TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Thievishmetal69 Archive

View 5 posts and 316 comments by Thievishmetal69 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

You give them too much credit. I wager many of them realize they 'won', they just want more.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 06:38 AM
4

I don't know how to make an actual break seriously how do you make a fucking line Like This But seriously, just hold shift and hit your dash key"-" to make an underscore"_". It should be two keys over to the left from the backspace key. Also, you don't need many.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 03:49 AM
16

Because at this point even publicly challenging feminist rhetoric is PR suicide. Feminists claim women have no power in society, yet if you question the ideology that 'advocates' for them you're literally zombie space hitler x10.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 03:45 AM
45

Rape culture as the term is applied by feminists is often a complete exaggeration. The only place in the first world where that term has credibility is in prisons.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 09:02 PM
5

The title of the TIL itself is its own dishonest victimization ploy, actual linked article is pretty much designed to trick the reader into believing the US military is now Egypt/India. This is the kind of garbage we're up against, even when more men are raped then women "WAT ABOUT TEH WYMYNZ MYSOGYINISTSSTTT ;_;". So when the rape of men isn't outright being denied as a possibility, even when it is acknowledged its swept under the rug as a non issue.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 09:35 AM
1

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1891vs/the_founding_essay_of_the_mens_rights_movement/
/r/MensRights20/03/13 06:11 AM
0

it's just ignored in law based on prejudice It's not prejudice when its a fact. Get a grip back on reality would you. Similar laws in the past have restricted the vote for women and blacks. Not even remotely similar. Restriction of agency based on age has a basis in reality, and is rational, sex or race based restrictions are irrational.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 06:11 AM
0

Maturity and poor/rich are subjective labels. Adults also make bad decisions. What's your point? Adults are expected to be agents of their own fate, accountable and responsible. Teenagers are essentially children in developing bodies, and developing minds, and should not be held to that standard, its rare even that a teenager is able to deal with the decisions appropriately that adults have to deal with consistently. Teenagers are immature and often incapable of dealing with serious problems gre…
/r/MensRights20/03/13 06:09 AM
0

Because I have better things to do than respond to people whose response to those who point out reality is call them bigots. Women are physically weaker than men BIGOT!!11 Teenagers are immature AGEIST!!11 I don't have time for people who can't even cope with reality.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 05:57 AM
2

I've dealt with trolls before, every person who has ever connected to the internet has, normal people ignore them, block them, report them, etc and move on with their lives, scummy opportunists play the role of the victim for their own gain. Her refusal to accept criticism of any kind legitimate or not is telling of what kind of person she is.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 10:29 PM
-4

Here's what I think about your accusation of "ageism". http://i.imgur.com/EIK83Zc.jpg
/r/MensRights19/03/13 10:26 PM
8

What...? Lol are you serious? For starters its not ageist, its a fact, teenagers are immature and make bad decisions, your tears can't change reality. Secondly, fuck off and die in a fire troll.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 06:40 PM
0

It was entirely within her control, she could have deleted the comments of the trolls, acted like an adult, instead she chose to be an opportunistic victim. "someone said mean things to me on the internet GIB MONY PL0X!!1" She's a hypocrite, scam artists, and an intellectual joke. So fucking tired of commenting in this thread.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 06:39 PM
2

Relevance? People are immature dipshits all the time on the internet, what makes her so special, what makers her so better she can't deal with it like an adult and not a spoiled child who demands the world see to her pathetic crying and fucking coddle her. I'm tired of commenting in this thread, fuck off.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 06:37 PM
0

despite getting trolled, crying to the internet, and getting payed 150k for being a victim. Ftfy Normal people would dismiss the trolls and delete their comments, while engaging in debate in good faith with those who disagree respectfully, in other words the opposite of what Anita did. Instead she got attacked by a bunch of immature internet trolls, cried like a pathetic victim and used the opportunity to push her agenda, and when people did give genuine criticism, she shut down all discussion o…
/r/MensRights19/03/13 06:29 PM
4

Well the state says men have to pay child support and that only men can be raped too, so better shut up about that. Unable to consent by what reasoning and logic. Right, because the state said so. False equivalency. Unable to consent by what reasoning and logic. The fact that teenagers are immature and make poor decisions, any adult in that relationship is taking advantage of their naivety. A 30 year old adult having a sexual relationship with a 16 year old is wrong for that reason. It's for sim…
/r/MensRights19/03/13 06:15 PM
-13

We're MEN'S rights activists, the victims of that case will get more than there fair of justice and have plenty of support. So no.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 05:32 PM
-1

With all the attention to rape cases in India lately, and the propagandizing of it all by feminists, this was bound to happen.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 05:25 PM
15

That word count chart is telling.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 05:23 PM
11

Once again, what ever mental gymnastics are necessary to blame men, for everything. But remember gaiz, teh feminisz r on our side!!1 :D
/r/MensRights19/03/13 05:23 PM
12

Statutory rape is described as rape because those 'not of the age of consent' ambiguous as that is, are...well unable to consent therefore raped if sex occurs. Of course I understand what you're saying when you say "someone wanted it", alot of statutory relationships are willing from the perspective of the victim, that doesn't change that an adult taking advantage of a naive teenager is not okay.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 05:14 PM
7

At that point another panel member who was male and also happened to be gay called her out and called her a negligent bitch who knows nothing of gender equality....and then stormed out. Best thing I've read all day. Few things more satisfying than hearing about a bigot getting their comeuppance.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 05:08 PM
26

And No there is no such thing as rape for men. It amazes me how the same people who say this, can also use a term coined for rape of men( in prison). That term being rape culture.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 05:06 PM
5

Nah, but you keep attempting to insinuate that strawman position. (Or is the subtle difference there beyond you?) Look at the record. You're the only one using the r-word like that. The way I read what happened, is that the gaming community messed up, big time! By their own willing actions, they just made themselves look like the exact juvenile amoral violence-desensitized stimulation junkies that Jack Thompson tries to paint them as. Try again. The gaming community as a whole lost a PR battle O…
/r/MensRights19/03/13 05:47 AM
6

I'm pointing out legitimate issues in the Men's Rights Movement. 7 word comment detailing all these legitimate flaws of the MRM. Fuck, you got us man, woe is us woman hating bastards. It's like you people are blinded by hate or something. I seriously can't dispute this, alot of us do hate misandrists and those who openly hate men and dismiss them and their rights. We also tend to hate scummy trolls obsessed with trying to paint us as the schutzstaffel of gender.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 05:38 AM
0

Troll no trolling, troll no trolling!
/r/MensRights19/03/13 05:30 AM
7

When did youtube trolls suddenly represent the gaming community? Strawman much? You're the one insinuating the gaming community is represented by middle schoolers on youtube.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 05:28 AM
10

So she's "a damsel" and "a hypocrite" because She's a damsel because she decided to use getting trolled by kids on youtube to her advantage, she's a woman crying sexism, people tripped over themselves ready to help her, legit claims or not. She's a hypocrite because she's a damsel, yet complains about damseling. I've said this multiple fucking times.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 04:51 AM
6

She got trolled on youtube by immature little kids and used the opportunity to achieve her agenda, paint the gaming community as this hate filled monstrosity, all so she could push her feminist narrative into gaming. I doubt she realized from the start if she went crying to the internet that people would fork over 150 thousand dollars, that doesn't change the fact her basis for claims that the gaming community is sexist is a bunch of trolls on youtube. It also doesn't change the fact the whole r…
/r/MensRights19/03/13 03:51 AM
7

target of a purposeful group campaign, commensurate with a smaller Anon action. It was meant to intimidate her into silence. "12 year old you tube trolls" "Purposeful group campaign by an anonymous group to intimidate her" What? the gaming community messed up, big time! By their own willing actions, they just made themselves look like the exact juvenile amoral violence-desensitized stimulation junkies that Jack Thompson tries to paint them as. You're kidding right? When did youtube trolls sudden…
/r/MensRights19/03/13 03:45 AM
1

She didn't raise anything, she was a no one making lazy videos who got attacked by internet trolls(because that happening is so totally unique to her) who then used the incident to damsel and beg for money from supporters who would thoughtlessly do so. She then waits months to release a video that has been thoroughly torn apart by those who disagree in less than half the time it took for her to make it with 150 thousand dollars. And to top that off her video was condemning the very thing she use…
/r/MensRights19/03/13 12:50 AM
31

It's not that she's a hypocrite Her hypocrisy is the whole being an internet damsel in need of help(read: money), then decrying such things. she's just misinformed and does horrible research. No dispute here.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 10:40 PM
43

Scam artists have gotten away with more. People should have nipped this issue in the bud when Anita came crying to people about trolls, she craves and thrives on attention, deprive her of it. It's practically the driving factor in why she's making these intellectually lazy videos.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 10:29 PM
63

I seriously don't know why anyone bothers to acknowledge that raging hypocrite, she is low hanging fruit.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 09:24 PM
8

In before I like my mutilated prick
/r/MensRights18/03/13 06:43 PM
2

Well, women are physically inferior. True as that it is, I'm a "misogynist" for saying it. Most women can't seriously compete physically against men without training wheels. Rather than facing and accepting this truth, many people prefer to compartmentalize it as men being sexist. There's a reason any major competitive and heavily physical sport is segregated by gender.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 06:38 PM
2

You know its not proper to call a fool like you a social justice warrior. Social justice vigilante is more apt, you don't give a damn about fairness or doing the right thing, for you its about finding an acceptable focus of hate, and criminals are easy prey for a predator like you. Nerdy as it may be the episode of Star Trek TNG comes to mind and the quote from Patrick Stewart's character Mr. Worf, villains who twirl their moustaches are easy to spot. Those who clothe themselves in good deeds ar…
/r/MensRights18/03/13 06:36 PM
4

Link to raging bigot must mean they hate women Even if we hated you for no good reason, its a canyon wide logical leap to say its because of a hatred for women. People like you claim MRAs are full of hate, well you're right, we hate man haters like you, we hate hypocrites, and dishonest bigots.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 06:30 PM
3

The only place women don't have it good is outside the first world, speaking to the first world, women have it better than men by a LONG shot. Practically every woe of first world women can be traced back to their own decisions and desires, something feminists write off as "influence of the "patriarchy"".
/r/MensRights18/03/13 06:27 PM
10

Yet another thing I can't stand about that dogmatic garbage, the constant need to co-opt this or that. Feminism is a fairweather ideology.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 06:25 PM
21

As you've said, the view that women should be relegated to old gender roles as nothing but housewives and baby makers is an INCREDIBLY infamous and unpopular opinion, but our society jumps at the chance to put men in their old antiquated role but with none of the positives of it. Men are only good for two things to alot of people, to be exploited, or blamed.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 06:24 PM
2

Under law X group cannot even be raped, they are not even legally protected from Z crime. Y group: WHY DO YOU FOCUS SO MUCH ON X GROUP OMG You know, despite the fact aforementioned Y group is ALL that's ever talked about practically when it comes to the matter of rape. Tamen_ says delusion is the word that comes to their mind, self serving, selfish, spiteful, hateful, thats what comes to my mind reading that some fucking femicunt thinks there's "too much focus on men about rape". They DAMN sure …
/r/MensRights18/03/13 07:18 AM
0

it is egalitarianism at its core. I'm assuming when you say its "egalitarian" you mean in the same sense the black panthers and malcom X were egalitarian. MRA and such is redundant as feminism covers all of the major mens rights concerns. HOLY SHIT The fuck it does. The MRM exists just for the reason that feminism doesn't give a flying fuck about men, or when it does pretend to give a damn, its half hearted caring and dishonesty, always putting women first, because fuck men. How the fuck did a l…
/r/MensRights18/03/13 07:11 AM
-5

Most won't, especially most who come here. Edit: downvotes, very immature, and very typical of feminists "I don't like what you say, you therefore have no right to say it". Edit2: prove me more right femicunts People think I'm exaggerating, just look at /r/feminism's posting rules. Feminism is a dogmatic hate ideology, fuck you all.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 07:06 AM
-5

I'm a feminist I'd be angry if men did this to a woman, and I'm just as angry at women doing this to a man. You'll have to forgive some of us if we don't believe you.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 02:05 AM
1

The two groups and not equal. You're right they're not, one is a 600 lb emotionally damaged spiteful gorilla that crushes anything or one that gets in its way, the other is after 100 years men decided they got tired of being left out, and ignored. MRM is a reaction movement to feminism. Feminism is a reaction to the patriarchy Imagine that, men ignored and abused enough a movement formed out of necessity. Meanwhile feminism's only reason for existing is convoluted bigoted conspiracy theories. Th…
/r/MensRights18/03/13 01:05 AM
2

It's hard to find middle ground with a group that actively hates you. Hence why MRAs tend to be anti-feminists.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 12:26 AM
1

the article describes a bill that would render sexist AND hateful speech illegal Everyday I thank the god I don't believe in for being born in the LAND OF THE FUCKING FREE(jk...a little bit) and that I can speak my opinion what ever it may be ignorant and foolish or enlightened and noble without fear of being locked up. their comments including a plethora of murder and rape threats against feminists. Given it was against feminists, I would not be surprised to know some group vehemently disagreed…
/r/MensRights17/03/13 04:46 AM
3

The irony of the old famous feminist quote "women need men like a fish needs a bicycle" is that had not ancient man decided it was for everyone's best interests that he see to the safety and well being of women he came into contact with to reproduce, most women, and likely eventually all women would have died easily out in the wilderness on their own as man lived out his existence in solitude until humanity was no more. Women need men, civilized society provides a crutch for women to survive unb…
/r/MensRights17/03/13 04:32 AM
1

Her even using that word seriously makes her a fucking fool.
/r/MensRights17/03/13 04:20 AM
5

Her arguments and "points" aren't worth considering, she's a hypocrite. She is a damsel, who profited from her crying helplessness who then proceeds to complain about that idea.
/r/MensRights16/03/13 11:25 PM
34

Don't you know, decisions women make the accountability of which falls on men. That's not sarcasm that's reality. Men pay the price for decisions women make.
/r/MensRights16/03/13 11:23 PM
11

minority female Not one in the same, at all.
/r/MensRights16/03/13 11:20 PM
1

You should have dropped a weight on his foot as he grabbed them.
/r/MensRights16/03/13 07:06 PM
1

Crime occurs in those area because the people are poor and often discriminated against in some way or another, whether racial or due to their class in that society, not because its perceived for crime to be okay, you have no fucking clue what the fuck you're talking about. Even in the most brutal southwest cali ghetto people know crime is bad, people know gangs are bad, people know stealing, killing, rape, and so on are bad things to do. The only thing remotely similar to a trends of a crime cul…
/r/MensRights16/03/13 05:54 AM
0

Your posts are bad and so are you esan.
/r/MensRights16/03/13 05:50 AM
8

Hi /r/Amr Cool downvote brigade Return the favor http://www.reddit.com/r/againstmensrights/comments/1acylj/halfysreddit_actually_says_the_right_thing/
/r/MensRights16/03/13 05:44 AM
5

"feminists suck my life's not fair I have so many issues" Found your issue you uncle tom. Feminism != women Anti-feminism is not misogyny, kindly fuck off back to twox where you can lick feminist boot without the painful sting of your cognitive dissonance being exposed.
/r/MensRights16/03/13 05:39 AM
7

No brigade going on in this thread. /s
/r/MensRights16/03/13 05:36 AM
3

The second we allow them to control the debate is the second they win. That, and feminists don't fear men, not all of them, most of them more accurately hate men.
/r/MensRights16/03/13 05:34 AM
5

you should define it by citing a direct quotation from a credible source. That's unfortunate seeing as very, VERY few feminists have any credibility.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 07:47 PM
1

The dictionary definition of feminism written by feminists... Lol... This is like how on wikipedia a source for sexual dimorphism in humans that downplays the physical difference between men and women is SHOCKER a feminist source, not an academic one, not a scientific one, a sociopolitical source masqueraded as true.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 07:46 PM
1

(true, non-nazi) feminists http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman
/r/MensRights15/03/13 07:43 PM
2

Rational, that's a funny word for your comments... Piss off troll.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 06:29 PM
3

Anita is a hypocrite, you're a troll, bye.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 06:26 PM
3

Who said anything about making the trolls do anything? Straw man harder.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 06:18 PM
3

i'm saying that someone choosing to write something a certain way is not the same as a similar event happening in real life. They are in fact the same event, the helpless damsel Anita attacked by internet trolls, cries for help, and people responded with pitty for the poor helpless damsel, she then goes on to use what she gained from being a damsel to complain about damseling. Scratch what I said before, she's not ironic, she's a hypocrite.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 06:15 PM
3

What the fuck does that even mean? Anita Sarkeesian is a professional damsel, then uses what she gained from being a damsel to complain about damsels. She embodies irony. That said your response coupled with the fact I appear to have downvoted you before, doesn't seem to be coincidence.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 06:01 PM
2

Why is the damsel in distress trope used so much? Because Sarkeesian is living breathing irony. Help help I'm a woman whose feelings were hurt on the internet god and everyone forks over cash I'm such a victim, damsel in distress tropes are bad...except when its me.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 05:25 PM
7

What has the MRA movement done for the children of Africa? Fuck-all, because that's not the goal of this movement. The MRM doesn't pretend to be egalitarian or that achieving our goals will ensure equality for everyone. "If you support equal rights, you support feminism" is a common co-opting tactic by feminists, we don't suffer the delusion of existing for everyone, feminism does.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 05:22 PM
1

The top comment atm is spot on about it, privilege is a trivial concept, if not often totally irrelevant outside a sociological setting, quit worrying about "privileges" do what you think is right and be happy. No one can or should ask any more of you than that.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 08:08 AM
1

...did you seriously ask us to check your "privilege"?
/r/MensRights15/03/13 07:57 AM
3

It occurs to me that should a man, of any size or physical capability were to rely on cowardly proxy violence the way women do VERY few men would have a problem treating them like shit. It seems all that is required to get away with being a coward is a vag and a pair of tits.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 07:53 AM
1

Good fucking god...
/r/MensRights15/03/13 05:49 AM
23

WTF is going on these days. Less agency, accountability, and responsibility for women, with as many rights and privileges as can be dreamt up. Someone in that position can do just about anything they want.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 12:23 AM
4

Naturally people are quick to forgive a woman about this, one of the few sane comments puts it best If she found stories on your computer about young girls at 6 years old having sex with older men/women, along with pictures of young girls in bathing suits, we know what she'd do. She'd dump you and report you to the police. Leave her.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 11:44 PM
16

Needs a better image, thing is its hard to find an image for a female pedophile because the general public barely even acknowledges the pedophilia of women. Maybe a picture of a teacher...seems to always be teachers...
/r/MensRights14/03/13 11:28 PM
6

Attempt at derogatory language, trying to turn the term 'bro' into a slur of sorts. It also allows them to further "other" men by reffering to them as "bros" and "dudebros". Condescending, petty, subtly contemptful shit.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 10:01 PM
9

"but but gaiz real feminists just want equality patriarchy<sup>TM</sup> hurts men tooooo!!1 ;_;"
/r/MensRights14/03/13 03:39 AM
2

You said it yourself people care about soldiers, not men. The fact most soldiers are men is testament to the indifference to the suffering of men by society.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 01:17 AM
1

Strong sides of both. Violence against men only matters as much as our legal system can be bothered to deal with it. Where as violence against women™ a comparably rare event, is the worst thing since sliced hitler.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 01:16 AM
-4

And as you can imagine every person daring to point out reddit's and society in generals hypocritical reaction to the situation is downvoted.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 01:12 AM
3

More males in disney movies equals oppression obviously...despite most movies being about/catering to a spoiled princess.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 01:00 AM
13

Not paying CS is a felony???? WTF?!!?
/r/MensRights13/03/13 10:50 PM
212

Don't call it "reverse" sexism, sexism is sexism and calling misandry "reverse" implies it flows only one way.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 10:02 PM
1

No, it also takes an acknowledgement that he's talking about all feminists, and not just a specific portion, when he references "real feminists". Using the word "real" in the place of "sexist" does not make this a NTS fallacy Yes it does, this is like arguing is water wet. No true Scotsman is an informal fallacy, an ad hoc attempt to retain an unreasoned assertion. real feminists want equality Regardless of context is NTS. Using the qualifier real to denounce feminists that they don't like as "u…
/r/MensRights13/03/13 09:54 PM
1

I think the phrase you're looking for is "It's a given". Probably, I know what it means but I don't think I've ever seen anyone else use it in writing before for some reason, not that I can recall to write it myself anyway. if you can speak generalizations about feminists without speaking on every single one, so can he. It's not a NTS to clarify which portion of a group you are speaking about, not even if you use the word "real", or "true" to do so. I don't think I said he couldn't speak in gene…
/r/MensRights13/03/13 09:27 PM
2

This is an invalid point. No its not. real feminists The second you apply the label "real" to those whom you like and "fake" to those whom you don't, you invoke NTS. avoid any generalizations about all feminists This statement makes no sense, you can't generalize all of anything or group. When you generalize you say a majority, not all. One can still make a generalization (and generalizations are not hitler, they're not even truly fallacious, a generalization is only fallacious if it is hasty or…
/r/MensRights13/03/13 08:37 PM
1

As convoluted as feminism is, gender roles are a real and verifiable thing, you need to learn to sociology bucko.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 08:03 PM
-1

but just for the record, it's "women's"* That one just went flying over your head. I went to school in London and took seminar classes on philosophy You appear to have slept through them. I am amused at how in one comment you're defending Bush Oh god, there's calling me names then there's this...have some decency. I never defended the mighty C student president, I merely mentioned that people mindlessly blamed him among others for something no one could have really helped. Too many other easy wa…
/r/MensRights13/03/13 06:46 AM
3

I guess you're like the almost PC redneck, close but no cigar. even if it remains an impossibility in your limited mind. Ohh ooh ow, my feels you've hurt them. LOL
/r/MensRights13/03/13 06:11 AM
0

my favorite thing about you is how you quote something I've said, and then state something completely irrelevant and/or insult me. You're projecting. take how you quoted me on voting for Bush, for example. you can't handle the fact that you were wrong And you can't handle that you have bad reading comprehension. the fact that I surprised you by revealing to you that I voted for him Don't flatter yourself, I wouldn't put it past you to vote for a C student president. I graduated with a Master's d…
/r/MensRights13/03/13 06:09 AM
3

manlovingfeminist Oxymoron if I ever saw one.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 06:00 AM
17

real feminists Not commenting on the rest of your comment, but http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman
/r/MensRights13/03/13 05:59 AM
0

I don't hate men, most of my friends are male, I have loving men in my family as well as a loving boyfriend "I don't hate blacks, my best friends are black, and so is my president so that nulls my ignorance." I read you as a pathetic, ignorant, loser piece of shit who is probably upset you're still a virgin. Hilarious, because you have no argument, you've resulted to ad hominem, the part I love the most though, its ad hominem EXTREMELY typical of a misandrist. please stop hiding behind your "big…
/r/MensRights13/03/13 05:51 AM
0

I don't see you discussing Men's Rights, I see you attempting to dissect every fraction of my sentences in order to have them fit your own assumptions about what I've said Oops my bad, I put your words under a critical light and exposed the ignorance. I don't think there's anything wrong with telling women to be careful when they're out; I just don't think there's anything wrong with raising sons who know that raping people isn't an acceptable part of society. You just don't fucking get it do yo…
/r/MensRights12/03/13 10:48 PM
0

no one is saying you're automatically a rapist because you're a man. Half of all feminist propaganda is about portraying men, masculinity, and maleness as aggressive and "rapey". From creep shaming to these "anti rape" campaigns purposefully targeted at men telling them not to rape thus making the insinuation that without someone their to remind them, men just go rape crazy. Oddly enough the only other conversation you hear the term "rape crazy" is about way back when, laws were made to protect …
/r/MensRights12/03/13 10:16 PM
1

As a college aged woman, you are told not to drink, a lot. You are told how to protect drunk friends, you are told to watch your drink, you are told to avoid drunks. I have had hours and hours of it. one person is being raped Because being told to be reasonably careful is literally rape. HAHA, I can't make this shit up, did I accidentally click on /r/tumblrinaction, you can't be serious...
/r/MensRights12/03/13 01:52 PM
2

You got a point.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 08:13 AM
10

If I have to act like an emotionless financial automaton, you better get barefoot, pregnant, and in the kitchen real damn quick.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 07:55 AM
0

I wouldn't call mindless bullshitting "oppressing", even to the extent that society caters to feminist bullshit. Like the title hero oppression gets abused a bit. That said, I'm right there with you.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 07:53 AM
11

Yea well...PATRIARCHHY..and stuff..
/r/MensRights12/03/13 07:51 AM
-1

I know, but it just stands to reason you don't do what got you intro trouble to begin with. AFAICT OP has no intention of staying with her after the abortion, rightfully so, having sex with her and pretending its all ok and nothing has changed as he has told me is him just trying not to let on the fact its his worst nightmare if she doesn't get the abortion.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 05:08 PM
17

As soon as she does have the abortion, dis-thefuck-appear. Get all your shit, your money, everything you own. The fact you had a committed enough relationship with her that at one point she was pregnant with your seed opens you up to ALL kinds of possibilities for her to fuck your life up. That said, use your best judgement, it could be your life(for all practical intent, a financially enslaved person has no life or opportunity) on the line.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 08:08 AM
31

we are still having sex (I know, I know). The part of me that HATES stupid people is telling me you deserve what ever you have coming. It's like someone who drank and drove, almost had a wreck, got really rattled, then fucking did it again. People like you never learn till its too late.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 07:47 AM
5

Makes me ill to see people AGAIN giving feminism a free pass because "no real feminist would do that". I swear to fuck if feminism stopped talking about hating men and made the logical next step of directly hurting/killing men there would still be people like you going "but oh, don't you know those are just man haters "under the guise of feminism"".
/r/MensRights11/03/13 03:38 AM
3

Perhaps you should have circled the Related articles: Boys who watch porn "think sexual harassment is acceptable" Part
/r/MensRights11/03/13 03:36 AM
1

Everything after half the population part was pure self serving lies and bullshit.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 12:05 AM
5

The irony being history is the total opposite. Men putting up with overgrown little girls who couldn't take care of themselves if they tried. Even modern women who are supposedly "independent" are reliant on the government if not to provide for them ensure that a chaotic society doesn't take hold, a society in which women would be crushed underfoot if not only for the curse of inborn "chivalry" in most men.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 12:00 AM
1

How is my theory invalid? It's not like unhappy people trying to ruin the happiness of others is some new bizarre concept I pulled out of my ass.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 09:17 PM
8

This is shallow as fuck, but is it really coincidence sex negative feminists tend to shy away from what society considers aesthetically pleasing? Do these women look like they got much of anything sex related? . . . My theory, they get consistently sexually/romantically rejected, they can't be happy, no one can.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 09:05 AM
5

people just made it up. It isn't a real thing. Can you cite that? Because as far as I can tell they never said it wasn't a thing, they just grouped it into a single umbrella term rather than specifically aspergers, they said The term "Asperger's disorder" will not appear in the DSM-5, the latest revision of the manual, and instead its symptoms will come under the newly added "autism spectrum disorder" Along with a few other changes. Why do you think its not "an actual thing"?
/r/MensRights10/03/13 04:46 AM
9

Your post AND that article's title are misleading, they didn't say "no such thing as aspergers" they just grouped it in with autism on a "spectrum" since its a form of autism. Autism is a wide ranging disorder, from something as simple as aspergers to people who have brains like supercomputers but are as socially acclimated as Tarzan.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 03:13 AM
5

She says she's sorry and it won't happen again. Not to sound like some whining sociology major, but that tends to be what all abusers say "I'm sorry, I'll never hurt you again" does it again later. If this is the first time she's done this, w/e, if it happens again, GET. THE. FUCK. OUT. The legal system in all likelihood can't help you, and will probably paint you as the criminal if it can. If the police are ever called, YOU will be the one arrested, if a matter of DV against you ever went to tr…
/r/MensRights10/03/13 03:08 AM
1

Go eat shit and die troll.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 12:33 AM
3

It just goes back to the old saying the mother of invention is necessity Humans are special in that when we NEED to do something, we do it, we find a way, somehow.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 09:10 PM
-13

I can still appreciate his ability as an actor, despite his warped view on violence. Of course you have to take into account Patrick came from a home in which his father regularly abused him and his mother, so it stands to reason he'll quickly and thoughtlessly take the position that he does. Not that ignoring violence against men is ok, but given his own experience its to be expected.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 09:09 PM
5

And that reminds me of a story about a boy in africa who(its been a while since I heard it so I might be off a bit) turned an old refrigerator and a bit of water into a battery to power his villages only cell phone and connection to the outside world.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 08:55 PM
1

This is the first time I have ever heard this term. It sounds superfluous and silly and should be disregarded in my opinion. I have my doubts that anyone would use this term seriously. www.tumblr.com SRS Just about any feminist on the internet.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 06:15 AM
4

Because we're one of very few groups of people who would criticize them for it, they can get away with it. But you know...Patriarchy™.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 06:08 AM
34

Rebecca Watson, the eternal faux victim.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 05:57 AM
0

Piss off uncle tom.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 05:54 AM
8

Not hating women for starters, as desperately as you wish you could pretend we do.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 05:53 AM
2

Get out of /r/mensrights troll.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 08:46 PM
0

That said the MRM is FAR more unified in what a MRA is than feminism is sure what a feminist is. You're hitting the key point on the head here - feminism is not a single, cohesive, united philosophy. Some feminists, a tiny minority of them, are what you describe. The rest are not. Don't let a single faction of a group - which you yourself state is not unified - represent the whole. And once again it flies right over your head you intellectual cockroach. That 'tiny' minority for all practical int…
/r/MensRights08/03/13 08:45 PM
1

And in both cases you're right, most don't oppose but they are totally indifferent, and when they're not indifferent they are opposed.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 08:38 PM
14

11/19
/r/MensRights08/03/13 06:42 PM
2

I've been part of this community for well over a year now. So a year of tone arguments and policing comments in /r/mr so feminists/men's rights opponents don't get their feelings hurt? You know dick about anything Indeed I do know dick about anything. Are you intentionally trying to not only make yourself look like a concern troll but a fool as well? so please feel free to cram it. Methinks the concern troll is getting bothered. Your tactics and ideas would probably be more appreciated in a plac…
/r/MensRights08/03/13 06:39 PM
1

Why do you think I'm doing this? Because you're a troll, more interested in obsessing over pedantic details to direct attention away from important discourse. Yours is a tone argument, you're more concerned about how something is said than what is actually said. Atleast people like SRS, and radfems are open about their intent to disrupt the MRM, you're much more devious, much worse. I'm just curious why you haven't been banned yet.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 06:32 PM
7

reminds me of the passage from zenpriest's essay about how bigots are made, the particular passage being about how a female friend of his(gf I think) talked about how cathartic it was to go to her little feminist meeting and hate men, how good that felt. Feminism in academia is indoctrination to hate.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 06:05 PM
-5

[Warning: Facebook] HOLY SHIT GAIZ LOOK OUT!!1
/r/MensRights08/03/13 06:01 PM
2

Oh hey look, the concern troll from yesterday...concern trolling AGAIN today! Shocking! :o
/r/MensRights08/03/13 05:59 PM
1

You replied to all that with a strawman? Really?
/r/MensRights08/03/13 05:27 PM
4

I'm not getting this all vaginas are BEAUTIFUL CUS PATRIARCHY garbage. They're not, the average genitalia male or female runs the same gambit of looks as your average person, generally ugly. Beautiful people, and beautiful genitalia are a minority. Part of the goal is noble, people with average and ugly genitalia shouldn't feel bad about it, but pretending your little, cut, and sideways pecker/saggy, hanging roast beef sandwhich is anything resembling beautiful all because you say it is, is pure…
/r/MensRights08/03/13 07:05 AM
6

Look at my beautiful, sexual, liberated poorly photographed vag. EWW PERVY MEN THOSE VAGINAS WEREN'T MADE FOR YOU
/r/MensRights08/03/13 06:56 AM
5

Oh thats nice, you complain about "what will tehy think of uss ;_;", and your next comment is rating my comment on some scale of some kind like you're a fucking /b/tard. Get banned.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 06:39 AM
15

Video of a man assaulted to the point he is brain damaged. GAIZ YOU DONT HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ANGRY, STOP BEING ANGRY, WHAT WILL THEY THINK OF USSS ;_; I have news for you fucknugget, they already don't think much of us, and most never will. Get. the. fuck. out. You fucking concern troll.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 06:34 AM
12

It occurs to me what the event was about, and what happened at the event is INCREDIBLY ironic.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 05:07 AM
23

Judging by how we gain many of our members I don't think ANY feminists are aware of it.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 05:03 AM
22

I love when the MRM begins leaking off the internet and into the real world. The reactions by feminist are SO visceral and rage filled. And of course...we stop being mere armchair activists who talk more than act.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 05:02 AM
1

Is that much better? My point still stands, petty tactics for petty people.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 01:36 AM
1

The idea that I can't oppose an ideology because not every single member holds the exact same opinion is pants on fucking head retarded. Not every christian is a WBC loon, or a zealous politician legislating their views into law, or a nutty fire and brimstone preacher, but I'm still anti-religion. Similar for feminism, the ideology itself and its core tenants are flawed. Also, nice strawman, I've not once said its a black and white issue, but you're desperate to make it seem that way. In fact th…
/r/MensRights07/03/13 11:45 PM
0

It would be easier to type out you're ok with mental gymnastics to deflect criticism against feminism, than type all that out.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 11:21 PM
0

the worst subset of the other group One of many differences between the MRM and feminism, the MRM does not let its most radical and bitter members control the general discourse. Sad to see you've been so quick to let yourself fall into that Take your pity and shove it up your ass.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 10:31 PM
1

It is a bad thing. We're not here to knock women's rights down Feminism is to the rights of women like the KKK is to the rights of white people. That said even going with the assumption feminism sees to the rights of women I can still oppose the ideology behind it without being anti-women's rights. Leave it to an empty headed feminist to connect dots where there aren't even dots though. Some feminists are radicals who do not share this goal. And those same some are usually the only important one…
/r/MensRights07/03/13 10:29 PM
1

Why does it not surprise(hint:I actually know why) me in the same thread in which I'm downvoted for being anti-feminist one of the responses to me is an ad-hominem.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 10:20 PM
1

NY is a blue state and NYC being a major city has GOT TO BE majority liberal, how did this even happen?
/r/MensRights07/03/13 09:24 PM
0

it's just blantant anti-feminism You say that like its a bad thing. If woman hating MRAs tried invading /pol/ and subsequently got their virtual asses handed to them, I would celebrate that too. If you give a damn about the rights of men I suggest you wise up and see feminism for what it is.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 09:19 PM
2

"Bioethics" Boy that doesn't sound ominous AT ALL...
/r/MensRights07/03/13 01:27 AM
-1

I don't know why you were downvoted, its a fact women tend to rely on less direct forms of violence, whether its some deviousness like poisoning or relying on proxy violence. Even here, can't let reality hurt tey wymynz feelings I guess.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 12:38 AM
3

The Republican party doesn't fight every battle that gun owners would like them to fight either, but it's still been effective for them to join up. Half of the population isn't a gun owner, owning a gun is also not an intrinsic part of who and what a person is. We're talking about basic human rights, not civil liberties and privileges, it's all or nothing. The MRM siding heavily with the GOP is trading one devil for another. As ddxxdd brought as well a party who so vehemently oppose an actual ab…
/r/MensRights06/03/13 08:57 PM
6

men's rights is better off being non-partisan. So no real backing or power? Associating men's rights with partisanship would be the opposite of giving it a voice of power. Issues men face would just become more wedge issues and political talking points for a broken system of political discourse. The Left and feminism are so bound up in each other it'll take something massive for them to ever separate. While the Republican party is unlikely to be willing to fight every MRM battle, they'd still be…
/r/MensRights06/03/13 06:19 PM
11

The right has had a hand in men's rights before, it's always proven to been nothing but partisan agenda masked with a faux interest in men. That said a far left leaning MRM would be no better. men's rights is better off being non-partisan.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 06:03 PM
2

Given how these things tend to go, I'd say the OVERWHELMING majority, the few that aren't are the genuine 1 out of a 100 people violent psychopaths.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 06:01 PM
3

Honestly I do personally see a 16 year old dating a 13 year old as...kind out there, 14 not so much. Its just somewhere between 13 and 16 there's a huge maturity gap, for me there was anyway. That said...30 fucking years???? Is this a shady sexual relationship among teenagers or a motherfucking crime against humanity holy shit!!!
/r/MensRights06/03/13 03:58 AM
3

Your "plenty of feminists" also tend to be irrelevant and unimportant in the grand scheme of gender political discourse. The types who hash tag feminist, and share common feminist rhetoric and propaganda on facebook or when asked what they think of equality give the expected socially acceptable answer. It's the raving, hateful loons who rule the roost of feminist discourse, not your "plenty of feminists". I've never seen a modern feminist of note who didn't display atleast one incident of contem…
/r/MensRights06/03/13 01:53 AM
18

Anything feminism has ever "done for men" has just been lipservice to further the illusion feminism isn't a hate movement.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 09:56 PM
8

Nearly every time there's a major riot people immediately start taking advantage of the chaos to get what they want, usually stealing. Nearly every place in the world with little to no structured or functioning society is rife with crime, usually driven by gangs. Humans are too destructive to live in your 'anarchist utopia'. Anarchy does not mesh with reality.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 09:45 PM
10

Where in the fuck did this happen in AR? Bizarre, and fucked up... The suspect was sentenced to a day in detention. Unfuckingacceptable...
/r/MensRights05/03/13 05:54 PM
35

Apparently what you have to say is only valid and worth hearing if you don't feel comfortable in your born body. Feminist logic. Can't make this shit up.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 07:35 AM
1

I have the good(bad too in some ways) fortune of living in the south. People of the kind we deal with here are thankfully few and far between. But there's still alot of traditionalism "women first", "chivalry" type shit here, but most people are level headed.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 08:40 PM
2

I apologize for the rudeness, it's just infuriating to see people conflating two very different things, ideology and sex.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 05:34 PM
3

Given the reality of women's oppression, male privilege, and some men's enforcement of both, it's hardly surprising that EVERY woman should have moments when she resents or even "hates" men.” Sometimes I just feel like giving up. That it all doesn't matter. I hear about issues men face all the time, I hear more about how it doesn't matter. I also hear things that amount to "women have a duty to hate men". And it just makes me want to totally withdraw. More than the desperation and frustration I …
/r/MensRights04/03/13 09:00 AM
3

Wow
/r/MensRights04/03/13 05:08 AM
2

Thanks for saving our lives(LOL NOT REALLY), now gtfo scumbag. Par the course male treatment...
/r/MensRights03/03/13 10:23 PM
22

It's good to see more people standing up to the anti-sex feminists.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 09:58 PM
0

I don't really understand it either. I think the tags are meant to give an indication of what's "trending" or what topic is most popular. It's like if you took facebook and blogging mixed it together and forced the people using it to squeeze down what they're saying in to less than like 64 characters.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 09:57 PM
1

Just checking for a final time, no refutation of anything I've said, just lots of pointless ad hominem? K. Cya kiddo.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 09:30 PM
0

I don't have to play guessing games with you, you're just plain stupid. Have fun with that.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 07:30 PM
34

There are two types of people who are consistently above the law. Police, and women.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 06:45 PM
11

Oh I don't know, the implication that men are just naturally violent animals. It reeks of hate and contempt, quit giving bigots a free pass.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 06:44 PM
2

Lol nice cop out. You can't argue with what I said, so you just baselessly claim my points are "flawed" stamp your feet like a child project immaturity on me, then run away and cry.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 06:36 PM
8

It's funny you bring up animal rights. Feminists tend to treat their pets with more respect than the men in their lives. Let that sink in.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 09:55 AM
6

The biggest fuck you about concern trolls, is they tend to be /r/feminism and /r/againstmensrights regulars.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 07:35 AM
1

Doesn't have to be that way, it starts with a change which i understand might be unrealistic at this time but you need to start stepping towards progress sometimes. There's nothing wrong with striving towards unrealistic and impossible but noble goals. A world without murder. A world without rape. A world without violence. A world without hate or bigotry. It's a moral imperative to strive towards such goals, but the folly is believing you can actually achieve them and zealously ignoring belief t…
/r/MensRights03/03/13 07:34 AM
1

It's late so I'm not thinking totally clearly so I might not be getting the full context but it honestly seems like he's just using that label to shut down the argument with no basis.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 06:59 AM
1

He made the clarification He didn't make a clarification, he made an absolute statement and when called on it, he backtracked and I didn't let him. These two statements Violence is never acceptable i'm not saying we shouldn't fight hitler Are incompatible. or you just look like a troll (and I'm pretty sure you are). Aww that's cute, you don't agree, so I must be a troll. Come back when you don't argue like a teenager.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 06:57 AM
2

Someone who intends to sow seeds of doubt and consent by creating false concern, usually over a non-issue. All Tyrien is doing is taking an isolated incedent in which they were disagreed with and projecting fault on to all of /r/mr. A comment down below analogizes it well. TL;DR Backed into spur of rebar while running backwards at full speed, got butthurt, now I'm accusing the construction company of not being nice to me Tyrien's concern isn't genuine and is simply an attempt at controlling the …
/r/MensRights03/03/13 04:52 AM
1

I obviously need to take a break from the internet for a bit. The stupidity radiating from you and dusty is just awe inspiring. You two are like those people who walk up to a door that you obviously need to pull to open but instead push it, or even more likely you're the types to assume every door is automatic and just walk into motherfucking doors all fucking day. IT'S NOT LIKE THE MOTHERFUCKING BOT DOESN'T LEAVE A LINK EXLPLAINING WHY AND HOW IT DOES WHAT IT DOES!! BUT INSTEAD HUURR "WHY BOT D…
/r/MensRights03/03/13 03:36 AM
2

A matter of yanking the knife out covering it in salt then sticking it back in. Fuck this society.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 03:29 AM
1

It's called inferring. If we didn't do it then a large amount of everyday conversation would be nonsense. Wtf does inferring have to do with anything. There's nothing to infer it was a simple statement. Violence is never acceptable There's nothing to infer other than exactly what it says. Unless humanmob decides to further clarify his statement you're just misrepresenting what he said by pretending there's some deeper meaning to a simple 4 word statement. You say you have a vote in whether you g…
/r/MensRights03/03/13 03:00 AM
3

HumanMob obviously meant that we shouldn't kill in terms of situations that apply to us. No he didn't. Violence is never acceptable His only constraint is it doesn't matter who the victim or perpetrator is. We wouldn't be making a decision to go to war. Depends where you live. Speaking from the US perspective yes WE do. Or atleast thats how its supposed to work. Violence and murder may be a part of human nature but in no way is that a valid justification for it. I never said anything about justi…
/r/MensRights03/03/13 02:46 AM
1

The fact feminists have such a habit of immediately relating something as innocuous as genitalia to violence and dominance speaks to their contempt for anything male, and their HEAVY positive bias to anything female. Bigots through and through.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 01:44 AM
4

Ok, i'm not saying we shouldn't fight hitler, Violence is never acceptable, no matter who's the victim/perpetrator. Yes you did. but average day to day people who aren't committing genocide shouldn't be met with violence. "average day to day people" don't normally involve themselves in situations where the result is violence, at that point its easy to say they stop being classified as "average day to day people", they tend to be criminals, cops, soldiers, fight sport athletes, or just someone wh…
/r/MensRights03/03/13 01:32 AM
13

Fuck all of you, you're all batshit and cannot understand a world beyond black and white, us or them. You guys bitch about wanting equal treatment but cannot do so without bitching about women getting better treatment. Do I even need to address how stupid this is. Seriously. If this subreddit really wanted equality then it wouldn't focus on labelling feminists feminists and citing how feminists are crazy, irrational, or work to suppress the rights of men. It would focus on how society as a whole…
/r/MensRights02/03/13 10:30 PM
3

Quit cluttering our sub with your concern trolling garbage. I prefer misandrists/feminists who openly hate men as opposed to snake in the grass types like you. DIAF
/r/MensRights02/03/13 10:28 PM
17

That's a VERY naive opinion.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 10:12 PM
7

I'm a subscriber to both [5] /r/MensRights and [6] /r/againstmensrights. Yea I'm calling concern troll. A regular poster to /r/feminism, and /r/againstmensrights takes issue with men discussing their rights. Shocking. Why don't you fuck off.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 10:09 PM
3

Take a stroll by /r/tumblrinaction, the crowd of people feminists identify with wear mental illness like a badge of honor.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 07:55 AM
3

You dropped this '/s'. I hope.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 11:32 PM
7

You know what feminists call a "patriarchal" society, one in which a physically developing female child after being mutilated does not meet the standards of physical attractiveness demanded of them and is subsequently punished for it. That would be par for the course of that bizarre sociologically bastardized thinking. Except it's not a female child, it's male, and few if anyone(being us) even gives a damn...because he's male.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 11:30 PM
3

The dangers of extreme bureaucracy and zealotry with which people try(and often fail miserably) to protect children in our society.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 11:27 PM
8

It's not code, there's no conspiracy feminism is inherently anti-male, no one is hiding that fact.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 02:08 PM
0

Cunt.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 04:27 AM
9

A greater thing to point out in art, or as is the case here gaming. When you play a violent videogame the enemies you wade through slaughtering with out a second thought are rarely female.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 04:24 AM
2

Most people might disapprove but I think you did the right thing. What people forget is marriage is a legally binding(fucking why???) social contract that has a huge impact on your life from then on, even if you get a divorce later the marriage can still affect your life, pretty negatively if you're a man. These days marriage is just like going on another date to people. I mean in this country(US) we have drive thru weddings... I understand we have a cultural obsession with 'McDonaldization', bu…
/r/MensRights26/02/13 06:00 PM
8

The discourse ends there, I tell them to fuck off and stop being intellectually dishonest. I'm not going to waste my time with garbage like that.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 06:39 AM
9

You're forgetting some of the 'best' ones. "If life is to survive on this planet, there must be a decontamination of the Earth. I think this will be accompanied by an evolutionary process that will result in a drastic reduction of the population of males." --Mary Daly, former Professor at Boston College, 2001. "The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race." -- Sally Miller Gearhart, in The Future - If There Is One - Is Female. "The more famous an…
/r/MensRights26/02/13 06:36 AM
21

"anti-masculinism" Misandry: : a hatred or contempt of men — mis·an·dry
/r/MensRights26/02/13 04:28 AM
-1

My bet, MacFarlane took a shot at shithead feminists on comedic level the average person could relate to, and this is her way of getting back at him. Petty opinion article is petty.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 12:53 AM
2

Masculism isn't headed that way, it is that way.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 12:51 AM
-18

As in he means the reality of DV. Not the woman on a cross self pitying victim shit spoon fed to society at large.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 12:48 AM
7

Apparently its not that up to date.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 12:47 AM
3

Thank you.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 05:51 AM
1

Yea, don't drag science down into that inky black pit of ignorance with you shit stain. That said, I'm sure since science says it you can back it up....I'll wait.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 02:30 AM
2

Even when feminism does something 'good' it is marred by their action/inaction. The right to vote for women was gained with none of the responsibility that surrounds it, the draft. Even today only now are people entertaining the idea women should be held to the same standard in that regard. When feminism isn't mindless self interest, its about hurting men.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 02:28 AM
1

Just to be clear, how what is an issue?
/r/MensRights25/02/13 01:15 AM
6

Educational video for human male castration. This is my first video posted here. Just for some background on myself, I'm in school now working on becoming a veterinarian. I've neutered quite a few animals now, and have used this experience to castrate a willing male friend of mine. He's never been happier to be free of his hormones. I have first hand experience knowing that men are better off without their testicles. My violent brother lost his in an accident, and there was a HUGE change - no mo…
/r/MensRights25/02/13 01:10 AM
2

Regarding the last part of the video, the picked a shitty location for a liberal state response. A major difference between the north and south is how people perceive what is their business. In a place like new york you could end up in a fistfight for looking someone in the eye the wrong way passing down the street, so people mind their business and keep to themselves. Where as in a place like Texas, the video really demonstrates how it is down here. The older generation aren't really friendly w…
/r/MensRights25/02/13 01:04 AM
0

If I'm interpreting this right, its incredibly ironic.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 12:56 AM
1

Starting from a position that women are the only disadvantaged one, it is ridiculous to suggest men extensive help. Somewhere inside your mind on the plains of your brain, under the sky of your skull idealism and realism/practicality are clashing. Idealism is winning. You're doing some MAJOR mental gymnastics thinking feminism has anyone but women's well being at heart. Feminism has had more than 100 years to help women, and as they often say eventually help men, in 100 years they never stopped …
/r/MensRights25/02/13 12:54 AM
3

Nearly every good sized apple out of your analogous tree has been rotten to the core, the only not rotten apples in that tree are tiny and unimportant. If I had my way I'd demolish the goddamn worthless fucking tree with a fucking bulldozer. Also, if you remove the roots of a tree, the tree dies. You're imagining "good apples" in some desperate idealistic attempt to salvage the remains of a hate movement.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 12:43 AM
2

What the fuck? I'm not even following this retarded non-sense? People men/women are kittens? I don't even...
/r/MensRights25/02/13 12:39 AM
3

for example the abortion debate being represented as a question of wanting to oppress women when it is really a debate over whether a fetus is a person or not. The abortion debate is often oversimplified because both sides want desperately to win it. If abortion was a simple matter with a simple solution we wouldn't be talking about it still in 2013. Also, you give feminists to much credit, their actions indicate exactly what they think about "equality" for them its just a buzzword to really peo…
/r/MensRights25/02/13 12:38 AM
1

Accepting GM but, condemning infanticide is cognitive dissonance. Irreversible, unnecessary, barbaric harming of others, is just that.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 12:23 AM
3

No thanks.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 12:20 AM
1

Because what you quoted isn't talking about prebirth. after birth it is a living breathing conscious human child. That's infanticide, full stop.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 09:25 PM
14

It is hysteria, the people opposed to us on reddit amount to a bunch of emotionally damaged privileged suburban white kids desperate to be offended on behalf of people they've had limited real world interaction with. If someone is stalking you on reddit, report it to the admins, it's one of the few things they take seriously. People disparaging men's rights and slandering the MRM is NOT new, in fact its been feminist and traditionalist modus operandi for dealing with us since day one. The fact o…
/r/MensRights24/02/13 07:49 PM
1

You know what. Why am I even talking... That's a great point, since you sound like a fucking idiot.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 07:47 PM
1

Uhhh no, there is a HUGE distinction there. A 'baby' inside the womb is a fetus, or that's how people think of it, after birth it is a living breathing conscious human child. Arguing against "post birth abortion"(fuck it I'm calling it what it is)Infanticide does not support arguments against actual abortions.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 07:46 PM
2

Abortion after birth? Well there's already a term for that, its called infanticide. After the fetus/baby has popped out of the women, this isn't even up for debate, no one has ANY right to kill it, and while we're talking about it, no one has any right to disfigure the bodies of others after birth(GM).
/r/MensRights24/02/13 07:43 PM
2

Rugby is how American football is supposed to be played! Lol. No ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights24/02/13 07:39 PM
4

Men don't die younger because of something wrong with society. Between what Eryemil said, and the concept of male disposability, your ignorance harms your support for the rights of men. Educate yourself. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vp8tToFv-bA Edit: judging by your further comments Educate yourself. Was time wasted typing.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 07:24 PM
7

The place that takes up a quarter of your screen every fucking time you're on a /r/mensrights page. The r/MensRights Sphere These subreddits are officially supported by the r/MensRights moderation team. /r/MensRights /r/MensRightsMeta /r/MRSelfPostCopies Related Subreddits /r/MensRightsLinks /r/MRRef /r/MensRightsLaw /r/MRActivism /r/LadyMRAs /r/FeMRA /r/MensRants Need help? Domestic violence links Divorce links False accusation links Do not trust legal advice given by Redditors. If you are in n…
/r/MensRights24/02/13 07:22 PM
5

Don't take it so personally. I'm not supposed to take a devaluing of my life personally? You are way to quick to draw the blame to a conspiracy of feminists. He/she is asking "what is the problem" to be snarky, look at the comment history on that one. I don't think it's to slight men, I think he/she just makes those kinds of comments to questions he/she does not like. Sooo pretty much a standard feminist response, the infamous "wat about teh menz" tripe, meant to undercut the suffering of men. B…
/r/MensRights24/02/13 07:17 PM
3

You seriously asked in a forum dedicated to the rights of men whether men who wish the violation of the rights of baby boys shouldn't be scorned for it? GM is often the very first violating of a man's rights that happen to him in his life, its the harbinger for all the harm that will be done to him in his life in the name of male disposability, and you just want to pretend its a non-issue? GO FUCK YOURSELF
/r/MensRights24/02/13 02:09 AM
-2

You and I both know that I can't really stop you from being a bigotted idiot You can't be 'bigoted' against ideologues and zealots. Shitlam is not something you're born with, its a cult people are indoctrinated into. There is a difference between being critical of a religious philosophy "religious philosophy" there's an oxymoron if I've ever seen one. A philosophy is a well thought out logical view of the world or how one perceives it, often constructed into a well recognized school of thought. …
/r/MensRights24/02/13 12:40 AM
-1

Once again, quit crying and do something about it. It occurs to me that its ironic how being anti-islam is unnaceptable in a place where anti-feminism is celebrated, I'm not berating anyone for being anti-feminist I am as well, but its hypocritical. Islam throughout its history is responsible for a great more suffering than feminism could hope to inflict on men, yet somehow what I say is deplorable. Shitlam along with its two other cousin cults are a cancer on humanity, anyone who would willingl…
/r/MensRights23/02/13 10:10 PM
-2

'circumcision' is WRONG, its a violation of basic human rights, its barbaric, how the fuck do you expect to be treated when you support something like that. Just fuck off out of here, you don't belong.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 10:09 PM
1

You can always count on cuntban to defend even the most obviously misandrist people. Why do you even fucking come here anymore, just fuck off already, get banned, die in a fire, I don't care just fuck off, you miserable man hating misandry-apologizing piece of fucking shit.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 09:20 PM
2

Saying anti-feminist Isn't pro-equality is like saying anti racism is anti equality. Feminism is pure hate and supremacy.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 09:16 PM
64

You know what I always hear women say "Man I wish I had a hard labor blue collar job, there's not enough women in those jobs". Oh wait....
/r/MensRights23/02/13 09:10 PM
-3

If you're pro circ, you're not an MRA, you're a baby genitals chopping piece of human shit. And you should completely disassociate yourself from the MRM. The downvotes are a subtle hint, you're a piece of shit.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 09:08 PM
3

I do have to admit, growing up in the south every Crystal I've known was trailer trash.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 08:50 PM
-2

Then do something about it. Fuck shitlam. I don't have to apologize for hating a group of people who willingly join said group.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 08:46 PM
-8

I can tolerate shitlam, I don't have to like their evil overgrown cult.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 03:49 AM
-16

I'll preface this with the fact I don't hide the fact I can't stand the cult of shitlam. It's the less mentally developed third cousin in the trio of terror that is Abrahamic religions. It wasn't that long ago, and even still now I don't doubt alot of neighborhoods with muslim immigrants in France I believe it was were having issues with threats coming from those immigrants directed at other French citizens, usually death and rape IIRC. I'm not saying all the shitlamists are shitheads, but they …
/r/MensRights23/02/13 01:23 AM
10

It is. As well as a HEAVY dose of cognitive dissonance.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 04:12 AM
5

You have no problem with the gender wage gap. Why would I take issue with something that doesn't exist. You insist that it’s a scientifically proven fact that men are stronger than women. That would be because...oh I don't know..it is. Second time today typing this out, but REALITY DON'T REAL! You believe that the age of consent is unfair and that there’s nothing wrong with having sex with teenage girls. I don't know about other MRAs but I know the age of consent is really often just an arbitrar…
/r/MensRights22/02/13 03:49 AM
-4

U gaizzz dis aint reel feminism, dontcha know feminism iz ekwality!!1
/r/MensRights22/02/13 03:21 AM
18

From that thread. It's not really feminism. It's man-hating disguised as feminism. Feminist philosophy class at a college, a college, a place where feminism has flourished...and its not "real feminism". http://i.imgur.com/pZCDwdG.gif There is nothing on this motherfucking miserable planet more fucking infuriating.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 03:20 AM
5

Which is exactly why when you mix law and medicine you make a monster.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 01:45 AM
8

Different country different culture and laws. Yea that whole "but its their culture" defense is asinine beyond belief. I don't give a fuck about their culture, no person should be assaulted and arrested all for asking someone on a date.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 01:43 AM
100

The key to this is that, in fact only a few feminists believe this. The rub though, is those few feminists often have the biggest say in the policy direction of feminism. Catharine Mackinnon for example.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 11:38 PM
1

is everyone screaming at Professional video gaming teams for not having women on the team? Yes actually, the feminist game of hypoagency doesn't stop at the workplace.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 05:49 PM
18

The most hilarious thing about situations like this. Is you will NEVER hear feminists screeching there aren't enough female sanitation workers, or ditch diggers, miners, basically any job you would see on the show dirty jobs, they NEVER have, and never will. Because equality in the work place actually means "we want more women running companies, let the males do the grunt work" Sums it up perfectly.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 05:48 PM
4

Can't say I'm fond of the concept of co-opting another rights movement, that's part of what made feminism the monster it is today. But I can definitely see the argument for MRAs fighting for the rights of gay men. They're rights are infringed upon based off sexuality, not gender, but they're still men, and thats all I need to know.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 06:33 AM
5

He has a bit of a point, traditionally roled societies tend to do well and in practicality, are efficient. But humans aren't cogs, society isn't a machine, its an organism, and like most intelligent organisms it has self interest.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 06:29 AM
3

Seems unnecessary tacking that on.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 05:13 AM
3

What's MHRA, I missed this. Though I have the unfortunate feeling its a MR GMP type of thing.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 05:07 AM
2

Godwin: The nazis probably had some good points with socialism. I'll spoil it for you, anyone who responds to criticisms with PMs with LOL U MAD FAGGOT Over and over, doesn't have points worth listening to, atleast not from them.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 04:52 AM
5

Try responding to them in a negative fashion. stop spamming and you'll quickly see why. That and the guy behind it seems to only be interested in getting people to buy some kind of merchandise from him, on top of the fact they're indeed misogynist.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 04:40 AM
19

Unfortunately I doubt that would work, even if it is satirical. Another major difference between men and women is the defining of what a man is is constantly used as a weapon/changing. Women only ever had to worry about "not being women" if they were a little too butch, their feminity is rarely in question, the very opposite for men. And in the case of men your whole life can depend upon how "manly" you are to others.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 01:06 AM
2

Fine parenting/ "friending" she's doing there. I'm sure some grody random strip bar whores are the perfect gift for a sweet 16. Good god...there is so much wrong with this woman.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 01:03 AM
2

Think of the term Uncle Tom, apply it to gender. Apologize for nothing.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 01:02 AM
2

I'm so sick of seeing dipshits like you conflating women and feminists. i·de·ol·o·gy /ˌīdēˈäləjē/ Noun A system of ideas and ideals, esp. one that forms the basis of economic or political policy: "the ideology of republicanism". sex [seks] noun either the male or female division of a species, especially as differentiated with reference to the reproductive functions. Educate yourself you fucking moron.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 12:48 AM
2

These "scientists" you say who've proved anything are on par with the "christian scientists". Answers pulled out of their ass. GM does not prevent HIV, it does not prevent spread of STDs, and the cleanliness thing is a moot point, we don't live in the dark age, people have running water. All GM does is unnecessarily mutilate the genitals, remove MANY sensory nerves in the genitals dulling the pleasure of sex, and sometimes it kills the infants it is practiced on. Its barbaric at best, inhumanly …
/r/MensRights21/02/13 12:41 AM
1

It does tend to be faster to message the mods, my guess one of them sets up some specific time to check the report queue, and they might not always get the comment, I'd imagine there's alot of people who just hit the report button out of rage.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 11:15 PM
2

You're full of shit, the "science" behind pro circ arguments is pseudoscience, and has been disproven time and time again. GTFO /r/mensrights you GM supporting POS.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 11:14 PM
3

overwrought, emotionally loaded, fact-free, science-free opinion. Irony, thy name is NikKnack.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 11:00 PM
5

Protip: if you support mutilating the genitals of baby boys at birth, you never had any honest interest in the rights of men and boys to begin with. Also, MRAs aren't the only ones who oppose GM, people are waking up, people realize its not necessary to mutilate the genitals of children to appease imaginary friends, people realize its not necessary to mutilate the genitals of children for reasons that are convoluted at best. Thankfully less men than ever are circumcised these days, yours is a dy…
/r/MensRights20/02/13 10:53 PM
9

The very fact a man ever needed permission from a woman to make a choice about his body is testament to the fact 'patriarchy' theory is the most nonsensical bullshit anyone has ever come up with since bigfoot.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 10:10 PM
1

He's also kind of full of himself iirc.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 10:07 PM
3

It doesn't matter if you agree with it, GM is wrong, full stop. The fact you think the mutilation of the genitals of newborns is even up for debate is the symptom of a sick mind. Unsubscribing to Men's Rights. Believe me, you won't be missed.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 09:48 PM
1

More accurately its a disregard for men and contempt. Contempt in that they often purposefully ignore men, and well, the disregard explains itself.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 06:59 AM
8

And the MRM would be doing men no favor if we ignored one of the more atrocious inequalities facing men, the fact we're mutilated at birth, a process that is praised and hailed as 'good'. There is something wrong with you. Genital mutilation is not ok.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 06:52 AM
21

Imagine for a moment an adult man obsessed with a female teenage popstar had a pair of her panties and was showing it off on a show hosted by an older gay man and an audience of middle aged men went wild when they found out whose and what it was. Then imagine virtually no one took issue with that. Just sounds bizarre doesn't it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_standard
/r/MensRights20/02/13 02:08 AM
1

I put just a little more faith in my US history professor than I do a stranger on the internet, thanks though.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 01:25 AM
1

If its some kind of satire, all some big joke, its the best poe on the internet and the most drawn out instance of facetiousness the world has ever seen. If you want to really know more about them /r/srssucks likes to make fun of their bizarrely autistic antics.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 01:23 AM
9

An SRS'er...unsurprising.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 09:36 PM
4

My point is not that I can somehow single-handedly change the opinions of every radical feminist. Only that I am someone who identifies as a feminist and I see your point and would much rather work with you to correct those injustices you face that our society as whole tends to ignore than against you to push an agenda that satisfies only women. While not in severity, this is analogous to saying you're a member of the KKK who doesn't like the widely held opinions of your group but still want to …
/r/MensRights19/02/13 08:15 AM
0

feminism shouldn't be about women's issues, it should be about gender issues. It's been a long, tiring, but good monday. I don't want to write a long drawn out wall of words to tell you how stupid, idealistic, and wrong you are so I'll return your TL;DR with a TL;DR(Edit: I might have lied a bit) You're an idealist, you don't see reality, you don't think or act practically. You're like the stereotypical hippie who whines that "Why can't we all just get along man". In an ideal world, yes feminism…
/r/MensRights19/02/13 08:07 AM
1

I'm not ignorant of the extent of slavery throughout human history, in fact I never said anything about that particular institution of slavery being the only one. If you live in the US, African slavery in the Americas may as well be the only one that exists. Because in the US, outside some kind of world history class that particular instition of slavery is the only to come up when talking about the topic of slavery.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 07:32 AM
1

You said slavery, thats fairly vague, and in most contexts that tends to mean American slavery of Africans.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 07:22 AM
8

The worst case scenario in marriage for men is their lives are ruined, they're financially enslaved, they lose all parental rights, and so on. All because they put a ring on someone's finger and started living with them. The risk IS. NOT. WORTH. IT. If that wasn't bad enough we've got people pushing laws these days to force people into a marriage if they've just been living together for a certain amount of time. Marriage is not for men. It's the biggest and most common pitfall men face in our so…
/r/MensRights18/02/13 02:49 AM
3

How do you expect to have halfway intellectually motivated conversations when you lack reading comprehension. Just eat shit you troll.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 02:42 AM
1

racism wasn't at the root of slavery ...yes it was Pre-revolutionary colonial farmers needed slavery to work their large farms, but slavery in England was a no no, it was looked down on so to facilitate the need for workers they abanonded their past morals using racism as reason to use slaves brought from Africa in the Triangle trade. Need for people to work farms in North America played a role in slavery, racism however was the reason it happened, racism was in fact at the root of slavery.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 02:29 AM
3

Once again you're conflating women and feminists. Dworkin was a man hating ideologue first, woman second, as important as her womanhood was to her being a man hating ideologue, though being a man hating zealous ideologue isn't unique to women, alot of male feminists out there after all. Quit inventing strawmen and get back to me.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 02:27 AM
7

I know that ramifications for divorce are currently very high for men paranoid about the consequences of marriage. Does not compute.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 02:24 AM
2

Andrea Dworkin worked with lawyer and feminist Catharine Mackinnon among others during the 80s and 90s creating and enforcing misandrist policy the effects we see today, people like them are responsible for the thinking that inspired things like VAWA. Feminists like her shaped the policy of feminism during that time, and by extension that of society, you know, since disagreeing with a feminist makes you a misogynist pig. Frankly though I don't think your assessment stems from ignorance, but a de…
/r/MensRights18/02/13 02:11 AM
-2

No one has said anything about women, we're talking about feminists, particularly the ones who matter, the ones who influence social policy. Andrea the pig Dworkin was one of those feminists. Feminism for all practical intent is oligarchical. The radicals tend to be the ones who matter. Frankly though I don't think your assessment stems from ignorance, but a desire to demonize the MRM, pretend we're all a bunch of woman hating patriarchs or some shit.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 11:10 PM
2

A prenup is an agreement the judge has no right throwing it out because someone wants to backtrack later, if thats the case there's no goddamn point in the prenup. Legitimate reasons for throwing out a prenup would be deception or violating some anal bureaucratic rule, not because one of the agreed parties doesn't want to be held accountable. Change has to start somewhere and gender bashing isn't going to help anyone. It starts when people take the time educate each other. Hopefully in a nice, n…
/r/MensRights17/02/13 08:30 PM
3

Pre-nups can easily be thrown out by a judge.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 08:15 PM
2

Take a look around this sub, modern marriage is a universal risk for men. The frequency of marriage screwing over men is fairly irrelevant, its a risk ALL men face, women rarely face the brunt of the negatives of marriage.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 07:32 PM
1

Its not a matter of "seeing it that way", its the reality of the situation.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 07:22 PM
18

I don't see this as a gendered issue per se. Are you fucking kidding me? Every time we hear about one of these acid attacks its ALWAYS about some man who attacked some woman, only after people actually look into it themselves do they realize a third of the victims are men, they assume its some kind of violence against women™ situation. This was a gendered issue long before we came along.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 07:19 PM
9

It's not pessimistic, its realistic. Modern marriage for men is just setting yourself up to be abused by the state and your female spouse.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 07:14 PM
26

But seriously, the worst fucking people decide to marry each other for the worst possible reasons. Stupid, ignorant people view marriage as a solution to their relationship, social, economic, and self esteem problems. Marriage isn't supposed to be a solution, it's supposed to be a natural evolution in a relationship. QFT The most accurate portrayal of modern marriage barring the misandrist legal trappings of it.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 07:12 PM
2

It really speaks to the desperation of people like this that they make up such absurd unfounded accusations.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 07:09 PM
-2

I love to hate SRS, but this isn't the sub for it. Piss off with your cluttering the front page OP.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 06:51 PM
9

in disguise I'm sorry, but are you fucking retarded OP? SRSwomen stands for shitredditsayswomen you dipshit.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 06:51 PM
21

He was having protected sex with her under the impression she was the one ensuring against pregnancy, she deceived him, and he pays the consequences for it? I'm getting this right? He's being severely punished for trusting someone he was romantically involved with, and that's just ok with you? If you're making "over 6 figures" it's really not that big a deal. The amount a person makes does not make the financial leeching of another any better or more acceptable a thing.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 12:27 AM
14

This is why MGTOW is a thing, men having a relationship, especially romantic with women in our society run the risk of ruining their lives.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 12:25 AM
141

I feel like I was manipulated into this. There is no 'feel' to it, you were. She has already said that she will ask for child support Fuck her. I have no power in this situation and feel like I am getting fucked over. Again, no 'feel' to it. But I really don't know what my options are. Beg her to abort it? Try to get full custody of the kid (she is not fit to be a mother AT ALL)? Just prepare to pay child support for 18 years? Get legal help NOW!! Do not let her know what's up though. Best you c…
/r/MensRights17/02/13 12:20 AM
4

To add to, babies have been known to die because of the procedure, most often the baby goes into shock during the procedure, doctors tend to be payed outright a fee for MGM so they have a conflict of interest regarding medical health and their own greed, its antiquated and barbaric.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 09:58 PM
-5

HER being worried of unwanted male attention is nothing short of extreme narcissism. Reminds me of that man hating pig Dworkin.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 09:55 PM
3

Mental issues has never stopped the system from packing US jails full of mentally incompetent people. A majority of prisoners in fact have some kind of psychological disorder, her having a vagina should not stop the system from treating her like they do men.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 09:54 PM
4

Maybe before ridiculing all women What? Where exactly did I "ridicule all women"? it seems like not many females have ever talked to you. Redditcansuckmycock said it best, you should work out your own issues with men before pretending you give a damn about their rights. As to what I qouted before this, feminism is an ideology, not a gender, feminism is not women, women are not feminism. Your frustration with discussion in this sub stems from your own issues.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 09:43 PM
3

We are anti-feminist for the very reason we listen to "the other side of the argument". "Romance is rape embellished with meaningful looks." -Andrea Dworkin "Under patriarchy, no woman is safe to live her life, or to love, or to mother children. Under patriarchy, every woman is a victim, past, present, and future. Under patriarchy, every woman's daughter is a victim, past, present, and future. Under patriarchy, every woman's son is her potential betrayer and also the inevitable rapist or exploit…
/r/MensRights16/02/13 08:24 PM
2

Right now the second highest link in /r/mensrights is about a man who was raped, then financially enslaved to the state to give his rapist monthly amounts of money. If you didn't get mad reading about the things this sub reports on, there would be something VERY wrong with you.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 08:05 PM
1

Several billions of dollars a year huge. That would be the film industry side of porn itself, including all the money they make selling sex toys, at conventions, etc. If you take into account internet porn, phone sex operators, stripping, and prostitution, that all likely tacks on quite a bit. It would be very convenient for them when accounting for 'the pay gap' to not include an industry in which women make more than twice that of men.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 07:42 PM
0

Meta topic, for a meta sub. Anyone interested in the going on of policy of the sub should and would browse that slow moving sub from time to time, anyone not doing so has no one to blame but themselves for keeping themself out of the loop.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 07:29 AM
2

hetero-sexual relationships become a "Legal liability" for American men. What's this 'become' stuff? They already are.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 07:23 AM
8

resolving inequalities that men face hating feminists One in the same. Could you point to even a single work of serious legal scholarship written by a self-identified MRA that challenges laws like this? Given in a power comparison, the MRM pales to the bullish gorilla that is feminism, no I can't.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 07:20 AM
0

unreasonably strict definition of rape. Funny, I'm sure serial murderers and rapists say the same thing about the strictness of law, tells you something about the thinking of people like this. The police wouldn't consider what your ex did to you rape That might be you know, BECAUSE ITS NOT, YOU FUCKING PSYCHOTIC BITCH.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 07:15 AM
17

Godwin: There were even a few 'good' nazis, Schindler.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 07:11 AM
0

Nahhhhhh. Fuck him.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 05:09 AM
1

Bull. shit. The porn/sex industry is HUGE, no way in hell its too small for them to account for.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 04:58 AM
164

So, he will be financially raped, after being actually raped. Patriarchy™
/r/MensRights16/02/13 04:57 AM
1

Telling young boys that they are monsters that need additional education to suppress their barely contained demand to beat women ISN'T GOING TO HELP ANYTHING. It will lead to more depression, and will thus make them more prone to lash out violently or to become suicidal. That's the point.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 02:56 AM
3

"but you don't know the full story, you misogynist pig!!" /s
/r/MensRights16/02/13 02:36 AM
0

Wow, I'm surprised at the lack of subtle agenda in the poster. Things people deem to be "good" tend to have some glaring little flaw somewhere.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 02:33 AM
3

That tends to be feminist modus operandi, the recently discussed Anita Sarkeesian for example, she disabled comments on every video but the one she used to make her self into a faux victim.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 02:13 AM
2

GF 'banned' him from using(any word at all) certain words shouldn't automatically be assumed to be a feminist slam to avoid discussion. Sounds pretty feminist to me.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 11:13 PM
6

They got old after having long healthy careers and became bitter spinsters...at 30.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 11:02 PM
4

No man really likes to hear the phrase "man up" so I won't phrase it that way, grow a fucking back bone. Banned me from using gender specific words to prove her point. She 'banned' you?? Are you in a relationship with her or are you a commenter on an internet forum? The best way of dealing with female chauvinism, is to let them know that shit does not fly. Best advice, get the fuck out of that relationship, and maybe read a self help book on standing up for yourself. A woman calling you sexist f…
/r/MensRights15/02/13 10:52 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter