TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ThumpingBump Archive

View 4 posts and 488 comments by ThumpingBump on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

As a man with "no shame", you're so damn wrong 🤣
/r/AntiFeminists24/12/22 12:52 PM
2

Dm Also RIP to your inbox
/r/AntiFeminists23/12/22 05:43 AM
5

Wishing harm on those who deserve it... nice
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/22 12:10 PM
11

Nah bro, not it.
/r/AntiFeminists18/12/22 12:06 PM
2

Eh, you're not wrong. Just as any other job, SAHM is meant to possess financial stability. Personally I agree with mandatory alimony... with situations that can void its mandate.
/r/AntiFeminists18/12/22 09:25 AM
1

Self aware atleast
/r/AntiFeminists14/12/22 08:52 AM
2

Trouble is that "real" feminists are so focused on their work that they don't spare time to deal with the loud extremists.
/r/AntiFeminists12/12/22 10:27 AM
4

Have you seen the results of feminism from the last 30 years?
/r/AntiFeminists11/12/22 04:09 PM
-1

We don't have enough information to say that with complete accuracy
/r/AntiFeminists10/12/22 09:54 PM
-2

There's alot missing from this story... "Kinda eyed me" - could be anything from a glance to visual perversion. "I knew she was scared" - could be anything from emotional projection to the fact the other woman had been through something and has reason for fear in such a situation. Not really easy to get a clear story with vague wording and only the one perspective.
/r/AntiFeminists10/12/22 07:20 PM
3

This "literally" the truth
/r/AntiFeminists09/12/22 12:13 PM
3

Yeah
/r/AntiFeminists08/12/22 12:08 PM
-2

The phrase "cheating is always wrong" is both extremely overcasting in it's moral stance subjective in its definition.
/r/AntiFeminists06/12/22 12:46 PM
11

That's the thing, take it seriously but don't blindly believe it
/r/AntiFeminists05/12/22 07:29 PM
1

As I said before, before the time when middle eastern and south asian religions controlled cultures. The roman REPUBLIC had equal treatment, as too the Spartans or Iberians, early Goths, Norse, Celts etc. The only 2 notable exceptions to this rule were the pre-Ptolemeic Egyptians and Athenians who didn't treat men and women equal.
/r/AntiFeminists05/12/22 06:30 AM
1

I never claimed the roman empire was 🤣 Learn to read, it's a joke at this point
/r/AntiFeminists05/12/22 06:22 AM
1

At what point did I say Christianity was good for women? Because I said the opposite.
/r/AntiFeminists05/12/22 06:17 AM
1

No, the Roman Republic was primarily polytheistic The Roman Empire for most of it's existence had been Christian
/r/AntiFeminists05/12/22 06:15 AM
1

I never claimed the roman empire. The roman empire was predominantly Christian through most of its reign. Meaning it fails the original standard I set. Not to be influenced by middle eastern or south asian religion.
/r/AntiFeminists05/12/22 06:12 AM
1

Yeah, it's from before it's existence.
/r/AntiFeminists05/12/22 06:08 AM
1

The roman empire which fell under which religion again?
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/22 07:30 PM
1

Read the group of religions I am specifically stating.
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/22 07:20 PM
0

First: The dark ages were in the middle ages The middle ages is after the collapse of the roman empire, after 5th century AD, so - no. Second: The ages I'm referring to are Copper, Bronze and early Iron (technological) or Pre-acient, acient and classical (cultural). Essentially anytime period when Christianity, Islam, Sikhism or any other middle eastern/south asian religion didn't have an influence on cultures.
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/22 06:20 PM
0

"Most of history" ≠ The last 1.5 millennia "Most of histroy" = Classical and earlier. The 5th century onwards isn't even 10% of civilizations' history let alone human history itself.
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/22 06:10 PM
0

Most of history funny enough. The exception to it was with aristocracy and middle-eastern/south asian religions.
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/22 05:58 PM
1

Prefer cock mate 😉
/r/MensRights18/11/22 05:31 AM
1

No such thing as a right to cheat, nor should there be.
/r/MensRights18/11/22 12:32 AM
3

If that's the case then you are a despicable waste of oxygen
/r/MensRights17/11/22 11:27 PM
1

Because then it'd be sarcasm
/r/MensRights17/11/22 11:09 PM
4

Or loki
/r/MensRights17/11/22 03:57 PM
1

That's the only reason they care... so they can take money from the largest earning demographic
/r/MensRights16/11/22 07:28 PM
4

I'd recommend adding "/s"
/r/MensRights16/11/22 07:17 PM
1

The incel community started of as a support group but took a nasty turn when misogyny grew from the resentment and self pity found in it's isolation.
/r/MensRights13/11/22 12:47 PM
2

Beat it once, I can beat it again
/r/MensRights02/11/22 05:47 PM
2

Two completely different situations, better of comparing gang/mafia life to war than comparing rape and war. The two are that stark in difference they can't be compared, it's a disrespect to both sides.
/r/MensRights01/11/22 07:00 PM
3

It'll either destroy you or build character, there's no in-between.
/r/MensRights01/11/22 06:55 PM
0

I love how that asian proverb has crossed to all cultures
/r/MensRights30/10/22 03:00 PM
2

Teach them to be respectful and understand that they'll have an instinctive reaction to look but that there's also boundaries we'll should adhere to
/r/MensRights28/10/22 04:44 PM
2

Let’s hope this is a case of ignorant people shouting the loudest. If that isn't the truth of the Internet
/r/MensRights26/10/22 03:16 PM
2

You just proved their point, cheating at it's core has a very simple definition where its nuances change from person to person.
/r/MensRights25/10/22 07:47 PM
2

I've learnt to ingore the politics written into media, only way you can enjoy anything nowadays
/r/MensRights25/10/22 03:04 PM
1

Don't have any children myself but I spend alot of time being a parent to my niece and nephews, dads walking out is way too common in my family. Question then is how many will pick up on that positive?
/r/MensRights20/10/22 07:38 PM
1

I do agree with you there, and I've seen this situation play out enough times to know exactly how it happens. The real problem is that no-ones taught how to be a parent and how to deal with life without it affecting your children - that goes for both genders but in opposite ways.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 06:51 PM
1

The worst of it is the first half of the title, those first 12 words you read could easily be weaponised.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 06:45 PM
1

You're speaking reason on the internet... that's not wise
/r/MensRights20/10/22 05:36 PM
7

No-one here is going to take this comment in good faith
/r/MensRights10/10/22 07:22 PM
10

At it's core, it's the same logic as what is behind "it's all men until it's no men"
/r/MensRights07/10/22 10:43 AM
11

Austism is no excuse, recognise your wrong and be muture about it - Source: Autistic myself
/r/MensRights29/09/22 01:43 PM
2

Toxic masculinity as a problem exists, same with toxic femininity. The real disagreement is the cause of it's existence. I say that it's basic masculine/feminine traits used in negative ways and inturn is a with the individual utilising said traits.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 04:42 PM
2

You don't understand war, do you?
/r/MensRights22/09/22 04:08 PM
3

Was in a similar situation, his parents have alot to say and non of it positive.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 04:12 PM
1

I'd say it's more just the fact there's been some many more male rulers than female so that we've had our chance too build our track record. For every Hitler there is a Trajan or for every Edgar, an Alexander.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 09:11 PM
1

I feel like a proud dad reading this
/r/AntiFeminists15/09/22 10:24 PM
-2

I will admit I am speaking from personal experience and don't take me wrong there's definitely the whole "men/boys don't wear ..." but it seems there's more pressure on women to stay stylish. Personally it's grass is greener - men don't have to have top of fashion style while women can were article of fabric; men can't were so and so while women have to maintain a high level of style. Although I'll stand by and say that I find the luxury for women doesn't outway the negative like it does for men…
/r/MensRights11/09/22 05:57 PM
3

Yeah, I also think physical presentation is more of a womens issue anyway. As long as you have good hygiene and basic care, no-one is too bothered about how men dress.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 03:39 PM
11

Me
/r/MensRights08/09/22 10:36 AM
7

Internet says you're wrong but everyone agrees with you.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 05:23 PM
1

That shows the quality of the extremism not its quantity. One side will usually go further than the other but that side is also usually out numbered by the other - to put it another way.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 03:51 AM
1

Quite possibly.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 02:50 AM
4

I'm not saying everyone who voted for him did so because he was black (his policies did have good ideas afterall) but there were definitely some that made it a strong reason as to why they did or didn't vote for him.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 01:35 AM
3

There were people of bothsides using his skin colour as a reason to vote for him or against him. Same as with Hillary Clinton's gender when she ran for president. People make to big a deal out of identity politics.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 01:13 AM
5

Alot of people made the argument of we should vote for him because of his skin colour, some people out here do care too much about race, gender, sexuality etc.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 01:06 AM
13

It just further proves that basing you're presidential chooce on anything other than qualification is not a wise idea.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 12:55 AM
26

Even after Obama people still claim america is racist.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 12:13 AM
2

All I was saying was "not all women", that's a blantent fact. Even the study you provided proves so.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 01:31 PM
1

Issue is, I'd argue most women do care; especially when it's brothers, sons etc. Men and women are dying left, right and centre but I like to trouble myself with all issues even those that don't effect me because it could still effect someone close to me.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 01:30 PM
2

You do realise this is a study of people in real life and not those that spend every waking second on the internet? To the majority of people taking part in this study, feminism quite literally just means equality of the sexes.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 01:24 PM
2

Some women don't help, others do. That's kinda the premise behind "Not all ___". Spreading awareness and information is always the first step, especially when executed in a non-combative form of discussion. Just that it's blantent you're trying to find traits to try and diminish my arguments through character assassination. Not really hilarious when you see it's negative effects on many of those involved.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 01:22 PM
2

"Notably, many of those who identify as feminist are critical of the feminist movement." From the same source, it seems that these women are able to discern the difference from the words of the movement and its actions.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 01:18 PM
1

Women have taken part in mens marches, women have taken part in helping men with accessing abuse shelters; there are good women out there and good women that do what they can to help. Some of those creators have pushed through things like getting doxxed to carry on their work. Love how you pick up on the anti-porn but not the anti-feminism.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 01:15 PM
1

Statistic on the majority? Many women do speak out against it and have fast growing platforms on the internet to help out. No, I'm just sticking to what's logical, you can't defend one half of the population from a demonising tactic while trying to attack the other half with the same tactic.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 01:08 PM
1

As a whole? No, if it's not all men - it's not all women
/r/MensRights31/08/22 01:03 PM
0

Isn't the Alf Layla wa-Layla just a #KAM story but gendered reversed?
/r/AntiFeminists22/08/22 04:28 PM
1

If you voted latter, please expand.
/r/AntiFeminists19/08/22 03:44 PM
2

See, that studies on physical strenuous... which is on par off average strength with heightened endurance. I dropped my studies of science to work physical labour jobs but I've got to pick and choose them, my fiance doesn't want me working too dangerous jobs.
/r/AntiFeminists19/08/22 03:38 PM
2

I said if we're adding endurance, so strength and endurance... traits needed for the jobs that build infrastructure, crop farms, commercialise fish, produce physical luxuries; the jobs that are the backbone to a nations success and jobs that many women choose to shy away from due to the combination of strength and endurance required.
/r/AntiFeminists19/08/22 03:20 PM
1

It's vague in how you measure strength. Because if we're just talking how much you can lift/pull/push then not many jobs, but if we're adding endurance to it then it very nears majority of jobs.
/r/AntiFeminists19/08/22 03:06 PM
1

"Do you do physical labour? What percentage of the workforce requires superior physical strength do you reckon?" — "Superior physical strength" You kinda did...
/r/AntiFeminists19/08/22 03:00 PM
1

Because it's vague, you need specify what you mean by "physical superiority".
/r/AntiFeminists19/08/22 02:32 PM
2

In short, alot of feminists, aren't even feminists... only in the spaces out of misandry. Edit: Internet Feminists.
/r/AntiFeminists19/08/22 01:57 PM
1

Because abusers hijacked every DV, DA, SV, SA movement feminism put out in hopes to secure their "innocence" or give them one last fuck 'em over before losing the victim.
/r/AntiFeminists19/08/22 01:57 PM
2

That's the closest to an answer you'll get with a phrase as vague as "physical superior advantage". Men build muscle quicker and naturally hold more as a base level then women - meaning they're automatically more suited for physical jobs, and can adapt to the ones they aren't suited for quicker. Percentage of jobs that require this trait, any of heavy lifting.
/r/AntiFeminists19/08/22 01:54 PM
1

Fuck me, you can't say that... you can't say that!
/r/AntiFeminists19/08/22 01:49 PM
1

Depends on what you mean, women could strengthen up to any job but there's more jobs men have naturally strengthened to and it'd be quicker for to strengthen up to a job.
/r/AntiFeminists19/08/22 01:45 PM
1

Majority of other commenters suggest that tate ideology isn't all too welcome here.
/r/AntiFeminists18/08/22 01:07 PM
2

You read the other comments?
/r/AntiFeminists18/08/22 12:56 PM
13

Statistics, western world nations are predominantly white so most jobs are filled predominantly white.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 10:28 PM
1

Just imagine if we started holding these "healthy relationship standards"
/r/MensRights13/08/22 12:24 PM
2

I mean, this was a commen logic based argument used as to why it didn't exist so... guess that argument is now out the window.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 09:32 PM
8

Bisexual, Autistic/Aspergers, Ethnic minority... but I'm male, still hard for me even with 3 seperate perks to being hired.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 09:30 PM
1

Because there's a group of people in this sub thay believe this is a space for misogyny and woman hating.
/r/AntiFeminists04/08/22 08:08 PM
1

It's not
/r/AntiFeminists04/08/22 12:10 PM
1

Yeah, this sub has a real mixed bag in terms of type of anti-feminists here.
/r/AntiFeminists04/08/22 12:09 PM
14

Or because so many of us ourselves go through this kind of shit and if we had more context we could help comfort or process
/r/MensRights03/08/22 06:59 PM
1

Yeah
/r/AntiFeminists03/08/22 08:55 AM
1

"the deliberate termination of a human pregnancy" Ectopic pregnancies require this, yes?
/r/AntiFeminists01/08/22 11:01 PM
1

Can the mods pin this?
/r/AntiFeminists31/07/22 01:47 PM
0

Nope, their reason is blatant sexual discrimination
/r/AntiFeminists31/07/22 09:13 AM
3

In cards the king has more power, in chess it's the queen. One better at one while the other is better at another just as irl.
/r/AntiFeminists30/07/22 04:56 PM
11

Is that your white piece or mine? And why is there only black and white when there are so many more poc's?
/r/AntiFeminists30/07/22 04:54 PM
1

An abortion is the deliberate termination of the pregnancy, currently the treatment is still an abortion because it's the deliberate termination.
/r/AntiFeminists28/07/22 04:23 PM
1

So currently it's an abortion
/r/AntiFeminists28/07/22 02:39 PM
2

Pro-life/Anti-Choice ≠ Anti-abortion. Anti-abortion would be banning ALL abortions which any sane person is against.
/r/AntiFeminists28/07/22 08:09 AM
2

Keyword similar, there's differences but all are still drastically under-reporting
/r/AntiFeminists22/07/22 09:23 PM
1

It similar under all 3 conditions
/r/AntiFeminists22/07/22 10:42 AM
1

When did I say it should be banned?
/r/AntiFeminists22/07/22 08:52 AM
0

My family didn't adopt so many by all of us adopting, donating and preaching each. We split the work load: Those who adopt. Those who donate. Those who carry the bloodline and preach. My responsibility lays in making sure the family's values and practices are passed on with it's bloodline continuing. Others are to adopt and pass the values through those and ensure that they carry on the pattern. Then there's those whose role lays in making as much money as possible to donate and support the rest…
/r/AntiFeminists22/07/22 08:46 AM
0

Afraid that's not my job, this is a family effort split into 3 main jobs.
/r/AntiFeminists22/07/22 08:33 AM
1

3/100 women x 2/week in a year = 3/100x2x52 = 3/10400 = 1/3466
/r/AntiFeminists21/07/22 09:11 PM
0

My extended family make up 45% of my towns population, only 2% of my family (0.9% of the towns population) are blood/marriage relatives - the rest are adopted. Closest clinic is 65 miles away.
/r/AntiFeminists21/07/22 08:03 PM
1

Or fix that suffering without killing
/r/AntiFeminists21/07/22 07:53 PM
2

As long as it doesn't kill or punish an innocent life, no problem with other options.
/r/AntiFeminists21/07/22 07:49 PM
1

So assuming sex is averaging 2/week - every week for a 3/10'400 or 1/3'466 or 0.029%
/r/AntiFeminists21/07/22 07:21 PM
0

Accountability isn't a lifestyle my friend
/r/AntiFeminists21/07/22 06:57 PM
5

Well you choose to have sex, you choose to take that 3% risk.
/r/AntiFeminists21/07/22 06:44 PM
7

Consequences of my actions and choices
/r/AntiFeminists21/07/22 05:28 PM
2

OK, I can agree to that one.
/r/AntiFeminists19/07/22 10:19 PM
2

Insignificant by what context of the word?
/r/AntiFeminists19/07/22 09:53 PM
2

70% of non-reciprocal abuse victims are men <50% of reciprocal abuse victims are men due lesbian relationships having a noticeably higher rate of reciprocated abuse than any-other relationship. The point of my first comment is to ensure everyone understands the keyword for the accuracy of the first statement is the word 'non-reciprocal'
/r/AntiFeminists19/07/22 09:48 PM
1

Go back on the conversation, you'll find the topic changed from non-reciprocal to reciprocal when you asked me to expand on my first reply and then replied to my second.
/r/AntiFeminists19/07/22 09:40 PM
1

We're talking about the percentage men who have been in reciprocally abusive relationships, that doesn't have to be 50% of men also nearer 50% does include 50%, I said nearer because I didn't remember the exact number.
/r/AntiFeminists19/07/22 09:34 PM
3

Reciprocal is nearer 50%
/r/AntiFeminists19/07/22 09:17 PM
3

Operative word 'non-recipocal'.
/r/AntiFeminists19/07/22 04:21 PM
1

There's certain sects of feminism that believe women should not be held accountable for their actions, it's part of what's pushed us to a culture where women are able to behave like this without anyone intervening - That and the bystander effect.
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/22 10:11 AM
2

Because a life is currently under threat, big reason to care
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 09:28 PM
3

I think therefore I am, everyone else fuck off.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 09:39 AM
21

You really think this isn't reality?
/r/AntiFeminists07/07/22 12:57 PM
1

6, 7, 9 and 10 are the most common signs... because... they're normal traits
/r/AntiFeminists07/07/22 09:09 AM
3

That's the thing, it doesn't have to... I don't mind women being propped up and having special unique privileges as long as it doesn't harm men. It's the fact that they choose to make it harm men.
/r/AntiFeminists04/07/22 11:51 AM
3

You need to fix your priorities my friend.
/r/AntiFeminists02/07/22 04:58 PM
3

21 year old man here... never heard it. Nosebleeds from crying are possible. Cringe or not, it's a common reality. It's an amateur video, not gonna expect a marvel film are we?
/r/AntiFeminists02/07/22 04:16 PM
3

20 seconds of pleasure over a lifetime of enjoyment - really?
/r/AntiFeminists02/07/22 04:14 PM
1

I'm arguing that, it seemed you were arguing child support full stop.
/r/AntiFeminists02/07/22 02:05 PM
2

Well, children are entitled to their parents resources. Ex-wives... less so.
/r/AntiFeminists02/07/22 09:47 AM
8

They're mono-party democrats.
/r/AntiFeminists01/07/22 04:01 PM
2

As much as I love the woman, she does still fall for TERF logic... so that'll explain it.
/r/AntiFeminists30/06/22 01:22 PM
4

Pretty much what my fiancé would say but followed with "feminism is about femininity and therefore females not women."
/r/AntiFeminists30/06/22 12:43 PM
2

I would say that for my fiancé but she definitely fits TERF minus the 'R'
/r/AntiFeminists30/06/22 11:43 AM
1

Doesn't everyone die eventually? Think they need to be more clear.
/r/AntiFeminists30/06/22 11:42 AM
2

There's not even an argument going on here that's the joke, we'll see when (if) this bill passes how common this opinion is amoung feminists... until then, there's no debate in this thread - just mindless squabbling.
/r/AntiFeminists30/06/22 10:01 AM
1

Then why do so many feminists shame traditionally valued women?
/r/AntiFeminists29/06/22 02:08 PM
7

No, no, no my friend. You can't do that, they don't like facts
/r/AntiFeminists28/06/22 10:04 PM
5

They complained about being dehumanised when this genocide is justified via dehumanisation.
/r/AntiFeminists28/06/22 10:02 PM
1

Yeah that's the plan, already looking at mortgages.
/r/AntiFeminists28/06/22 05:06 PM
1

No, it's just things like money and improving life.
/r/AntiFeminists28/06/22 04:56 PM
1

If anything it's me being impatient it's me, I'm currently on mental health leave with how much I've stressed myself over fixing what I want fixing before a kid comes along.
/r/AntiFeminists28/06/22 01:30 PM
1

When we both didn't want kids, we didn't have sex (it's the only 100% way) now that she ready and I'm willing to take the risk we look at other options while still getting to have fun.
/r/AntiFeminists28/06/22 01:29 PM
1

Second relationship and she fully understands my reasoning as to why I'm not ready.
/r/AntiFeminists28/06/22 01:26 PM
1

We were originally on the same page, why would she be when it's currently just me not wanting a kid?
/r/AntiFeminists28/06/22 01:19 PM
1

We got together at 17/18 - at the time we bith knew we wanted kids in the future, she's ready to have one while I don't feel as though I'm ready yet. We didn't have sex for 2 1/2 years because she realises the best contraception is abstinence, she's now perfectly ready to have kids - while I still want the chances of having them now to still be low/negligible. I imagine I'd want kids in 2-3 years but we have more important things to worry about than having one, especially at 21/22.
/r/AntiFeminists28/06/22 12:38 PM
0

I want kids in the future, I'm 21 (personally too young for kids)... it's my responsibility to take actions and make changes to not risk having them and because I want kids at some point in life vasectomies are of the table.
/r/AntiFeminists28/06/22 12:32 PM
1

My fiancé is ready for kids, I'm not. I take castration pills and use condoms, my want - my responsibility - action.
/r/AntiFeminists28/06/22 12:27 PM
2

If you don't want kids, you do something about it - to yourself. I castration pills and use condoms, because while my fiancé is ready for kids - I'm not.
/r/AntiFeminists28/06/22 12:25 PM
3

Taking your responsibility and getting your own tubes tied would be better, only you are responsible for what you want.
/r/AntiFeminists28/06/22 12:15 PM
3

So she's throwing her own responsibility for her fertility onto others
/r/AntiFeminists28/06/22 12:13 PM
3

Then why close your options by selecting only vasectomies when instead you could get your tubes tied and keep your options open.
/r/AntiFeminists28/06/22 12:09 PM
4

Then the person who is saying they don't want kids should have the vasectomy/tubal ligation.
/r/AntiFeminists28/06/22 12:08 PM
2

All are high 90's in terms of success rate... this looks like it could be less than a fail rate of 0.00001%
/r/AntiFeminists28/06/22 12:02 PM
3

Also the operation/procedure have very low chances of retaining fertility after reversal. Best bet has and always will be abstinence if you don't want kids.
/r/AntiFeminists28/06/22 11:57 AM
19

🎶 Jealousy 🎶
/r/AntiFeminists23/06/22 06:24 PM
3

Yeah, MOST people here fit the dictionary definition of feminist... it's just that we look at actions more than words.
/r/AntiFeminists21/06/22 05:08 PM
4

No expert but it appears that this sub also spot lights general idiocy that relates to sexist ideologies
/r/AntiFeminists21/06/22 05:06 PM
1

Homophobic... I'm bisexual, I'm just able to see that the community has normalised some pretty horrible things and whenever anyone tries to call it out you get words like this. You do realise realise LGBT are 32x more likely to be pedophilic than straights
/r/AntiFeminists20/06/22 11:23 AM
4

Believe me, lgbt does not care about age of consent... there's a reason I've disassociated myself with the community.
/r/AntiFeminists20/06/22 03:49 AM
3

Yeah
/r/AntiFeminists19/06/22 04:18 PM
4

That's my thought
/r/AntiFeminists11/06/22 09:05 AM
1

I don't shave but I put a lot of care into keeping my body silky and soft.
/r/AntiFeminists11/06/22 09:03 AM
6

Yep, been waist deep in it for a month, fuck my life, they're ignorant.
/r/AntiFeminists07/06/22 05:30 PM
1

Really this sub should be renamed anti-radical feminists.
/r/AntiFeminists06/06/22 04:54 PM
8

You'd be surprised how real some people treat it.
/r/AntiFeminists06/06/22 01:43 PM
-2

They have their fair share of radicals but india is a nation that needs moderate feminism. The women there are oppressed, that's a fact we can't deny even as antifeminists
/r/AntiFeminists05/06/22 12:26 PM
4

I said radicals do
/r/AntiFeminists05/06/22 11:41 AM
6

Best of luck to you guys over there.
/r/AntiFeminists05/06/22 09:35 AM
18

Remember, if you never fix the problem... you can always complain about it
/r/AntiFeminists05/06/22 09:32 AM
15

Please tell me you're referring to the topside image
/r/AntiFeminists05/06/22 09:31 AM
2

They still supported gender roles back then, fighting was something men were meant to do. By their times it was expected but now with our modern look we can notice how it's not always a good standard.
/r/AntiFeminists05/06/22 09:29 AM
15

We are well aware it's needed in other countries and I'm willing to bet there's a fair number here that are willing to support, this sub is primarily directed to western radical feminists.
/r/AntiFeminists05/06/22 09:27 AM
5

Afraid it is... well, for the case of radicals it is.
/r/AntiFeminists05/06/22 09:17 AM
11

We definitely need metoo movement
/r/MensRights05/06/22 08:38 AM
1

🤣 I'm fucking dead, that's a good one.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 04:56 AM
1

6'5 and muscular, not a millionaires sadly and I won't settle for such a shit attitude, doubt the millionaires would.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 03:53 AM
8

Yeah and the gal I've found is amazing because she does this, what she expects of others, she expects of herself.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/22 12:30 AM
6

Already got someone my friend
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/22 12:19 AM
-2

And that's a generalisation, congratulations, you're on your way to being sexist.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/22 12:03 AM
22

If the hold themselves to those same standards, they can have whatever standards they like.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/22 10:02 PM
3

As a Brit, fuck your xenophobic attitudes.
/r/AntiFeminists03/06/22 05:50 PM
1

I'm up for some good hearted mental sparing
/r/MensRights03/06/22 04:09 PM
2

Feminist: that's because mens issues are only perpetuated by other men and women actually try to kill themselves more often then men but often fail, also women have a higher rate of depression than men. When you survive an attempt it's likely you are going to try again at some point. Feminist: this actually doesn't happen often and infact most rape victims are afraid to come forward because with little to no evidence courts tend to favor men, and even those convinced only tend to go to prison fo…
/r/MensRights03/06/22 10:31 AM
2

Note these are the same people that tear down the whole pedos actions aren't reasoned from their trauma theory. But a serial killer? Definitely reasoned through trauma.
/r/AntiFeminists03/06/22 09:36 AM
3

This exchange gives me happy
/r/AntiFeminists03/06/22 09:33 AM
2

That's child support not alimony
/r/MensRights02/06/22 01:05 PM
1

Thanks for the correction, as I believed I said it was a common stereotype. I'll remember for future.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 11:29 AM
3

Name one right then, one right that men from any english speaking nation have that women don't. Lots of countries to choose from.
/r/AntiFeminists02/06/22 10:39 AM
2

Let's look at this in a collection of situations that cover 99% of all cases; this is how I think it should be. PS = spouse that provides during mariage RS = spouce that recieves the providing during mariage No-fault divorces where there is a PS & RS, the PS pays alimony as a "good faith loan" until RS is able to provide for themselves for as long as RS can prove they are still looking for ways to provide for themselves as well as being indebted to pay back the alimony support. If RS fails to pr…
/r/MensRights02/06/22 05:41 AM
8

Selfishness...
/r/AntiFeminists30/05/22 04:02 PM
0

We don't need to give actual misogynists any value in their arguments though, it might be able to be seen as a win for men but it could easily be twisted.
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/22 11:14 PM
0

Elizabeth I, Cleopatra, Dido, Kathrine the great... and many more all women - all war lords
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/22 02:05 PM
0

No, that's the words the gal put into his mouth, watch again and pay attention to his reaction... his face instinctively disagrees with what she says he says.
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/22 02:01 PM
10

Same reason why school shootings hit american national news but mass shootings only hit local news.
/r/MensRights28/05/22 05:16 PM
34

Note: If it's in the news, it's most likely not as common as it looks.
/r/MensRights28/05/22 12:19 PM
2

It should have been phrased better, you're not wrong there.
/r/AntiFeminists27/05/22 07:16 PM
7

They don't want rights, they want lack or responsibility. Actually, that's any rights movement. Before 1900's, rights weren't realy a thing, you had responsibilities and fulfilling your responsibilities gave you privileges. The rights movements aimed to keep the privileges while removing any responsibilities. It's why calling MLK a black rights activist does him a diservice, he was a black equalist... he essentially just said if whites have this, why can't blacks.
/r/AntiFeminists27/05/22 09:20 AM
71

No, no, no... you forget, that's only if the adult is male.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 07:44 PM
1

Majority of statistics either date after '03 or go far back when you can actually date the time men stopped reporting.
/r/AntiFeminists26/05/22 01:21 AM
3

They removed the men being victims of rape in 2003, before then it included men
/r/AntiFeminists25/05/22 06:38 PM
5

UK high magistrate court.
/r/AntiFeminists25/05/22 12:19 PM
9

Yeah, feminism many times has proved itself capable of terrorism
/r/AntiFeminists22/05/22 05:03 PM
2

Some are not just ok but willing to shoot up all boys schools.
/r/AntiFeminists20/05/22 07:57 PM
1

There's more to fashion than just dressing, if it weren't for my tattoos, make up etc. my scaring would definitely be off putting.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 01:30 PM
1

I have severe scaring from different cuts and burns, definitely not the same but usually with these types if thungs playing physical anomalies into style... my case tattoos... will help drastically with looks, find a friend with a good sense of style and see if they're willing to help or even just a fashion advisor.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 01:23 PM
2

Yeah and because the method itself is barbaric and not surgical it makes it easier to see a difference.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 01:09 PM
1

Accidents that gave left scars, dietary habits that case spots and weight... anything that isn’t genetic essentially.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 01:08 PM
2

The 2 have a common connotation due to the stereotype of it's use in the middle east. That's why people see a difference and are able to explain the double standard, "not because of men or women but because of method".
/r/MensRights17/05/22 12:56 PM
1

Height can't change, but it can be nuetralised by your looks. Question is then are you're looks diminished by outside factors or genetic?
/r/MensRights17/05/22 12:54 PM
7

There isn't because there's a natural serenity in having an intact body.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 12:50 PM
7

Only reason we see FGM as worse is because of the acid idea from the middle east, the ideology of both are just as barbaric but the involvement of acid just adds to it.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 12:49 PM
5

Fuck that, according to some laws.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 12:45 PM
2

77% of attackers are male and 4/5 of victims are male, how are they not majority statistics?
/r/AntiFeminists13/05/22 04:44 PM
0

Largely male on male crime.
/r/AntiFeminists13/05/22 04:33 PM
2

Like, im at the sperm/dance off and im dead
/r/MensRights13/05/22 09:52 AM
6

How the fuck did you make it through so many episodes?
/r/MensRights13/05/22 09:50 AM
6

Where can i find this?
/r/MensRights13/05/22 09:45 AM
2

Even when one sex dominates one crime, the other sex will have it's own counterpart. Similar to companies, think about how Microsoft, Sony and Nintendo operate in the game industry... all game companies, but concentrate on their own secter, same with gender and crime.
/r/AntiFeminists10/05/22 05:43 PM
5

That's the thing, feminism has a nasty habit of gendering problems that shouldn't be. Most of their issues are because of bad people, just so happens that because they're women - they notice it more from men. It's goes both ways; there's no bad gender, just bad people.
/r/AntiFeminists10/05/22 04:43 PM
1

Really... fucking really, there's so many things wrong with this...
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 04:02 PM
3

Alot of workd leaders come to mind
/r/MensRights09/05/22 12:45 PM
-2

I definitely agree not all were but as you said it did stray heavily.
/r/MensRights09/05/22 12:20 PM
-7

Not true for everyone on there, but the was definitely a sizable quantity
/r/MensRights09/05/22 12:13 PM
-22

Amazing how you're downvoted for expressing the truth.
/r/MensRights09/05/22 03:34 AM
1

You literally said "You can't have it both ways" when both can coexist
/r/AntiFeminists07/05/22 11:54 PM
1

The 2 can coexist, one being the ability to ve sexually attracted to both genders and the other being a requirement to actually form a sexual attraction to either. Similar to how I'm bisexual but heteromantic.
/r/AntiFeminists07/05/22 11:49 PM
2

Same when i broke 3 limbs, just didn't do PE
/r/AntiFeminists07/05/22 04:38 PM
1

Also heat retention doesn't do sperms production any good
/r/AntiFeminists07/05/22 08:49 AM
4

Personally no, I'm against abortion but that doesn't matter right now... if you're not mature enough to deal with people of opposing values then you shouldn't be in political climates.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 06:51 PM
1

Don't need people like you here
/r/MensRights06/05/22 06:48 PM
2

I've met a few feminists that only concentrate on actual problems women face and tries to find solutions that don't effect men, we need more women like her.
/r/AntiFeminists06/05/22 09:16 AM
1

Yes bur that's just what's said, when you look at actions you start to notice a trend that doesn't fit the definition.
/r/AntiFeminists06/05/22 09:12 AM
7

Let's just ignore 90% of these procedures go against the hipocratic oath
/r/AntiFeminists05/05/22 11:28 AM
1

Unless you're good looking and take advantage of online dating. Have that option but I refuse to use dating apps.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 06:01 AM
1

I can list 11 men I personally know that this perfectly describes
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 04:13 AM
1

As I said, I'm not gonna comment... haven't had such experience in those areas.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 10:30 PM
0

I'm not going to comment on city or uni culture I've had no experience in either.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 10:25 PM
1

I'm my experience the "better" people have more red flags
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 09:47 PM
2

City folk or rural?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 09:45 PM
0

My friend group is near 50/50 with more female friends than male being held closer.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 09:36 PM
1

There's a difference between doing your best and over-exhausting yourself (which a lot of guys have had to do) I don't expect anyone to get away with putting as little effort as I have because as I've said before, I got lucky. And I've never seen a guy actually unironically have a list like that, maybe they'd include the last if they're into anal but then most guys I've known aren't into it. Typically when it comes to being bothered by how a woman looks the majority of the standard comes from ot…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 09:09 PM
7

Because it happens, and quite often men are scared to report because of how often we're shamed for being weak in that situation.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 09:00 PM
2

Sorry I meant your maximum amount of "natural" effort, because your natural amount of effort shouldn't really feel like effort, that's why it's your natural.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 08:59 PM
4

I don't expect to be easy but I also refuse to put in more than my maximum "natural" effort, which I've noticed a lot guys have to do and that's the problem because alot of women don't exhaust that effort threshold and still have an easier time then alot of men... personally I blame the double standard around having standards and really that's it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 08:57 PM
7

Doesn't mean it's easy, the effort I've seen the average woman put into getting dates/laid etc. is a lot less than what I've seen the average man put in.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 08:41 PM
3

Just going by what I've seen, the average guy struggles and I'm just lucky as in I'm 6"5 with stable money and the "perfect 10" face, so I can reasonably just work with what I've got.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 08:35 PM
6

Personally never had a problem getting dates but I know most guys in my life had.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 08:28 PM
11

My point is they give up using a natural amount of effort, because we've always had to push ourselves beyond anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 08:27 PM
2

Exactly, personally I'd rather raise them myself because just the fact of were you come from could twist your view of a group of people... and I don't trust others to do a good job raising people to meet others with a clean slate.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 08:26 PM
38

Most just give up or rely on luck after they turn 25, alot of them just don't feel the efforts worth anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 07:08 PM
7

Personally I'd take the child's custody to court and fight for full custody, wouldn't want my flesh and blood around a rapist.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 07:06 PM
1

True, but it's not invasive surgery. Getting your tubes tied involves cutting through the abdomen and shuffling around organs, there's a massively higher chance of complications.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 06:47 PM
1

Both sites agree that it's stupid to do if you're planning on future kids.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 06:44 PM
29

"Vasectomy reversal is a complicated procedure that's not always guaranteed to work." The first sentence you see on the NHS website...
/r/MensRights04/05/22 04:08 AM
2

UK brother, that's where I'm lucky
/r/MensRights04/05/22 12:49 AM
4

Yeah, that's why I made the comparison to the jackpots, I see about 3 a week tops The jackpots average 1 in every 47040 spins and they'd need to be 120x more frequent to hit 50 in a day.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 10:36 PM
4

Rare cases it is and could even self reverse however, I work in a bookies and there's a better chance of me seeing 50 jackpots in a day.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 10:30 PM
8

I personally recommend vasectomies over tubal ligation just because of how convenient and far out the body the mens procedure is. Still irreversible, etc and should never be consider by any young persons though.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 05:56 PM
25

It's why I plan to only after kids, once I feel I've had enough.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 05:51 PM
25

You've said it yourself, you want kids in the future.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 05:50 PM
12

Abd this is why we need bullying
/r/AntiFeminists03/05/22 04:29 PM
8

Ever realised there aren't any gay men that say men aren't shit?
/r/AntiFeminists03/05/22 04:01 PM
2

Dude... HIGHER standard... nudge, nudge, wink, wink... higher... hight...
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 03:12 AM
1

"Higher standard"... pun intended?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 01:36 AM
1

You don't say
/r/AntiFeminists02/05/22 08:15 PM
1

There's a difference in average earnings, yes? Then there's a gap. Is it discrimination, sexism etc.? Depends on what causes the gap. What causes the gap? Lifestyle choices, is this any items on the fore mentioned list? No, So nothing needs to change.
/r/AntiFeminists02/05/22 06:32 PM
1

Say a man and a woman work the same job at the end of the year the man earns 22,000 and the woman earns 20,000. It's a wage gap: If the man does 10h/d × 220d/y = 22,000 If the woman does 10h/d × 200d/y = 20,000 It's a pay gap: If the man does 10h/d × 220d/y = 22,000 If the woman does 10h/d × 220d/y = 20,000 The difference is in hourly rate, something that is now protected by law and can no longer be systemic.
/r/AntiFeminists02/05/22 03:01 PM
1

When you account for them, you are talking about a pay gap. The average earnings in a year is the wage gap.
/r/AntiFeminists02/05/22 02:54 PM
0

No, over a year the average woman does earn less than the average man, it's why it's the wage gap. What you're thinking of (hopefully) is the pay gap which is based in hourly rate and dies not exist.
/r/AntiFeminists02/05/22 09:52 AM
1

Reasonable and justifiable force, no reason to take maltreatment just because of gender. Something we all need to learn.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 03:24 AM
1

Well... look at single people. Some hiw they manage to do everything.
/r/MensRights01/05/22 06:55 PM
5

I felt this
/r/MensRights01/05/22 02:25 PM
24

Banter, good sir, banter
/r/MensRights01/05/22 02:25 PM
3

Hey, sorry to burst your bubble
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/22 02:12 PM
2

If that's all you've got left to say, I'd suggest you go back to digging through the history books...
/r/MensRights01/05/22 06:22 AM
2

No, women could work to purchase, inherit or just marry into land ownership.
/r/MensRights01/05/22 06:21 AM
2

Also noticed your ignoring the other reply, struggling to read?
/r/MensRights01/05/22 06:18 AM
2

I never said that, I said how the graph misses information on how men were disenfranchised.
/r/MensRights01/05/22 06:15 AM
2

They could and did, it's well known in England that we had many Landlady's throughout history.
/r/MensRights01/05/22 06:14 AM
1

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conscription_in_the_United_Kingdom#:~:text=In%20the%20United%20Kingdom%2C%20conscription,Service%22%20from%201939%20to%201960. https://www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/transformingsociety/private-lives/yourcountry/overview/nationalservice/ Punishment for evading such a draft was prison time which would revoke your right to vote. Also at the time the voting age was 21 and the draft age started as early as 17. If you did not fight, you couldn't vote while wom…
/r/MensRights01/05/22 06:11 AM
3

You said how the graph destroys most mens rights and I said how the graph misses key information, don't be disingenuous and keep track of where the conversation started with your own statement.
/r/MensRights01/05/22 05:56 AM
2

Umm... we're talking about the UK, notice how the graph says "parliamentary"
/r/MensRights01/05/22 05:08 AM
2

Basic Google search or gov.co.uk or a legislation history website... am really going to need proof for your claim though
/r/MensRights01/05/22 04:15 AM
2

Like how I'm getting downvoted on what I personally do.
/r/MensRights01/05/22 01:51 AM
2

Different times, different values... the right to vote before feminism was never considered a right but a privilege awarded for massively contributing to your nation... typically large amounts of land tax.
/r/MensRights01/05/22 01:13 AM
2

The right to vote, up until the 1960's men could only vote if they were in the military for so long while women just had to apply for the vote.
/r/MensRights01/05/22 01:11 AM
1

I hold the same advantage, I make over double what she does... she'll struggle without me just as much as I would her, those savings would only last so long covering her expenses for life.
/r/MensRights01/05/22 12:59 AM
2

If we were married, yes but right now I am taking a risk.
/r/MensRights01/05/22 12:07 AM
6

Hahaha
/r/MensRights30/04/22 06:06 PM
1

I'm to drunk for this, I'll be back later
/r/AntiFeminists30/04/22 04:46 PM
1

True
/r/AntiFeminists30/04/22 04:46 PM
5

It completely misses the fact that women didn't need to do anything but apply, while men needed to do mandatory military service.
/r/MensRights30/04/22 04:43 PM
1

We will be next year, but it's just playing ti each others strengths.
/r/MensRights30/04/22 04:36 PM
-1

No, it's I can't save... I have money I spend it so it's better for me to spend more and her save because then we'll be saving the most we can.
/r/MensRights30/04/22 02:56 PM
-16

It's not how you much you pay, it's hiw much you make. I make 70% but pay closer to 90% because my SO is better at saving than me.
/r/MensRights30/04/22 12:55 PM
46

Go by percentage, I earn 70% of the monthly income and my fiance dies 70% of the house work.
/r/MensRights30/04/22 11:11 AM
0

In America, out of all rape cases that make it to court. 2% are false 8% are true 90% are dismissed due to lack of evidence
/r/AntiFeminists30/04/22 10:30 AM
1

Hahaha, we fucking won
/r/AntiFeminists28/04/22 07:55 PM
-4

How so?
/r/MensRights28/04/22 06:52 PM
2

Think people are misunderstanding you here mate.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 12:19 PM
25

UK feminists in 1900s publicly shamed men into go to war and die in war The amount if reports where men were given a wight feather even though they were on leave from the front lines (sometimes the very day they came back) is astounding.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 12:14 PM
3

Two relationships: First one (doesn't really count) was also a sparing partner for fighting. Second one, didn't like me going to pubs
/r/MensRights27/04/22 09:37 AM
2

Ah, the shit that makes you hate your parents?
/r/MensRights27/04/22 02:44 AM
-2

Should have said this references people's teens not birth. Does skew with Millenials and Techs though
/r/MensRights27/04/22 12:22 AM
1

My step-dad's dad was as were my great-grandparents... had the honour of meeting them all.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 12:00 AM
-10

The Lost Generation - 1900/10 The Greatest Generation - 1920/30 The Silent Generation - 1940/1950 Boomers - 1960/1970 Millenials - 1980/1990 The Tech Generation - 2000/10 Gen Aplha - 2020 roughly Thing is generations aren't so black an white an "old " Millenial has more in common with a "young" boomer than he does a "young" Millenial just because him and the boomer were born 2 or 3 years apart.
/r/MensRights26/04/22 11:45 PM
7

That's my point
/r/MensRights26/04/22 09:32 PM
9

That's the thing every generation has it shit, it just seems boomers forgot to teach gen x some form of stoicism.
/r/MensRights26/04/22 09:03 PM
29

Yep, fits status quo. If man does bad, mens fault — If woman does bad, mens fault
/r/MensRights26/04/22 07:37 AM
6

See a man in a kids park, what's your first thought.
/r/MensRights25/04/22 08:55 PM
3

Up to you, bust personally I don't have the patience. Happy cake day
/r/AntiFeminists25/04/22 06:24 PM
3

Plus kurwa
/r/MensRights25/04/22 04:40 PM
7

That's when you force them into consistency.
/r/AntiFeminists25/04/22 02:41 PM
8

I've learnt to just play by their rules... "Oxford says feminism is —" so "Oxford says the patriarchy is —"
/r/AntiFeminists25/04/22 02:22 PM
0

A patriarchy by it's dictionary definition has definitely existed in the past, however since democracy and laws protecting voter suppression a patriarchy is impossible.
/r/AntiFeminists25/04/22 02:02 PM
3

That's when it becomes a case of if it's a way of dealing with trauma or something they'd be into regardless.
/r/AntiFeminists24/04/22 05:29 PM
1

Only know 1 personally
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 09:30 AM
1

Why because I don't refer to women as gestational units?
/r/AntiFeminists22/04/22 09:10 PM
0

I think pump and dump bit I don't know
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 03:03 PM
1

I never said that they were wrongs done to women specifically, just the wrongs done to women.
/r/AntiFeminists22/04/22 09:21 AM
1

So... not a single man out there is capable of leadership? Imma call bs on that one.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 10:22 PM
2

Yeah, never said otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 02:52 PM
2

Already been over this, nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 02:13 PM
1

modern marriages they dont offer much. That's what I'm getting at.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 02:09 PM
1

I'll admit commodity threw me off a fair bit as well. And what do men have to offer that's unique besides their penis? Same amount as women... I'm not denying that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 02:08 PM
-5

In fairness, that's really all women have to offer that is unique to only women... everything else can be done by either yourself, mates, pets etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 02:04 PM
1

I never claimed their lives were easy, most died of horrific diseases ffs. The issue is that as long as they satisfied the people to the point where they didn't stress of rebellion, everything else they did was pure self interest. It's why the good rulers of the past are held in such high esteem... they were rare. As I said civilization is a male invention designed for women to benefit, I fully believe the cultures that birthed these societies had no idea what they would turn into and we need wo…
/r/AntiFeminists21/04/22 12:03 PM
1

It is legal, remember my years of playing rugby on icey grass and tennis on icey tarmac. It was fun, but holy fuck did we get hurt.
/r/AntiFeminists21/04/22 10:43 AM
1

It ain't easy, civilization (modern-ish society) was made by men for women, not to say women had it easy. It was intended to make keeping women safe from predators and nature easier for men it's why men majority of the time held power trouble was these men - just as today - only have their own interests at heart and are willing to drag anyone through dirt to maintain it... that's what's made it hard for all of us. We're victims of a generational scarring of near 6'000 year long patriarchy, while…
/r/AntiFeminists21/04/22 10:42 AM
3

You went with the gal that wanted to party, I go for gals that want tea and a book... different types different outcomes.
/r/AntiFeminists21/04/22 10:22 AM
2

Gotta be honest 8 years ain't breaking any records my guy, and if you're talking about freedom... that's on who you chose and if you have kids.
/r/AntiFeminists21/04/22 09:07 AM
1

Then you have already lost
/r/AntiFeminists21/04/22 08:59 AM
1

Or be careful with who you pick
/r/AntiFeminists21/04/22 08:45 AM
0

You really don't know the life I've lived and don't even try to pretend you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 03:00 AM
2

One thing though, feminine hygiene products should be tax-free and contraceptives would be publicly funded to reduce prices. That decreases abortion rates, controls over-population, and gives women more choices. This! So much better than either taxing half the population that won't use them or taxing half the population that needs them!
/r/MensRights20/04/22 10:58 PM
1

Don't see how "they" doesn't fit there. If you don't know a person's gender/sex then probably best to avoid pronouns and just refer to them in the 3rd person singular.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 10:15 PM
1

No it's simple... you don't lie, it's cowardly and shows that you can't accept the consequences of your actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/22 05:41 PM
1

I'm done, I'm refuse to talk to someone that will justify lying.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/22 05:39 PM
7

This is simply the best win-win men have the right to information and women have the right of choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/22 05:26 PM
1

This doesn't make much sense. Can you explain what you mean or reword it? "This is going to happen, whether you like it or not" Probably better to phrase it another why when actually talking about it, but make them realise and accept that in this situation you're doing what you're going to. don't believe it doesn give your relationship the best chance of survival. Like I said, if he can't forgive you after you've already entwined your bonds and lived half your lives together, why would he forgiv…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/22 05:23 PM
1

What? You can talk about something and still do something else after the discussion. People lie or simply reach an impasse all the time. If you hit an impasse then you just turn stubborn, it's healthier than lying. Sure, but let's not pretend that's the same thing as being better for the relationship... It gives the relationship better chances of survival. It's a fairly simple concept, you want the relationship to carry on... don't break your partners trust. If it's between being with them and g…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/22 05:11 PM
2

I love my username, the xbox 360 random name generater did me well.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/22 05:03 PM
11

Not really, that shit hurts when a guy doesn't know what he's doing.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/22 05:01 PM
1

Disagree, one person wanting to preserve the relationship and the other wanting to break up isn't exactly being on the same page... Better him knowing it's going to happen. I'm guessing it was already talked about since in the scenario we know he wanted the child. Not really well talked through if you're still going behind his back and lying about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/22 05:00 PM
1

Productive to what end? Being on the same page, with what you're going to do. I mean, aborting a man's wanted child is probably more damaging than the lie lol Not if you talked about it before hand, he could say and do what he liked but as long as you tell him what you're going to do, his reaction after will be on him. It's about covering your end and making sure that you're doing what you can to make sure things don't go wrong, blatant lies don't help this.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/22 04:48 PM
0

I always pay, I asked, planned and did everything bar her getting ready and showing up. It was my idea I pay, it goes vice versa
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/22 04:40 PM
1

And talking about it would be much more productive. Doesn't matter when or how you look at it, lying is a relationship is always damaging... early on it sets a bad standard and later on it ruins any foundation of trust that was there before.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/22 04:38 PM
2

Trouble is completely lying about something like this is just as bad a cheating, it's still a complete betrayal of trust and will forever damage how he feels about you.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/22 04:34 PM
1

You got better chances telling him directly, especially before hand.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/22 04:22 PM
3

I'd say it's better to do that, imagine what would happen if he found out that you went behind his back.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/22 04:18 PM
0

Personally, I (21) prefer women 20-30 and men 40-60
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/22 03:34 PM
9

It's the simple fact where if you can't be honest with yourself, how can you be honest with others?
/r/MensRights20/04/22 03:32 PM
-10

They is plural and singular. They don't know, refers to either one or multiple people. Pick up a dictionary.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 02:21 PM
32

Most dating apps just validate that looks are a person's most important trait when this couldn't be less true.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 12:04 AM
1

Exactly
/r/MensRights18/04/22 07:42 PM
1

So are they just Anti-porn or do they just hate men using porn? Anti-porn Also what with the young teacher post and why do they assume male students will start SA female teachers over porn? It's mixed there's a few extremists there who's intentions aren't the purist, but that's with every community. There's a theme though where SA and sexual harassment are interchangeable words... so it'll skew the conversations interms of semantics at times. I do have my own sub that is about reforming porn reg…
/r/MensRights18/04/22 07:24 PM
2

I play the size rule, I'm 6'5" anyone who's smaller is getting pushed away male or female and anyone around my size or bigger is getting clocked.
/r/MensRights17/04/22 12:09 PM
2

r/PornIsMisogyny tends to be good with varied posts and opinions, but they'll usually ask that you go to an actual porn debate sub if you're opinion is too different.
/r/MensRights17/04/22 10:45 AM
0

If anything woman should be the offensive world.
/r/AntiFeminists17/04/22 10:35 AM
4

I spend more than my girl, but then 90% of money for luxuries are towards her luxuries... so... yeah, there's that.
/r/AntiFeminists16/04/22 04:10 PM
2

didn't meet the legal definition of rape That's why 0% of female on male rape charges in the UK aren't "true".
/r/AntiFeminists15/04/22 12:42 PM
2

A) 2% are false B) 8% are true So what about the other 90%?
/r/AntiFeminists15/04/22 11:34 AM
3

Look at the word's etymology, originally just described people that ran from a fight... it's latter adaptation is a product of society shaming Men to be willing to die in battle.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 01:19 AM
8

Yeah
/r/MensRights14/04/22 01:05 AM
2

Forcing people who don't want to fight is just poor strategy. I'm still confused on why people think I disagree with this, I don't.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 10:57 PM
-11

That's not cowardice or bravery, that's just being or not being a bully.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 10:44 PM
-13

I don't know about you, but I don't start fights I don't intend to finish. That's just fucking smart. To the rest, yeah; you are a coward. I never said being a coward is bad though. As I said, the coward always survives... to me having, a trait almost guarantees your survival is a good thing. Personally I would fight, but that's my choice... it's not bravery that makes me fight, it's necessity, we need people who don't want to fight but are willing to.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 10:40 PM
-33

Coward is a valid description, but then again the coward always survives. Anyone to call you a traitor is just fucking stupid.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 05:28 PM
2

He definitely doesn't have the most honest intentions with his values judging by what he said in 2017.
/r/AntiFeminists13/04/22 10:52 AM
4

And yet feminist spaces seem to be rife with them
/r/AntiFeminists12/04/22 11:22 AM
7

True, but the 'good' Christians weeded out the bad while feminists just turn a blind eye, justify or straight up deny bad feminists existence.
/r/AntiFeminists12/04/22 11:10 AM
–

Really want to bring law into it? Under UK law 'MEN CAN'T BE RAPED!'
/r/AntiFeminists12/04/22 11:07 AM
10

Ummm, yeah it does... russian woman shit and killed several school boys in the name of feminism.
/r/AntiFeminists12/04/22 11:01 AM
26

Feminism only aims to benefit women to where they're equal to men, if it overshoots and privileges women over men it doesn't care.
/r/AntiFeminists12/04/22 09:19 AM
29

Nowadays alot of people you see calling themselves feminists are just man-haters, the 2 are nearing perfect alignment.
/r/AntiFeminists12/04/22 08:20 AM
57

Is it me or does it look like she shouldn't be our in public without a carer?
/r/AntiFeminists12/04/22 07:10 AM
7

Also phrasing. What does "only 2% are false" make you think? Or What does "only 8% are true" make you think? It's a classic case of lieing through the truth.
/r/AntiFeminists12/04/22 05:45 AM
6

As I said, 2% are proven false and 8% are proven true, the other 90% are inconclusive due to lack of evidence. E.g. Say there's 400 cases: 8 are proven false 32 are proven true the other 360? We don't know, not enough evidence to decide.
/r/AntiFeminists12/04/22 04:54 AM
1

INFANT-ASTIC!
/r/AntiFeminists12/04/22 04:46 AM
2

The world was killing us long before civilization, and civilization (if anything) has saved us with longer lifespans, better quality of life, etc.
/r/AntiFeminists12/04/22 04:38 AM
5

PRESUMED innocent until PROVEN guilty It's why 2% of rape cases are false and 8% are true the other 90% are deemed inconclusive due to lack of evidence and as such are assumed innocent, neither false nor true.
/r/AntiFeminists12/04/22 04:33 AM
13

Anger leads to hate, hate leads to suffering. The roman soldier will bully and torture you for a mile but after you offer them the second mile, they'll be quiet and humbled. Going through something is more reason to not put others through it.
/r/AntiFeminists12/04/22 04:29 AM
3

FDS *diet
/r/AntiFeminists11/04/22 02:08 PM
1

Damaged goods? You mean rotten bads!
/r/MensRights10/04/22 03:57 PM
3

Or justify it by saying that they were just competing in a man's world.
/r/AntiFeminists10/04/22 12:43 PM
5

Trouble is, when your personal demographic fits in one movement you develop a belief that that specific movement is most important and top priority... which is where the "It's about so and so too." = "In reality I'm all for equality everywhere, I just want my problems solved first." But... then there's the extremists that ruin it for everyone.
/r/MensRights10/04/22 01:11 AM
24

Because feminism isn't about men and women being equal, it's able making women equal to men. Any advantage women already have doesn't matter to feminism, all it cares about is when men have the advantage. Same MRA, can easily bet 99% of us are also for women's rights but that's not what MRA is about. MRA, just as feminism is gender-centrised.
/r/MensRights09/04/22 10:06 PM
1

Sorry but no, crowly is too cool to be associated both the good omens and supernatural versions.
/r/AntiFeminists07/04/22 11:33 PM
3

Only time I call myself a feminist is when we're talking about an actual women's only issue... same goes for MRA all other times it's egalitarian.
/r/AntiFeminists05/04/22 01:45 PM
1

He's not even saying that, there's a sense of in honour in the people that follow what said in your comment. What he's saying is just some bullshit excuse to get away with whatever negative traits ye has.
/r/MensRights04/04/22 12:16 AM
2

It's weakness, they're to weak to do something so final and hard.
/r/AntiFeminists03/04/22 08:27 PM
1

It's perspective, men and women do things in almost completely different ways, as such to men it looks like women will do things too complicated and men do things to lazily.
/r/MensRights03/04/22 06:31 PM
1

Well... I guess that's some form of positive thought.
/r/AntiFeminists03/04/22 04:49 PM
2

You lot have the innate ability to not be phased when shit hits the fan, the trait wouldn't have survived for so long if it wasn't helpful.
/r/AntiFeminists03/04/22 04:32 PM
2

Pessimists are needed, they keep us optimists on the ground... but then that might just be an optimistic view.
/r/AntiFeminists03/04/22 04:26 PM
2

I find it's truly a case where opposites attract, you need both perspectives to not only be happy but ready for anything.
/r/AntiFeminists03/04/22 04:11 PM
2

Just means one of you are ready for when things go well and the other is ready when things go wrong.
/r/AntiFeminists03/04/22 04:04 PM
2

End of the day, we all do. He'll have plenty of demons himself and doing the same as you.
/r/AntiFeminists03/04/22 04:00 PM
2

That's a good man there then.
/r/AntiFeminists03/04/22 03:56 PM
6

Also you have the secure knowledge that you both agree on a world... usually
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/22 03:27 PM
2

Depends on what you have as a living situation, my fiancé is entitled to a heavy amount of my money because I'm the one who works
/r/AntiFeminists03/04/22 02:48 PM
1

Aka: have some fucking confidence and show women you know what you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/22 03:39 AM
3

In other words: We'll discriminate you based on something you have no control over. Didn't know the was still the 1800's
/r/AntiFeminists03/04/22 12:07 AM
3

Nothing is inherently good or evil, it's use and purpose defines whether it is or isn't. Both masculinity and feminity have capability of being good or bad, it's down to the individual on how it's used.
/r/AntiFeminists02/04/22 09:35 PM
0

Kinda does, but it's more that some people use masculine traits in a toxic way.
/r/AntiFeminists02/04/22 07:40 PM
1

There's outliers on every graph.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/22 11:39 AM
2

No, I will because it's a mentality shared across Europe. The key difference is in the minimum wages. Look at the homeless population and minimum wages by EU nations and you'll find the pattern where the lower the minimum is the more homeless there are.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/22 11:33 AM
1

Comparing the EU to US isn't that easy.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/22 11:24 AM
2

Fair play, my ancestors from there.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/22 10:55 AM
1

Fair play, which side of the channel?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/22 10:49 AM
9

It's not the only one with the rule.
/r/AntiFeminists02/04/22 10:48 AM
1

Very European of you, you need to watch it before Uncle Sam hears...
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/22 10:41 AM
13

Don't know if they still have the rule but it was originally women only.
/r/AntiFeminists02/04/22 10:40 AM
2

That's one of the reasons certain of my coworkers get more tips, plus the fact that we don't have to wear our uniform a certain way.
/r/AntiFeminists02/04/22 01:15 AM
2

Is for those of us loyal to the Crown.
/r/AntiFeminists01/04/22 01:39 PM
2

European America with a monarch... more or less.
/r/AntiFeminists01/04/22 12:28 PM
2

Live in the most Conservative area of England, this double standard still exists here.
/r/AntiFeminists01/04/22 12:24 PM
2

The word staunch tells you everything.
/r/AntiFeminists01/04/22 12:23 PM
3

She justifies her hatred of men with her love of women. Try and find a single situation where a man gets away with doing the same, we wouldn't.
/r/AntiFeminists01/04/22 12:18 PM
5

I'm mad because of the blatant double standard, imagine a guy trying to get away with saying this. He wouldn't he'd be dragged through the dirt, and so should she.
/r/AntiFeminists01/04/22 12:06 AM
0

My fiancé did this but ended up accidentally becoming MRA while dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/22 04:35 PM
1

I would say I disagree but then... I've only ever dated Eastern European women, so no experience here.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/22 04:17 PM
8

Probably women's studies or what ever they call that over priced indoctrination program nowadays.
/r/AntiFeminists31/03/22 02:36 PM
11

Will do!
/r/AntiFeminists31/03/22 01:41 PM
12

I've have said to people you're a 4 chasing 9's either work on yourself or lower your standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/22 09:51 AM
2

I cannot type apparently
/r/AntiFeminists28/03/22 08:55 PM
0

I'm defending a violent reaction, I'm just stating why jokes about bald women hit harder.
/r/AntiFeminists28/03/22 07:48 PM
0

The rarity is what makes the joke hit different.
/r/AntiFeminists28/03/22 05:53 PM
1

There's snowflakes on both sides.
/r/AntiFeminists25/03/22 09:54 AM
2

Just no sense.
/r/AntiFeminists25/03/22 09:52 AM
-2

Yeah, it's why I change my spelling on reddit. American site, American English. Well, unless it's r/Wales or r/England or something.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 12:56 AM
50

Pedophile, the word is pedophile
/r/MensRights23/03/22 02:09 PM
3

No, we have our own issues that need fixing.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 12:25 AM
1

Reddit feminists aren't a good way to judge feminists anyway, there's some good ones on here sure... but the real feminists aren't bitching and moaning on the internet, they're actually doing things in the real. The majority of which won't even call themselves feminists, because of how the extreme has bastardised the word.
/r/MensRights22/03/22 10:52 PM
3

The last draft was Vietnam...
/r/MensRights22/03/22 10:46 PM
1

That's where we have the problem.
/r/MensRights22/03/22 05:56 PM
1

Either way, we're talking about the time when all feminism did was benefit women, not effecting men in anyway... good nor bad.
/r/MensRights22/03/22 04:43 PM
1

Civilian ship got attacked by U-boats, not exactly pearl harbour level, but still an attack.
/r/MensRights22/03/22 04:25 PM
2

Which with the titanic... only time this order was actually given... happened, the staff knew the boats could fit more people but still left men aboard the sinking ship.
/r/MensRights22/03/22 04:15 PM
1

America wasn't attacked in ww2? Or do you mean the current conflict?
/r/MensRights22/03/22 03:12 PM
-18

I get where you're coming from and I agree... but if the building is in fire or the ship is sinking, I'm still letting everyone get to safety before me. That's my job as a male, to make sure everyone else is safe, the key part is that all males do this to each other.
/r/MensRights22/03/22 02:54 AM
-4

You're not wrong, it's a completely different culture. One built around capability and not potential. They see what's there and use it to their strength.
/r/MensRights22/03/22 01:36 AM
-1

I'm in a similar position, but when it comes to it... send the children to the rural areas, eldest of the lot on the farmland... throw every able bodied man and woman in factories and on the front line, if the war is that desperate then it's desperate for everyone. You fight as a nation, not as a gender because it'll be not just the loss of rights but the homeland, art, music... everything. Once there's a draft, it's for everyone.
/r/MensRights22/03/22 01:33 AM
109

Last time there was a draft was when not enough men freely chose to go to war... I wonder when the next one will be.
/r/MensRights22/03/22 01:29 AM
8

Because it's a disorder not easily understood
/r/MensRights21/03/22 03:15 PM
1

We traded strength for dexterity, tool making and endurance. We can't out run most animals but we can out pace all of them.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 12:48 PM
-1

Eh, more likely to be accidentally shot by someone in my hunting party.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 12:38 AM
-1

Be ironic considering I come from a heavily gun regulated nation
/r/MensRights21/03/22 12:34 AM
-2

Why, because you can't accept the fact that it's takes alot more time for a woman to create a child than a man, and because of this, as long as there are enough males in a species to kept the gene pool healthy, the rest of us are extra.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 12:31 AM
-4

I'm terribly sorry but a uterus has alot more value than a testicle, just basic maths.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 04:59 PM
1

Let me rephrase. Besides reproduction, everything else mammalian societies need benefit from a equal-ish number of males and females. Also mammals have only been around for 250-ish million years, and mammalian gender dimorphism not fully showing until around 100 million years ago so 4 billion is a grossly inaccurate number in this sense.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 04:46 PM
5

Different species need a different ratio of males to females, apes usually need 1:10 for the gene pool to stay healthy. But, that's just for mating, when it comes to everything else males do; it's best that we have as many as possible. It's less that we're disposable and more just replaceable. It's a game of numbers, a game that civilization should have killed off.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 01:24 PM
6

Look at any mammalian species, it's there. It's arguably the only one of two reasons our gender exists, originally at least. However, I would argue that it's a trait of our species that is no longer needed, we are populous enough and developed enough to the point where one gender being designed to die fighting predators shouldn't even have to be something we talk about (outside of anthropology)
/r/MensRights20/03/22 01:04 PM
21

It depends on perspective and definition. Defining patriarchy as male dominance through population than... sport, work, military would be patriarchal. Defining it as male dominance through control, than some nations would be... but no egalitarian, democratic nation would.
/r/MensRights16/03/22 11:20 PM
1

That's why the collection of documents that act as a constitution for the UK actually aren't a constitution.
/r/AntiFeminists14/03/22 10:46 AM
2

A constitution signed and controlled by who. Besides England doesn't even have a constitution, we have 6 documents. The magna carta, is considered the closest to a constitution and all that is, is a declaration of rights and protectorates.
/r/AntiFeminists13/03/22 11:02 AM
1

The monarch still holds absolute power, Parliament cannot do anything without the monarch's permission to the extent where Parliament is not allowed to declare war, only the monarch can. Elizabeth I comes from the time when Parliament was an oligarchy and when the monarchy have full control. Hell, Parliament can even open without the monarch's permission. The difference today is that while the monarchy still holds absolute power, Parliament and the monarch will work together and cooperate throug…
/r/AntiFeminists13/03/22 10:34 AM
2

In England's history this is true, majority of wars occurring under Elizabeth I was because of King's in other nations starting wars.
/r/AntiFeminists12/03/22 05:57 PM
1

I'm actually intrigued with what you mean by good example, I mean I'm taoist but even then there would still be punishment with forgiveness.
/r/AntiFeminists12/03/22 12:54 PM
8

I'm in no condition to talk about this, I've read you reply 5 times and keep reading pizza instead of burger.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/22 05:06 PM
10

You misunderstood by understanding this perfectly. You see the Beef and want the burger because the beef is the flavour or in this analogy, the personality; while the tomato slice is just a part of the entire package.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/22 05:01 PM
6

Issue I see with typically is that everyone tends to just name one group as being oppressed when for 90% of history it was every group was oppressed by one.
/r/MensRights07/03/22 08:54 PM
15

Majority of men got the same rights around the same time, got to remember before then, if you weren't an aristocratic male - you didn't have rights.
/r/MensRights07/03/22 08:09 PM
1

Yeah, shame all context of what I was arguing was lost.
/r/MensRights07/03/22 07:52 PM
1

Yeah, but the original fella was talking about how women getting the destroyed the nuclear family and the only correlation to suggest it was divorce rates... which rose shortly after a vote nearly 100 years later. The guy was just a misogynist trying to find an excuse for his contempt.
/r/MensRights07/03/22 07:09 PM
2

The 60's was when no fault divorces were made available.
/r/MensRights07/03/22 06:28 PM
1

In Britain we left leaving the monarchs in order to a surprisingly accurate children's sketch comedy... instead of having the UK education system.
/r/MensRights05/03/22 09:12 PM
1

It's either pheromones... or... brie
/r/MensRights05/03/22 09:11 PM
1

Guessing that's the difference, I was looking at percentage of marriages that end in divorce... not the raw divorce rate.
/r/MensRights04/03/22 08:20 PM
1

They rose shortly after "No-fault" divorces became an option.
/r/MensRights04/03/22 07:51 PM
6

Divorce rates rose nearly 100 years after the 19th amendment... try again.
/r/MensRights04/03/22 03:50 PM
3

How exactly?
/r/MensRights04/03/22 03:23 PM
6

Not being American I had to search this and no, you're a fucking wanker.
/r/MensRights04/03/22 02:53 PM
1

That's where my ideology and your reasoning match, you're last sentence. If the Queen were to plea, I believe it would be a situation where the UK has started to lose the war or when the war has took a turn to where it is a very likely probability that the people of the UK would be threatened. Not the same threat you mean, but a threat none the less.
/r/AntiFeminists28/02/22 06:01 PM
1

Not even draft, just a plea on radio or news is enough for me.
/r/AntiFeminists28/02/22 05:45 PM
1

Yeah, the arguing maintaining ideology in this situation is very much hard to do, I've always said that I wouldn't go to war but if the Queen said I'd do. Just waiting for the order...
/r/AntiFeminists28/02/22 09:21 AM
7

Which is what traditional women were doing in the WW's
/r/AntiFeminists28/02/22 09:12 AM
1

Could imagine forest men it is same reason but for me it's a bit different.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 07:37 PM
1

Not for me, got a really bad natural smell... always need to make sure it's not there.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 07:30 PM
10

Yeah because we're able to actually admit it's an archaic and barbaric practice.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 03:02 PM
23

Believe it or not, there is dick soap
/r/MensRights27/02/22 01:45 PM
39

Why can't the men wash their own, it's basic fucking hygiene
/r/MensRights27/02/22 01:43 PM
0

I have noticed a growing number in reasonable feminists, as small as that number is... it is growing. I don't believe either side is ready right now for some form of cooperation bur I do believe in the future it'll be possible.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 01:37 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter