TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Thorsvald Archive

View 4 posts and 139 comments by Thorsvald on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I will add something else to the distinction between the types of marriages. If we base it on the biblical model a covenant is between a figure with absolute authority and those who desire and require his protection. Covenants can be between God and the people, God and a person, or a king and his people. Contracts on the other hand are constraints that peers accept for mutual benefit. They are usually entered for the explicit purpose of the benefit of each party. So any party who is no longer se…
/r/MarriedRedPill25/04/19 05:18 PM
2

Married for five years, together 10 total. All of these are spot on.
/r/TheRedPill28/10/14 11:16 PM
2

Good post man. A fellow former BP guy here. I'm not an alpha, but have learned to better than I was, and have maintained a relationship/marriage for 10 years now. I'm inspired by this to try to summarize my own experience.
/r/TheRedPill17/10/14 06:11 PM
1

Thanks. You are a scholar and a gentleman
/r/MensRights04/10/14 04:02 PM
1

Alpha fucks in action. He's attractive, so she didn't do the right thing and report him to HR. That's only for ugly creeps. Instead she waited until she had drunk to much (which she knows is a little) to make a sexual move. That right there confirmed multiple RP observations. She admitted them but didn't realize what she was saying to those who had ears to hear.
/r/TheRedPill02/10/14 05:53 PM
2

Boom. Nailed it. There is only a paradox if you believe (against evidence and for ideological reasons only) that working more would make women happier.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/14 06:48 PM
3

Bravo sir. Well done
/r/MensRights23/09/14 10:42 AM
1

Related question: What do you call it when your wife hates your (hot) female friends, but insists you talk to them occasionally? She has previously gotten mad about us hanging out, because "she'd jump on you in a heartbeat if you were single". Does she think she can friend- zone me to my friend m
/r/TheRedPill22/09/14 02:58 PM
1

Another confirmation of the obvious
/r/TheRedPill14/09/14 11:22 PM
6

The fact that it's composed of young attractive women is doubly dangerous to modern feminism. These are the cultural trend setters among women. And men cater to them. If they lose women, and by proxy the white knights, they lose all political power. This is a potentially deadly thing.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 04:37 PM
4

Most modern BP guys make that mistake though. I did.
/r/TheRedPill18/07/14 03:40 PM
1

I agree, but pointing out that drug/gang/criminal activity related forces drive more murders than maleness does that. I don't think saying that economic and social forces drive the majority of murders/violence in a small subset of males does any harm to them or men in general.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 05:37 PM
6

Yeah, don't talk about RP in front of people, just do it.
/r/TheRedPill08/07/14 01:56 PM
2

Yeah, if you remove gang violence from gun violence, our gun homicides drop below most European countries.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 01:43 PM
44

Absolutely nothing concrete, or actionable. Brilliant.
/r/TheRedPill07/07/14 01:39 PM
1

Former Marine officer, can confirm all stories of differential treatment under the regs for male/female Marines.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/14 05:53 PM
4

Can confirm, have had several similar in the family. All women, none choose something that actually endangered themselves.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 09:00 PM
0

That makes no sense. You're more likely to be murdered or raped by someone you know. So being afraid of a bunch of strangers in a public place isn't based in any rational analysis.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 08:54 PM
4

The "family problems" are already there in cases of false paternity Yes, this. Revealing the truth will fix the problem. Of course, they view a father not being screwed and a woman being out money as a problem.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 07:52 PM
2

Women hate the idea that they aren't the ones doing the manipulating. The idea that their sexual strategy can be countered is horrifying on a gut level to them. Hence the accusations.
/r/TheRedPill03/07/14 02:09 PM
7

But the cock carousel leads to less marriageable, less kind Alpha widows that are a bear-trap waiting to happen. It's pretty common RP knowledge that riding the CC makes women worse prospects for LTRs. So it does "damage" them.
/r/TheRedPill03/07/14 02:05 PM
1

It's because there's no hard line between "attempted" with rat poison, and "attempted" with a bottle of Flintstones vitamins. A female family member also "attempted" suicide by making lateral cuts on her forearms (not wrists). Bled a bit, looked awful, but there was never any danger. And she chose to use a razor when there was plethora of larger knives next to her. So female attempts should be leavened with "cries for help" as well.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 04:52 PM
5

Slut shaming is mostly used by women as a social control tactic to keep undesirable women out of their social circles.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 01:03 PM
7

I will try to find the study, but males lack empathy to other males, and females have a massive in-group preference for other women. It's why the slogan "war on women" is effective regardless of the actual facts on the ground.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 09:39 PM
8

And I truly despise the response that men are being selfish by not breaking their backs for someone else's sake All of my yes. It's also funny how in pop culture it's either phrased as: "Men too scared to settle down" or "Independent women not getting married because they're empowered." But nowhere will you see anyone mention that men aren't doing it because it's a bad deal.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 07:10 PM
3

Shit, they just did a study about that somewhere.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 11:30 AM
8

Right. And a lot of that shaming comes from women. Look at the feminist responses to men pointing out male victimize. Full on shaming of every kind you can imagine.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 11:27 AM
3

And when an economic bill tried to focus on the majority male professions that lost jobs during the recession, feminists complained it was sexist and helped men too much.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 11:21 AM
21

Your last bullet nailed it. Men are burdened with all the costs and liability. Why on earth would they volunteer for it? It's economics people.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 11:18 AM
9

Only the courageous ones call women out.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 03:41 PM
2

We obviously disagree politically, but you're spot on about the permissiveness of male bashing in our society.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 03:39 PM
1

You need to draw the distinction between the whole right to work and vote feminists (which is probably what she thinks of) and point out the new leading thoughts of feminism. The lunacy and hate should help her see that feminism isn't a pure beacon of justice, but has plenty of hateful idiots as well.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 10:51 PM
0

Can confirm. The pioneer women that Daniel Boone boned might have been tough enough. Few modern western women are mentally strong enough. And near zero are physically strong enough.
/r/askTRP23/06/14 04:23 PM
1

Another vote from experience for this advice. it works.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/14 04:20 PM
1

Agreed mostly. Anal sex among heterosexuals is probably a good evidence point for that kind of theory.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 05:43 PM
19

Jesus Christ. i'm no fan of the POTUS, but this is (while maybe not efficacious) at least aimed at a real, demonstrable issue in our society. Black boys are most likely to drop out of school, get arrested, Black men in America are the most jailed, most likely to be murdered, least likely to achieve economic success, etc, etc. This is targeting a real need in today's culture. Why is this a problem? Why can't we try to help people? Fuck this makes me mad.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 05:05 PM
2

Oh I agree, I personally show many "beta" traits as well as "alpha" (side note: I hate using those terms outside of describing wolf packs) But I'd say it's important to know if they do play a role in people's subconscious decision making. If I know which aspects of my personality are less attractive, I can make sure not to highlight them when looking for a partner. Like how I wouldn't wear a WH40K t-shirt to a nice party at a friends house. I'll dress up and talk about history or some crap. Tl;d…
/r/MensRights22/06/14 04:56 PM
1

I'd counter with the studies showing extremely similar hip-to-waist ratio preference among heterosexual men across cultures around the world, waist to shoulder, genital size and height preferences among heterosexual women around the world, etc. I'd agree that a preference for accents is cultural, but also irrelevant for most everyone when choosing partners. The science isn't settled on what causes homosexuality, but if it's a non-beneficial genetic or environmental mutation/adaptation, I wouldn'…
/r/MensRights22/06/14 04:51 PM
1

I should specify: patterns of what is attractive are largely biological. Whether it's the hip-waist ratio or desire for a powerful mate, I believe those are overwhelmingly biological. But I understand your point.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 04:15 AM
2

There are others more focused on the actual "tactics" of just dating, flirting, etc, but being married I don't really delve too deep into that realm.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 10:52 PM
0

Right, they ARE red pill, but don't use it except as a general term. Some I read are: http://alphagameplan.blogspot.com/ http://marriedmansexlife.com/ http://therationalmale.com/ http://www.justfourguys.com/ http://zippycatholic.wordpress.com/
/r/MensRights21/06/14 10:51 PM
2

Yes. Also, r/theredpill DNE all red pill thought. It's a tiny sector of it.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 10:26 PM
1

I'm "RP" in that I agree that men and women have inherently different social behaviors and thought processes, and that I want to understand them to my own advantage. I'm an MRA in that I want all men to be legally equal to women. These are not in conflict.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 10:25 PM
1

If being MRA means pretending gender roles aren't based in our biology, most men are probably never going to buy in.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 10:21 PM
-1

I think you're biting on some feminist bait as well. There are gender roles that are tied to our biology and we act on them. RP types acknowledge them and seek to understand how to best interact based on that.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 10:20 PM
-1

RP that I know, not r/trp, is focused on the actual hows and whats of male/female interaction. Not the legal system, not the social system, just attraction and dynamics. They aren't invested in preserving feminine centric legal crap any more than we are.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 10:18 PM
7

I'd qualify that it's the "other women (my herd) value him, so he's extra valuable" as much as the fact that he can get sex (her bait) elsewhere.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/14 12:09 PM
8

Hard to disagree. And the idea that these policies somehow provide more safety is ludicrous, but goes unchallenged.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 09:44 PM
5

Based /pol/ trolling again. Of course, the real people that did tweet about it are rotten fucks, but it's pretty funny/sad that they picked it up so quickly.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 07:44 PM
2

Agreed completely, and doing this across the Federal government could have some bad consequences, but he's certainly legally right.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 01:11 PM
1

IANAL, but I believe you have to pay for any child you father.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 11:40 PM
41

Funny how women generally don't have a problem dictating what's ok for men to feel or believe.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 09:37 PM
29

In fact, interestingly, towards the bottom the writer says that if paternity tests at birth were instituted, it wold blow up families, and that's bad. As though a family founded on a deception is something good that ought to be protected.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 09:15 PM
2

Exactly. 1,000,000 years ago, a monkey-man that thought it's kids weren't tied to him genetically would have abandoned them or worse. Look at lions. That shit's in our blood, yet the man is shamed for it.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/14 07:52 PM
17

HAHAHA! As a actual believes in the Church doctrine type of Catholic, you hit the nail on the head. That's exactly it! The majority of Catholics like the rules like "love people" and "don't be a dick" but don't care for "give generously of your time and money to the poor" or don't believe in/haven't read any actual doctrine. Well put.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 03:27 PM
1

Yes it was, and there was a post in here a little bit ago about RAINN saying that "rape culture" doesn't exist in the US outside of prisons and is massively misused.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 10:20 PM
5

I love your faith in people. be careful out there.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 10:27 PM
4

And the fact that the police took her word at face value until he had a video. That's the real problem. She was "right" to expect WK violence by proxy, but he was smart enough to have evidence.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 10:26 PM
5

A good job summarizing the most frequent take on "Patriarchy". It's also funny that as different forms are discredited, they move on. The kind you describe above only came around after people publicly pointed out that no men sit around conspiring to keep women down. Then the radical types needed a new bogeyman, so they invented one harder to dispel than the first, because so much of it is inp
/r/MensRights06/06/14 08:05 PM
1

I agree. I also think that's why people are generally ok with not treating men promptly and well.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 08:02 PM
189

It's almost like people who have worked hard and done cool stuff understand life better than professional whiners.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 02:20 PM
2

Good for you dude. Fighting the good fight.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 09:34 PM
8

Annnnnnnnnnd there it is: "In 2009, a woman in the United States working in a full-time, year-round job earned 77 cents for every dollar earned by a man working in a full-time, year-round job." Don't need to read much else, it's obviously shit.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 09:37 PM
6

"Discrimination in hiring and promotion has played a role in maintaining a segregated work force." False, Google isn't not hiring black people because it hates them, it's because there aren't enough qualified to do the work.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 09:36 PM
5

IIRC, there are mechanisms in there to make suing your employer over perceived differences easier. I'm willing to bet a month's pay it's not just "equal pay for equal work". There has been language from the academic type that backs this that work beyond the basics of the job description shouldn't factor into wages. I wouldn't be surprised to see some of that kind of thought here. Edit: It has the following as it's lead paragraph, which is factually wrong: "Wage rate differentials exist between e…
/r/MensRights04/06/14 09:34 PM
1

How in the name of living fuck do you think you have a right to freedom from fear? That freedom can only come from you. Otherwise all you have to do is claim you're afraid to use institutional power against anyone you don't like. God, how can an educated American believe this?
/r/MensRights04/06/14 09:13 PM
1

File this under "no shit Sherlock"
/r/MensRights04/06/14 03:06 AM
3

This is all good argument for men not to attend private schools. They can make policies designed to screw men (as we see more of every day it seems) and kick you out. My son will be going to a public school.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 02:17 AM
4

I disagree. It's his legal right to face his accuser. Obviously it wasn't tried in court, but should have been.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 02:14 AM
4

Agree completely on the lack of role models and add in the vilification of masculinity. But boys going to the gym is hardly a symptom needing examination. We could all stand to be more fit: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0yQth3QEXtA
/r/MensRights02/06/14 03:23 PM
2

Personally, no. But it's good to be aware of because it's used as a stick by many feminists in arguments about how evil and pervasive the patriarchy is.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 11:45 PM
2

I'm gonna go even further. Because women are attracted to men's social status and power as well as their body, I'm going to claim anytime a man is presented in a way that objectifies him for that or highlights it, it's sexualizing. Checkmate rad fems.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 11:35 PM
1

Dude, you've found something you excel and are passionate about. That's amazing. There's other great advice in this thread, but I just wanted to tell you to go forth and kick ass.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 09:50 PM
1

My point above still stands. You're none the wiser. And rebuked nothing, just somehow conflated patriarchy with dominance.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 08:43 PM
3

Oh I agree, but that's the party line
/r/MensRights28/05/14 08:42 PM
2

I'm intelligent If you have to say it...
/r/MensRights28/05/14 08:15 PM
13

They're trying to say evil male values created the law. I argue that the social influence of women had a bigger hand than patriarchy.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 12:17 PM
9

believing that only the elected shape the laws How can you be in this much denial of reality?
/r/MensRights28/05/14 12:16 PM
15

That and a belief that women weren't just as responsible for it. Women's values would push for a law like this. Only the dense modern feminists claim that because only men could write laws years ago means only male values got into those laws. Idiots.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 12:16 PM
1

You've obviously read nothing that he wrote. It had everything to do with his psychotic belief he was the center of the universe. He wanted men dead because they got the attention and prestige that should have been his. Every dude believes he's deserving of love and companionship on some level.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 12:13 PM
1

No, we should care, my point was that being lonely and sexually isolated alone isn't enough to cause you to murder a bunch of people
/r/MensRights28/05/14 12:11 PM
2

Dude, in Elam's own quote he points out it's self-defense against abuse, and even then not something you should do because men will always be jailed if there's a fight between them and a woman. Fail
/r/MensRights28/05/14 12:10 PM
1

If you think I need to be a PhD to point out that he killed because he's crazy and that misogyny is the more likely cause, we cannot make any progress.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 10:49 PM
1

This person is intent on ignoring the actual cause and focusing on a manifestation of his lunacy.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 09:31 PM
1

False. This happened because he's a psychopath.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 09:28 PM
1

Sure, but of the people that commit mass murder, most are mentally ill. Edit, we don't you're in denial of reality.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 09:27 PM
1

Or, dudes that he saw as inferior to himself, like every psychopath. Feminism wouldn't have saved anyone any more than game would have.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 09:01 PM
17

Love how they claim advocating for men's rights is inherently violent and misogynist with no evidence. GJ
/r/MensRights27/05/14 08:24 PM
1

basically, they choose lesser paying jobs and work fewer hours, among other things.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 07:59 PM
2

http://www.aei-ideas.org/2014/04/once-you-impose-the-ceteris-paribus-condition-the-alleged-23-gender-pay-gap-starts-to-evaporate/ http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/02/01/no-women-don-t-make-less-money-than-men.html
/r/MensRights27/05/14 07:58 PM
2

You're being purposefully disingenuous. in the immediate aftermath, the rad fem types tried to make political hay by claiming he was killin all our wimminz. Hence the use of the actual victims demographics.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 07:54 PM
1

Spoiler, it was mostly dudes that died
/r/MensRights27/05/14 07:51 PM
1

He killed people because he was insane. If he were raised by the KKK, he'd have killed Jews and Blacks.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 07:51 PM
1

Because the shooting spree has shit to do with the cause in the hashtag, and people are ignoring the actual reason.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 07:50 PM
1

Male specific issues are far graver than all women's issues in the US put together. We die more, lose more socially, and risk more. Fuck off.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 07:48 PM
1

Wow, you absolutely failed to address a single one of his points and resorted to ad hominem attacks. How's being spanked feel?
/r/MensRights27/05/14 07:46 PM
1

Very well, I wanted to point out that insulting men is not tied to misogyny, but a desire for control. I could very well phrase the female derived insults as the loud voice of misandry.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 07:42 PM
2

The first is false, the second well explained by the facts that disprove the first.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 07:41 PM
1

Exactly. Tons of men across America feel as lonely and isolated. But that will never cause them to do what he did.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 07:37 PM
1

Again, false. Most shaming tactics against men are from a female perspective, shaming them for not being a thing that women want.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 07:36 PM
4

Holy shit, every trendy liberal site is taking the "It's the damn MRAs" slant. Edit: Quick rant. I'm losing my mind reading the mainstream media's take on this. It's utterly mind-blowing the outright lies about anyone they dislike, from RP to MRAs. And the blood libel going on in mainstream publications is nauseating.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 07:07 PM
10

Yeah, I'd wager she's never seen the actual FBI annual reports. IIRC, there are as many black Chicagoans killing each other every year as there are total mass murder victims in America in the last decade.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 05:19 PM
2

the causes of female rape is systematically engrained in the way society treats women. And that unproven assertion is where you lost the reality trail.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 05:09 PM
2

But you're wrong, men are victims more. By a shockingly huge amount. That's why your reception here is frosty, people here know the stats.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 05:08 PM
2

Very well put. Saved for future use.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 05:02 PM
16

No, she nailed it.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 04:29 PM
5

It also totes depends on where you live. I lived in a small beach town near a coastal military installation. Homogeneous population, a toddler could go walking after dark it was so safe. The only violent crimes ever came from the summer drunks. It's almost like it has nothing to do with being a woman, and more to do with who's around.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 04:24 PM
9

I find the contrast of NAWALT and NAMALT to be enlightening. RedPillers point out that NAWALT is a bad argument because most women are like (x), and thus it's useful to assume they will all act (x) way. Rad fems say NAMALT is bad because a minority are like (y), therefore it's valid to assume all men are going to (y). But red pill is misogynist. Fucking ridiculous.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 02:50 PM
1

No. Point taken. I'm sure someone is claiming it did, I meant his hatred for women and the way his psychosis drove it determined the actual people he killed. Somewhere a rad fem is claiming this proves Patriarchy hurts men too
/r/MensRights27/05/14 01:18 PM
0

Jesus some people are missing the point. People died because he was crazy. Exactly who died was because he was a mysoginist
/r/MensRights27/05/14 02:44 AM
5

I'm gonna go RP and say it's because a man that kisses their ass is unattracve. And that's unacceptable.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 12:26 PM
8

But everyone agrees that's sexist and calls bullshit. No one but MRAs will call out the women positive sexism
/r/MensRights20/05/14 02:12 AM
22

Even though it's click bait, a similar tagline on RoK would be seen as evidence that men are evil sexist pigs.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 04:58 PM
2

People who tell the truth? That's what they really hate
/r/MensRights19/05/14 03:48 PM
2

Perfect. Stealing for future use.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 11:50 AM
7

Another dad with 2 daughters here, support this 100%. Cuddle your kids. It's what they need. You can do it brah
/r/MensRights16/05/14 07:10 PM
0

Basically because we have very little reason to believe college is a rape fest, and more that it's just drunken sex everywhere. And I absolutely believe colleges are handling these cases wrong. But not the way that article means it.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 07:07 PM
18

There's a frightening trend in colleges (being pushed by the administration) towards sham hearings and rules of evidence that will trample the rights of the accused.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 10:03 PM
4

I also love the desperate running around the elephant in the room: that no woman would give Louis C.K. the time of day if he weren't funny and famous. And that applies to his admission of vulnerability. If a regular guy did that, women would drop him like toxic waste. The real point here is that only a guy like him could admit to those vulnerabilities. Also, way to tell us how easy our lives are. Get bent.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 10:02 PM
1

Right, solipsism the philosophy would be far more restrictive. I think the tendency to view problems only as they could possibly affect you fits both, but am open to counter arguments
/r/MensRights13/05/14 01:53 PM
3

Because it views the horrible suffering of others only through the lens of how it affects you and people like you. I thought that fit the bill.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 01:41 PM
1

Thank you
/r/MensRights13/05/14 12:20 PM
5

Can't you see how solipsistic that viewpoint is? Men get vaporized or maimed by IEDs, their mothers are the primary victims. Men are haunted and traumatized by death and horror, their wives who have to help them are the real victims. Utter nonsense.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 12:20 PM
13

Well, women sure seem to be constitutionally incapable of feeling true sympathy for men in a bad situation.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 04:13 PM
10

Yes
/r/MensRights07/05/14 01:05 AM
7

13 is BS and made me rage.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 04:14 PM
2

I'd agree, but their views are creeping in. Colleges are starting to run inquiries into sexual assault by the anti-man playbook. And the extremists are always the ones willing to fight for their views.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 06:05 PM
1

You are correct legally, but the problem is these laws also don't understand how little control the stronger person has over a violent scenario, or how a lucky shot from said midget can easily cripple you. And allowing the midget 1000 punches of 1N force will give him that. it's why cops overwhelm a perp with 10 guys, or the military trains us to use the most direct form of force available. Once shit starts, even being JJ Watt doesn't make you safe. Ending the situation thorough violence or runn…
/r/MensRights25/04/14 10:14 PM
1

Of course. If they couldn't take the husband's money, it'd be different. Ironically, most still aren't happier than when they were married. And couples that are unhappy and stick it out end up happier later on in life than those who divorce.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 03:50 PM
1

Agreed, but push-back on no-fault is more achievable, and may lead to a slightly less unfair ground for men.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 03:06 PM
2

A justified pay gap is not a pay gap. If I get paid more because I work more and longer hours increasing my value to my company, then getting paid more isn't a gap, it's a feature of my input. Edit: Your article even says women and men with the same credentials start out at the same pay, but then rapidly widen. And you don't think that's behavioral?
/r/MensRights07/04/14 10:31 PM
2

Well, that and women really hate to actually deal with weakness in men. Seriously, nothing will make a woman shut a man out and marginalize him faster than showing weakness.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 06:14 PM
6

There is no well documented pay gap. http://www.aei-ideas.org/2014/04/once-you-impose-the-ceteris-paribus-condition-the-alleged-23-gender-pay-gap-starts-to-evaporate/#mbl
/r/MensRights07/04/14 05:59 PM
2

Nailed it.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 05:58 PM
1

And point out that rape is defined to exclude men as victims.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 07:26 PM
3

Especially when rape is defined to exclude men as victims, especially of women.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 07:25 PM
1

Say it with me now, "There is no such thing as rape culture, there is no such thing as rape culture, there is no such thing as rape culture "
/r/MensRights23/09/13 06:20 PM
1

They completely re-wrote Art 120. It's confusing as all hell, but every possible permutation is now covered under sexual assault.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 06:49 PM
2

Jake's on you, they already are...
/r/MensRights05/08/13 06:47 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter