Thin_Display_8204 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Male disposability is a human right, apparently I’m glad you’re trying to understand instead of just dismissing me. But I’ve come to realize after posting the original comment that I’m not prepared to communicate my ideas the precision needed. There are flaws in my worldview, such as me underestimating the importance of culture and environmental changes. I don’t understand how human natural incentives change in different behaviors. The problem isn’t what I’m trying to say, it’s my inability to read the context of the situation and accurately …	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	24/06/25 07:51 AM
3	Male disposability is a human right, apparently Should I delete my original comment? I’m not trying to justify male sexual disposability. I’m explaining why it exists. Im explaining that a large part of it is embedded in human biology. But I think everyone is interpreting that I actually hate myself and want men to be sent to war and die. I know im being fatalistic, but that doesn’t mean that im saying that male disposability shouldn’t be eliminated or mitigated. I’m not even saying it’s impossible. I’m saying that the fixing it means address…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	23/06/25 07:09 PM
-2	Male disposability is a human right, apparently I wasn’t justifying inequality I was explaining why it exists in the first place. If you read my previous posts I’ve said that the existence of something doesn’t justify it. Men don’t care about each other, and neither do women, because of male sexual disposability. Male sexual disposability causes hypergamy, which causes male intra-sexual completion. Male intra-sexual competition results in male dominance hierarchies where low status men get exploited by high status men and women. Men don’t car…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	23/06/25 03:04 PM
-14	Male disposability is a human right, apparently I looked it up I can’t find it. Maybe I shouldn’t have said “all” but in most species males are more sexually disposable than females. Can you provide sources to the contrary? I asked ChatGPT and it said that males in most species are more sexually disposable than females. In most species eggs are more costly to produce than sperm, which leads to evolution selecting for choosier females and more competitive riskier men. Exceptions are species like Seahorses where men carry pregnancies. But these…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	23/06/25 10:27 AM
-29	Male disposability is a human right, apparently Fatalistic response don’t know if this will be appreciated: Male sexual disposability is something that is embedded in sexual nature itself. Males in all species are more sexually disposable than females. Male’s will always be sexually disposable simply due to the fact that they are male. Men don’t care about men and women also don’t care about men. They only care about the best men. Feminism and male asymmetrical morality is downstream of men’s inherent sexual disposability. So in order to redu…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	23/06/25 09:53 AM
20	Concern around a particular type of criticism of male disposability The existence or cause of something isn't inherently justification for it's existence. The existence of rape or suffering or torture or child molesting isn't a justification for it's existence. It's something that exists and needs to be dealt with. Male sexual disposability is something that needs to be fixed or mitigated, it's not something that justifies itself.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	18/06/25 09:03 AM
1	The video was going so well until it got to 11:44. Men see it, we can’t articulate it. We see the moral asymmetries and hypocrisy. But it’s very difficult to articulate it, because feminists captured academia and language, and have a massive semantic advantage. Then there is the fact that by default, in most spaces in society, men are held to higher epistemic standards. It’s a recipe for women and feminists to have rhetorical and semantic dominance. That’s why they can get away with being so unfalsifiable and using so many logical fallacies. Lan…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	16/06/25 01:52 AM
2	Feminism mistakes oligarchy as patriarchy Patriarchy is too vague of a term. We need separate terms like, male dominance hierarchy, male intra-sexual competition, etc. it’s vagueness allows motte and bailey’s to exist. It also makes it difficult to address each limb of patriarchy, when it sounds like you’re attacking the whole thing at once. For example, I believe male dominance hierarchies and intra-sexual competition are an evolutionary product of sexual scarcity that men evolved into. There isn’t a solution for that without generatio…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	14/06/25 12:21 AM
0	"Women are overrepresented as victims of violence, violence against women is just much more often domestic violence, it is hidden" Good arguments, but I want you to provide some sources and data to make this more strong. I like the idea that unrecorded and recorded violence is more common with men, but it feels too speculative to me. I believe you but I want evidence. Also I’d like you to further address the argument “mutual abuse doesn’t exist under patriarchy”. Define “patriarchy” and define “mutual abuse”. Make it clear and falsifiable so feminists can’t squirm around this. I know these terms seem obvious, but lack of cl…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	13/06/25 11:29 PM
1	Do men and women express emotions differently? If so, why is the female way of expressing emotions seen as the default? In the past men’s bluntness, stoicism, competitiveness, and lower risk aversion would considered socially superior. The fact men didn’t express their emotions was considered a good thing, because men owned the moral high ground at the time. Lack of emotional expression was considered a virtue. The inverse is happening currently with women, with feminine emotional expression now being seen as superior, since women currently own the moral high-ground.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	10/06/25 02:19 PM
1	Are things getting better or worse for boys? Worse. They are setting them up for further disenfranchisement.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	09/06/25 06:27 PM
53	Feminism mistakes oligarchy as patriarchy Patriarchy is a term that isn’t always consistently defined by feminists. The statement “patriarchy hurts men” is a motte and bailey statement. “Patriarchy” means different things depending on what you argue against. Is patriarchy male intra-sexual competition? Is it the male dominance hierarchy? Or is it men en masse oppressing women? They shift the definition depending on the situation.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	08/06/25 11:19 AM
45	Men don’t know how to talk about their feelings. Men do know how to talk about their feelings. Their feelings get rejected, plain and simple. Men are held to an objectively higher standard then women when it comes to epistemic rigor. They are forced to be logical and reasonable because otherwise they aren’t respected. Men aren’t inherently more logical, they are forced to be.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	08/06/25 11:14 AM
1	A lot of men complain about the friendzone because they only befriend attractive women to try to date them Men are constantly told that in order to get with a woman you have to be her friend first. If they were just told the black pill or red pill (that they have to have looks, money, or status), then they wouldn't be surprised that being put in the friendzone accomplishes nothing. If a dude walks up to a girl and asks for sex up front, or an intimate relationship, she's going to call him a creep. So the advice is that he's supposed to "warm her up" first. What people don't understand is that you're …	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/05/25 12:15 AM
3	The male creation cycle I don’t know much about the Neptunia franchise, but I’m pretty sure those are games made for men. They only have girls in them because the girls are meant to be appealing to men. This is like saying Senran Kagura is for women because it mostly has girls in it.	/r/MensRights	25/04/25 06:01 PM
6	The male creation cycle This isn’t something to be proud of as a man. The vast majority of men were eccentric and failed as a result. Men have to take risks. Once something is established women ease in because it’s less risky. Women are less risk averse because they can afford to be.	/r/MensRights	25/04/25 05:54 PM