TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ThulsaDoomer Archive

View 1 post and 118 comments by ThulsaDoomer on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

A scientific study on it. And science does not cope. Every other race is at a significant disadvantage when it comes to dating compared to the Western white men. But Asians are particularly disadvantaged. Every time I've known a couple where a white woman was with an Asian guy, she always had some Asian fetish.
/r/BlackPillScience02/03/26 10:12 AM
–

I understand what you mean, OP. I think it depends on how bad someone is though. If some is very handsome and a woman really, really wants him, then, in my opinion, she will tolerate average sex from the guy, and may even lie to her friends to say how happy she is. If the guy is just terrible at it, she will try everything to help him, but there is a high chance that she will move on, if nothing improves. On the other hand, how does someone who she is not attracted to even prove to her that he i…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 08:11 PM
5

Your face determining how you are perceived goes beyond women or men. It affects both genders in all areas of life. Personal life, career, everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 06:53 PM
21

Not men. Males. In all species. Women or females are the gene selection (specialists) bio-machines. And the males are the gene spreader (generalists) bio-machines. Women should be disposable to men, like the lawnmower man trying to find the exit into the Internet, one denies? Try the next, and next, and next, until you spread your genes. Women on the other have to pick one and only one specimen, with the most suitable genes. You know, body count mattering for women and being irrelevant for men i…
/r/BlackPillScience26/01/26 04:10 PM
2

> Procreation is a complex high stakes manufacturing process with an unavoidably high failure rate. In the ancient era, you simply might not make it out of infancy. Then all that would be left is the "successful" ones that pass the QC check. Or the chad may not make it. And the sub5 passes the genes.
/r/BlackPillScience26/01/26 04:03 PM
15

It's not his hoodie, or his profile, or his snakes. He is just simply off putting. Put that hoodie on young Brad Pitt and watch it being used as ice breakers and jokes. And the snakes would have been used as a segue into talking about his snake by women. He just looks off putting. He is not text book ugly, with obvious ugly features, but just not pleasantly put together. He has very rounded, child like features. Looks like a grown Haley Joel Osment, who was cute as a little kid, but for a grown …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 03:51 PM
1

Is that not what the gist of the redpill is?
/r/ExRedPill30/10/25 08:20 AM
3

It's emotional intelligence in terms of being able to out manipulate, or gaslight, or some other trickery. All that usually applies to men they are not very attracted to or settled for. The moment a chad shows up though, the most seemingly emotionality intelligent woman can turn into a child and all the red flags are ignored. I think looks trigger some special gene that overrides thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 06:18 AM
1

There is casual sex and there is stranger sex. Casual sex is when they are already familiar with the person, so they are more or less comfortable. Casual sex happens a lot in the offices. Get an attractive guy in the office, give him 6 months of familiarity, once he's vetted that he's ok he'll be banging all the office girls.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 08:03 AM
5

And women would let themselves do the most dirtiest things with these men as well Meanwhile to her future betabuxx husband: "Bill, I never! How do you even suggest that, it's so dirty, we can't do that".
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 07:56 AM
5

I am the only real hardcore IT guy, the others were consultants/project managers at that time If course! Easy life for chads in the upper middle management.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 07:53 AM
2

*Western white.
/r/BlackPillScience05/08/25 06:04 PM
6

Precisely why body count does not matter for most women, but matters a lot for men.
/r/BlackPillScience05/08/25 03:02 PM
2

Guppy Love. An interesting article on the topic.
/r/BlackPillScience05/08/25 02:58 PM
0

inspire The word you're looking for is: Elicit And I agree with your statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 07:05 AM
2

You will know, because you will be told. You will get signals, and if you won't understand them, you'll be asked out. Women will make it blatantly obvious they like you. They as aggressive as men are when it's someone they like.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 07:26 AM
2

If you get pushy and you are not attractive, you will get into a serious trouble nowadays. They may be pushy, but women allow it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/25 03:52 PM
1

It's not the fact that they are misogynist that nets them more results. It's the fact that they must have the good looks. Misoginy is just the byproduct of them not caring because they still get results as they have the looks. And women overlook the misoginy themselves because the guy has the looks. Being a "nice guy" is also a strategy by guys who don't really have the looks. It all boils down to the looks, they influence the behaviour.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/25 03:51 PM
1

I agree, if it goes against core biology, no amount of artificial conditioning will work. The only thing that truly works is when the world changes, and human beings need to adapt for survival. That changes preferences, temporarily, but only for survival. Given that survival is not an issue, you get what it is today. This is the same reason that for example, public shaming of really attractive people does not work. It is only an advertisement for them. Core biology takes over.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 05:50 PM
0

That said, there is enough variety in physical standards (if that is what the OP is talking about) that while some preferences are more common, there is enough diversity and preference that society should not be attempting to redefine what is and isn't attractive. Not when the world is globalised, and there are no borders anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 02:58 PM
1

Well fed signalled health and resources, and hence a higher chance of survival.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 02:56 PM
1

You most definitely can. An American woman once told me 5'11 was short for a man. Now I come from a country of short men and that sounded insane to me. 5'6ish is normalised here and I think the average American women would think that's not attractive. It is normalised because those are the options that are available. Mix people up and add enough tall options and it will become the preference.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 02:55 PM
1

You said beauty standards are influenced by society, then listed evolutionary biology examples. It all stems from evolutionary biology. Existence is about survival.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 02:53 PM
2

First of all, women keep each other down by raising each other's standards to the point where they turn everyone down. Next, exactly like you mentioned at the end there, women have low standards, but the assumption is that the guy already meets high standards in the looks criteria, then low (basic) behavioural standards apply on top of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 06:42 AM
1

That depends. Men have a much wider spectrum of replaceability. Average and below average men are more replaceable than average women. But when it comes to top men, and top women, top women are way more easily replaceable. It's all about what's more rare. Top men are more rare because they have to hit so many points. Top women are still judged pretty much for their looks, so they have a lower ceiling. Below average women are more replaceable than average and below average men.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 09:22 PM
19

She can't just own it. Women's whole identity, their existence is tied to being attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 04:19 PM
1

The technology is what stops it. It changed the world. What stops the society from going to their local car dealership, picking out the car, shaking the car salesman's hand and driving out of the lot with a new car, like in the 1950s?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 04:17 PM
2

So, you've never been on dating apps?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 12:48 PM
1

I've never claimed dating was easy, for anyone. Dating isn't easy. But getting dates is much easier for women. More chance of finding someone when you get endless retries.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 03:15 PM
1

Technology - This has enabled it all. If tomorrow we were hit by some global electric outage, suddenly all the empowerment and independence would disappear. The advent of automation, convenience, global communication, global trade, global world that is easy to survive in; the iPhone and the dating app, which I think really tipped the scale. Economic independence - Women are given better opportunities and a career push. They don't need to be in some relationship they want to be in anymore just to…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 07:56 AM
2

I don't think it's as much as men are tired with the games as much as men know what the spread is, and don't want to take risks. I think what happened is: Because of the iPhone, online dating, and the modern connected, convenient world that is much easier and safer to live in, the sexual market has shifted. It's not new, but the modern technology has really turbo charged it. As a consequence, men got educated and got broken out of the Bluepill view of the world. Nowadays women go through college…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/25 07:25 PM
3

It comes from nature. Men are gene spreaders, women are gene selectors. Men are generalists, women are specialists. Experience and high body count is valued by women. They would rather have a guy like that, than someone who is inexperienced and cannot lead. Experience and high body count means the man is valuable and highly desired. He must have good genes. With women it's the opposite. Men are disgusted by women who have a high body count. A man would rather have a virgin than a woman who is ve…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 06:42 PM
3

It's not prioritization. It's the feeling of being valued. If you had sex with some guy on the second date, and this guy has to complete quests for you to have sex with him, then obviously he is less valued. It is up to him though whether he wants to go through with it and simply move along.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 11:49 AM
1

This is it. The way many men think is the moment she over takes you, you lose control and power, and the countdown begins. It's probably both, a self-fulfilling prophecy because men change their behaviour and women start to act differently too. All it takes is one off hand comment and it spirals out of control. That's how it is in traditional relationships. It works in some rare cases though. I think it's when the relationship starts out that way where the woman is more successful, so she is a p…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 11:44 AM
3

This is a good answer. You can choose not to lie, of course, and you will get filtered out immediately. Your history (patterns) matter a lot in all aspects of life because they predict future behaviour.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 11:29 AM
1

It's not necessarily the actual physical violence. It is the implication of it. That's why height plays such an importance in attraction. It implies violence and dominance, it does not mean the actual person is violent. Being assertive and confident is much more nuanced than just being a criminal. Even amongst criminals there are bosses and leaders, right? It is actually a fascinating subject. I think it is more about perception, than action. A perception based on looks. A bad boy may not be a c…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 11:25 AM
–

Feminism nowadays is an identity, rather than ideology. Maybe it has always been that way. And I don't think it's "feminism" that is that way, it's just women are that way. Many women do not believe in it or understand its concepts, what a lot of them think is "Feminism = I am right, I am a victim; you are wrong, you are an oppressor". And they tend to pick and choose the parts that they like, and leave out the parts they dislike. When it suits them, women are just as strong, and as capable as m…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 11:04 AM
2

Will the guy who waited not be upset and feel less desired when he finds out that he had to wait and jump through the hoops, whereas she gave it up to some other guy on the second date? Especially nowadays when there is not much stigma about sex, so the most likely reason she is delaying it is to use it as a manipulation tool, or she is simply not attracted. It's dilemma for women too. Give it up too early, and you are easy. Make him wait, and he may think you are playing games, and walk.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 09:59 AM
1

That can turn against her if the guy becomes successful and gets more options, or she becomes too dependent on him. Instead of her controlling him, he can start controlling her.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 09:53 AM
1

Feminism gave women freedom, but also put double duty on them. Because now she has to work and look after her career and she also has to do the work at home and look after her kids, husband. And because ultimately it's women who choose the mate, she'll have to do it, if she wishes to keep her "prize". Women getting careers has also limited their choice, because the higher they go, the less options they have. It's good for men though because less of them are being fooled into marrying a person wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 01:30 AM
–

Being nice is attractive, when you are attractive. Being kind is attractive, when you are attractive. Being generous is attractive, when you are attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 08:12 PM
3

It depends on what the protagonist looks like. Books make one use their imagination, so they imagine some Fabio being the bad boy. Then it's OK.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 06:16 PM
2

It depends on what the protagonist looks like. Books make one use their imagination, so they imagine some Fabio being the bad boy. Then it's OK.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 06:16 PM
18

Don't think that happens anymore. It used to be a good strategy for women because they would be holding the power in the relationship. Women are independent now; they have their own money, houses, cars, and careers. If she's single in her 30s, she can easily have company any time she wants. Just order one from a dating app. And guys who get no attention are getting smarter too, thanks for the blackpill. They are much less willing to accept being settled down for, simply because it is very risky,…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 06:01 PM
1

Here is an illustration for you
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 06:01 PM
3

The point of a hobby is not to do it in order to get something. X > Y, to get to Z. It's to enjoy the hobby itself. People who have hobbies, don't need to be told to get a hobby. And if somebody gets into a hobby for ulterior motives, that hobby won't last too long. Just like I gave up on wall climbing as soon as I realized there were no women at the top of the ceiling.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/25 07:33 PM
1

Yes, a chad. Women have always been the chooser. After all, they are the DNA selection bio machine. If women make poor choices, humanity does not survive. But nowadays, with modern dating app sifting, they really have a choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/25 09:57 PM
4

Why is there always an assumption that women want commitment? It's used as some sort of a gotcha. "You got the advantage, BUT!... " If she wants commitment and family that time is in her 30s. Once she hits 40s, if she is good looking and has a good career, she can really have fun. She can be out every weekend and there won't be a shortage of young guys wanting to have fun.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/25 09:34 PM
8

Bingo! They want equality with men they do not find attractive. They are a competition. When it comes to searching for a partner, they always look for the one who is better than themselves in virtually every category; physically, financially, socially, spiritually. Women always look up. This is precisely why the more successful a woman becomes, the less options she has. It's like self elimination without realizing it, it is quite fascinating. You watch those girls get encouraged and do really we…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/25 07:46 PM
1

Men and women are very similar. The difference is being in the position of demand, which women are in most of the time. The moment a handsome guy shows up, and the dynamic shifts, women act exactly like the horn dogs they condemn.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/24 01:08 AM
1

What does "pulling his own weight" mean? Can you list your expectations?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/24 07:21 PM
5

Go to YouTube and search for countless "What's your body count" videos. There are also so many threads on Reddit with women casually mentioning that they have been on hundreds of dates in a year. Women get endlessly more matches than men do. Are you going to argue against that? There is no chance that a lot of those dates do not end up as an intercorse. Here is a survey. That is with knowing that women under-report their body count. Finally, I know real life examples of women who went on a date …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 11:35 PM
1

Where does the notion that men are helpless cavemen buffoons that need constant caring come from? Real life is not not a sitcom. Compare an average woman's car to an average man's car. Women's cars are a mess. The same with rooms. Ask a janitor whose toilet would they rather clean.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 09:55 PM
1

All I am saying is that the more men move up, the more options they get. The more women move up, the less options they get. That is all. We can debate what factors into all of that, but I would rather concentrate on the facts. I know many, many successful women who have nobody, because they simply want somebody above them. And those above them, may get somebody prettier and fitter.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 09:52 PM
1

> So doesn’t this mean men naturally want someone superior to them to submit to also? Since they want someone “curvier, fuller head of hair, more in touch with their emotions, more nurturing, better at maintaining social networks”? Not submit to. But to lead, protect, help, guard. > No, men who work hard to improve their lives generally don’t want loser women and will want someone closer to himself just like women do. Or do you seriously think tall, attractive, successful men are dating women wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 09:28 PM
0

High standard is a constant. "Better than themselves" is relative.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 09:10 PM
0

Submissive does not mean weak, helpless, or stupid. What do you think about the saying "Behind every successful man, there is a strong woman"? I am generalizing here, but I think generalization can is the rule, in general. There is a reason why women want a taller man, taller than themselves. Because they want to someone who will take charge, they want to feel petite, protected, guarded, safe. They want a "hero". Nowadays that translates into earning power. You cannot wield an axe on the battlef…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 09:08 PM
4

Age old question. What does she bring? Other than the obvious.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 09:30 PM
1

In those arrangements the guy has to be out of her league in terms of looks. Also women care about what men do because if they are doing better, the guy may become dependent on them. You said it yourself: "As long as you don't depend on them".
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 09:29 PM
4

Yes, exactly, not more draining, meaning better! More competent, earning more, with more stable, better social status. Men accept women who are draining.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 09:03 PM
2

How does it make no sense? An ego has to be inflated somehow. It is inflated by men, who have no standards, who simp, date down, and pay women fo various services. Thus, giving them all the power of choice. And an inflated ego.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 08:45 PM
0

He is taller. Height is associated with competence, dominance, leadership, and higher social standing, which is often rewarded with higher earning power. If he is taller, she looks up to him literally and figuratively. And that's what they seek from men they deem as romantically viable.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 08:41 PM
1

A completely outdated tradition and an extremely unfavourable, one sided contract for men. What does a marriage give you? A little tax incentive, nothing else. But instead it brings the government into your home and it gives the woman a nuke button to destroy you at any moment. Nobody believes in marriage. "Till death do us apart" should be changed to "Till first inconvenience does us apart". Marriage does not guarantee non-infidelity. It does not stop people. It just makes separating very messi…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 08:34 PM
4

That woman who graduates with a degree, moves out alone, and enters a high earning career does not want a billionaire, which would be a high standard. She just wants someone to earns more. Not by much, but nonetheless, more. It is in a woman's nature to look up. That's how how it is. And her own success is what causes her lack of dating options.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 08:29 PM
1

I don't know the exact numbers, but women are catching up in height.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 08:26 PM
-1

Say currently I am driving a Ford Focus. I want a new car, I start looking at cars that are better than Ford Focus. That is not having high standards, it is just wanting something better than I currently have. If I had a Ford Focus and wanted nothing else than a McLaren or a Ferrari, then it would mean I have high standards. The problem is, currently, this Ford Focus that I have is a better car than what is available, and I don't want to downgrade. That's the situation now. Women do not want to …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 08:24 PM
-1

All men they compare, are by default above themselves. That's where the comparison starts from.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 08:14 PM
-1

The problem is all a lot of women nowadays are walking around with a grossly inflated idea of their own worth. Because men give them those options. How much is OnlyFans bringing in? Billions! Who is paying for it? Women?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 08:14 PM
3

Correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 08:13 PM
0

I don't know if 5'4" is correct anymore. In the US it must be the Latin demographic who are bringing down that number. In Europe women are tall and they are getting taller. 5'9" women are very common nowadays.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 08:12 PM
1

They all picked guys better than themselves. Those guys had options, they exercised those options.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 08:11 PM
1

So what's your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 08:10 PM
1

Being taller and better looking is literally, being better. It is one of the categories.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 08:09 PM
-3

It is often made out that women have crazy high standards, they don't. They just want someone higher than themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 08:05 PM
1

Being in that situation is worse than being in hell. Don't know why the guy would subject himself to it. The chad is also a scumbag for knowingly emotionally abusing the guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/24 09:31 PM
3

It's like telling a starving African they would get bored of eating BigMacs and it's nothing special, which is true, but having the option to eat a BigMac any time you want it is the difference. Personally, if I could eat BigMacs and not get fat, I would eat them all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/24 08:14 PM
4

This is a far bigger problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/24 07:55 AM
5

The only thing that matters are the properties that are constant and cannot be changed. Specifically, your physical looks. Can be changed. If she spots (or at least believes) that you are trying to improve your situation, she will overlook your living situation. Can be changed. In fact, if you have the base, she will help you by turning you into her project. She will go shopping with you and help you dress and groom. I agree with the rest of the points. However, the most important part is to pas…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/24 07:26 PM
2

Women absolutely compete, except they compete in a different way. Whereas men complete directly; on physical strength, size, success, money. Women compete by sabotaging each other. For example, they encourage promiscuity knowing full well that men care about it, thus lowering their competition's chances of being accepted. Or they inflate their competition's ego, where they think they are a 10/10, no one is good enough and turn down potentially good mates.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/24 07:19 PM
–

You are absolutely right. Confidence has to come from somewhere. Having options gives you confidence. Imagine you are selling a car, and you get buyers calling you, making offers. Of course you are going to be confident in what you are selling. Now imagine you are selling a car with high mileage, no one is calling, and you get one call. You will be chasing them up, calling back, etc. You will look desperate. There is a reason why you are getting lots of calls with one car though, and no calls wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/24 11:24 AM
–

Interesting. But if you were attractive in the first place, would you not be getting picked naturally and getting those scores? If you manipulate the algorithm and it shows you to those women that you may like. Are you sure they will be interested in you? Do you think the algrotihim hiding you from the world is the problem? Also, if the algorithm works the way you described, then if all the guys are swiping on all the women, does that not mean, they are raising scores for all women? Thus improvi…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 03:30 PM
–

Women are attracted by an experienced man, men are repulsed by an experienced woman. That is simply how it is in nature. Mention that you are virgin to a woman, and she will be disgusted and will most likely not sleep with you. Mention that you are a virgin to a man, and he will act like he just just struck gold. The whole reason communities like AWDSG work, is because women don't mind sharing a man. Those communities would never work for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 10:35 AM
–

Why spam profiles you have no interest in?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 10:31 AM
–

I agree with you completely. The key is that women, even if they can't lock down the chad, can still enjoy their company every weekend, if they want to. They are never alone. If she keeps herself fit, she can keep going all the way up to 60s. Chad is still a man, don't have standards and will go for an easy ride. The modern world suits women much more than it suits men. They get more education and career opportunities and push. But it also works against them, because you cannot change nature, wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 10:26 AM
–

Bingo! As an example, check this video out. Look at the disparity between men and women. Most of those guys have zero standards. This is why those "stand on the scale" videos are pointless, men don't care about women's weight. Those "prank" videos are there just to appeal to redpillers. Blame men, not women. Women are doing their part in gatekeeping very well, men are not.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 10:14 AM
–

Don't many matchmakers quit due to women having unrealistic standards and expectations?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 10:04 AM
–

Attraction is determined within milliseconds. Mate selection is one of the most important functions of a human. It has been honed for thousands of years. The moment you look at someone, you know immediately. It works for both men and women. You can never change that attraction. There is no such thing as winning someone over. The getting to know and being there is a code word for simping and the other party settling eventually once they either exhaust their options or decide to use you. That is a…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 05:43 PM
1

It has affected handsome men, and especially beautiful women very positively. I think all the influencers and aggregation channels taking over the social media have kinda killed. It is great and can change your life if you are beautiful, have talent, or go viral though.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/24 12:18 AM
2

They have no problem approaching, and showing interest actively with attractive men.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 01:38 PM
4

Women being socially weak is such a myth. Women are not afraid of anything. But it's advantageous to play into that stereotype.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 12:13 PM
1

30 is not death, but it is the sound of walls of death starting to close in. "30 is the new 20" is a complete lie. In fact, now more than ever it is important to get into a stable relationship early. In your 30s: The society puts on the pressure Your friends are getting married You have less energy You have less time (no, being a career person in your 20s will not give you more time in your 30s unless you strike it big) There is less choice There is more history There is more bitterness, attitud…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 04:42 PM
4

They absolutely are not. They just use it as a tool.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 04:24 PM
1

I think this is the most correct scenario. Women do not settle nowadays. They always look up, and the higher they go, the less choice there is. There is no stigma anymore, women are doing fine financially. If they are in a good shape, they can continue dating perpetually, forever. There is always a selection of you guys will to take them out and show them a good time.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 04:19 PM
0

Attraction builds through personality and interactions with men. It does not. Personality is so overrated and often dictated by looks. Also, if the whole relationship hangs on the personality, then it is very volatile. No matter how perfect, you will have fights and arguments where personalities will clash. If there is no physical attraction, lust that holds the relationship together, it will fall apart.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 04:17 PM
2

You should absolutely never show any emotions of weakness in front of women or anyone, in fact. What upside does it have? What are you trying to accomplish by being vulnerable and breaking down? You can show emotions of drive, competitiveness, caring, love (for them), support. But never weakness, vulnerability, indecisiveness, panic, helplessness. It's better to show anger and aggression than weakness. You have to be careful showing emotions of happiness too. The moment you show weakness, you wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 10:03 PM
1

Women are a challenge at any age. I would argue older women are more of a challenge in terms of their demands and expectations, they've done it all, they've tried it all. They want to be "wowed", nothing is "wowing" them and you can feel this attitude.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 12:00 PM
1

I don't know how the myth of older women being easier to deal with came about. For some reason people assume that an older woman is more mature, wiser, smarter. And hence, there’s less nonsense to deal with. I don't agree with that at all. She still has the same mental maturity as when she was 20. Except now an attitude, cause "she knows what she wants". And if she believes she's still 20, it's even worse. A 23 year old woman can be just as mature, emotionally intelligent, and wise as a 50 year …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 01:41 AM
9

Most of the innovations are driven by the desire to acquire more wealth and success. Why? Ultimately it boils down to increasing one's chances of procreation.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 12:36 AM
14

Sex industry would die out in a few years. Magazines, videos, porn, websites, etc. There would be a lot less Internet traffic. Not only sex industry, but think of how many products are sold on sex. Men would become a lot more risk averse, many highly dangerous but important industries would suffer because of that. Men would make a lot less mistakes in dating. And would actually think. It may even reach a point artificial insemination clinics may be required to keep the population going. Innovati…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/24 09:22 PM
2

Not a wrong flag though. Men are not indifferent to women in the workplace. Some men try to bully women, some men try to simp for women. When a women joins a team, the dynamic changes completely. If men start thinking of women as truly the same, women will become either invisible or an enemy. Do like Norah Vincent, and see for yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/24 09:13 PM
7

There would be violence!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/24 09:05 PM
1

If you are unhappy and unsuccessful, marriage will not suddenly change that. I feel it's the opposite, people start being happy, become successful. Marriage is the consequence of all of that. People gravitate towards positive, shiny, happy people. Marriage is a dumb idea for men in this day and age though. And it may have the opposite effect, and make you unhappy. How many reddit posts have there been of being spouses being envious of how happy the other is?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 11:07 AM
1

The truth that is revealed here is that men without dating options are fucking losers. There is no more open way of saying that than a white man dating an Asian woman who he imported. If a man wants to keep a woman, it's more beneficial to him to spend time proving his desirability from other women than it is to prove his love and devotion to her individually. The comparison never stops. Men do the same, but to a lesser degree and because women settle for guys, those guys feel like they got what…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 11:01 AM
-3

What is he losing? His wife. On a serious note, I don't know what your situation is; who is the bread winner? He could potentially lose: Half his wealth His house His car His kids A divorce could reset him back to zero. Whereas it would do no such thing to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 11:41 PM
18

According to the study, they are not.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 04:35 PM
5

Being a single mom may have meant death before. Now it just means getting help from the government, family, and having harder time finding serious commitments (but not dates). However, she is a single mom because she made the decision based on genes. Not financial abilities of the guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 04:26 PM
6

Men are quite simple creatures No, they are not. the average guy can tell whether he would date a woman or not in seconds This applies to women too. I would say women are better at it as they are the choosing sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 12:52 PM
–

Redpill is a business. Courses, consultation calls, and self proclaimed alpha males praying on lonely men. Never give up, never accept reality, just keep trying bro... and keep paying us! And getting frustrated and angrier with failure. I also feel like the redpill subtly teaches hating women and treating them badly. Blackpill, the true blackpill is just the truth with no copes. There is nothing to sell. It is actually liberating, and brings some peace and relief through honest, real answers. Bl…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 02:41 AM
1

I would feel incredibly betrayed if I found out that someone just settled for me. It would instantly tell me that this relationship would not stand any hardship. She would be out of there. I would feel that this person lied to themselves, and lied to me. The scariest part is that you may really love this person, and that can completely cloud your judgement, so you can be like one of OP's groom friends, a happy, clueless oofy-doofy, signing up for years of "is everything ok, honey?". I believe in…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 02:03 AM
1

Dating pools are wider and deeper than who "gossipping women at work" can reach. Can't agree with this. Very easy to reach globally now that everything is connected.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 11:07 AM
2

Thank you, I'll check it out.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 11:11 PM
-1

Very well written post. The bottom line is that it's all about supply and demand. If you have a shop and your local customer starts shopping in another neighbourhood, you are not going to be happy. So you will start talking. The problem for the guy is that women who gossip and talk at work are poisoning the well for him and ruining his reputation. So it's understandable that one would not be happy about that. Ideally they should just be minding their own business. But that's not going to happen.…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 07:03 PM
0

lmao no, me and my man have a purpose in life other than just to pass on genes What is it? if you believe passing on genes is your purpose, then you also believe you are bringing children into the world that have no purpose other than passing on genes My ideas are not original. People far more intelligent than I believe that.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 05:50 PM
-1

If you are starting off a marriage with a prenup, you are starting it off on a distrust. Trust is the whole point of a relationship. I know it's smart to get a prenup. But why not be smarter, and not get married at all then? It may actually work out if both parties are very mature, and the relationship is transactional. But is it going to be romantic? I don't know. In my opinion, romance is overrated and overblown in general in relationships. Ultimately a marriage is a business deal to create an…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 01:31 PM
3

If he has a fantastic sense of humor, he can be less attractive and I’ll still find him appealing. People still believe this? He is funny because he is attractive to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 12:36 AM
15

Very true and deservedly so. A beautiful woman is not a scarce resource. There are a lot of beautiful women out there. But a truly attractive, top man, is very scarse. The scarcest resource there is. So he commands the terms and the power dynamic flips. (It is fascinating to observe a woman who seems strong, confident, and unattainable, just melt, become soft, silly, and submissive with the right guy). In my opinion, the criteria for what can be considered a top value woman is also a lot lower t…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 12:27 AM
1

In general, women want the guy to lead and have more... everything. More relationship experience, more sexual experience, more money, more height, better career, better status. And they want him to lead and for them to follow. Do not believe that women want things on equal terms and equality. They don't want equality from their romantic partner, they want superiority, so they can submit. They only want equality and even privilege with men they are not romantically interested in.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 08:27 PM
3

They want equality with men they are not romantically interested in. But when it comes to choosing a mate, they seek someone superior to submit to. Superior in status, height, finances, looks, everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 12:22 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter