TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Thraes Archive

View 0 posts and 13 comments by Thraes on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I am validating u right now. Feel validated
/r/PussyPassDenied09/03/19 12:40 AM
3

Lol wow ur so edgy u sure got me good
/r/PussyPassDenied20/02/19 02:47 AM
2

Wut Thought ur first comment was satirical because relationships in real life are complicated and generally it's harder than it looks "just leave".. Which is why he didn't leave this one and why people of both genders don't always just leave abusive relationships... Now I'm just confused
/r/PussyPassDenied20/02/19 02:34 AM
2

Hey cool a comment that addresses the real issue instead of mindlessly negging all woman. Cheers
/r/PussyPassDenied20/02/19 02:18 AM
1

you aren't trolling here too? see I was reading through your posts thinking it was all total shitposts, giving you the benefit of the doubt that it was all an elaborate meme but it's just how you are. Your posts are so embarrassingly sad that I actually have a higher self esteem after reading them.
/r/MGTOW27/04/18 06:59 AM
1

You can't personify a person, so why would it make sense to objectify an object. It doesn't make any sense to ascribe the properties of of a noun to the same noun, and it's grammatically redundant. It's like saying you can cupify a cup or dogify a dog. It just bothers me that you're letting people redefine a word to go with their agenda and using the word in a way they want it used instead of the way it is defined Yes I do think the campaign against sex robots is absurd
/r/MGTOW14/11/17 01:22 AM
1

The phrase you use, "I guess you could call his use of an object as objectification," shows me quite clearly that you do not understand what the true definition of objectification is, and instead use the same nonsense new age feminists spout as your definition. I encourage you to stop thinking of this as objectification, because it is not. If anything he is personifying the object. You can't objectify an object, its redundant. Who is brainwashed again? I am using the proper definition of the wor…
/r/MGTOW13/11/17 05:40 PM
1

Objectification has been a word as long as object has been a word and it means to give something not an object properties equivalent to an object. That is the definition I am trying to explain here, and what you describe as objectification is very different than what I am describing in my posts. So different that I wonder if you even bothered reading what I wrote before going on a crazy rant about feminism and feminist brainwashing. The difference between objectification and attraction has nothi…
/r/MGTOW13/11/17 02:50 AM
2

There absolutely is nothing wrong with seeing somebody and being attracted to them, I agree with that completely, but there is something wrong with seeing somebody attractive only as a thing you want to fuck, I don't see what feminism has to do with it, it's simply wrong morally speaking to dehumanize a human, the definition of objectification is to degrade a human to an equal level as an object, it has nothing to do with attraction. Slavery is objectification. Art looks good, a hot girl looks g…
/r/MGTOW13/11/17 01:21 AM
2

That would still be objectification because you're saying their only value to you is the way they look, like some art or something. In fact that would be even more degrading, after learning about them as a human to decide that to you they are in fact no more valuable than art
/r/MGTOW12/11/17 08:44 PM
-1

Judging someone based on what information you have by just looking at them is not objectification, it's called prejudice and yes everybody does that. Looking at somebody, seeing their attractive, and immediately judging this attractiveness to be more important than any other information you could learn about them is objectification
/r/MGTOW12/11/17 08:02 PM
-1

All that tells me is YOU objectify all humans you haven't talked to lol. I know for a fact that all humans have features beyond their physical attributes. Not knowing what they are doesn't mean I need to degrade them into objects
/r/MGTOW12/11/17 07:52 PM
-2

I don't think you understand what objectification is... there is the type where you take something and make a physical representation of it, yes, that is one definition. Another completely separate definition is when you degrade someone to the status of an object. What you describe is the first definition, taking something not an object and literally making it into an object. The other definition is to degrade an actual, specific human into an object. It's not about thinking they are attractive,…
/r/MGTOW12/11/17 07:41 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter