RPChristians04/07/22 02:22 AM
1

Divorce and related social pathologies are rare among the upper-middle class, hovering around 1960 levels as the ever-controversial Murray showed in Coming Apart. It's likely your entire family is high SES and, being related, share in the same heritable traits that correlate with life outcomes. Divorce in my family is also unheard of, except for the unrelated stepchildren of a relative. My own adult extended social experience is circumscribed by my own circumstances, which is to say the Big Tech…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 03:53 AM
5

I said that "the truth" mentioned above ("I'm convinced that some women can handle the truth...") is identical to 1. The truth about intersexual dynamics, and 2. That is identical to TRP. I further said that if your theory of knowledge does not admit of objectivity, reasoned debate is itself unreasonable, giving a canonical example of a prima facie incoherent theory of knowledge that does not admit objectivity. This plainly answers your question, "What truth is that?" Further, TRP's most importa…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/22 02:33 PM
3

Being an RPW or trad woman is itself a marketable skill or state of being via the dating and marriage markets where the skill helps the woman land a man with higher TC than she could have otherwise. Of all the couples I know a supermajority fall into the following 2 categories: Two tech people, household TC $500k-1m+. Few fights about gender roles because whatever isn't possessed by members of the dyad can be outsourced or bought on the open market: technology, nannies, schooling, maids, high-en…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/22 02:21 PM
1

That "the red pill" and "intersexual dynamics and human mating rituals, objectively viewed" are in an identity relationship with one another. Objectivity further is a necessary condition for man's understanding of truth. Unless you're a standpoint epistemologist, then there's no reaching you until you get your philosophy corrected.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/22 02:00 PM
1

Yeah, I've read the whole thing many times (but have only read the OT once, except for parts of the Pentateuch, Prophets, Psalms, and wisdom writings that I read regularly; the Psalms I sing weekly as part of the divine office). My church isn't known for its missionary zeal in the days since Vatican II, nor for having a strong community in most parishes (local churches), and I've looked. It sounds like something I'd need to found a lay apostolate for and that runs in to the chicken and egg probl…
/r/RPChristians29/06/22 05:00 AM
1

I thank you and other posters for your replies; it has given me much to think over. It's difficult to hit the gym working 60h/wk (the benefits of being staff level!) but the work itself requires discipline so as I write this I realize it's a thin and flabby excuse given that I literally live above a LA Fitness and across the street from an Equinox Fitness. I've simply not prioritized it due to being in a extant relationship (?) even if it's mostly gone. The teeth require extensive dental (orthod…
/r/RPChristians28/06/22 09:26 AM
2

R1. Said man is me speaking vaguely and with circumlocution because my cohabiting girlfriend of years (how RP and Christian of me... /s) is also on reddit and half the details of either my situation or position in the world are enough to dox me to even passing acquaintances no matter how many alts I use. Q1. I find plenty of women, but none who share my religion and politics, want many children, and aren't a significant step down. I'm probably a 5.5-6.5 in SMV[1] but my high current earning powe…
/r/RPChristians26/06/22 09:01 PM
1

Though I do not follow this advice and exegetes will debate on whether this passage was a command of Paul's or a quote of the Corinthians (when he says "not the Lord but I Paul saith"), there's not much higher authority in the world than the words of St Paul in a canonical book.
/r/RPChristians26/06/22 05:48 PM
3

I wish Dalrock were still around. He understood better than most - even Rollo Tomassi made this error - that RP is a toolkit for living against the time (what Evola called revolt against the modern world) as a traditionally strong man, in a process of continual adaptation and overcoming both of self and external obstacles - and not just a socio-sexual strategy and set of tactics. Intersexual dynamics birthed or catalyzed RP, but RP fully expanded is as broad as psychology or evolutionary psychol…
/r/RPChristians26/06/22 05:44 PM
2

And we often sleep around anyways, though this is sin and a distortion of the ideal order of things God has set before us.
/r/RPChristians26/06/22 05:38 PM
2

What would you say for someone with high probability of making $200k+ at 30, like a driven computer science graduate? What about a man already making $350k in his early 30s where biological children are a driving force in his life, though he has yet to have any? Assume this man either wanted to become a friar[1] and pray for and teach the world if having children is an option absolutely closed to him, or he's on track to r/FIRE by 45 and will retire into a second career of teaching college, and …
/r/RPChristians26/06/22 05:35 PM
5

It just so happens that outlier IQ is slightly more frequent among men than women and sociopathic personality is almost 1000% more frequent in men. The correlated traits of low agreeableness, very low neuroticism, and high extraversion are all more common in men singly and significantly more common in men as a complex of all three. Moderate conscientiousness (enough to do your work very well, not enough to feel compelled to follow the rules or hierarchy) is roughly equivalent between the sexes. …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 05:55 AM
-1

Talk about lack of self-awareness.* It has nothing to do with the environment, everything to do with the higher SMV of the man. This is a laborious, non-parsimonious explanation of something better explained by SMV differentials, life history theory, and mating strategies. SMV and cad/dad have the benefit of (1) being supported by evolutionary psychology, (2) being observed in other species of animal, and (3) predicting things instead of being a just-so story for one thing (human hookups). Your …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/21 04:07 AM
2

Geoffrey Miller (The Mating Mind) has a book of essays on it called Virtue Signaling: Essays in Darwinian Politics that's well worth reading.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/21 04:43 PM
1

r/femcels is too androcentric and right-wing for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/21 04:42 PM
1

There are plenty of women willing to pay for Chad. I'm the walking definition of betabux, I should know. I'm good with it: the marginal cost of a dollar to me is less than the marginal cost of additional physical or personality improvement, so my highest possible relationship RoI is in that role. I like to think that's my evolutionary niche. It's enabled me to have children so it's not obviously a poor strategy but it's not obviously the optimal one either. The downside is in being consciously b…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/21 04:34 PM
6

This is a female cognitive bias or discrepancy between the biological sexes' views of interpersonal interaction. There's no such thing as 'Platonic' friendship between man and woman from the perspective of man. Look at all the studies done showing how any 'friendly' act or attention (from the point of view of woman) is taken as a sign of romantic and sexual interest (by man). Women's male friends whom the woman has never had sex with are either beta orbiters, gay, or friends from early childhood…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/21 04:38 PM
2

This is Reddit, a website that has lots of subreddits, or boards, which begin with a letter 'r' followed by a forward slash. I think you're looking for r/femaledatingstrategy, r/twoxchromosomes, and r/chapotraphouse.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/21 05:54 AM
1

Gay porn is also about 2.5x more popular among women than among men according to that same Pornhub/Buzzfeed piece.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/21 05:52 AM
1

Mine are blowing all four cardinal directions at once.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/21 05:47 AM
1

It's common on the West Coast and wherever else Wokeistan rears its head and among emo/alt/college girls, relatively uncommon everywhere else.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/21 05:46 AM
3

They have pretty reliable studies on this, both based on self-reporting, psychological and neurological profiling, and epidemiological study of disease transmission. The verdict which never changes more than a few points: between 2-6% of men are mostly or exclusively gay, about an additional 1-2% are bisexual, and about 0.1-0.3% of men have transgender tendencies or gender dysphoria, not counting what were called 'transvestites' a few years ago, which make up some additional unknown percentage. …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/21 05:44 AM
1

You're indifferent towards ugly women because they could still be bred, you know, the billion-year evolutionary arc and purpose of sex, and repulsed by ugly men because they cannot. Even if you're of that weird new age religion called 'childfree' you can't disable the selfish gene - you're just a lever moved by them, programmed by the code of life which evolved to be so successful at self-replicating that it covered the earth far beyond natural carrying capacity.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/21 05:38 AM
2

Have very strong antisocial personality tendencies minus the crime (why steal when you make this much?), am not physically attractive, can confirm. It also helps immensely when climbing the upper ranks (above L5/M0) in the corporate world as well, which is probably why I've never been attracted to crime. The risk/reward payoff is absolutely terrible unless you're a kingpin, and even then it's still pretty bad. My risk tolerance isn't that high.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/21 06:46 PM
0

I'm below average in looks and have what most consider an abhorrent personality both in presentation and core belief. (If I were Chad, my personality and beliefs would be considered less abhorrent.) Money makes up the difference. Beta bux. I perform abysmally on apps and well in traditional dating. Beta bux!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 02:35 AM
3

Good question. I think the science points towards the answer being both.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 01:19 AM
2

Can switch off all but anger when faced with someone I consider inimicus. Add disgust and an overwhelming desire to cleanse or purify or rectify(?) when faced with the hostis. One of the reasons I hypothesize men have a more competitive emotional spectrum that partially overlaps women's. Inimicus is a personal enemy, hostis is an enemy of the ingroup you most identify with. To Schmitt, the guy who created the distinction, hostiles were enemies of the state and inimici 'personal foes'.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 01:18 AM
2

Based.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 01:13 AM
2

You're confusing evolved adaptations with 'nurture made me do it'.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 01:12 AM
2

Am man, can confirm as true of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 01:11 AM
1

Capitalism is nothing but a system for valuing things with every single dollar in society getting a vote. As long as you're not talking State monopolies like teaching, policing, being a politician, those which are paid less offer less utility to society.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 01:10 AM
7

Because child support costs less than child support and/or alimony plus half your net worth?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 01:04 AM
1

Yes, it's the female analog to porn.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 07:54 PM
2

-- A Gay Supports the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/21 06:53 PM
2

A fellow student of Girard are you, I see.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/21 06:52 PM
1

Not surprising that your English teachers taught you feminism with how converged to postmaterial leftism ('theory') English departments have been for the past couple decades.
/r/RedPillWomen26/01/21 07:24 PM
1

The phrase 'who cares what men want?' has that connotation in English. What? Do they speak English in What?
/r/RedPillWomen25/01/21 02:37 PM
1

Men say this as much as women. It's archetypal, stereotypical blue-pill advice for men and is lampooned as such in RP spaces.
/r/RedPillWomen24/01/21 03:42 AM
1

Not everyone is the ubermensch like you 🙄 Should have thrown some Aristotle in there along with Kant. Aristotle takes in to account the rest of us who aren't perfect on the first try.
/r/RedPillWomen24/01/21 03:38 AM
2

You should have said this instead of your first post. Find some other way to express 'who cares what men want?' because for better or worse the phrase is freighted with baggage and immediately calls to mind women embitteted by lack of success, harpies instead of a soft place to land, and 'it's this woman's army' more-man-than-men feminists.
/r/RedPillWomen24/01/21 03:37 AM
3

Leftist* area. Leftist. There's nothing progressive about regressive tribalism, regressive free sex as if we were bonobos or other lower apes living in an age of temple prostitutes and harems for the wealthy, and regressive expressive individualism.
/r/RedPillWomen24/01/21 03:27 AM
4

The ability to pair bond decreases with the second partner and monotonically decreases with each partner after that until somewhere between 15-20 partners. This is likely an effect of having fucked so many people you realize none are that special and are willing to settle because the men you want don't want you anymore, which is jaded cynicism, not an inflection point of restoration of pair bonding ability. In the above, rates of divorce or admitted infidelity are used as correlates of pair bond…
/r/RedPillWomen24/01/21 03:24 AM
3

There's no point or age where virginity is a deficit. The virginal woman is always significantly more attractive and of higher RMV than the experienced woman assuming all else is equal. The one situation where virginity is a deficit is if you're looking for hookups or ONS instead of LTR.
/r/RedPillWomen24/01/21 03:18 AM
1

There's no viable LTR strategy for women older than late 20s seeking a high-SMV man. Before that, the strategy seems to be, on average, date slightly below yourself in looks, significantly above it in age (F25 to M35 at the low end), and extremely above yourself in economic value. This is what I see play out in my circles for that minority of relatively high SMV men that ever marry in the circle of nouveaux-riches technologists in their early 30s to late 40s. IME a man's wealth and TC (RMV) on t…
/r/RedPillWomen24/01/21 03:01 AM
2

Man here. Don't really have emotions to express that often. When they're particularly intense, I do. IME men's emotions tend toward the competition spectrum of pride, triumph and defeat. We more often oppose joy to anger instead of sadness. The social emotions like envy, jealousy, schadenfreude, and embarrassment are more peripheral to men. IME men would rather forego validation and commiseration for honor and principles. I think this is corollary to the people/things orientation, with ideas sub…
/r/RedPillWives19/01/21 07:30 PM
2

It remains the case in my circles (older big tech SWEs), with women having what you call a hobby-job, often after working at the same FAANG as their husband for a few years. The ability to pull down mid-200s at a FAANG is proof they can profitably work. The second largest set are women who have absolutely no connection to the high-TC lifestyle, FAANG wokeness, or generational wealth. I hypothesize that more men would like this, but the sheer ease and inertia of meeting a woman at work outweighs …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/20 04:29 PM
2

I'm a literal sexist and still accept that alpha/beta are archetypes. The 'incel' is the person, not the archetype. Some RPers used to call such a man a gamma, IIRC. Delta was men capable of change; sigma was the alt-loner.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/20 04:20 PM
1

I'm an ugly asshole with bad teeth, but I'm rich and 6' 4''. Water seeks its own level.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/20 02:52 AM
1

This topic can't be honestly discussed without noting intergroup differences.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/20 03:24 PM
1

Because the Left calls anything that's not postmaterial SocJus Left 'Right-wing extremism'. When Alexis de Tocqueville, the ghost of Robert E Lee, Francis Parker Yockey, Spengler, and Hans-Hermann Hoppe would look at an ideology and gasp because of its Rightness, it's far Right. America has no native Rightism because it never had a landed aristocracy and was egalitarian from inception (Gottfried, Making Sense of the American Right), full of misfits with high trait openness who emigrated across a…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/20 08:16 PM
1

There is no US or Anglophone culture or civilization, and thus no population. The US rules over several civilizations or tribes, just like every other empire: USSR, Rome, etc. The Soviet Union didn't make Germans into Russians into Chechens into Jews. The existence of the United States government doesn't make Africans into Whites, or Asians into blacks, or Jews into Finns. Anyone who speaks English is by definition an anglophone. Anglophones are no more a people than the Republic of Letters was …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/20 06:34 AM
3

There is no overall population. There are only civilizations, societies, and tribes. Empire is a legal fiction.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/20 05:53 AM
1

Generation Z is going to lead the boogaloo and establish the ethnostate. It seems that you're talking about college-educated, leftist, feminist Generation Z females.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/20 03:47 AM
1

Get behind me, Satan
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/20 03:41 AM
1

And this post is where we learn OP is an extremist feminist for knowing and mentioning FDS without irony or disgust.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/20 03:39 AM
2

Imported population isn't population, but replacement.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/20 03:36 AM
1

Population of most White countries*
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/20 03:35 AM
0

Adoption is good for these feminists because it takes their genes out of the evolutionary struggle. As long as it's intraethnic and doesn't squander group resources and depress group fitness. (Importing 1 genetically distant child who marries in to the native population is genetically equivalent to not having - or killing - up to about 950 native children in the most extreme case, of Han Chinese to Xhosa: Salter, On Genetic Interests, table VI.) For anyone else, it's the only way a female can be…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/20 03:20 AM
1

I'm going to fall in to this trap headfirst. Now that I've lampshaded it: Objectively? Number of children. I will be more represented in the next generation than I am in this one. This is objective evolutionary success, but doesn't mean what it used to in our EEA. I could have had more children and not raised them, and, likewise, many inferior persons are capable of having many children today because of social safety nets, redistribution, and more generally strongly dysgenic left-statist policy.…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 10:03 PM
1

Trump is not a Rightist. He's a populist center-leftist. I'm a man of the Right, not a fucking Republican or Trumpist.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 09:58 PM
5

I'm a borderline or mild autist and this describes my experience perfectly, with the exception that the vast majority of women who find me interesting and attractive at first (my height, build, and occupation don't hurt) begin to find me annoying after a few dates and politically and religiously repulsive thereafter. I have no abiding interest in typical human activity that's not solitary study of rather arcane academica, so the runway of common ground lasts precisely as far as small talk. It's …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/20 03:04 AM
3

I'm a far Rightist. Life is competition, and competition is hierarchy. Survive, thrive, or fall behind and die.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/20 02:51 AM
-2

Arabs are badass. Along with Russians, we have the only civilization not on the verge of collapse, and it's thanks to traditional religious mores (even though I converted to Melkite Catholicism).
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/20 06:27 AM
0

Slut shaming is a virtue and a civilizational defense mechanism. Now you're seeing why. The same as Jordan Peterson's maligned 'enforced monogamy'. I'm married but most certainly was an extreme nerd growing up, and had the struggle. (Admitted) N count over 1 was an immediate DQ. I figure that was probably 2 or 3 in reality. I'm fully aware my most attractive feature is my wallet, but the absolute and ineradicable biological and religious imperative to procreate dictates that it's better to be be…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/20 06:18 AM
8

A 4 with a six pack and patagonia isn't an 8.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/20 11:15 PM
0

Women aren't superior in attractiveness, but are gatekeepers of sex. It's not the same thing, but has the same effects.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/20 11:12 PM
1

Sadly, because the 1950s were the seedbed of degeneracy. Culture had already rotted through but still had a pretty facade. However, we will soon restore the 1650s religiously and the 1840s culturally, but with electricity and medicine.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/20 03:04 AM
-2

Flair checks out except for the 'man' part. Might want to get that switched to 'male'.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/20 02:59 AM
-2

Being barren by choice is against nature, goodness, and truth and puts you in a minority even in this generation. 'Childfree': voluntary extinction: free of sense, free of life, free of a future. I'm a software engineer at a Left Cost big N, and want a homemaker, not a duplicate of myself. In accordance with Darwinism and religion, I want as many children as I can have while remaining within the bounds of civilization and religion.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/20 02:52 AM
2

FDS means feminist extremist, so the guy is lucky to have dodged a bullet.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/20 12:11 AM
1

Why do you spell 'simp' with an 'e'?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/20 05:43 PM
1

It is as God wills.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/20 02:31 AM
1

Gender doesn't exist, sex roles are biological, the end.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/20 01:11 AM
1

There's no such thing as a 'little-c Christian'. You're either washed in the blood, or damned. A 'little-c catholic' is someone with wide tastes; a 'little-c Christian' is someone who is the Flying Spaghetti Monster.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/20 01:06 AM
2

Why do you think we evolved perfumes?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/20 12:59 AM
2

BDE spends money on himself to the degree it triggers provider signaling.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/20 12:55 AM
1

This mostly holds true of me. I'm a patriarchist who even other traditional Catholics think goes too far, but have alpha-tier beta bucks money and am so politically "extremist" that most people think I'm funny, believing me to be performing edgy caricature instead of espousing true beliefs. I can't judge my own attractiveness, though it's certainly not far above average.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/20 12:54 AM
4

Females think they deserve money for breathing. Evolved in to them to seek provision.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/20 02:12 AM
1

Man up. Read the Stoics. Amor fati.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/20 05:47 PM
3

Your flair doesn't say 'cuck'.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/20 09:58 PM
1

Yep. I was/am a man who's looksmatched locked at the mid part of the spectrum, have a personality generally considered loathsome (self-absorbed in studies which I believe to be civilization-saving, workaholic to boot, extreme far rightwinger, extremely trad Catholic but big sinner: I talk about myself, work, theology, and the coming rightwing revolution almost exclusively), refuse to consume media which is leftist propaganda (which is all of it, and leaves me to my solitary writings), and it doe…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/20 05:36 PM
6

I got rich (actually rich, not $140k salary) and entered my 30s, which I've found guarantees me a supply of female attention if I let it be known. A lot of that female attention is from women hitting the wall, but not all of it. Almost all of it is undesirable. The low-to-middling value man who becomes wealthy is probably the closest a man can come to empathizing with the female who bitches about getting 'the wrong kind of attention' and 'having men only want you for your holes', pump and dump: …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/20 10:10 PM
1

Unless the guy is irreplaceable and there are only a handful of private-sector cryptographers on the planet...
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/20 05:44 AM
2

Feelings aren't even one basis of many of law or ethics. Unless, perhaps, you're a utilitarian, but then you have bigger problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/20 05:42 AM
7

Fifty Shades of Grey
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/20 05:39 AM
-1

Mater semper certa est.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/20 11:55 PM
2

It's true. Civilization basically arose from the process of restraint of the violent impulses of men to take others' property, whether cattle (the etymology from proto-Indo-Aryan means 'movable wealth', like 'chattel'), land, women, or slaves. Slavery arose from a parallel instinct to polygyny: to subdue who one can subdue in furtherance of one's own genetic interests. Back of all of these instincts is a prime directive to reproduce often. I'll expand that to private property more generally in c…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/20 10:25 PM
0

Oh goy. Flair checks out, Solomon.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/20 10:16 PM
8

The White one. It's okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/20 01:58 AM
1

Hippie simp found
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/20 01:55 AM
-2

It would be based if we weren't evolved creatures whose entire reason for existence is procreation. I foresee a movement of MGTOW creationists.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/20 01:52 AM
4

Marriage has always selected for financial success. Harems for men and dad/cad for women, the harems designed in a sexual arms race to defeat dad/cad.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/20 01:46 AM
14

They will end up spinsters either way. You can't escape the past.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/20 01:43 AM
2

The really smart guys go their own way, grind leetcode to get in to software engineering*, make $120k as a new grad, and $250-450k with 10 YoE. Now, at 32-35 (coinciding with peak male SMV and well past the wall for females), they are to the dating market what the hot 19-year-old girl was, and in a position to dictate their terms in relationships and marriages, financially and otherwise. They have become visible, and have fuck-you money. --a software engineer *You can do this in investment banki…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/20 01:40 AM
2

She disagreed because disagreeing made her rich and never again in need of male provisioning. She got the most possible provision with the least possible cost.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/20 03:34 AM
1

print(f"Intersectional NPC detected")
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/20 03:30 AM
3

We are 'de-evolving'... it's called dysgenesis and has been occurring for at least 6 generations, maybe as many as 100. Richard Lynn takes the first view in Dysgenics; Figueredo, Woodley, et al. take the second in Modernity and Cultural Decline. Jensen and Nyborg back it up with the reverse Flynn effect (The Scientific Study of General Intelligence, 8).
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/20 03:27 AM
2

I lol'd at this... honor culture disappeared from the West by the end of the 19th c.; wherever dueling disappeared, it's because the culture of honor had already dissipated.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/20 03:20 AM
0

Those are honestly-held truths. Nothing whatsoever trumps free speech rights, regardless of bad American court decisions which restrict them. Live in a repressive country where free speech isn't allowed and get back to me. What started off as a request to leave meetings when people were shooting the shit morphed in to basically a request for a speech code to protect feelings.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/20 11:26 PM
-1

Do you even evolution bro
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/20 11:15 PM
-1

Natural selection eliminates that choice after a generation. The raison d'etre of life is to produce more life.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/20 10:27 PM
1

Sexism rarely hurts a man's chances unless it's super overt or he's trying to date a triggered-happy feminist.* *Likely inapplicable to metro or scene-styled guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/20 08:21 PM
-1

Barren*
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/20 08:12 PM
-1

I'm ugly af without a beard, but with a short and tightly trimmed goatee (about 1/3-1/2" below the bottom of the chin) covering my weak chin and lengthening my face just slightly, I go up to like a 5 or 6. Lifting and job offset my personality, and looks come out neutral.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/20 08:09 PM
2

Feminist garbage.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/20 04:56 AM
7

The fact that it indicates a lady of loose morals is eternal. I thought men were supposed to be the overly literal-minded sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/20 04:54 AM
2

No shit, I know a guy who pulls more women than three of me combined, and he's nine inches shorter than me.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/20 11:06 PM
2

If you count any of looks, build, tattoos, ethnic heritage, and mental illness, I do. I also hard-pass anyone who has had any cosmetic surgery, so the parts of those criteria that technology can in theory control (chest size, parts of looks, etc.), if altered, cause a second-level hard pass (having the correct traits but having gotten them in the wrong way). That's both rejecting women for things they can't do anything about and rejecting them for doing the wrong thing about them. I'm over 6 fee…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/20 11:01 PM
1

Women might say that to men, but do they really believe it? No. The concept of 'alpha widowhood' wouldn't make sense without it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/20 07:26 PM
8

First I thought you were a feminist, now I think you're a MGTOW. User flair checks out. The stats on lifetime sexual partners and distribution by age don't support your hypothesis. However, historically (using mtDNA and Y-chromosomal analysis), you may be right - in evolutionary time, it appears a far greater percentage of women than men have participated in reproduction.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 07:55 PM
8

Is a 20-year old man in his prime, or a 35? Now, for women? At some point, doesn't the available selection of partners increase for the man, and decrease for the woman? This is all that is meant by 'SMV'. Male attraction hinges on fertility signaling. Female attraction hinges on provisioning signaling. Yes, each sex's attraction includes a full spectrum of attributes, but fucktons of studies have been done bearing out the main contention here: men and women want different things in mates, which …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 07:46 PM
9

Because those guys have a similar number of options to the top women, but have an SMV that increases with age, establishment, and professional success. Thus the older male-younger female pairings which are historically ubiquitous. When the top-tier man settles, it's not with one of the girls who had fun with him, as a rule, nor her peers - it's with her, a decade in the past. The top tier of men can command what they prefer, so male desire shines through in a pure way: they don't have to settle …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 07:32 PM
3

Uhh, 250 million years of mammalian evolution have equated sex and babies long before you (or modernity, or hormonal birth control) came on the scene.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 05:48 PM
3

Everyone wants to be at the top of the heap. The top of the heap of men are ones who get sexual relationships on their terms. With the widespread availability of mass communication starting about 80 years ago, men have learned more of what the top of the heap get (they were previously ignorant of this, being limited in experience to their immediate social and geographic areas), and women have learned more about what top of the heap men are (they were previously ignorant of this for the same reas…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 05:10 PM
1

👍
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 05:01 PM
2

Let me interpret. 'Asshole' = not as successful, the right balance of emotionally available and unavailable, attractive and fit, etc. as the woman thought he was or would become when marrying him.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 04:59 PM
3

That's bullshit unless you only know borderliners.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 04:47 PM
5

Aka cad/dad.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 04:46 PM
20

Only the top few percent of women, if that, are able to net the guys they had their fun with, but most want to settle down eventually. This is where the concepts of 'the wall' (increasing male SMV and decreasing female SMV as function of increasing age) and 'alpha fucks, beta bucks' get their explanatory power, as the OP is asking, Why won't the alpha men commit to women who are done riding the cock carousel?, a classic hypergamous quandary.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 04:39 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter