| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | The Supreme Court officially rejected NCFM's petition to review the Selective service law.That's really great news that you told them about this information and that they are discussing their next steps on this big issue! Hopefully the NCFM will continue to fight against the sexist all male automatic draft registration and i wish you and the NCFM the best of luck in taking on the all male draft!! | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 26/06/26 02:01 AM |
| 2 | The Supreme Court officially rejected NCFM's petition to review the Selective service law.You're correct that Valame did use the 5th amendment as a secondary argument in his lawsuit but the federal court unfortunately denied it by using the excuse that the federal court not being able to overturn Rostker. Also with them also rejecting the ERA claim it led to the supreme court using that as an excuse to deny the case by letting the appeals court ruling stay put. We also have to acknowledge that the supreme court is ruled by sexist conservatives which plays a big role in what cases get… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 26/06/26 01:56 AM |
| 1 | The Supreme Court officially rejected NCFM's petition to review the Selective service law.Yes i am well aware of the Valame case as i was also following that case too just like i was following the NCFM case to see if anything would come of this case. Although in the Valame case i was almost certain it would unfortunately be rejected you are correct that Valame definitely had Standing since he lost a federal job offer for not being registered for the sexist all male draft however that was not the reason they declined to hear his case. The reason why the supreme court declined to hear … | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 25/06/26 03:29 PM |
| 2 | The Supreme Court officially rejected NCFM's petition to review the Selective service law.Yes The NCFM should have definitely done that before even filing the lawsuit!! If you look back at the October court hearing last year with Nadine Lewis in the 9th district court of appeals the judges were all very persistent about the lack of injury since all the plaintiffs were already registered. Although Nadine Lewis rightfully tried to argue that even though the men in the plaintiff were already registered there was still injury in the law since the law requires men to notify the system eve… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 09/06/26 01:02 AM |
| 3 | The Supreme Court officially rejected NCFM's petition to review the Selective service law.No problem!! There have been many complaints against the automatic registration from prominent privacy groups like the Electronic privacy information center(EPIC) which could help since they can potentially be willing to file amicus briefs on a new NCFM case if the NCFM decide to file a brand new lawsuit against the automatic registration. I found a link if you want to read about it and or show the NCFM some of the complaints they have made about automatic registration! https://epic.org/epic-coa… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 09/06/26 12:24 AM |
| 4 | The Supreme Court officially rejected NCFM's petition to review the Selective service law.That's actually really great that you are a member of the NCFM! You should really try to talk to them as soon as possible to discuss the next steps such as finding a plaintiff that is not registered for the NCFM can either refile before the deadline ends for the supreme court case or to refile one as soon as possible to get it to a federal judge to order a stay(pause) on the automatic registration! The good thing is the NCFM is based in California with more liberal judges which makes it easier t… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 08/06/26 11:31 PM |
| 3 | The Supreme Court officially rejected NCFM's petition to review the Selective service law.Although the men that were plaintiffs in the 2021 were registered just like the men that are plaintiffs in the current lawsuit, the biggest difference was that the appeals court did not rule that there was no harm to them in the 2021 like they did in the current case! In the 2021 case there justification the supreme court gave was because they wanted to give congress more time and in the current case they most likely rejected it because of the 9th district ruling that the men had no standing inj… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 08/06/26 11:09 PM |
| 3 | The Supreme Court officially rejected NCFM's petition to review the Selective service law.Yes i can elaborate on a pre-enforcement lawsuit. A pre-enforcement challenge is a lawsuit that is brought up to stop or challenge a law before it is enforced. Since automatic registration still has not kicked off it gives the NCFM the perfect opportunity to file one against the upcoming automatic registration since it will discriminate against men by pulling the information of men and only men from data bases without their consent and without the ability to conscientiously object like men can n… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 08/06/26 10:52 PM |
| 3 | The Supreme Court officially rejected NCFM's petition to review the Selective service law.They can just keep the lawyer they have now Nadine Lewis since she is a good lawyer rather then finding one. In regards to filing a discrimination lawsuit it is not hard to file one but i do agree that the hardest part is finding plaintiffs which is why they need to start looking right now!! Aside from the sexism the supreme court showed today another reason why i believe the supreme court declined to hear the case was because of the ruling back in December by the 9th district court of appeals w… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 08/06/26 10:26 PM |
| 8 | The Supreme Court officially rejected NCFM's petition to review the Selective service law.This is absolutely bumming to hear!! The NCFM should not give up on this big issue!! If i were the NCFM i would file another lawsuit ASAP but this time against the discriminatory automatic registration that is set to kick off in December! If they file what's called a pre-enforcement lawsuit against automatic registration the lawsuit doesn't have to go all the way to the supreme court for there to be some action regarding automatic registration since federal judges have the power to be able to fr… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 08/06/26 09:11 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter