TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Thinkmoreaboutit Archive

View 79 posts and 1,018 comments by Thinkmoreaboutit on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1889

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights30/06/17 10:54 PM
425

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights29/03/17 04:45 PM
331

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights03/06/17 03:58 PM
306

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights03/06/17 05:14 PM
205

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights07/05/17 05:40 PM
204

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights20/02/17 10:12 PM
185

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights13/12/16 02:44 PM
167

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights31/05/17 05:40 PM
161

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights03/06/17 04:15 PM
132

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights27/06/17 03:29 PM
124

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights26/03/17 09:28 PM
110

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights19/04/17 01:34 PM
110

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights30/06/17 03:55 AM
108

GeneralThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights06/01/17 09:02 PM
95

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights02/06/17 11:40 PM
83

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights23/03/17 03:26 PM
83

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights18/03/17 03:40 PM
77

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights17/04/17 06:06 PM
58

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights03/12/16 12:09 AM
57

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights18/03/17 01:08 AM
55

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights27/06/17 04:20 PM
53

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights01/07/17 07:33 PM
50

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights10/02/17 09:34 PM
49

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights03/07/17 03:42 AM
49

Legal RightsThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights27/02/17 02:19 AM
46

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights14/04/17 05:07 AM
44

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights20/04/17 01:06 PM
44

Legal RightsThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights18/12/16 04:05 PM
41

Thinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights19/09/16 09:50 PM
41

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights31/05/17 05:05 PM
40

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights07/02/17 04:28 AM
36

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights03/12/16 02:54 AM
36

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights31/03/17 01:16 PM
36

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights28/03/17 01:47 PM
35

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights03/06/17 07:40 PM
35

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights02/07/17 08:46 PM
35

Activism/SupportThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights13/12/16 03:29 AM
34

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights17/03/17 04:10 AM
31

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights30/06/17 09:37 PM
29

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights15/04/17 08:48 PM
29

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights29/11/16 09:55 PM
29

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights02/04/17 05:09 PM
29

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights09/05/17 06:51 PM
28

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights04/05/17 03:49 AM
27

Thinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights17/03/17 05:12 AM
25

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights19/11/16 08:25 PM
24

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights22/10/16 04:21 AM
20

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights24/11/16 02:22 AM
20

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights06/02/17 09:35 PM
19

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights15/02/17 04:17 PM
18

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights23/06/17 02:44 AM
18

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights30/03/17 12:02 AM
16

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights03/06/17 12:40 AM
15

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights23/11/16 02:58 AM
15

Thinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights09/11/16 11:16 PM
15

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights08/03/17 11:41 PM
14

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights07/11/16 08:20 AM
14

DiscriminationThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights15/11/16 01:13 AM
14

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights24/05/17 07:55 PM
14

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights04/04/17 02:46 PM
12

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights23/03/17 01:54 PM
10

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights24/11/16 01:18 AM
8

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights27/03/17 04:33 PM
7

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights30/05/17 03:13 PM
7

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights30/06/17 08:06 PM
6

Thinkmoreaboutit/r/MGTOW13/12/16 07:07 AM
5

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights06/12/16 08:58 AM
5

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights19/12/16 01:48 AM
5

Thinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights30/03/17 05:28 PM
3

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights01/06/17 06:32 PM
3

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights27/10/16 01:13 AM
2

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights01/02/17 09:05 PM
2

Thinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights12/09/16 09:16 PM
1

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights23/02/17 05:16 AM
1

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights06/05/17 10:24 PM
1

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights06/05/17 08:27 PM
1

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights21/04/17 09:08 PM
1

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights27/03/17 04:36 PM
0

IntactivismThinkmoreaboutit/r/MensRights06/12/16 05:11 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,018 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Don't tell me you're going to start "moderating" now. I will NOT allow predators to push the mutilation of children. Alts? Mash the keyboard and I've got a new shell. You can't stop the signal, and if you choose to follow this path, you'll find yourself on the wrong side of history.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 08:47 AM
1

Don't trust what motherfuckers say, trust what they do. And I do NOT trust you.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 08:31 AM
1

You can stop with the charade. You've been exposed. This sub is a dumpsterfire.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 08:21 AM
1

https://archive.is/o8TBw FOREVER
/r/MensRights03/07/17 08:16 AM
1

I speak truth and I will not be silenced by some fake ass fucking poser like yourself.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 08:14 AM
-1

Get. Fucked. You know how easy it is to make an account? You think I give a fuck about KARMA? You're fucking scum. You implicitly support circumcision by your refusal to stand up for Mens Rights. Let me reiterate, if it wasn't clear enough. G E T F U C K E D S C U M
/r/MensRights03/07/17 08:11 AM
1

A convicted child rapist does not belong in a daycare.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 08:06 AM
0

You cannot support the rape and mutilation of male babies and be for Mens Rights. You cannot be against a mans right to his whole body, and be for Mens Rights. You are fucking scum.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 08:03 AM
2

Bodily autonomy is a core issue of the Mens Rights movement. If you don't believe male genital mutilation (forced circumcision) is wrong, then you're NOT a fucking Mens Rights movement person. This is NON-NEGOTIABLE.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 07:52 AM
8

Sorry in attack mode and misread. Didn't mean the friendly fire. These people make me sick.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 06:48 AM
1

MGM = RAPE
/r/MensRights03/07/17 06:40 AM
1

INCORPORATE BITCOIN, DECENTRALIZE, ENCRYPT VIVA LA INFO FLOW!
/r/TheRedPill03/07/17 06:12 AM
17

Not a stretch whatsoever. It's a thought experiment. Highly related and relevant.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 05:18 AM
10

SIGH Rape and genital mutilation of a child is fucking disgusting, and before anyone says some dumb shit: RAPE unlawful sexual intercourse or any other sexual penetration of the vagina, anus, or mouth of another person, with or without force, by a sex organ, other body part, or foreign object, without the consent of the victim MUTILATE to injure, disfigure, or make imperfect by removing or irreparably damaging parts Stimulating an infants genitals and inserting tools is rape, if I did it to you …
/r/MensRights03/07/17 05:05 AM
6

Yes, that's what it's about.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 05:04 AM
1

You have made your position known. You are not for Mens Rights. This is LITERAL organ trafficking and harvesting from children. Get fucked. This sub is a dumpster fire.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 04:58 AM
22

Same reasons given for mutilating male babies.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 04:26 AM
26

It's a comparison of male genital mutilation (circumcision). Cosmetically altering a child. Some people see nothing wrong with violating a childs bodily autonomy in certain instanecs. I can tell you, and any of the upvotes you receive, did not read the article.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 04:23 AM
8

NEVER FORCIBLY RETRACT A CHILD! It is like ripping the nails off your finger!!!!
/r/MensRights03/07/17 03:49 AM
2

Get the fuck out supporting child rape. This has nothing to do with hating Jews. I hate all child predators.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 03:45 AM
2

SIGH Rape and genital mutilation of a child is fucking disgusting, and before anyone says some dumb shit: RAPE unlawful sexual intercourse or any other sexual penetration of the vagina, anus, or mouth of another person, with or without force, by a sex organ, other body part, or foreign object, without the consent of the victim MUTILATE to injure, disfigure, or make imperfect by removing or irreparably damaging parts Stimulating an infants genitals and inserting tools is rape, if I did it to you …
/r/MensRights03/07/17 03:44 AM
1

The part where the child is raped and mutilated and flesh is harvested.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 03:28 AM
2

Disgusting.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 02:20 AM
2

Modified. Happy?
/r/MensRights03/07/17 01:43 AM
6

Nearly .0001% may be true, but statistically irrelevant. Fuck off being pedantic.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 01:34 AM
0

Way to really add something to the discussion.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 01:22 AM
3

Which can be addressed without amputation.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 11:40 PM
-1

ARCHIVE.IS ARCHIVE.ORG
/r/MensRights02/07/17 09:03 PM
12

Creams, stretching, and less destructive surgeries like a dorsal slit usually fix these issues.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 09:01 PM
7

What age? What other methods were attempted to correct the issue?
/r/MensRights02/07/17 08:59 PM
3

Which was?
/r/MensRights02/07/17 08:55 PM
1

Right on. Choice. You choose :) It's always good to give to those who do practice though. Help where it's possible.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 08:55 PM
3

You do not pull a childs foreskin back. It is fused to the head like a fingernail is to your finger.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 08:41 PM
1

It's not better. It's the standard equipment one very male. You're just in deficit.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 08:41 PM
1

Fucked up and makes sense at the same time. Goddamnit world.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 08:39 PM
1

RAPECULTURE
/r/MensRights02/07/17 08:39 PM
1

Cultural relativism is a disease.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 08:34 PM
3

Death.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 08:24 PM
-4

How about work?
/r/MensRights02/07/17 08:24 PM
-1

If it's happening and being perpetrated, everyone needs to see it.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 08:24 PM
6

Not for healthy babies.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 08:23 PM
15

it's so rare that the necessity is (next to) non-existent. (Edit)
/r/MensRights02/07/17 08:23 PM
3

Normal penis isn't dangerous.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 08:21 PM
1

Fuck religions that rape and mutilate children.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 08:20 PM
2

Look into Brit Shalom and Beyond the Bris.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 08:19 PM
40

It is. It's CULTural practice.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 08:17 PM
2

Close the end of the foreskin and capture it then release :)
/r/MensRights02/07/17 08:17 PM
0

Fuck force.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 08:16 PM
5

Government is PEPFAR pushing mutilation and rape on the African people. FUCK THE GOVERNMENT
/r/MensRights02/07/17 08:14 PM
1

Never did such. You're the one unwilling to learn and communicate.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 08:12 PM
0

Every single moment about every single thing. Always.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 08:11 PM
2

Cutting dicks != Progress :/
/r/MensRights02/07/17 08:11 PM
1

You're perpetuating rape culture by being complicit in rape.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 08:11 PM
1

You're not even using logic moron. No disease, no issue, no consent; NO "TREATMENT"
/r/MensRights02/07/17 08:10 PM
1

Elaborate.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 08:09 PM
3

I accept your admission of willful ignorance.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 10:47 AM
1

It must suck to have a rigid and dead mind, although you're obviously not aware of it.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 10:37 AM
2

All voluntary donations. Million dollar operation on a shoestring budget.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 10:36 AM
2

Dismissing information before it has even been digested. We're done.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 10:35 AM
1

RAPECULTURE
/r/MensRights02/07/17 10:32 AM
3

Development happens differently for everyone, but on the average, most 15 year olds are not competent to make these decisions. If someone has a job, makes money, and can do all of these things on their own, have at it, that's autonomy.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 10:27 AM
0

I'm just ahead of the curve calling shit for what it is. Remember this, and be ready for the international shitstorm about to happen. !remindme 6 months
/r/MensRights02/07/17 10:21 AM
5

FGM = MGM https://aeon.co/essays/are-male-and-female-circumcision-morally-equivalent http://thoughtcrimeradio.net/2014/08/reality-neurologically-mgm-is-the-same-as-fgm/
/r/MensRights02/07/17 10:19 AM
2

https://www.littleimages.org/circumcision-is-unchristian/ http://catholicism.org/cantate-domino.html http://www.catholicsagainstcircumcision.org/
/r/MensRights02/07/17 10:17 AM
0

Agreed.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 10:14 AM
1

I'm not treating this like a joke, at all. Just because you can't connect the dots, doesn't mean it's not valid. Refer to my username.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 10:14 AM
6

Organ trafficking Sex trafficking Abuse
/r/MensRights02/07/17 10:07 AM
8

rapeculture
/r/MensRights01/07/17 09:07 PM
1

You're right. Most of the world doesn't rape and mutilate children.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 08:25 PM
2

This is not a joke.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 08:21 PM
0

Agreed.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 08:21 PM
5

Rape and mutilation of infants is not a valid "opinion"
/r/MensRights01/07/17 08:15 PM
2

If you can actualize, you can integrate. If you can't, it's chaotic trauma.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 08:13 PM
2

http://www.quranicpath.com/misconceptions/circumcision.html
/r/MensRights01/07/17 08:12 PM
0

"The beginning of wisdom is to call things by their proper name."
/r/MensRights01/07/17 08:10 PM
3

Yep.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 08:07 PM
1

Thank you for keeping the focus on this page. Much appreciated :)
/r/MensRights01/07/17 08:06 PM
1

Are you threatening me?
/r/MensRights01/07/17 08:02 PM
1

Imagine there's no heaven.....
/r/MensRights01/07/17 07:54 PM
1

Link does not work.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 07:53 PM
1

So, Reddit Meet and Greets are Thunderdrome? I mean, I'm not expecting much critical thought from you, but come on.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 07:50 PM
1

If the robber jacked you off before he robbed you, you were raped.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 07:49 PM
1

I did no such thing. Please improve the quality of your moderation. Who do I report you to?
/r/MensRights01/07/17 07:48 PM
1

P A R A N O I D A F Guilty conscience?
/r/MensRights01/07/17 07:39 PM
1

I'm just offering to validate my authenticity.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 07:34 PM
3

I accept your admission of willful ignorance.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 07:28 PM
1

Not solely, or all of them, but there are factions that are to blame.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 07:28 PM
2

"They held me down. I kicked and bucked and screamed and fought and screamed at the top of my lungs and struggled, but they held me down firmly. They were huge guys, four of them, one of them holding down each of my arms and legs so firmly I couldn't get free. Then the fifth one squirted some sort of cold, stinging liquid all over my penis and scrotum, spreading it all around my groin and all up in the folds and up and down the shaft, while I squirmed to no avail to get away. I tried to scream a…
/r/MensRights01/07/17 07:27 PM
5

That's the thing. It's not a competition. It's all a violation. I accept your admission of willful ignorance.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 07:27 PM
10

Cultures that rape children are not cultures that deserve to continue to exist.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 07:26 PM
–

Fragile AF.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 07:25 PM
2

Link me please!!!!
/r/MensRights01/07/17 07:21 PM
1

Your perception is yours, and yours alone. You perceived insult, I wasn't insulting.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 05:48 PM
4

"Actual rape victim." "They held me down. I kicked and bucked and screamed and fought and screamed at the top of my lungs and struggled, but they held me down firmly. They were huge guys, four of them, one of them holding down each of my arms and legs so firmly I couldn't get free. Then the fifth one squirted some sort of cold, stinging liquid all over my penis and scrotum, spreading it all around my groin and all up in the folds and up and down the shaft, while I squirmed to no avail to get awa…
/r/MensRights01/07/17 05:42 PM
1

Irrelevant. You're a username.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 05:41 PM
1

Stimulating = Jacking off.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 05:41 PM
2

J. Steven Svoboda, Peter W. Adler, Robert S. Van Howe. "Circumcision Is Unethical and Unlawful". J. Law Medicine & Ethics. 2016. I don't run from shit bitch.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 05:40 PM
3

If you're not actually going to learn anatomy, then we're done here. The proof your looking for is in the second link.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 05:38 PM
2

I didn't insult you. You said hair is a masculine trait, so bald men aren't masculine.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 05:38 PM
0

Stimulating an infants genitals for erection to cut is common. Anyones genitals who get fondled has a chance of causing erection.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 05:35 PM
2

What is the structure and function of the prepuce? It is you who lack the understanding of natural male anatomy to connect the dots. Here's a list for you go to through, it's from shortest to longest. The Real Reason You're Circumcised - Adam Ruins Everything - 3:56 What is the Structure & Function of The Foreskin? (Circumcision) - 19:20 Circumcision: The Whole Story - 19:44 Child Circumcision: An Elephant in the Hospital - 33:33 A Historical and Medical Critique of Circumcision - Dr. Christophe…
/r/MensRights01/07/17 05:35 PM
5

The Real Reason You're Circumcised - Adam Ruins Everything - 3:56 What is the Structure & Function of The Foreskin? (Circumcision) - 19:20 Circumcision: The Whole Story - 19:44 Child Circumcision: An Elephant in the Hospital - 33:33 A Historical and Medical Critique of Circumcision - Dr. Christopher Guest - 1:24:03 Circumcision: At the intersection of Religion, Medicine, and Human Rights - John Geisheker - 1:26:50 Changes in infants - Image Claims of curing over time - Image Foreskin comparison …
/r/MensRights01/07/17 05:31 PM
1

Those with eyes to see and ears to listen will. Hope that bliss isn't TOO painful, but it MAY wake you up eventually :)
/r/MensRights01/07/17 05:28 PM
2

Jacking off a baby is rape.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 05:27 PM
5

Google anatomy moron. You don't know how the penis functions. Gynecologist is voluntary, and done for an actual medical necsiity.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 05:27 PM
3

I'd suggest not talking to yourself. If anyone is contemplating raping and mutilating a child, the conversation is already shit
/r/MensRights01/07/17 05:26 PM
1

Threads are there for a reason.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 05:25 PM
2

You've got to hunt for a job, money, a store to get it from. THINKMOREABOUTIT
/r/MensRights01/07/17 05:25 PM
3

Cutting off healthy body parts is not lawful. TYL - CIRCUMFETISHISM It's ALL about sex.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 05:24 PM
5

Snap of the fingers and a wrinkle of the nose and it's gone? YOUTUBE A VIDEO AND WATCH IT, I FUCKING DARE YOU. Which procedure? Mogen? Plastibell? Freehand?
/r/MensRights01/07/17 05:24 PM
1

SIGH Rape and genital mutilation of a child is fucking disgusting, and before anyone says some dumb shit: RAPE unlawful sexual intercourse or any other sexual penetration of the vagina, anus, or mouth of another person, with or without force, by a sex organ, other body part, or foreign object, without the consent of the victim MUTILATE to injure, disfigure, or make imperfect by removing or irreparably damaging parts Stimulating an infants genitals and inserting tools is rape, if I did it to you …
/r/MensRights01/07/17 05:21 PM
6

FGM was promoted and legal in ths US until 1997. There is a Playboy magazine where it is talked about.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 05:20 PM
6

Why do people insist on talking about shit they don't know about. Type I: Also known as clitoridectomy, this type consists of partial or total removal of the clitoris and/or its prepuce. Type II: Also known as excision, the clitoris and labia minora are partially or totally removed, with or without excision of the labia majora. Type III: The most severe form, it is also known as infibulation or pharaonic type. The procedure consists of narrowing the vaginal orifice with creation of a covering se…
/r/MensRights01/07/17 05:16 PM
1

The foreskin is fused to the glans in infancy. A probe must be SHOVED IN between these and it must be ripped apart. The penis is a sexual organ. It is sexual penetration with an object. If you don't think that is, then you don't think sticking tools in a vagina is sexual.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 05:13 PM
12

Cut off your whole dick to be even more clean then. Cut off your ears, nose, etc. You wanna be clean right?!
/r/MensRights01/07/17 05:12 PM
9

WRONG. FGM = MGM https://aeon.co/essays/are-male-and-female-circumcision-morally-equivalent FGM = MGM http://thoughtcrimeradio.net/2014/08/reality-neurologically-mgm-is-the-same-as-fgm/
/r/MensRights01/07/17 05:11 PM
1

"define therapeutic" amazing.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 05:10 PM
2

Fake Athesist Auto DV
/r/MensRights01/07/17 05:01 PM
9

No it doesn't. You're a pedophile if you do it to a child for that reason.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 05:01 PM
6

Their preference relies on human rights violations to be perpetrated.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 04:58 PM
10

circinfo.net is ran by a circumfetishist pedophile. http://blogs.bmj.com/medical-ethics/2016/04/22/circumcision-and-sexual-function-bad-science-reporting-misleads-parents/
/r/MensRights01/07/17 04:56 PM
9

http://circumcisionharm.org/gallery1.htm Tell that to the dead babies.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 04:56 PM
–

I'm honest as fuck fam, check my history, you wanna meet and greet?
/r/MensRights01/07/17 04:54 PM
8

Comparing natural actions to raping and mutilating a child? Good luck with that.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 04:49 PM
4

Many more support this stance than not.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 04:48 PM
4

At one point, we all were.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 04:46 PM
–

SIGH Rape and genital mutilation of a child is fucking disgusting, and before anyone says some dumb shit: RAPE unlawful sexual intercourse or any other sexual penetration of the vagina, anus, or mouth of another person, with or without force, by a sex organ, other body part, or foreign object, without the consent of the victim MUTILATE to injure, disfigure, or make imperfect by removing or irreparably damaging parts Stimulating an infants genitals and inserting tools is rape, if I did it to you …
/r/MensRights01/07/17 04:44 PM
–

SIGH Rape and genital mutilation of a child is fucking disgusting, and before anyone says some dumb shit: RAPE unlawful sexual intercourse or any other sexual penetration of the vagina, anus, or mouth of another person, with or without force, by a sex organ, other body part, or foreign object, without the consent of the victim MUTILATE to injure, disfigure, or make imperfect by removing or irreparably damaging parts Stimulating an infants genitals and inserting tools is rape, if I did it to you …
/r/MensRights01/07/17 04:44 PM
–

SIGH Rape and genital mutilation of a child is fucking disgusting, and before anyone says some dumb shit: RAPE unlawful sexual intercourse or any other sexual penetration of the vagina, anus, or mouth of another person, with or without force, by a sex organ, other body part, or foreign object, without the consent of the victim MUTILATE to injure, disfigure, or make imperfect by removing or irreparably damaging parts Stimulating an infants genitals and inserting tools is rape, if I did it to you …
/r/MensRights01/07/17 04:43 PM
–

SIGH Rape and genital mutilation of a child is fucking disgusting, and before anyone says some dumb shit: RAPE unlawful sexual intercourse or any other sexual penetration of the vagina, anus, or mouth of another person, with or without force, by a sex organ, other body part, or foreign object, without the consent of the victim MUTILATE to injure, disfigure, or make imperfect by removing or irreparably damaging parts Stimulating an infants genitals and inserting tools is rape, if I did it to you …
/r/MensRights01/07/17 04:42 PM
9

Should we repeal FGM ban then? Human rights violations are not personal choices, they should absolutely be prohibited.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 04:40 PM
3

Babies aren't religious though.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 04:39 PM
5

When Jewish groups lobby to block male genital mutilation bans, yeah, they're responsible. Not solely, or all of them, but there are factions that are to blame.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 04:39 PM
8

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Trauma passing on trauma.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 04:38 PM
9

When a preference relies on a steady supply or raped and mutilated children, FUCK YOUR PREFERENCE
/r/MensRights01/07/17 04:37 PM
1

You got a thing for bald dudes then?
/r/MensRights01/07/17 04:36 PM
4

I'd definitely think there could be some correlation drawn.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 04:33 PM
2

It's just trauma passing on trauma. Some of it is intentional, most is just artifacts of the initial trauma. It's a shitty meme that got integrated into the mechanics of some societies. The internet is allowing us to neutralize these as they crop up though, it can no longer be hidden.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 11:14 AM
9

Uncomfortable possibly, but not pain.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 11:12 AM
–

Adults can actualize what is happening, babies have no point of reference. You are a goddamn pedophile psychopath.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 11:11 AM
2

Tell that to the dead babies. If it's just a piece of skin and not rape or murder... what's your address? I wanna play "doctor" There's also no safe word, since y'know, babies can't talk.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 11:09 AM
1

Everyone ALWAYS hunts.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 11:08 AM
1

You're on the internet. Use a fucking search engine.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 11:07 AM
15

What size tits you want your daughter to have?
/r/MensRights01/07/17 11:02 AM
3

The Real Reason You're Circumcised - Adam Ruins Everything - 3:56 What is the Structure & Function of The Foreskin? (Circumcision) - 19:20 Circumcision: The Whole Story - 19:44 Child Circumcision: An Elephant in the Hospital - 33:33 A Historical and Medical Critique of Circumcision - Dr. Christopher Guest - 1:24:03 Circumcision: At the intersection of Religion, Medicine, and Human Rights - John Geisheker - 1:26:50 Changes in infants - Image Claims of curing over time - Image Foreskin comparison …
/r/MensRights01/07/17 10:52 AM
15

Phimosis can largely be treated with non-surgical solutions or much less damaging procedures to correct as a last resort before full ablation of the prepuce. Grab a dictionary buddy.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 10:51 AM
2

Trauma based mind control. Fracturing the mind.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 10:38 AM
10

Rape and mutilation of children is illegal. It's just CULTurally practiced and... ignored.... for some reason...
/r/MensRights01/07/17 10:37 AM
17

Children are not competent to choose these. Would you allow a 12 year old daughter to get breast implants?
/r/MensRights01/07/17 10:34 AM
17

Less dick? Less pleasure? Scars? Dried out dick? Do tell.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 10:33 AM
-4

If you for one moment are considering mutilating and raping a child as acceptable, get the fuck out of this sub.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 10:32 AM
17

More sensory input = Better orgasm.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 10:31 AM
27

Except no hideous scar, or drying out of the glans.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 10:31 AM
21

more esthetic, You are a fucking pedophile. Also, the word is aesthetic.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 10:30 AM
12

Either you believe in human rights or the rape and mutilation of infants. Nobody cares what adults do to their body. To harm a child is reprehensible.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 08:41 AM
15

Serial killers have been known to be well functioning members of society.... minus the whole murdering part.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 06:37 AM
2

1 in the golf charts.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 06:36 AM
7

Eloquently put.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 06:34 AM
23

FGM = MGM = IGM = HGM Female, Male, Intersex, Human
/r/MensRights01/07/17 06:29 AM
6

They don't call it CULTure for nothin....
/r/MensRights01/07/17 06:28 AM
19

Male genital mutilation is a child sex offense.....
/r/MensRights01/07/17 06:27 AM
18

FGM = MGM The rape and mutilation of children is fucking disgusting. CHOICE?! I DID NOT CHOOSE THIS!!!!!!
/r/MensRights01/07/17 06:27 AM
1

https://archive.is/M5oEg For posterity.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 10:36 PM
1

You sure do love playing golf. LOL
/r/MensRights30/06/17 10:35 PM
3

When they CHOOSE to or there is ACTUAL medical indication. (VERY RARE!!!)
/r/MensRights30/06/17 10:34 PM
4

Babies don't get anesthesia.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 10:32 PM
2

Doesn't matter. If you can't discern the difference between anatomical information and child porn, I believe you should be relieved of your duties as a moderator because you clearly are not suitable for this position.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 10:17 PM
3

This is an example of anatomy. This is not pornography. I'll post NSFW next time. But don't get anatomy and child porn confused.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 09:45 PM
2

Keep bumping for everyone to see the truth. AUTODV
/r/MensRights30/06/17 08:15 PM
3

Yep. Penis is a reproductive organ, it's sexual. If sticking things in girls vaginas is sexual, so is sticking things in boys penis.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 08:08 PM
3

Penetration by force with an object. Yep, checks out as rape.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 08:08 PM
2

Want logic? No disease, no issue, no consent, no surgery. Get the fuck out.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 08:07 PM
1

AUTO DV DUE TO CENSORSHIP BY CIRCUMFETISHIST CONTROL OF PAGE
/r/MensRights30/06/17 08:07 PM
5

It's not legal. It's just not being punished as it should be.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 05:32 PM
1

Circumcision is a ritual human sacrifice.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 02:27 PM
2

Everyone should be against the rape and mutilation of children.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 02:26 PM
3

AUTO DV due to previous heinous statements.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 02:24 PM
2

Auto DV enabled.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 02:14 PM
2

There it is, the backward ass pedophile reveals himself. Tagged and bagged .
/r/MensRights30/06/17 02:14 PM
3

You can't read, can you? The words in bold are there for your help.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 02:13 PM
4

And the fact that one is actually a medical examination, and one a needless mutilation.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 02:13 PM
3

Medical examinations do not equal ripping apart a penis by shoving instruments in. It is NOT a medical procedure being performed on a healthy baby... So, no, I don't.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 02:12 PM
5

Alright. You still sound like a fucking moron, and I'm right.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 02:11 PM
7

You don't understand functional anatomy? :( Back to school m8
/r/MensRights30/06/17 02:09 PM
4

Nope.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 02:08 PM
8

There are no pros.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 02:07 PM
15

Zero reason to do this to a healthy baby.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 02:06 PM
13

The time varies. 3 is early. Some boys don't retract up until latter puberty. It should NEVER be forcefully retracted.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 02:05 PM
10

Agreed! Stop hacking up children!
/r/MensRights30/06/17 02:04 PM
6

Please, learn human anatomy. The foreskin is fused to the glans in infancy. A probe must be forcefully shoved in between these layers (think your fingernail on your finger) and ripped apart.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 08:32 AM
5

Apparently you can't read either.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 08:31 AM
13

Biased and controlled by circumfetishists.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 08:30 AM
3

So, sticking tools in a girls vagina isn't sexual penetration? Are you sure you know male anatomy? I can give you a refresher course if you need it.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 05:28 AM
2

It meets the definition of rape. RAPE unlawful sexual intercourse or any other sexual penetration of the vagina, anus, or mouth of another person, with or without force, by a sex organ, other body part, or foreign object, without the consent of the victim
/r/MensRights30/06/17 05:26 AM
20

Babies aren't human. Male babies are even less so.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 05:18 AM
18

SIGH Rape and genital mutilation of a child is fucking disgusting, and before anyone says some dumb shit: RAPE unlawful sexual intercourse or any other sexual penetration of the vagina, anus, or mouth of another person, with or without force, by a sex organ, other body part, or foreign object, without the consent of the victim MUTILATE to injure, disfigure, or make imperfect by removing or irreparably damaging parts Stimulating an infants genitals and inserting tools is rape, if I did it to you …
/r/MensRights30/06/17 04:39 AM
24

Non-therapeutic forced circumcision has always been genital mutilation and rape.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 04:33 AM
0

Fuck off autoDV everytime
/r/MensRights30/06/17 04:24 AM
12

Amputation is not a solution for hygiene. The fuck?
/r/MensRights30/06/17 04:23 AM
6

Rape and genital mutilation of a child is fucking disgusting, and before anyone says some dumb shit: RAPE unlawful sexual intercourse or any other sexual penetration of the vagina, anus, or mouth of another person, with or without force, by a sex organ, other body part, or foreign object, without the consent of the victim MUTILATE to injure, disfigure, or make imperfect by removing or irreparably damaging parts Stimulating an infants genitals and inserting tools is rape, if I did it to you it'd …
/r/MensRights30/06/17 04:22 AM
2

It's so funny to watch you get your ass handed to you perpetually.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 04:09 AM
2

Get the fuck out child rapists mutilation apologist.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 04:08 AM
1

It's the internet. Get that motherfucking defeatist bullshit out of here. Ride or die motherfucker.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 04:07 AM
2

Fucking shithole sub.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 04:05 AM
0

Exactly, the rape and mutilation of children has echoed throughout history. No longer.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 04:04 AM
1

I sleep fine knowing that I fight against the rape and mutilation of children.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 04:03 AM
1

I don't give a fuck what an adult chooses. UTI can can come from sex. Babies don't fuck, don't force it on them. Cutting off part of your dick doesn't prevent STD.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 04:02 AM
3

These people do not know natural male anatomy and cause damage.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 04:50 PM
1

Cut off your dick, you'll never have a risk of STD. I assume you support removing baby girls breasts to prevent breast cancer as well?
/r/MensRights29/06/17 04:50 PM
3

If saving children is psychopathy, call me Papa Psychopath.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 04:44 PM
0

Obviously not since babies are being raped and mutilated everyday still....
/r/MensRights29/06/17 04:43 PM
1

Nope. All bullshit. Babies don't have sex.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 04:42 PM
1

Robots aren't humans. Voluntary sex work is totally acceptable. f Education and respect for human rights reduces rape.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 09:45 PM
5

Boy, I sure wish I got that fucking choice. Nobody is saying grown adults can't do whatever the fuck they want to their body. Stop raping and mutilating children.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 09:44 PM
3

Logic and ethics as well.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 09:43 PM
8

Rape and mutilation are not parental choices. Get that through your fucking head.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 09:41 PM
7

Finally agreeing? I've always thought people should be able to modify their body how they want. I don't give a fuck what you do to yourself. But, don't be spreading FUD about how lopping off part of your dick is good.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 04:31 PM
1

Sex falls under the umbrella of power.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 04:31 PM
6

I don't care what an adult does with their body. It's theirs.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 04:30 PM
8

Force positions? It's either rape and mutilate a child or respect them. This is the fucking stupid shit you say that gets you down voted.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 08:08 AM
7

A lot of men feel psychologically traumatized by your posts. That's part of the reason you get downvoted so much, because a lot of them feel you are invalidating the horror and anguish they feel at having had the most sensitive parts of their genitals cut off. A lot of men angry about circumcision felt sick about it when they first found out they were circumcised, before they even really knew the full extent of how much tissue was taken from them. Yep. FUCK that dude.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 08:07 AM
1

Oh, you're a prude too? LOL
/r/MensRights28/06/17 07:41 AM
1

CAN-FAP
/r/MensRights28/06/17 07:39 AM
0

LOL
/r/MensRights28/06/17 07:19 AM
9

There are no benefits to cutting off a part of your healthy dick. But, any adult can choose to modify their body how they want.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 07:16 AM
14

Repeal FGM ban! It's hindering! Rape and mutilation are not parental choices.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 07:14 AM
9

MGM = FGM Homologous organs. Get that fake ass atheist still supporting ritual human sacrifice shit out of here.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 07:11 AM
2

There's few avenues of humor, but I take 'em when I can get 'em. It's a fucked up space to operate in :/
/r/MensRights28/06/17 01:13 AM
1

It's not about sex. It's about power.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 01:09 AM
6

If I jacked you off before I killed you, it'd be rape + murder. etc. Your logic = NONE
/r/MensRights28/06/17 01:09 AM
10

Trauma based mind control. It's a way of fracturing the mind.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 01:06 AM
2

Definitions are definitions. Use them correctly, or don't participate in this discussion.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 01:06 AM
17

She chose to be naked. It's skin. We all have it. There's nothing strange about the human body being naked. Nudity is not lewd.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 07:22 PM
12

What's lewd about this?
/r/MensRights27/06/17 06:50 PM
12

Offtopic Keep typing bullshit though, people like to check out things with lots of posts.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 06:45 PM
3

If you really need someone to tell you the difference between taking care of a child, and flaying their penis, you've got serious fucking issues.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 06:44 PM
19

That is not logic you fucking moron. You're setting up your own path for your own reason. CLEANING is not the same as CUTTING OFF AND INSERTING TOOLS. THE LOGIC IS NOT THERE YOU FUCK.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 06:36 PM
2

It's already obviously rape and illegal. You're either a troll (useless to respond to any further), someone who will never be in a position to be around children because it seems as if you are a robot and aren't around people at all anyway, so that's good. If neither, kindly hug your nearest train for me and send my best wishes.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 06:35 PM
16

Circumfetish - IntactWiki TYL
/r/MensRights27/06/17 06:31 PM
14

STOP FUCKING COMPARING CARETAKING TO SEXUAL ASSAULT AND GRIEVOUS BODILY INJURY!
/r/MensRights27/06/17 06:23 PM
3

Cleaning and caretaking is not equatable to mutilation and inserting tools into the penis. That is not how you clean an intact child. If you don't like the term rape, then it's sexual assault. You don't stick tools into a female to clean her.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 06:20 PM
4

CAN-FAP
/r/MensRights27/06/17 06:15 PM
6

Read OP... Still wondering? Read OP... You can't justify child rape and mutilation.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 06:12 PM
9

Caring is not equatable to carving. Get fucked.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 06:05 PM
13

Please, do not attempt to equate caring for a child to flaying their penis. I don't think I can help you out if you dig much more.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 06:02 PM
15

Fuckedfact: There's no actual licensing needing to rape and mutilate baby boys. A man did his own son on his kitchen table, documented it, and promotes it. I also believe he's on the board of something? Conflict of interest.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 06:00 PM
13

Intact Activism; Lovely, ain't it?
/r/MensRights27/06/17 05:58 PM
5

Off topic.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 05:57 PM
22

Pride is about accepting people for who they are. Accept men for their whole body. Babies do not need disassembly.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 05:23 PM
11

And rape. Please learn the definition. Babies can't consent. It's rape and mutilation.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 05:22 PM
17

Stimulating an infants genitals and inserting tools is rape. If I did it to you, it'd be rape. Please, brush up on your knowledge of definitions.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 04:59 PM
3

Dr. Momma - Biblical Circumcision Information Little Images - Circumcision is Unchristian
/r/MensRights26/06/17 03:21 PM
5

Rape and mutilation of baby boys is incompatible with mens rights.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 10:01 AM
5

Logic never matters to these people.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 06:44 AM
1

2x penile cancer from HPV from being cut?
/r/MensRights04/06/17 06:31 AM
2

Sadly, many men think that they are PROTECTED by circumcision :(
/r/MensRights04/06/17 06:30 AM
2

lol Cutting off a piece of your dick for sub par sex, yeahhhhhhhhhh greaaaaaaaaaat idea. How about... y'know, train your body? Be in tune with your body? There are exercises for control...
/r/MensRights04/06/17 05:59 AM
2

Death, keratinization of the glans, ED, loss of penis, loss of sensitivity, chaffing, painful intercourse with partners, skin bridges, ripping bleeding erections, psychological damage..... COMPLICATIONS ARE HARM, DEATH IS HARM No. Adult circumcision is much safer as: The organ is fully developed so accurate cuts can be had. Adults receive pain management, babies do not. You've got to be fucking trolling. You can't be this stupid.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 05:43 AM
1

You're the "atheist" who believes in religious mock human sacrifice rituals. lol
/r/MensRights04/06/17 05:42 AM
2

Linguistics isn't a strong suit of yours either... I'm beginning to wonder if you have one... You calling it circumcised and uncircumcised normalizes circumcision. You don't call people unimprisoned. You call them free. Get it yet?
/r/MensRights04/06/17 05:41 AM
1

A great documentary is coming out :) American Circumcision Complications include: Death, keratinization of the glans, ED, loss of penis, loss of sensitivity, chaffing, painful intercourse with partners, skin bridges, ripping bleeding erections, psychological damage.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 05:38 AM
2

You don't understand logic operations. Noted. YOU declined to learn and understand the definition of mutilation. YOU are the one who gave up ;)
/r/MensRights04/06/17 05:35 AM
1

At least I CAN think ;)
/r/MensRights04/06/17 05:34 AM
1

I'm not. I'm just correcting you. The term uncircumcised implies that circumcision is normal. This is part of the mind virus that normalizes it. Intact is the correct term. Circumcision (voluntary) / Genital mutilation and rape (involuntary) It's a shitty post because you just made up a scenario that fits it. My example is much more in line with something that is actually applicable.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 05:33 AM
1

Gotcha. More euphemisms for rape and genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 05:29 AM
2

"I also admitted that I very well may have had more pleasure if I was uncut I just don't believe the amount of pleasure I have is inferior to any an uncut man gets" The grapes you cannot reach. They must be no good, they must be sour, there's no reason to get them. Rationalization of the damage.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 05:28 AM
2

Well, at least you admit you have no interest in honestly discussing this topic.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 05:27 AM
2

So you admit you carve your sexual preference into children and find that acceptable. Circumfetishists always hang themselves.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 05:23 AM
1

I'm for ANYONE shutting down and ending male genital mutilation. There is long term harm. It's documented. You're gonna be so embarrassed later this summer. Remember this ;)
/r/MensRights04/06/17 05:19 AM
1

What is MIC?
/r/MensRights04/06/17 05:17 AM
1

The correct term is intact. You don't call people undecapitated. Your choice of words highlights your lack of understanding of this topic. What a shitty, useless post.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 05:16 AM
2

"The beginning of wisdom is to call things by their proper name." Circumcision is a euphemism for genital mutilation and rape. Do you think that little girls should be able to opt to be circumcised?
/r/MensRights04/06/17 05:14 AM
2

Please, learn the definition of mutilation. You must do this before we proceed any further. Biology and procedures are VERY similar. Please, learn anatomy. Learn that these are homologous organs (look it up, because you obviously don't understand this).
/r/MensRights04/06/17 05:13 AM
1

Indeed. But this is also a sick facet of this disgusting mind disease. http://intactwiki.org/wiki/Circumfetish
/r/MensRights04/06/17 05:12 AM
2

I don't like to play the oppression olympics. They're both terrible.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 05:05 AM
1

Some Medicaid (and other similar programs) will NOT pay for it in certain areas. And, yes, most people ARE stupid enough to pay it. http://imgur.com/gPTuMWY
/r/MensRights04/06/17 04:39 AM
3

Compare an intact glans to an expose glans. You'll see the difference.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 04:35 AM
1

"Pleasure" is subjective. Someone could theoretically be TOO sensitive, thus removing sensory receptors would be an acceptable compromise. HOWEVER this is not something can be determined in infancy.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 04:30 AM
3

It's still rape. It involves sticking objects into the genitals. This fucking double standard needs to be realize.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 04:25 AM
4

It's still rape. It involves sticking objects into the genitals. This fucking double standard needs to be realize.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 04:25 AM
1

Definitely not a troll. It's a thought piece.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 04:16 AM
1

They were misinformed, hoodwinked, lied to. Discussion? What's there to discuss? Forced circumcision is rape and genital mutilation and must end.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 04:13 AM
1

Thanks! PM your story if you don't mind. Or here for others to see.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 04:12 AM
1

Tools are inserted into the penis. That fits the definition of rape.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 04:12 AM
2

You can object all you want, doesn't mean you're right. Normal intact body = What you had. Mutilated body = What you have now. You have less. Those grapes sure are sour aren't they? It's not about me is the thing. It's about babies being raped and mutilated.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 04:11 AM
2

It is. It's just CULTurally tolerated.... for some odd fucking reason.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 04:09 AM
2

Pleasure is subjective. Objectively you have more sensory input being intact, thus a higher chance of the normal amount of pleasure, not less. Fuck any skank ass slut that shames men for not being mutilated. You've normalized the damage your entire life, it's all you know.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 11:08 PM
3

Less sensory receptors = Less sensory input. Objectively, you have less. Pleasure is subjective, but those facts are not.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 10:53 PM
1

Foreskin Restoration. Google it. There are support groups and information if you are wanting help.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 10:36 PM
4

A bit? It's fucking bonkers.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 10:32 PM
3

Remove sensory receptors, reduce sensory input. Unless you're talking about nerve DAMAGE. I don't give a fuck what people do to their OWN body. STOP. HARMING. CHILDREN.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 10:32 PM
3

Excitation theory. If it's bland and doesn't stimulate you it won't unleash your carnal beast. /s
/r/MensRights03/06/17 10:30 PM
-6

If I stimulated your genitals, it'd be rape. If I stimulated a baby girls genitals, it'd be rape. Take off your CULTural blinders. Your username must be a misnomer? Why are you supporting a religious mock human sacrifice ritual?
/r/MensRights03/06/17 10:27 PM
5

No, they're for the CHOICE of a COMPETENT individual to CONSENT to modify their body. It's no different than choosing breast augmentations for a child or a child wanting breast implants. They're not competent enough to understand the ramifications.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 10:25 PM
5

Kellogg.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 10:21 PM
6

Which makes no sense because it destroys the natural function of the penis.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 10:19 PM
4

You do have side effects. See that dark scar line on your penis? Your sword (penis/glans) is not being protected by it's sheath (foreskin/prepuce).
/r/MensRights03/06/17 10:16 PM
1

Yes.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 10:16 PM
-6

Every doctor is dumb for raping and mutilating children.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 10:14 PM
0

LOL @ AN ATHEIST SUPPORTING A RELIGIOUS MOCK HUMAN SACRIFICE RITUAL
/r/MensRights03/06/17 10:14 PM
6

No, it's not. If you're not for a man to have the right to decide what happens to his body, you are not for mens rights. It's pretty fucking simple.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 10:14 PM
-1

LOL @ AN ATHEIST SUPPORTING A RELIGIOUS MOCK HUMAN SACRIFICE RITUAL
/r/MensRights03/06/17 10:13 PM
3

The "normal" one they still jerk the baby.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 09:59 PM
4

Get fucked circumfetishist sympathizer.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 09:57 PM
7

Both are sexual abuse. Both never use pain meds.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 09:36 PM
4

Sorry to hear that. I haven't started restoring yet, but plan to in the future.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 08:52 PM
9

It took me 27 years to realize what the fuck happened to me. When I read, I instantly knew it was fucked.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 08:24 PM
12

It's written in a serious way, like someone trying to defend MGM.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 08:21 PM
12

Forced circumcision is genital mutilation and rape. Please, learn the definitions. Cutting off a part of your dick does not help anything. It doesn't pass even the simplest shit test. Every male on the planet is born defective and must have corrective surgery on their reproductive organ..... NOT! No disease, no issue, no consent, no surgery.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 08:19 PM
8

It's interesting to note that they must defend FGM but by defending FGM they are sealing their own fate. Poetic.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 08:15 PM
38

No trolling. It's a thought experiment to get people to understand that modifying a childs body without consent is fucking absurd.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 08:14 PM
15

If you're for the mutilation and rape (circumcision) of baby boys, you're not for Mens Rights. Absolutely baffling when people try to defend it here.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 08:13 PM
2

Right on, I didn't think of scouring your history to find it :P I need to get a copy of your copy pastes.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 08:12 PM
5

/u/Consilio_et_Animis Got a copy paste handy?
/r/MensRights03/06/17 08:00 PM
5

What? Do you need data to know that FGM is a human rights violation and harmful?
/r/MensRights03/06/17 07:11 PM
1

Shaming victims of genital mutilation. Get fucked.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 07:10 PM
6

There are no benefits to removing healthy genital tissue from infants. It's a human rights violation.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 07:05 PM
8

Either you're a circumfetishist, or a moron. Less sensory receptors = Less sensory input. Cut off a finger, you won't have as much sensory input. If you change form, you change function. Take out a few notches on a gear or change the size of it, you will destroy the machine it runs in.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 06:59 PM
6

'metzitzah b'peh' They also give them herpes and kill them. Check the news.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 06:45 PM
20

The irony is it's actually antisemitic to harm Jewish babies...
/r/MensRights03/06/17 05:35 PM
3

There are NO health benefits to cutting healthy genital tissue.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 04:05 PM
6

Cool. Don't force it on children.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 04:05 PM
5

10/10 would obliterate again hahaha
/r/MensRights03/06/17 04:04 PM
3

Sorry YOU have fucked up genetics that you think you have to chop a part of your dick off LOL
/r/MensRights03/06/17 04:03 PM
6

Sound exactly like a fucking child predator.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 04:02 PM
6

It happens to everyone. That's what happens when you remove the protective covering. Please learn anatomy.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 04:02 PM
9

You were mutilated. Please, learn definitions.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 04:01 PM
10

An opinion stops being an opinion when you carve it into a childs genitals. Get fucked.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 04:01 PM
2

Rape and mutilation are not acceptable.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 04:00 PM
7

Remove sensory receptors, reduce sensory input. Change form, change function.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 03:59 PM
15

I don't care what adults do to their body. Stop harming children.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 01:15 AM
17

Survey you say? http://circumcisionharm.org/ Any man can get cut, nobody can get uncut. How is this so fucking hard to comprehend?
/r/MensRights03/06/17 01:08 AM
26

There are many forms of female circumcision. There is no such thing as excess genital skin. FGM = MGM Bodily autonomy is a cornerstone of Mens Rights. If you do not believe in it, you do not believe in mens rights.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 01:04 AM
9

I know it's definitely making waves. I've been hammering it the past few years and I've seen it expand. Thanks for everything you do.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 12:22 AM
2

Y'all motherfuckers are insane to compare cleaning and maintenance to unnecessarily fondling and mutilating genitals. Get the fuck out.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 06:31 PM
1

Somebody raped and mutilated me at birth. Babies are strapped down and have a part of their fucking penis cut off. I mean you obviously see how female genital mutilation is wrong, yes? Male genital mutilation is exactly the same violation.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 03:53 PM
1

Genitals are reproductive organs. It's sexual. Circumfetishists
/r/MensRights01/06/17 03:51 PM
3

You don't see anything wrong with harvesting healthy, functional, genital tissue from a non-consenting party?
/r/MensRights01/06/17 03:48 PM
9

If you don't support bodily autonomy, you cannot support mens rights, or human rights at all.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 12:54 AM
1

sexual penetration Feeding isn't sexual, flaying a PENIS is.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 12:52 AM
2

Not hyperbole. How is it not rape? What do you call it?
/r/MensRights31/05/17 11:19 PM
3

Rape is accurate. Sexual assault is accurate. What do YOU call it?
/r/MensRights31/05/17 11:18 PM
14

Immediately violated form the fucking start line.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 11:01 PM
15

Then they're not for mens rights. Bodily autonomy is a CORE belief of mens rights.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 11:00 PM
5

I love Brother K. If you follow him, you may know me :P
/r/MensRights31/05/17 10:58 PM
3

Are you attempting to equate nourishing a child with flaying their penis? Get fucked.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 10:57 PM
7

Fuck that definition. That's absolute shit. Here's a much better one: unlawful sexual intercourse or any other sexual penetration of the vagina, anus, or mouth of another person, with or without force, by a sex organ, other body part, or foreign object, without the consent of the victim. an act of plunder, violent seizure, or abuse; despoliation; violation
/r/MensRights31/05/17 10:11 PM
5

Then sexual assault? Why be pedantic?
/r/MensRights31/05/17 10:10 PM
10

Then you must be in the wrong sub.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 10:09 PM
13

Stimulating an infants genitals an inserting tools is definitely rape.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 08:29 PM
7

Some get pleasure from all of the power they get to exert. And this is an ultimate power trip.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 07:59 PM
21

Forced infant circumcision is rape, mutilation, child abuse, and a human rights violation.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 06:14 PM
17

This is talking about forced infant circumcision. Care to revise your statement?
/r/MensRights31/05/17 06:13 PM
21

Stimulating an infants genitals and inserting tools is rape. If I did it to you, it'd be rape.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 06:12 PM
7

Actually... Muslim - http://www.quranicpath.com/misconceptions/circumcision.html Jewish - http://www.britshalom.info/ Christian - https://www.littleimages.org/circumcision-is-unchristian/
/r/MensRights09/05/17 05:58 PM
5

It took me until I was 27 to realize. Message me when you feel like helping with the cause.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 06:20 PM
1

Religion and race are irrelevant aside from tracking down the criminals who do this.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 06:17 PM
1

Circumfetishist derail. Enjoy the void.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 08:48 AM
2

Not white. Not an atheist. You're racist and a child abuser.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 08:30 AM
2

If rape and MUTILATION are your religion, it deserves to die.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 08:11 AM
5

You definitely sound like a circumfetishist. Fucking vile creature you are.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 08:02 AM
3

You can? Cool. My religion says kill all those who cut babies. Respect my religion.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 08:01 AM
-5

-4 hoots pleb
/r/MensRights08/05/17 08:00 AM
-3

You can get fucked :) no derailing this train.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 07:56 AM
5

Babies aren't religious. You can't practice your religion on other people. GG
/r/MensRights08/05/17 07:55 AM
8

Detecting circumfetishist scent in this one.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 07:47 AM
-4

Booooohooooo biiiiitch
/r/MensRights08/05/17 07:44 AM
3

Your god is a baby rapist infantophile and deserves to be thrown in the garbage.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 07:43 AM
3

Then you support baby rape you infantophile.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 07:42 AM
13

Anyone who advocates for the rape and mutilation of infants can die in a fire slowly.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 03:38 AM
6

I wasn't. The Bloodstainedman logo wasn't adopted until recently. Google Johnathan Conte. He was heavily affected by this issue and ended his life.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 01:31 AM
6

Some people have been protesting 30+ years and corresponding through mail before the internet.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 01:23 AM
13

Hash tags. Check Twitter / Facebook for more coverage.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 06:12 PM
21

Bloodstained Men & Their Friends at 2017 ACOG convention.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 05:41 PM
3

If they sucked their dick while murdering, yeah, they'd be a rapist as well.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 05:15 PM
21

Sucking a child's penis is infantophilia. Fuck off child rape apologist.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 03:09 PM
15

Ostracize them from civilization.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 01:58 PM
26

Shielding child molesters.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 01:06 PM
5

Proper mutilation lol
/r/MensRights20/04/17 12:29 PM
3

Male genital MUTILATION*
/r/MensRights20/04/17 12:26 PM
2

Rape and mutilation are not legal.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 12:25 PM
6

Let's stop calling it surgery. Surgery is to fix ailments. This is mutilation.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 12:24 PM
3

Both at fault. What the fuck is with these rape mutilation apologists above?!
/r/MensRights20/04/17 12:24 PM
2

Improper procedure for a high risk mutilation.... Well... They're all improper...
/r/MensRights20/04/17 12:23 PM
2

The rate is quite lower than that with intact babies being born more frequently.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 09:50 PM
0

Copy paste.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 10:42 PM
5

WHEN WILL THIS HYPOCRITICAL DOUBLE STANDARD END?!
/r/MensRights14/04/17 05:09 AM
4

Rape culture happens every day to baby boys being genitally mutilated (circumcised).
/r/MensRights12/04/17 04:05 AM
1

Offer it as an pay it over time option (to own afterwards) or use it as a discount incentive to reduce incidence like these.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 05:37 PM
1

Fuck off baby rape genital mutilation apologist.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 02:24 PM
2

Maimonides, M., Guide for the Perplexed (1190: reprint, New York: Dover Publications, 1956), 378. Concerning the sexual impact, Maimonides wrote, "Circumcision weakens the power of sexual excitement." Found on: http://www.jewishcircumcision.org/spectator.htm
/r/MensRights01/04/17 11:38 PM
1

MGM and FGM are abhorrent human rights violations.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 03:33 AM
4

Trauma based mind control and ritual pedophilia.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 11:03 PM
6

Raping and mutialting a child is a human rights violation and people are learning that. It took me 27 years to realize what happened to me. It's in full support of my argument. The disgusting shit is being brought to light.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 09:01 PM
6

Are you aware of how fast the internet​ has enabled ideas to spread? Damn near instantaneously.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 07:45 PM
7

Pedophiles are pedophiles. Jewish pedophiles aren't special. Also, I'm not anti-circ. I'm anti-genital mutilation and rape.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 06:57 PM
15

And women will never vote, and slavery will never end, and 124kb of ram will be all we'll ever need.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 04:56 PM
4

Check muh post history brah.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 04:49 PM
1

If you do the sex with a kid, you're a pedophile.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 04:48 PM
6

Look up CIRCUMFETISHISM you dense, apologist fuck.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 04:41 PM
8

Look up Brit Shalom and Beyond the Bris.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 04:36 PM
11

Sucking a babys penis is pedophilia. Fuck off apologist. I swear you motherfuckers get caught up on the stupidest shit.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 04:34 PM
15

These pedophiles will do anything to suck baby penis.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 01:31 PM
1

I'm not wallowing.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 04:52 PM
1

You are in the denial stage right now. I'm sorry for your loss.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 03:05 PM
0

"Less violent" rape is still rape. It's fucking wrong and disgusting. It's not the pain Olympics motherfuckers.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 02:54 PM
2

[Changes in infants] (https://imgur.com/lAQrPV7) - Image As well as the trauma of realizing you were violated at birth and are missing an important part of your penis.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 02:50 PM
1

Delusional moron.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 07:24 AM
-1

The truth shall set you free, but first it'll piss you off.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 07:21 AM
0

Cutting children is criminal. 0/10 Are you really THAT lonely?
/r/MensRights30/03/17 07:00 AM
1

4year old troll account? That's dedication.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 06:41 AM
0

Check my post history moron.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 06:21 AM
0

Get fucked troll.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 04:47 AM
1

You do you, I do me.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 04:34 AM
-1

The mutilation was intentional. You're ignoring and arguing for no good fucking reason. Just end at STOP RAPING AND MUTIALTING CHILDREN. Goddamn gold medal gymnast.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 04:28 AM
8

Babies aren't religious. You can't practice your religion on other people. This is a complete lack of enforcement and is an endorsement of pedophilia.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 04:27 AM
2

I don't expect logic and reason from people who don't understand how disgusting and damaging genital mutilation is.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 04:19 AM
-1

Get over it mutilation apologist.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 04:10 AM
-5

That's not a fucking argument you moron. It's not good. It's a mental disease trying to justify MUTILATIONS.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 04:10 AM
-3

Good job dismissing the harms of genital mutilation and the pain of men.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 03:58 AM
1

The destruction of the genitals was intentional.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 03:32 AM
4

Genital mutilation and rape is pretty fucking horrible.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 03:31 AM
1

Lack of ethics.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 02:58 AM
-1

Are you a fucking moron? It's trauma regardless. THIS is the shit thinking that allows this to persist. IT'S FUCKING DISGUSTING!
/r/MensRights30/03/17 02:55 AM
2

I could see how that could be mistaken as banning the practice, but that's not how I intended it to sound. Typed it up from the URL. I agree it's so fucked. Well... You two can't suck baby dick anymore... Buuuuuut.... go ahead still chopping up baby dicks til your hearts content.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 02:54 AM
-2

Triggered by truth? It was an honest question.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 02:35 AM
6

Would you say the same for an arm or an eye? Classic denial of harm. I'm glad you're okay with your body, but don't for a moment a think this is acceptable to do to anyone.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 02:34 AM
9

Mutilation is mutilation.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 02:32 AM
8

Scarred, dried out, missing function looks better?
/r/MensRights30/03/17 12:37 AM
18

You had a choice. Good for you.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 12:01 AM
1

Call it mutilation.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 12:00 AM
7

Bad accident? They were mutialting a child.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 09:53 PM
2

Genital mutilation is genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 08:54 PM
68

Age is irrelevant. Rape and mutilation is abhorrent.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 08:47 PM
–

Fuck off pedophile.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 06:24 PM
6

As long as you don't rape and mutilate your children, cool.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 05:51 PM
2

There's always a scar line from separation of flesh and the attempt of the body to repair itself.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 05:50 PM
41

Cutting healthy body parts off a non-consenting person is mutilation. Stimulating an infants genitals and inserting tools is rape. Learn2definition.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 05:07 PM
52

Nothing should be removed from a healthy baby. Genital mutilation and rape should not be allowed to happen to a child.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 05:00 PM
67

You're not supposed to remove ANY of it.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 04:54 PM
9

The National Organization of Restoring Men
/r/MensRights28/03/17 01:51 PM
8

Watch these in this order. Shortest to longest. The Real Reason You're Circumcised - Adam Ruins Everything - 3:56 What is the Structure & Function of The Foreskin? (Circumcision) - 19:20 Circumcision: The Whole Story - 19:44 Child Circumcision: An Elephant in the Hospital - 33:33 A Historical and Medical Critique of Circumcision - Dr. Christopher Guest - 1:24:03 Circumcision: At the intersection of Religion, Medicine, and Human Rights - John Geisheker - 1:26:50 Changes in infants - Image Claims …
/r/MensRights27/03/17 04:38 PM
1

All males born defective and require corrective surgery at birth.... Yeah... doesn't pass the shit test.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 02:00 PM
3

Wow, I didn't even notice he linked to the circumfetishist pedophile Brian Morris. http://intactwiki.org/wiki/Brian_J._Morris
/r/MensRights27/03/17 05:42 AM
3

Every baby boy who was genitally mutilated was attacked. Your apathy speaks volumes.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 05:40 AM
12

Bodily autonomy is a requirement. If you do not support a mans right to his whole, unmolested body, you do not belong in a mens rights group. You can't be neutral about taking away mens rights, and be in a mens rights space.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 03:23 AM
9

Get the fuck out of the Mens Rights sub then.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 02:48 AM
14

Nope. Sorry. Cutting off healthy, functional genital tissue has no positives. There is no argument to raping and mutilating children. It's an abhorrent human rights violation. The Real Reason You're Circumcised - Adam Ruins Everything - 3:56 What is the Structure & Function of The Foreskin? (Circumcision) - 19:20 Circumcision: The Whole Story - 19:44 Child Circumcision: An Elephant in the Hospital - 33:33 A Historical and Medical Critique of Circumcision - Dr. Christopher Guest - 1:24:03 Circumc…
/r/MensRights27/03/17 02:30 AM
11

Circumcision is rape and genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 11:15 PM
18

There are no benefits to rape and genital mutilation of baby boys.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 11:08 PM
1

Any body part can become diseased or infected. The correct term is intact. We don't call people undecapitated.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 03:54 AM
3

If you don't do it, it's a 0% chance of complication from an unnecessary mutilation.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 03:46 PM
3

100% unavoidable death? That's a pretty fucking shitty statistic.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 02:30 PM
2

Circumcision is not a necessary surgery. Infants are basically jacked off. I'm sorry you don't understand how circumcision works. The foreskin is fused to the glans. A probe must be inserted between the foreskin and glans forcibly to separate the tissue. Circumcision is rape and mutilation.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 02:29 PM
4

Bloodstained Men and Their Friends (donate) is an American based intactivist (anti-genital mutilation) group that tours the US and protests. They bring a lot of awareness to the movement. Bloodstained Men and Their Friends (Facebook) Saving Our Sons (donate). Intactivist related. Saving Our Sons (Facebook) Your Whole Baby (donate). Intactivist related. Your Whole baby (Facebook) Intact America (donate). Intactivist related. Intact America (Facebook)
/r/MensRights25/03/17 02:21 PM
2

Stimulating an infants genitals and inserting tools is rape. If I did it to you, it'd be rape.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 04:02 AM
6

I know it does. Removal of sensory receptors leads to less sensory input.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 03:54 AM
12

You see nothing wrong with stealing a part of a mans penis? You have adverse side effects, you've just normalized them because it's what you've always lived with.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 09:29 PM
7

FROM: http://chiminix.deviantart.com/art/Infant-Circumcision-logic-532426019 "If a parent has every right to arbitrarily remove a healthy part of their kid's genitalia, on what basis can they be refused the removal of other healthy body parts? Face it, unless it's for a legitimate medical reason or it's done by a man's own volition, this procedure makes absolutely no sense. I addressed some common pro-circ arguments on a separate image, and I'm too lazy to repeat myself so here you go: fav.me/d8…
/r/MensRights23/03/17 02:03 PM
4

Foreskin is fused to the glans. It must be ripped apart.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 11:02 PM
3

Cutting off pieces of a kids dick is reasonable? What the fuck?
/r/MensRights22/03/17 01:57 PM
4

Inflicting trauma to associate it with the penis.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 01:52 PM
6

Colorblind people don't know what they're missing.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 01:51 PM
5

My usual copy paste of information: The Real Reason You're Circumcised - Adam Ruins Everything - 3:56 What is the Structure & Function of The Foreskin? (Circumcision) - 19:20 Circumcision: The Whole Story - 19:44 Child Circumcision: An Elephant in the Hospital - 33:33 A Historical and Medical Critique of Circumcision - Dr. Christopher Guest - 1:24:03 Circumcision: At the intersection of Religion, Medicine, and Human Rights - John Geisheker - 1:26:50 Changes in infants - Image Claims of curing ov…
/r/MensRights19/03/17 01:44 PM
7

Agreed.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 09:36 PM
3

I'm saying there's doctors that are surgical fetishists and circumfetishists. What better position to be in to exert their dominance and power?
/r/MensRights18/03/17 08:25 PM
1

Possibly. There are surgical fetishist and circumfetishists though.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 07:58 PM
7

You can't do shit like that intentionally to other people.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 05:36 PM
2

Alcohol sucks. How about a joint?
/r/MensRights18/03/17 05:24 PM
3

Yeah.... genital integrity is a human rights issue. Everyone deserves their whole genitals.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 04:47 PM
3

But then id be hypocritical because i dont agree to dudes using womens bathrooms (identify as another gender) i just dont know man. Comparing using a bathroom to genital mutilation and human rights violations.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 04:40 PM
3

Circumcision is rape. You were making a joke of genital mutilation and belittling the suffering of children. Genital integrity is a HUMAN RIGHTS issue. Everyone deserves their whole body.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 03:38 PM
5

Intentionally spraying in the direction of protesters is attacking them.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 03:18 PM
11

It's an intersection. High visibility. You can't attack people because you don't like their peaceful protest on public property.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 03:10 PM
1

Chill out? While people disregard babies getting raped and mutilated? No thanks. Way to make it about you, and not the babies being harmed.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 03:07 PM
10

Public property. It's at an intersection where cars stop. High visibility.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 02:32 PM
2

Circumfetishist.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 02:30 PM
3

I believe they were getting at that profit is not an issue, it's respecting human rights and voluntary interactions that's the issue.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 02:29 PM
2

Raping and mutilating baby boys is fucking disgusting.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 02:28 PM
1

Your "real life identification" is information, intelligence that people could use to harass or target you. It's for THEIR safety. Not a stretch at all, it's what it is.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 02:28 PM
4

THERE ARE MORE IMPORTANT THINGS... (PS, GET FUCKED)
/r/MensRights18/03/17 02:26 PM
3

Operational security. Preserve their anonymity. Not wanting anyone to find out who they are.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 01:08 PM
8

Circumcision is a religious ritual posing as medicine. It has nothing to do with science.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 12:57 PM
8

This is a big thing I don't understand: Why the fuck does anyone need "scientifically backed up" reasons to understand that cutting off healthy, functional parts of genitals of children is damaging?!
/r/MensRights18/03/17 12:56 PM
5

Human rights activist get banned or shadow banned quite a lot. Also, some people value their OPSEC.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 12:54 PM
2

Formatting is shit. Shared for content.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 03:04 AM
8

Dealing with cutters, it's hard to distinguish at times. Thanks for the /s It's also fucking mind boggling how any MRA is FOR MGM.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 03:03 AM
16

Stimulating an infants genitals and inserting tools is rape. If I did it to you, it'd be rape.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 01:43 AM
14

Google "neonatal fibroblasts." Steve Harvey - Foreskin cream PS - FUCK OPRAH
/r/MensRights18/03/17 01:21 AM
26

Well, genital mutilation and rape is pretty fucking abhorrent.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 01:07 AM
9

And fixing botches, prescribing viagra for ED, treating infections, etc.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 01:06 AM
17

¯_(ツ)/¯ W T F ¯\(ツ)_/¯ "The ritual, which involves a mohel sucking the blood from the incision on an infant’s penis, is permitted under the deal as long as infected mohels are identified then banned from the practice." But not banning sucking baby penis... ¯_(ツ)/¯ W T F ¯\(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights17/03/17 04:14 AM
5

https://archive.is/CJtcX
/r/MensRights17/03/17 04:13 AM
8

http://www.britshalom.info/ Babies aren't religious. You can't practice your religion on other people. Rape and mutilation are not protected religious rituals.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 02:01 AM
6

Always point out the fact that circinfo is written by the circumfetishist Brian Morris. http://intactwiki.org/wiki/Brian_J._Morris
/r/MensRights17/03/17 01:59 AM
5

Culture, religion, medical fraud, shamed into it, disease (rare). Why are babies circumcised? BECAUSE THEY CAN'T SAY NO!
/r/MensRights09/03/17 01:27 AM
5

No disease. No issue. No treatment. Cutting healthy, functional, genital tissue violates the most basic ethics of medicine.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 02:59 PM
1

Ask this guy. http://thecircumcisionlawyer.com/ Specifically: http://thecircumcisionlawyer.com/verdicts/
/r/MensRights01/03/17 01:11 PM
1

It has been fought and won, and will continue to.
/r/MensRights28/02/17 04:17 PM
15

Arguably, all non-necessary circumcisions are botched. They're not recorded as such. There's no true answer because it is not tracked.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 04:11 AM
2

Is this released or a pre-sale?
/r/MensRights27/02/17 03:20 AM
5

All circumcisions are botched.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 02:36 AM
3

Even EXTREME cases can be treated without surgery! https://phimosisjourney.wordpress.com/pictures NSFW
/r/MensRights27/02/17 02:35 AM
2

Agreed.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 02:33 AM
3

FGM was banned in 1997. Under equal protection laws, it is illegal. It's CULTurally practiced. Boys born after can sue.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 02:17 AM
3

It was legal until 1997. Any male born after can sue anyone who mutilates him.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 02:17 AM
4

Phimosis is only diagnosed in post pubescent males.
/r/MensRights26/02/17 11:15 PM
5

Legally, it'snot. It's just CULTurally practiced. Equality laws extend protection to boys.
/r/MensRights26/02/17 11:14 PM
3

I don't think you'd ever say the same thing about females. Thus my comment.
/r/MensRights26/02/17 11:14 PM
4

"In the end it's still the parents call because the daughter can't make the decision, but I think the good parent thing to do is educate the daughter on the differences, teach her how to clean properly being uncircumcised, and let her make the decision later in life should he want to."
/r/MensRights26/02/17 09:22 PM
5

Phimosis isn't diagnosed in infants. How old were you? The foreskin may be fused to the glans up into later puberty. http://www.drmomma.org/2010/01/phony-phimosis-diagnosis.html
/r/MensRights26/02/17 09:17 PM
12

Don't rape or mutilate babies in any form or fashion.
/r/MensRights25/02/17 02:46 AM
1

0/0
/r/MensRights24/02/17 06:08 AM
1

Definitions aren't your strong suit are they?
/r/MensRights23/02/17 11:07 PM
3

An inch up is not the base.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 11:02 PM
11

When you mutilate the penis, you are removing about half the penile length. The skin is stretched and not where it should be, this is obvious logic.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 10:32 PM
4

Hair grows around lips and eyes and nipples, shitty comparison. Genital mutilation damages the penis. The skin is not where it should be.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 10:24 PM
5

It's not supposed to. Are you circumcised?
/r/MensRights23/02/17 10:17 PM
2

It's simulating a foreskin. Like someone getting a prosthetic, learning to walk again. You're very lonely aren't you?
/r/MensRights23/02/17 10:01 PM
2

You said "how you get your foreskin back" No, I didn't. I'm saying it's the title of the video. Comprehension much?
/r/MensRights23/02/17 04:49 AM
6

Thankful for a smaller, less sensitive, less functional, scarred, dried out, damaged dick? Good for you. There's no benefits to lopping off a piece of your dong. Sorry. Most women don't prefer it, since most of the world isn't cut.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 02:54 AM
2

It's the title of the video. Please pay attention.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 07:01 AM
2

http://www.arclaw.org/resources/articles/is-circumcision-legal-peter-w-adler I believe it is.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 06:59 AM
12

I'd be happier if a boy wasn't knife raped and a woman threatened for trying to save her child from genital mutilation. I'd be happy if if every mutilator was hung in the town square.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 11:15 PM
40

The child was mutilated and she was a victim of the state. Nobody benefited from this.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 10:38 PM
24

Yes. They were dropped after being forced go through a program or get locked in a cage, at the threat of a gun against her head.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 10:32 PM
3

https://aeon.co/essays/are-male-and-female-circumcision-morally-equivalent BTFO
/r/MensRights20/02/17 10:20 PM
2

Try searching for "genital mutilation." Female is promoted the most. Start calling circumcision what it is. Genital mutilation. Male genital mutilation, and female genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 10:19 PM
2

No I didn't. Please do not post lies. It's about restoring some functionality.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 10:07 PM
2

"restores some functionality" I never said anything about nerve growth.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 10:01 PM
1

If kids want to protest, the more power to them. They're teaching their kids to stand up for the rights of others. What's the issue here? Children often know it's wrong to cut off pieces of babies...
/r/MensRights16/02/17 05:24 PM
2

If kids want to protest, the more power to them. They're teaching their kids to stand up for the rights of others. What's the issue here? Children often know it's wrong to cut off pieces of babies...
/r/MensRights16/02/17 05:24 PM
3

Pro-tip OP there is an "intactivism" flair which is specifically for genital integrity activism :) It's a mixture of intact and activism.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 05:23 PM
2

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tissue_expansion should give you some ideas on what to search for. also http://www.nature.com/nrm/journal/v10/n1/box/nrm2597_BX1.html found through: https://phimosisjourney.wordpress.com/2014/11/27/skin/ One mans amazing journey to fix an extreme case of phimosis without surgery.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 05:04 PM
2

Did I say it caused nerve growth? It creates permanent cell growth to restore some functionality.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 05:02 PM
3

"promote anti-circumcision" Anti genital mutilation. Pro bodily autonomy and choice. Far too long? I suppose, if you have the attention span of a gnat. Disregard information before you begin to digest it? Sure thing. How did it not present restoring foreskin in a positive light? Did you watch the video? Please elaborate.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 05:01 PM
2

And, until it's fully developed and vetted, people may not want to take the chance on an experimental procedure. This is a proven, effective method.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 10:54 PM
4

Please, educate yourself. /r/foreskin_restoration/ Stretching the skin induces cell growth.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 10:53 PM
1

Possibly. Or geographical location. It's not even fully developed yet, so this works now.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 09:36 PM
4

Don't want to hear a mans perspective about genital mutilation and solutions to combat it? Thanks for the support. GTFO.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 09:35 PM
5

There is Foregen, but in the meantime, and to those without the ability to receive it, this is a viable solution.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 05:32 PM
1

It's not widely practiced in those places.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 07:05 AM
1

No catching the reference.
/r/MensRights14/02/17 04:04 AM
1

Wikipedia and Snopes are not reliable. Have you checked how biased the male genital mutilation (circumcision) page is? That shit is majorly controlled.
/r/MensRights14/02/17 04:01 AM
1

Did you copy paste some Wikipedia entry that referenced snopes? Wow.
/r/MensRights14/02/17 03:56 AM
3

Here's some information that might be helpful. It's in order, where the first ones are the ones I think are most convincing: Circumcised men found to have higher rates of HIV, SIT's, and genital warts Debunks numerous circumcision myths Circumcision causes lasting psychological trauma aCircumcision decreases sexual pleasure bCircumcision decreases sexual pleasure Circumcised boys are 16-26 times more likely to develop urinary tract problems Neonatal circumcision increases the risk of penile infl…
/r/MensRights13/02/17 01:24 AM
3

I believe it's to show mutilated men what they're missing. No different than any other prosthetic.
/r/MensRights11/02/17 07:36 PM
3

There are regret groups you can become a part of and fight against against this.
/r/MensRights10/02/17 09:39 PM
6

Brian J. Morris Known circumfetishist.
/r/MensRights09/02/17 04:33 AM
4

I get banned from every bump page. They must be ran by all the same people. Apparently their "religion" requires them to mutilate their baby boys.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 05:38 AM
2

Can you think of any related niche subs this might fit in that would get good exposure?
/r/MensRights07/02/17 02:32 PM
3

Do tell me more about this non-Jewish influence. http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/Circumcision-law-blocks-local-bans-2328749.php
/r/MensRights21/01/17 03:03 AM
8

https://www.littleimages.org/circumcision-is-unchristian/ "Behold, I, Paul, tell you that if you be circumcised, Christ will be of no advantage to you." – Gal 5:2 "And even those who advocate circumcision don’t really keep the whole law. They only want you to be circumcised so they can brag about it and claim you as their disciples." – Gal 6:13 "For there are many who rebel against right teaching; they engage in useless talk and deceive people. This is especially true of those who insist on circ…
/r/MensRights21/01/17 02:57 AM
13

Cutting dicks isn't Christian.
/r/MensRights20/01/17 11:12 PM
1

Well, that's not helpful. Might as well edit the other one.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 06:06 AM
1

So, he wasn't retracted and there was no cleaning under his foreskin as a child?
/r/MensRights15/01/17 04:28 AM
2

Were their genitals properly cared for as an infant and child?
/r/MensRights15/01/17 02:03 AM
1

What was the issue/
/r/MensRights15/01/17 01:34 AM
3

Research FGM and then get back to me, not something you "believe" happens to every single one. And, check out these super lucky guys! http://circumcisionharm.org/gallery1.htm NSFW
/r/MensRights14/01/17 12:38 PM
7

Wanna really know the truth? Watch these: What is the Structure & Function of The Foreskin? (Circumcision) - 19:20 Circumcision: The Whole Story - 19:44 Child Circumcision: An Elephant in the Hospital - 33:33 A Historical and Medical Critique of Circumcision - Dr. Christopher Guest - 1:24:03 Circumcision: At the intersection of Religion, Medicine, and Human Rights - John Geisheker - 1:26:50 Changes in infants - Image Claims of curing over time - Image
/r/MensRights13/01/17 04:23 AM
2

They tried, and got an enormous backlash.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 07:27 PM
6

My go to for this stupid comment. https://aeon.co/essays/are-male-and-female-circumcision-morally-equivalent
/r/MensRights12/01/17 07:26 PM
2

Wish it were longer, but oh well. American Circumcision comes out later this year :)
/r/MensRights12/01/17 07:16 PM
2

When you says it mentions circumcision slightly, does that mean there is a small section devoted to it, or that it is just mentioned once or twice?
/r/MensRights12/01/17 05:38 PM
4

No dick, nothing to clean! :D
/r/MensRights12/01/17 01:47 AM
3

Did you try anything else before cutting a piece of your dick off?
/r/askTRP08/01/17 10:32 PM
1

I know nothing about the innerworkings of the groups, but Masonry can be found pretty much everywhere, as well as similar groups. Lots of ritual and such and I'm not much for that though.
/r/MensRights07/01/17 04:23 AM
2

Nape!
/r/MensRights07/01/17 03:04 AM
6

I've seen it stated as such. "I CARRIED THEM FOR 9 MONTHS! A LITTLE SNIP WON'T HURT!" Shit is serious psychopathy.
/r/MensRights07/01/17 12:59 AM
1

Hah! That is a highly erogenous zone if I'm not mistaken, that's an excellent spot on the body!
/r/MensRights07/01/17 12:12 AM
10

I was going to make a post about, "Are there any feminist groups that protest against MGM? I'd like a recommendation." And see the ensuing BUT MUH FGM IS SO MUCH WORSE DEY AINT DA SAMES! And see the hypocritical double standards.
/r/MensRights06/01/17 11:28 PM
12

Meh, not a loss. I am actually banned from there, just checked. Is it an auto ban because I post here? I've been banned from all kinds of subs for speaking about MGM.
/r/MensRights06/01/17 11:17 PM
1

I'm more of a clavicle man myself :P Why must men always be relegated to being an ass or tits!? /s
/r/MensRights06/01/17 11:00 PM
3

Looks like its aim worked, regardless ;)
/r/MensRights06/01/17 10:01 PM
1

Not irrelevant. Are you Jewish? Is this why you have such an issue with anyone bringing their heinous practice up?
/r/MensRights04/01/17 01:31 AM
2

Circinfo.net is run by a known circumfetishist. http://www.intactwiki.org/wiki/Brian_J._Morris
/r/MensRights03/01/17 10:49 PM
2

Yeah, I haven't delved into it, but his anti genital mutilation videos are great.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 07:12 PM
4

I tried posting in there. It's such shit.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 07:05 PM
1

NSFW http://circumcisionharm.org/gallery1.htm
/r/TheRedPill02/01/17 06:08 AM
3

People that choked on the red pill.
/r/TheRedPill02/01/17 06:06 AM
5

Vestigial? You know it has a purpose and function, right?
/r/MensRights02/01/17 04:36 AM
3

Nice quoting circinfo.net, which is run by a known circumfetishist pedophile :)
/r/MensRights02/01/17 04:34 AM
6

Routine infant circumcision under the guise of being a medical practice.
/r/MensRights01/01/17 02:03 PM
3

Not for medical reasons, and not to infants.
/r/MensRights01/01/17 02:02 PM
2

You know how many people are in this world? Muslims don't routinely cut their infants, and it's not for medical reasons either.
/r/MensRights01/01/17 02:01 PM
12

Routine infant circumcision certainly is. Aside from Jews, which has nothing to do with "medical" reasons.
/r/MensRights01/01/17 02:45 AM
1

I see you archive a lot. If you use Chrome, check out Archiveror. It has a button for archiving to Archive.is, Archive.org, Webcitation.org and local copy. It even archives bookmarks automatically.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 05:45 AM
3

hahahahaahah yep, fucking choked on the red pill.
/r/TheRedPill31/12/16 01:47 AM
2

Absolute horseshit. How the fuck trp endorsed? Did you swallow and choke on the pill?
/r/TheRedPill31/12/16 01:47 AM
10

Harmless? http://circumcisionharm.org/gallery1.htm
/r/MensRights31/12/16 01:29 AM
6

Breaking the cycle.
/r/MensRights28/12/16 07:42 PM
4

You do not belong in a mens rights sub while actively promoting the violation of mens rights.
/r/MensRights28/12/16 07:41 PM
4

Circumcision is physical, sexual assault....
/r/MensRights27/12/16 05:18 PM
15

What sub? I get banned from a lot of bullshit safe spaces for calling shit out or just because I post in here. "YOU POST IN MENSRIGHTS!" "Well, it seems to be the only place I can share things and have conversations..." "BANNED!" "Thanks for proving my fucking point."
/r/MensRights25/12/16 04:31 PM
1

I consider circumcision rape, or sexual assault. The last part of your comment makes sense. Excellent chess move.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 08:38 PM
23

Violates the rights of the child though.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 04:27 PM
3

I'm not. They're very similar practices done for the same reason. Child Circumcision: An Elephant in the Hospital - 33:33 Explains it very well.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/16 04:15 AM
3

Subjectively you may not feel like it. Objectively, you are. I'm not trying to down, I'm just letting you know anatomical facts. What is the Structure & Function of The Foreskin? (Circumcision) All of that is destroyed when the genitals are cut. Hearing you say you're not damaged is much like a victim of female genital mutilation saying that they are not damaged.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/16 04:03 AM
3

All men who had this done without choosing it were permanently damaged. This is a fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/16 03:18 AM
3

"who understand the damage done"
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/16 02:40 AM
3

That's fine you're okay with it. And, no, most guys who understand the damage done are not okay with it. Many are attempting to restore their foreskin. Although it won't be like the original, it does restore some functionality. It's not MRA to want baby boys to be protected from genital mutilation. It's not MRA to want boys to be able to have their whole body. That's simple human rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/16 01:21 AM
2

Baby girls genitals are protected. Baby boys should be as well. Not hyperbole. Truth. Male genital mutilation is a human rights violation. Many female genital mutilation victims have no problems in life and don't mind it. Doesn't change the fact that it's a violation of their bodily autonomy. But, sure, go ahead and dismiss male suffering like everyone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/16 09:00 PM
1

Ah, gotcha. RES made it look like it was just an image link. Thanks.
/r/MensRights16/12/16 08:12 PM
2

No, it's actually saying that it's hardly ever done to NEWBORNS. This is within the first months of life. Routine infant cutting is what this graph is describing.
/r/MensRights16/12/16 08:02 PM
1

Link to article?
/r/MensRights16/12/16 07:55 PM
2

Yeah, I disagree with the brit milah and all that, but this has nothing to do with society or women being against men. It is absolutely perpetrated by one sub-section of men against other men. Also, it doesn't affect the overwhelming majority of society, let alone all men. Bullshit. A mans rights are violated straight from the womb. All men are permanently damaged by this.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/16 07:52 PM
3

There is no merit to cutting healthy, functional genital tissue of infants.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 10:02 PM
2

It's not small. Slavery is claiming ownership over someones body, which is done when harvesting flesh from them.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 04:04 PM
1

Awesome that you had a doctor that didn't want to cut you right away!
/r/MensRights14/12/16 03:40 PM
2

Abortion is a different topic, and has many more variables.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 03:10 PM
2

Either stance on abortion, you cannot be for circumcision.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 02:58 PM
2

I was just clarifying that phimosis cannot be diagnosed in children. The foreskin is fused to the head of the penis possibly until latter puberty. Improper care of forcibly retracting causes issues. How did you go about clearing up yours?
/r/MensRights14/12/16 02:50 PM
3

I find it absurd that men advocate for the violation of mens rights.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 02:37 PM
1

I worked in a rural hospital for a bit and the conditions and practices were absolutely abhorrent.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 01:50 PM
4

You're comparing the "worst" with the "best." Boys are also done with dull knives and stones.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 12:42 PM
3

Looks like you need an anatomy lesson: What is the Structure & Function of The Foreskin? (Circumcision) - 19:20 DAMAGE
/r/MensRights14/12/16 12:33 PM
2

Phimosis is the natural state of children. The foreskin separates later into puberty. www.yourwholebaby.org/basic-intact-care/
/r/MensRights14/12/16 12:31 PM
7

$ is the purpose. Scalpel happy doctors.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 12:28 PM
7

The freedom of religion argument makes no sense. Babies aren't religious. You can't practice your religion on other people.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 12:22 PM
7

Yet, you support violence against male children. Babies aren't religious, you violate their freedom of religion. You can't practice your religion on other people. Cutting a piece of your dick off does not reduce HIV transmission.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 12:21 PM
1

It's okay, I know it's hard for some to look and accept the damage.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 12:32 AM
1

Way to completely disregard the suffering of men. http://circumcisionharm.org/gallery1.htm Piercing an ear does not mutilate the organ. Circumcision does.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 12:25 AM
5

It's a mutation from the norm.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 10:02 PM
6

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aposthia Extremely rare.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 09:53 PM
6

All males are born with a foreskin. It's standard equipment.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 09:47 PM
9

Foreskin is a normal part of anatomy. Those other things are not. You really, really suck at this comparison / analogy thing.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 09:42 PM
7

Awesome how you can understand how your future sons sex life and wants and needs are.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 09:41 PM
3

Anatomy lesson: What is the Structure & Function of The Foreskin? (Circumcision) - 19:20
/r/MensRights13/12/16 09:39 PM
5

Maybe this will help: www.sexasnatureintendedit.com/10F/Foreskin_Functions.html
/r/MensRights13/12/16 09:35 PM
4

What is the Structure & Function of The Foreskin? (Circumcision) - 19:20 Please, watch this and take note.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 09:11 PM
5

It is mutilation. It does change the function of the penis. Both are correct.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 08:57 PM
5

Where did you get your definition from? Female genital mutilation victims are not completely dysfunctional. Mutilate: verb (used with object), mutilated, mutilating. to injure, disfigure, or make imperfect by removing or irreparably damaging parts
/r/MensRights13/12/16 08:31 PM
9

Getting sick? What was the diagnosis? Doesn't justify doing it to healthy children. It doesn't reduce those things, even if it did, babies don't have sex. Cut off your hand, reduce hand cancer. Phimosis cannot be diagnosed in children. And if you cut off the foreskin, no shit you can't get phimosis or paraphimosis, there's no foreskin. That can be treated without surgery, or non-circumcision surgery.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 08:29 PM
9

Whichever your stance is on abortion, you can't be for circumcision. I'm mainly team human. The topic is circumcision.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 08:27 PM
12

Getting sick? What was the diagnosis? There is no benefits to cutting a healthy child.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 08:17 PM
6

I didn't say anything about them using their mouth. Are you seriously trying to justify mutilating and sucking an infants penis?
/r/MensRights13/12/16 08:15 PM
9

It's a deep dark one. How about the fact that they sell foreskins to medical and cosmetic companies?
/r/MensRights13/12/16 08:10 PM
6

www.intactwiki.org/wiki/Circumfetish Ever heard of "scalpel happy" doctors?
/r/MensRights13/12/16 08:08 PM
4

But, all males are born with a foreskin, unless a birth defect is present.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 08:08 PM
10

I assume you've never heard of: www.intactwiki.org/wiki/Circumfetish
/r/MensRights13/12/16 08:07 PM
15

I don't blame them until they start defending it with bullshit and push it on children.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 08:05 PM
6

I've heard rape victims express the sentiment. What do you call stimulating an infants genitals and removing a part of their healthy body? Rape? Sexual assault?
/r/MensRights13/12/16 07:59 PM
10

Circumcision is rape. No, they don't function as well, or the same. You need anatomy lesson: What is the Structure & Function of The Foreskin? (Circumcision) - 19:20
/r/MensRights13/12/16 05:55 PM
6

Small piece? https://imgur.com/lAQrPV7 Also, it ruins the function of the penis. What is the Structure & Function of The Foreskin? (Circumcision) - 19:20
/r/MensRights13/12/16 05:53 PM
9

Hygiene is a myth.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 05:39 PM
9

The penis does not function as it normally would. There is nothing cleaner about a cut dick. Yes, to each his own. Whoever has the penis, decides what happens with it. Looks like you need an anatomy lesson. What is the Structure & Function of The Foreskin? (Circumcision) - 19:20
/r/MensRights13/12/16 05:31 PM
13

Anyone can play "what's worse." It's the fact that it's not necessary and deprives a person of their functional penis.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 05:00 PM
7

Horrific.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 05:00 PM
4

The right to his whole body.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 04:59 PM
5

Completely ignorant.... right?
/r/MensRights13/12/16 04:22 PM
6

They say it's easier to clean? They were intact, then got cut? I am cut. I have seen the damage. I have read about mens problems. I know what the issues are. Seriously watch this: Child Circumcision: An Elephant in the Hospital And watch the other videos I posted. It's not about you. It's about the child having the right to HIS body. Don't take his choice away from him.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 04:22 PM
7

You're being dishonest, and parroting things people have said. You cannot say it's easier to clean if you haven't had the other. Your "natural" state might be discomfort, and you've just lived with it. Check the videos I posted. I'm glad your happy with your body, but do not mutilate any chlidren you have.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 04:12 PM
9

Somebody hacked off a piece of your penis and you see nothing wrong with it....?
/r/MensRights13/12/16 04:07 PM
11

You didn't know what you were doing though, right?
/r/MensRights13/12/16 03:57 PM
8

Do you know what procedure he did?
/r/MensRights13/12/16 03:54 PM
9

I was unaware that "dissociative shock" was a coined term. In Google, with quotes "dissociative shock" gives me 2,050 results, it's not that well known, or at least, not that well uploaded. I made the term up, combing the definitions.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 03:51 PM
11

He was in shock. He dissociated. 2 cookies for google c/p
/r/MensRights13/12/16 03:47 PM
16

Shock. He went into dissociative shock. He'll also have to live with it the rest of his life. That's torture.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 03:41 PM
9

You've never seen a circumcision, have you? Watch one, full screen, full volume.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 03:38 PM
19

"A cure in search of a disease."
/r/MensRights13/12/16 03:30 PM
13

Cutting a healthy child is mutilation. It fits every bit of the definition.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 12:05 PM
7

No high horse here. Just sharing information.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 11:02 AM
5

Intact penis education: What is the Structure & Function of The Foreskin? (Circumcision) - 19:20
/r/MensRights13/12/16 10:33 AM
6

It took me 27 years to realize what happened. Then everything started to make sense.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 07:02 AM
8

I feel for you. I've had maybe one or two friends actually empathize with me about this issue.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 06:57 AM
2

What techniques have you been using, I need to look into this.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 06:54 AM
13

You've just made a perfect fucking example of what he was talking about. Congratulations.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 06:53 AM
1

How old?
/r/MGTOW06/12/16 07:24 PM
1

Did you try anything else? Even extreme cases can be fixed without surgery. https://phimosisjourney.wordpress.com/pictures/ NSFW
/r/MGTOW06/12/16 07:18 PM
2

Yeah, I figure I'd just account hop once I wore it out. Modarefags. Keep pushing info.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 07:14 PM
1

"my penis wasn't quite working right" What problem? What issue?
/r/MGTOW06/12/16 07:05 PM
1

Wasn't told that. How can I verify?
/r/MGTOW06/12/16 07:05 PM
1

What was the issue?
/r/MGTOW06/12/16 06:55 PM
2

Fuck yeah. I got banned from like 3-4 subs for this lol.
/r/MGTOW06/12/16 06:54 PM
0

You're STILL apologizing for the mutilator. Are you this fucking dense? G E T F U C K E D
/r/MensRights06/12/16 06:45 PM
0

Using it against me, sticking up for a baby mutilator. A P O L O G I S T Y'all some weak motherfuckers who don't support people in here.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 06:39 PM
1

Sticking up for people who mutilate babies.... for money..... Yeah.... You JUST posted it.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 06:35 PM
1

" when people were asking for evidence he never gave any and then told people to go die in a fire." AND THENNNNNNNNNNNNN Yeah, people who harm babies SHOULD die in a fire. What the fuck is up with you mutilation apologists? Is this fucking bizzaro world or something? At this point anything with mike shits his pants is just fucking absurd because he abused his fucking power, and banned me from other things that had nothing to do with it. It's a blatant overreach of power and I have fucking mutila…
/r/MensRights06/12/16 06:32 PM
-2

What was it like taking that goat from behind? Get fucked.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 06:21 PM
0

So, will you FINALLY answer my question?
/r/MensRights06/12/16 06:11 PM
1

I'd like to see where I told them to die in a fire when they asked for evidence. No amount of evidence for anything gives you the right to cut off healthy, functional tissue off a child. Just think about it, how much evidence would you need to cut off a little girls clitoris? How much would you need to cut off her labias? OFF OF EVERY BABY GIRL BORN. EVERYDAY.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 06:04 PM
1

Dumpster diving you can find gems. I didn't say it was useless.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 06:02 PM
0

Yeah....... go check out the thread in /r/news. You're welcome.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 06:00 PM
2

They acted like a complete fuckass abusing their power. Of course I'm going to insult the cum guzzler. What the fuck is up with all of these apologists? Reddit is definitely trash.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 05:58 PM
2

There is nothing bigoted about being against genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 05:56 PM
-1

Don't tell me how I show display myself. I work different, in different situations. Sometimes being crass is needed, sometimes being gentle is needed. Right now, a fuck you is needed for the lack of solidarity you shitheel.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 05:55 PM
2

Even extreme cases can be fixed without surgery. https://phimosisjourney.wordpress.com/pictures/ NSFW
/r/MensRights06/12/16 05:52 PM
-2

I get banned for speaking about it. I get banned for asking simple questions. Oh my. Don't associate the power tripping fucknugget for anyone you should need to suck up to.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 05:37 PM
1

Yep, power weilding fuckboy. You know you're just harming your fellow man, right?
/r/MensRights06/12/16 05:32 PM
1

Not trolling. You an literally look at the thread where the mod ignores conversation, so I tell him to get fucked because he's not answering a legitimate question.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 05:32 PM
1

You didn't answer you shit head, and you insulted the user. You're just a fucking power wielding fuckass who gets off to it. Why the fuck did you ban me if I can get unbanned literally anytime? So, unban me. Poof! And give me mod powers while you're at it :D
/r/MensRights06/12/16 05:24 PM
2

Well, if you want equality. Clitoral hood removal from baby girls would be on the table. They're very, very similar procedures.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 05:23 PM
1

Said the people not doing anything. hahaha, weak as fuck. 5 years and that's all you got? Check my 3 months. That's activism.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 05:19 PM
1

Look, I get it, you're one of the people who told the anti-slavery people to shut up, that they weren't doing anything. You're the person who says oh look at them not doing anything, WHILE YOU'RE RIDING MY FUCKING WAVE. Get fucked. Where are all these mutilation apologists coming from? Mensrights has seriously gotten fucking weak.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 05:13 PM
3

https://web.archive.org/web/20160627032154/http://blog.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk/2014/02/female-genital-mutilation-and-male-circumcision-time-to-confront-the-double-standard/ There's always the waybackmachine :)
/r/MensRights06/12/16 04:33 PM
3

Link redirects. Would like to read.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 03:38 PM
3

Get ununfucked!
/r/MensRights06/12/16 03:35 PM
3

I posted for about half a day straight. Keeping the post count up, replying to people and it's slowly worked it's way up. If I wouldn't have said anything, nothing would have happened. And look at it now.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 03:16 PM
3

The correct term is Intact, or unintact. You don't call someone undecapitated. Get fucked.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 03:09 PM
2

They're very, very similar. They're done on homologous organs. ERRRRR Wrong answer. Your cultural bias is flaring up. MGM is just as damaging as FGM. Making FGM illegal harms mother's rights..... You don't have rights over another persons body. End of story.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 02:12 PM
2

You don't agree people have the right to their whole body? Your body is definitely private property. Ever heard of "private parts"? FGM and MGM are quite similar. So, ban MGM and it'll speed up the processs..... Facts don't factor into religious zealots and CULT practices and false "medical" information pushed by "doctors" of the cult.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 02:05 PM
3

Kinda like banning female genital mutilation? Think that should be repealed then? I agree with no authoritarian rules, but this breaks non violence and aggression factors. It's destroying someones ultimate private property, their body. And how exactly are you gonna affect cultural change if you don't ruffle some feathers and get people thinking?
/r/MensRights06/12/16 01:58 PM
1

Yeah, I've seen that. I just hit the search for specific threads here. All the mains have turned to shit.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 01:55 PM
-2

You see the post count and vote count? I spent time doing that. Quit your bitching and fucking do something. Punk ass fucker. What the fuck are you doing in mensrights if you're not fighting for them?
/r/MensRights06/12/16 12:34 PM
0

I pretty much did have conversations with people that weren't talking about hacking up healthy babies. So, yeah, get fucked. It's not literally the easiest thing to convince people on. This is a sick cultish practice that's been ingrained into people over generations. It takes all kinds of ways to wake people up. Some people are heavy sleepers and need a louder alarm clock.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 12:07 PM
3

Any male who had their genitals cut without consent for a non-medical reason was mutilated. Fuck your tactic policing about male genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 11:23 AM
6

Banned for "vitriol" Well... I hope they banned everyone else supporting the mutilating of babies.... I had a good run :) Sucks I can't reply to all the bad information anymore though....
/r/MensRights06/12/16 08:59 AM
15

Shit should be banned everywhere.
/r/MensRights05/12/16 10:59 PM
8

Removing healthy, functional tissue from an infants genitals for profit is HIGHLY unethical. The foreskins are sold to medical and cosmetic companies. Some end up in facial creams. They literally make money off of the pain and suffering of newborn males. What is the Structure & Function of The Foreskin? (Circumcision) [https://youtu.be/6WswMdJggA8] Circumcision: At the intersection of Religion, Medicine, and Human Rights - John Geisheker [https://youtu.be/jm3bo485Qlg] Circumcision: The Whole Sto…
/r/MGTOW05/12/16 10:45 PM
1

Unnecessary circumcisions. Which 99.999% are.
/r/MGTOW05/12/16 09:28 AM
0

This guy is a fucking idiot who mutilates children for money. He has zero ethics or intelligence.
/r/MensRights05/12/16 09:16 AM
3

Even extreme cases can be treated without surgery. https://phimosisjourney.wordpress.com/pictures/ NSFW
/r/MGTOW05/12/16 04:55 AM
1

It is quite long, but as I mentioned, on a blog or website this would be great reading with graphics dividing it up. Putting a link to the first post above would be nice too.
/r/MGTOW05/12/16 02:51 AM
2

Great read. I'd like to see this complied on a website, or blog when you're finished.
/r/MGTOW05/12/16 01:55 AM
1

Abortion does not equal circumcision. But, either stance on abortion, you can't be for circumcision.
/r/MensRights04/12/16 10:57 PM
1

Fully employed. 24/7.
/r/MensRights04/12/16 03:20 AM
1

Study the mind of mutilators. Could write a book on it.
/r/MensRights04/12/16 02:54 AM
2

Bullshit. Not harmless. Not routine for most of the world. Complete violation of ethics and medicine.
/r/MensRights04/12/16 02:45 AM
2

He's still cutting babies, and lacks ethics.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 07:21 PM
1

Instead of condemning me for fighting, join me. That's what I mean about being an apologist. Instead of your two useless posts, you could be spreading awareness and information.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 06:41 PM
3

Mutilators = Garbage
/r/MensRights03/12/16 06:39 PM
1

Guess you've met someone more adamant than you. Fighting for human rights is not being a SJW. Don't get all apologist on me.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 06:32 PM
1

Keyword: Training.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 06:22 PM
1

http://circumcisionharm.org/gallery1.htm
/r/MensRights03/12/16 06:21 PM
1

It would alleviate a huge amount of issues, but it would take generations before we saw the effects.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 06:11 PM
1

Stuff that actually helps with pain, not being flayed alive without any pain relief drugs. Yes, they cut babies wide open without any pain management. Some collapse lungs. Some vomit. Some herniate.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 06:10 PM
1

It's not a think, it's a know. I've told you my side effects. Either you're a massive,massive troll, or a very, very sick individual.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 06:00 PM
1

Evidentally not, since you perform non-necessary, non-medical procedures on healthy infants genitals.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 05:59 PM
1

You never began to make sense.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 05:58 PM
2

Anyone who was cut at birth, without their consent, for no immediate medical issue, was mutilated.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 05:58 PM
2

Yes, there is. http://www.noharmm.org/femcirctech.htm The more you know.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 05:57 PM
1

Not on penis or ethics.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 05:52 PM
1

If your cut, you have, and do. Unless you wear a penis cover or something. You cannot be serious about being in any type of medical field or training, you don't know jack shit.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 05:50 PM
1

Massive medical fraud harming children, yeah, it's a systemic violation that harms the entirety of humanity.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 05:49 PM
1

You have no concept of ethics, so that's not surprising you'd say that.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 05:48 PM
1

At least you can get proper pain management.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 05:48 PM
1

No wonder America is so fucked.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 05:46 PM
2

It's cargo cult science performing a blood ritual. Damn, that's beautiful.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 05:46 PM
3

Every single person without a foreskin develops it.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 05:44 PM
1

I've already responded to this. The medical fraud, losing a part of my body. People like you who are allowed to harm children under the guise of medicine.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 05:43 PM
3

Laughing at victims of male genital mutilation. You definitely are a sick fuck.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 05:42 PM
2

So, you do female circumcisions? I'm mad at people who do medical fraud and cut healthy babies because of their ignorance and lack of ethics.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 05:39 PM
4

I'm not picking fights. I'm educating people, but they ban because they can't handle the truth about mutilating people.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 05:36 PM
2

They left out ethics and anatomy of the penis.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 05:34 PM
1

raises both hands
/r/MensRights03/12/16 05:30 PM
1

Either stance on abortion cannot be for circumcision.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 05:30 PM
5

Everyone remembers. Subconscious or not. The body remembers. I remember every time I see the horrible scar on my dick. http://imgur.com/lAQrPV7
/r/MensRights03/12/16 05:29 PM
5

You are comparing the "worst" with the "best". There are male circumcisions done in the bush, with rocks. There are female circumcisions done by medical experts in sterile environments. You really have no clue what the fuck you are talking about. There are just as much medical indication for female cutting as there is male.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 05:28 PM
11

The worst part is me not having my whole body and a chunk was removed for no good reason. If you remove the foreskin, the glans dries out. It becomes even MORESO. It callouses up. The glans is supposed to be soft, and supple. I cannot believe a "doctor" doesn't know this. What is the Structure & Function of The Foreskin? (Circumcision) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6WswMdJggA8&feature=youtu.be
/r/MensRights03/12/16 07:54 AM
6

Haven't really talked to much about my parents about it. Well, for one, all the negatives of removing the foreskin. Dried out glans, desensitization, keritinization, hair being farther up on my shaft. Luckily I haven't suffered the worst parts of circumcision, yet.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 07:37 AM
11

As hard as it may be for your circumfetishist self to understand, I am a cut male that hates it who understands that cutting healthy tissue from a childs fully functional genitals is a human rights violation. End genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 07:04 AM
6

Mass amount of male shaming.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 06:22 AM
3

freaks abound
/r/MensRights03/12/16 04:30 AM
8

Anyone who harms babies, deserves it.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 04:30 AM
3

It's a thing. Cut happy doctors, and freaks abound. http://www.intactwiki.org/wiki/Circumfetish So please, think more about it before you question my knowledge on male genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 04:27 AM
3

Just reason it out. Circumcision fetishist.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 04:14 AM
2

It's a pretty sick, fucked up thing.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 04:11 AM
7

This is not a agree to disagree. This is you being culturally blinded, and perhaps a circumfetishist scalpel happy cutter.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 04:08 AM
3

What other healthy body parts are you allowed to harvest from babies? There are no reasons to cut healthy, functional genital tissue.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 04:07 AM
4

There is no medical reason to cut healthy babies. There actually have been studies showing reduction in issues for females with circumcision. But, you wouldn't start cutting females, since it's been illegal since 1996 in the US.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 04:04 AM
2

A person who has an agenda of cutting babies is not going to change their mind when they make money out of it. They possible are even circumfestishist cut happy "doctors". The best thing to do is out them, and expose them.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 03:50 AM
7

So, if a guardian chose to give a baby girl breast implants, signed for it... nobody would sue? Or female circumcision? Hmm... somehow I doubt that. And, you have done harm. Anytime you cut a healthy baby boy, you harm. Also, violates the most basic tenets of ethics and medicine. You are not a doctor.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 03:47 AM
2

You do what works for you, I'll do what works for me. Make waves however you see that you should.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 03:46 AM
9

If you cut the foreskin off of healthy babies, you are mutilating them.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 03:44 AM
5

I wish you weren't mutilating children.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 03:43 AM
5

You can't circumcise baby girls, or give them breast implants. You can't cosmetically alter baby boys penis. It's medical fraud. And you can be sued.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 03:42 AM
2

Removing healthy, functional, tissue from infants is fraud. No other body parts are harvested from babies. This culture is fucking SICK.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 03:41 AM
5

Cutting healthy genital tissue from babies is criminal. Where are all of these mutilation apologists coming from?
/r/MensRights03/12/16 03:40 AM
4

"Qualified medical professionals" who hack off healthy body parts from babies? Definitely a mutilation apologist.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 03:39 AM
7

The babies did not sign anything. http://www.thecircumcisionlawyer.com/ Tick tock baby mutilators.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 03:38 AM
3

You chop up healthy babies for money, you're not sane.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 03:37 AM
2

Definitely fraud. Violates the basic tenets of ethics and medicine.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 03:36 AM
9

Medical fraud is removing healthy, functional tissue from healthy babies.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 03:34 AM
5

Meant to silence any outside views Are you a mutilation apologist?
/r/MensRights03/12/16 03:33 AM
9

Hopefully they sue the shit out of you when they find out they're mutilated.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 03:33 AM
7

Meant to silence any outside views, especially ones that make people money.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 03:29 AM
10

I hope they were on willing participants, or for immediate medical issues. As long as they weren't prophylactic removal of healthy tissue from babies, all the good on you. Otherwise that's fraud.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 03:25 AM
7

Then everyone has an agenda and nobody gets to post anything. Isn't that the point of posting? To share information about the things you're interested in?
/r/MensRights03/12/16 03:23 AM
4

Facts are not an agenda.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 03:18 AM
14

Just as I thought. Unwilling to face the horrors of genital mutilation and factual information about the anatomical structures of the penis. Swish
/r/MensRights03/12/16 03:16 AM
16

Unfounded crap? Please address this "unfounded" crap and I will respond.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 03:12 AM
5

https://imgur.com/a/lJ093 Mod also attempts to male body shame. https://imgur.com/a/nwHdB EDIT: Now I've been banned and muted. Genital mutilation is so fucked up.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 02:54 AM
2

Very true. I mean "technically" I may have been warned, but all of my posts were within a VERY short time timeframe before I was able to check, or respond to messages so it should not count as repeated offenses.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 02:13 AM
2

The childs genitals should have been left alone until they were old enough to decide what to do.
/r/MGTOW03/12/16 02:02 AM
3

To be fair, the linking to a lawyer it says not to list to specific legal services. But I did not see this before I posted, and was not warned I was breaking rules before I was banned. I was also accused of continuing to break the rules, but everything I did was before there was any conversation before the ban, not warning, in which I couldn't continue to post them. But, yeah, if the other shit posted wasn't off topic, none of my stuff was.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 01:28 AM
10

Thanks for breaking down the bullshit in the thread. Selective enforcement of what is "on topic." HORRIBLE sub and absolutely abysmal mods.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 01:13 AM
3

Everything was on topic.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 12:54 AM
8

So, apparently you can't link to specific lawyers that's advertising. But I wasn't given a warning, just an immediate ban. The updated ban is: "We don't allow links to specific lawyers here." Also, tons of bad advice about not being able to sue. Genital mutilation is big business... and nobody wants to talk about it...
/r/MensRights03/12/16 12:10 AM
17

https://imgur.com/a/xymNb https://imgur.com/a/KZn2L And now I'm muted. I didn't persist after I was "warned"... I couldn't.... Everything I said was on topic as well. Apparently the reason for ban has been updated YET AGAIN https://imgur.com/a/99QM4 THE SAGE CONTINUES https://imgur.com/a/EPn4K https://imgur.com/a/gVHSs Weeeeeeee https://imgur.com/a/iPrOD Doot doot doot more updates Apparently I'm off topic, and not all the other shit shaming natural male bodies... Yep, definitely targeted. https…
/r/MensRights03/12/16 12:09 AM
3

No. It is criminal. Criminal has more than one meaning.
/r/MGTOW03/12/16 12:03 AM
7

You mean the problem with infant circumcision is that removing healthy, functional tissue is a criminal act.
/r/MGTOW02/12/16 11:40 PM
3

Anything that shows benefits, is promoting it. It's the sad truth of it. Cutting dicks damages it.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 09:09 PM
3

Meh, it should auto append then. If anyone silences opposition to genital mutilation, fuck 'em.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 06:23 AM
8

I think more accurate would be penetration with a large object ruining her genitals. Now THAT definitely wouldn't fly.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 02:57 AM
2

Refuted "evidence." Asked the usual questions you ask cutters with their shitty logic. "Would you scar the child to match the parents?"
/r/MensRights24/11/16 03:06 AM
4

No.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 11:30 PM
3

Even extreme cases can be cured without surgery. https://phimosisjourney.wordpress.com/pictures/ NSFW
/r/MensRights16/11/16 12:54 AM
2

Fully agreed.
/r/MensRights16/11/16 12:53 AM
2

It's an unnecessary modification to an infant.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 06:14 AM
3

I understand the point they're trying to convey about derailing, but the "derailing" of FGM they're talking about is just comparison to similar things that people find acceptable but are just as terrible.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 03:09 AM
11

And neither are the "worst" forms of FGM. Everyone compares the "best" types of MGM in "sterile medical conditions by "professionals"" to the "worst" types of FGM innawoods with a rusty blade.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 03:06 AM
6

Depends on the form. Castration is pretty severe form of MGM.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 03:02 AM
16

Circumcision is best done when a person choose it, or it is medically necessary.
/r/MensRights13/11/16 10:03 AM
6

Exactly, let the child choose and don't force it on them.
/r/MGTOW13/11/16 10:00 AM
2

Have you tried stretching techniques to increase the amount of skin you have?
/r/MGTOW13/11/16 09:57 AM
1

That's basing it on what other people think.... And that's just in your limited, brainwashed cultural perspective.
/r/askTRP11/11/16 12:38 AM
2

So... you're basing how much dick a kid gets to keep on what other people think?
/r/askTRP10/11/16 10:55 AM
1

Do you think female genital cutting ban should be removed then, being for equality and all.
/r/askTRP10/11/16 10:54 AM
3

Bullshit about the hygiene and STDs. Absolutely reduces sensitivity. Cut people cutting people. Just like female circumcision. Break the cycle.
/r/askTRP09/11/16 10:00 PM
2

True. Was more speaking from a brainwashed American standpoint.
/r/askTRP09/11/16 09:58 PM
7

Give baby girls boob jobs!
/r/askTRP09/11/16 07:18 AM
11

There is absolutely no reason to cut a childs healthy, functional genitals. What is the Structure & Function of The Foreskin? (Circumcision) [https://youtu.be/6WswMdJggA8] Circumcision: At the intersection of Religion, Medicine, and Human Rights - John Geisheker [https://youtu.be/jm3bo485Qlg] Circumcision: The Whole Story [https://youtu.be/SeAXantm4tE] A Historical and Medical Critique of Circumcision - Dr. Christopher Guest [https://youtu.be/XwZiQyFaAs0] Child Circumcision: An Elephant in the H…
/r/askTRP09/11/16 07:08 AM
10

It's a violation of a childs body. Completely unnecessary. Nobody argues whether to circumcise their daughters, do they?
/r/askTRP09/11/16 07:07 AM
8

That's bullshit. That is the relative rate and no absolute rate based on faulty science. https://youtu.be/XwZiQyFaAs0?t=1h1m8s
/r/askTRP09/11/16 07:06 AM
5

That doesn't work with religious zealots.
/r/MensRights07/11/16 04:41 AM
6

That's relative rate. Absolute rate is like 1-2% https://youtu.be/XwZiQyFaAs0?t=1h1m8s
/r/MensRights07/11/16 04:35 AM
2

USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!USA!
/r/MensRights02/11/16 12:16 AM
1

;_;
/r/MensRights01/11/16 11:42 PM
2

"Culture" is fucking weird.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 11:41 PM
3

It's a piece of the puzzle, yes.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 11:48 AM
2

I totally fuckin' agree. :]
/r/MensRights01/11/16 11:48 AM
1

"Nobody can show you what it is... you have to see it for yourself." I find a lot of people don't really know what it entails, the people who genuinely care. Other people just appeal to the authority. I'm generally not harsh with people until I've exhausted the routes of consent, non necessity, anatomy points.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 11:15 AM
3

Is female genital mutilation stupid crap? Is abuse stupid crap? This is a horrible practice that fucks with so many things.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 11:12 AM
1

Did a search, didn't find anything. If I saw it again, I'd probably go, "Oh... that."
/r/MensRights01/11/16 11:11 AM
1

It's a pretty shitty meme and I wish it would hurry up and get played out :P
/r/MensRights01/11/16 11:05 AM
1

Different regions? Independently? Definitely aliens.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 08:49 AM
1

Yeah, but those are voluntary. I was fascinated with National Geographic as a child and always wanted to pierce my ears, and eventually stretched them.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 07:29 AM
1

Oh, I get that. But I'm just wondering like, this extreme body modification is the only thing I can think that has persisted this long and so widespread.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 06:55 AM
6

I haven't come across anyone who is against an adults choice for themselves. I've only seen it against children for non-medical reasons.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 06:50 AM
2

It's just... so.... I don't know.... I guess what I'm getting at is how this one specific one (MGM) has survived this long (born in the US, non-Jewish and not super religious parents).
/r/MensRights01/11/16 06:34 AM
3

Haven't seen it, so I can't say anything more than he still has sensory receptors.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 06:17 AM
3

So you can orgasm being castrated?
/r/MensRights01/11/16 05:55 AM
1

Ohhhhh a new video :D Checking it out now.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 05:50 AM
5

Circumcision: At the intersection of Religion, Medicine, and Human Rights - John Geisheker [https://youtu.be/jm3bo485Qlg ] A Historical and Medical Critique of Circumcision - Dr. Christopher Guest [https://youtu.be/XwZiQyFaAs0] These two explain quite a bit. The second has links to topics in the about.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 05:48 AM
2

Well, yeah, but I'm talking about way back before all that. Way, way, way back. Like... who decided it was a good idea to start chopping up their dick? (my entire account is for genital integrity :P)
/r/MensRights01/11/16 05:37 AM
24

How the world got hoodwinked into chopping up children is such a peculiar and horrifying mystery.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 01:42 AM
1

https://imgur.com/a/7dHY7 More attacks.
/r/MensRights28/10/16 01:02 AM
1

I posted multiple comments that you can read in the thread. A specific one was not singled out. Thread
/r/MensRights27/10/16 03:34 AM
1

Didn't specifically state. Just given: (rule 4) Shaming is not okay. If you disagree be civil and respectful. Remember the human and remember that many posters here are dealing with disordered personalities and disordered upbringings.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 03:28 AM
2

Thread Can I request that the AutoModerator just automatically append NP? I also can't respond to them anymore. I was claimed to have violated rule 4 of "shaming" but... I don't see it...
/r/MensRights27/10/16 01:20 AM
1

Thread
/r/MensRights27/10/16 01:14 AM
4

No medical science supports RIC.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 12:11 AM
3

Uhh.... No... So.. you would stretch a babies ear but not cut it off?
/r/MensRights26/10/16 12:06 AM
3

Yep. https://www.littleimages.org/circumcision-is-unchristian/
/r/MGTOW25/10/16 11:07 AM
4

It's actually against Christianity. Jews and Muslims do it religiously, some African cultures, South Koreans picked it up during occupation. A few other places. America is the only place to do it for "medical benefits" (which are lies).
/r/MGTOW25/10/16 09:55 AM
2

Like this? https://imgur.com/lAQrPV7 It's been proven time and time again.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 08:43 AM
7

Due to people speaking out about it an everyone affected and harmed telling their stories.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 08:42 AM
7

Female genital mutilation must not be serious maiming in your eyes either then.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 08:42 AM
4

I implore you to actually research. As hard as this may be for you to accept, I'm a cut man who is unhappy that his choice was taken from him. It's the fact that a part of my body was modified without my consent, for no immediate medical relief that bothers me. And the fact that botched jobs, and babies die every year due to this unnecessary practice.
/r/MGTOW25/10/16 08:13 AM
3

How were you cleaning it? Do you know if you were forcibly retracted as a child? Like I said, an adult having it done for a reason they choose is NOT THE ISSUE. The issue is forcing it on children when there is no issue present. ROUTINE INFANT CIRCUMCISION is the topic, not just outright banning circumcision for ANY reason. Doing it to children for non-medical reasons (which there are very, very few) should not be allowed.
/r/MGTOW25/10/16 06:51 AM
4

GTFO mutilator.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 06:41 AM
4

By definition, it is mutilation. This is about routine infant circumcision (mutilation), not medically necessary circumcisions that adults choose. You won't force your ideas on anyone.... just carving it into children? See how stupid that sounds? MUH PERSONAL CHOICE FER SOMEONE ELSES BODY!
/r/MGTOW25/10/16 06:38 AM
9

Some good information. What is the Structure & Function of The Foreskin? (Circumcision) [https://youtu.be/6WswMdJggA8] Circumcision: At the intersection of Religion, Medicine, and Human Rights - John Geisheker [https://youtu.be/jm3bo485Qlg] Circumcision: The Whole Story [https://youtu.be/SeAXantm4tE] A Historical and Medical Critique of Circumcision - Dr. Christopher Guest [https://youtu.be/XwZiQyFaAs0] Child Circumcision: An Elephant in the Hospital [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ceht-3xu84I]…
/r/MensRights25/10/16 06:32 AM
6

Taking freedom away to modify genitals. Having the freedom to your whole genitals. Pick one.
/r/MGTOW25/10/16 04:25 AM
8

Mutilation of genitals is not parenting.
/r/MGTOW25/10/16 04:25 AM
4

There is no purpose to routine infant circumcision. It also negatively affects the person forever. No. I'm not a doctor, and I don't trust American doctors on circumcision, because most of them are idiots. Please actually research, and learn about the human body. There are no legitimate reasons to cut off healthy, functional genital tissue from infants. Some good information. What is the Structure & Function of The Foreskin? (Circumcision) [https://youtu.be/6WswMdJggA8] Circumcision: At the inte…
/r/MGTOW25/10/16 04:24 AM
4

What do you think of female circumcision? Do you support parents rights to do that. What about tattooing children? Foot binding? There is no reason to cut off healthy, functional genital tissue from an infant.
/r/MGTOW25/10/16 02:20 AM
3

Your freedom to modify someone else's body?
/r/MGTOW25/10/16 12:32 AM
18

Hair also falls out on it's own, foreskin doesn't. Haircuts don't DAMAGE the child.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 06:10 AM
18

Hair grows back. Foreskin doesn't. Hair isn't functional, healthy genital tissue.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 06:05 AM
11

You like the way your modified sexual organ looks. If that is your preference for a child, that's pretty sick.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 05:43 AM
1

Well, if you can do something to another persons body, then do you accept that upon yourself?
/r/MensRights22/10/16 05:38 AM
3

For when a topic mentions circumcision.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 05:37 AM
2

Your argument is legality. If it were legal, you'd accept it, correct?
/r/MensRights22/10/16 05:30 AM
16

That's fine. Don't carve your sexual preference into children.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 05:27 AM
3

lol I don't give a shit about Jews. Jews are just a funny meme to me. Because that stupid fucking delusion of cutting healthy, functional parts of bodies creeped it's way into society as acceptable. It's a fucking plague on humanity. I was cut at birth, without consent, and I'm not Jewish or anything. It has fucking polluted the minds of people for far too long.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 05:07 AM
3

Not most of mankind, just a special "touched" section. Facts trump delusions :)
/r/MensRights22/10/16 05:00 AM
2

It's the psychological undertones of ownership of another persons body which affects everyone. Pretty fucked up TBQH.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 04:51 AM
2

Everyone appropriates everything. Cultures borrow from one another and blend.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 04:47 AM
1

Well... someone tried to...
/r/MensRights22/10/16 04:11 AM
2

Everything was created at some point in time dickknob. That's the thing. Not asking the person getting it done to is fucked up.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 04:11 AM
3

Jews aren't special. I equally hate all mutilators.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 04:10 AM
2

If it were legal to exterminate Jews, you'd be okay with it, correct? Legality != morality.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 04:09 AM
2

[Insert anyone that genocided.] I figure you'd just understand Hitler a little easier.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 04:07 AM
3

Build a baby workshop :) Those 18mil don't want it. They can't.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 03:01 AM
2

Comparing music use to ritualistic blood sacrifice. Wowsers.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 02:58 AM
2

So, do you believe any religion or belief has the right to do WHATEVER THEY WANT to another person? Hitler did nothing wrong, amirite?
/r/MensRights22/10/16 02:57 AM
1

Nobody is asking the baby. They just hack them up.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 02:56 AM
1

Brit Shalom. No cutting of babies is okay.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 02:56 AM
3

But chopping baby dicks isn't odd?
/r/MensRights22/10/16 02:55 AM
3

What is the Structure & Function of The Foreskin? (Circumcision) [https://youtu.be/6WswMdJggA8] Circumcision: At the intersection of Religion, Medicine, and Human Rights - John Geisheker [https://youtu.be/jm3bo485Qlg] Circumcision: The Whole Story [https://youtu.be/SeAXantm4tE] A Historical and Medical Critique of Circumcision - Dr. Christopher Guest [https://youtu.be/XwZiQyFaAs0] Child Circumcision: An Elephant in the Hospital [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ceht-3xu84I] In short, don't do it.…
/r/MensRights22/10/16 02:47 AM
2

My religion says hang all baby mutilators. Respect muh reeliguns
/r/MensRights22/10/16 02:46 AM
4

It's impossible to be informed about male genital mutilation (which is what routine infant circumcision is, or forced circumcision) and claim to be a part of MRM. Taking a man's right to the choice to his body at birth is insane.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 06:33 AM
11

How is a man not being able to make a choice about keeping his whole dick not a men's rights issue?
/r/MensRights21/10/16 06:30 AM
2

F R A C T A L D O G E
/r/MensRights19/10/16 03:33 AM
2

The chemical changes as well as the association of pain while being birthed is my theory. Some babies do not bond with mother's and breastfeed. I think a bond is made between care and pain. Liking abuse. I also believe it may play a role in violence. Damaging the penis alters the way the penis functions. An intact make cannot just "shove" his penis in an orifice due to the possibility of tearing without previous stimulation of a receptive female. A cut male, however, can ram it in any orifice wi…
/r/MGTOW14/10/16 09:46 PM
4

"Law enforcers" don't even follow them...
/r/MensRights08/10/16 01:58 AM
1

It's fucked up to cut healthy functional tissue on children :(
/r/MensRights06/10/16 09:01 PM
2

Cool if you're okay with it. Don't force it on babies.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 08:55 PM
3

They have no idea of anatomy or function of the male genitals. They think it's just a ram rod to deposit sperm.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 06:10 PM
2

They're non-necessary genital modifications done to an individual who did not consent to them.* Is how I'd phrase it. I definitely agree.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 05:55 PM
1

I was circumcised without my consent. I've seen the damage it does. I'm not sure what you're getting at.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 05:53 PM
2

Of course, but if it's for forcibly circumcision children, it's against Mens Rights and it's a stupid "opinion."
/r/MensRights06/10/16 04:44 PM
1

Awesome! :) Thanks for protecting your boy :D
/r/MensRights06/10/16 04:43 PM
5

Circumcising babies is literally against MensRights.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 03:59 PM
3

http://www.yourwholebaby.org/basic-intact-care/ Intact care! Do NOT let the doctor retract the babies foreskin at checkups! Refer to this thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/daddit/comments/55tidh/heartbreak_after_2_year_checkup_a_tale_of_caution/?ref=search_posts
/r/MensRights06/10/16 03:55 PM
5

They're quite similar. https://aeon.co/essays/are-male-and-female-circumcision-morally-equivalent
/r/MensRights06/10/16 03:53 PM
5

Child Circumcision: An Elephant in the Hospital - YouTube [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ceht-3xu84I] Circumcision: At the intersection of Religion, Medicine, and Human Rights - John Geisheker [https://youtu.be/jm3bo485Qlg] http://www.sexasnatureintendedit.com/10F/Foreskin_Functions.html NSFW
/r/MensRights06/10/16 03:52 PM
7

Child Circumcision: An Elephant in the Hospital - YouTube [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ceht-3xu84I] Circumcision: At the intersection of Religion, Medicine, and Human Rights - John Geisheker [https://youtu.be/jm3bo485Qlg] http://www.sexasnatureintendedit.com/10F/Foreskin_Functions.html NSFW
/r/MensRights06/10/16 03:52 PM
1

Invasion of the body snatchers.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 05:30 AM
18

If it's done without consent and for non-therapeutic reasons, it's definitely mutilation. Cool, you like being cut, don't carve sexual preferences into children though ;)
/r/MensRights06/10/16 05:27 AM
19

This is what always bothers me. Foreskin IS THE PENIS. It's just the specific, highly specialized part of it.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 05:26 AM
2

Need a lot longer than. It takes men years to restore.
/r/MGTOW05/10/16 04:28 PM
1

Even extreme cases can be treated without surgery. https://phimosisjourney.wordpress.com/ NSFW
/r/MGTOW05/10/16 04:27 PM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Harvey_Kellogg#Masturbation_prevention
/r/MGTOW05/10/16 04:26 PM
1

Child Circumcision: An Elephant in the Hospital - YouTube [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ceht-3xu84I] Circumcision: At the intersection of Religion, Medicine, and Human Rights - John Geisheker [https://youtu.be/jm3bo485Qlg] Male circumcision causes terrible damage to the male penis, and psychological problems that can last a lifetime. It's no surprise circumcision for purely "medical" reasons in confined to the USA and a few other countries. In western Europe there is now a growing movement to…
/r/MensRights05/10/16 02:21 PM
4

In those indoctrinated cultures.
/r/MGTOW04/10/16 06:38 PM
20

BUT DAT SRSLY HURTS DA WIMMENZ AND DA MENZ ARE OKAY IT"S JUSS A LIL PIECE OF SKIN THEY CAN STILL ORGASM IT WORKS FINE /s I fucking hate cutters.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 06:32 PM
2

I hate this shit so much. It's an obvious violation.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 06:31 PM
3

Umbilical cords fall off on their own. Once out of the mother, they no longer serve a purpose. Foreskin does not fall in this category.
/r/MensRights02/10/16 02:36 PM
1

If you're born into it, all you've ever know, you can get people to believe anything if you program them early enough.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 07:07 PM
1

Which are easily debunked due to the foreskin being a natural, functional part of anatomy. EDIT: Also, if someone was born as a slave master, and was taught that slaves were lesser people, would it still not be oppression because they wholeheartedly thought that it was right?
/r/MensRights01/10/16 06:53 PM
1

I have no idea how that happened since I copied and pasted o_0....| Edit: that was it's original wording, and you fixed it, hah. Playing a game of post tag miscommunication. :)
/r/MensRights01/10/16 01:38 PM
2

Severe trauma and pain at birth rewires the brain.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 01:31 PM
1

Pro-tip: You don't retract a childs foreskin, ever. Forcible retraction causes issues. They will know when to do it.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 01:25 PM
1

I would not have moved in the slightest. So you say with your fully intact and functional body.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 01:23 PM
1

Propaganda. Vested interests. $$$$$$$$$$
/r/MensRights01/10/16 12:22 AM
4

https://imgur.com/lAQrPV7
/r/MensRights01/10/16 12:20 AM
3

As long as a person chooses it, and it isn't forced on them in infancy, word.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 12:17 AM
1

Maybe not consciously. Some do think they're doing good.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 11:43 PM
6

Routine infant circumcision is so rarely needed, you can say that it's not necessary.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 10:43 PM
3

You'd be surprised at how many women in conversation display the intent to oppress. Whether outright, "I suffered through birth, they should suffer through this." or subtly by "I don't my baby have no anteater nasty penis." Cutter culture is very, very sickening.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 09:38 PM
1

$username
/r/MensRights30/09/16 09:34 PM
2

Right on. Recheck my post. I posted the wrong one. Milah is the dick cutting, shalom is the nice non dick cutting.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 09:31 PM
4

Well, done for non-therapeutic reasons it is, by definition, mutilation.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 09:25 PM
5

Brit shalom (Hebrew: ברית שלום‎‎ ("covenant of peace"), also called alternative brit (or bris in Yiddish and Ashkenazi Hebrew), brit ben, brit chayim or brit tikkun, is a naming ceremony for newborn Jewish boys that does not involve circumcision. Brit shalom (naming ceremony) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brit_shalom_(naming_ceremony) Even Jews are tired of this shit. /edit original post was about brit milah, the dick cutting ceremony. posted the wrong version/
/r/MensRights30/09/16 09:16 PM
7

Fuck those religions. Exceptions aren't made for FGM.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 08:58 PM
4

Carving an aesthetic preference into a childs genitals... is quite frankly... fucking sick. You've got to be pretty fucking stupid to cut off body parts instead of cleaning them. Infections are treated with medication, not amputation. There are different forms of FGM. Removal of sensory receptors, reduces sensory input, basic logic. Male genital mutilation is the same as female genital mutilation when it is forced on an unwilling recipient.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 08:58 PM
1

Might it be subconsciously? The active intent is not there, but the subconscious action of carrying it out may be, in certain situations.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 08:55 PM
2

There's foreskin restoration. You won't be able to get the nerves back, but you may be able to restore some function :)
/r/MensRights30/09/16 08:19 PM
0

I love flipping the script and seeing peoples brains ooze out their ears.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 08:18 PM
4

Cutting a child because they might be made fun of is the stupidest, laziest fucking excuse you can come up with. https://imgur.com/lAQrPV7 Infants remember trauma. http://www.sexasnatureintendedit.com/10F/Foreskin_Functions.html NSFW Functions of the foreskin. Sorry you violated your child. Don't make the mistake on the next one.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 08:16 PM
5

The foreskin is a part of the penis. It has function. http://www.sexasnatureintendedit.com/10F/Foreskin_Functions.html NSFW
/r/MensRights26/09/16 09:10 AM
10

Bogus studies.
/r/MensRights26/09/16 09:09 AM
2

MUH AUTHORITY!
/r/MensRights23/09/16 04:12 PM
2

Indeed. There's no reasoning for routine infant circumcision. None.
/r/MensRights23/09/16 12:52 PM
2

Look it up, it's not a secret. Kellogg introduced it. Bland cereal is the reason why babies are mutilated in America. Can't make this shit up.
/r/MensRights23/09/16 12:05 PM
2

Do you support using carbolic and on females clitoris? The same guy that started chopping dicks in America claimed it was legit.
/r/MensRights22/09/16 11:32 PM
2

There is no evidence that genital cutting is good. Do you know that Americans dicks are cut because of corn flakes?
/r/MensRights22/09/16 10:46 PM
1

White male got singled out.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 10:10 PM
1

Religions or individuals who harm children. Makes no difference to me if idiots are singular, or in a flock.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 10:02 PM
1

Right on. Appreciate the response.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 10:02 PM
2

Which is all bullshit. Would you cut off a babies breast buds to reduce cancer? No. Fuck off.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 09:59 PM
2

The invisible sky fairy that says you have to cut children to be apart of his cult.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 09:57 PM
2

Dogmatic idiots who want children to have the right to their whole body? No. Dogma is believing slicing up a childs genitals to appease some invisible friend satiates their bloodthirst.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 09:56 PM
1

Did you seriously just try to lie to a mod? lol /u/AloysiusC, can you confirm this? I'd LOVE to see the log.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 09:47 PM
4

All male genital mutilation is, is ridiculous logic and false information. Some "feminists" even support it. Join the club :) Also GREAT job supporting your fellow man voicing their pain and anguish. You don't give a fuck about men or mens rights.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 09:20 PM
1

http://image.spreadshirtmedia.com/image-server/v1/compositions/103516534/views/1,width=280,height=280,appearanceId=1,version=1440417743.png/mens-ur-getting-report-t-shirt_design.png Thanks for allowing discussion captain.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 08:51 PM
3

Education and empathy will eliminate the barbaric practice of mutilating childrens genitals. There is no right way to hack up a child.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 07:53 PM
2

Such as this person, who eventually committed suicide. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Reimer
/r/MensRights20/09/16 07:48 PM
1

Chronology of genital cutting: http://www.historyofcircumcision.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=54 https://imgur.com/a/CM4id
/r/MensRights20/09/16 07:02 PM
2

Well, they're not relatively harmless, and severely harmful. So you support neither. Good to know.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 06:35 PM
3

So, you support female genital mutilation too?
/r/MensRights20/09/16 06:32 PM
2

Indeed. So much ignorance and idiocy.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 05:22 PM
1

Indeed. And it's even more astonishing that MRAs will defend taking away a mans right to his own body. Insanity.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 05:18 PM
2

Single issue for a single thread. That's what this thread is about, dipshit. If a man cannot be secure in his own body. If at birth he is modified, told that his body is not his, that he is not good enough, why should any of his other rights be recognized? You cannot be for routine infant genital cutting, male genital mutilation, of a child and be for mens rights. It would be like a feminist advocating female genital mutilation. It's idiocy.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 05:02 PM
3

I can see your CULTural programming leaking out. You do NOT value genital integrity. You do NOT support mens rights. IF A MAN DOES NOT OWN HIS OWN BODY, HE HAS NO RIGHTS.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 04:47 PM
3

The only divisive thing is you claiming to support mens rights, but simultaneously advocating for denial of a mans right to his whole body. Make up your mind. Do men have a right to their body, or do they not?
/r/MensRights20/09/16 04:35 PM
2

If you don't value genital integrity, you don't value mensrights. Cutting a child is cutting a future man. You wouldn't go around supporting people non-consensually harvesting flesh from others, would you?
/r/MensRights20/09/16 04:25 PM
4

They are. https://imgur.com/lAQrPV7
/r/MensRights20/09/16 01:38 PM
2

An opinion against genital integrity doesn't belong in a mensrights sub.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 12:37 PM
4

Wikipedia also doesn't call male genital mutilation by it's true name, it instead refers to it as circumcision. While female circumcision, is rightfully called female genital mutilation. What's your point? I'll edit wikipedia and add zoophilia to it, and get you to support it, right?
/r/MensRights20/09/16 12:36 PM
4

Cite where I said, or implied that. If you're for mensrights, you can't be for routine infant circumcision.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 04:56 AM
5

Tearing into someones body isn't invasive? Please, do explain how cutting into someones body and removing flesh is not invasive. Take an anatomy lesson, never procreate, or be in charge of caring for children.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 03:48 AM
8

Clamping, ripping, and slicing an infants genitals isn't invasive? Fuck off.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 03:45 AM
5

Which is not routinely removed from infants. Thanks for proving my point, fucktard.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 03:40 AM
2

Routinely done, that are not part of natural human anatomy. Foreskin has a purpose. It is there for a reason.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 03:38 AM
4

What other body part is removed from an infant at birth before there is any indication of immediate medical necesity? Hint: None.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 03:28 AM
7

Slicing a penis and putting it in a urine soaked defecation filled diaper is healthy? Hmm....
/r/MensRights20/09/16 03:25 AM
7

It's insane to see anyone for mensrights who automatically deny a mans right to his entire body.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 03:24 AM
7

Do you support female genital mutilation? The benefits are obvious.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 03:23 AM
7

1: Women prefer intact penises. And elsewhere you can find men do as well! Source: http://www.healthcentral.com/drdean/408/60750.html http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/ohara/ 2: Masturbation feels better. Source: http://www.cirp.org/pages/anat/ 3: Circumcision significantly reduces sensitivity. Source: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06685.x/epdf http://www.livescience.com/1624-study-circumcision-removes-sensitive-parts.html 4: Despite the reduced sensitivity, there…
/r/MensRights20/09/16 03:20 AM
5

The minority is the child having his genitals mutilated. Every male is born with a foreskin. If they are not, it is a birth defect. It's there for a reason. Male genital mutilation is just as beneficial as female genital mutilation: Hint, it's not.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 03:15 AM
6

Dissenting opinion? About a males right to his full body? A males right to his whole body is a cornerstone of mensrights. If you don't own your body, if you're told from birth that your body is not yours, doesn't that seem like a HUGE violation?
/r/MensRights20/09/16 02:13 AM
7

So, there it is, this post (a sub section of the mensrights subreddit) is about genital integrity! * Holy shit. A single post, covering a single topic. UHEARD OF :O
/r/MensRights20/09/16 01:52 AM
10

Genital integrity means someone having the right to their whole, intact, genitals. Not being hacked and sliced at birth at the whim of someone else. If you don't think a man owning his body is important, I must reiterate, what the FUCK are you doing in a mensrights sub?
/r/MensRights20/09/16 01:40 AM
4

Do you know how genres and sub genres work? Genital integrity falls under mensrights. It's not anti-circumcision. It's for genital integrity.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 01:35 AM
5

What the fuck are you doing in a mensrights sub if you aren't for mensrights? GTFO.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 01:22 AM
1

It's a movie coming out that is going to cover a lot of issues. It may be in the movie, not sure. Authors website: http://www.brendonmarotta.com/
/r/MensRights20/09/16 01:14 AM
3

How about ones that give a mans right to his whole body?
/r/MensRights20/09/16 01:13 AM
2

Greatest civilization? That's laughable.
/r/MensRights19/09/16 11:14 PM
1

Thought that you could post some relevant links for this comment chain. I appreciate your work.
/r/MensRights08/09/16 02:57 AM
1

Paging /u/LukeArtaniss /u/Consilio_et_Animis
/r/MensRights08/09/16 01:34 AM
2

Harvesting it from children to put into cosmetic products. Google foreskin cream. Neonatal fibroblasts. I'm serious, this is a HUGE violation that isn't known. Nobody in Europe does it or condones it, as well as a huge portion of the world. Look up Harvey Kellogg. Look up the justification of it. Just as you could reduce breast cancer by removing breast buds from babies, you don't do it on the POSSIBILITY to reduce issues. Once you go down the rabbit hole of how insane and fucked up this practic…
/r/MensRights08/09/16 01:26 AM
3

If the majority of people condoned female genital cutting, you would be okay with it, correct?
/r/MensRights08/09/16 01:10 AM
3

Then you should know the ultimate rule, do no harm. If there is not an issue, leave it be. If you are interested in the biology side, just look at nature. All men are born with it. To not be is a birth defect. Amputation of healthy, functional tissue is NOT a medical treatment. DID YOU KNOW: There is a market for neonatal foreskin? It's all a scam.
/r/MensRights08/09/16 01:08 AM
4

Check these out: http://www.yourwholebaby.org http://www.sexasnatureintendedit.com/10F/Foreskin_Functions.html
/r/MensRights08/09/16 12:53 AM
3

Other than the ethcial issue of modifying a childs genitals when there is no immediate medical concern.... Yeah... That's a pretty huge thing. It causes trauma, possible issues such as death, early ED.
/r/MensRights08/09/16 12:50 AM
1

The individual. Genital cutting is abhorrent and should not be tolerated. You're not cutting a baby, you're cutting a future man.
/r/MensRights08/09/16 12:33 AM
5

What the fuck are you doing in MensRights and openly proclaiming to violate men's rights? Seriously, gtfo.
/r/MensRights08/09/16 12:16 AM
9

No consent. Cutting genitals of children. Same thing. https://aeon.co/essays/are-male-and-female-circumcision-morally-equivalent
/r/MensRights07/09/16 11:39 PM
1

I don't see how genital integrity for everyone is being biased.
/r/MensRights30/08/16 03:40 AM
1

People who have been lied to about health benefits, or are CULTurally conditioned do.
/r/MensRights30/08/16 12:02 AM
1

Camels are the choice of smokes for doctors! ;)
/r/MensRights29/08/16 11:58 PM
1

Biased bullshit. Here's some knowledge. Functions: http://www.sexasnatureintendedit.com/10F/Foreskin_Functions.html Damage caused: http://m.imgur.com/lAQrPV7 Here's a paint by numbers for the ethically deficient: http://www.yourwholebaby.org Skin lost: https://news.artnet.com/app/news-upload/2015/03/2015-mar-26-foreskin-image.png
/r/MensRights29/08/16 11:50 PM
1

There is no legitimate science for cutting a child. You can get rid of ingrown nails by removing fingers or toes, does that make it okay? You can remove breasts to erase possibility of breast cancer, does that make it alright?
/r/MensRights29/08/16 10:43 PM
1

No. I support people to keep their whole body and not be mutilated.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 10:16 PM
2

What style of circumcision for a baby girl is your favorite?
/r/MensRights29/08/16 04:25 PM
2

No. Female genital cutting was "legal" and promoted in the US before 1997. Logically you would support it based on your "legal" stance.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 04:30 AM
2

Consider the source. Who benefits. Do you know there's a market for infant foreskin? Do you know that it is used in cosmetics?
/r/MensRights29/08/16 04:27 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter