TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ThrowAway237s Archive

View 1 post and 15 comments by ThrowAway237s on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
47

Social IssuesThrowAway237s/r/MensRights08/06/25 07:12 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
15

Context: They disabled comments around early 2021. They already mass-deleted comments towards late 2020. 427 thousand comments in November 2020, down from 448 thousand in July 2020. This archive is from July 2020, prior to the purge.
/r/MensRights08/06/25 07:14 AM
1

Comment archive with almost half a million comments.
/r/MensRights30/05/25 10:30 PM
1

Since July 2013, the Wayback Machine has been unable to archive YouTube comments due to YouTube changing how they were loaded. But you're in luck! Someone manually uploaded the comments here: https://archive.org/details/youtube-koPmuEyP3a0-comments
/r/MensRights30/05/25 10:30 PM
2

Don't worry. Here is a copy: FGM (Female Genital Mutilation) is horrifying and quite rightly outlawed. The fight to stop it goes on. Male circumcision, on the other hand, is standard practice. Unless there is an actual medical reason for it, which is rarely the case, it should not happen. It’s outdated, abusive and barbaric. If you are a circumcised man, chances are you probably don’t mind very much because maybe you were too young to remember it happening and you absorbed the trauma. It is so n…
/r/MensRights28/05/21 07:36 PM
2

But at least she would presumably be unable to cause as much damage there.
/r/MensRights10/04/21 02:49 PM
8

90% males Among them is circumcision shill James Heilman (Shillman).
/r/MensRights08/04/21 11:03 PM
7

But they can still accuse you of proxy-editing on behalf of a blocked user.
/r/MensRights08/04/21 09:47 PM
6

They might as well accuse you of being editing on behalf of a blocked individual, and there is no way to defend yourself. They have such policies that exist to shut down criticism, as they make no sense otherwise: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Meatpuppetry https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BANREVERT https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:G5
/r/MensRights08/04/21 08:14 PM
12

You have a snowball's chance in hell editing against circumcision on Wikipedia, because pro-circumcision shill administrator James Heilman, who owns the medical section, takes every anti-circumcision editor to the drama noticeboard, and tries to get them punished. He has been doing so for many years. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/k0h94i/wikipedia_procircumcision_censorship/gtr7hnn/.compact And don't even bother accusing them of cabalism. They are armed with mockery pages. CC: /u/S…
/r/MensRights08/04/21 07:56 PM
39

Don't forget circumcision. Wikipedia's medical section also has been compromised. Administrator Doc James is desperately battling every editor who dares to write about the hazardous effects on sexual function.
/r/MensRights08/04/21 07:52 PM
3

Or deportation to Afghanistan.
/r/MensRights08/04/21 07:48 PM
2

Sorry for belated comment. If you thought Waskett did all this damage on Wikipedia alone, you'd be wrong. Had anyone been editing against circumcision back then, he would have been stopped. Here's why: Wikipedia's medical division has been compromised by pro-circumcision shill administrator James Heilman, who aggressively takes all anti-circumcision editors to their drama noticeboard, in a desparate attempt to boot them off the platform. Due to this selection (Sanger's law), editors who remain a…
/r/MensRights08/04/21 12:54 AM
1

Do not trust Wikipedia on circumcision. Its medical division has been compromised by pro-circumcision shill administrator James Heilman, who immediately takes all anti-circumcision editors to their drama noticeboard, in a desparate attempt to boot them off the platform. Doc James claims "Wikipedia is no advocacy platform" while doing pro-circumcision advocacy himself. Don't get fooled. Circumcision is a hazardous medical scam.
/r/MensRights08/04/21 12:30 AM
2

On Wikipedia, there are administrators called Doc James and Swarm, who sanction users for sharing anything critical of circumcision, and even occasionally accuse them of circumventing blocks (sock puppeteering). The former is member of the Wikimedia Foundation's board of trustees, i.e. one level below Jimmy Wales! Conclusion: Do not trust anything on circumcision on Wikipedia. CC: @Ferretninja007 (side note: Ferret is a Wikipedia administrator's name too, but he appears nit to be involved in thi…
/r/MensRights09/10/20 03:40 PM
1

Larry's site appears down at the moment (for the record).
/r/MensRights28/09/20 09:19 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter