TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Three_Sides Archive

View 0 posts and 53 comments by Three_Sides on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

The counterexample posted by kulgha (kudos!) is the perfect anecdotal antidote for your anecdote; for all we know, there is an outraged group working right now to have at least one of those billboards taken down. Still, I want to thank you for not deleting this. Your title and post make it clear that you think the problem is that women complain about being called fat or ugly, even though they do it themselves. So? Let them complain! Wear your "No fat chicks" shirt if you want to, but I am not fi…
/r/MensRights24/05/11 07:46 PM
3

It is not ok for the woman to make that comment - it is extremely unprofessional and risks losing a sensitive customer. Did you point this out to management? You don't seem to be offended by the comment itself, but rather that she was allowed to say something like that when men are not. Except that it does happen all the time, as InfiniteThirsting pointed out. There is a constant stream of sexual antics and innuendo at my workplace, which has a 50/50 gender ratio. Some guys were shooting hoops w…
/r/MensRights24/05/11 07:07 PM
1

In order: this is a female centric scholarship and women make up ~60% of enrollments at college and they give less back... I will ignore the last bit as opinion, and repeat that this was private money. No MR issue. She might help more men lose custody and more men end up in jail... Or she might learn to recognize the insanity in mainstream feminist dogma, and be able to really contribute to gender studies as a result. You and I can think what we want about the feminist grievance machine, but thi…
/r/MensRights23/05/11 06:58 AM
2

I can tell you exactly why I downvoted your thread. And you can't say that you were not warned. You asked if it was ok to post a thread like this, and were given this very good advice by fondueguy: Your a mother raising a son and you can definitely ask some questions that can make us pull our resources, get a discussion going, and hopefully help your son. The thing that's annoying is people who talk about how they're here to help x (related to men's rights) but end up looking for sympathy and at…
/r/MensRights23/05/11 06:29 AM
1

The MR issue here would be that there is no corresponding Men's Studies major on offer, anywhere. It is a right that we men need to fight for, instead of picking on a girl who is pursuing the same for her gender (with private money).
/r/MensRights23/05/11 05:41 AM
4

There is absolutely no rights or protection for men when it comes to their sperm. There is no contract, promise, condition, or crime that will allow a man to not be financially responsible for any child created. Cheat on him, lie to him, steal it from him, rape him for it - it does not matter. Lawyers call this strict liability, and here is a good article on just how deep it goes: http://www.supportguidelines.com/articles/art199903.html
/r/MensRights11/05/11 05:09 PM
3

Stop making me read TwoX! It makes my brain hurt. Today I learned that patriarchy does not mean men, just everything that is evil and wrong about the structure of power in society. In the same way feminism is not about women, but rather equality for both genders. And they say women are better with language?
/r/MensRights10/05/11 05:11 AM
2

Ah, deceptive marketing in the title - I am ok with that. Carry on then. Except for those who seem to hope that Ted will "die addicted and alone"; you're still assholes.
/r/MensRights10/05/11 05:00 AM
4

Seriously? The guy just got off the streets, and you are giving him flak for not refusing work unfit for our agenda? He didn't write the commercial; Kraft is responsible.
/r/MensRights10/05/11 04:39 AM
1

LOL. If you and fellow upvoters want it, then I will oblige. And I certainly don't want rantgrrl to hate me. ;-) I have had a few days to mull things over, however, so I may try posting my first thread instead of planting a wall of text here.
/r/MensRights07/05/11 05:40 PM
6

I would disagree that the legal system is tilted towards woman (sic), with the possible exception of child custody. (emphasis mine) Just admitting their privilege is more than many women can handle. Insensitivity to male suffering and a severely restricted gender role are serious issues, but deep ones with no easy solutions. As you pointed out, there are also problems that men face that could be fixed relatively easily by changing law and policy. Women and feminists both talk a great deal about …
/r/MensRights07/05/11 05:25 PM
1

Delightful bit of undiluted sexism for both genders. Still, the women got headlights, environmental controls, transformability, and built in weaponry. Men got a cellphone and a candy holder - what a ripoff.
/r/MensRights05/05/11 07:24 AM
8

An absolutely perfect end to my day! A group of women at work were engaging in their usual "why are men always..." conversations, when they made the serious mistake of asking me directly. I responded at length, but apparently it was not what they wanted to hear. Looking forward to reading more from you, girlwriteswhat.
/r/MensRights05/05/11 06:56 AM
1

OK, then perhaps you can explain to us just what modern feminism is. Because you are saying that everything is working out fine for you. I am not clear on how your children are situated, but you seem satisfied with the choices you were given. You have a career that pays well enough to support your family, and you are not shunned by society for the arrangement of that family. So, are we finished? Why are we paying money and attention to a parasitical industry interested only in self-perpetuation,…
/r/MensRights01/05/11 05:47 PM
6

There was a thread on MR misinformation, and this is a common one that bugs me. As the article itself points out, there was a reason that these tests were ordered. This fact alone says nothing about how common it is in the general populace, however.
/r/MensRights27/04/11 07:32 AM
5

Trigger warning, spoiler alert, NSFW, NSFL - they all let the reader know that what comes next may make them wish they had never clicked the link. It shows consideration for your reader, so it is not surprising that feminist websites are sensitive to female victims of sexual assault. The question is how far it should go. News outlets cover every sort of horrible crime and broadcast to a wide audience - labeling every article with trigger warnings for those who have it happen to them personally s…
/r/MensRights09/04/11 05:12 PM
1

Women claim that rape is the most traumatic exprience on Earth and yet they themselves wish it would happen to another woman. most men would never say something as disgusting as wishing for a woman to get raped. Please keep your generalizations consistent - most men AND women would never say something like this. The only point to be made here is that this was purportedly a feminist, and should have known better.
/r/MensRights09/04/11 04:50 PM
1

I have absolutely no problem for time off work when pregnant. I think governments should pay for this, so employers won't view a woman hire as a liability. If, in the future, a man should want to have his internal organs rearranged so he can carry a baby to term, he is more than welcome to claim some of my taxes. Physical and emotional stress can harm both the baby and the mother. Even if your political views lean to the right and you point out that the mother chose to do this, we are still rich…
/r/MensRights09/04/11 04:49 AM
1

Thanks for posting! I never considered that it may be the old male code, with its insistence that all men be strong and self-sufficient at all times, may actually be at the root of this. Women do not help men because the men would feel ashamed at needing a woman's assistance. It does not explain, however, why the women in my story were not offering help to another woman - especially when a child was involved.
/r/MensRights07/04/11 05:03 AM
2

I couldn't take more than 30 seconds, either. I am undecided if I pity these men for their delusions, or simply loathe their simple minds. This "divine feminine" New Age crap is just as harmful as outright misogyny in women's battle to be accepted for who they truly are.
/r/MensRights07/04/11 04:19 AM
3

If by coming to an end you mean that civilization will evolve into something completely new, then we agree. A real collapse? Unlikely. The MR movement is tracking the same course of evolution laid down by feminists. When their fight began, the women who eschewed the roles society demanded of them and campaigned openly for better treatment were ridiculed and shamed. Now it is the men who must endure people saying they are "just angry 'cause he can't get laid", or "whiners" by people like Scott Ad…
/r/MensRights06/04/11 05:51 AM
8

You are not alone in your opinion. Just today I witnessed a young mother get caught up as she tried to exit the rear doors of the bus with her child and stroller. I was sitting in the back, and the only other male passenger was at the very front. The rest of the passengers were all women (over a dozen of them). You can guess the rest of the story. Not one of the female passengers did anything more than gawk. Same for the female bus driver. I stood up and moved forward, while the other man actual…
/r/MensRights06/04/11 04:26 AM
1

I thought Adams managed to offend both men and women with his latest idiocy. I don't think he deserves financial ruin for his dated beliefs and closed mind, and I will continue to read Dilbert as long as he sticks to the business jokes.
/r/MensRights30/03/11 04:45 AM
1

Thanks. That was exactly the quote that came to my mind.
/r/MensRights18/03/11 06:34 PM
3

Both of those articles were a load of crap. The man's point was supposed to be how woman have to work harder to achieve success. The only thing his story showed was a hard working woman who got the job and was recognized for her quality, which actually goes against his intended argument. The woman's was even worse. Never in my presence has a woman's opinion been shot down with anything like "you're just a girl". But feminists love to play at knowing the unspoken. The woman was not rejected becau…
/r/MensRights08/03/11 08:01 AM
12

I agree that actuarial science is math, not personal bias, but why is health insurance different? If women cost more to insure, why should they not pay higher premiums?
/r/MensRights01/03/11 05:33 AM
2

Agreed. I will not lend any credence to someone who is so lost to unreasoning hatred. it is always the woman who is in the wrong anyway (and I do mean always). Really? Every single time?
/r/MensRights19/02/11 05:56 AM
2

Everyone already thinks we are all crazy over here in /mensrights, so why not give them something to talk about. Another upvote!
/r/MensRights11/02/11 09:30 PM
9

being a feminist means I'm all for equal rights for men and women Sorry, but it does not mean that. You may be a feminist and be all for equal rights for both genders, but I don't take that for granted from all feminists. When feminists were changing the child support system to make sure mothers received the financial support they expected when giving birth, where was their concern to make sure that the visitation rights of fathers would be given and enforced? When feminists were changing law en…
/r/MensRights11/02/11 09:22 PM
2

its hard to live with assorted testicles in my life, but I just suck it Now that was damn funny. Upvote. You were not the only one who thought the original post was outright misogyny. Glad to see that was not your intention, gadimus. As the posts following yours prove, there is no parody that cannot be mistaken for what some people truly believe.
/r/MensRights10/02/11 06:42 AM
2

I live in Ontario, and I cannot find a website listing all the thieves, murderers, bad check writers, pyromaniacs, etc. that are on the loose. The government is not enlisting my help to search out these harmful elements in my society. Why? There is no money in it. If the government was truly concerned for the welfare of children, they would at least enforce the visitation rights for the majority of men who are not awarded equitable custody. My brother can tell you, there is no help from the gove…
/r/MensRights05/02/11 06:55 AM
3

Thanks for typing that out; I was just going to downvote and move on. The assumptions are all for the worst, but you missed one - that the man does not like or want children. Many men love children and do not view the concomitant burdens so negatively.
/r/MensRights22/01/11 06:25 AM
2

The longevity bonus is not the responsibility of Social Security, and using the spouse's benefits is already pointed out as gender neutral as far as the law is concerned. What are widow's benefits? Here in Canada, we have Survivor Benefits (which are also gender neutral).
/r/MensRights11/01/11 07:07 AM
6

I post "Why is this in MR?" quite often (I disagree that we need to hear about women being bad all the time), but this one is legit. Public money or public spaces means open to the public. It is a simple rule that is still casually broken when it comes to men.
/r/MensRights11/01/11 06:23 AM
2

"I think the anonymity of the accused pre-charge is certainly something that should be properly explored. I've been looking back over my experience, which is extensive, and also talking to a colleague, who between us, have 50 years of experience in working in these types of cases, and neither of us could think of a single case that we had ever delt (sic) with, where publication of the identity of someone like Clive, who's given his account, had actually led to further complainants coming forward…
/r/MensRights08/01/11 09:19 AM
3

Agreed. I read all twelve pages of tomyhusband, and found only one outright offer: to memorize his favorite sandwich. Not make him one necessarily, and the irony kills me. Everything else was a demand, warning, compromise, or just a promise not to do bad things. Tomywife has only seven pages, and it is full of sacrifice: getting dinner and pumping gas in foul weather; giving up the only seat, the only sweater, the only umbrella; even risking the peril of subway grates. And it full of service: he…
/r/MensRights08/01/11 08:39 AM
5

Problem? Lucky kid! She's hot! So disappointing. I believe that children are too young to understand their own sexual desires or those of others. Too young to know and judge the risks of sexually transmitted diseases. Too young to be held responsible for the raising of another child. And too young to defend themselves against those who would use guile or force against them. If you think the age of consent is too high, then say so. Better yet, do something about it. Otherwise, just shut the fuck …
/r/MensRights08/01/11 07:33 AM
1

Introduced by Senator Céline Hervieux-Payette, whose homepage at eurekablog.ca has a number of keywords listed at the bottom. Spanking is one of those words. This bill certainly deserves a good spanking.
/r/MensRights01/01/11 04:46 AM
1

Damn, you beat me to it. Upvote. Both adjectives are positive, and you don't need to look hard for worse examples of daddy bashing.
/r/MensRights23/12/10 07:21 AM
3

Great. Five downvotes and still no reply to vile's question. Why IS this in Men's Rights?
/r/MensRights23/12/10 06:19 AM
2

Absolutely horrifying. I am confused, though - why are you crossposting this in MensRights?
/r/MensRights12/12/10 06:22 AM
1

She claims to be a four year veteran of Reddit, and yet she acts surprised to find a hostile reception at the MensRights subreddit for a woman making demands and "threats" at men, and not even related to men's rights. Troll, or brain dead; take your pick.
/r/MensRights27/11/10 06:29 AM
8

The data is still skewed by gender. Are you are saying women have better senses of humour?
/r/MensRights12/10/10 11:07 PM
10

The Y chromosome brings variability, so more males are morons. More men are geniuses, too.
/r/MensRights12/10/10 11:01 PM
1

They may be using the psychiatric definition which, according to online-medical-dictionary, is: Individual or group aggressive behavior which is socially non-acceptable, turbulent, and often destructive. It is precipitated by frustrations, hostility, prejudices, etc.
/r/MensRights08/10/10 08:50 PM
7

Why the hell are reporters allowed into the locker rooms? Interview them on the field, or else give the athletes time to put their clothes on and talk to them then. This whole gender nonsense would disappear entirely.
/r/MensRights24/09/10 03:16 PM
7

I have no problem with a woman being called a cunt if she has earned the title, but here you are just taking a shot at the entire gender. Are you really that angry with ALL women?
/r/MensRights24/09/10 02:18 PM
8

Really? I see JamEaterBlues as a very sensible poster, and these latest comments just added to that reputation. Why are you so surprised to be on the same side?
/r/MensRights22/09/10 06:58 AM
7

Several comments have tried to equate the harm done to someone falsely accused against the failure to punish the wrongdoers. But this is not the reason why "innocent until proven guilty" is the cornerstone of jurisprudence. The state is given immense power by the vast majority of its society, and this is why there needs to be checks and balances upon it. An innocent person cannot fight the all-powerful state; once convicted (and even before conviction for many falsely accused in public), it is n…
/r/MensRights14/09/10 08:32 PM
4

There should be four possible outcomes for every pregnancy: Father and mother want a baby. Go shopping for a bassinet. Father and mother do not want the baby. Mother gets an abortion, and they both share the cost. Or, if the mother is willing, the baby is carried to term and given up for an adoption; the mother (and father) are both giving up the rights and responsibilities to the child. Father wants a baby, but mother does not. Mother has same options as above (abort/adopt). Fathers who are str…
/r/MensRights15/08/10 07:50 PM
3

And I thought I had issues with women. FingerofDeath, you might want to fantasize about futures for humankind that don't involve the intellectual elites quashing the moronic masses - your evident lack of rationality puts you squarely in the latter camp. First you argue that because the quoted essay says that women are dumber then men, they should be disenfranchised. If intelligence is the criteria, why is it not all of the stupid people - male and female - that get put down? You throw out "facts…
/r/MensRights15/07/10 08:04 AM
1

"Gynocentric society"? You need to get some perspective, kanuk. You make several valid points (allowing for hyperbole), and this is why places like this subreddit need to exist. But we still have do a lot of work towards the equality of women, and remain a long way from the total subjugation of the male gender. The most irksome thing I noticed in the article , as I often do in such cases, is that there is a reference to Sword being "sexually and physically abused as a child". I do not begrudge h…
/r/MensRights14/07/10 06:44 PM
2

From what I read, the case is just getting started. How did you come to the conclusion that this is a "case in point" for someone trying to shake down Taylor through a rape accusation?
/r/MensRights14/07/10 05:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter