TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ThrillaDaGuerilla Archive

View 0 posts and 196 comments by ThrillaDaGuerilla on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
12

Too late in the game to bring this up....the damage is already done. This words have already lost their power....
/r/MensRights20/09/22 10:08 AM
3

Says the woman who can't define what a woman is..... She won't be elected because she's a fringe progressive and professional victim....it has nothing to do with her ovaries.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 01:56 PM
83

Well she's factually wrong....but that doesn't seem to matter much to a cheating harlot like her.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 07:14 PM
3

She has a few good points in that diatribe But here's the deal.... She's not entitled to respect from people she has no respect for...nor will she recieve the respect she believes she's entitled to until she's capable of extending that same respect.
/r/AntiFeminists27/08/22 02:40 PM
1

Might also go to show that the bar doesn't want the courts to be inundated with massive numbers of cases looking to have their alimony adjusted after nullifying decades of past case decisions inadvertently. ...but I'm just guessing on that.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 11:52 PM
11

Yes...racists like yourself get banned on reddit for being racist. Cope.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 08:40 PM
10

Exactly. Its everywhere and normalized...so much that it seems " natural" Everyone has seen the basic trope of " nothing sexier than man doing the dishes/vacuuming/etc"....its ingrained at this point. We've all fallen into that " trap" to one degree or another, but its only recently being addressed in phychology( most notably in books like "no more Mr nice guy" by Robert Glover..." and other complementary works works by DSO)
/r/MensRights07/08/22 01:20 PM
86

Its very common. Transactional sex is pretty big problem in marriages and lots of husbands arent even aware they are doing it.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 12:22 AM
2

I'm glad you're still with us fighting the good fight...good on you bro. Don't get me wrong , I do not support or advise anyone to just swallow their issues and walk em off....seeking help is one of the best thing a troubled guy can do, and there's zero shame in it. As I said, dudes are emotional creatures and absolutely need healthy outlets and coping mechanisms. Sometimes, that means professional help (been there , done that) That's a bit different topic than that of emotions in an relationshi…
/r/MensRights03/08/22 01:08 AM
2

It would be nice it was commonly understood....but its not. Its not just women who can't grasp it...there's a ton of men who don't either. There's no shortage of men who fall into that particular " trap", thinking they are doing the right thing. I don't know that its an "unfavorable trait" ,really....it serves a purpose, especially in choosing a suitable life-mate. I personally think its an extention/manifestation of the psychology behind " shit tests".( which men often fall prey to)
/r/MensRights02/08/22 05:38 PM
102

Correct...women usually can't handle an emotional man.....if they can handle it, they lose respect for you when you are emotional. Additionally, being emotional is not an attractive trait to women, regardless if they tell you they like it or not. All men are emotional.....so its not like you're strange. What separates men is not being emotional, but in what coping mechanisms they developed , and who they vent emotions to. If you ask my wife, she'll tell you I'm a rock...stoic and unwavering. Tha…
/r/MensRights02/08/22 01:33 PM
23

Of course there is.... Something something ...patriarchy.
/r/MensRights29/07/22 09:50 PM
2

I wouldn't count on the "honor system" working out well between 2 parents that , in most cases, have a beef against each other....it would be a nightmare. Its best to let a dispassionate 3rd party authority intervene if the need arises.
/r/MensRights25/07/22 04:58 PM
2

That's even less likely to happen...
/r/MensRights25/07/22 03:20 PM
2

Really?...you believe having you parental /financial decisions continually scrutinized by the government isnt a burden?
/r/MensRights25/07/22 02:42 PM
3

You're good man...at least you're using your noggin to come up with ideas....that's more than most folks do. I do think custodial parents should be held accountable, but like everything else, I think there need to be good cause to put a burden on them.....like , neglect or abuse.
/r/MensRights25/07/22 01:00 PM
3

Absolutely there's a difference between those expenditures.( earrings for mom and housing) ....but that's also where the fungible nature of money comes in to play.
/r/MensRights25/07/22 12:58 PM
6

You can petition the court in every jurisdiction if you feel the child is being neglected.....but yes, a few jurisdictions have mechanisms in place once its brought back to court and the judge finds neglect present. Neglect, however, is not presumed...it must be argued. From there, a judge can order the custodial parent to provide financials.( they can order that in every jurisdiction) Thats quite a bit different from your idea though....as you are requiring regulating expenditures regardless of…
/r/MensRights25/07/22 11:39 AM
-15

Good luck separating them...as most basic needs of the child are inherebtly inseperable from the custodial parent, just as they are with cohabitating parents. Housing, utilities, groceries, transportation...etc etc etc Clothing is easily separated, education and healthcare funding as well.....basic needs, however, are not. When you pay child support, the custodial parent will benefit right along with the child, as basic needs are generally inseparable and not individually funded. That's just rea…
/r/MensRights25/07/22 10:30 AM
-1

Interesting theory....but generally wrong. Child support is intended to financially help support a child, not be used 100% on the child, and only the child. For example, it can absolutely be utilized for housing and utilities, neither of which are solely about the child. Groceries, also a shared item between the kid and the parent. The custodial parent is also afforded the same discretion cohabitating parents are, provided the child is not neglected. If the custodial parent is not feeding the ki…
/r/MensRights25/07/22 10:02 AM
3

Maintenance meaning ...paying for things that break. Car, water heater, toilet... whatever breaks. Parents don't pay court ordered child support to each other, thats correct...but they generally pay to support the child nonetheless(duh) and decide among themselves how to allocate their incomes to whatever expenditures they want. But we arent talking about modes of income...your idea is about controlling expenditures. Why would you force a single parent to to have controlled expenditures and not …
/r/MensRights25/07/22 09:40 AM
-34

Do you also tear up when parents who are still together don't spend 100% of their money solely on their child?....are they also criminals, stealing from their child?
/r/MensRights25/07/22 09:07 AM
2

Where's the allowance for housing, utilities, transportation, maintenance?.... Will you also be forcing parents who are still together to adhere to this "childrens spending fund"?...if not...ask yourself why.
/r/MensRights25/07/22 09:01 AM
2

He's 2.....don't worry too much about it. He will most likely emulate the behaviors he's sees on a constant basis . ...meaning , you and your husband will be living and breathing examples for him, and how you carry yourselves and four relationship will be his guide for for how to carry himself and how to be in a relationship
/r/MensRights17/07/22 02:09 PM
63

No , its not. You got banned because the mod is a fragile dumbass, nothing more, nothing less. Its Reddit...it happens a lot.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 06:38 PM
2

Climb down off your white horse, put away your shining armor......this damsel cannot be saved by you. You are not equipped to save her. The more you tolerate her hatred of men, the more she loses respect for you.....and the more you show her that you lack self-respect.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 10:40 AM
1

Yeah....my lack of melodrama is kinda boring for those so inclined.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 03:03 AM
2

The issues arent on the chopping block. You provide evidence of a single justice's opinion they should be and ignored the opinions of the rest. As I said, when you only have 1 justice, you have nothing.. Carry on with your melodrama...I'll stick to facts and rationality.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 04:23 PM
2

What is your malfunction?.....I have zero problem acknolwedging there's a justice who think they should revisit same sex marriage, etc. I literally fucking said it in my post....the one you failed to fucking read. Leave me alone...you're either stupid or crazy, and I want no part of either.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 06:32 AM
6

Great great book...can absolutely be life changing for a lot of dudes, but should be read by all.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 11:24 PM
1

Yes...a single justice.....1....uno. As I clearly and unequivocally atates in my post...the post you chose not to read The other justices who cast to overturn RvW were very clear in saying this ruling has no affect on other cases. Why are you purposefully ignoring that fact?
/r/MensRights01/07/22 10:04 PM
1

Read my post again.....
/r/MensRights01/07/22 08:32 PM
13

If it makes you feel better....birth control and same sex marriage arent on the chopping block. A single justice said they need to look at those issues....the others explicitly say the overturning of roe has no effects on those cases. When you have only 1 justice, you've got nothing Other than that....yeah...you're gonna see a lot more disrespect and blame. Rationality and intelligence arent high on many peoples priority list right now.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 10:52 PM
22

Its rare to see people openly supporting discrimination based on race and sex.....but here you are, owning it. How brave of you.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 10:12 PM
44

I don't think infidelity is normalized.....I think its near the point of being celebrated. As long as its not you being cheated on, its very much a " you go girl/dude" thing.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 03:25 PM
5

Democrats being Democrats....same old story.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 05:29 PM
159

I support this endeavor. These dudes should not have children and voluntarily taking themselves out of the gene pool is a good thing for society.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 11:23 PM
3

Do you get visitation? Sole custody doesn't usually mean you cant be a father to her...it just means she will live full time with mom. Usually every other weekend visitation is granted, plus split holidays. Thats not the end....that's the beginning. You can held yourself a badass life, and be the supercool dad that gets to build awesome memories with your daughter, without the day to day " clean your room, do your homework" grind. If you lost both custody and visitation...there's something else …
/r/MensRights16/06/22 01:03 PM
35

Kinda hard not to when feminism has simply turned into man-hating on every level. Doesn't matter which way a man leans politically, he's seen as an enemy of sorts.
/r/MensRights08/06/22 05:45 PM
9

She doesn't respect you. And youve allowed her to disrespect you. Stand up for yourself...its the only way to regain respect. No need to cut ties with her...but you absolutely need to stand up for yourself. Don't argue the points she makes yet....start with telling her you won't tolerate her bullshit anymore, that she either show respect and common courtesy, or she can go piss up a rope.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 03:43 AM
2

Well, the simple indisputable fact is....Swedish women are not entitled to Swedish men. Even more basically put.....no woman is entitled to any man.( and no man is entitled to any woman) If Swedish women have a problem with immigrant wives....so what?...that's their problem, and no one else's. Everyone is free to pick the spouse of their choosing, for any reason they want.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 03:45 PM
1

That would be called " child neglect"....usually, the kids are taken and given to people like me( foster parents), and the parents are given a chance to unfuck themselves before they lose custody entirely....sometimes they do, sometimes they don't. If there is abuse present, which usually runs hand in hand with neglect, thats generally when criminal charges are filed. I get that you are opposed to parents supporting their kids...but you'll find that you don't have any real allies in that particu…
/r/MensRights10/05/22 06:43 PM
0

Oy vey Go ahead and die on this moronic hill you built....I care not. Literally every single court and government in the western world agrees with me....I don't need you to.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 06:31 PM
0

Yes...neglect is handled by CPS and criminal courts. That's because its illegal to neglect your children Your theory says the custodial parent can legally neglect the child....and that's very very far from being true. What you are trying to say is that the non-custodial parent is required to pay cash payments. And that part is true....they are. The custodial parent doesn't pay cash payments to themselves, after all. They are at still required to financially support their children, though.....or …
/r/MensRights10/05/22 04:52 PM
0

If you're divorced and not living at the home, it won't matter. My experience with CPS is vastly different...I haven't detected any institutional bias as of yet.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 04:45 PM
1

Lol...amazing. Let me ask you a quick question.....why do child neglect laws exist? According to your personal theory of family law...neglect is an impossibility, as parents aren't required to financially support their children.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 03:23 PM
1

I dunno...I deal with CPS almost on a daily basis( it comes with being a foster parent)....I have nothing but respect for them and their " mission". Sucks that they are underfunded and understaffed, but thats nothing new. I'm actually thinking of joining their ranks after I retire, if its even possible. I'm not sure why you believe it is " dangerous"...can you elaborate more on that?
/r/MensRights10/05/22 01:16 PM
1

Can. Won't. Its probably the weirdest request I've ever received online, and I've been online since the beginning. Its like questioning the existence of gravity.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 12:39 PM
3

Lol...."theocracy."
/r/MensRights10/05/22 12:22 PM
1

No.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 12:17 PM
1

That's a case of neglect, and she should be held accountable, 100% That's when you call CPS and start that process....build the case and get those kids out of there. I know a few dudes that now have full custody of their kids because of situations similar to yours. The governments role in enforcing payments stems directly and soley from dead beat parents not supporting their kids. The answer was NEVER going to be allowing them to vacate their responsibilities, or restrict the rights of the custo…
/r/MensRights10/05/22 11:30 AM
1

Sometimes, yes....sometimes no. You keep reaching for excuses not to support your kids. Dead beat parents have no allies...except other dead beat parents. Exactly none of your arguments are original or new....all have been covered in the past, and dismissed as nonsense, by every state, and every western nation. Its probably time to set aside your problem with supporting your kids and get on board with the rest of humanity. There are problems with the child support system, surely....but what you …
/r/MensRights10/05/22 11:18 AM
2

Sorry, that's 100% false.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 11:10 AM
0

Its in the name ...child support. Parents, whether together or apart, are obligated to financially support thier kids. Parents, whether together or apart ,are NOT obligated to spend all of the money directly on the child, though. The State defers to the parents on how to spend the money. In the case of a divorce, the State defers to the custodial parent on how to spend the money. Unless there is neglect or abuse, the State doesnt generally interfere with parental discretion. Why do you believe a…
/r/MensRights10/05/22 09:23 AM
14

Men have been fighting for womens issues for decades and decades and decades. Women have been fighting for men's issues since .....never. I'm not an MRA , and even I can see that.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 02:18 AM
-7

I need a better argument?...lol Its not my argument that's universally wrong and has exactly zero legal backing... in every jurisdiction in the country.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 01:57 AM
-1

Yup...its pretty universal....and its gonna stay that way ( thankfully). They also don't track alimony expensitures...or social security expenditures...or disability ....or VA benefits....or any other expenditures, really. Do you really want the government tracking your expenditures?
/r/MensRights10/05/22 01:12 AM
6

There is no obligation to spend child support money directly on the child....in any state. Just like there is no obligation for couples who are still together to spend their money directly on the child. ( yea, married couples also take trips to Cancun) And no, you can't get an audit of expenditures, unless you can prove neglect....and even then, they wont tell you shit about the custodial parents expenditures If the child is cared for ....there is nothing the State can or will do. And none of th…
/r/MensRights09/05/22 07:24 PM
1

Its probably a popular opinion...among people who pay child support anyways. The State will absolutely not acknowledge that opinion though, and never will.....its long been settled. You'll never be granted even an audience with the court to go over the expenditures in question, as the State will ALWAYS defer to the custodial parents decisions.( unless neglect or abuse are alleged...and they still won't audit expenditures even then) You are seeing the unfairness...but not thinking it through. Do …
/r/MensRights16/04/22 06:11 PM
1

Again, the state defers to the custodial parents judgement in determining expenditures....just the same as it does when a couple is still together. The state doesn't inferere in those choices , which are best left to the parents. Do you want the State having control over everyone with kids financial choices? Additionally, its not just her rent...its also the child's rent. And yes, rent is part of supporting a child....so is food, electricity, clothes..and whatever else the custodial parent decid…
/r/MensRights16/04/22 05:34 PM
1

Again, the courts federally defer to the caretaker of the kid..because, well, they actually care for the child. The provider role and caretaker roles are not the same. In any event, the single custodial parent will generally have to work post divorce....primarily because the provider role is vacant. What is not vacated is the noncustodial parents obligation to provide for the child, though.....and that's not going to change, ever. You can divorce a spouse, but you can't divorce your own children…
/r/MensRights16/04/22 05:02 PM
1

Its common for 1 spouse to work and the other to stay home and care for the children. In fact, its been the norm for centuries....it wasn't until very recently that a slim majority of households became 2 income earner households( 53%) ....and the stay at home parenting model is miles better for children than not having a primary caretaker in the home. In any event, whatever personal decisions are made or not made before having kids and divorcing is irrelevent . It changes nothing about current c…
/r/MensRights16/04/22 04:50 PM
0

Making money doesn't make one a good caretaker......it merely makes one a good provider. For example, I'm the better provider than my wife....but she is, by far, the better caretaker. When it comes to my ex, I was the only provider, and the vastly better caretaker. The courts will almost always defer to the primary caretaker....unless they can be proven to be unfit.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 05:22 PM
-3

Yikes. No.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 02:40 PM
5

I know a couple that does that already....no child support from either, shared custody...etc.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 01:08 PM
-5

I get that many dudes have a problem with how child support system is structured....but its odd that that so many think that the mom paying bills/rent/etc isn't supporting the child.....very odd indeed. If you were still together, does all your money go to clothes and toys for the kid?...of course not...it goes to bills/rent/mortgage/etc. If you would change things coincide with your opinion....how would you change it? Have the government audit every household that recieve child support and only…
/r/MensRights15/04/22 12:26 PM
9

From what ive heard...it was all males. I have an employee with kids at this school...and this isn't the first " scandal " that's taken place there.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 03:55 PM
7

Don't sweat it....there's ALWAYS a place for the masculine man. Wherever there's a place for them, there will be dudes to fill the role.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 08:57 PM
4

Touch my wife and you'll catch a beating. Disrespect my wife verbally, you'll be spoken to. How you react to being spoken to will determine if you catch a beating or not. Pretty simple concept.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 04:40 AM
11

Neither you nor me know that...let's not pretend we do
/r/MensRights25/03/22 11:56 AM
14

So she cheats on him , falsely accuses him of DV and rape...and he snaps and goes full monster, doing the unthinkable and unforgivable. God, what a shitshow.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 10:29 AM
24

Those are 2 concerns, but not reasons to avoid ONSs. ONS are great for temporary safisfaction, but at the cost of your overall self-esteem. That's the primary reason to avoid them.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 01:48 PM
5

It looks more like...you're not well in the head.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 05:06 PM
21

Nothing qualifies a person for recordkeeping so much as their skin color. ...well, except what genitals they possess anyways.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 02:40 PM
2

OK, bright one. Have a good day.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 04:02 PM
0

Getting downvoted by people who defend a rapist an abuser isn't a bad thing, chief. The funny thing is....y'all are more militant against her than John is....its really weird.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 12:36 PM
1

Lol...yeah, I'm sure an education is threatening to you.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 12:15 PM
2

Well alright....then your argument is with the entire legal/justice system. Good luck with that.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 09:37 AM
0

I don't take kindly to gaslighting. Your question is dishonest and ignores every detail possible, except for the mutilation itself. Legal defenses exist for a reason. Mitigating factors exist for a reason. Its unwise to ignore them
/r/MensRights09/03/22 09:34 AM
0

Lol. It rare tosee someone be so wrong about so many things in such a short paragraph. Well done.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 09:28 AM
0

I'm sorry you're uneducated, but that can be rectified.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 09:24 AM
1

The jury In her case disagrees with your uninformed opinion. Pick an different hill to die on.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 09:20 AM
1

Our justice system accomodates for things like temporary insanity/crimes of passion....and adjudicated accordingly. Why aren't you aware of this? Revenge is generally illegal, as its inherently premeditated and with malice. Temporary insanity precludes both premeditation and malice. People , from time to time , lose their cotton picking minds. Like when a dude comes some to hid wife getting banged in his bed...or when a woman is abused and raped by her husband. Our justice system correctly accom…
/r/MensRights09/03/22 02:08 AM
0

My preference is irrelevent ...I'm not the one who was in an abusive marriage. Exactly no one knows how they will react in those situations Its very common for people to stay in those situation, until they snap, or snap out of it. I'm only arguing to not put John on some sort of victim pedestal....or use him to push an agenda/narrative. He's a serial abuser and a degenerate....not someone you want to hoist up to prove a point.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 01:59 AM
-6

I don't mind the downvotes....it comes with defying the popular narrative of whatever sub you happen to be in....they mean nothing I happen to know both parties in that particular mess, and have a different perspective on matters....so I'm not coming at those from the same angle some folks are. The narrative being pushed her is a mischaracterization of what happened, and who these people actually are....that's just reality. Posts like this do real damage to any progress MRAs would like to make
/r/MensRights09/03/22 01:49 AM
-2

I don't think its necessarily "justified"...I just think it was a trauma response. Before Lorena , there was Francine Wilson. She set her abusive husband on fire as he slept. Justified?...I dunno....trauma responses are unpredictable, so it a hard to gauge. In any event , I don't lose sleep over an abuser getting fucked up...and I sure as hell won't go to bat for one , male or female.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 01:42 AM
-11

No, she wasnt convicted later on.. Charges were dropped after an altercation with her mom....there's nothing else. No, it wasn't a mutually abusive relationship...it was decidedly one-sided abuse. He's gone on to 4 more DV cases...among other unrelated charges ( theft, shoplifting, etc) Her action was heinous and shocking , no doubt...buth there's no need to minimize his actions.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 10:11 PM
0

Temporary insanity. Its a trauma response...her mental healthcare wasnt a " punishment", but a treatment. It wasnt a reciprocal abusive relationship. The abuse was 1 way, and prolonged( even John admits as much)...followed by a pretty nasty deed in return.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 10:06 PM
-23

I believe her... Full disclosure...I know both her and John. She was aquitted because of temporary insanity., subsequently remanded to a mental health hospital for a couple of months, and ordered ongoing therapy for 3 years. He was aquitted because of not meeting standards of the specific law itself ( marital rape can only be convicted if the spouses live separately, or if there is serious bodily damage evident). There was evidence and testimony. Multiple witnesses testified of her bruising , an…
/r/MensRights08/03/22 06:54 PM
1

Good for you?
/r/MensRights24/02/22 03:55 PM
1

Maybe so, but I'm consistent in my principles. You?
/r/MensRights24/02/22 03:55 PM
1

Maybe so, but I'm consistent in my principles. You?
/r/MensRights24/02/22 03:46 PM
626

Take advantage of the discrimination the usually whine about.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 08:00 AM
1

Its not....women definitely need to step up as well. its not a competition. The only person you're actually in competition with is your ideal self, no one else. Lots of people don't want to have kids, and that's fine . The ideal is take responsibility before you create them, not cast away responsibility afterwards. Fact of matter is this....if you don't want kids, don't prioritize getting your nut over your entire future, and always protect your sperm....end of story. If you're not willing to ta…
/r/MensRights21/02/22 02:54 PM
1

Theres absolutely no reason to be convinced of either " maybe"....there just no way we can know, ergo , it a silly argument Either way, it doesn't matter much.....what's done is done.
/r/MensRights21/02/22 12:51 PM
1

Yeah...if she can't handle , she needs to grow up. ....but not the father, he doesnt need to grow up...nah, he can just take out his issues on the 1 innocent party in the whole drama. If the truth trumps all, like you said.. How do you reconcile that with your words " its not his kid if he doesn't consent"? Right here , right now....that's a false statement....its not true. And don't put words in my mouth again...I didn't say anything should be this way or that way. If You wanna lecture about tr…
/r/MensRights21/02/22 12:43 PM
1

He can feel whatever he wants to feel, that's fine. yes, a man has limited options when it comes to pregancies/kids. There is a definite imbalance/injustice within the laws there, that needs to be rectified. My beef is him wanting to lay his problem on his daughter. If you want to lay your problems/issues on your kids, you're a piece of shit....doesn't matter if the kid was wanted or not.
/r/MensRights21/02/22 11:41 AM
0

My point is that he doesnt know if it was sabotaged or not...and neither do you. Maybe to happened , maybe it didn't...either way, its just a story of a dude with regrets.
/r/MensRights21/02/22 11:25 AM
3

Your parent told you at 12 or 13 that they didn't want you?
/r/MensRights20/02/22 09:09 PM
-41

I didn't say he did. Condoms break ...it happens.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 05:11 PM
2

I read and understand just fine...thanks.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 05:00 PM
-86

A dude regretting his actions isn't illegal.... He's just trying to blame someone else for his own issues.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 03:42 PM
-35

Don't ever....ever.....tell your daughter any of this. Its ridiculously unfair to unload your bullshit on to her. Hell, the condom may have just failed, and not been sabotaged....you have no idea what happened. Why you need or convince yourself that she did it is your issue, but recognize that you don't actually know. I feel bad for your daughter...hopefully she doesn't know her own father resents her existence. Fucking ridiculous.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 03:40 PM
1

That's a fair point about not posting such things here. I'm not really a MRA( even though i agree on many points) but I get where youre coming from.
/r/MensRights19/02/22 06:27 PM
10

Holy overreactions....Why you triggered?...the data hit home for you or something? Are the researchers also misogynists?...you know, the many scientists who compiled the data over decades? Those isn't mystery or controversial.....female promiscuity is correlated with many behaviors , proclivity to infidelity being just one.
/r/MensRights19/02/22 06:17 PM
8

Personally pro-life...period. Politically pro-choice with a time limit
/r/MensRights14/02/22 01:10 PM
3

Its the same planet. I'm only 4 years younger than the OP, and his experience is very far from mine. I read his post and thought he might be closer to 107 rather than 57.
/r/MensRights05/02/22 09:30 PM
2

Lol....in the history of things working against people invested in their chosen " ism".. this is near the bottom of the list. When people come looking for a fight, just don't give them one.....leave them to their anger.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 07:00 PM
2

Don't punt her....just don't engage with her. You're not obligated to put up with her bullshit, so don't. Leave her alone to yell at the patriarchial clouds.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 06:56 PM
406

When people vote to give themselves money from the coffers....don't be surprised to be required to work longer to keep those coffers full.....thats the real world. ....and to whine when they are being held to the same standard men are , in terms of retirement age, smacks of entitlement and advantage. The current scheme they have is blatant gender discrimination....and these feminists are protesting to keep that discrimination going, because they benefit from it.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 12:46 PM
2

That's the worst part....the knowing and remembering. Its shitty all around, but at least infants dont have a memory of it.
/r/MensRights13/01/22 02:55 PM
1

Don't be....I'm in my mid 50's now....while its a memory I wish I didn't have, its certainly not the only , or worst, memory I wish I didn't have. I've no memory as to why it was done...just that it was very painful, required an additional surgery a day later, and I was in the hospital for a week. The good news is, my pop dated a lot of showgirls and cocktail waitresses back then ( Las Vegas, in the 70's)...and I had a ton of incredibly beautiful women visit and pamper me.
/r/MensRights13/01/22 02:54 PM
4

..yeah....baby boys. I was 8.
/r/MensRights12/01/22 11:31 PM
9

You can set down a boundary, but I guarantee they will say that you are magically excluded from their list of people they hate. " I hate men, men suck....but not you, you're one of the good ones". Its socially acceptable to hate men and white people...but that doesn't mean you need to tolerate it. It just means you can't look to external forces to help correct bad behavior, and you must do it yourself. Have a friendly chat , educate them...but inform them you will not tolerate their bigotry any …
/r/MensRights12/01/22 04:35 PM
12

Is anyone surprised? Anyone? Bueller?.... Bueller?.......
/r/MensRights12/01/22 04:14 PM
-3

What...the....fuck? I'm not a feminist.... Emotional stability is an attractive trait in men , end of story. Is it biology?..I don't know that...maybe, maybe not. Its as old as time , though. Enotional stability does NOT equate to not having emotions, or having to hide them, or not having healthy coping mechanisms....its about the ability to control your emotional responses ( outside of trauma responses). You can go off half cocked and yell at clouds all you want , but you're barking up the wron…
/r/MensRights12/01/22 10:36 AM
-2

Well , I agree with her, and I'd wager most reasonable people would, men and women. Her position is not unreasonable in the least....emotional stability is simply an attractive trait in men, and has been for as long as our species has existed....its definitely the norm.
/r/MensRights12/01/22 09:20 AM
-11

Me neither....
/r/MensRights11/01/22 06:57 PM
5

...." And he agreed". Doesn't matter at this point...but whatever was going on, they both agreed.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 01:42 PM
2

I would describe it as somewhere between fantastic and stellar.( and she agrees) Wasn't always that way, but it is now.( I fucked up bad 13 years ago and we recovered) We had a normal marriage for a long time...and to be honest, normal sucks. Then we had problems for a few years...and then we changed. What has never changed is me and showing my emotions, though.....I've always been stoic that way. She has told me innumerable times that she wouldn't be with me if I wore my emotions on my sleeve. …
/r/MensRights27/12/21 06:20 PM
4

Exactly. Stoicism is the name of the game.....as a bonus, it keeps your woman interested if youre a mystery. In 32 years of marriage, ive cried maybe 10 times. Exactly none of them in front of my wife.
/r/MensRights27/12/21 02:29 PM
9

Yes, there's a financial component to this....and also a cultural one. As in, the male is seen as having a responsibility to provide for his family , especially kids. Providing security for the family unit is a distinctly male responsibility in our culture. ( sure women provide as well, to be sure, but that's never been seen as a cultural responsibility for the female.) The courts reinforce this cultural belief.
/r/MensRights21/12/21 10:25 PM
2

It was once one....now its the other. You are free to agree with the phrase, and I'm free to think its utter trash.
/r/MensRights20/12/21 02:31 AM
5

The early 1900's is when the phrase was coined. I'm not interested in having a discussion about feminism or the trials and tribulations of women....I came to comment on the phrase.
/r/MensRights19/12/21 09:50 PM
5

Yes...that's how it a intended. The husbands happiness is not part of that particular equation....its self evident. It doesn't matter what it was like in the early 1900's ...today is today, and those whom use the phrase intentionally dismiss half of the spouses in order to portray that only the wifes happiness matters...or the husbands happiness is wholly dependant on the wifes happiness. Either way...its a garbage sentiment....utter trash.
/r/MensRights19/12/21 08:53 PM
4

I'm aware of where it originates.....and , more to the point, im aware of its modern usage.
/r/MensRights19/12/21 07:46 PM
541

Every time I hear the phrase " happy wife, happy life"....I immediately correct it with " happy spouse, happy house". The idea that the husbands happiness doesnt count, as is intended with that phrase, in 100% grade A feminist bullshit. Both spouses happiness needs or be tended to or it won't work.....1 or birth of you will be unhappy. I've been married for 32 years....that " happy wife , happy life" shit isn't welcome in our home.
/r/MensRights19/12/21 08:34 AM
4

I almost always advise people to become the best version of themselves they can possibly be. I do not advise them to become the best version of what society thinks they should be. Societal standards are a lot like communism....sounds great on paper, but completely unrealistic in the real world. Be healthy, be fit, be confident in yourself, and have a mission (whatever passion or interest you're into)....that stuff is a million times better than having that chiseled chin or sculpted Greek god bod…
/r/MensRights17/12/21 02:03 PM
1

You looking at shit all wrong, like so many men do. You don't live your life striving for approval from your wife or society.....you seek only the approval of yourself. Having other people, even your wife, validate your existence is bullshit. You have to look in the mirror and be happy with yourself first....when you hit that level, others will follow your lead. That's how you become respected. If you want to be the provider/protector because that's the role that brings you joy..you fucking do i…
/r/MensRights30/09/21 03:24 AM
3

If this was 30-40 years ago...I'd have a little respect for them. Not so much nowadays....feminism has morphed into a supremacist ideology/religion, and I'm not keen on that bullshit. When I hear about a dude who call himself a feminist I immediately get " nice guy" vibes.
/r/MensRights26/08/21 06:37 PM
1

Might be because men in general are raised to " fix" things rather then throw them away permanently. ....coupled with the idea that all men have that they will be be screwed over in a divorce, and don't want to self harm.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 10:56 AM
2

I'd simply divorce her....no need for further details, no need to understand her motives or intents. She's not cut out for marriage....period, end of story.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 12:17 PM
10

Of course men are allowed to cry...but its not generally found to be an attractive trait, as it displays the man is not in control of his emotions. Women do like their men to have a feminine side, but that's not defined the way you think it is. Its usually defined as being confident, but also stepping outside of gender norms on such things as household duties, grooming , and hygiene. Emotional outbursts aren't on any list of desirable traits....and , as it turns out, emotional unavailable men at…
/r/MensRights29/07/21 05:23 PM
2

Thats pretty much true...and won't change....ever. The courts presume the child is adequately supported until otherwise claimed. A financial audit can be ordered in cases of neglect or abuse where a noncustodial parent is seeking changes to custody orders. IOW, they can do it...but not without a reason. It sounds good, in theory, to have audits...but its not practical...nor is it required for parents who arent divorced. Its simply a presumption the court take that the custodial parent/parents ad…
/r/MensRights28/07/21 09:34 PM
-1

What do you mean by " support actually goes to the child's welfare"? Examples?
/r/MensRights28/07/21 08:37 PM
-6

True enough..but family courts look at the best Interests of the child, not justice.
/r/MensRights28/07/21 05:02 PM
21

I think the State should pay him back. I'd like to say the mom, but that ultimately hurts the kid. Child support is mandates by the state, and the State should do its due diligence in making sure they are forcing the correct person to pay. If they find out the wrong guy has been paying, i think its on the State to reimburse him and seek those funds from the correct dude. Of course, all of this stuff can be remedied by requiring a paternity test for every birth....all of them. Every single one.
/r/MensRights28/07/21 01:17 PM
1

Whose boots am I licking exactly?....be specific.
/r/MensRights26/07/21 02:45 PM
1

Lol!...OK incel.
/r/MensRights26/07/21 12:28 PM
0

" reasonable" is most often subjective.... My wife married me 31 years ago.. a single father of 2...she's probably the most reasonable person I know. Lots of folks don't mind marrying people with kids. With the amount of men and women, with kids, divorcing, its certainly part of the social/dating landscape Personally, I love kids...my own bio-kids, my adopted kids, and my foster kids. I take the responsibility of taking care of them, as that's what a man does.( protect the weak and provide for h…
/r/MensRights26/07/21 12:24 PM
0

Your second paragraph is probably true The first one, not so much.
/r/MensRights26/07/21 12:12 PM
1

Yup....clearly reading comprehension escapes you. Good god...lol!
/r/MensRights26/07/21 12:40 AM
1

I see reading comprehension isn't your strong suit. Imagine my surprise. fuckin' incels.
/r/MensRights26/07/21 12:39 AM
1

The new husband is NOT the father...its not a hard concept to understand, even for dolts. It is NOT his legal or moral obligation to be a cuck for the real father, unless he chooses to adopt the kid. None of you are spitting facts...not a single one....your spitting gibberish...incel gibberish, like little spoiled boys. Grow the fuck up and at least pretend to be a responsible human. Here's a fact..YOU are responsible for your OWN children..legally, morally,and ethically....period. That is uncon…
/r/MensRights26/07/21 12:35 AM
0

They are wise words coming from anyone. I'm very far from being a feminist, btw....but you cretins are pretty much the same as feminazis....just the flip side of the same crazy coin. The MRM is NOT about running away from responsibility....its the exact opposite, ....and you clowns are fucking it up with your moronic incel bullshit. Child support is not slavery, dolt....that's a fucking ignorant claim by ignorant people. Never adopt the opinion of ignorant people. Do some men get fucked over by …
/r/MensRights25/07/21 08:20 PM
1

these guys are complaining about paying for their OWN kids, not other dudes kids.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 08:13 PM
1

Thats true. He didn't claim anything normal or factual though.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 08:11 PM
1

Clearly not. How do you not know my favorite food?...you certainly believe you know me, so it should be easy to answer. If course, me and you both know you're full of shit, but you're too cowardly to admit it, like every other boy pretending to be man.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 08:09 PM
1

Your claim, your responsibility. Oh, that's right...you're opposed to responsibility, my bad. I'll just call it bullshit...and your failure to prove your wild claim just validates that its bullshit.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 08:05 PM
0

Lol!.....don't be an idiot.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 08:03 PM
0

Oh look...another " man" opposed to taking care of his own kids. It ain't simpin' to support your own kids...its called being man and being responsible for your actions. Hopefully one day you learn that basic concept.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 08:02 PM
1

I'm not the one who trotted out having sources for eild claims.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 08:00 PM
1

What's my favorite food?
/r/MensRights25/07/21 02:03 PM
1

That's what I thought....you got nothing to prove your fantastical claim.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 01:48 PM
2

Somewhat. Here in Texas...its simple math...pretty cut and dry really. There's even an online child support calculator the state provides. Overall, women are much better manipulators. They are, literally , trained from birth to manipulate.( mostly for good, but for evil as well)
/r/MensRights24/07/21 11:41 PM
1

Bring out your sources.....make em good ones.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 11:37 PM
1

Cool story. Stfu and pay for the kids YOU created.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 11:34 PM
1

Not a single rational sequence huh? I'm literally arguing that men should support the kids they create, and that's not rational? Are you out of your fucking mind? I'm not trolling anyone...I'm coming down hard on men who are arguing they should NOT be responsible for their own kids. Paying for your own kids is NOT a human rights violation....what an absolutely absurd position to take.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 11:23 PM
1

Depending on the state, he may or may not be entitled to a deviation petition to adjust his child support. Here in Texas...marital status doesn't matter to child support amounts. It doesn't matter which parent gets remarried, the child support amount won't neccesarily change. A few exceptions to that would be is she was working, remarried, and then became a stay at home mom...her new husbands income would factor in ....but that's a matter for lawyers to determine. But yeah, in general, remarryin…
/r/MensRights24/07/21 11:17 PM
1

Outliers are exceptions to rules....you'll find no shortage of women punished for neglecting / abusing their kids, in accordance with the laws against child neglect and abuse. I have sources that say some person hit the powerball, that doesn't make hitting the powerball the rule, it makes it the exception...the outlier. And yes, women have got away with some heavy shit, as do men, so what? ..outliers don't prove the rules.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 09:51 PM
1

Shame away kid, doesn't bother me....I'm secure as fuck in my position and manhood. Its sad your feelings are hurt by words, but not hurt by opposing supporting your own fucking kids. That's the kind of "man" you are....the kind that won't even support his own kids. " slavery"....utter nonsense. Im not anti-male at all...not even a little bit. I'm anti-stupidity, though. If you're a stupid dude like yourself, feel secure that its your stupidity and not your male-ness that I take exception with.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 09:41 PM
1

Remind away , cretin. Rational grown ass men that don't run away from responsibilities understand where I'm at.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 09:35 PM
1

You didn't correct shit...you regurgitated the same bullshit you said before. Bullshit said twice is still bullshit. Your opinion that mothers are free to neglect and abuse children is factually and legally incorrect. Its 100% bullshit...unadulterated bullshit. Do better.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 09:29 PM
1

Bash men? Nah...I fully support mens rights and the accompanying issues....I am one, after all. I bash little boys pretending to be men while they argue to vacate their responsibilities though....that shit isn't a "men's right issue", its literally the opposite. (Rights don't exist without a corresponding responsibility) Feminists, especially 4th wave, make the mistake of not calling their own out on their bullshit....I don't make that mistake with men. I expect them to be better...more rational…
/r/MensRights24/07/21 09:26 PM
1

Do you understand?.... That's not readily apparent. What does a married father who is raising his kids with his wife do? Does he directly hand a toddler 300 bucks a week...or does he simply pay the necesaary bills, like rent/ mortgage, utilities, food, clothing, transportation, household supplies, etc? If you guessed the latter, you'd be correct. If you also guessed that child support monies go towards the SAME GODDAMNED THINGS, in the case they divorce, you'd also be correct. They are considere…
/r/MensRights24/07/21 08:41 PM
1

I'm sorry you're opposed to supporting your own children. Like I said, don't have kids and there will be no problem. In the meantime, ask yourself why you believe other people should support YOUR kids. Every man should trust me...I'm rational, reasonable, and wont tell them lies like " child support is slavery". Unlike you, I'll always steer a man to be the best version of himself, for himself. Little bitches guide men to vacate their responsibilities and principals.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 08:01 PM
1

Nobody " sane" would describe child support as slavery. Being responsible is often unpleasant, but that doesn't change the fact you are , indeed, responsible. And no, no one is free to neglect and abuse their kids....that's fucking absurd....shut the fuck up with that nonsense. There's a lot of room for Improvements in child support schemes....but the insititution itself is sound, morally and ethically.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 07:43 PM
1

Its "bald-faced" liar...not "barefaced". You're free to point out any lies ive told...I have no problem setting you straight. I'm having fun , why would I leave? People like you shouldn't be active in mens rights groups...you give men's rights a bad name. So far, you've only proven that you are opposed to taking responsibility for your actions. That's not what men's rights is about. Its not unjust for you to take reaponsibility for kids you fathered....its morally, ethically, and financially jus…
/r/MensRights24/07/21 07:26 PM
1

Lol. Logic....it obviously evades you. If you're looking for sympathy for having to support kids you created, you won't find much. There's very little sympathy for deadbeat parents.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 07:16 PM
-1

Jesus, you're just the male version of a Feminazi.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 06:37 PM
1

No....but I'm not surprised a "man" like you doesn't quite understand.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 06:32 PM
1

Its no more slavery than staying together and raising your kids is slavery. I do have the moral high ground, clearly, obviously, and objectively. I'm not actively opposing taking care of a child I fathered ....you are. Easy solution....never father a child. You'll never be a "slave" And be honorable and inform any woman who happens to get near you that you will not support any kids fathered by you, lest you be a slave....the least you can do is warn them of your position. A real man would.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 06:30 PM
0

Child support is for the children, but is intended to defray ALL the costs associated with raising a child...the money does not have to be spent directly on the child . Housing , transportation, food, utilities, etc ...all of that is neccesaary to raise a child. Yes, expenditures are generally administered by the parent who has primary custody. The only remedy, and its rare, is if the custodial parent is neglecting the child. The noncustodial parent can petition for a change to the custody agree…
/r/MensRights24/07/21 06:22 PM
1

That's not true. Generally, both parents are required to consent to adoption. If one is an absentee parent, the court will determine whether the absentee parents has to consent or whether their parental rights have been vacated by abandonment. Unmarried fathers must meet a few requirement to object to adoption, though...they have to establish paternity, and demonstrate a commitment to parenting. Thats it. In addition to my 5 biological children , we have adopted 3.( and fostered 7) I've been thr…
/r/MensRights24/07/21 06:11 PM
1

Lots of good points there....but a few not-so-good. Successful marriages do NOT require agreement on religion or politics. His resentment over the abortion is certainly irrational though.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 05:42 PM
0

Good..I'm not interested in the beliefs of pieces of shit who are opposed to supporting kids they create.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 05:34 PM
0

Prove it.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 05:30 PM
0

Prove it.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 05:30 PM
1

I'm sorry you're opposed to supporting the child you created. I suggest not creating children, so you aren't bothered by that responsibility
/r/MensRights24/07/21 05:29 PM
-1

Factually incorrect. Be smarter.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 05:27 PM
-2

No....its none of the above. My ex wife paid child support to me for 16 years....was she a slave as well?
/r/MensRights24/07/21 05:23 PM
2

True....but the father and mother are both responsible for supporting the child. Once a couple splits, that doesn't change the responsibility. After a divorce, whichever parent refuses to pay for the support of the child they created is a deadbeat.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 05:17 PM
-1

Wrong, he has rights as a father. The parents are both morally and legally responsible for supporting the child.....period, end of story.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 05:14 PM
0

Untrue...he still has rights.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 05:13 PM
1

Yes....I do overwhelmingly approve of people supporting the children they create. Its very telling that you see that as a negative. Keep your deadbeat dad bullshit to yourself, you utter cretin.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 04:35 PM
3

You're paying for you child, not your ex-wife....get it straight. Child support and Alimony are not the same thing. The new man might be her legal husband...but you are still the childs legal father regardless.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 10:48 AM
9

Its still your child.....that's why you support it. Her marriage is irrelevent. You can, however, petition the court to reduce your child support amount if she now has an increase in household income on her end. Alimony disappears when the spouse remarries, but child support goes until the child reaches 18.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 10:44 AM
2

Getting banned there is super-easy. You either promote feminism or get banned. Questioning is not promoting....ergo...banhammer. I made one post in there as well, questioning what the feminist position on the draft is....boom...ban.
/r/MensRights28/06/21 08:12 PM
3

My wife had something similar happen 5 years ago. Turns out, the " gentleman " was a bad guy trying to make a play on her. Luckily, I was 50 feet away to get the " gentleman " away from her.
/r/MensRights26/06/21 06:20 PM
10

Just consider it him aborting his child....
/r/MensRights21/06/21 06:47 PM
11

Sounds like he made his choice...
/r/MensRights21/06/21 06:10 PM
2

Its not just women who look down on blue collar men...its pretty much everyone, except blue collar men.
/r/MensRights16/06/21 10:47 PM
6

This isn't a men's rights issue. Its woke virtuesignaling., at best..normalizing the feminization of men, at worst.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 01:32 PM
2

Its a tough road brother....I get it. I haven't walked that particular dark path, but I know far too many that have or are still walking it. I wish there were magic words to say to get you to understand a different , more positive, perspective. if they exist, I don't know them, so there's no use in bullshitting. For different reasons, I took on helping my brothers as my life passion...in helping them heal, I have been healed myself....the magic of service is astounding. We sure could use your he…
/r/MensRights07/06/21 09:54 PM
2

That's not really my take away....but to each their own. My takeaway isnt a comparison over who feels more hopeless or committed to ending themselves, but that its an indicator that men, in general, understand that they have very very few, if any, resources available to help with depressive spirals, and there are societal forces that preempt them from gaining the help they need ( IE: " man up and deal with it) They simply understand that society at large isn't going to help, and ending it all is…
/r/MensRights07/06/21 06:41 PM
35

Women actually attempt suicide more often than men. Men are just far more successful at it. For women, its more often a cry for help or a form of manipulation....for men, its just an end to their troubles. They know there is little help to find, even if they wanted to....they know that society doesn't actually care about dudes who are damaged or in pain. They feel They are left with the choice to suck it up or check out. Can men cry for help?....sure thing. They soon find out that very few peopl…
/r/MensRights07/06/21 12:13 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter