TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ThisI5N0tAThr0waway Archive

View 0 posts and 26 comments by ThisI5N0tAThr0waway on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
14

They even have the civilian service as an alternative for those who refuses too participate in the military. So the Swiss refusal to conscript women is now even more illogical. And, as you said, not going anywhere.
/r/MensRights21/07/26 05:01 AM
26

Cis(-het) is absolutely used as an insult to denigrate men, but is also normal descriptive terms. Context will tell you how they're used but I don't think we should clasify that kind of word as slurs.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 10:43 PM
-6

Not what I said, learn to read.
/r/MensRights24/06/26 03:51 AM
-19

Important legal distinction, I stand by the spirit of what I said.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 08:43 PM
-44

I don't think that alimony is really unreasonable when there are children involved. I totally get that if one of the partner made some career sacrifice so that the couple could have kids, then absolutely understandable that they (more often the women) should be entitled to something. ... But that kind of reasonable default legal get abused by greedy entitled jerks who don't get the difference between own individual money and the couple's.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 06:37 PM
10

Some people on other sub have said that she is joking, but stupid and simple misandrist jokes should still be not accepted, exactly the same as mysogist jokes.
/r/MensRights11/12/25 04:45 PM
3

That's what I was looking for as an answer back when the meme was viral, but I was too lazy and not interested enough to do it myself. Thank you for that effort post
/r/MensRights28/09/25 02:43 PM
3

I've already said it in the same thread, but yes it absolutely does exist.
/r/MensRights15/09/25 12:40 PM
0

I have the exact same thought, it’s a overused term but it exist, and we shouldn’t ignore it
/r/MensRights13/09/25 07:40 PM
-3

Both toxic masculinity and toxic feminism exist. The difference is that the latter is not acknowledged as existing by almost any woman and mainstream media. They don't think that womanly things and stuff done for the benefit of women can do harm/be bad, which is obviously BS.
/r/MensRights13/09/25 05:36 PM
-28

I mean... Let's not kid ourselves, toxic masculinity exists.
/r/MensRights13/09/25 05:26 PM
7

I remember hearing RBG in some kind of talk about defending (before becoming a judge) a widower man right's to receive a state stipend meant for widow mother, where she was arguing that the state program ought to be gender neutral.
/r/MensRights02/06/25 08:34 PM
-1

Indeed
/r/MensRights02/06/25 04:39 PM
3

Is it stupid and superficial on the part of women who would only date men taller than 6-ft (or 1.8 m) ? Yes absolutely, and it's all too common. Are you also within your right to prefer to date only natural blonde, which would be about as superficial as that? Also yes.
/r/MensRights02/06/25 04:35 PM
3

I agree in principle, but just because you can't change something about yourself doesn't mean that dating prospects can't prefer that characteristic to be of a certain value. You know something else that you can't change about yourself? Your race. And you are perfectly entitled to be willing to date only someone of your race/ethnicity.
/r/MensRights02/06/25 04:22 PM
11

When you said get money out of those women I first thought that you said that women were paying, but what you probably meant was that women dating app users are an asset to be sold.
/r/MensRights02/06/25 03:07 PM
90

I'm pretty sure men are the cash cows of dating app
/r/MensRights02/06/25 03:01 PM
13

I have no opposition to women being into taller men, same thing with men being into athletic or thinner women; to each their own preference. But straight up height requirement, i.e. "you must be taller than 6 feet" are ridiculous.
/r/MensRights02/06/25 02:51 PM
1

Do not upvote, that podcast is rage bait. Yes the women appearing on it are dumber than average and make stupid comments but they are selected for that.
/r/MensRights04/04/25 01:57 PM
34

If animal cadaver, it is really bad taste and weird but I've seen worse. If human, completely wrong and unacceptable. I don't trust myself to know which case it is. Edit : see op's update, it's animals.
/r/MensRights06/03/25 03:12 PM
15

Double standard are widespread, very often discriminates toward men. If men were commonly saying stuff like "that's ugly girl thinking", they would rightfully be called out for blatant misogyny. The current situation with the "small dick energy" meme is rarely called out. Although I will say that men also play with that meme so it's not good but it's also not THAT bad.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 10:39 PM
-1

I disagree, I think that women are more sexualized generally in the medias but there is some pushback against women sexualization and close to no pushback against men's sexualization.
/r/MensRights21/12/24 10:04 PM
0

I've listened/read to reporting on the case but not the case itself, are they cameras and microphones in the courtroom in Ireland ? Let me repeat that the case is flawed, but she didn't invent the injuries and the injuries didn't come out of nowhere. It's possible that she was injured by someone else sometimes after, but for me what I've heard it's really unlikely.
/r/MensRights27/11/24 03:40 PM
-1

Nikita Hand's injuries alone prove that there more than probably was, at the very least, a physical assault worthy of some financial compensatory damages. You can consent to bad and rough sex with a star, which she appear to have done (in a somewhat drunken state but she still went willingly), but nobody can consent to what she apparently have gone through, unless people have a better explanation of when and where she was injured. All the accusations against Connor, while each may be flawed, as …
/r/MensRights27/11/24 01:54 PM
5

Yeah I just got banned from r/justiceserved because I posted a comment in r/joeRogan. Never mind that I did not agree with the post in question and I made a factual claim discrediting it. Suffice to say that this type of blanked ban for participating in other subs are f****** moronic.
/r/MensRights01/08/24 08:30 PM
18

I specifically remember the joy of many feminist, leftist but also "normal" subreddits when the sub r/IncelsWithoutHate was banned from the platform. From the reactions I read, people had assumed that the name was a cover to harbor the toxic people who wear the label incel. And let's face reality, trash humans like Elliot Rogers exist and I hope nobody will defend him. I didn't follow the sub that closely, and it's perfectly possible that at the end of the day the mods failed in their mission to…
/r/MensRights05/02/24 06:49 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter