TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

This-Icarus Archive

View 0 posts and 311 comments by This-Icarus on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
19

Cutting part of your child's dick off is not even close to choosing what school they go to. It IS a personal choice, so it should be illegal unless for medical reasons, with the exception of once you are no longer a minor you can get it done to yourself
/r/MensRights09/11/21 07:17 PM
9

There are zero benefits for health and hygiene, it would only be more hygienic if you never wash. Circumcision is just plain wrong at every avenue, unless for medical reasons
/r/MensRights09/11/21 07:15 PM
1

I agree it is a terrible thing.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 04:55 PM
2

Got any proof to your "true" claim, no because it is your opinion and its the same opinion that femanists give
/r/MensRights05/11/21 04:47 PM
1

That's your opinion, not mine. Just look at that black woman that was about to stab that other woman and she got shot by the cops. You are just arguing because you have this mindset that anything bad that happens to men is sexism. You are basically an mra version of a feminist
/r/MensRights05/11/21 04:41 PM
1

Because you are wrong and cannot accept it
/r/MensRights05/11/21 04:37 PM
1

Because you know I am right
/r/MensRights05/11/21 04:31 PM
2

I agree mostly. I think the pedo stuff is hard to judge considering messages yare missing that might provide context for the assumption. But yes op if overly sensitive and needs to realise that the right to choose na partner goes both ways. Also hieghtism is not really a thing, sure some like taller people but the majority of what is needed to get a partner is confidence and personality
/r/MensRights05/11/21 11:10 AM
5

Both are toxic as fuck Not wanting to date a small guy is not discrimination it is sexual preference, just like not wanting to date a fat girl is not discrimination its is a preference
/r/MensRights05/11/21 11:06 AM
-5

I never said the shooting was justified, I simple said that from the cops point of view the male is the aggressor. You are arguing about shit we agree on you muppet
/r/MensRights05/11/21 06:02 AM
-1

You can just go off the word of the child you have to go by what you see. And when the officer went inside it looked like the man was the aggressor
/r/MensRights05/11/21 05:54 AM
-2

Watch the video, all the cop saw was him going ton top of her, it is perfectly reasonable to assume he was the aggressor as they walked in, that doesn't mean he was justified shooting him. You are looking at this with far more information than the police have to go on
/r/MensRights04/11/21 09:38 PM
2

You sound just like a femanist
/r/MensRights04/11/21 09:37 PM
0

You are wasting your breath, the more time I spend here the more I see people exactly like feminazis, completely unwilling to look at a situation objectively, and when you do you get downvoted hard for not instantly siding with the man, in essence they see you as a gender traitor. It is sad as I thought this group was different from that
/r/MensRights04/11/21 09:35 PM
-4

Did you watch the video? It totally looks like he was the aggressor in the footage, it is understandable to make that mistake in this situation. You are looking at this as a black/white issue you cannot remove the nuance from situations like this
/r/MensRights04/11/21 09:32 PM
-11

While this is bad, if you actually watch the footage the first time they see the father it looks like he is pushing over the woman and attacking her. While it is a tragedy that this man lost his life it was an understandable assumption based solely of the body cam footage
/r/MensRights04/11/21 09:24 PM
0

You have the right to disagree, I think fighting censorship with censorship just leads to worse measured being later on
/r/MensRights03/11/21 05:54 AM
-1

Depends, if they are just spouting racist shit they should be allowed the free speech, if they are directly calling for action that is different and obviously should get arrested. Free speech means free speech for those you disagree with
/r/MensRights03/11/21 05:53 AM
1

I know but you don't beat censorship with more censorship
/r/MensRights03/11/21 05:07 AM
-7

No one should be for deplatforming, censorship is never a good thing
/r/MensRights02/11/21 07:33 PM
0

You didn't even read what I said, it is based of statistics. Those who are higher risk pay more, in average men are higher risk on the roads and thus pay more. When it comes down to the individual it changes anyway, my insurance is far cheaper than a lot of girls I know who have driven longer, because I have never been in trouble /accident and my car is sensible. This is a nothing burger
/r/MensRights30/10/21 07:31 AM
1

It is based of statistical probability it is not sexist. People do take driving tests They do replay footage if there was a dashcam. The price for insurance is based on many factors such as: Age Sex Years driving Car you want to insure How much driving you do Where you live The list goes on. Not everything that is favourable to women is sexist, just like not everything that is favourable to men is sexist
/r/MensRights29/10/21 11:02 PM
1

Diversity just means no white men these days
/r/MensRights29/10/21 10:12 PM
3

Involved does not mean they are the reason for it, it is whoever is at fault that pays, if women were more at fault in the crashes they would have higher premiums.
/r/MensRights29/10/21 09:55 PM
-3

It's not discrimination, men are more likely to be in/cause accidents on the road, it is a risk vs cost issue not a sexist one
/r/MensRights29/10/21 09:05 PM
1

The left has been trying to normalise pedophilia for a long time
/r/MensRights28/10/21 07:46 AM
-1

You are making the baseless assumption and getting triggered over nothing, you make men's rights look like a joke
/r/MensRights24/10/21 03:14 PM
1

The people holding the signs are likely referring to their own. You need to chill with this kind of stuff it just ruins the point of the sub. It is clearly not a shaming protest but the opposite
/r/MensRights24/10/21 01:10 PM
-6

Yes, those people are walking with signs talking about their small dogs saying they are natural. Do you have any evidence, that proves your point that is not your opinion and someone else's comment
/r/MensRights24/10/21 11:39 AM
1

Have you seen what the organiser said? Stop basing you opinion on random comments
/r/MensRights24/10/21 11:36 AM
-1

You cannot judge the organiser's motive from people's comments
/r/MensRights24/10/21 10:27 AM
16

For the empire
/r/MensRights20/10/21 06:27 PM
76

Maybe but they were in ohio, our jurisdiction doesn't quite stretch that far XD
/r/MensRights20/10/21 02:03 PM
33

I would be so disappointed if I were his parents. Spending 80k on a university so that my child can hide away from opposing viewpoints and gets scared of men, I would have failed as a father Edit: spelling
/r/MensRights20/10/21 02:02 PM
7

I find it funny that she doesn't condemn the woman that killed her kids but somehow is a el to condemn the cunts attacking their wives/girlfriends, by her logic that could all be down to mental illness. Or maybe just maybe, both are wrong
/r/MensRights17/10/21 12:36 AM
1

Yer still a joke
/r/MensRights13/10/21 10:26 AM
1

Jokes a joke, you should be able to joke about anything from rainbows to cancer and everything else.
/r/MensRights12/10/21 04:36 PM
-9

First of all it's a joke chill out. You are taking a shit joke out of context to mean she support eliminating half the population, it obviously is not the case
/r/MensRights12/10/21 04:35 PM
11

They meet huge barriers if they want to work with children
/r/MensRights12/10/21 07:36 AM
6

Are you serious? This isn't about women being in tech this is about promoting equity over equality. Give everyone the same opportunity.
/r/MensRights12/10/21 07:35 AM
55

Sexual harassment is already a crime
/r/MensRights10/10/21 09:47 AM
1

Exactly it's just mean words, and sure the person doing the "hate speech" maybe a dick but that does mean it should be criminal, you start regulating speech eventually you get to a point like China where you cannot speak out against the government
/r/MensRights06/10/21 08:43 AM
3

There should be no hate crime laws
/r/MensRights05/10/21 06:00 PM
1

How uncomfortable balls are
/r/MensRights04/10/21 05:26 PM
15

Because reddit is overrun with far left communists
/r/MensRights01/10/21 10:17 AM
5

Equal opportunity not equal outcome.
/r/MensRights30/09/21 07:59 PM
1

You know kids go to school younger than 16 right? She would have been there the previous years. It is also more than just age of consent to deal with
/r/MensRights30/09/21 04:51 PM
5

Don't generalise, that is what the crazy feminists do to men. Women are not the enemy, we have to Co exist, we just need to be equal under law
/r/MensRights30/09/21 07:25 AM
1

There are different types of authority, teacher and pupilstit is a guardianship style, and as such is seen as taking advantage, especially when the teacher knew this girl when she was underage.
/r/MensRights30/09/21 06:23 AM
0

That is an opinion about the future, I am talking about right now. When did you get a crystal ball. If you say never you have already defeated yourself
/r/MensRights29/09/21 11:36 PM
0

I already have you have been ignoring mine the entire time. I have already said they should have equal time you dimwit I just said that 2 years is not enough. Like I said you don't understand
/r/MensRights29/09/21 11:06 PM
0

You seriously are either intentionally misunderstanding or genuinely are to dumb to understand
/r/MensRights29/09/21 11:00 PM
0

What about the longer sentence? And I think you have it the wrong way, men get harsher sentences, so instead of giving them less time give women more. People should still be punished
/r/MensRights29/09/21 10:57 PM
0

Stop. Moving the goalposts, and stop changing the argument. Do you agree with my original comment? This man should have more than 2 years and also women should get the same sentence for the same crime/severity?
/r/MensRights29/09/21 07:05 PM
-1

Where did I ignore it? I said a woman should get the same time as a man. A lot of people on this sub forget about equality and just shit on women, I have seen many people defending people purely because they are men, it doesn't make sense and it only hurt men's rights. I saw people cheering and defending Cosby ffs, who got out on a technicality not innocence. Take a look in the mirror and think about if you actually stand for mens rights or if you only want men to win. Men AND women should be eq…
/r/MensRights29/09/21 07:00 PM
2

Now you are just being pedantic, if you have any real comments to make go ahead if not stop trolling
/r/MensRights29/09/21 06:26 PM
-1

That is not the point I was making, the point I was making was that regardless of the gender jail gap he should have longer than 2 years
/r/MensRights29/09/21 06:25 PM
-1

That doesn't mean that you let the male get away with it, just give women equal sentences. This guy is fucked up and should definitely Be in jail, longer than 2 years
/r/MensRights29/09/21 02:20 PM
5

Except he is in a position of authority
/r/MensRights29/09/21 02:17 PM
2

The sentence is not harsh it should have been longer. Also females that do this should also receive long sentences
/r/MensRights29/09/21 02:17 PM
1

And the working class
/r/MensRights28/09/21 05:34 PM
2

Would have been better to remove the draft tbh, when women are in combat roles with males the entire squad performs worse. I think combat should be male only.
/r/MensRights28/09/21 05:24 PM
1

Because I don't think men should just go out and get the snip. I never used to want kids, I was adamant about it. Now, having been with my fiancée for 10 years am looking to settle down and looking forward to having them. I don't want other people to do anything they will regret.
/r/MensRights27/09/21 02:40 PM
1

Wtf would I ever got mgtow, my life is so much better with my fiancee in it. Just use Condoms it's really not that big of a deal, if that is not secure enough for you make sure you trust the person /know they are on contraception as well.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 03:45 PM
1

We are not talking about abortions, we are talking about getting the snip
/r/MensRights26/09/21 07:05 AM
1

No thanks
/r/MensRights26/09/21 12:09 AM
0

Or you could just go out and "score" as you say but use protection
/r/MensRights26/09/21 12:08 AM
1

Oh ok, like I said I don't know much of the law around that subject, just that my friend managed to get them flagged if they were trying to be taken out
/r/MensRights21/09/21 07:59 PM
2

Yes, and maybe that would be evidence enough for the law enforcement to remove the kids from her and give them to you. Unfortunately it does not seem like anyone is going to come out a winner
/r/MensRights20/09/21 08:58 PM
8

Hmm, have you gotten a second opinion. Not too savy on American law myself. Something similar happened to a friend of mine, here in the UK. He was able to put a block on their passports, but like you said no exit challenge and alternative passports would go around that. Maybe find evidence of the kids eqyptian passports and that could be used
/r/MensRights20/09/21 08:52 PM
22

Shit man, I don't really have any advice, all I can say is I sincerely hope this doesn't happen and you get to keep your kids. Could you get custody? Is it legal for you to just take the kids from her?
/r/MensRights20/09/21 08:47 PM
0

Go on run off because you have no real argument apart from wanting control over others body
/r/MensRights17/09/21 08:04 PM
0

I am not ignoring, I am telling you that you are wrong to impose your will on someone else. You don't understand men's rights or Femanism at all, you come off as someone who just want to control women rather than live equal with them.
/r/MensRights17/09/21 01:56 PM
1

Jesus I just read some of that, utter nutjob
/r/MensRights17/09/21 01:21 PM
1

Typical, anyway glad to see some people that still want actual equality :)
/r/MensRights17/09/21 01:15 PM
1

Exactly, he is clearly either misunderstanding my arguments or deliberately misrepresenting them. People like this give men's rights a bad name
/r/MensRights17/09/21 01:05 PM
0

I am not going against male rights at all, that is you being unable to comprehend what I have said. The incel comment was used because it triggers people and you are being annoying with your constant misunderstanding. My case is simple. Men have no right to decide if a woman get an abortion or not Men also SHOULD have the right to paper abortions (all ties, including financial) So again you don't understand what I have been saying. There are also not only two categories mra or feminist.
/r/MensRights17/09/21 01:03 PM
1

We are on the same side here, I am being downvoted simply because I am saying men don't have the right to a say in the ABORTION, I am not saying everything is fine how it is. Men absolutely need a way to relinquish all rights/monetary ties.
/r/MensRights17/09/21 12:58 PM
0

Again whataboutism You are making some assumptions that are unfounded here. I never said men should not also have the ability to have paper abortions, no financial ties whatsoever. So my comment still stands, I am not talking about the mens rights and child support, I am talking about it being wrong to impose your will on a woman.
/r/MensRights17/09/21 07:47 AM
0

Llahh yes, because supporting a women's rights is being a femanist, you do understand that the US vs them mentality us the feminist one, by ignoring women's rights for the sake of men's is the exact same as the femanists ignoring men's rights. Go be incel somewhere else, one day you will realise we are in this together
/r/MensRights17/09/21 07:33 AM
0

Complete ignorance. We will never get that right, and for good reason
/r/MensRights16/09/21 08:06 PM
0

Because it is not your body, so not your choice simple. You are making some huge mental leaps here and missing the key point. I never said it was controversial for them to have willing partners, but it is controversial to let men have the ability to force a women to have an abortion, or to force her to keep the baby. Yes they are not fool proof but if 2 people are on contraception then it is next to impossible for both to fail. End of the day it is her body and her choice. If you don't want kids…
/r/MensRights16/09/21 07:06 PM
1

And that is horrific and a massive overreach, I believe it should be legal but regulated, I think the heartbeat law seems pretty reasonable imo.
/r/MensRights16/09/21 05:00 PM
0

Men should never have the right to chose if a woman keeps a baby or not You clearly are either not understanding my comments or intentionally misrepresenting them because your interpretations are so far it's laughable. Also there is a big difference between a pinky and sperm, tbh it is quite simple. Just wear a condom and if you want to be doubly safe make sure you trust/know the woman is on birth control at the same time. You are making this a much bigger issue than it really is. End of the day…
/r/MensRights16/09/21 04:53 PM
3

It should be
/r/MensRights16/09/21 04:50 PM
-1

I am pointing out the ridiculousness of your statement. Sperm is not your body, once it is ejaculated. Women should have the right to abortion without the fathers consent. Men should have the right to paper abortions without the mothers consent. It is that simple
/r/MensRights16/09/21 02:14 PM
8

That is a great term that I am stealing. A paper abortion. Women should have the right to abort without the fathers consent. Men should have the right to abort on paper without the womans consent. I think that a lot more women would be more responsible with birth control and their own fertility if we had the right to paper abortions.
/r/MensRights16/09/21 02:08 PM
2

You really should have split the questions, because there is a big difference between taking responsibility and forcing an abortion. Men should have the right to relinquish all rights and have no financial ties. Women also have the right to abort without the fathers consent.
/r/MensRights16/09/21 02:06 PM
-3

So by your standards, any part of skin or hair that comes off of someone's body is just as precious. Condoms barley every fail, but yes shit happens but that still doesn't give you the right to force a woman to either abort or carry to term, it is not your choice and you have to deal with it. Also it is not body autonomy for sperm, don't be ridiculous.
/r/MensRights16/09/21 02:01 PM
2

Yer but I disagree with your OPINION. Most women should be in contraception if they don't want a child and should either test regularly or at least when they fuck without protection. I do not believe for a second the majority are using contraception, considering the main reason people have is financial. Why not go on birth control AND make the man use a condom The heartbeat rule is perfectly acceptable, of course there would be certain exceptions. Also I am not pro life, I am pro choice but regu…
/r/MensRights16/09/21 01:58 PM
0

Forcing someone to carry a child against their will is body slavery. Fact its not murder It's a bit weird to be trying to control people so much. Ironic you advocate for my abortion because you disagree with me, hypocrite. Have you tried not advocating totalitarianism
/r/MensRights16/09/21 11:15 AM
1

I don't see how it is not fair, if you don't want to get pregnant you should be on contraception and if anything goes wrong test/have a morning after pill
/r/MensRights16/09/21 11:09 AM
-8

Once it has left them it is not longer part of their body, Also a man can use a condom, and also I believe sperm jacking is illegal and if not it should be. Stop the whataboutism
/r/MensRights16/09/21 11:07 AM
0

No I am making a logical assumption because your argument is parroted by hardcore Christians. You cal call them what you like, just like I am calling you pro slavery because that is what you are. The vast majority of mentally disabled and severely physically disbanded people do not have good standards of living, you are using a few you "know" to apply to the majority and it doesn't hold up. You have no argument, you have a belief that does not represent reality
/r/MensRights16/09/21 07:49 AM
4

If you believe in Christianity then abstinence is not 100% lol When the egg is fertilised it is not life, it is just an egg and some cells. How about serious disabilities that will effect them for their entire lives, which you can know with a test when pregnant. Stop trying to force your religious beliefs on others
/r/MensRights16/09/21 07:38 AM
-6

You really don't understand body autonomy do you. You realise you don't have to agree with everything people post on here
/r/MensRights16/09/21 07:35 AM
19

Until there is a heartbeat it is not alive. It is not murder. I would agree that most abortions should not be needed int he first place people should be more responsible, however you don't get to force people to carry a child to term, I am not a fan of slavery. The only one doing mental gymnastics here is you, most pro-lifers are pro birth not prolife. If a child is going to have a horrible quality of life, suffer and then die early it is much kinder to terminate pregnancy
/r/MensRights15/09/21 09:23 PM
14

I have seen abortions after 11weeks and can assure you, you are misrepresenting what happens. I think the heartbeat rule is a good one, once it has a detectable heartbeat you are not allowed unless in extenuating circumstances
/r/MensRights15/09/21 09:09 PM
19

They do not chop them up kicking and screaming. They should have a choice to abort, it should only be allowed up until I certain point however.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 09:04 PM
5

You cannot stop the future. Also there is a difference between having a conversation and forcing someone. By all means you have a right to air your side, but you don't get a say in the decision
/r/MensRights15/09/21 09:02 PM
0

I never said we should, you just made that assumption. We should have a way to opt out of financial aid with the release of all parental rights
/r/MensRights15/09/21 09:01 PM
3

It is, you would not like it if a woman had the right to force you were the roles reversed. The mantra "my body, my choice" holds up for everyone and until we can grow our babies in labs we should never have the right in the choice.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 08:20 PM
54

I agree with this 100%
/r/MensRights15/09/21 08:17 PM
-1

Except you would then be forcing someone to carry a child to term they don't want, and that is basically body slavery. It sucks that it is not a simple 50/50 but we don't get to decide what they do with their body.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 08:16 PM
3

That is not what I am saying, of course we should, but we do not get to control the decision if a woman aborts or not.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 08:15 PM
-20

We shouldn't have any rights in the decision
/r/MensRights15/09/21 07:30 PM
-79

Men should never have a say in a woman choice to abort
/r/MensRights15/09/21 07:28 PM
15

Wrong, if you want equal rights you are not a feminist you are egalitarian. Do not forget the women's rights movement was started to get ONLY middle class white women the vote, no poor and not blacks. Modern day feminism IS anti-male, anytime a speaker or event is scheduled to talk about problems effecting men they come out in droves to protest. Think about this, in the UK there were over 100 women's shelters for domestic abuse. Domestic abuse is pretty much even between men and women. There was…
/r/MensRights31/08/21 09:17 AM
1

Yes you are angry, it is clear to anyone that reads your comments. The point you have been arguing with me. About (child support) we are in agreement, and have been from the start, you just have not grasped that I was talking about having a part in the decision to keep a child or abort it, you know, what this entire post was about. Also yes I did insult you, after I had already had 3 or 4 from you, so completely warrented. If you are going to argue in a post at least try to stay on the topic.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 01:26 PM
1

You don't understand what being part of the decision entails do you. It means having a say, which you don't. You act as if you have some authority over what people get to do with themselves. I have already said I don't agree with forcing child support if you want to give up your parental rights, can you not read? You have no grasp of what we have been talking about and chose one point that we agree on to argue with me about, you have zero understanding of the point that was being made but yet co…
/r/MensRights15/08/21 01:23 PM
0

You clearly either did not read the post or failed to understand it. Op was asking for 50% of the vote to keep the child, it's not his choice. You really need to grow up and have a more mature stance when talking to people, you clearly are unable to see things from a rational perspective. You also are getting increasingly aggressive and insulting so I'm just gonna leave you to stew in your uneducated cesspit of self dispair, hopefully one day you can mature and learn how to speak to people and a…
/r/MensRights15/08/21 11:53 AM
1

Why so mad, learn to calm down. That is absolutely what you are talking about, you want part of the decision, that means that you would sometimes have to force an abortion or force a pregnancy to fill term, it really is not hard to understand. I am not talking about the child support I have already stated that people should be able to renounce all parental rights. Your reading comprehension is not very good is it. You clearly have no idea what you are talking, but continue to insult me and get m…
/r/MensRights15/08/21 11:49 AM
1

More personal attacks, how very telling of the person you are. There is a difference between resources and someone's body. I also didn't say I agree with forcing child support, I am talking purely about the tyrannical view of forcing a women to keep a child she doesn't want to carry. Simple as that, you cannot force anyone to carry or abort a child, that is their decision, if you don't like that then you really should look at yourself and how you view others
/r/MensRights15/08/21 10:17 AM
0

We are talking about the fact you want the ability to be able to force a women to carry a child to term or have an abortion, you DO NOT GET A VOTE in other people's body. What is your oxygen deprived brain not understand about that? It is obvious you don't like it, but that doesn't change the fact you have zero right to decide what a women does with her body. I don't think it is ok to force someone to pay child support, if they are willing to give up all parental rights they shouldn't have to pa…
/r/MensRights15/08/21 10:08 AM
2

Life is not fair, and you don't get to decide what other people do with their body
/r/MensRights15/08/21 09:39 AM
1

Unfortunately life is not fair, and I am not going to try and force a women to have an abortion or carry it to full term, I am. Not a dictator over her body
/r/MensRights15/08/21 09:36 AM
-1

First of all 99.9% protection is more than enough to trust You have to deal with the fact you are not the won carrying the baby, and you may not like it but you don't get a choice if she keeps it. I was using the child support logic about your own comment on abortion, how did you not see that. But no you don't get 50% of the choice and shouldn't. Do you think women should have a 50% stake in the choice to get a child circumcised? Of course not no one should. You cannot make everything equal you …
/r/MensRights15/08/21 09:34 AM
5

Don't be ridiculous, it is way more than just being uncomfortable, you shouldn't force an abortion and you shouldn't force a pregnancy
/r/MensRights14/08/21 09:37 PM
-5

Nothing is 100% safe but the chances of a condom breaking are so low. Never trust anyone take responsibility for yourself as others might not. You should be in favour of child support, by your logic you made 50% of the child so you should have to pay for it. You are acting as if contraceptive is unreliable, when in reality it is better odds than most other things in life
/r/MensRights14/08/21 09:29 PM
1

Exactly, mens right is supposed to be able equality and farthers rights not shitting on women for anything and everything, otherwise we are no better than femanists
/r/MensRights14/08/21 09:24 PM
-17

Blame nature, unfortunately that is how our biology works. So yes they get the choice, that is why you use protection and do everything you can to mitigate unwanted pregnancy
/r/MensRights14/08/21 07:28 PM
10

I didn't say it does, but you cannot force someone to carry a child to term, that would be body slavery
/r/MensRights14/08/21 07:27 PM
-15

Like it or not, it may be 50% yours but you don't have to carry it. If men carried the children you would not give them a 50% stake in the choice. It may be far from ideal but it is still the right way. The best solution is to try your best to not get anyone pregnant unless you are both ok with it
/r/MensRights14/08/21 06:21 PM
0

It's always fun to reply with an insult isn't it. I fully comprehend your comment I was replying to the general tone of it, no need to get all Incel about it
/r/MensRights11/08/21 11:24 AM
1

All seem pretty toxic tbh
/r/PussyPassDenied11/08/21 09:45 AM
3

He didn't even start talking to her before he started complaing about being rejected, his attitude is the problem, that and not being confident in who he is. No one is obligated to listen to someone complain and then still be interested in the.
/r/MensRights11/08/21 09:24 AM
4

The guy is the problem here, his attitude IS the problem. Be confident, that is what women find most attractive
/r/MensRights11/08/21 09:20 AM
1

Also we may not need to get them but we also have zero power to stop someone having one if we really want the child, or vise versa. Anyone that celebrates abortion is a horrible person who is either a psycho of seriously mentally ill
/r/MensRights12/07/21 08:33 PM
1

I never said it was equivalent, but why should you tell someone how to feel about rape? Why even come into this subreddit if all you are going to do it troll
/r/MensRights12/07/21 08:31 PM
1

In what perceivable world should anyone be happy about it. Likes like saying a rapist is justified feeling happy about what they did. So again, how could it ever be something to be happy about?
/r/MensRights12/07/21 08:27 PM
1

Because it is not something that should be celebrated wtf, it is necessary yes, but it is a hard choice for most and you should not be happy about it. Wtf is wrong with you
/r/MensRights12/07/21 08:07 PM
1

Just like some women can be absolutely disgusting, like those tiktok women posting videos at abortions clinics like it is something to be proud and happy about
/r/MensRights12/07/21 07:45 PM
2

But you cannot force her to be a slave to the pregnancy, you also cannot help getting pregnant SOMETIMES. Safe legal and rare, we should educate people to make better life decisions
/r/MensRights06/07/21 09:40 PM
0

Exactly, you cannot force her to be a slave to the unborn child. Unfortunately it is a lose lose for all partys involved
/r/MensRights06/07/21 09:38 PM
1

I will agree he was falsely sent to prison but it was due to a technicality, not him being innocent. False claims are terrible but this is not one of them
/r/MensRights30/06/21 09:29 PM
8

It was not a false accusation though, it was a legal technicality. Cosby is a terrible person
/r/MensRights30/06/21 08:35 PM
0

You seem like a very angry person tbh. Say what you want I'm done with this conversation and deal with a thorn in the mra side
/r/MensRights29/06/21 06:35 PM
0

I don't care if anyone believes me, but it is clear you are not for equality
/r/MensRights29/06/21 06:22 PM
0

Exactly I was giving you advice, you chose to take it as an insult. But again think what you like, when people act like this it only makes the mens rights movement look like a joke and a bunch of whiney incels, instead of people wanting equal treatment. You also are insulting every women essentially calling them prostitutes that only give sex for something in return.
/r/MensRights29/06/21 06:17 PM
0

Take a look in the mirror before accusing others, especially when they have the authority on the subject. Step away from this sub, from the mra movement for some time so you can acclimatise back to reality
/r/MensRights29/06/21 06:01 PM
0

Think what you like it changes nothing. Also I know her and you have never even met her so I think I have a better understanding of how things would play out
/r/MensRights29/06/21 05:51 PM
0

Yes because we are a couple and would support each other. Also relationships are far more than just sex, we get meaning and fulfilment from each other Not and insult it is advice, people don't like to be around others that are so negative all the time. You literally said every time you have sex you have paid in some form, that is transactional.
/r/MensRights29/06/21 01:37 PM
0

Except my wife earns more, pays more and overall has contributed more. Stop being so bitter, it is this attitude that makes you unattractive. Not all women are bad and not all sex is a transaction
/r/MensRights29/06/21 11:06 AM
1

I agree it does get like that, we should be looking for equality and to live together, not treat it like a war of the sexes. :)
/r/MensRights28/06/21 06:28 PM
0

It is hard for some people to understand that just because there are a lot of gold digging women does not mean that it is impossible or even that hard to find a good woman
/r/MensRights28/06/21 06:23 PM
-1

That is completely false, I have never paid, my wife also earns more and pays more because of it, you seem to have gone way to far into mra, we should be looking for equality and men's rights not shitting on women. There are plenty of us that have truly equal relationships, women are not the devil and you should not assume they are all bad, plenty of good ones
/r/MensRights28/06/21 06:22 PM
0

You do you
/r/MensRights27/06/21 08:30 PM
0

That applies to you also, but believe or not I matters little
/r/MensRights27/06/21 07:13 PM
0

Well it was my comment so I hold the authority of that tbh, but think what you like, you were being needlessly pedantic and wrong.
/r/MensRights27/06/21 05:32 PM
0

I was giving you the reason it was included in the other person's comment as you seem to have not understood it
/r/MensRights27/06/21 05:15 PM
2

Please do not get equality and equity mixed up, women have all the same and a few more opportunities than men do. Femanist groups today still try to shut down help groups and talks focused on male issues. Femanism is evil, be an egalitarian
/r/MensRights27/06/21 10:13 AM
-1

To point out that people from all groups and either gender can play the victim card, it is not a feminist only trait
/r/MensRights27/06/21 10:10 AM
3

Yer my point was Purley from a legal perspective :)
/r/MensRights26/06/21 05:43 PM
10

You don't understand my point, my personal view of it is rape or not is not what I am talking about. I am saying that under the law is it considered rape to 'stealth' and remove a condom or lie about it. And so under the law lying about contraceptive or removing it etc should still be considered rape if the woman does it to get pregnant. Personally I would not consider either rape, still a terrible crime(sex crime). But I also feel trans people should legally have to declare their biological gen…
/r/MensRights26/06/21 05:17 PM
4

Write I complaint to the makers of the show, it is the only way to be heard
/r/MensRights26/06/21 02:21 PM
30

Then sperm jacking would fit into that same category in my. Opinion and should also be considered rape
/r/MensRights26/06/21 09:53 AM
57

Would you consider it rape to lie and remove a condom and then finish inside her unprotected, when she thought you were wearing one?
/r/MensRights26/06/21 08:13 AM
8

I was pleasently surprised that she had to sign the sex offenders reg
/r/MensRights23/06/21 08:10 PM
26

2 fucking years? Are you kidding me
/r/MensRights23/06/21 01:45 PM
1

I get that, but that does not make is domestic, from that example friends that attacks friends would be under domestic abuse. It is just plain old murder
/r/MensRights23/06/21 01:44 PM
4

Unfortunately feminism is wrong, and those that support it are either anti-men or misinformed. Femanism has never been about equality, not from it's inception. Promote egalitarianism
/r/MensRights22/06/21 09:20 PM
0

I did not read it, as I have not had much time apart from a minute or two here and there, was going Purely on the fact of domestic/non domestic, I am sure she is a twitch bitch, I was merely pointing out that I would not consider it domestic violence due to them no longer being domestically envolved
/r/MensRights21/06/21 04:05 PM
1

I do no disagree that it may be labelled the same were genders reversed, however I do not believe it still counts a domestic abuse if they are no longer together, that would be just regular assault/attempted murder imo.
/r/MensRights21/06/21 10:04 AM
5

While this is terrible, would it constitute domestic violence if the person is an ex and no longer living with him?
/r/MensRights20/06/21 11:17 PM
1

Most regret it, also that one example is one of many, even if we don't talk about crime men should not be in women's changing rooms. Also I acknowledge they exist but I don't have to lie and say they are women. Children are much more likely to be damaged by having the drugs and surgery than they are if they ait until they are older. I follow the science and scientifically they will never and can never change gender, it is a mental illness that should not be treated with surgery
/r/MensRights16/06/21 05:37 PM
1

Hormone blockers are not reversible, the initial effects are but not the long term effect and mental health issues are not known, they should not be given to minors at all, so no not reversible. Socially they are not men, they are women pretending to be men or vise versa, and for good measure l, here in the UK a rapist said he was trans and got out into a female prison, he then proceeded to rape inmates. You say it is just to trigger trans people but how about the constant forcing down peoples t…
/r/MensRights16/06/21 03:48 PM
1

They are not reversible at all. You biology is what defines the characteristics of you, I.e. If you are biologically a man you cannot change that biology to female.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 03:11 PM
1

They would agree with me scientifically I am correct. It is not retarded it is retarded to let people chemically castrate kids and give them drugs they done need
/r/MensRights13/06/21 03:10 PM
1

I'm just done with you tbh, going in circles, was zero point to even continue as you failed to grasp even the basic points.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 03:08 PM
1

Who cares about results later in life when protecting the children is far more important. Factually true actually. If you are biologically a man, you will always be a man, same with a woman, no amount of surgery or drugs can change that
/r/MensRights13/06/21 02:47 PM
1

Gender is not socially constructed, never has and never will be, it was only maybe 5 or so years ago that people started saying that rubbish, scientifically speaking gender and sex have always been synonymous. Most countries want to protect their kids yes, that is why the do not allow hrt or blockers /surgery on minors
/r/MensRights13/06/21 02:45 PM
1

Your case my differ but it is ridiculously easy for them to get approved. The area you live and work guidelines differ, in most places it is easy as piss. But now I know why you are whining so much, its because of your mental illness
/r/MensRights13/06/21 02:42 PM
1

No trans women are men with female brains, this is not the first time being trans has been a fad and luckily most will grow out of it. The few that do biologically have female brains can do what they like to themselves AFTER they turn into adults. Their body their choice.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 02:40 PM
1

It absolutely is happening and you need to read more into it instead of just listening to the crazies spouting rubbish and giving their kids puberty blockers. Gender and sex are synonymous, there is no social constructed gender bullshit, that is just far left nonsense Besides I'm done with you, luckily most countries are starting to wise up and stop this treatment for minors.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 02:38 PM
1

Wrong again, most change their mind as they grow up and most also regret having the surgery. Those parents are wrong and have been lied to, in a lot of circumstances you only need around 4 hours to get put on hrt and only a bit more for surgery, there is basically zero pushback.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 02:35 PM
1

They are not assigned, it is their gender, based on their biology. You have no idea what you are talking about. You are trying to twist what I say trying to imply I meant things which I clearly did not. Go back to your hole troll. I am just wasting my time talking to someone that advocates for the castration and mutilation of children
/r/MensRights13/06/21 02:30 PM
1

I did not say they were low in it, stop putting words in my mouth. Also yes they are, puberty blockers are irreversible and chemical castration. It is not fear mongering I am trying to stop people ruining these kids lives before they have a change to either grow out of it or change their mind. The same reason kids cannot give consent, we should not be mutilating these kids
/r/MensRights13/06/21 02:24 PM
1

Stop saying agab it literally means nothing when we are talking about people's biology, they were not assigned a gender that is their biological gender. Also I did not say it was because they were deficient in said hormone, but rather instead of giving them the one for the opposite gender give them the one for theirs, as test will make them feel more like men. You have this ability to take what I say out of context and twist it to something else you can complain about with reply to the actual me…
/r/MensRights13/06/21 02:22 PM
1

I didn't report anyone, I just told you to be civil
/r/MensRights13/06/21 09:32 AM
1

They give them estrogen, why not give them testosterone to help them feel more masculine, instead they go for mutilation, and for kids chemical castration
/r/MensRights13/06/21 09:31 AM
1

We give men that want to be women estrogen, why not give them testosterone to help them feel more masculine? Pretty simple. Why opt for the mutilation route
/r/MensRights13/06/21 09:29 AM
1

You don't even know what your talking about, why do you think they give them hormones?
/r/MensRights13/06/21 09:25 AM
1

Well we are done here, I am not going to waste my time with someone unable to be civil, get help Bro. Guess you don't think about how doing what I said might improve how they feel.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 02:26 AM
1

That's a medical decision, that has nothing to do with tread on people's feelings, maybe if you give them what they are lacking they might show better results. But instead we opt for giving them the opposite
/r/MensRights13/06/21 02:25 AM
1

Actually the fight club quote is pointing out that you can pretend or believe all you like but you cannot change the facts. The current treatment does not work, that is why the suicide rate and depression stays relatively the same, were are the trials to giving them the hormones they lack? Hormone blockers are absolutely NOT reversible, they chemically castrate, and being used on minors should be illegal(it is here in the UK which is good). All the feeling stuff is in relation to people's inabil…
/r/MensRights12/06/21 09:20 PM
1

Actually I am fully away of the neurological difference in a trans persons brain, I think we should look at other methods of treatment other than chemical castration and surgery. Also gender dysphoria is the proper term for the condition that trans people have. I also never compared gender dysphoria to body dysmophia, I just mixed up the terms dysphoria and dysmophia, sorry I am dyslexic though so not a big deal. I never said it was "just a feeling" so not quite sure where you got that from
/r/MensRights12/06/21 07:58 PM
1

Actually I never said they should not be part of men rights, I believe everyone who wants to help should be allowed l. I have no problem with trans people and even know a few, I don't have a problem with them I just recognise that they will never be biologically men, and think that the transition treatment is probably the wrong way to go, why not try giving them the hormones for their biological gender instead of the one they feel like. Also most people that transition are not happier and in a l…
/r/MensRights12/06/21 07:24 AM
0

Exactly. One thing that gives me hope, in the UK at least, is the banning of medical treatment for minors here. Too many people regret /grow out of it. To quote Fight Club "sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken"
/r/MensRights11/06/21 09:53 PM
-1

You are wrong, they are synonymous, it is only recently that people (not scientists) have been changing gender to mean something other than biological sex, it is not a proven fact as you state. I suggest you take another look at these dense papers you talk about, and their sources/data. Transgenderism is also a mental illness, literally (not an insult) it is a genetic mistake, scientifically speaking. Also please refrain from your condescending tone.
/r/MensRights11/06/21 09:51 PM
1

I am aware of what you are talking about, however hermaphrodites are a biological anomaly and a generally ignores when speaking broadly as they are the exception not the rule. I never said trans people do not exist, nor made any comment about their brain, I am aware of a "female" brain to use your terms, however it is still medically seen as a biological abnormality. Gender dysmophia, sex and gender are synonymous. What troubles me is the use of chemical castration and hrt on minors, if you are …
/r/MensRights11/06/21 09:47 PM
2

I love you <3
/r/MensRights11/06/21 08:38 PM
1

People understand what you mean sure, but they also know you mean biological and not a doctor handing out genders as if it were undecided. But anyway this is just going in circles. Continue to use the wrong term all you like, I would never force speech
/r/MensRights11/06/21 08:34 PM
1

I am not confused, just pointing out that it is incorrect
/r/MensRights11/06/21 08:30 PM
1

People use biological all the time, mostly shortening it to bio-females/bio-male. It is a lot more useful than the implication of assignment as opposed to biology
/r/MensRights11/06/21 08:29 PM
1

Not really, you should use the term biologically female then
/r/MensRights11/06/21 08:26 PM
2

That's fine use it all you want, you will just be talking gibberish
/r/MensRights11/06/21 08:23 PM
3

I am not invalidating anyone's experience, but if I told you was really a horse and believed it I would still be wrong. Also that is not what many think that is how it has always been, gender/sex are interchangeable words and have been for decades, it is only recently that people have come up with the crazy idea that it is a social construct. Like I said to the other person you can disagree and still be respectful, I should not be forced to spout something I disagree with just save someone's hur…
/r/MensRights11/06/21 08:21 PM
2

Gender*, that is the implication of assigned, it implies that it is not predetermined by your biology, when it was already decided before you were born
/r/MensRights11/06/21 08:13 PM
2

The doctor can get it wrong sure but the fact of the gender doesn't change. Not upset at all, tbh I find these little back and forths funny. But again they are not comparable
/r/MensRights11/06/21 08:11 PM
2

You are not speaking correctly at all, no one assigned the gender, it is deduced from the genitals or further more chromosomes or gamides. So no you are not correct it is prebuilt into your biological makeup and cannot be changed or assigned
/r/MensRights11/06/21 07:31 PM
1

But it is not, one is a mistake on wording the other has a meaning that is not comparable.
/r/MensRights11/06/21 07:24 PM
1

Exactly, I am a disagreeable person and people disagree with me all the time as well, the only thing that matters is being civil
/r/MensRights11/06/21 07:23 PM
2

No sorry you are wrong, sex and gender are synonymous and interchangeable.
/r/MensRights11/06/21 07:22 PM
1

No they are not but you knew what I meant and only ass hats correct people's grammar on the Internet
/r/MensRights11/06/21 07:21 PM
2

How am I being a sex nazi? Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken
/r/MensRights11/06/21 07:18 PM
1

Don't be a grammar nazi
/r/MensRights11/06/21 07:17 PM
3

Not assigned, that is they're sex
/r/MensRights11/06/21 07:15 PM
3

Unfortunately science overrules feelings, and people cannot change gender. I don't think it is hurtful at all, as long as you treat the person with respect you do not have to cater to their pronouns or what they want to be known as
/r/MensRights11/06/21 07:14 PM
21

As long as they want equality for men they are welcome
/r/MensRights11/06/21 07:11 PM
3

We are more likely to work harder and more hours in more unfavourable conditions, they only want equity in air conditioned offices
/r/MensRights11/06/21 07:05 PM
3

Clearly some crazy bitch that running out her biological clock and blames men
/r/MensRights31/05/21 08:20 PM
3

Justice for men an boys, in addition to the comment above
/r/MensRights22/05/21 11:11 AM
12

Because Wikipedia is moderated by the woke, so men and men's rights are bad
/r/MensRights22/05/21 11:07 AM
1

Sending pictures of his dick to kids for instance
/r/MensRights18/05/21 06:11 PM
1

You could be right but if they do they should be locked up
/r/MensRights18/05/21 06:10 PM
-3

This kid is fucked up and should probably be in jail, however this therapist is a typical leftwing/doesn't care about men's issue type.
/r/MensRights18/05/21 11:31 AM
7

This really is the only solution, you need some confidence
/r/MensRights12/05/21 11:22 AM
13

It is good to step back and recalibrate every so often
/r/MensRights09/05/21 08:56 PM
3

We can agree on that :)
/r/MensRights09/05/21 08:55 PM
3

That's good, and like I said I mean no disrespect to any single parent l, but I feel there is already an attack on the western nuclear family. I think the most important thing is having a good male rolemodel in a child life
/r/MensRights09/05/21 07:49 PM
1

Mothers day is the 27th of March
/r/MensRights09/05/21 07:21 PM
2

Single parents should not be celebrated, respected yes, but children need a mother and a father and the goal should be to bring them up together.
/r/MensRights09/05/21 07:19 PM
1

I get that and the same goes for you, I just don't agree that this will do anything but make it worse for men and everyone in general. I also disagree with pacifisim, however we must always hold ourselves to a higher standard than those we are fighting.
/r/MensRights09/05/21 07:09 PM
1

No they won't but that doesn't mean use the enemies tactics. Just because isis beheads people does not mean we should behead them. You only make the problem worse
/r/MensRights09/05/21 06:55 PM
7

Yup, but our country has become a pile of shit totalitarian state at this point
/r/MensRights09/05/21 04:10 PM
4

Fgm is worse but mgm is still horrendous
/r/MensRights09/05/21 04:09 PM
7

The real question is why are you watching that garbage
/r/MensRights09/05/21 04:08 PM
1

There is an option, don't start by telling people they are wrong that just makes them defensive you have to try and see things from their point and also give yours, canceling is such a bad idea and will only hurt men's rights more
/r/MensRights09/05/21 11:36 AM
1

I get what you are saying but it is a never ending cycle, it does not just stop when the people doing the canceling get cancelled, someone else just takes their place, it is much better to have no cancelling at all
/r/MensRights08/05/21 09:01 PM
2

But it's not foolish, like the people today censoring anything Conservative, some people on the left have started to get cancelled and they are shocked. It is all well and good censoring people you disagree with but what happens when the people decide you should be censored? The same applies to war just because the enemy does not abide by the Geneva convention does not mean that we can just ignore it.
/r/MensRights08/05/21 08:07 AM
11

Don't do that. Don't try to cancel them because they say something you don't like it is such a slippery slope. Freedom of speech is freedom to offend.
/r/MensRights07/05/21 04:30 PM
11

What I am saying is they don't HAVE to buy the expensive stuff, and I never had a problem with the cheap shit. Their are options out there so it is not more expensive for either gender
/r/MensRights07/05/21 04:03 PM
27

Apart from this guys valid points, Women do not have to pay more, they can easily buy the cheaper items and not buy makeup or the expensive razors/shampoo. I used to have long hair and I always just used the cheap 3in1 and it was never an issue. I will say that we don't have to buy sanitary products, but you can also get cheap or reusable forms of that as well, they choose the more expensive items. The people that complain about paying more have never had to choose between food or a bill
/r/MensRights07/05/21 01:02 PM
1

Yes exactly, but we also need to help encourage them to come forward, it is not just women that urge actual victims to come out and report it.
/r/MensRights28/04/21 06:51 PM
2

Maybe a campaign to encourage men to come forward, that's it is nothing to be ashamed of, show the statistics. The only reason so many women report it is that there have been protests and campaigns to bring awareness and encourage reporting.
/r/MensRights28/04/21 11:27 AM
8

I agree, however it would need to be anonymous, men rarely like to come forward unfortunately.
/r/MensRights27/04/21 11:15 PM
17

Easy. The last study I found had the domestic abuse rate at around 60%/40%, men being the 40%, look anywhere that has anything about abuse, it is always men being the abusers and women the victims. There was only one shelter for men that I can remember and that had to close down due to having its funding taken away by the government, (I think he killed himself, could be wrong on that), there are hundreds of womens shelters. Suicide is also seen as a problem that mostly effects women, they state …
/r/MensRights27/04/21 10:31 PM
8

It is not baseless it is based on previous implementation of laws similar to this. I hope it will be done equally, but I don't expect it to be the case
/r/MensRights27/04/21 10:16 PM
15

I agree but it will not be applied equally.
/r/MensRights27/04/21 08:16 PM
2

I agree, but it is necessary in very extreme and rare circumstances.l, and they are the only reason I think they should be allowed, pre 18. After you are 18 it's your body you can do what ya like
/r/MensRights27/04/21 07:18 PM
1

I understand the religious aspect of it, I am saying that in rare cases it is a medically necessary
/r/MensRights27/04/21 09:39 AM
1

I don't think you understand what we are talking about
/r/MensRights26/04/21 10:32 PM
1

So because you think there is never a medical need then it should be taken as fact? I am fully against circumcision but you have to recognise that their are always extenuating circumstances. Just like people who are very anti-abortion most will admit that it is acceptable if it will stop both mother and child from dying due to complications.
/r/MensRights26/04/21 09:50 PM
1

That brings the possibility of tearing later on which could be dangerous.
/r/MensRights26/04/21 08:18 PM
-1

Actually it is SOMETIMES necessary, such as when people have extremely tight foreskin that won't ease with anything else.
/r/MensRights26/04/21 04:52 PM
8

Exactly, and absolutely no exemption just because it is your religion. Safety of the kids is more important. Also the argument for it being cleaner is false
/r/MensRights26/04/21 03:59 AM
16

Only do it if it is medically necessary, otherwise its is male genitlemutilation
/r/MensRights26/04/21 02:03 AM
7

I think if that is what you want then go for it. I myself and engaged and about to start a family, I think the main thing is to choose what YOU want and pursue it. And also be careful when it come to kids and marriage
/r/MensRights23/04/21 10:36 AM
2

Actually if you take of a condom without telling them it is considered rape, so by proxy this should
/r/MensRights22/04/21 08:03 PM
1

True but I would rather wrap it up then ha e the snip. But I might change my mind in a couple years when I have had kids
/r/MensRights22/04/21 05:44 PM
8

I don't think legally but I would consider it rape, but every man should know not to trust that statement and wrap it up
/r/MensRights22/04/21 02:05 PM
3

Still do not see how it is sexist, do you mean because the clients are overwhelmingly men, so that still being a crime is sexist, if so you could also say that making it illegal is sexist because the overwhelming majority of prostitutes are female. Either way I think prostitution should be legal for the provider and client. However that doesn't mean that I think it is morally acceptable.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 05:33 AM
5

?
/r/MensRights21/04/21 07:20 PM
18

Correct me if I am wrong but I didn't see anything in that article that stated men would not fall under this new rule
/r/MensRights21/04/21 07:12 PM
1

Someone that has committed a sex crime more commonly used for pedos, but basically any sex crime
/r/MensRights20/04/21 06:27 PM
3

No, but it also depends on if they believe you or know why you are there, you could race other problems. Depending on what country/area you are, here in the UK you are likely to be killed etc if they think you are a nonce.
/r/MensRights19/04/21 09:35 PM
1

Yes I from the UK, and I think there is a grey area regarding copyright.
/r/MensRights17/04/21 08:41 PM
1

I would say worthless, but also we are talking about the uk not America
/r/MensRights17/04/21 02:34 AM
1

I still disagree due to the sole fact it was unsolicited, which I would consider it being sent into the public domain
/r/MensRights16/04/21 08:39 PM
2

We will have to agree to disagree
/r/MensRights16/04/21 08:36 PM
1

You are attributing this situation to one involving someone you are in a relationship with. Completely different scenarios. Both are to blame, she should not send nude photos to anyone without their consent, and he should not have given them to other people. Both are equally to blame. She is not a victim and neither is he. Again if I sent a dick pic to a stranger i liked that is completely unacceptable and could land me in trouble. You have to think of both side so you do not create a double sta…
/r/MensRights16/04/21 03:22 PM
1

It is completely fair to put half the blame on her, if I sent an unsolicited dick pic to a girl even with innocent intentions I would get in serious trouble. And you think that she would not have shared the photo were the roles reversed? It is not victim blaming at all, as she is not a victim, don't send nude photos to people who have not asked and have not agreed to keep them private. They are young of course they are both going to show others be they want to look cool. Sharing a nude photo wit…
/r/MensRights16/04/21 12:39 PM
1

I wouldn't say that proves anything, with enough money you can buy your way out if anything. It still stands that whether or not he was legally allowed to show/give other people the image(which is allowed, depending on where you live), the girl sent an unsolicited nude photo to a 15 year old which could land you on the sex offenders register, obviously that would be ridiculous, but still this is framed as if she has done nothing wrong. The legality of sharing nude photos is not fully clear, that…
/r/MensRights16/04/21 05:54 AM
5

Tbh I ignore all that bollocks and live life normally
/r/MensRights16/04/21 05:35 AM
4

You are wrong, sorry but that is not how it works. You think anyone has any rights over the photos they upload to social media, haha
/r/MensRights15/04/21 08:19 PM
6

It sounds dodgy but if he doesn't accept, you could make a fake account and write a message to him explaining the situation (without chatting shit about the mother) and say you have been trying to reach him for years, stay away from saying negative stuff about his mother as that could push him away. And if he reads that and still wants no contact then you just have to keep trying and as he grows up he will talk at some point. I am sorry this is happening to you, but I would suggest joining some …
/r/MensRights15/04/21 02:25 PM
5

Ahh ok, then I would suggest contact every single men's rights group you can, and have you looked to see if he is on social media? A lot of kids are these days
/r/MensRights15/04/21 02:21 PM
16

DO NOT sign you rights away, have you tried contacting some of the few men's rights organisations around? They may be able to help, you could meet him after school to talk to him without telling her, not sure where you live or the legality for your location
/r/MensRights15/04/21 02:13 PM
12

That's a double standard, if it's bad for a young girl to receive an unsolicited nude then it should hold true for a young male. From the information given the fact is he was sent a photo, unsolicited from someone who has a crush on him, he is being given a photo of her, so he technically has the right to give or show that to whoever he wants, however send nudes to underage minors is a crime
/r/MensRights15/04/21 02:07 PM
7

Why the fuck is he still on the boat after 4 years?
/r/MensRights15/04/21 12:29 PM
23

Once you send an image to someone you do not have control over it, yes they shouldn't have shared it but the girls would have done the exact same thing. They are kids exploring their sexuality. If the boys got expelled so should the girls, if anything the girl 16 sent a nude photo to an underage 15 boy, that is a pretty serious crime. Obviously no one should get in legal trouble, but this is ridiculous. If you don't want naked pics out there of you do not take them, simple. The kid should have k…
/r/MensRights15/04/21 12:25 PM
9

Omg I am retarded, sorry I am dyslexic and got it confused with contraception
/r/MensRights14/04/21 08:05 PM
2

No I legitimately have not seen anything bad about it, but I don't always get much time online
/r/MensRights14/04/21 07:04 PM
13

People saying a male pill is discrimination? How?
/r/MensRights14/04/21 02:28 PM
16

I got banned from there for reply haha
/r/MensRights13/04/21 08:14 PM
3

Yes it is, but until they make it a law to keep people's identity a secret until proven guilty, nothing can be done
/r/MensRights12/04/21 09:12 PM
8

Honestly the only way is to move city/ country or state depending where you live. And hope that it doesn't follow you, or go on the offensive and sue for defamation of character, but even then you will likely come off worse. Men really do not have anything but hope in this regard
/r/MensRights12/04/21 08:47 PM
3

I am pretty sure one is very close to coming to the market
/r/MensRights12/04/21 09:22 AM
5

Clearly a troll, don't you have better things to do
/r/MensRights11/04/21 07:40 PM
3

He is just a soy boy, look at him he doesn't know that hating other men won't get him respected or liked by women, 5 years tops before he come out as trans /polygendered unicorn
/r/MensRights11/04/21 07:23 PM
1

Go outside you spend to much time on reddit and other social media
/r/MensRights11/04/21 10:06 AM
1

I think you spend to much time on reddit and not enough in the real world
/r/MensRights11/04/21 10:06 AM
1

I completely agree. By saying that it needs to change is not at all advocating for privatisation (although this is already happens a lot). I agree the funding is the problem, we cannot fully fund the NHS due to many reasons, such as immigration, people living in benefits(lying, not legitimate) and political rubbish taking funding away, we cannot fund the health care but we can give politicians 150 A WEEK for shopping when they already get paid far more than most. Why do they deserve housing and …
/r/MensRights10/04/21 02:05 PM
2

I wouldn't say boris I would just say politicians in general, tbh the NHS is outdated and needs to change. Either way no politicians care about the common man
/r/MensRights10/04/21 09:13 AM
2

And I 100% agree, we are on the same side I just don't like the idea of being forced to do anything, I don't belive it is moral. I think everyone should be offered it
/r/MensRights09/04/21 02:45 PM
2

Yes so you can have the option, but forcing it on people is always the wrong way to go
/r/MensRights09/04/21 09:46 AM
2

I am not American l, I am from the UK
/r/MensRights09/04/21 08:22 AM
1

Yes but it should not be mandatory, some people wouldn't feel the need.
/r/MensRights09/04/21 08:19 AM
3

That sounds more reasonable :)
/r/MensRights08/04/21 11:54 PM
-8

That is what I meant, I personally would not want a mandatory dna test
/r/MensRights08/04/21 09:38 PM
4

I get what you are saying, but personally I do not like the idea of my dna being sent off to a lab, I am a very private person when it comes to my personal information etc. I would never do one unless it was something I could do at home and dispose of myself, I know I sound like. A nut I just don't like the idea of anything like that being mandatory
/r/MensRights08/04/21 09:29 PM
-21

I disagree with mandator, my body my choice and all that, however I do think they should be offered to male parent
/r/MensRights08/04/21 09:00 PM
10

I fully support your right to believe what you like, I firmly believe that circumcision should only be done for medical purposes before the age of 18, then that individual can chose to do what they want to their body. I think any other means than medical are either common misconceptions (cleaner) or cultural, non of which are a good enough reason to cut part of a child's gentiles unless strictly necessary.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 12:10 AM
1

You have proved zero facts just complaining about the smallest thing and not talking about real issues like suicide, paternity rights, allomony, mental health, domestic abuse, the draft. When you make this artle into an issue when it really is not all you do it give the feminazis ammunition to say " see they just want men on top of everything" your post does not help men's rights it hinders it
/r/MensRights06/04/21 08:45 AM
1

Wtf is a femtroll? The only troll here is you, making mountains out of mole hills
/r/MensRights06/04/21 08:37 AM
12

It is an earning gap, now a wage gap, basically they don't account for different positions at different pay, they also do not take into account that women tend to take jobs with less hours and take more time off. If anyone is payed less for the same job( with the same experience etc) that is illegal and has been for decades
/r/MensRights05/04/21 08:44 AM
1

Your comments did not match your source, you said it was only mentions at the end which was a lie, you are just a very angry person. You provided zero proof you only linked an article and complained it mentions people being raped to death, grow up
/r/MensRights04/04/21 08:51 AM
1

I never made a false claim, you are the only one doing that here, your so angry, you need to calm down
/r/MensRights04/04/21 08:49 AM
2

I clearly addressed the points, you just ignore what I said because you didn't like it. You just hurt our efforts with this low grade rubbish
/r/MensRights03/04/21 07:02 PM
1

I responded to the points, you just didn't like what I said, no point continuing this conversation it is just going in circles
/r/MensRights03/04/21 07:01 PM
3

Wow you are very deep down the rabbit hole, the article is perfectly fine. Does it mention women more? Sure, is it justified? Yes. Yes 90% of the victims are men and it mentions it early, the problem is wonce you have mentioned the death and killings etc there is not much more to say about the men, they then go on to also highlight the brutal raping to death of the female victims, they did not make it more important highlighting other warcrimes. Why are you so angry? There are far more glaring i…
/r/MensRights03/04/21 08:45 AM
2

The article you listed in the original post focuses on both, are you seriously mad that it highlights the fact people are being raped to death? To be honest you don't sound like you car about men's rights and equality, it sounds like your just mad that men are not the 100% focus.
/r/MensRights03/04/21 08:37 AM
9

Mate you need to calm down, fighting for men's rights is not a competition to make our rights more important, this article was perfectly fine and non-biased. Remember that we should point out the inequality NOT start attacking women as a whole, that is 1. Playing into the sexist narrative and 2. Doing exactly what we are trying to stop happening to us, don't be a hypocrite.
/r/MensRights02/04/21 10:17 PM
12

Came here to say the say the same, I don't like the guardian generally but I feel like this article was not bais and was highlighting the truth. I did not see any special treatment given to either gender
/r/MensRights02/04/21 10:13 PM
9

What if you don't believe in a soul? Valid reasons are rape, incest, age of woman, serious health risks to the mother, serious disabilities,l. To be honest unless there is a heartbeat it should be legal within a limit as people shouldn't use it as a contraceptive
/r/MensRights31/03/21 01:59 PM
1

Where is the option for serious health risks, and mental disability plus rape/incest + under 18(only once)
/r/MensRights31/03/21 01:56 PM
39

Well I have been falsely accused, so I would say the chances are higher than you think.
/r/MensRights22/03/21 04:25 PM
4

Yup it's an unjust world. I have always been a fan of Manson and his music, he is a very intelligent and conscientious man I will continue to support him unless he is proven to be guilty, but I doubt it
/r/MensRights22/03/21 01:02 AM
1

Do you have kids? If not report to the police and sack her off, you don't deserve that. If you do report it to the police and lawyer up / document everything like that
/r/MensRights22/03/21 12:58 AM
6

Technically he doesn't need proof, innocent until proven guilty, however this is the real world so he is guilty by accusation alone
/r/MensRights22/03/21 12:56 AM
1

I did not know this wtf
/r/MensRights22/03/21 12:47 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter