TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Throne3d Archive

View 0 posts and 21 comments by Throne3d on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

I think it's still not rape, because you changed your mind when you were under the influence, and you were willing at the time. If you're going to go and change your mind and have sex with someone after you get drunk, then you really shouldn't be getting drunk in the first place. Now, I could see that being sexual harassment or something, or coercion or something, as you didn't wish to do it when you were perfectly sober, but then did when you were in a weaker state of mind. She would have also …
/r/MensRights21/05/14 09:39 AM
1

In the British law system, if you intend to cause damage but accidentally cause more damage than intended, you would be guilty of the "more damage" scenario, I believe. There's also a sort of... transfer of intent. If you are in the line at a post office and someone's annoying you, so you try to punch them, then they move out of the way, you end hitting an elderly man behind them, then the elderly man dies... you have committed murder. You had the mens rea to harm someone (I believe a punch to t…
/r/MensRights25/03/14 06:14 PM
2

Yeah, because it was a reckless action. You may not have intended to harm someone, but you intended to perform an action which you should have known was able to harm someone. Then you performed the action. So you had the "mens rea" and the "actus reus" - the intent to perform an action, and the action itself. (Don't know if this is how the American law system works, but I'm pretty sure that's what the British one is...)
/r/MensRights25/03/14 06:09 PM
2

Well if that's the case, there should be "rape" and "premeditated rape"...
/r/MensRights25/03/14 06:07 PM
4

I thought the difference was paedophile and pederast... (with paedophile meaning attraction to children and pederast meaning acting upon it)
/r/MensRights25/03/14 06:03 PM
1

Science, as a general rule of thumb, teaches to not believe things without evidence. The problem you have drawn with my quote (put above for reference) is that, "not believing things without evidence" does not mean "believing things with evidence". The absence of evidence means you should not believe in something. This does not translate to something having evidence deserving being believed. Besides, there's no evidence that a god exists. Sure, you may have evidence which says it's normal to bel…
/r/MensRights07/03/14 09:27 PM
1

Not a difficult choice for me, I stopped being an atheist many years ago by simple common sense and reason, but it can be a difficult process. and: Oh, and if you're not an atheist, have you picked a religion or are you just agnostic... or whatever the theistic, non-specific-religion version is...? I wasn't trying to deflect the conversation... I was responding to something you had said... I don't abuse, mock and ridicule religious beliefs. In my opinion, it is bizarre to believe in a god for wh…
/r/MensRights07/03/14 08:27 PM
1

I... huh? So... in order to remain skeptical and reasonable, you must believe in a higher power for which there is no evidence - the opposite of being skeptical... and therefore, reasonable... What do you mean by "daring God to harm them and their families", by the way? As in... if an atheist goes ahead and says "GOD ISN'T REAL OTHERWISE HE'D SMITE ME DOWN FOR HERESY", they have the same reaction as... a theist saying "God, forgive me for [blah], or else smite me for I don't wish to live in this…
/r/MensRights07/03/14 07:15 PM
1

Oh, okay. You were talking about the major "controversial" atheist figures, like Dawkins. I thought you meant atheists in general, who just don't believe in a god... I personally disagree with those things - religion doesn't cause too many problems, except for fringe groups. However, a few of them do cause... prejudice... which can be bad. But, in my opinion, rape is definitely worse. Bombing civilians is always bad, in my opinion. I mean, bombing extremists who plan on bombing us themselves and…
/r/MensRights07/03/14 05:59 PM
1

The way you phrase your first paragraph makes it sound as though atheism is a movement of like-minded people complaining at the fact that people are really stupid... When said other people are not stupid. That's the equivalent to me saying that Christianity is all about hate speech towards gay people (or at least saying they're not normal and should stop doing anything with each other), and then proceeding to say that everyone who isn't a Christian follows a false idol. I'm pretty sure that ther…
/r/MensRights07/03/14 04:58 PM
1

Huh? People not believing in a god, and a "new" form of this, is becoming not-relevant, ignored by placed which contained their animalistic noises? I think you're generalising a whole group here and describing them as the fringe cases who hate all who are not like them...
/r/MensRights07/03/14 04:38 PM
1

That's not what I was saying - I completely agree that it's sexist, though is likely not going to cause as much uproar as if there were free bus rides for men for a day. But to be honest, the date should've been kinda obvious... It sticks out on the design, and looks kinda date-like...
/r/MensRights06/03/14 07:19 PM
0

I'm sorry... when you say "the atheists", do you just mean really really extreme ones who hate anything religious whatsoever and basically want to burn religious people at the cross (woo, the irony), or do you mean... regular atheists, who just don't believe...? e.e
/r/MensRights06/03/14 07:01 PM
0

Dimanche 9 mars Just wondering, what could that possibly be other than a date? "random 9 days" ? e.e Maybe it just seems so obviously a date because I've done French in the past, but... Most (European) languages have pretty similar styles of writing dates, and the words seem... quite date-like? e.e Also, if it's in celebration of a day: Its to celebrate international womens day. Its like a free meal on mother or fathers day. It should be kinda obvious it's just that day... especially considering…
/r/MensRights06/03/14 06:58 PM
1

The main problem here is that "human life" has different meanings. Life is whatever it is that's different between inorganic and organic matter. It includes growth, reproduction, and a bunch of other things. "Human" would be the DNA, most likely. So "human life" is anything which is alive which has human DNA, except... I don't think people would consider a few cells (I do seriously mean "a few" in this case) to be a human life, and so what's the cutoff between "a bunch of cells" and "a human lif…
/r/MensRights26/01/14 02:21 PM
9

I think /u/BlindPelican was saying that the man has no say over what happens to the child if the man and the woman break up, as the woman is likely to get the parental rights (or whatever it is - custody?).
/r/MensRights26/01/14 02:03 PM
3

But then they're not consenting. If they were perfectly sober, and just lay there, making weird sounds, then it'd be rape, due to a lack of consent. I mean, it's unlikely someone would just lay there, making weird sounds, if sober, but sex should be completely consensual. A lack of a "no" doesn't indicate consent. However, being drunk doesn't indicate a lack of consent, though you probably shouldn't anything if they're completely wasted.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 06:54 PM
2

A) Not /u/marclepinewasright B) Not obvious C) Science is observations and conclusions. Crime statistics are observations, documents involving them include conclusions, therefore crime statistics are part of science, now sh. D) I have no idea what /pol/ is E) screen macros? A macro is some sort of repetitive action, or something large, no? And a screen... I assume you mean monitor. What the heck is a screen macro? F) SJW... I forget what that means. Something-something warrior, is it? G) "claim …
/r/MensRights09/01/14 10:02 PM
3

The fuq? How exactly am I another account? No. I don't want to say it's biological. I'm not a white, nor black, nor any other race, supremacist. I want people to be treated equally, and you know what? I was replying to your comment out of context. Crime statistics are from science, and criminology is a science of itself. I'm not saying people are biologically predisposed to commit certain crimes, but ... People are likely socially predisposed to do it. "They are an observation in a vacuum." - Hu…
/r/MensRights09/01/14 09:42 PM
4

Yuh. They are. Science (noun): the intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behaviour of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment. Crime statistics have been created via studies of the behaviour of the physical and natural world (uh... we're natural (sorta, depending on which definition you use) too), through observation. Experiments? Well, we can observe "experiments" which have happened (e.g. have a certain number of pe…
/r/MensRights09/01/14 09:30 PM
0

Or what other awful traumas may have happened. I don't think it mentions any, but it's possible he had some sort of prior mental problem. Could be due to childhood abuse, or something else. Or it could just be that he was... put through enough to want to kill himself and his child. I really don't see why you'd do it, though. Even with a terrible divorce, and the chance of losing your kid... You still have life. Surely you'd be able to see your kid some time, and even though it's not as much as y…
/r/MensRights26/12/13 12:44 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter