TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ThrowAway233223 Archive

View 0 posts and 22 comments by ThrowAway233223 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
17

It appears the girl may further face expulsion from the middle school. So. according to the article, the title is wrong. She is currently only suspended while they investigate and she may be expelled dependents on the results of the investigation. She is not currently expelled.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/10/24 12:22 PM
1

In the strict sense of the word, no. Pedophilia refers to attraction toward prepubescent children. For how the term tends to be used in informal conversation, yes.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/02/22 10:15 PM
2

They do have a higher tendency to use the correct term when its female-on-female though. I'm surprised they didn't here. Although, it is part of a quote and they do say 'sex abuse' in the first paragraph.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/21 11:46 PM
1

Yep. Meant to include that in penetration of any kind but failed to clarify.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/04/21 12:55 AM
4

Agreed, I think it should just be penetration of any kind. Doesn't matter if it is by penis, fingers, or toy(s).
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/21 11:56 PM
55

Interestingly, there seems to be a trend of outlets suddenly using the proper terminology when the victim is female as well. Female teacher sleeps with a male student: "relations", "an affair", "slept with", etc. Female teacher sleeps with a female student: "rape", "coerced", "sexually assaulted", etc. You'll also see more negative language targeted at the rapist in the latter case as well.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/21 11:52 PM
10

There is still sexual assault, which is a much broader term, yet too many media outlets dance around using that term as well in female-on-male cases.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/21 11:45 PM
14

Where? You're not talking about this, are you? The police report said: “Hernandez was angry at the fact that [the victim] did not want to have sex and began attacking him, striking him in the face and ripping his shirt.” Because if so, that's not what is going on here. When you alter someone's quoted statement (which may be done to offer greater clarity), you have to indicate what was altered or else you are misquoting them. This is done by placing the altered portion within brackets. So in this…
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/21 11:43 PM
2

Your right, that is exactly what this subreddit I'd about. What is your point? That is exactly what my comment is in support of. It doesn't say anything about this sub being a retaliation against the late feminist movement or about tipping the scales in favor of men. It simply say that it is for men's rights and the violation of those rights. Fixing those issues (and issues experienced by women) would set bother genders equal to each other (with the exception of aspects that are dictated by biol…
/r/MensRights25/02/17 03:18 PM
3

To append "especially boy victims," instead of leaving it at "to seek justice for all victims" suggest a bias in favor of male victims. I agree that male victims are far too often ignored or dismissed and that the justice system does need to make changes to ensure that they are addressing all sexual crimes equally and without regard toward gender; however doing so wouldn't make the male victims especially taken care of or focused on. It would just make them no longer ignored or dismissed. The se…
/r/MensRights24/02/17 10:41 PM
1

Oh no, I'm not suggesting that this one post is reflective of the entire sub. My critique is against only this one post. I've seen many people advocate for actual gender equality (and not pseudo-retaliatory gender bais) in both post and comments though out this sub.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 10:11 PM
18

especially boy victims. This is the exact same gender bias that many members of this sub attack some members of the feminist movement (and general public) for having. I understand that, being a Men's Right subreddit, there is naturally a focus on males, but this is suppose to be a sub advocating for the awareness of and elimination of the discrimination, bias, and general inequilities experienced by men. It is hypocritical to criticize the hyper-focus on female rape victims and ignoring of male …
/r/MensRights24/02/17 07:12 PM
3

Saying "I bet his dick was hard" is a very distasteful, perverted comment that possibly suggest that he wanted or was asking for it. It would be just as distasteful, and would probably get a bigger reaction, if it were a girl being molested by a guy and someone said "I bet her pussy was wet."
/r/MensRights20/06/13 02:26 AM
6

So if a 12 year old girl were smiling while a man of similar age to this woman were having sex with them on a bus you would be perfectly fine with it? You would still say "I can't help but think that if the girl hasn't been all smiling and stuff, and had reacted negatively to what he was doing, that he might have backed off?" Also, how capable is the average 12 year old of contemplating the exact potential rambifications of having sex? Think about those questions a bit and you will either come t…
/r/MensRights20/06/13 02:15 AM
0

No problem. Also, wow. I can't remember the last time I saw the word edification used. I actually stared at it for a moment wondering if it was actually a word until I remembered it. So thank you for the refresher.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 07:39 PM
2

Statue of Limitations? It is the time period in which a person must be accused of a crime before they can no longer be accused for it. Simply put, you can't accuse someone of theft 20 years after they robbed you. This is because it makes the court proceeding exceedingly difficult due to how much time has past and can make it nearly impossible to either defend oneself or prosecute the accused depending on the circumstances. This can lead to very bad circumstances so a limitation on how long you c…
/r/MensRights28/12/12 06:28 PM
-1

call people 'faggots' "No-one should have identifying information posted on the internet without their consent" could have SRS-ers posting as replies to the r/SRS thread, "Obviously the same logic doesn't apply when the information identifies women, since reddit doesn't think they're people", an image macro of a man in a smoking jacket saying, "Consent... is for paedophiles" specifically do not allow links from various subs reject r/MR as a legitimate movement in gender-politics Any attempt to a…
/r/MensRights15/10/12 04:00 AM
-2

That was not made evident in FlamingBearAttack's post. However, I think you will notice that I said "debate on whether to keep SRS around." Therefore, if there were no evidence and the act was not committed, then there is no problem. I never said I agreed with banning SRS. I stated that there should be a healthy, constructive debate.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 03:42 AM
2

If you would have it removed because it offends you, then are you really that much different than them who probably want this subreddit removed because it offends them. Freedom of speech is something that we all have, even those of us that we would rather wish didn't.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 12:41 AM
-6

Thank you for your reply. I am not sure if it was intended or not, although I am guessing it is, but they sound as if they are a very contradicting and hypocritical group. I do see them sticking to their own subreddit to talk trash as being a good thing though. It keeps the trash contained. While I am quite apprehensive and weary of /r/creepshots for its questionable content, I feel that posting a persons personal information over a matter that is still under debate to cross the line. While the …
/r/MensRights15/10/12 12:40 AM
1

Ah, thank you. I am familiar with ShitRedditSays but not as familiar with the controversy concerning them. I think part of the confusion I experience here is the fact that the abbreviation, and sometime the link /r/SRS, are being used which is actually a completely different subreddit that apparently concerns gender reassignment surgery. Well from your description, I do agree that there should be a debate on whether to keep SRS around if this is what their subreddit has become. I think it is fin…
/r/MensRights15/10/12 12:24 AM
32

I have heard a lot of mention of SRS but have no idea what it is. I don't typically see many post from this subreddit either. Would someone be so kind as to inform me of what SRS is and why some wish to ban it?
/r/MensRights14/10/12 09:48 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter