TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Think_Sample_1389 Archive

View 1 post and 57 comments by Think_Sample_1389 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
10

Think_Sample_1389/r/Male_Studies15/07/23 01:06 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

FETISH
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/09/25 09:29 PM
18

They send them to war and when they return, forget them. Sad indeed. ,
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/08/25 12:43 PM
1

It can also be just dumb American exceptionalism. We do it right.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/08/25 08:34 PM
1

Fetisher.. only a few Moms admit this. Many believe it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/08/25 08:33 PM
1

I think it's the face of a scared man who, rather than discuss this, flees the scene. Happened to me today.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/08/25 08:32 PM
1

But they are enablers, the woman who used the knife and too ka fee is the monster.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/08/25 08:30 PM
1

I have had it said to be, " there are more important things." There
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/08/25 08:27 PM
1

And medical profiteering
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/08/25 08:25 PM
1

They don't mention it is US except to say its cleaner cut. That is a lie.
/r/MensRights08/09/24 03:09 PM
1

Have you ever watched a cut male vs a normal male jack-off? It's obvious the loss of foreskin decreases sensitivity and as a male age, this only gets worse. The denial of the obvious is what I fail to get, that is a man saying glad he is circumcised, not unlike a person saying glad they are blind or have no thumbs.
/r/MensRights08/09/24 03:08 PM
1

How any rational male circumcised or not could not oppose such a violation of a male's body, escapes me.
/r/MensRights08/09/24 03:06 PM
1

But their strawman excuses are so outrageous, prevention of a UTI in a healthy baby or worse STD, WTF planet are they from? Those that do them should be jailed.
/r/MensRights17/07/24 04:24 PM
1

They can't admit the king has no clothes because if they did they'd see how perverted they are to ask or even allow it.
/r/MensRights17/07/24 04:22 PM
1

I got so many hospitals to hang up on me when I pointed out he was healthy and its illegal doing even a touching of a girl's privates.
/r/MensRights17/07/24 04:21 PM
1

Americans cannot face themselves and say the cabal has had them. Imagine excusing a sexual assault because a doctor did it and he's a baby. No, UTI and STD are not valid excuses.
/r/MensRights17/07/24 04:20 PM
1

Old posts sometimes is great resources.
/r/MensRights23/06/24 03:29 PM
1

One complication which is devastating after circumcision is the " buried penis."
/r/MensRights23/06/24 03:28 PM
1

Bullock is one deranged woman.
/r/MensRights23/06/24 03:27 PM
1

Any normal adult male will tell you the foreskin is not extra skin, it is a way of creating pleasure and protection. When the foreskin is irritated it tells its owner, wash me now. It is a marvelous part of male sexual anatomy.
/r/MensRights23/06/24 03:26 PM
1

The inside Cabal of circumcision pushers have a working network. Why else do we see a push to get it again government-funded? Oregon, South Carolina, et-al and they also tried recently in Maine with hospitals backing the efforts.
/r/MensRights23/06/24 03:23 PM
1

AI admits this organ trafficking market is remaining unregulated in 2024.
/r/MensRights23/06/24 03:20 PM
1

There has been inside the US, a medical blackout that routine circumcisions are not healthcare. Today, with corporations running the show, they will ask, press, and do anything to circumcise and get the insurance cash.
/r/MensRights23/06/24 03:19 PM
1

Never underestimate the non conscious not analyzed zeitgeist. They are everywhere, and have swallowed the blue pill.
/r/MensRights11/06/24 10:25 AM
7

The problem: The social zeitgeist is that men are evil and women are good. Men do violence to men and women. But women are sexually abused and are opportunists. If they even get that far in court, their case will be dismissed.
/r/MensRights10/06/24 09:10 PM
2

How is new born circumcision or the military draft equitable? It's part of the plunder of males,
/r/MensRights08/06/24 05:54 PM
32

Dude, I know they feeling and I'm now almost ready to catch the flight home at age 78. Men and boys do-not matter. I learned that at age 12. My sister got all the kudos. Today she claims she earned every one and if I got pulled under the trolly, it was because in her words, " you were always so gwad damn selfish." - My comment, if that were true maybe that's what a boy needs to do to survive. Of course she doesn't get it and never will. Flag draped coffins with tags arriving daily.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 01:10 PM
14

I can tell you even at 16 I knew what a false abuse this was. Look at the guys it murdered in Viet Nam. Disgusting abusive and sexist. Like circumcision, the electoral college, selective service is a relic of sexist abuse and government over reach.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/01/24 03:53 AM
1

She didn't even know how the penis works and claims the medical school and does them. So typical.
/r/MensRights18/04/23 04:34 PM
1

I have always thought being an intactivist for thirty years, Jewish paranoia alert. If in fact being anti-genital mutilation is anti-Semitic we have plenty of Jewish intellectuals who are against this. One might be Medelshon's father, who didn't cut Felix and today an entire group in Israel is opposed. Are they anti-semitic? I fear the pro-circumcision cabal has been debunked so now there is nothing left for them except to discredit the intactivists. BTW, the political correctness of Jews in the…
/r/MensRights07/04/23 09:50 PM
1

Incredible stupidity and US doctors should be charged and jailed.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 04:58 PM
1

Look what goes on in the US, states banning FGM while funding MGM. Talk about denial?
/r/MensRights23/02/23 01:14 PM
1

Men cut as babies in US at 80 percent claim they're undamaged. They're clueless and don't want to know. They also in the Philippines have a nasty slur for any boy uncut. Shabuts. (I think I spelled it right)
/r/MensRights23/02/23 01:12 PM
1

Can you imagine doing these in mass and calling it medicine? The women often dress with masks as if they're real medical personnel. And the Catholic church says nothing except sometimes offer a cut by trained medical staff. Abisive beyond the horizon.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 01:09 PM
1

The circumciser did it because they legally could but if families had sued them they would have won on assault of their child.
/r/MensRights20/02/23 02:11 PM
1

And if you were tone deaf or someone did break or destroy some of the inner ear's fine hairs, you would never enjoy high fidelity music, yet you say I am fine. I like music a lot.
/r/MensRights20/02/23 02:07 PM
1

The cutters will go silent when you tell the truth and the harm they do.
/r/MensRights20/02/23 01:59 PM
1

The rise in the US was done by the American Medical Gods and the introduction, sale and promotion of the Goldstein Circumcision clamps. The patent for this was issued to them in 1935. Notice WW 2 boys began to get cut as a routine and it accelerated to 1960 where 90 percent of newborns were cut. Rutland Vermont Medical center reported and the average of 76 percent in the last five years. This doesn't exactly square with media that the rate declines. In fact it may be the exact opposite.
/r/MensRights20/02/23 01:58 PM
1

Those are cutter scare stories and notice there never is any real discussion of how valid these claims are. They never go into the quality of research mode.
/r/MensRights20/02/23 01:54 PM
1

The US medical profession will never admit their badly done quack science has no external validity. Just look at the US funding circumcision crusades in Africa upon three highly biased false studies. Today the issue is whether will Africans ever sue the American abusers. remember USA is the biggest backer and supporter of male circumcision on Earth. US had CDC in support. Insane isn't it how a cut man or men will attempt to cut everybody else too. Invasion of the foreskinless penis cutters.
/r/MensRights20/02/23 01:51 PM
2

Oprah over her reign of terror upon the USA has been asked to discuss not circumcising. Her producers never responded. She did produce pro cutters Dr. Phil and Obscenity Dr. Oz and their careers in media because a pro cutter mouthpiece.
/r/MensRights20/02/23 01:44 PM
1

South Korea and Philippines.
/r/MensRights20/02/23 01:41 PM
1

In Europe, many Jews did not cut their sons. I saw on YouTube an ugly-looking old woman, who blocked comments. Her presentation was about the need for NHS to pay for baby circumcisions and she cited Jewish and Muslim communities with a great need for NHL assistance.
/r/MensRights20/02/23 01:40 PM
1

Scientific American and other pop-science magazines have lauded the use of foreskin infant tissues in virus research, vaccinate production, and burn victim temporary skin grafts. It seems the foreskin is a god sent when it is cut and developed for commercial use.
/r/MensRights20/02/23 01:37 PM
1

ADL and Jewish lobby had several US Senators send letters to Iceland to prevent any regulation. The Jewish population in Iceland was fewer than twenty people. The ADL and other groups began threats to Iceland , a country with heavy income from tourists that they would black ball if any regulation took place. Then suddenly from nowhere a Rabbi from Israel comes to Iceland to establish a Synagogue.
/r/MensRights20/02/23 01:33 PM
1

It was amplified by the priesthood (American doctors) and the ritual disguised as normal, healthy, everybody does it.. and then the social prejudices started after the doctor cult reached 80 percent cut in early 1960. While in mean time other countries did NOT have doctors eager to circumcise. The media began and research has shown if media ever discussed this it was said a healthy wonderful gift to your male baby. US military convinced South Koreans their sons need one in early 1950. It spread …
/r/MensRights20/02/23 01:26 PM
1

Common thought men who will talk is " Yeah I'm circumcised, too late for me." So the circumcisers win since he is right, it was done to him and upon his body without consent plus if the foreskin is now in face cream what can he do?
/r/MensRights20/02/23 01:21 PM
1

Boys and their dicks, let's face it we spend lots of days down there and we don't even know what the dick is for other than pee.
/r/MensRights20/02/23 01:18 PM
1

If you watch a cut man on Chaturbate you see they never touch the strawberry or need lots of lube. It seems the American Gaslights that protect circumcisers have made changes in cut men's minds. They never think about it and if they do rationalize why it was done. I've seen this over and over and men are not able to stand and listen to what was done to them or what they lost. I had one guy say, " glad, I'm cut because chicks like it better."-Like duh..
/r/MensRights20/02/23 01:17 PM
1

My two brothers were cut, and actually accepted the gaslights of American society. Neither explored why and one brother had early prostate cancer and was angry when I tried to make a joke about jerking off. So did he almost never do that?
/r/MensRights20/02/23 01:12 PM
1

Just to heads up the way it works, mine never had any orders or discharges and came back by itself spontaneously at age 13. I'm an old man today and never had a foreskin issue. The cleaning thing is unreal. Would they suggest vulva snips for girls because they might get dirty? Outrageous social myth.
/r/MensRights20/02/23 01:09 PM
1

Right. Women (mothers, don't watch it) the ghastly ACOG website says this cancels UTI and hygiene promotes. They always fail to see the human rights issue and bray that its good prophylactic medicine. I've seen many sites stating the AAP recommends it and that's what US media screamed in headlines in 2012. They never published the Euro debunking. Even Friedman said they didn't know complications or risks, just guessed they were low.
/r/MensRights17/02/23 05:08 AM
1

Gaslighted my medicals who in fact introduced it way back in 1935 and promoted the GOMCO clamps. Recently a lawsuit to stop Mass Medicaid from paying called for no recognizable excuse other than the doctor agreeing to its medicine. but wait they're cut and inside a biased cutter culture. Talk about BLIND.
/r/MensRights17/02/23 04:53 AM
2

They say women now are cutting babies in the USA. 80 percent of Obgyn are females. Of those cuts, they do they never experience any backfire. Sad. so 60,000 boys a month fill a football stadium and stats say at least twenty percent will be angry and resent it. That's a lot of angry men. the females just smile and move on. Ugh, That is how much the current zeitgeist resents men and lauds the female.
/r/MensRights16/02/23 07:12 PM
1

What about adult men who get cut and later see what it does, and a few have taken their lives? of course, the cutter class dismisses them.
/r/MensRights16/02/23 07:10 PM
2

Yes, Blood Stained Men, and other street activists such as Cock Fight.
/r/MensRights16/02/23 07:08 PM
1

Oh, you.. are so out of it. Men can live with the foreskin never fully retracting.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 08:58 PM
1

Could I say you are clueless, and you conjure up science? That's nothing short of vulgar.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 08:57 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter