TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ThrowAway640KB Archive

View 11 posts and 470 comments by ThrowAway640KB on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
2185

False AccusationThrowAway640KB/r/MensRights26/05/22 07:47 PM
625

ProgressThrowAway640KB/r/MensRights14/06/23 05:52 PM
447

ThrowAway640KB/r/PussyPass07/04/20 11:56 PM
127

Social IssuesThrowAway640KB/r/MensRights04/07/23 06:43 AM
84

HealthThrowAway640KB/r/MensRights13/07/23 06:47 PM
39

ProgressThrowAway640KB/r/MensRights14/07/23 05:03 PM
30

FeminismThrowAway640KB/r/MensRights30/08/22 12:18 AM
26

Legal RightsThrowAway640KB/r/MensRights17/06/22 04:38 AM
16

ThrowAway640KB/r/PussyPass18/11/20 07:57 PM
5

DiscriminationThrowAway640KB/r/MensRights23/09/22 11:59 PM
1

Social IssuesThrowAway640KB/r/MensRights25/01/23 08:10 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
62

You economically and educationally disenfranchise an entire generation of men, tell them that they are the source of all of society’s problems, that they are just rapists-in-training and default predators, that they have no right to be involved in their children’s lives if the mother objects, and that they must still meet all of society’s expectations of men while women are completely absolved of all of theirs, and just watch how men start walking away from the table. Good. Maybe that pendulum n…
/r/MensRights09/04/24 06:46 AM
5

Female brain perceives male homosexuality as misogyny I have legit seen this IRL.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/04/24 10:10 PM
2

And I am saying we need to be formless and faceless, to provide them absolutely nothing to grasp or hold up as evidence of being attacked. If we do anything, it must be the absence of activity, not the presence of it. That’s why MGTOW is so effective - we simply walk away, giving them absolutely nothing to use. Giving them impotent rage and nothing to push back against is our best possible strategy.
/r/MensRights09/01/24 04:20 AM
2

So let’s give them a war. War gives them exactly what they want: themselves as a clearly-defined, obvious-as-hell victim. War gives them the ability to hold men up as “aggressors” to be defeated by whatever means possible, including incarceration and death. It gives them power to do even more damage.
/r/MensRights09/01/24 12:01 AM
3

more men at the bottom with no one is inevitable. Which is why we need to have outreach, to show them a different path out of inceldom - that it is possible to go your own way, abandon any expectation of marriage and children, and have a decently happy life. Sure, you’re unlikely to be able to swing genetic progeny without a wife, surrogacy is a crapshoot, and even adoption is hellish for single men, but there are other options for leaving a legacy than just children.
/r/MensRights08/01/24 11:57 PM
1

Knew a similar situation, only involving student debt (which cannot be discharged in bankruptcy, at least in the States) and a complete breakdown due to various psych issues. The guy had to drop out of uni, so he had nothing to use in a job. Ended up becoming homeless before anything happened to his debts, so he had no knowledge of what was happening. Turns out the guy became a victim of identity theft, but because the perp was an illegal alien, the perp tried to live under the radar as best as …
/r/MensRights29/12/23 07:27 AM
2

Not a mod here, but it is in the rules. I wouldn’t want to risk a ban for that. While titles cannot be edited, I think links can. Next time, try using an image hosting service like Imgur or (better yet!) PostImages, and see if you can edit the link to point to an updated image. Unfortunately, this image is Reddit-hosted, so you’re SOL here. Your only option is a repost.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/12/23 02:01 AM
3

Please be careful with this screenshot, as this violates Rule № 2 in terms of the Reddit user that was screenshotted. It made the user trivially easy to find.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/12/23 01:24 AM
5

no one registers a female SO punching their male partner as abuse. In many jurisdictions, the software that the police use is hard coded to have the perp as male and the victim as female. And the cop can be pulled onto the carpet and disciplined by their superiors for putting the wrong people into the wrong gender category. This cascades down into the legal system, where if such a categorization of male-as-victim is let to slide by LEO admins, the legal system itself will see this case thrown ou…
/r/MensRights23/12/23 08:01 PM
0

Women are the majority of the initiators of DV against men. To a consistently average rate of about 70%. That’s almost three-quarters of non-reciprocal physically violent domestic violence. And yet, we have the perniciously misandric and duplicitous Duluth Model, which frames ALL Domestic Violence as men beating up women.
/r/MensRights23/12/23 07:54 PM
6

…The f**k??
/r/MensRights21/12/23 05:26 AM
2

There are vanishingly few female feminists in foxholes. This is also why feminists are also the ones who push back so hard on expanding the draft to include women. They don’t want equality. They never did. They just want all the benefits of special rights with none of the trade-offs.
/r/MensRights04/12/23 01:07 AM
6

We have heard many women claim that they support men’s rights. More often than not, that “support” extends only so far as it also benefits them. Once true equality begins to bite, they back off and refuse to support true equality. You want to be taken seriously? Put your money where your mouth is. As in, walk the walk, don’t talk the talk. Let your actions speak for themselves.
/r/MensRights03/12/23 05:39 AM
11

When 72-74% of all non-reciprocal domestic violence (only one partner is physically violent) involves women beating up men, any parity in arresting domestic violence abusers is greatly appreciated.
/r/MensRights24/11/23 07:17 AM
2

Please don’t use AMP links, they are damaging to the web. Please consider adding Redirect AMP to HTML to your browser (Chrome, Firefox) to avoid running into AMP content in the future.
/r/MensRights31/10/23 06:51 AM
2

Once you realize that the vast majority of women are going to be brainwashed by this, it jut gets easier to write them all off and make the decision to go your own way. Don’t get me wrong, good women still exist out there. But you and most every other decent guy out there is trying to find her, and you actually finding her first - and recognizing her for who she is - needs about as much luck as winning the powerball ten times in a row. Play with women, have fun with women, but realize that she w…
/r/MensRights27/10/23 05:46 AM
6

Wait until they find out that women rape men as often as men rape women. And now the real surprise: when asked about experiences in the last 12 months, men reported being “made to penetrate”—either by physical force or due to intoxication—at virtually the same rates as women reported rape (both 1.1 percent in 2010, and 1.7 and 1.6 respectively in 2011). In other words, if being made to penetrate someone was counted as rape—and why shouldn’t it be?—then the headlines could have focused on a truly…
/r/MensRights24/10/23 12:14 AM
17

Great. More "don't rape courses" for men. The irony being, women rape men as frequently as men rape women: And now the real surprise: when asked about experiences in the last 12 months, men reported being “made to penetrate”—either by physical force or due to intoxication—at virtually the same rates as women reported rape (both 1.1 percent in 2010, and 1.7 and 1.6 respectively in 2011). In other words, if being made to penetrate someone was counted as rape—and why shouldn’t it be?—then the headl…
/r/MensRights05/10/23 02:42 AM
8

it's a process that begins with deprogramming them Feminist and Tradcon nonsense. Absolutely agreed. While going full-throttle tradcon is going to be one of the easiest ways to wrap a guy around her little finger, that can only be safely done from a position of confidence, self-determination, and self-actualization. From learning all the things that you pointed out above. And then it becomes a gross manipulation of the man all over again, à la Esther Vilar. I find it pretty damned misogynistic. …
/r/MensRights05/10/23 02:37 AM
-2

That applies to the captain save a ho’s and to the knights in shining armor. The smart ones will learn their mistake. The intelligent ones are like you.
/r/MensRights05/10/23 02:28 AM
23

We'll end up like South Korea and Japan. So long as men can live healthy, happy, and fulfilling lives on their own, that shouldn’t be a problem. The main difference between herbivore men and MGTOW is that the latter doesn’t shut itself in, it just refuses to give AF about what society thinks of it. You can very much be a social butterfly as a MGTOW, just as much as you can be a shut-in. You just are internally motivated, defining your own happiness and purpose in life, instead of letting someone…
/r/MensRights05/10/23 02:26 AM
133

The average 40yo man will have had just two sexual partners from LTR’s (so prostitutes and one-night-stands don’t count). Consider that: only two. The average 40yo woman will have had 12 sexual partners from LTR’s. Make of that what you will, but the Pareto Principle is very much alive for men.
/r/MensRights04/10/23 07:19 AM
7

These young men are lonely, and it is having real consequences. They are choosing AI girlfriends over real women, meaning they don’t have relationships with real women, don’t marry them and then don’t have and raise babies with them. When most women want absolutely nothing to do with the lower-80% of men, I’d say that virtual girlfriends are the humane and caring way of giving these neglected and ignored men something they would normally not get anywhere else - an emotionally positive and constr…
/r/MensRights02/10/23 05:00 AM
12

Because a fair bit of men’s mental health issues is directly caused by women’s expectations. Most of the rest are simple biochemical imbalances.
/r/MensRights02/10/23 04:53 AM
3

aggressively leaving someone alone is hateful now. When that “someone” is a woman looking for a payday, it’s misogyny.
/r/MensRights24/09/23 07:40 AM
1

a cult Nice echo.
/r/MensRights08/09/23 10:47 PM
4

The CDC discovered this almost a decade ago ago: that women rape men as frequently as men rape women. And now the real surprise: when asked about experiences in the last 12 months, men reported being “made to penetrate”—either by physical force or due to intoxication—at virtually the same rates as women reported rape (both 1.1 percent in 2010, and 1.7 and 1.6 respectively in 2011). In other words, if being made to penetrate someone was counted as rape—and why shouldn’t it be?—then the headlines …
/r/MensRights31/07/23 06:46 AM
10

A problem three decades in the making, To date, all 70 people who have provided statements to police have been male It also states that the province knew shortly after it hired the swim instructor that he was "sexually inappropriate with male youth" but did not take appropriate steps to address the behaviour. But at least the victims are not being swept under the rug purely for the crime of having been born male. Still -- possibly up to 400 or more men, victimized by a callous system that put th…
/r/MensRights14/07/23 05:06 PM
8

Something like 58% of misogyny online comes from other women. So of course it is systemic. Just not from men.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 05:16 AM
69

Imagine if they conscripted women in the same manner. Just imagine.
/r/MensRights10/07/23 03:16 AM
2

The same feminists that say they're fighting for sexual freedom, now are shaming men for "HaViNg ThE aUdAcItY" to look at a woman sexually. Then go onto their Instagrams, and it’s filled with thirst traps of them showing off their sexuality. They want to be noticed -- just very specific men, and not you.
/r/MensRights08/07/23 12:16 AM
3

If women with autism became men with autism for a week, they would legit become suicidal Dude, there was a woman who decided to fake being a man for 18 months, and the experience triggered an unstoppable spiral into mental illness and eventual suicide. That’s just being a man, much less being a male autist, and it utterly destroyed her in the end. Her experiences have been extensively confirmed by the tens of thousands of F-to-M transitions that have taken place in the last several decades. And …
/r/MensRights08/07/23 12:03 AM
2

But if you want to date agin…You’re gonna go through absolute hell in the current dating world. It’s a shitshow As a neuroatypcial, I have an abysmally low tolerance for bullshit. I am not the kind of person to do anything to make a problem go away - I am more likely to double-down on that problem in a fit of pique and to experience the satisfaction for having defeated it - but when it comes to other people I would rather just avoid those who aren’t going to meet those same standards that I hold…
/r/MensRights07/07/23 08:33 PM
2

But no one showed them the love they needed first. Very well said. Which is why we need to teach these young men how to be intrinsically motivated, how to find peace and contentment within themselves, how to build strong bonds of friendship with other men, and how to go their own way. We need to show them how to live life on their own terms, and to not get hung up on the sharp hooks of female expectations. Essentially, we need to teach these men how to love themselves, especially when there is n…
/r/MensRights07/07/23 07:09 PM
2

For talking about how autistic women are treatrd better than autistic men Diagnosis isn’t up to the same snuff as for men, because women are affected far less than men (to the point where a proportion of society thinks that women can’t even be autistic in the first place), but once diagnosis happens they do see far more doors open for them than guys, for sure. Society practically falls all over itself to accommodate them. Source: have Asperger’s myself, reclassified these days as high-functionin…
/r/MensRights07/07/23 06:40 PM
3

I just don't want to put myself in a position where I can get hurt again. That is entirely your right. You don’t deserve anything to anyone, not even that explanation. You want to be single? Good for you. At least you know what you want out of life. Remember: while it’s absolutely true what the female supremacists say, in that men deserve nothing from women, the flip side is also true in that women deserve nothing from men. Any road which travels in only one direction is bigoted at its foundatio…
/r/MensRights07/07/23 06:33 PM
6

There comes a point where all that shit with women isn’t worth it I am married precisely because I have put down boundaries that I won’t accept anything crossing. She knows this, and respects those boundaries. There is a lot of trust there, based off of established history. But if I got widowed and had to start over? Hell no. I got stupidly lucky with the woman I am currently with, no way in hell will I want to slog through the sewers again just to find another winning lottery ticket. I’m done w…
/r/MensRights07/07/23 06:29 PM
3

Because I disagreed with a female supremacist, and countered her feelings with facts. Happens all the time. They literally have nothing else in their toolkit to work with, other than ad hominem attacks and public censure.
/r/MensRights07/07/23 06:24 PM
4

Any ideology that is based on feelings and opinion instead of facts and evidence is destined to end up like this. Female supremacism is just another ideology destined to go out in a blaze of… something… as it discovers it is toxic, damaging, without a foundation to stand upon, and ultimately irrelevant.
/r/MensRights04/07/23 06:54 AM
50

Personally, I feel dowries are stupid. Especially in the age of legal divorce. It’s probably not the groom who is objecting, but the groom’s parents. Because the dowry is paid out to the groom’s family, not the groom specifically. And I’m betting that it’s the groom’s mother who reinforces the dowry requirement.
/r/MensRights04/07/23 06:43 AM
146

Smart men learn from their mistakes. The truly intelligent men learn from other men’s mistakes. The latter is why we have men going their own way.
/r/MensRights04/07/23 04:29 AM
3

women are entitled to everything men have. Men are entitled to nothing that women have. This even comes over from the old Boomer saying, “What’s his is hers, and what’s hers is hers.” This is not a new attitude. It’s just reached new heights of toxicity, breadth of reach, and societal acceptance on the part of women.
/r/MensRights29/06/23 08:38 PM
2

Women who are standoffish or slow to respond, then become angry when you construe this as a lack of interest and stop reaching out. JFC women, we have been taught for the last few decades that no means no. If you are not interested, we are not going to paint ourselves as a sexual predator just to juice your ego. We are going to take your disinterest at face value, and move on. I'm negotiable on some of these, but it requires a bond of trust. Which takes time, and isn’t something that can be buil…
/r/MensRights29/06/23 08:34 PM
89

Of course. That’s weasel language, for sure. But the entire purpose of the internal post is hella encouraging - most companies wouldn’t even consider it to be a problem worth considering, even with a DEI council.
/r/MensRights14/06/23 09:37 PM
4

Thank you. This is very important.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/06/23 08:23 PM
1

Because in order to effect functional unity and peace, structural differences and inequalities need to be eliminated or severely limited. And the Parasite Class relies entirely on those differences and inequalities to embiggen their already obscene amounts of wealth and power on the backs of the common man.
/r/MensRights07/06/23 07:35 PM
3

I feel like if it were a man wrecking his cheating spouse's things, he would be seen as abusive. But women are never held accountable for that sort of stuff and it really concerns me. If you hold any woman accountable for her own actions and decisions, you are immediately labelled a “misogynist” and an “іnᴄel”. And the worst part is, it’s mostly women who are infantilizing women by absolving them of responsibility.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/05/23 05:55 PM
19

This. I am an egalitarianist, which by default makes me an antifeminist, due to my opposition to gender supremacy in any form.
/r/MensRights12/05/23 11:27 PM
3

Why not both? Honestly. You’re right, I’m right, we’re both right without being in conflict with each other!
/r/MensRights12/05/23 10:18 PM
2

Just a friendly reminder that, despite what the MSM and society tries to brainwash you with, women rape men as frequently as men rape women. Any “anti-rape” training that doesn’t target women in equal measure to men is fundamentally bigoted and misandric.
/r/MensRights12/05/23 06:54 PM
7

at the age of 37, she was accused of unwanted sex with Jimmy Bennet, a 17-year old male actor And yet, they scream with flying spittle about how older men are “predators” when they date much younger women. Typical hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights12/05/23 01:52 PM
21

Where is the education of young women to not rape? After all, women rape men as frequently as men rape women.
/r/MensRights12/05/23 06:41 AM
18

For every man dating a much younger woman, there is a much younger woman exercising her very adult independence and choosing to be with an older man. You cannot shame men for dating younger without also critically and misogynistically infantilizing women.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 03:29 PM
20

Holy shit, this is a monstrously bigoted development. Single Scottish men really need to be taught the Pence Rule. Or that Going Their Own Way is a viable and respectable option.
/r/MensRights27/04/23 03:22 PM
1

I like to say, Feminists always say that women don’t owe men anything. And I fully agree. Women don’t owe men a single damn thing. And because equality is a two-way street, that also means that men don’t owe women a single damn thing as well. Let’s just say I have received incoherent rage and accusations of misogyny from that little phrase.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 04:06 AM
9

fact is the person on the side of the road with their hood up might be broken down, might be looking to carjack you. The crying woman who asks to borrow your cellphone might steal it. I will have absolutely no fear of stopping to help a man. Mainly because it is vanishingly unlikely that they are intentionally up to shit, because vanishingly few people would ever stop to help a man in trouble. I would never stop to help a woman. Not without my wife present, and in our vehicle which has a dash ca…
/r/MensRights21/04/23 03:37 AM
3

I still don't know if I should have offered her a lift or not. You did 100% the SMART THING. You simply cannot tell which person will be safe, and which one will be that poisoned M&M in that bowl full of safe ones. Better to prioritize your own legal safety, economic potential, and ability to earn a living. That girl will be completely safe, even if she ends up getting sore feet.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 03:33 AM
5

They're dealing with an unexploded bomb of a person. Someone who can scream lies of sexual assault, or just straight up attack them, and anything they do to protect themselves will call down violence from the state and others around them, and potentially get them stuck inside a cage for decades. LOUDER for the female supremacists in the room. Until this issue gets de-fanged, the walking-on-eggshells will continue for any currently-existing generations of men. Only men who have grown up in the co…
/r/MensRights12/04/23 03:06 AM
9

And they're engaging in serious Libel and Slander, a considerable legal violation. Any good lawyer would have a field day with that one. Especially if you sued for damages… like, “go after everyone who commented negatively on me; get me $1k per person, anything after that is yours.” - a simplified version, but very juicy for any lawyer that specializes in libel/slander. Lots of people who do lie will sooner pay out than risk going to trial. The downside is that you may have to prove a negative, …
/r/MensRights10/04/23 05:08 PM
5

I actually read the USAF report that pinned it at 60% demonstrably false accusations, with another 20-30% (IIRC) as “indeterminate”. Because military police do not fuck around, they are deadly serious about their investigations. Plus, in military installations the surveillance is everywhere. Lots of opportunities for facts to be recorded in ways that avoid hearsay.
/r/MensRights10/04/23 04:02 PM
7

What do you think of women in the Church? IME/FWIHS, some of the freakiest and fastest-to-fuck single women under 40 are church-going women whom you would think were chaste virgins who had never so much as even kissed a non-relative. They are church going for the veneer of respectability and deniability. After all, if you exposed their true behaviour they would have half a congregation’s worth of ѕіmpѕ willing to defend m’lady’s honour, and another half a congregation’s worth of allies to social…
/r/TheRedPill20/03/23 03:06 AM
3

I usually don’t reach for absolutes, and in this regard I would only agree with you in terms of generalities. Is the average man likely to ever stumble across a “good woman” who would never put him into a second-class-citizen position? Very unlikely, unless he was evaluating a woman per day for decades. And in a way that he’ll recognize, without having spent a decent amount of time (much more than a day) with her? Even less likely. And with attraction running in both directions? A vanishingly ti…
/r/TheRedPill19/03/23 02:17 AM
44

I'll marry That would be your big mistake. Sure, marriageable women still exist; they are out there to be found. And you could also win the Powerball ten times in a row. But both are equally likely to occur. I met my wife back in the 90s, and even then, good women were damn hard to find. These days? They are pretty much an extinct species, statistically speaking. Even up in Canada, shit’s getting really, really bad: 57% of women - including 70% of those 18 to 24 - identify as feminists, the high…
/r/TheRedPill19/03/23 12:38 AM
5

Ok, but women get raped more. No, no they don’t: And now the real surprise: when asked about experiences in the last 12 months, men reported being “made to penetrate”—either by physical force or due to intoxication—at virtually the same rates as women reported rape (both 1.1 percent in 2010, and 1.7 and 1.6 respectively in 2011). In other words, if being made to penetrate someone was counted as rape—and why shouldn’t it be?—then the headlines could have focused on a truly sensational CDC finding…
/r/MensRights18/03/23 07:12 PM
1

Resumes with photos are a great way to introduce biases and bigotry. I know several companies that explicitly bin applications with photos as lawsuits could result.
/r/MensRights06/03/23 09:40 PM
1

I have a name that is gendered, but so unusual in North America (outside of Quebec) that not many people recognize the difference between the male and female variants. In my industry (IT), I typically get about 5-10 times the number of initial job-submission replies from companies than anyone else that I know of in my skills cohort. Now, first interviews - when they happen - are usually fun. Because I frequently see the surprise in the interviewer’s face when I walk in. And a quick scan of my CV…
/r/MensRights06/03/23 09:38 PM
1

There are plenty of PDFs floating about the Internet. Shame, though, that the physical book is so long out of print and very difficult to obtain.
/r/MensRights06/03/23 06:44 AM
0

Full blown democratic socialist. About as blue as they get without dropping into the same strength of bigotry as one sees on the other end of the political horseshoe with the alt-right.
/r/MensRights28/02/23 04:04 AM
12

TL;DR: Telegony is when a female’s offspring exhibit a small number of genetic/heritable traits not from the male that sired them, but from her sexual partners prior to the current male. It’s why breeders don’t care who their male studs mate with, but if a female purebred animal mates with anything other than another purebred male of the same breed, she becomes permanently tarnished and loses her purebred status. She can never again produce offspring that can be officially “papered”, even if no …
/r/MensRights26/02/23 03:31 AM
2

I have a name that is gendered, but so unusual in North America (outside of Quebec) that not many people recognize the difference between the male and female variants. In my industry (IT), I typically get about 5-10 times the number of job-submission replies from companies than anyone else that I know of in my skills cohort. Now, first interviews - when they happen - are usually fun. Because I frequently see the surprise in the interviewer’s face when I walk in. And a quick scan of my CV, follow…
/r/MensRights26/02/23 03:21 AM
5

Telegony is a thing. It has now been confirmed to exist in mammals, via small, fast-reproducing, short-lifespan mice. It’s only a matter of time until the research moves on to larger, longer-lifespan, and slower-reproducing mammals. I predict the next step will be to confirm its existence in pets and livestock, where those entire industries (and pedigrees) have worked for centuries under the assumption that Telegony is real. Now granted, unlike mice this will take a lot longer due to the longer …
/r/MensRights26/02/23 02:55 AM
20

Seriously, looking at this thread the lack of empathy towards men is crazy. Look at threads talking about male depression and suicide statistics, most of the comments will blame the way men are currently living, and toxic masculinity. Ok, so its the fault of men that they're depressed. Now look at this thread, men are also at fault for women's high inclination towards suicide. Maybe painting an entire sex as a boogeyman doesn't help with this. Well, colour me surprised: it’s been deleted by the …
/r/MensRights14/02/23 08:25 PM
3

a number of evolutionary psychology books by Martie haselton. Do you have a list of titles to work off of? Just hit up Amazon, and there ain’t nothing except for one book called Hormonal. Which is about “the intelligence of hormones”.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 07:18 PM
-2

Just like all the extreme woke stuff with racial issues and gay issues is creating more racism and homophobia than ever. No, no it isn’t. It’s just triggering the real snowflakes, which induces them to speak up. These bigots have always been there, it’s just that society used to have these unspoken rules of bigotry that spoke for them. Still does, actually, but now that this regressive veneer is being significantly eroded and dissolved, these bigots are like diseased and decaying flesh that has …
/r/MensRights09/02/23 06:00 PM
1

You challenged her position in the wrong manner - you needed to demonstrably prove that her initial premise was wrong, and that women rape men as frequently as men rape women: And now the real surprise: when asked about experiences in the last 12 months, men reported being “made to penetrate”—either by physical force or due to intoxication—at virtually the same rates as women reported rape (both 1.1 percent in 2010, and 1.7 and 1.6 respectively in 2011). In other words, if being made to penetrat…
/r/MensRights09/02/23 04:06 PM
15

It won’t be long until a social media influencer gets crushed by a heavy weight on livestream because the men surrounding her will be too scared to offer help for fear of being labelled predators. Women made that bed. They should learn how to sleep in it.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 08:24 AM
14

Someone does come but people have pointed out due to women shaming men for even glancing at them now no one will go help anyone. Not my monkeys, not my circus. This is also why - even though I am Canadian certified level 2 first aid - I will not assist any woman in medical distress without guaranteed witnesses or video evidence. I have no intention of losing my own life to incarceration and a false criminal record in order to save the ungrateful and malicious.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 08:20 AM
27

“These very adult women have no agency! They’re children who must be protected!” - 2X
/r/PussyPass08/02/23 06:12 AM
4

Flip the terms. Is it misogynistic? Then the original is misandric. If you flip the terms/genders and it isn’t either misandric or misogynistic, then it truly is neutral.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 08:10 AM
1

Women don’t want to run in the race. They never have. They just want to wait at the finish line and f**k the winners.
/r/MensRights06/02/23 05:19 PM
5

And this is touted as a “success”, and men’s failure to keep pace is ignored and forgotten, because men don’t matter. Typical bigotry.
/r/PussyPass06/02/23 05:15 PM
7

It’s not that men avoid drama, there is a decent subset who don’t. I have seen plenty of men create drama, and relish it. It’s just that mature men will bitch-slap the male drama queens upside the back of the head and tell them to grow up. Because that’s where all drama comes from -- immaturity and child-like narcissism. Some men just never “grow up” in this regard, and an all-male workplace will (generally) socially discriminate against them.
/r/MensRights02/02/23 06:47 PM
10

If you’ve ever read Y:The Last Man, the women would be working overtime. I always didn’t bother because my distant impression was that it was another feminist stroke-fantasy where women “step up and do it better than men” and build the utopia that men always prevented them from building. In other words, a bullshit scenario like alt-right male supremacy where women are cattle. As such, it held no interest for me. Is it anywhere near a realistic take on reality?
/r/EverydayMisandry26/12/22 08:34 AM
1

You would get taxed on the proportion of the value of your company shares that sit above your total gross net worth of all possessions that exceeds $10M. On a personal level, the sigmoid curve doesn’t look at company value, only the stated worth of the shares you hold in the company. If share price goes up, your net worth increases. Simple as that. Nothing changes, because unless those shares are publicly traded, their value is clearly defined in your articles of incorporation. The starting poin…
/r/MensRights20/12/22 06:43 PM
1

Except nearly all of it can be reasonably to quite accurately estimated for taxation purposes. Now granted, rare artifacts like unique automobiles or ancient cultural artifacts are totally up in the air, but most major assets like land, housing, stocks, bonds, and precious metals can and do get quite accurately valued. It would not take much to create an average yearly value even for volatile assets. The point being, vanishingly few of the Parasite Class will be able to move more than a teeny-ti…
/r/MensRights20/12/22 05:58 PM
1

Canada's Per capita income is the same as it was in 2012. Who's growing the pie instead of trying to take someone else's piece? Why not take those pieces back from the obscenely wealthy Parasite Class that has been stealing far more than their fair share for generations now? Have a Net Worth tax that starts out with 0% at up to $10mil of net worth, and uses a sigmoid curve function to reach 100% taxation at anything above $100mil of net worth. By having a smooth curve based on an algorithmic fun…
/r/MensRights20/12/22 05:47 PM
22

That sounds like the worst possible way to shepherd new entrants into an industry. There are other ways of ensuring that the best-skilled and most resilient people rise to the top without relying on psychological torture If you think that you can abuse people because “I went through the same thing, and I turned out OK”, then you did not, in fact, “turn out OK”.
/r/MensRights20/12/22 03:24 PM
11

There's a reason on why you rarely see women stepping up and calling the feminist s**t out. The herd protects its own. If they attack their own, it’s because those members stepped out of line, and are somehow threatening other members of the herd, or the cohesion of the entire herd itself. It’s hammering the tall nail down.
/r/MensRights18/12/22 05:02 PM
4

I've seen posts by feminists who come here with genuine questions I think that many of us are particularly sensitive to the tendency of women to invade and take over any space dedicated to men, purely because it’s a male-only space. If they want to ask questions, there is a forum dedicated to that. A more targeted one could even be set up, if needed.
/r/MensRights16/12/22 02:08 AM
1

Happened to my brother and I three decades ago when we attended an RCMP recruitment info session. Was told quietly and off the record that we need not apply, and that less than one in a hundred white male applicants would even be considered. I asked, “so if I was not white or not a man?” “You would be guaranteed a position.” Never bothered applying. Now they’re staring down a staffing and recruitment crisis. Could have easily had plenty of motivation to do that career in my 20s. Now, in my 50s? …
/r/MensRights16/12/22 02:03 AM
5

Of course men are emotional. And yes, society punishes them for the very reasons you describe. But I have never seen a man go from 0 to 11, with full accompanying waterworks, just because of an advert or seeing something totally prosaic on the street. My wife had had complete meltdowns over some ducks on an icy pond, once.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 01:52 AM
17

[ Removed by Reddit ]
/r/MensRights06/12/22 12:05 AM
31

Women Rape men as frequently as men rape women: And now the real surprise: when asked about experiences in the last 12 months, men reported being “made to penetrate”—either by physical force or due to intoxication—at virtually the same rates as women reported rape (both 1.1 percent in 2010, and 1.7 and 1.6 respectively in 2011). In other words, if being made to penetrate someone was counted as rape—and why shouldn’t it be?—then the headlines could have focused on a truly sensational CDC finding:…
/r/EverydayMisandry05/12/22 04:36 PM
4

Women Rape men as frequently as men rape women: And now the real surprise: when asked about experiences in the last 12 months, men reported being “made to penetrate”—either by physical force or due to intoxication—at virtually the same rates as women reported rape (both 1.1 percent in 2010, and 1.7 and 1.6 respectively in 2011). In other words, if being made to penetrate someone was counted as rape—and why shouldn’t it be?—then the headlines could have focused on a truly sensational CDC finding:…
/r/MensRights04/12/22 09:49 PM
8

They cannot afford to debate because they don’t have anything to stand on. No evidence, no logic, no reason. That’s why they block. To censor any further chance of discussion.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/11/22 02:57 AM
5

Men do not call others who cry “gay”. At least, not as functional adults. In the absence of women, a fair number of men will even approach the other guy in an attempt to comfort or find out what is wrong, because empathy. We want to help. Men avoid mainly if they are at risk of being seen by a woman, due to the negative halo that they would be lumped in under. It’s stupid, but it’s also instinctual: we don’t (generally) want to do anything that would reduce our chances of being able to shag her.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/11/22 02:56 AM
0

The nerd is scared of bots. Go touch an incarnation of grass. Fuckin weirdo. I just don’t assume they don’t exist. And every sub of any noticeable size has them.
/r/PussyPass24/11/22 03:57 AM
0

It's the internet. You can say "simp", it's not a bad word... Stupid. And I suppose in your universe, automod bots that police comments and take down those containing banned words don’t exist? Because they do exist across wide swaths of this incarnation of Reddit. And that word is a banned one across lots of high-profile subs.
/r/PussyPass24/11/22 03:43 AM
-3

Everyone in this thread is stupid but you are the stupidest. And a wild s!mp appears!
/r/PussyPass24/11/22 03:30 AM
6

Unfortunately, this “satire” is echoed seriously and with absolutely no humour by many of the movers and shakers of the female supremacist movement. OP’s Julia Fox article is not radical in the least. In fact, it’s downright pedestrian in its misandry. It’s middle of the road, prosaic, absolutely and completely par for the course.
/r/PussyPass24/11/22 02:00 AM
7

This is the tail that wags the dog. These are the faithful adherents of the female supremacist movement, and not extremists in the least. These are the women that impressionable young girls look up to, and seek to emulate. It’s why engaging with the opposite sex for anything more than a platonic friendship is becoming an increasingly negative-sum proposition for any man in the lower-80%. It’s why so many young men are now going their own way, and avoiding female entanglements entirely. They don’…
/r/PussyPass23/11/22 09:46 PM
2

Try not to let them sacrifice themselves in the hopes of pleasing a woman who at any moment can decide to ruin him. Jumping on the sword for a woman’s benefit is rewarded by society with little pats on the head for being a good dog. Based.
/r/MensRights13/11/22 04:58 PM
1

OK mate. Touch a tit sometime. Been doing that for the last quarter-century. Bonus of being married. But it’s that experience which prevents me from just ignoring reality, like you are.
/r/MensRights11/11/22 08:21 AM
1

Again, get off reddit. For your own sake. I’m not the one lashing out in impotent frustration, dude. What I do is my own business. At no point did I ever go on a personal attack against you, yet you see fit to denigrate me and try to chase me off Reddit, simply because what I say is heresy against ideological doctrine? You can take that authoritarian, pussy-worshipping, s1mping attitude of yours and cram it where the sun don’t shine. Methinks you are in entirely the wrong sub if you are that res…
/r/MensRights11/11/22 12:33 AM
3

Go outside, mate. You sound like you're suffering from terminal onlineness. ignores presented real-world evidence, fires back with an ad hominem Mmm-hmmm. Ssssuuure, dude. Whatever you say.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 06:07 PM
6

Some women claim they suffer from depression due to bad body image caused by small breasts thus get them done on the NHS. Now make that same justification for men’s penises, and watch the widespread shaming and ridiculing begin. What’s good for the goose should be equally as good for the gander, otherwise it’s anti-male bigotry, plain and simple.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 05:45 PM
3

That went from 0 to incel fast. How so? That is quite literally fundamental female nature. Why else would they make so much efforts to strip-mine men for asset acquisition after a marriage ends? Why else would they focus so strongly on earnings and wealth in prospective mates, despite living in an era of unprecedently broken glass ceilings where women’s careers and earnings are involved? How else would they become the driver of 80% of all discretionary (after-essentials) spending in the western …
/r/MensRights10/11/22 05:42 PM
10

LOL 😂 when it ends up being a cost-savings measure instead of any real men’s health initiative. We truly live in a boring dystopia.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 05:34 PM
47

“Online classes promote misogyny, more in our 6pm broadcast.” Story: true equality “hurts women”.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 07:41 PM
101

Reproductive fraud by women = “Female empowerment”. Reproductive fraud by men = a crime. That’s our world in a nutshell. We are second-class citizens.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 01:58 AM
64

I think this one kicked off the wider shitshow, AFAIR.
/r/MensRights08/11/22 11:29 PM
252

They already are losing their minds - just look at the late-2010s reports of young wealthy men in the Hamptons getting vasectomies so that they wouldn’t be baby trapped. Whole shitfest about how men were oppressing women with those vasectomies.
/r/MensRights08/11/22 10:42 PM
27

*with your career and life-long earnings potential likely destroyed, making you financially unattractive to most women on a permanent basis. After all, if any such accusation goes public (and it becomes public domain once you become incarcerated), you then are ever only a Google search away from any risk-adverse HR department.
/r/MensRights08/11/22 08:21 PM
65

When a woman wants to remain single, she is brave, strong and independent. When a man does it, he has "Peter Pan Syndrome"? Hypocrisy. It’s called hypocrisy. if staying single, playing video games, focusing on our hobbies and careers is much more desirable than even try to be in a relationship, well... are we sure that only men are to blame? Those men have done the math, and being single has won out over women. They just don’t see the value proposition of choosing women over their own interests.
/r/MensRights08/11/22 08:05 PM
4

she can open a cylinder of carbon monoxide If it’s like most jars, she’ll either need specialized tools or a male associate to open it for her. And that isn’t sexist - men have cross-linked collagen in our skin that allows us to have up to three times greater grip strength than women, who do not have cross-linked collagen. The skin of women’s palms simply becomes much more painful much earlier for them, and can and will tear open from shearing stresses much earlier. They quite literally cannot d…
/r/MensRights03/11/22 07:47 PM
2

Feminism was never about equality. The clue is in the name.
/r/MensRights02/11/22 07:48 PM
1

There are some men who do the math, and realize that any concerted effort by them is - again, for them, - a net negative-sum proposition. These men - in general and aggregate, and I would also argue vast majority - do not hate women in any way, shape, or form. Why? Because you find shitty people everywhere, with men and women in relatively equal numbers. You aren’t going to hate all men because one was a bully to you in elementary school. If these men hate anything, it is the societal framework …
/r/MensRights02/11/22 06:28 PM
9

Communist countries kill off more of their own population Correction: authoritarian, totalitarian, & fascist countries. There have been very few implementations of communism that came anywhere close to the technical/structural definition of it. Top-down command-and-control (USSR, China, etc.) violates communism quite severely. Most “communist” countries have been as close to actual communism as North Korea or East Germany (DDR) have been “democratic”. As in, not in the least, and not to any rati…
/r/EverydayMisandry02/11/22 05:59 PM
5

The best way to manipulate a person is to isolate them from all other forms of social support.
/r/MensRights01/11/22 06:09 AM
1

Now: how many women would ever go through that process of self-discovery, rather than just falling back on the “all men are pigs” fallacy while chasing after only the highly-visible top-2% who are the most most likely men to treat them badly? Not many. Not many at all. And this is why inter-gender relations are breaking down, and why more and more men are just not bothering anymore. That juice just isn’t worth the squeeze.
/r/MensRights31/10/22 03:58 PM
1

The sunk cost fallacy can be a right b**ch.
/r/MensRights31/10/22 03:59 AM
72

Because men are the true romantics, and will ignore the “bad deal” of an arrangement if it allows them to do the romantic thing like “be a good provider”. As /u/ThrowAway29307845034/ said, Because US men are mostly ignorant of how sexist the laws are and how horrid most women are about using them. Willful ignorance: because they don’t think that being strip-mined for resource acquisition could ever happen to them.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 04:38 PM
1

[snipped misandric shite] in the first line she literally says it wasn’t her choice. [snipped derogatory shite] “just got pressured into sending nudes tons of emotional manipulation and i caved”. [snipped ad hominem shite] That is still 100% her choice. No-one walked up to her, planted a loaded gun against her temple, and forced her to do this. This was 100% her personal choice to do, which requires her to accept personal responsibility for the consequences of those actions. “Peer pressure” is N…
/r/EverydayMisandry24/10/22 08:15 PM
18

You just cut off your nose to spite your face. That requires a level of self-awareness that a lot of people - and not just women - don’t have. And with their emotion-first (and frequently, emotion-only) nature, I’m betting that a lot of women will only understand this well after the fact, once it’s too late to do anything about it.
/r/MensRights24/10/22 12:22 AM
3

This is a subreddit? Wow. Scrolled several screens already and no male teachers at all, not even Uni profs. How telling.
/r/PussyPass20/10/22 12:27 AM
3

For the exact same crime with the exact same damages, the gender sentencing gap is three times larger than the wealth sentencing gap, and seven times larger than the racial sentencing gap. Having been born female is the single largest get-out-of-jail-free card you could possibly possess. And yet, “male privilege”.
/r/PussyPass20/10/22 12:21 AM
3

So she got upset at men because of her own decisions and actions?? Make this make sense to me. Because it sounds like the rantings of a lunatic. If you make a decision to do something you need to own up to that decision, not blame the other party for failing your expectations.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/10/22 07:16 AM
6

If they aren’t indoctrinated into that lie, then it’s because they’re trying to collect Kindness Coins™ by “being an ally”. They’re looking to plug these coins into women so that sex falls out.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 11:51 PM
7

I think what is needed is a politically agnostic and religiously agnostic message that can reach other receptive men who are close to their own personal breaking point yet ignorant of this philosophy. To use logic, reason, real-world evidence and demonstrable facts to drive the message. MGTOW has virtually no politics or religion behind it, regardless of how others try to paint it via “guilt by association”. There are people from across the political and theistic spectrum, including no small num…
/r/MensRights12/10/22 08:18 PM
4

Well you said something that was sticking up for men. That's like speaking up for Jews in Nazi Germany. My god, that’s one hell of a lightbulb moment. That advocating for men in today’s society is like speaking up for Jews in Nazi Germany.
/r/MensRights12/10/22 07:09 AM
33

it feels like men are stuck in an unwinnable situation and we lack freedom that the women have to break the roles shackled onto us which causes us to become contradictions and constantly being pulled both ways is just painful And then when we reach the breaking point and finally decide to go our own way, we are somehow still “sexist misogynist pigs” for having done so.
/r/MensRights12/10/22 07:07 AM
0

Well, PeePee is courting the entire alt-right; likely his staff just accepted the public lie and assumed that MGTOW was a part of the alt-right and tried to ride that. With that said, he’s a dangerous neo-fascist that cares nothing about the average person, especially any MGTOW; he is deep in the pockets of the hyper-wealthy and only seeks to manipulate the average voter against their own best interests for his own gain. The problem with conservatism is that, across Canada and the US, every cons…
/r/MensRights12/10/22 01:49 AM
3

This. Precisely, exactly this. It’s why, if I ever become widowed, I’m just going to go MGTOW automatically.
/r/MensRights12/10/22 01:30 AM
2

Not necessarily doing away with them Although that would be nice, if possible in ways that wouldn’t fuck with our health. Unfortunately, low T is undesirable precisely because it’s such a health risk on both a physical and mental level.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 11:45 PM
3

Everything works completely differently for individuals as wealthy as these two. Inside a courtroom? 🤣🤣🤣 The gender sentencing gap is three times larger than the wealth sentencing gap, and seven times larger than the racial sentencing gap. Try another one. While they may not be in court for a crime, the same gender bigotry and misandry is still in play. Same shit, different pile.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 02:15 AM
3

She’s female. He’s male. That alone says that he will. What a woman has made or is making is often quite irrelevant in alimony judgements. The man has a “responsibility” to “maintain his wife’s quality of life”, regardless of who actually made more. Because women deserve it, don’t ya know? Patriarchy, and all that jazz.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 01:35 AM
10

Femininity isn't toxic and neither is masculinity. I actually see this as well. What makes either “toxic” is when it’s defined by the other group. Femininity shouldn’t be defined by men any more than masculinity is defined by women. Unfortunately, the culture du jour insists that women be in complete control of both definitions. Feminism is a political movement that has toxic elements. Followers can be said to say and do toxic things. And it is the tail that wags the dog; it is the extremist ele…
/r/MensRights05/10/22 10:41 PM
1

Lmao you literally can't even admit that they are the same exact level of shallow. Let’s try this another way: with greed. On the one hand, as your bog-standard middle-class, poorly-paid IT worker, would I be seen as “greedy” if I wanted to steal the labour of everyone around me just to go into space? No, because it would be ridiculous. I just don’t have that power, so I have no CAPACITY to BE greedy with respect to that desire. On the other hand, would Jeff Bezos be seen as “greedy” if he stole…
/r/MensRights05/10/22 10:09 PM
4

It's a shame buying property is damn near impossible for kids these days The boomers and “greatest generation” had their best years in an economic environment where a high school education (so zero pre-existing debt) could get them a job which could support a mortgage, a vehicle, and a family with children all on a single income. Then they closed the door behind them in the ultimate “fuck you, I’ve got mine” move, and complained that their children and grandchildren were “lazy” for not being abl…
/r/MensRights05/10/22 08:23 PM
0

Why is it more shallow for a woman to be in a relationship with someone solely for their status, than it is for a man to be in a relationship with a woman solely for her looks. If both sexes were actually successful at those objectives, than nothing would be wrong with either. The problem is that almost all women will see some to total success with those female objectives, whereas almost no men will see anything more than minor success (and typically none at all) with those male objectives. If t…
/r/MensRights05/10/22 07:44 PM
6

I have known many women who have viewed marriage and divorce in the same way most men look at an investment portfolio. It only cements my opinion that men are, in general, by far the more romantic of the two sexes.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 07:35 PM
4

You find gold diggers to be less shallow than the men who marry them just for their looks? Ah, the Apex Fallacy in actual action. Thank you for that exquisite example! Vanishingly few men ever manage to be with the women that they would personally pick as being exceptionally beautiful. If you are seeing this IRL, you are observing the top-1-2% of all men who have the wealth or power of social cachet to have multiple women actively throwing themselves at them. The bottom 98+% don’t get to choose …
/r/MensRights05/10/22 07:14 PM
6

Nope, comes from being more active. Suddenly acquiring a 1972 house that needs a full gut (5-year rolling) to upgrade it to modern standards, along with a 300m² (≈3,500ft²) hand-dug garden will do that to you. I mean, fucking awesome soil, but I’m pulling out rocks up to the size of large watermelons like popcorn on a movie theatre floor. It takes a lot to lift and shift rocks that can top 100kg. And yes, I lift them. Like a 4-banger engine block, only much less to grip. But also with no leaking…
/r/MensRights05/10/22 06:56 PM
5

I’m married, but if I ever get widowed this will be my default option. I am not looking, but I am also not blind, and I have been carefully observing society and relationships in general. What I see happening out there in the wider world (beyond my own relationship, which is shockingly stable, reasonable, and non-toxic) makes me go, fucking hell, no. It helps that I am quite the loner and misanthrope, but the idea that I need to grovel on the floor and abase myself just to be “blessed” with the …
/r/MensRights05/10/22 06:28 PM
4

Any woman that needs a “speed dating” event to find someone is likely one or more of self-censoringly high “standards”, psychologically/physically abusive, or generally repulsive or disagreeable in some manner (usually not physical). It is exceedingly trivial for any woman to find a decent and good man, especially if she lowers her own standards to match the level that most men operate their own standards on. I mean, most men do have some pretty decent standards, but comparatively speaking it mi…
/r/MensRights05/10/22 06:11 PM
2

This describes more than 98% of the women out there, in one fashion or another. I mean, hypergamy exhibits wild variations in behaviour, but it is pretty much a biological law in women. If it isn’t earnings, it is job prestige, social cachet, physical height, or any number of other things that invariably have absolutely nothing to do with who the guy is, as a person.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 04:48 PM
10

Huh. And here I’ve gone from just over 122kg a good decade ago to about 108kg now. I’m pretty tall (189cm), decently fit, and am wrapping up my fifth decade on this rock in a few short days. My main complaint with this weight loss is that I’m not wearing out my pants fast enough to justify getting new ones… without a belt, most of what I currently have I can put on and take off without unbuttoning or unzipping it. And because I take care of them, they’re in almost as-new condition.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 04:42 PM
2

it seems that women are more likely to act on those predilections than men. Any man with an underage child is usually assumed to be a pedophile, because why would they be with that child if not for pedophilia? Society has dictated that pedophilia is the only reason why any man would ever want to be with a child. Women, on the other hand, are completely immune from this assumption, and anyone who says otherwise is obviously a misogynist and a pedophile themselves. Because women’s purpose is to nu…
/r/MensRights03/10/22 06:31 PM
1

You can also see this pattern in many other usages, such as “stopping to fix a tyre”, or “stopping to use the washroom”. It’s a relatively easy pattern to spot, so once you understand it, it should “stick” rather well. Good luck in learning such a (normally) irrational language! English does not “borrow” from other languages. It follows them down dark alleys, knocks them over, and goes through their pockets for loose grammar and valuable vocabulary. - James Nicoll
/r/MensRights03/10/22 04:23 PM
1

The hypocrisy is deep and bigoted, for sure: And now the real surprise: when asked about experiences in the last 12 months, men reported being “made to penetrate” — either by physical force or due to intoxication — at virtually the same rates as women reported rape (both 1.1 percent in 2010, and 1.7 and 1.6 respectively in 2011). In other words, if being made to penetrate someone was counted as rape — and why shouldn’t it be? — then the headlines could have focused on a truly sensational CDC fin…
/r/MensRights03/10/22 04:16 PM
2

That quote alone makes so many people deeply uncomfortable. It’s legitimately amusing how badly most female supremacists and “male allies” will try to discredit that evidence by doubling down on the bigotry and misandry.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 04:12 PM
2

That’s a bullshit one, for sure: And now the real surprise: when asked about experiences in the last 12 months, men reported being “made to penetrate” — either by physical force or due to intoxication — at virtually the same rates as women reported rape (both 1.1 percent in 2010, and 1.7 and 1.6 respectively in 2011). In other words, if being made to penetrate someone was counted as rape — and why shouldn’t it be? — then the headlines could have focused on a truly sensational CDC finding: that w…
/r/MensRights03/10/22 04:08 PM
4

Boys under the age of 15 are more at risk of being raped by an adult woman, than women over 40 are likely to be raped by a man. You’ll never hear this discussed over at TwoX, however, unless it is to deny facts and claim that facts are wrong.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 04:04 PM
1

how about stopping to protect them Phrasing. That sentence structure means “going out of your way in order to protect them.” What I think you meant is, “how about stopping your protection of them”. The “to” means the stopping is done for the purpose of the words that follow that “to”. As in, the stopping is in service of the protecting, to commence or enhance it, and not to cease that action.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 03:59 PM
3

Too bad you didn’t videorecord that and upload it for world+dog to see. Someone who spouts shite like that should have their license yanked. Permanently. They have no business being a SA counsellor.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 02:59 PM
5

You forgot the /s at the very end, on its own line for high visibility. Goodness knows some female supremacist is going to be reading through this thread and use your comment as “proof” that men don’t suffer.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 02:57 PM
3

The ‘Apex fallacy’ is real, and is in wide and extensive use. All men are being judged by attributes and privileges that a very tiny proportion of men hold. This is done all the time, by a majority of not only women, but also “ally” men (who are only looking for Kindness Coins™ to plug into women so that sex drops out). So while many point to the fallacy as “having no legs” by virtue of no academic backing, I would refute that by its active employment by women everywhere, especially within Femin…
/r/MensRights03/10/22 02:29 PM
13

Solution: don’t talk to women! Women: why aren’t any guys talking to us? They must all be misogynists!
/r/EverydayMisandry03/10/22 07:18 AM
1

That thing has a mind of its own. It can engorge when we are as un-aroused as possible, and it can remain a wet noodle even if we are horny as hell and rarin’ to go. It even gets up at least once or twice a night, while we are fully asleep. And the appropriate stimulation can make it engorge just as easily as most women’s vaginas self-lubricate while they being raped.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 08:51 PM
1

The stupid, it burns. /r/confidentlyincorrect/
/r/EverydayMisandry27/09/22 09:23 AM
1

Back that up using voice-altering software that can make you seem androgynously unspecific over plain audio. That way, you can conduct 100% of all communication over audio-only online meetings and people can make their own conclusions. “I’m sorry, but I don’t feel comfortable in divulging my pronouns. I have found that I am treated more professionally when gender is taken out of the equation” - verbal judo to lead them down a path without ever saying anything concrete. It’s like trying to draw a…
/r/MensRights27/09/22 09:20 AM
1

Oh, the hypocrisy… Anyhow.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 09:12 AM
3

Hopefully they look around at their older peers, learn by observation, and go their own way. If society doesn’t want these men, what obligations do these men have to that society? Absolutely none. They should do the absolute minimum, drop out, and refuse to contribute. Look out for number one, and build as comfortable a life for themselves as they can with as small of a tax profile as they can.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 09:10 AM
3

Still, be careful. IMHO there is not much difference in risk between a feminist and a blender, in terms of where you stick your Johnson. You just have to push one button accidentally, to watch your future vanish.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 12:08 AM
1

At least you learned. A lot of men don’t. You’re above the fold already - keep it up!
/r/MensRights27/09/22 12:06 AM
-3

Surprisingly, not everyone likes body modification or hates self-discipline. But yes. Kinda. Because who would ever think a professional, competent, cleanly-cut, well-presented woman of a healthy weight would be a feminist? After all, it aligns with what so much of “the patriarchy” desires in a wife. It may not be an intentional duplicity, but it certainly is good to great camouflage.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 11:55 PM
4

But why not someone with only the latter attributes? Sure, they are becoming vanishingly rare these days, but why suffer the former in any significant capacity? Or is she really that smoking hot of a lay?
/r/MensRights26/09/22 11:48 PM
10

Are they paranoid about being around men? Unrealistic fears is one of the hallmarks of something being seriously wrong. Especially when women rape men pretty much as often as men rape women: And now the real surprise: when asked about experiences in the last 12 months, men reported being “made to penetrate”—either by physical force or due to intoxication—at virtually the same rates as women reported rape (both 1.1 percent in 2010, and 1.7 and 1.6 respectively in 2011). In other words, if being m…
/r/MensRights26/09/22 11:45 PM
12

Sounds like a feminist, or perhaps a “male ally” doing his best to acquire “kindness coins” to plug into a woman in order to have sex drop out.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 11:36 PM
4

I have become particularly attuned to such behaviour in the last decade. I would most likely notice ahead of time (to avoid reaching out on my own, and/or decline any outreach), but even if I missed those signs I would still give her the “it’s not you, it’s me” speech, and then duck. Now why would I seek to let her down as gently as possible, even though these people least deserve it? Because any woman holds an inordinate balance of legal and societal power. With only a single false accusation, …
/r/MensRights26/09/22 11:29 PM
5

This actually ties very well into Briffault’s Law, especially the corollaries. The man has already paid for everything, so her need to reciprocate in kind can be withdrawn, and so only his neglectful behaviour of sitting in front of the boob tube with a beer is valid and impactful all by itself. The fact that his hard work has put a roof over her head and food on her plate becomes utterly irrelevant.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 09:13 PM
3

Anything that exists - physical or not - is objectively measurable. If it cannot be measured, it has no relevancy to reality. Which pisses off the theists something bad, but hey. Heck, even gravity - which is likely to be just a warping of spacetime, but which may also be a particle - can be measured, and we still don’t know what TF it really is. Yup, no clear clue what gravity actually is, yet we can still measure it. And there are many things in Science and cosmology for which we have come up …
/r/MensRights26/09/22 07:04 PM
3

But unless both partners aren’t seeing a relationship as being something that deserves 60+% of their effort, why maintain the relationship? Healthy relationships are ones where both the man and the woman try to contribute more than they receive. The downside is that most women will include into their 60+% certain things - like emotional labour - that cannot be measured or objectively assessed as real and valid in the first place, much less as actually providing any benefit to their partner. It’s…
/r/MensRights26/09/22 06:54 PM
12

• ⁠Uses it against the guy in an argument • ⁠Tells others about what you said in confidence to her This is the vast majority of women. They only want to know your dark internal secrets in order to weaponize them against you. I mean, they also do this against other women, but it’s much more devastating to men because of the intimacy involved. We have vanishingly little defense against this, which is why no man should ever open up like this unless they have no other choice. It is literally relatio…
/r/MensRights26/09/22 06:47 PM
5

Start tracking everything you do on those houses, clear down to the minute and what resources you use, what you did, what you had to buy. Build up a massive database (outside of her control and knowledge) that details your participation and contributions. If this can be traced back years, she will not be able to tear full ownership out of your hands if/when she walks. At least, not unless the Judge is bleedingly sexist and anti-male, which a distressingly high majority are.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 06:38 PM
6

Any woman complaining about men not being open enough is doing either one (or both!) of the following: Projection. She is open with her emotions, so why aren’t men? A shit test, to see how men react. A high-value man will give lip service to the idea but remain strong and silent in an attractively masculine manner, a low-value man will actually take this to heart and lose his masculine attractiveness by behaving more like a woman.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 06:34 PM
20

Women are used to having things handed to them on a silver platter, and having work done for them because they are women. Many women assume that a man should come along to do any physically taxing or difficult work simply because they are women, and no other reason. Need to fill a copier? Call a man! Need something off of a tall shelf, and there is a ladder nearby? Call a man! Spider or wasp in the lunch room? Call a man! I’ve worked before in a nearly-100% female office, and everyone expected m…
/r/MensRights26/09/22 06:17 PM
6

Hitting with a hammer can extend that timeframe even more. My issue was with the one-sided misandry of this “joke”. Flip the script with a similar one for women, and hordes of people would be out baying for blood. Seriously though, I think more men need to take responsibility for ensuring pregnancy can’t happen. It makes no sense to leave the control and trust to the sex that has all the power once pregnancy occurs. Women already freak out and try everything in their power to shame men into comp…
/r/MensRights24/09/22 12:57 AM
5

A lot more reasonable and not-anti-male comments have begun to percolate to the top via upvotes now that the post is locked.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 08:10 PM
1

Nah, he’s probably drowning in all that pussy for “having been such a strong and dedicated ally”. /s
/r/MensRights15/09/22 09:26 PM
5

Only the correct, ideologically approved kinds.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 09:24 PM
10

she swore i was the father, it wasnt possible it could be anyone else blah blah blah When she has so much random unprotected sex that she can’t even come up with a decent list of names. And women have 24+ different major categories of birth control (with some individual categories having dozens to hundreds of formulations), in comparison to the man’s 2. You’d think that at least one would be effective for her, without negative side effects, and sufficiently hands-off to not need thinking about w…
/r/MensRights15/09/22 07:02 PM
12

It’s not by default because it puts the woman’s reputation and life choices under fire. It’s an active criticism of her decisions and choices. And that’s deeply misogynistic. No elected official who ever wants to remain elected will ever put this into any law on the books. The blowback from such a law would have him branded a woman-hater and likely pilloried from any community he finds himself in.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 06:52 PM
5

I've said I will be involved if paternity test proves I am the father Good. Never get involved without proof of paternity. The woman is refusing any sort of paternity test either now or in future and says that's "not fair" giving her am ultimatum as the baby is mine. Due to her reaction and flat out refusal for DNA test I have huge doubts now it's mine. Any refusal is a huuuuuge red flag. You can essentially “take it to the bank” that the child is not likely to be yours. she said she will respec…
/r/MensRights15/09/22 06:46 PM
13

Because to focus on men, specifically, as the group needing help, is misogyny. If women are suffering the same as men, even if it is a minuscule fraction compared to the men that suffer, it is “ALL [population segment]”, and never “[population segment] men”. Any focus on men at the expense of women - regardless of how justified it may be - is characterized as misogyny, plain and simple. Even if you have millions of men suffering, and just a single woman suffering from the same. That single woman…
/r/MensRights15/09/22 03:42 PM
8

They stay usually based on my wallet. A good enough reason to bounce. Trust me, you don’t want these kinds of women; they’ll drop you like a hot potato the minute something negative happens to the size of that wallet, or a materially bigger one trundles along. Downside is that this will be a large majority of women.
/r/MensRights12/09/22 02:41 PM
2

Women rape men as frequently as men rape women And now the real surprise: when asked about experiences in the last 12 months, men reported being “made to penetrate”—either by physical force or due to intoxication—at virtually the same rates as women reported rape (both 1.1 percent in 2010, and 1.7 and 1.6 respectively in 2011). In other words, if being made to penetrate someone was counted as rape—and why shouldn’t it be?—then the headlines could have focused on a truly sensational CDC finding: …
/r/MensRights07/09/22 02:14 PM
25

"Because we value men's needs more than women's." The biggest lie on the planet, and trivially demonstrably false.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 10:53 PM
145

Because when they hear a rape allegation they identify with the rapist, not the survivor …HOLY SHIT. Talk about projection. They don’t give a single flying f**k about justice, they just want punishment and revenge, regardless of the justification (or lack of it). It’s like their thinking processes are 100% emotional, without a single logical or rational neuron in their heads. Or a moral/ethical one, for that matter.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 10:47 PM
2

It’s fine for them to be hypergamous. You are correct with your first paragraph. My irritation is when they not only own it (which is also fine), but simultaneously deny it exists, be offended when it’s pointed out, and vociferously attack any man who employs any “standards” whatsoever that would eliminate women from his own consideration. It’s hypocrisy, plain and simple, and they don’t even have the moral foundation to be ashamed at such colossal and blatantly bigoted intellectual bankruptcy. …
/r/MensRights01/09/22 07:13 PM
3

Women rape men at pretty much identical rates as men rape women: And now the real surprise: when asked about experiences in the last 12 months, men reported being “made to penetrate”—either by physical force or due to intoxication—at virtually the same rates as women reported rape (both 1.1 percent in 2010, and 1.7 and 1.6 respectively in 2011). In other words, if being made to penetrate someone was counted as rape—and why shouldn’t it be?—then the headlines could have focused on a truly sensati…
/r/MensRights01/09/22 06:35 PM
5

Now pick the logical fallacies in everything you said. What I gave are real-world examples. it’s easily experienced by being born as a man, or by transitioning to being a man in all visibly physical aspects. And having open eyes to rationally and logically view the world with, mind you - many men are fully willing to join the denial train in order to “be an ally” to women in exchange for a chance for p00n. we must protect everyone's rights Except that this isn’t THEIR playbook. The female suprem…
/r/MensRights01/09/22 06:25 PM
2

A precious few never even unpackage that shovel to take it out, much less use it. Good luck finding those women, tho. Hypergamy shows up in nearly all women in a dizzying array of symptoms and behaviours across the general population. It’s not always monetarily based, or even mostly so. I mean, it figures prominently, but isn’t always at the top of the list. But it is nearly impossible to find a woman who isn’t trying to “date up” in some fashion once they reach legal adulthood (noticeably more …
/r/MensRights01/09/22 06:16 PM
3

It violates the narrative and is heretical to ideologically-driven doctrine. It’s why I usually refer to “feminism” as female supremacy. Because it literally is a supremacist movement, seeking to enslave and subjugate men by outright denying the problems they suffer from.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 06:04 PM
5

Your logical fallacy is: Appeal to Extremes But technically, yes. When a woman’s panicked scream echoes through a downtown area, even late at night, pretty much most people within earshot will come running to try and save her. When a man’s panicked scream echoes through a downtown area, even late at night, far fewer people will come running on account of one or more of: He’s a man. He should be able to get himself out of trouble. He’s a man. If he’s stupid enough to get hurt, he probably deserve…
/r/MensRights01/09/22 05:54 PM
20

There are some actual neckbeards out there, but they are typically just socially inexperienced/awkward s1mps who need a good in-person role model who can not only assist them with learning good social behaviours, but also help them refine their hygiene and clothing habits. But yes, it has also become a misandric slur meant to coerce men into silence and compliance with the sociopolitical narrative.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/09/22 05:31 PM
4

The vast majority of male-on-female rape occurs from someone the female knows and trusts. A friend or a family member, for example. The rest isn’t quite low enough to be a rounding error, but is pretty close. Plus, women rape men at pretty much identical rates as men rape women: And now the real surprise: when asked about experiences in the last 12 months, men reported being “made to penetrate”—either by physical force or due to intoxication—at virtually the same rates as women reported rape (bo…
/r/MensRights01/09/22 04:08 PM
16

even though bad shit happens to men Men account for about three-quarters of random(ish) assault victims. Women rape men pretty much as frequently as men rape women, yet about 99.98% of all arrests are of male perps or victims, and effectively 100% of all convictions are of males (some of whom are victims who are convicted due to having insufficiently overwhelming evidence of innocence). About 70% of all physically violent non-reciprocal DV victims are men, yet about 98-99% of all people arrested…
/r/MensRights01/09/22 04:03 PM
9

The number of men who remain married in fulfilling marriages as stay-at-home fathers is almost unmeasurably small compared to the number of women who remain married in fulfilling marriages as stay-at-home mothers. Very few women would ever tolerate a man who made less than her, or worse -- nothing at all.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 03:54 PM
8

It also helped that we had next to nothing worth mentioning. You got lucky. Imagine if you were some brainwashed schlub who had worked hard all his life to climb the corporate and property ladder, and now had a home and several other non-trivial assets. She could have walked off with those assets, leaving you to hold the responsibility for paying out their mortgages/interest.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 03:51 PM
1

Feminism lacks 100% of the attributes which are unique to the right wing It has all of them. It has nothing in common with the Left. The one thing it shares with the alt-right is authoritarianism Even you can't think of anything it has in common with the Left but you can think of something it has in common with the Right. You can be left-wing authoritarian You can't. By definition right wing means supporting the authorities / elites. That's what the word means. But then you have no idea what tho…
/r/MensRights30/08/22 07:09 AM
14

It's a lot simpler: feminism is right wing. Feminism lacks 100% of the attributes which are unique to the right wing ideologies. Feminism is far left, plain and simple, as it has a communistic herd-style ideology. The one thing it shares with the alt-right is authoritarianism. Which is neither a left-wing nor a right-wing thing any more than fascism is, as it’s found in all political processes. You can be left-wing authoritarian just as easily as you can be right-wing authoritarian or centrist a…
/r/MensRights30/08/22 05:33 AM
2

By the time plate tectonics bring deep stuff close enough to the surface or you get enough asteroid impacts to bring fresh, easy to mine metals, you're probably getting close to the oceans boiling away from the Sun getting hotter. That is a risk for continued human civilization as well, in the face of collapse. Even if we do survive, the death of any high-tech society will doom us to a perpetual low-tech civilization, where nothing more advanced than wooden, ceramic, or glass tools can exist. Me…
/r/MensRights17/08/22 05:42 AM
3

The gender sentencing gap is three times larger than the wealth sentencing gap, and four times larger than the racial sentencing gap. Having been born female is quite literally the single most powerful get-out-of-jail-free card that anyone can possibly possess.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 03:16 PM
6

Or in other words, women’s “workplace successes” involve air-conditioned comfort and great lumbar support.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 07:23 AM
1

and a car once. A full-sized sedan or a hatchback? And why just a car? That sure takes chasing instincts to a new level.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 01:21 AM
3

Mental-health pharmaceutical usage among women is, IIRC, almost four times higher than among men. I mean, it could just mean that men try to “suck it up” more than women. But IDK.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 01:18 AM
2

slut shaming Slut shaming never did come from men. At least, not the vast majority of it. Where the female herd is concerned, social outliers threaten the order and integrity of the herd itself, and need to be brought to heel. This is why most any insult about a woman is frequently lobbed by another woman.
/r/MensRights11/08/22 12:20 AM
0

The terms “honey badger” and “pick me girl” when describing women who advocate or support men’s rights exists for a reason. These did not spring unsolicited out of holes in the ground. The difference being that the former is respectful and appreciative, invariably spoken by men, and the latter is disrespectful and condescending, and is invariably spoken by women. The point being, women - much more so than men - tend to “circle the wagons” when they or one of their own are threatened. This is why…
/r/MensRights11/08/22 12:03 AM
2

Mad respect homie if you can vett without fucking first. It really helps when most “female behaviours” are annoying for one reason or another. For example, If she moves, crosses or un crosses her legs, hair flip, or whatever. Many of these are designed to distract a man and reduce his ability to think rationally, logically, and strategically. They are meant to cause a surge of sexual arousal that can easily overwhelm and interfere with his ability to resist her desires. And that’s exactly what a…
/r/MensRights10/08/22 11:28 PM
2

I'm thinking out of the country. Hypergamy exists everywhere, and most of the planet is deeply gynocentric. In fact, the more conservative countries will nail you even more firmly to the wall than some progressive countries. Just look at India - quite conservative, yet women have all the societal and legal power. And in eastern Europe & south-east Asia, most women who would give you the time of day are looking for thirsty western men to bait-and-switch. Your best bet is to have high standards, a…
/r/MensRights10/08/22 10:25 PM
1

Women rape men about as frequently as men rape women. The really hilarious bit about that is that many of the things that allow this to bubble to the surface are the societal concessions to “activity x now constitutes sexual assault” that feminism has pushed for. When we apply these new societal concessions across both sexes equally (true equality, FTW!), suddenly male rape needs to include “being made to penetrate” in order for feminism to not be horribly bigoted and hypocritical, and - boom, s…
/r/MensRights10/08/22 06:09 PM
7

Women demand equal pay for equal work Equal work? Bwa-ha-ha-ha! Women’s “workplace successes” are predicated on air-conditioned comfort and great lumbar support. No way in hell you will ever see any normal woman swinging a lumberjack’s chainsaw or battling 50ft swells of icy waters on a trawler or shovelling cement or hammering in tar roofing tiles in 45℃ weather.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 05:29 AM
8

Ayn Rand fantasizing about some super capitalist And then she lives out her life being supported by socialism. But hey, at least she showed by her own actions that her philosophy is unlivable.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 05:25 AM
2

It was an interestingly bad change in the sub. It certainly was. Methinks that if members (and especially mods!) had more foresight, they could have brought these incels to the red pill, in the hopes of diverting as many as possible away from inceldom. Now granted, this might have pissed off a subset, but incels are walking down a dead-end street, painted into a corner, whatever metaphor you want to use. They need healing, a good dose of reality, some effective coping mechanisms and and a way pa…
/r/MensRights05/08/22 02:40 AM
6

Get them more panties, duh. Wrong objective, wrong focus. At least, provided you want an LTR that isn’t going to be unduly influenced by her hypergamous instincts. You just want a fuck buddy? Sure, you’re on the right track. It just never was my objective, and I was speaking to other men who share similar goals.
/r/TheRedPill02/08/22 05:09 PM
32

And of course, some women are not nearly as bad as this rant suggests. Emphasis on some, and you would be correct. However, if women are a spectrum, I suspect the maxima of the bell curve would be very strongly to his end of the spectrum. The other end of the spectrum - where you would find the good, marriageable women who haven’t had more sexual partners than panties in their drawer - is getting exceedingly minuscule. There are just far too many good and honest men chasing after this tiny segme…
/r/TheRedPill02/08/22 04:42 AM
2

It gets worse where a crime is involved. The gender sentencing gap is three times larger than the wealth sentencing gap. It is seven times larger than the racial sentencing gap. To put it another way, if you take the gender and pair it with the other two opposite-privilege gaps, you could quite rationally say that a poor black woman has a better chance of evading (or at least severely reducing) a prison sentence than a rich white man for the exact same crime. Having been born female is the singl…
/r/MensRights26/07/22 01:04 AM
18

Women’s “workplace success” involves air-conditioned comfort and great lumbar support.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 08:21 PM
1

but religion you think is bad. You truly read the bible, with the objective of actually understanding it, and the only conclusion possible is that “god” is the most repugnantly evil entity in existence. Like thoroughly, disgustingly evil. Pretty miuch no redeeming qualities whatsoever. And people hold this entity up as “inspiration”, as something to actually be worshipped instead of excised. Just goes to show you how strong Stockholm Syndrome can get.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 12:53 AM
1

Are you your friend?... My wife is still very much alive, thanks. Not a widower, and I hope not to be one for several decades to come.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 12:28 AM
8

AFAIK, he initially didn’t hide anything at the start. He was transparent on what he had and what he was making (he still works because he likes what he does). But that attracted all sorts of gold diggers who were very obviously obsessed with his wealth. And even when he started hiding his assets, he noticed a sudden change in attitude for the worse; like he suddenly had to prove his worth in order to even be considered. Many times he was just straight-up ignored or treated like the dirt under t…
/r/MensRights13/07/22 06:08 PM
19

I have a friend like this as well. Made literal hundreds of millions due to a fortunate sequence of events during the dot-com bubble and bust, and thanks to savvy investments is currently just shy of the Billion mark. Lives in an old house that barely cracks 2,000ft², has a decent vegetable garden, drives a late-80s VW Jetta. The guy looks like some working-class blue-collar schlub, and wouldn’t have it any other way. In fact, when he became widowed some time back, he made an honest attempt to “…
/r/MensRights13/07/22 05:20 PM
5

I think it is horrible so many women have to be alone in their senior years Not my monkeys, not my circus. The moment they look in the mirror and realize that men die earlier due to overwork and dangerous & dirty jobs, and start pulling some of that weight themselves, is the moment I’ll start giving them some credit at doing more than just sitting around on their duffs and complaining about shit that they themselves can fix.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/07/22 03:48 PM
4

The CDC’s Rape Numbers are Misleading A rape epidemic - by women? The Sexual Victimization of Men in America: New Data Challenge Old Assumptions Why Are so Many Women Raping Boys?
/r/MensRights08/07/22 02:16 AM
5

Child support is 18 years. 24 in some jurisdictions (British Columbia, etc.) if the child goes into post-secondary education. But they have to be there constantly for the standard Uni/College terms, no skipping a term unless it’s for a co-op work sesh arranged through the school’s co-op program.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 08:24 PM
7

When my wife’s father died, I gave her plenty of room to grieve. I even force open time now if she wants us to go visit the grave site. And it’s been 16 years. If a woman can’t have the same level of consideration for you, she isn’t worth your consideration.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 08:20 PM
11

Some rare men actually find that unicorn who either doesn’t make unreasonable demands, or can be called out on those demands and actually walk back on them while honestly acknowledging the unreasonableness of what had been said. The vast majority of men, however, are not so lucky. I find myself mostly in the first category (knock on wood). A quarter century together, would never have married her had she not been reasonable. For everyone else, a strong sense of self-respect and intrinsic motivati…
/r/MensRights07/07/22 08:17 PM
10

Because blocking a woman’s ability to strip-mine a man for resource acquisition is considered “hatred against women”. Ergo, getting a vasectomy is misogynistic, because it takes control permanently out of the woman’s hands. It’s not like there is a condom that she can poke holes in, or a mind that she can convince that she’s “on the pill” when she really isn’t.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 01:03 AM
2

Is it possible? Yes. Is it likely? Not really. Being feminist without being misandric is like trying to row a boat upstream without a paddle -- everything about feminism (the river) is trying to push you in the opposite direction.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 05:59 PM
20

Canada, too.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 06:30 AM
2

It’s intentional guilt by association. Poisoning the well, as it were. It’s intellectual bankruptcy, mind you, but the gynocracy is a powerful force. They will play dirty when they have no legitimate arguments to field.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 11:11 PM
7

Serious question. How does a woman rape a man? I mean unless she's using a broom pole. Isn't an erection dependent on the man's 'mood'? I can tell that you are a biological female, via the ignorance of that statement. Which, since I am feeling charitable, I will interpret as simple ignorance instead of cultivated or intentional ignorance. Or, in the case of many bigoted and misandric swaths of the Internet such as TwoX, malicious ignorance. A man can be brought to erection in the same way that n…
/r/MensRights21/06/22 02:53 AM
5

Some of the top ones are now (quite reasonably) calling out the woman’s actions as being unreasonable. But there are still plenty trying to justify female fear by doing things like bringing up female rape statistics. It’s almost as if most women refuse to acknowledge - or don’t yet realize - that women rape men almost as much as men rape women. And this, in a country where a man cannot legally claim to have been raped by a woman. So… maybe they’re right?
/r/MensRights21/06/22 12:55 AM
6

On what planet is that an even remotely proportional response?! On a feminist world. Because the man was “undesirable”, and failed to know his place before he even opened his mouth.
/r/MensRights21/06/22 12:43 AM
5

Feminism only wants “creepy men” once it comes time to strip-mine them for resource acquisition. Ideally, without having to put out (much), or have their babies. Any man can be “creepy”, but a creepy man is typically in the lower-50%, and invariably within the lower-80% of men. Ergo, these are men which are usually considered “undesirable” by virtue of their lack of dark-triad sociopathy or assholish attributes. That’s also why “creepiness” tends to be inversely proportional to dark-triad attrib…
/r/MensRights21/06/22 12:35 AM
2

It will never happen, because far too many men are either, Brainwashed too far to ever accept the truth (most people who have become caught up in a bamboozle find the truth too painful, and will fight to maintain their ignorance), or Trying to collect Kindness Coins™ by “being an ally” to women. They are literally too thirsty to think straight, or have the “useful idiot’s” impression that women will actually reward men who do things for them, completely in violation of the three corollaries of B…
/r/MensRights17/06/22 04:07 AM
1

And they circle the wagons so well. After all, criticism of a single member of the herd must be censored with extreme prejudice, because that single criticism opens up every member of the herd to criticism. If an entire gender is immune from Personal Responsibility, they all benefit!
/r/MensRights11/06/22 02:55 AM
53

Referring to MRMs as incels is clearly just cheap insulting. And intellectual bankruptcy, to say nothing of it being an ad hominem logical fallacy.
/r/MensRights08/06/22 08:44 PM
2

"I wasted all that time on being a fuck buddy, and got no commitment/relationship/ring out of it" ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ is the same complaint made by incels, Exactly. But while Incels will be taken to task and punished for their sentiment, any woman having the above sentiment will be supported and encouraged to see men as being the problem, and not herself and her own actions and decisions. Society will do everything in its power to ensure that these women are insulated from Personal Responsibility in how…
/r/MensRights08/06/22 07:04 PM
1

at least some are clearly angry they're not getting sex What is another word for sex? Physical Intimacy. Physical Intimacy is a spectrum. On the one end, you have nothing - no physical contact whatsoever. In the middle you have hand-holding, cuddling, and other forms of close-but-not-overtly-sexual touching. On the other end, you have maximum physical intimacy - sex. So to use the word “sex” as a simple binary placeholder to avoid regurgitating a 100-page dissertation on physical intimacy that p…
/r/MensRights08/06/22 06:58 PM
7

but then they whine about getting no sex WRONG. They whine about not having any intimacy. Even Incels make the prostitute argument - that if they only wanted sex, they could hire a prostitute. But that’s the thing - THEY KNOW AND ACKNOWLEDGE that a prostitute would do ABSOLUTELY NOTHING for them. They are not looking for sex. That’s why they don’t go to prostitutes. They are looking for intimacy and human connections. That isn’t anything you can get from a prostitute.
/r/MensRights08/06/22 03:12 PM
1

The problem with these people is that they drag you down to their level then beat you with experience. I’ve got better things to do with my life than engage in a protracted marathon of a battle using tools that revolt me. In this case, I’ll take the high road. I would rather lose a conflict cleanly than win by dirty tricks. Much like the Geneva Convention, there is a behaviour of engagement that I will not cross with any opponent. Plus, there is something to be said for certain forms of avoidanc…
/r/MensRights02/06/22 07:20 PM
7

I do not believe in being punitive, that's for the courts and the justice system. Agreed. But I understand your desires. It can be karmic justice. We just need to avoid any movie with Amber Heard in it, and avoid any new Pirates of the Caribbean movie that Disney tries to release.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 10:08 PM
1

HOLY. SHIT. YES
/r/MensRights01/06/22 10:03 PM
26

Bingo Although at its core are two concepts: “being nice”, and the reinforcement of equivalent exchange, which utterly violates Briffault’s Law in a deeply hypocritical manner. For example, “you shouldn’t hit Suzy if you want her to like you”, as something that would be told to an 8-yo boy. That’s a reinforcement of both premises, which suppress any nascent dark-triad attributes in order to refocus the personality towards being kind and gentle and attentive to her needs, and reinforcing the very…
/r/MensRights30/05/22 07:06 PM
44

This is a great write up, but fails to address some of the other conditions that lead to inceldom: society’s Great Lie. This is what has been taught to young boys for most of the last century by their mothers, aunts, older sisters and female authority figures. It is also explicitly designed to make those men who internalize and conform to the Great Lie supremely unattractive to women. The entire point of the Great Lie is to make “inadequate” men intentionally self-select themselves out of the ra…
/r/MensRights30/05/22 06:52 PM
3

I get anxious around people especially woman. There are men who have experienced much the same as what you have (false accusation, etc.), and have realized that the juice is just not worth the squeeze. And because of this, they have Gone Their Own Way. They don’t hate women, they have just realized that their life is better off without them. That their best shot at happiness in life is to look out for number one, and to evaluate every decision in that regard. Understand that if this is your real…
/r/MensRights30/05/22 06:37 AM
49

The entire premise of divorce court and child support is a massive profitability machine to capitalism. No way this gets reversed without one hell of a fight. And remember: not only does the system have all the best lawyers, it also has the lawmakers on its side. It’s a system that worships the gynocracy.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 01:54 AM
17

You don't ever want to even begin to explain something like that. There are female supremacist groups who actively go around trying to find men in their community with these kinds of records, in order to lynch-mob not only these men, but also harass their employer into firing the man, as further “punishment” for “escaping justice”. Expunging that record makes $400 a very cheap investment into any on-going employability.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 05:38 AM
7

The very same facts that Feminists use to claim that almost all rapists get away with their crime, are the very same facts that could be used to demonstrate that almost all rape accusations are false. The truth is somewhere in the middle.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 05:35 AM
4

You know, that sounds so much like something Sinatra would say, I’m not even gonna bother fact-checking that.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 05:33 AM
8

There are plenty of women who do not play these games. And there are plenty of people who win the powerball. But they are vastly outnumbered by those who don’t. I’m not saying that good women don’t exist. I’m just saying that they have become so vanishingly rare in today’s world, that to actually spend any legitimate effort looking for one has become almost hilariously Sisyphean. It’s become, essentially, no different than a very literal unicorn hunt. Or a Sasquach hunt. Or a UFO hunt. Take your…
/r/MensRights27/05/22 05:31 AM
4

Why do you think Henry Cavill won’t physically touch female fans with a dirty barge pole? I mean, when fucking Superman has got issues to worry about, they ain’t issues that any normal human can just sneeze at.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 04:19 AM
6

I do sometimes wonder if Islam isn’t right about women. As an atheist (who would likely be killed in most any Islamic country), I use that to highlight the hypocrisy of the far left. On the one hand, they venerate Islam as an “enlightened” religion, yet on the other hand, they ignore all of its baked-in hypocrisies and bigotries. Saying, “Islam was right about women” places them into a no-win situation, where they either have to acknowledge that Islam is an exceedingly ugly and reprehensible rel…
/r/MensRights27/05/22 01:27 AM
14

Why doesn’t he just do the reverse to her? You mean accuse her of rape? He’s a man. Who TF would believe him?? Most any man who pulls an “I’ve been raped by a woman” story is usually laughed clear out of the police station, or whatever other authority it’s being reported to, typically with a “if you got it up you must have enjoyed it” response thrown into his face for his troubles. And male rape victims are prime time comedy gold for our entertainment system. Which ought to tell you everything a…
/r/MensRights27/05/22 01:14 AM
6

Thats a very long and convulated way to tell me I should have raped her 😐 No. It’s not about rape. If you rape a woman, you have equally lost the value test. But consider this: is it any wonder that rape and nonconsensual stories and porn have a far higher consumption among women than men? Women set men up to prove themselves as effective providers. This is founded on being aggressive, taking risks, and overpowering the competition. From a historical perspective across 99.999% of our history, it…
/r/MensRights26/05/22 10:34 PM
4

I was spooning naked with her but she said no to sex so we just slept naked. You obeyed the societal rules, which killed her tinglies. You failed her value test. Why else do you think older women (mothers, teachers, relatives, etc.) teach those “no means no” rules to all young boys that they can influence? They want their daughters to get the truly valuable men -- the dark-triad sociopaths and assholes that might pay lip service to the Great Lie, but who ultimately generate oodles of tinglies in…
/r/MensRights26/05/22 10:22 PM
3

Employers terminating people for such reasons that have nothing to do with job performance is a growing problem from what I’ve seen. It’s a balancing act, not a one-side-of-the-spectrum issue. On the one hand, employees need to avoid bringing their biases into the company where it can hurt the company. Being openly homophobic (as just one example) can hurt not only fellow employees, but also the company as a whole by pissing off or driving away customers. On the other hand, if employees keep the…
/r/MensRights26/05/22 09:56 PM
34

Yes, I am above that level now. Good. Remember: the best revenge is in living well. Learn from this, become internally motivated so that you no longer rely on anyone but yourself for happiness, and prosper. But especially the prospering bit. Arrested for DV is still on my record. Now, that ain’t right. Surely there is some way you could have that expunged, especially since you were found not guilty?
/r/MensRights26/05/22 09:50 PM
42

And then feminists proceed to be happy that "men are getting what they deserve" In their ideologically-addled brains, this is exactly what is happening. And what’s worse, they feel fully justified in that position. Men are having their lives destroyed over “feelings” and “emotions”.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 09:42 PM
48

I lost my job (120k+) for no reason, and purely based on the arrest. Sounds like you are in the States. How are you doing now? Are you back at or above that earnings level?
/r/MensRights26/05/22 09:40 PM
11

People win employment discrimination suits all the time With evidence And that is the key point. You need to get hired, first, then experience an issue arising from your legal history. Without that evidence of suddenly being let go without cause, you don’t even have a suspicion that they used your legal history against you. At least in Canada, once you get past your probationary period you can only be fired with cause, or under other very limited circumstances that need to be clearly spelled out…
/r/MensRights26/05/22 09:28 PM
17

Thats weird if he has documentation saying he's innocent it'd be employment discrimination. And how would you prove that? How can you tell the difference between a rejection of your CV based on your legal history, and either no response back from an application or a “not a good fit” response?
/r/MensRights26/05/22 09:23 PM
70

This is also how women wield the force of law to “punish” men for perceived injustices, regardless of actual validity. I mean, who goes to the hospital five days later to have a rape kit done? That’s like waiting until spring to harvest your prior year’s crop of raspberries.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 07:53 PM
5

I don't track this Deep vs Amber stuff. Did he do to her anything close to cutting a finger? He was born male. That is a massively criminal offence. That justifies any abuse visited upon him.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 05:11 PM
1

What a load of absolute white-knighting drivel. The diversity quotas hurt men far more than it does women. There is no comparison to getting a top job offered on a plate simply because you are woman to being point blank rejected from a job application simply because you are man. The discrimination against men is there no matter how many times you spew the "it hurts women because they're not ready for the jobs yet". If these quotas really were hurting women then you would hear the feminists, SJWs…
/r/MensRights19/05/22 03:58 PM
6

ultimately, most organizations still will always go with the most qualified individual as they should. Unfortunately, the numbers do not back you up. Ableism is rife within promotions. Taller men get promoted over clearly more competent shorter men all the time. Racism can also exist in companies, either as a part of the culture or within key individuals. Although this, at least, can be combatted with good internal procedures and a solid company culture reinforced from the top down (that last bi…
/r/MensRights17/05/22 07:09 PM
72

The diversity quotas are cancerous Correct. and actually only serve to hurt men. False. They also hurt women by promoting them to those positions before they are ready. Keep in mind that a man will seek out a new position starting at when he is about 60% ready for that position. This is an average, some men seek out positions when they have zero experience, others wait until they are 100% ready. But on average, a man will jump at an offer when he feels that he has about 60% of the skills to do t…
/r/MensRights17/05/22 05:41 PM
1

Except that in general, any man being childish is typically smacked upside the head with a sledgehammer and told to smarten up. Unless he’s stupidly wealthy or handsome. But still - very few men get away with being childish without being called out on that behaviour. Women? Not so much. They’re a protected class of people when it comes to behaving badly - to call them out on that bad behaviour is misogyny and hatred of their sex.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 09:42 PM
2

It’s rather adorable to see irony and hypocrisy skipping down the road hand-in-hand.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 09:37 PM
4

Mocking by mirroring is not exactly their level. We’re not actually saying that women are gross, we’re only causing their hypocrisy to boil out of the woodwork by imitating them sarcastically, and then pointing out the discrepancy.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 09:32 PM
1

It's the perfect example of low effort, childish posting. Which is why such a post comes spontaneously from a woman, but is only mirrored by a man to display how childish it is.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 09:29 PM
4

TBH, the original MGTOW sub did get rather egregious towards the end. There were actual legitimately rule-breaking posts and comments in there. I can only assume that the !ncels took over the mod team and allowed that sub to degrade. With that said, MGTOW2 was wonderfully moderated, with a clear focus on self-improvement and pretty strong prohibitions on rule-breaking. I do recall !ncel-like behaviour getting the boot very quickly and decisively whenever it cropped up. Personal hot take: in thei…
/r/MensRights09/05/22 04:58 PM
8

I like the thoroughness of this breakdown. It’s clearly not taking one side or another, but pointing out that there is a material downside in what is being requested by the girlfriend.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 12:21 AM
11

goddam she’s hot, but it would be safer to fuck a blender. /r/BrandNewSentence
/r/MensRights28/04/22 07:13 AM
12

For all those looking to get some Sauvage, a tip on the naming: Parfum is typically the strongest amount of aromatics. Use this if you are going to be in a place that already has strong scents, like a nightclub or a smoking den. Eau de Parfum is a middle ground, where the fragrance is not particularly strong, but also clearly present. A generalist fragrance, one unlikely to be strong enough to be off-putting, but also strong enough to have some presence in most conditions. Eau de Toilette has th…
/r/MensRights24/04/22 03:34 AM
8

Women already get far more safety and appreciation than any man does. What is this guy smoking?
/r/EverydayMisandry17/04/22 07:25 AM
4

The ones who are desperate enough to go topless are not the kind of women us men would want to see go topless. I mean, some guys are thirsty enough that anything goes, even decades older or hideously ugly. But still.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 07:19 PM
96

Paternity fraud is 100% legal because the only victim is the man. Reproductive fraud (stealthing, etc.) is also 100% legal, but only in one direction - when the man is the victim. It’s 100% ILLEGAL when the woman is the victim. Make this make sense to me. Because I see female supremacists of all stripes defending both vociferously, and almost without exception. How is this “equality” in any shape, manner, or form?
/r/MensRights14/04/22 04:52 PM
1

I am all for any abortion law that provides equal rights to both men and women. I am against any abortion law that promotes the abilities and rights of one gender above the other. We are still short, technologically speaking, if the man wants to keep the baby but the woman doesn’t - artificial wombs are not quite a thing just yet - but the ability to “abort” a baby can be done by both genders to a relatively equivalent threshold, with the man conducting a paper abortion to divest himself of all …
/r/MensRights08/04/22 07:31 AM
2

TL;DR: Don’t listen to what they say, observe what they do. Because the two rarely match up - actions speak much louder than words.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 06:37 PM
10

Having a victim mentality means you will always have to justify being a victim. It will never end, no matter how perfect men are. Even if we were to perfect artificial wombs and split our species into male and female with zero contact between the two, women would still cling to stories and myths that would allow them to place all their current problems at the feet of men. In a strange way learned helplessness is addictive, because it absolves you of responsibility, freeing you from having to imp…
/r/MensRights02/03/22 05:57 PM
1

Are you about to divorce or you think it will eventually come to a divorce? Only if either my wife or I change psychologically in some significant and incompatible way. You see, I got stupidly lucky. My wife is pretty much a unicorn. On the one hand, she’s a moderately-strong progressive. Agrees with the reasonable and rational stuff. On the other hand, she’s surprisingly traditional in some ways, especially in terms of division of labour and enjoying it when I take the lead in a “patriarchal” m…
/r/MensRights28/02/22 07:51 PM
2

Opinions differ about the granularity of MGTOW, I find this to be more nuanced and accurate.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 07:31 PM
3

If I ever become widowed, I will then be able to say that I am MGTOW. Because from what I have seen out there, no way in hell will I willingly expose myself to those risks. Otherwise because I am currently married, the most I can claim is to being red pilled. With that said, I have to admit that my entire red pilling has come about from what I experienced before my current relationship and outside of it (observing other relationships around me). Because while a smart man learns from his mistakes…
/r/MensRights28/02/22 07:23 PM
1

Well what the ultra woke is doing is rejecting biology, so how can you argue against them then say that it’s biology? The political horseshoe is far more accurate than most think. The far-leftists have become as immunized from reality as the alt-right, I don’t deny that. However due to its newness, the ramp-up to that insanity is remarkably steep and still relegated to the extreme left. Most of the left still rely on a solid foundation of real-world evidence and the Scientific Method. The whole …
/r/MensRights25/02/22 05:56 AM
1

Culture may have changed, yes. But a majority of female nature springs from evolutionary biology and gender dimorphism, which is far more fundamental and pervasive.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 10:53 PM
2

https://qz.com/967895/throughout-history-women-rulers-were-more-likely-to-wage-war-than-men/
/r/MensRights24/02/22 10:19 PM
1

Ironically, there was an analysis of European kings and queens done rather recently, and although kings as primary rulers vastly outnumbered queens as primary rulers, queens were significantly more bloodthirsty than kings when it came to wars.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 07:53 PM
63

I am finding more and more men who look at this mountain of societal/biological expectations, shake their heads, and say, “you know, I have got better mountains to climb with the life that I have. I don’t need to waste my time with this one.”
/r/TheRedPill16/02/22 06:27 PM
17

Underrated truth for far too many women. There are exceptions. But they’re called outliers for a reason: they’re bloody rare. I ought to know, I married one of those unicorns.
/r/MensRights08/02/22 05:08 PM
3

I suddenly realize just how much commitment simply turns me off, so many women bring baggage into your situation like kids or a personality that hasn’t been given a reality check. I’ve tried with some beautiful women but the idea just nauseates me, it’s much work and energy that I could put into myself is how I feel. I went from falling asleep sad that I may never find love my whole life to feeling lonely once a month and generally enjoy being alone, the idea of a woman being there fucking up th…
/r/TheRedPill06/02/22 01:57 AM
3

Women fought against at-fault divorces precisely because they were most often at fault, and so were on the losing end.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 06:02 AM
1

Putin seems to be caught between a rock and a hard place. On the one hand, he has lorded over all of the criminal/corruptive elements in Russia by acting as a strong man. He keeps them in line by being stronger than any single one of them. On the other hand, he has to continue to appear strong no matter what, otherwise these elements will tear him down and replace him. As soon as those sharks smell blood, they’ll gang up to take him out. On the gripping hand, I suspect Ukraine is not really a fa…
/r/MensRights26/01/22 04:11 AM
2

I define a feminist as someone who believes in gender equality That already eliminates the vast majority of "feminists". Including pretty much all of the leaders, writers, movers and shakers of the movement, including all of the founders.
/r/MensRights20/01/22 05:33 AM
3

Feminism never was about equality. The clue is in the name.
/r/MensRights20/01/22 05:31 AM
4

I don't think the feminists you are thinking of represent feminism. So you call yourself a feminist. Okay. Let me leave you, then, with a most excellent copypasta from /u/girlwriteswhat: So what you're saying is that you, a commenter using a username on an internet forum are the true feminist, and the feminists actually responsible for changing the laws, writing the academic theory, teaching the courses, influencing the public policies, and the massive, well-funded feminist organizations with th…
/r/MensRights20/01/22 05:25 AM
7

Ah, yes. Isolate those who are already suffering the consequences of isolation and the resulting lack of experience. Because that always worked out so well.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 09:26 PM
2

OH! So… a s!mp. And not just a regular run-of-the-mill one, but one that pays loud and vociferous virtue-signalling lip service to feminist talking points in order to turn himself into a visibly noticeable “ally” to women. A proto-1ncel, as it were. A fake ally, in order to “win brownie points” to get into the sack with them. And what really chaps his ass, I’m betting, is seeing all those women he would love to get closer to, eagerly jumping into the beds of assholes and misogynists who routinel…
/r/MensRights18/01/22 04:26 AM
5

Unfortunately, nor can feminist missionaries like EW identify when their drivel should be sarcasm. Oh, the poor dear! We should all send thoughts and prayers in the hopes that she can educate herself into an egalitarianist instead of remaining as bigoted as she is.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 03:15 AM
3

Outliers exist, but IME this is what invariably happens. No matter how well you know them, always assume that your current job will start hunting for your replacement.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 12:26 AM
5

You forgot the /s to signify that your post was sarcastic. Remember, not everyone can identify sarcasm easily.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 12:23 AM
2

I'd rather pay for-profit businesses directly for service. At least they have to compete for our business instead of coercing us to pay them. Your local ma-and-pa? Sure. Anything larger, like on the State or National level? Think twice. Almost all large businesses have a process in place that values human lives at a much lower level than profit. Even car manufacturers have been caught refusing to do recalls because the cost of the recall will cost more than litigation for several hundred lives l…
/r/MensRights13/01/22 06:50 AM
2

It's quite literally the political horseshoe manifesting itself across the entire spectrum of social subjects. Extremism at one end becomes largely indistinguishable from extremism at the other end, aside from the details. In general and at altitude, they both become much more identical than different, as most differences end up being mere window dressing to the main extremism. Or in simpler terms: same shit, different pile. And I'm speaking as a social democrat and borderline socialist - someon…
/r/MensRights13/01/22 01:58 AM
3

And I sure as shit dont want to date a political conservative. That sounds worse than dating a feminist... Im a scientist and an educator - I can't nod my head along with the right-wing ideologies. Being a scientist means you have to follow the evidence. That already makes you an enemy of the political/economic/social right, as well as the extremist portions of the far left. I mean, remember when Science was somehow “sexist” for pointing out gender dimorphism? For how there are very real physica…
/r/MensRights12/01/22 08:23 PM
5

You joke, but that is the crux of the problem. Two incomes allows for a lot more discretionary income to be spent than a single income.
/r/MensRights12/01/22 08:18 PM
2

She says average-looking men who simply take a shower receive the same privileges and respect as highly attractive women who have to labor over their looks. ...The fuq? No, they don't. A man has to be exceptionally handsome to get even close to the privilege of an average woman. I mean, does he have to work with make-up? No. So that viewpoint is partially correct, even though other forms of grooming (shaving, hair products, etc.) still hold valid. But any average man just taking a shower, and me…
/r/MensRights09/01/22 06:35 AM
1

You just walked into an echo chamber and pissed all over their echo. That never goes well.
/r/MensRights04/01/22 05:33 AM
11

It was not started to make men and women equal, it was starting to give women more rights. Feminism was never about equality. The clue is in the name.
/r/MensRights26/12/21 12:34 AM
20

You mean the "nice old ladies" who shamed men for not volunteering to go off and die in war? You mean the White Feather campaign? Yeah, that was some brutally misandric shit.
/r/MensRights26/12/21 12:28 AM
94

It’s almost exclusively female officers. Male officers get shitcanned if they coerce female inmates. Female officers get a slap on the wrist if they coerce male inmates. The bigotry and double standards are stunning.
/r/MensRights26/12/21 12:26 AM
1

but it wasn't always like this It has always been like this throughout history. Check in on any century, and you will find that this is the default state. What’s different is information transfer. What we can do now is see incidents like this immediately, throughout the world. So now all this shit is hitting us in the face 24/7, and we have no way to ignore it unless we become intentionally ignorant. I agree that hatred is antiproductive, but anger is not. Anger is what is needed to make this be…
/r/PussyPass20/12/21 08:15 AM
1

Spain is doing some pretty nasty things to men’s rights as well.
/r/PussyPass18/12/21 02:49 AM
1

It’s a stupid assumption for men. It’s a very real and valid assumption for women.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 04:14 AM
6

Purity spirals can be a vicious thing. They affect and are triggered by extremism of any kind, whether it is on the left or the right. The key thing is to avoid extremists, be it either the racist/bigoted alt-right or the woke far-left kind.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/21 01:06 AM
2

Even when you compare apples-to-apples (identical jobs, identical positions), it exists and is significant: for women under 35, they materially out-earn men of the same age. The gender wage gap has young men on the losing end.
/r/MensRights10/12/21 02:29 AM
1

Beautiful. Very nicely done.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/12/21 01:26 AM
6

As expected they led with the statistic that about 5-10% of cases are found to be a false accusation regarding sexual assault. Those same sources can also be turned on their heads to “prove” that only 5-10% of rapes are real, and that the rest are bullshit. Reality is somewhere in the middle. Rapes happen, but also completely false accusations were no intercourse ever took place. As well as fully consensual sex where the woman regrets it afterwards.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/12/21 03:55 AM
1

Sounds like the US FBI, pre-2012. Sounds like the US DoJ to this day.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 03:24 AM
1

Sounds like male incel logic to me. Ah, there is that expected ad hominem meant to socially shame me into silence. Chop his arm of to be with a "hideous" woman? Really? If you drop the hyperboles, then you can also say that for every male incel, there might exist a woman somewhere in this world who might be willing to be with him. Actually, no. Females do not work off of the same sexual strategy. A man is willing to be with any willing woman close to his own SMV. A woman suffers from hypergamy, …
/r/MensRights01/12/21 11:26 PM
1

I’m not arguing about their mental state, I’m arguing about the terminology used to describe them. Using incel is materially and significantly incorrect.
/r/MensRights01/12/21 04:15 PM
0

Wait, how young are you? Do you know about men with kids? With family members to take care off? Men in healthy relationship with women? You're fucking screaming like an enraged child talking about the wrong thing here dude. Go take your cool aid kid Dude, I’m likely older than your own father.
/r/MensRights01/12/21 04:41 AM
4

Online profiles give no opportunity for character and personality to shine through. It’s all just optimized for physical attributes, or how you can best spin those through photography skills and - if needed - Photoshop. It’s why OLD is pretty well the worst way for any sub-9/10 guy to meet women on the regular for anything approximating a relationship. These guys are going to be largely ignored by default.
/r/MensRights01/12/21 03:57 AM
2

If they are so good why do they need a man who will look after them, this ain't the 1950's. Oh, goodness; 100% this. The glass ceiling in the economy has been utterly shattered. Women under the age of 35 actually make more than men for the exact same job. As in, the gender wage gap has reversed, making young men the losers, and women the unjustifyingly enriched. Yay affirmative action? And the reason why this hasn’t “trickled up” to older women comes down to simple timing: these younger, more ed…
/r/MensRights01/12/21 03:54 AM
5

Men can walk down the street alone at night with little worry of being verbally accosted or worse. False. Men make up 89% of all physical assault victims. And across genders, men get physically assaulted by women (outside of a relationship) almost twice as often as women get physically assaulted by men (outside of a relationship). It is quite literally much safer for a woman to walk down a dark and dangerous alleyway than it is for a man to do so. With a single scream, women could have any numbe…
/r/MensRights01/12/21 03:11 AM
3

I’m a white man and nothing you say in your second paragraph has ever happened to me. Ah, a data point of one. How adorable. You actually think that means something. To say that white man are unprivileged is a blatant falsehood. Then pick one. Pick a single privilege that men have over women that isn’t down to primarily biological differences or gender dimorphism. The crickets are waiting.
/r/MensRights01/12/21 03:03 AM
5

The former is apparently “misogyny” and needs to be suppressed. The latter is apparently “female empowerment”, and needs to be celebrated. If anyone can justify that, they need to have a pretty fucked-up worldview.
/r/MensRights01/12/21 02:27 AM
1

it’s safe to say these women will be single throughout their lives Many have had babies with Chad Thundercock, but couldn’t lock him down with that baby (because he had options, and they weren’t anywhere near his top ones). So they’re trying to find Billy Beta Moneybags to strip-mine for resource extracion. Only now as Alpha Widows they’re sour and loathe to waste time, so they are doing everything in their power to triage those men they do come across with harsh rules and unreasonable demands, …
/r/MensRights01/12/21 02:20 AM
7

Female incel No such thing. Femcel, perhaps. But incel? That is an impossibility. It is impossible for anyone to be both female and an involuntary celibate unless they are imprisoned on another planet which has absolutely no cis-hetero human men to speak of. Actually physically on this planet? Any woman would be voluntarily celibate, because no matter how hideous she is, there is a man somewhere who would gladly chop off his left arm to be with this woman. He may not be desirable, but he’s there…
/r/MensRights01/12/21 02:14 AM
3

femcel Good that you used this term instead of incel. Because female incels are an impossibility. You cannot be female and be involuntarily celibate unless you are on another planet with no human males.
/r/MensRights01/12/21 02:06 AM
5

How do we get FDS banned for hate speech and bigotry, as it should be? You can’t. FDS follows the narrative ideology of female empowerment, and as such, to ban it would be no different than misogyny. Any ban would be heresy against doctrine. The fact that they display bigotry and gender hatreds that are on-par - if not exceeding - to that of the worst incel groups I have ever seen, is utterly immaterial.
/r/MensRights01/12/21 02:01 AM
3

These are the women that men go their own way to avoid.
/r/MensRights01/12/21 01:58 AM
6

White men are not marginalized in the United States or in the UK. The suicide rate would disagree with you on that one. People don’t commit suicide when they’re in a privileged group and have their problems whisked away by white-knights and s!mps looking to serve them for the merest whiff of p00n. They commit suicide when they are supremely unprivileged, and realize that there is nothing left for them to hope for. That no-one cares about them, that they are ignored purely because of their gender…
/r/MensRights01/12/21 01:52 AM
9

Until men learn to undermine the tournament system A strange game. The only winning move is not to play.
/r/MensRights01/12/21 01:43 AM
2

So fucking what? You going to let what someone writes chap your ass? F**k them. The entire point of “going your own way” is to no longer be hanging off the sharp hooks of societal - and more importantly, female - approval. By reacting to this highly biased Wikipedia article, you are playing straight into their hands. Why TF do you care what they write? So what if it’s a lie? The female supremacy movement has been lying about men for over a century now in order to manufacture the boogeymen they n…
/r/MensRights28/11/21 10:14 AM
19

Agree upon going dutch wherever one goes, and if this is unacceptable, walk away. About a decade and a half ago a friend of mine was widowed. A few years later he decided to climb back onto the playing field of relationships. Going Dutch was a most excellent way of filtering out the foodie dates and anyone with even the barest whiff of being a gold digger. I think almost half of all women either got upset at him (trying to shame him into paying), or immediately ghosted him. A few tried to shame …
/r/MensRights28/11/21 07:55 AM
32

Then get snipped. And if you get even remotely wealthy attractive, watch a majority of the women who chase you go absolutely ballistic when they discover that their attempts to baby-trap you have been completely in vain. The older ones with audible clocks who are desperate to lock down a submissive beta provider can get particularly vicious. Double points for when they try to foist a baby off as yours without knowing that you had actually been snipped. Saw that kind of a meltdown second-hand mys…
/r/MensRights24/11/21 06:12 AM
20

Going Dutch on the first date - to say nothing about the second, third and tenth date - is a great way to separate out those leeches who only see you as a wallet to be emptied, from those women who actually want to get to know you as a human being because they are looking for more than just a financial windfall. With that said, careful observations of others (because I have been off the market for the last quarter-century) is indicating that the latter half has become an endangered species, if n…
/r/MensRights21/11/21 07:17 PM
6

Another exquisite production!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/21 06:54 PM
1

Your feminist programming is exquisite. Not a single untruth and reality-denying propaganda point is out of place. Everything conforms to the ideological narrative, and commits no heresy against established doctrine whatsoever.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 09:33 AM
6

Incels are the problem, but only because society has taught them to paint themselves into a corner without telling them that the only thing they’re going to be doing is shooting themselves in the foot. Then we get guys who are upset that the world isn’t working like society said it would work for them. Sure, they were the ones who painted themselves into a corner. But it was society that gave them the instructions to do so, and claimed that it would work out well for them. Who do we blame - the …
/r/MensRights13/11/21 08:43 AM
10

Women could also make men less violent by being more critical of their erotic preference for dark triad-men and acting less on it. Being attractive to women can be a big incentive to being a criminal. “You would force personal responsibility upon women? You damn dirty misogynist!” - the vast majority of society
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/21 09:16 AM
1

Radical ideology is the most difficult to displace, because it’s built upon a foundation of emotions and feelings, and often requires the abrogation of evidence and facts. Or in other words, You cannot reason a person out of position that they did not reason themselves into. - Jonathan Swift
/r/MensRights12/11/21 06:01 AM
7

Most women find themselves married to men they find disgusting - 80% of divorces filed by women , 50%+ marriages end in divorce. You mistake cause with effect. If not, why did these women marry those “disgusting” men in the first place? It comes down to the aphorism: you run into an asshole in the morning, you’ve run into an asshole. You run into assholes all day long, you are the asshole. There is no statistical possibility that so many men are “disgusting”. And even if so, we then need to ask:…
/r/MensRights06/11/21 09:09 PM
7

Not if your an ugly woman. Real talk, they got it bad. Any member of the upper-98% of women can walk into a venue crowded with a large number of unattached men, strip naked, loudly advertise her sexual availability, and someone will step up to accept that offer. Now granted, the guy might not be desirable to her, but almost every woman above truly hideous levels of attractiveness will have multiple simps that can and will jump at any opportunity she provides Do the reverse, as a guy in a venue f…
/r/MensRights06/11/21 08:59 PM
8

women are biologically weaker. The only completely true thing you have said. they are raped, assaulted and abused so much more often than men Women rape men almost as often as men rape women (46% to 54%). You don’t see this in the gov stats for a number of reasons, including female-on-male rape only being seen as possible since 2012 (FBI refused to count male rapes by women before 2012, many states still refuse to do so) and police software being hard-coded to have the rape victim as female, as …
/r/MensRights06/11/21 08:44 PM
8

Yall cant lump us all together. And yet, far too many women lump all men together, and then go all #killallmen completely unironically. So in times like these, I love to pull out that venerable feminist example of a bowl full of smarties with three of them lethally poisoned and randomly mixed in with the rest. The metaphor being that women want to hold men at arm’s length until they are sure that these men are safe. So if women don’t want to eat from their bowl, why should men be forced to eat? …
/r/MensRights24/10/21 07:07 AM
8

Female-approved benevolent sexism is still very much a thing. Men white-knighting is still very much a thing. Women being the gatekeepers of sex is still very much a thing. Thirsty young men who are absolutely controlled by their own sex drives is still very much a thing. Until we can come up with a way of shutting down a man's sex drive for significant periods of time without affecting anything else (testosterone, etc.), young men will continue to genuflect and worship at the pedestal of pussy …
/r/MensRights10/10/21 04:58 PM
5

Fair warning, it gets badly cropped in the default Reddit client unless you follow OP’s Imgur link in his comment. Looked like a turd until I popped over to Imgur and saw it in all its glory. Well done, OP!
/r/MensRights10/10/21 04:25 PM
4

And if you’re in a one-party-consent region (most of the States, all of Canada), wear a body cam or stick your phone on record with the camera sticking up out of a shirt pocket. Ideally, both a camera and a witness.
/r/MensRights07/10/21 05:17 PM
21

Should also post this on /r/PussyPass
/r/MensRights07/10/21 05:13 PM
11

“And this is why men are going their own way and turning their backs on relationships: because the juice just isn’t worth the squeeze anymore, and hasn’t been worth it for some time now.”
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/10/21 04:45 PM
18

A gold digger will have her youth and beauty and fertility, and will be countering your offer of wealth and resources with her own offer of reproductive and sexual exclusivity, along with a very low n-count. These FDS women invariably have none of the former trio, and likely aren’t interested in guaranteeing any of the latter three. They quite literally think that they don’t have to bring anything of value to the table. That their presence alone is sufficient “value”.
/r/PussyPass06/10/21 04:35 PM
11

Female Dating Strategy (FDS) is a subreddit for female “Incels”. I put that in quotes because that inceldom is entirely voluntary, which makes it much different than what men experience. So they are technically volcels seeking strategies for forcing men to “put out” without having to counter with contributions of their own, which is a common strategy for women who are hitting the wall and desperate to lock down a man without wasting any more of their youth doing so. Essentially they want to eat …
/r/PussyPass06/10/21 04:27 PM
25

Female Dating Strategy is a subreddit for female “Incels”. I put that in quotes because that inceldom is entirely voluntary, which makes it much different than what men experience. So they are technically Volcels seeking strategies for forcing men to “put out” without having to counter with contributions of their own, which is a common strategy for women who are hitting the wall and desperate to lock down a man without wasting any more of their youth doing so. Essentially they want to eat their …
/r/PussyPass06/10/21 04:26 PM
22

Going Dutch on the first date has become a most excellent method of weeding out “foodie dates” and women obsessed with perpetuating toxic masculinity. A friend of mine was widowed about the mid-aughts after a good 15 or 16 years of marriage. When he finally came back up for air and tried to find more companionship, he was shocked to see the majority of women holding deeply patriarchal expectations about dating, in particular that the man needs to pay for everything. Going Dutch eliminated a sign…
/r/PussyPass06/10/21 04:22 PM
26

They only see men as a fungible resource to be strip-mined for resource extraction. They don’t give a single fuck about the man himself. He could be the best husband and father on the planet, but if he hews anywhere close to true equality and equal partnerships, he’s viewed as a failure of a man. These women care only about the size of a man’s bank balance. And that’s a prime definition of toxic masculinity.
/r/PussyPass06/10/21 04:10 PM
2

so you are white see i knew The only people concerned with that would be racists.
/r/MensRights28/09/21 08:44 PM
3

cope plus you’re white Ah, racism. What a nasty stench. Would my comment have been any better had I been black? Or Asian?
/r/MensRights27/09/21 09:01 PM
13

It makes a lot of men want to stay away from women The juice is just not worth the squeeze anymore, and hasn’t been worth it for some time now. I know more and more men who have avowed marriage, and are unlikely to ever engage with women for anything other than short-term relationships and booty calls. Why bother, when we are neither respected nor appreciated?
/r/MensRights26/09/21 10:01 PM
2

Affordable sex dolls is the solution. Yes. Especially for younger men. Women are already losing their shit over how realistic these dolls are. I can only suppose they are worried as hell over how they’re being replaced, otherwise why the impotent rage over these dolls? No other answer makes any sense. I’ll just be over on the sidelines with my popcorn, watching more and more young guys fuel that sex doll industry. Here’s hoping they develop full autonomous androids that can replace women entirel…
/r/PussyPass15/09/21 09:33 PM
2

Except something that lasts 24hrs instead of only 24 minutes.
/r/PussyPass15/09/21 03:07 PM
3

Legalize prostitution and tank the price of pussy. Its the only real solution to this bullshit. That is just one small shard of the entire kaleidoscope. Yes, it’s not a tiny one, but it isn’t anything approaching a major one, either. And this rarely works out in terms of convincing politicians, because who opposes prostitution? The majority are women. Because it devalues the price of their own pussy. What we really need is something that men can take that will clear their heads without fucking w…
/r/PussyPass15/09/21 02:21 AM
47

Thirsty men are what legitimizes this woman. If men weren’t so stupidly and desperately thirsty, she’d likely be working a service-level job at minimum wage. And who wants to bet that she’s not paying any taxes on that income?
/r/PussyPass14/09/21 05:15 PM
2

A beautiful example of the Apex Fallacy. Pretty well textbook, too.
/r/MensRights13/09/21 09:58 PM
9

Quite true; I was just taking the opposite extreme as a vibrant example. Most average dudes are practically invisible to most women. Which makes women’s complaint of “where have all the good men gone?” once these women hit their 30s deliciously ironic. These men are exactly where they left them - back in their 20s, friendzoned and ignored as potential mates as these women partied their youth and fertility away. These men have now moved on to greener pastures, and are unlikely to ever return.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/21 12:26 AM
1

Yes. Reproductive fraud, as well. For both genders, equally. As in, tie the hands of the judges so that they cannot just give women a slap on the wrist compared to men (sentences limited by average sentence across both genders - limited wiggle room), and make “paper abortions” available to the men with no statute of limitations.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 10:22 PM
6

Is this a honey badger, or a genuine female egalitarianist? As much as I would like to hope, pessimism and real-world experience do not bode well for the latter.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/09/21 03:57 AM
47

How likely a man is to be seen as “creepy” is directly proportional to how ineffective he is in giving women the tinglies. This is best seen in 50 Shades of Gray. Had Christian been an unemployed layabout in a four-decade-old double-wide mobile home, it would be an episode of Criminal Minds instead of a soft-core porno. The single largest aspect which turns the story from a horror movie into irresistible female spank material comes down to the № 1 thing that gives women the tinglies - obscene le…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/09/21 03:46 AM
10

Men’s only hotels? Where?? I mean, yes. Monasteries do exist. But those are for monks, not travellers.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/09/21 08:17 PM
3

The title sounds like a stroke in action.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 04:05 PM
11

The proposal drew criticism from women who asked, “Why would you give more resources to the most privileged group on campus,” The face of the Female Supremacy movement, people. If they cannot be the primary victim, no-one can be allowed to be.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 05:13 AM
4

I’d like to see this claim that nearly all men will step in to support a woman being abused. I wish that were the case and it’s nice that you believe that to be true. I don’t have to believe. I take reality for what it is, not what I want it to be. The male herd protects its own in the same way you’ve just described. When an immature man is rejected by a woman, it is only him that strikes back. He doesn’t have the automatic support and active engagement of the rest of his peer group to strike ba…
/r/MensRights03/09/21 11:22 PM
4

You can feel that way. But you’ve provided no data and you’re just saying things. You’re trolling a sub for male support, and you’re demanding this kind of data? looks around in confusion Or is this the first time you’ve ever touched a male advocacy sub in your life? Women make the first move all the time. 🤣🤣🤣🤣 god, you be hilarious. https://www.google.ca/search?q=why+are+men+still+expected+to+make+the+first+move Men making the first move is an ubiquitous expectation by women, to the degree that…
/r/MensRights03/09/21 10:31 PM
3

How was what I said in any way other than the absolute truth, especially for an average lower-80% guy? The number of times we are actively approached by any interested woman in our entire life can often be counted on one hand, and for a large minority of us, with no fingers at all. The only real way around this (to receive unsolicited attention and have the woman make the initial approach, as a lower-80% man) is to be either stupidly wealthy or famous. Your assumption of me “hating women” made y…
/r/MensRights03/09/21 09:29 PM
3

Nice ASSumption.
/r/MensRights03/09/21 09:20 PM
3

You know what? That’s ok. I don’t feel comfortable around women who aren’t related to me because of the zero barrier to entry, zero consequences, and massive damage potential of any false claim. Sure, #NotAllWomen, but you know what? I think that venerable feminist aphorism of three poisoned M&M’s in a bowl full of normal ones makes a most excellent example of why I’m not gonna give any woman any sort of a chance. What’s good for the gander is every bit as good for the goose.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/09/21 07:21 PM
2

Let women show interest first. While you will get the exceptionally rare one making the first move, the vast majority will never do so. They have so many simps in their DMs that they would never consider actually stepping out for anyone. It’s just so much easier for them to make the men jump through hoops like monkeys.
/r/MensRights03/09/21 02:28 PM
1

that was the eureka moment that most of them really want you for your money. A lovely quote from Trevor Noah: Remove sex from a relationship and you will discover that over 90% of ladies have nothing to offer in relationships Remove money from a relationship and you will discover that over 90% of ladies won’t see a reason to be in that relationship
/r/MensRights03/09/21 07:25 AM
0

men have to impress women and women just have to do nothing and choose Women don’t want to be in the race. They just want to wait at the finish line and f**k the winners. I think today's reality is that most modern men don't care about impressing women. Starting from approaching women and ending with dating. From an evolutionary standpoint, men value youth and reproductive exclusivity in a single woman. This was in order to have healthy and vigorous genetic progeny that they could be reasonably …
/r/MensRights03/09/21 07:21 AM
3

Oh, if only I had the spare money burning a hole in my offshore account to mount a legal challenge to this. Shit like this really pisses me off. If you’re going to have any pretence towards equality, how about actually employing equality??
/r/MensRights01/09/21 04:54 PM
4

To do anything is to be labelled a misogynist. Because holding women accountable for their decisions is misogyny. waves hello from BC
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/09/21 04:39 AM
9

bad bot
/r/MensRights29/08/21 01:13 AM
27

Maybe out of a desire for vengeance? Tonight in the news: water is wet.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 01:10 AM
2

At no stage have I denied the existence of female perpetrators That was not the point. more women experience domestic abuse than men. THAT is the blatantly bigoted and easily-disproven falsehood I wanted to correct. Because it is wrong, wrong, wrong. The truth of the matter is that there are more male victims than female victims of domestic violence, especially if you include all the little details that Feminism has brought under the umbrella of “domestic violence” in an attempt to enhance their…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/08/21 12:42 AM
7

Every government organisation in every country I've looked at shows that more women experience domestic abuse than men. I am sorry, but you are working from bad data. The preponderance of female abusers vs male abusers has been known since 1975. The reason why government data is telling you otherwise, is because the vast majority of these government organizations do not permit funding into research about male victims of DV (2). So from a pure research & reporting perspective, those stats remain …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/08/21 10:05 PM
4

I acknowledge that women are the primary victims of domestic abuse. No, they aren’t. If you include the full, highly-detailed list of “domestic violence” actions that feminism has promoted in order to self-victimize themselves with, and apply it to both sexes, equally, turns out that for non-reciprocal DV - where only one person is doing the “violence” - women are about 70% of the aggressors. Men are the aggressors in only about 30% of the cases. The only way to tilt this in women’s favour is to…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/08/21 05:26 PM
5

70%+ of domestic violence Of non-reciprocal DV. Be precise, otherwise others will do their best to de-legitimize the point we are trying to make. Overall, when including both non-reciprocal and reciprocal, women still account for about two-thirds of DV Perps, but in terms of DV where one partner does not fight back, it’s about 70% female-initiated.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/08/21 04:56 PM
22

Paper abortions give the man the same essential abortion rights as a woman does - it releases them from any obligations to the fetus on the agreement that they no longer make any claims on it. You cannot have equality without actually making the genders broadly equivalent. A paper abortion provides this ability to men.
/r/MensRights27/08/21 04:22 PM
5

Oh, I do something far, far worse than that. I just ignore them. That’s infinitely worse than any dirty name: it denies them the drama and attention that they crave.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/08/21 01:15 AM
1

Transactional loyalty isn’t loyalty to begin with, it’s barter. Transactions are barter. But whether you barter for loyalty or earn it, loyalty is still loyalty. I mean, when a company pays you significantly more than the going rate for a job in a particular industry, they may purchase your loyalty through that above-average wage; you are unlikely to jump ship for another company with the exact same job because they are unlikely to meet or exceed the compensation you are already receiving. But r…
/r/MensRights25/08/21 05:03 PM
1

I know I am not the best that every chick I’ve fucked has had and vice versa, doesn’t mean I regret it. Perhaps, but keep in mind: what you experienced is something that the vast majority of men will never be good enough to experience for themselves. You are already in a high enough value position for a girl to explicitly cheat on her boyfriend. Most guys out there would never have that kind of a pull without one or more significant alterations - some of which may be wholly unachievable - to who…
/r/MensRights25/08/21 04:49 PM
1

However she has made it clear that she wants them to be married first. She has never been big on marriage but it has become a condition to having a kid. In all honesty, surrogacy with a donated egg is probably the cheaper and more stable option for this guy. I mean, if he really, really wants children. And provided he does his research carefully, and chooses the right country and an experienced surrogate with a verified history, it can be remarkably cost-effective.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 02:57 AM
7

I'll never marry again without a prenup. You showed your wisdom in the first half. Then in the second half you showed you haven’t yet learned the full lesson. Courts can and will throw out any prenup on the flimsiest of pretenses. It quite literally isn’t worth the paper it’s written on, regardless of how reasonably, rationally, and equitably it’s written. It’s best to adopt just the first half of your statement as an entire manifesto in of itself, and drop the second half.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 01:29 AM
2

I had one girl texting her boyfriend that they were an "amazing team" right after I had finished fucking her for a few hours in ways that the guy will never know. She even showed me the texts. On the one hand, if we could package up male-experience memories like yours (and many, many more) and beam it into the mind of every post-14yo guy out there (to let them experience this exactly as you did), it would pre-emptively neuter so much grief and torment that men experience, by helping them avoid t…
/r/MensRights25/08/21 01:24 AM
9

family court judges are constantly shifting the goalposts on what constitutes a marriage. British Columbia law has it down to one year of cohabitation, which doesn’t even have to be continuous. Although that is pretty extreme - AFAIK few judges will implement such rules without significant evidence that the man intended to wife up the woman, such as paying off her debts or allowing her to live with him completely free of charge (no payment towards living expenses, etc.). But yes. It is accelerat…
/r/MensRights25/08/21 01:13 AM
4

I thought patriarchy was strong in India. It both is and it isn’t. Some things, like spousal rape, isn’t yet a crime. A significant minority of men also feel no problem or fear about raping unaccompanied women. Gang rapes are not uncommon over there, and many gang rapes see the women killed to avoid leaving a witness behind. But in many ways women enjoy far more privileges than men do. The ability to make a completely baseless accusation and have hordes of male simps descend upon your victim to …
/r/MensRights25/08/21 12:58 AM
2

Seeing how unfairly Johnny Depp was smacked down in court with his defamation lawsuit, I think it won’t be any time soon.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/08/21 11:49 PM
3

there seems to be a lot of men who are burdened with that though and who make bad decisions as a result. It is men who are the real romantics. It’s men who are the imaginative ones when it comes to romance, and all in an effort to provide a woman with the romantic experiences she says she wants. Men simp and worship at the pedestal of p***y because evolution has dictated it: we might be the gatekeepers of commitment, but women are the gatekeepers of reproduction. You can see it everywhere in nat…
/r/MensRights24/08/21 11:09 PM
2

That the average person cheats? If this is what you are getting, you are missing by a country mile.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 10:34 PM
3

For educated people there is naturally going to be a much smaller pool of "higher status" candidates. And this is literally what is being seen right now. Because women have a powerful impulse to date up, professional women who are high earners all compete for a vanishingly tiny proportion of high-earning men. Every time their own income increases, the pool of men that they consider “minimally sufficient” becomes even tinier. And because these men date down, they have the entire field of women be…
/r/MensRights24/08/21 10:33 PM
3

And men cheat more often than women Men over-report. Women under-report. It takes two to tango. The reality is likely that both genders cheat at about the same rates. and who are they cheating with, always poorer quality women? Women generally date up, to the point where it is seriously impacting professional women’s ability to find a mate. This would not be occurring if women dated down. Case in point, look at this quote from that article: “There are shortages of economically attractive men,” N…
/r/MensRights24/08/21 10:22 PM
3

There are many papers illustrating how and why men cheat as well. Look at who they cheat with, and you will find your answer. Women tend to cheat with other men who are superior to her own partner in some way, either via pay grade, job status, or social status. Which is why the old joke of the son looking like the village pastor is so prevelant - the pastor held the spiritual status in the village, and so was significantly higher in status than most everyone else short of the mayor and a handful…
/r/MensRights24/08/21 07:56 PM
3

This is one study 58 papers from almost as many researchers. Or didn’t you read the references? This subject is not controversial or disputed in the least. It is not evidence that women will “always” pick a “higher-status” mate. Pick? No. I never said that. Chase after? Most definitely. And that is the clear difference. Any person can pick superior candidates all day long, but that amounts to a hill of fuck-all until at least one of those other people pick them in return. It takes two to tango, …
/r/MensRights24/08/21 07:18 PM
5

Lie. There is no evidence of this in “science”. Ahem. You were saying?
/r/MensRights24/08/21 06:56 PM
3

Make up anything you want that sounds plausible because nobody's going to seriously kick the tires on it or try to experimentally reproduce it. When any criticism is seen as bigotry and misogyny, there will be one HELL of a problem right there. Researchers are going to be reluctant to do bullshit detection against anything that triggers a massive smear campaign against them, which could almost trivially destroy their careers and funding sources.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 04:51 PM
15

Men are far more loyal, in aggregate, than females are. I mean, how else are 80+% of all divorces initiated by women unless men are more loyal and committed to the relationship in progress? Yes, you do find loyal women. My wife is one of them. But female loyalty is, in general, transactional, not ego/pride-based as it is with men. Any transactional loyalty is invariably much more fragile and subject to external influences than internal ego/pride-based loyalty that is enshrined as a building bloc…
/r/MensRights24/08/21 04:46 PM
4

Science. Women have an impulse called hypergamy, which is always in search of a better provider. They can and will drop a well-established mate on the flimsiest of pretences if a noticeably superior option provides them an opportunity. This is a purely female impulse, men do not suffer from hypergamy in the least.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 02:54 PM
3

but you can't put it as absolutely as "the only thing that female educators can do is make it worse" as if there are no exceptions. On an individual level, sure. There will be exceptions. Outliers exist, and I have never denied that. On an aggregate level, across our civilization? Not so much. The proportion of educators who have been indoctrinated into feminism is an extreme majority, and will fight tooth-and-nail to uphold the “boys are privileged, and need to be punished for it” narrative. He…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/08/21 07:44 AM
14

if they acknowledge what men and boys go through. Many of them were indoctrinated into the feminist ideology in College and University. As such, acknowledging the problems that boys go through runs directly counter to the narrative that boys are “privileged”. As such, this will never happen without a full rip-and-replace of a majority of educators - men and women - with those that do not toe the feminist ideology. These educators will fight tooth-and-nail to uphold the narrative that boys are su…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/08/21 02:33 AM
15

Removed as rule 6 violation. No women were demonized in that post. It is a well-established fact that female educators treat boys like broken girls, and that boys suffer greatly from this. This occurs because female educators - many of whom have been raised on feminist ideals - either don’t understand male behaviour or even outright attempt to punish male behaviour to the point of explicitly suppressing their scholastic metrics, and as such, are contributing (if only in part) to the incel proble…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/08/21 02:23 AM
21

everything will go right as long as they behave respectfully towards girls That is Lie #1 with respect to Society’s Great Lie that they teach all young boys. This lie does nothing but highlight those sub-par “undesirable” men (who conform to it, and obey it), so that women can more effectively avoid them in order to pursue the truly high-value sociopaths and dark-triad men (who ignore it completely, or at most pay only lip service to it).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/08/21 11:34 PM
2

Marriage contracts should make a comeback Why? It’s already a ridiculously fraudulent contract, with all the benefits on the woman’s side. How are we possibly supposed to rectify the man’s contractual benefit from marriage (reproductive ownership, and exclusive custody of all offspring), when the last 170 years have been dedicated to taking those benefits away from him? There is quite literally nothing left for any man to benefit from in terms of marriage. What would you propose to provide that …
/r/MensRights21/08/21 04:46 AM
4

Words miscommunicated, social rule intricacies stepped on, her social circles influencing yours, risk risk risk risk risk For what? FOR WHAT? 30-45 min of mutual enjoyment that is potentially life ending because you're not omniscient enough for whatever court/public opinion/boss at your job? Five years ago I would have considered this thought patently ridiculous, but not anymore: MGTOW is right. Eschew all entanglements. Just walk away. Stop thinking with your little head, stop being a simp, sto…
/r/MensRights20/08/21 05:10 PM
2

I don't think the Justice system has properly considered the issue of subjective feeling changes. This would prove to be a boon to anyone wanting to get out from any other sort of contract, agreement, or exchange. Don’t like your car loan? Feeling stressed from those bi-weekly payments? Your feeling changed about the car, so have the entire agreement thrown out! And because they continued to charge you for the car without your consent, they get to pay damages! Now rinse-and-repeat for pretty wel…
/r/MensRights20/08/21 04:53 PM
2

So, correct me if I am wrong: Through clear and unambiguous communication, and based upon that communication, Bauer goes into that situation with certain expectations… which the woman violates by claiming that what she explicitly asked for and subsequently received constituted sexual assault. What. The. Fucking. Hell??
/r/MensRights20/08/21 04:47 PM
13

And then there was the White Feather campaign in WWI… that was one hell of an anti-male chucklefest.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/08/21 03:55 PM
43

Except… feminism was never about equality. The clue is in the name.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/08/21 03:42 AM
32

I hate to admit it, but the more I look into it, the more I see MGTOW as being 100% correct… time to invest in 24/7 bodycams, men. It’s your only option to “prove” your innocence. Remember: men are guilty until proven innocent… no evidence required, and often in spite of evidence that could exonerate you.
/r/PussyPass15/08/21 09:34 PM
15

If those preferences cause them to end up alone, then as a man I fail to see why that's a ME problem. That is precisely the correct answer. Unfortunately, female supremacy and other male simps will do everything in their power to make it your problem. As a single man, women will do everything in their power to shame you for not making more, for not being a better wage earner. I see it very likely that they will also push for laws that either screw with your income (a bachelor tax) or restrict yo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/08/21 02:01 AM
1

I think we need to reconcile our cultural double standard over how sexual objectification of women is bad, but financial objectification of women is "just a preference." We have no problem hammering into boys from the day they can speak that women are not just body parts. Are we willing to do the same for girls, and lecture them early and often about how men are not just bank accounts? Except that women marrying up is not a cultural artifact. It is an evolutionary one. As such, it is embedded in…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/08/21 01:54 AM
8

I'm not discussing child support/child rearing hypotheticals. Staying clear of that mine field, no? Good. Because the courts generally don’t care what the child support is spent on. You could be going to spas and hair salons every week for all they care, as long as the children are adequately clothed and fed. Some mothers do indeed use it to take care of their children. Others, not so much. And no-one enforces the “for the children” aspect of child support, either. If a parent had to produce val…
/r/MensRights11/08/21 12:21 AM
4

Never getting married Going your own way, eh? Good for you. That philosophy has never needed to recruit, they just welcome men as they walk up to the door. In fact, the wrongspeak has gotten so widespread that Reddit recently banned those subs, on the basis that bigotry and sexism is a-ok when directed against the “ideologically correct” people.
/r/MensRights11/08/21 12:15 AM
3

It’s intentional guilt by association. Not by Google, but by female supremacist orgs who want to discredit men’s rights. You see, you can very much be a men’s rights activist, be dedicated to true equality, and yet still have absolutely no connection or knowledge of anything outside of men’s rights, such as female nature (core RP, not PUA). Yet the female supremacists will roll up men’s rights into what they call “the manosphere” which includes not only MGTOW, Red Pill, and PUA, but also incels.…
/r/MensRights09/08/21 05:06 AM
6

How sad that it really be like that.
/r/MensRights08/08/21 06:47 AM
5

Laws unfair to men came about starting in the early 1970's. Try the 1860s, when the courts broke the most important tenet of the marriage contract - that the offspring produced in the marriage were the property of the man. After that point, the entire contract began to become more increasingly and unfairly lopsided with every decade. These days, most any marriage is a deeply negative-sum proposition for any man, at least from a legal perspective.
/r/MensRights08/08/21 06:47 AM
7

The same “evidence” that they use to claim that most assaults go unpunished can just as easily be used to show that most claims are false ones. The reality is likely somewhere in between.
/r/MensRights07/08/21 07:26 PM
6

Feminism is a female supremacy movement, plain and simple. Any assistance or improvement it provides men is invariably incidental, as a knock-down effect arising from putting women’s needs first; it never considers men’s improvements in the absence of any material improvement in women’s needs. I mean, feminism never was about true equality - the clue is in the name.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/21 08:49 PM
2

The 'we're leftist but not those kinds of leftists' crowd is basically center/center right at best. American overton window is just wacky. Flip that script, and it could be argued that all conservatives are economically/financially illiterate racist bigots by default. The spectrum of societal sociopolitics is much wider than actual political representation in America. Very few politicians are left of centre, and Bernie is really just a moderate center-left activist. Those who are left of centre …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/21 04:47 AM
4

This....this isn't really a leftist sub is it? The name of the sub says it all: left-wing, and not leftist. Left wing is on or to the left. Leftist is to the far left, where the sociopolitical horseshoe curves around and meets up with the insanity of the alt-right.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/05/21 11:50 PM
0

I don’t really blame women for engaging in hypergamy when they have that move available to them for the same reason I don’t blame rich people for buying nice things, in both cases, these are the cards they hold in their hand, and everybody is trying to live their best life, so why not play them. The problem arises with equivalent and fair exchange. A rich person exchanges money for goods. They have to provide a bit of their wealth in order to obtain those rich-people toys. On the other hand, the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/05/21 11:36 PM
2

This is the far left end of the Socio-political horseshoe, and it is every bit as repugnant, odious and cancerous as the alt-right. Not saying that the moderate middle is better, but there has always been a distinct lack of anti-reality extremists here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/05/21 11:17 PM
2

Welcome to feminist ideology, where logic, reason, and real-world evidence have no ground to stand on.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/05/21 11:14 PM
1

You’re so wide of the mark that you aren’t even on the same planet. The only reason why your assumptions are even in effect at all is because of an imposed societal restriction: monogamy. Without monogamy (as in, with legally-recognized polygamy available), your excuses for women break down dramatically. Simply put, a clear majority (about 80%, as discovered by science) would rather share a high-value man (within the top-20% of men, and usually the top-5%) with other women than suffer being in a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/21 06:56 PM
0

I’m doing my best to stick to the facts. Apologies if I’m getting too close to the edge, but uncomfortable facts tend to do this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/21 08:47 PM
11

The last study I saw, involving double-blind research in a private environment that encouraged women to not under-report promiscuity, researchers discovered that over 80% of women would gladly share a high-value man (the top-20% of men) in a polygamous marriage with other women, than suffer monogamy with a lower-quality man (the other 80% of men). This wasn’t even the primary research - this just popped out of the numbers organically. Genetic studies have backed this up - prior to the invention …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/21 08:24 PM
8

a lot of women start to realize how desperate men are so their standards skyrocket. Or maybe I'm just coping. No, you are correct. And it isn’t college, specifically, although that certainly contributes. The primary force behind this is social media, where a man is competing not just against a woman’s immediately-available offline social network, but also the world+dog online environment, where she can get validation from the other ≈2 Billion men who are online. Trust me, that’s a massive contri…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/21 08:00 PM
3

Evidence is mounting that women naturally gravitate to the Pareto principle with regards to men - whereby at least 80% of women will gladly polygamously share a top-tier man who is a part of the upper 20% of men, than suffer a lesser quality man in monogamy. History also bears this out, in that prior to society’s invention and enforcement of monogamous marriages, 19 women contributed to the gene pool for every man that did so.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/21 07:52 PM
9

That’s now (2020) about 50%, AFAIR. The damning bit? It’s sub-20% for women in that same age bracket. There are a tiny handful of men being chosen by a majority of women. It’s the 80/20 rule, IRL. Downside is that monogamy is still the state of marriages - we haven’t legalized polygamy. At some point most of these women will be forced to choose a clearly inferior man to marry, or stay a single mother. And most men will have to suffer women who have settled with them not out of true desire, but s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/21 07:46 PM
10

Women will judge you for being a virgin because it speaks to pre-selection by other women. This is why the best way to score with any woman is to be seen with women: women see other women’s acceptance of your presence as a sign that you are desirable to other women, and therefore you are seen as a man of some non-trivial value. This becomes more frictionless the more intimate the association becomes, which is why playboys and risky/dangerous/exciting men have almost no difficulty finding bed par…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/21 07:15 PM
4

This was very well written. Thank you. I might not have your issues, but condom use for me is equally as stimulating as using a strap-on in place of my penis. As in, it’s a non-starter.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/03/21 10:51 PM
8

This comes because we put women on a pedestal. It goes to their heads, literally. Being worshipped and having things done for you purely because you’re female from puberty on up affects the personality of a person deeply, and allows them to fall into habits and though patterns that society would have otherwise never tolerated. It can be seen most starkly in the maxim, “happy wife, happy life.” It is expected that men make their wives happy by any means possible, including precise obedience to he…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/03/21 11:43 AM
3

That is why MGTOW is scarring the shit out of society. The more men that drop out of this game, the worse it gets for everybody... I am ineligible for that particular club, as I violate one of the foundational requirements (I’m married), but having observed a number of other relationships and women in my life I often spout much the same advice. And holy shit… the hate I get in response, even from other guys, is a beautiful example of the Sunk Cost fallacy in action.
/r/MGTOW221/01/21 01:26 AM
9

Not even. It’s closer to the 90/10 ratio.
/r/MGTOW221/01/21 01:23 AM
2

What is parasite class? The 1%, or to be more accurate, the 0.01%.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/01/21 08:25 AM
5

Conservatism works a lot like this, too, except it’s more the Parasite Class swindling and hoodwinking poor white people into voting against their own best interests. I mean, just look at “trickle down economics” as exhibit A. It’s central dogma of a majority of conservative politicians, despite being roundly discredited and dramatically failing real-world implementations
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/21 10:57 PM
2

I find your opening comment strangely sarcastic, considering the subreddit’s theme.
/r/MGTOW218/01/21 01:34 AM
4

You may find that this becomes less and less important as you age, either because women focus more on your net worth (and so an improved career naturally pulls them in better), or because you just give less and less of a fuck as time goes on. I am in that latter group. I literally cannot give less of a fuck as to how attractive I look. In fact, I often go out of my way to be as invisible or unconventionally eccentric as possible, so as to deflect or outright kill any unwanted attention from wome…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/21 12:34 AM
2

Actual leftists (socialists / anarchists) are often called "alt left" nowadays. Huh. I have heard the term “far-leftist” almost exclusively, because people’s brains tend to break if you don’t complete “alt-” with “right”. Not that you’re wrong, only that I haven’t really seen “alt-left” in wider usage.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/11/20 09:25 PM
6

I would go so far to correct that with the term “far leftist”. I am a moderate leftist and I have absolutely no problem pointing out SJW bullshit. IMHO, the only reason why most other moderate leftists have fallen in line behind the extremists is because they simply don’t know any better. No-one has ever provided them with the other side of the story, or has even hinted that there is other data out there. Many are just too busy with their lives as wage slaves to critically research everything th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/11/20 04:44 PM
2

It’s hidden, because the person he replied to has been downvoted to beneath the threshold for displaying her post. And her post is a reply to someone else anyhow.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/11/20 06:34 PM
7

We'll dress however we like, men will learn not to stare. Oh, this one actually has a much deeper meaning, in that “you will learn not to stare.” Women still want certain men to stare, which is why they dress like that. It’s explicit, and very, very intentional. It’s just not done for you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/11/20 06:48 PM
2

to groups like white knights. I would even say there are two main sub-groups: men who are merely brainwashed into leaping to women’s defense for anything that a woman might object to or be threatened with, just without actually expecting any boon in return men who do so in order to appear or to be seen as more virtuous to women, so as to gain a boon of their attention or affections. Of the two, the former infantilizes women and is more dangerous to other men (social or physical retribution for s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/20 09:56 PM
4

a young man who has no romantic life and no prospect of having one can be angry. That anger comes from somewhere. It doesn’t spring out of nowhere, it is very much a product of society’s unintended consequences, and wouldn’t exist in the first place at the levels that it does without those unintended consequences.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/20 08:24 PM
6

perhaps it would be more helpful to treat them with empathy. There are those of us that do, even though we aren’t them ourselves. Because had things gone a little differently in my life, I could have easily become one of them. So I am rather sensitive to something I could have been, and I have taken the time to properly understand the underlying conditions that allow those outcomes to exist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/20 08:22 PM
7

The Pareto Principle is sharpening the hockey stick.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/20 03:21 AM
6

The only change I would make would be on slide No. 8: “to a proven bias against female students?” Remember, you need to put the reader into a specific frame of mind before flipping the script on them. So far it has been a premise of against female students, so you need to continue this theme before you pull the rug out from under the reader.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/11/20 10:39 PM
6

Racism can and does go in every direction, and sexism can and does go in every direction. With that said, the laws do predominantly focus on the poor and male and non-white, so there is a disproportionately biased issue there in the first place.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/11/20 10:02 PM
10

#QuestionsThatViolateTheSocietalNarrative
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/11/20 08:29 PM
1

I honestly wish I was gay at this point. I found my own unicorn a quarter-century ago. Her kind was vanishingly rare at that time, and I can see that they’re functionally extinct by now. They still exist, yes, but you have a better chance of winning the Powerball ten times in a row. With that said, I have eyes with which to see the current landscape, and a thinking mind with which to rationally analyze it. Were I to be widowed, I would sooner go gay - even as a Kinsey zero - than step foot back …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/20 11:23 PM
2

The solitude doesn’t mean you don’t have bros. But being comfortable and self-fulfilled in complete solitude means that you have mostly or completely switched away from external validation to internal validation, meaning that your own happiness and self-worth is not dependent on anyone else. It arises organically from within yourself, from your own experiences and achievements and state of being. That you can be fulfilled and happy with only yourself; and not that you need to be by yourself in o…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/20 11:17 PM
2

Nobody, man or woman, wants to be with this kind of person. You kidding? You know just how many white knights are looking for their damsel in distress? Now granted, a permanent condition would certainly be a turn-off. But finding that ugly duckling and nurturing her into a swan? It’s many men’s best wet dream from an instinctual provider and protector position. Especially so if that swan decides to repay the favour and remain with him, thereby satisfying the “equivalent exchange” bullshit that s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/20 11:07 PM
1

Anytime they are trying to get you to be vulnerable or shit like that is just a massive shit test. Bingo. And shit tests are used to separate out the weak, undeserving men from the strong, valuable men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/20 09:27 PM
5

I would add: the edifice of modern relationships is rotten to the core. It is an anti-male playing field that is tilted severely against you. Your best chance for your mental health, emotional health, and financial health is to just walk away. To focus on yourself, to put yourself first, to be satisfied with only yourself and in your solitude. To become internally motivated such that any external connection is no longer a necessity, but becomes a value added proposition. It is only when you can …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/20 08:55 PM
4

my value as a man is directly dependant on what I can provide for them Oh, yeah. This is the message that society, and in general, women, sends. ''Oh most girls may not like guys like you yet, but when they get more mature they'll look for someone stable who can take care of her and her kids'' Translation: once she’s fucked Chad all through her 20s and popped out a few of his kids, she’ll “settle” for a man who will actually stick around instead of bouncing the next morning. You’re a compromise,…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/20 08:47 PM
15

almost 40% of traffickers worldwide are women. Clearly, human traffickers are seeing some really positive gender equality in that field! /s
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/20 11:27 PM
2

If everyone said, “I have mental issues” you’d be off the hook for a lot of things. If women say, “I have mental issues”, everyone would be falling over themselves to help her. She - from what I can tell - never claimed to have mental issues. This was suggested by the court: The defence wasn’t able to link the crime to any sort of mental health issues, but the bizarre nature of the offence led the Crown, defence and judge to agree it was just too strange to be blamed simply on booze — and left t…
/r/PussyPass17/04/20 02:11 AM
26

Both this bitch and ''judge'' need to be shot and killed. No. Very, very few people on this planet deserve death. And no-one was killed in this incident. However, this Judge does need to be de-robed for blatant failure to uphold a halfway decent sentence, and the woman needs to be put back onto that 40-month term. Seriously, 3⅓ years is not a large sentence for trying to steal a baby at knifepoint. If this had been a man, he would have probably gotten 5-10 years.
/r/PussyPass08/04/20 05:11 AM
57

Because, 20 months for trying to abduct a baby really is nothing more than a slap on the wrist.
/r/PussyPass07/04/20 11:57 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter