TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TiaThrowaway123456 Archive

View 4 posts and 22 comments by TiaThrowaway123456 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

" Yes you are correct, that woman make up most graduates at least in the US.' The problems with education are much more important (and much more in depth) than you have portrayed them here. In fact teachers grade students differently based on whether they are boys or girls starting well before university. This paper describes bias that exists in teachers of 12-year-olds, and of course it negatively affects boys. SEII Discussion Paper link That is only a small example of the sort of problems bein…
/r/MensRights22/02/26 07:38 PM
5

You made an effort for this post, so I guess I will too. "On the off chance that im not gonna get shadow banned within 5 minutes of posting this" First mistake - anti-feminists tend towards strong commitments to free speech and open discussion. You clearly do not understand the attitudes of the people you are trying to talk to. " A distributional perspective of the most recent data shows that about 94 percent of countries had positive employment gender gaps in 2022, with men more likely to be em…
/r/MensRights22/02/26 07:37 PM
6

Very true, but it is enormously influential in society today, hence the relevance of this video. An idea does not have to be true to have an impact, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights20/02/26 11:44 PM
10

A 2-hour long video where the intrepid Honeybadgers (Alison Tieman and Brian Martinez) team up with the most cerebral of cervids, TL;DR, to investigate how psychoanalytic feminism misinforms psychology and arrives at truly ridiculous and harmful conclusions about men's psychology. Featuring some ideas from Freud and Lacan, badly mangled by a bunch of misandrists.
/r/MensRights20/02/26 10:08 PM
1

Fair - but if a widespread ideology causes its adherents to become psychologically unstable, then not only is it harmful to them, but it can be damaging to society as a whole. Another reason to be anti-feminist!
/r/MensRights31/10/25 03:02 PM
2

Adding this cause my original post may have been removed: ou should check out the Honey Badger Discord. They have been working at creating pro-men/antifeminist content for many years now and are well worth checking out. Their content is on youtube or rumble and various podcast sites (Try 'Badger Live Streams' on yt, 'hbradio' on rumble). And the discord itself is accessible through membership on their patreon, which you can find with honeybadgerradio at patreon. It's also for socializing and sha…
/r/MensRights03/10/25 01:15 AM
1

I don't have the time to reply point by point, especially since you are being deliberately obtuse about many points concerning feminism. Some thoughts though: Well, I guess I take this stuff more seriously than you. Men are not begrudgingly giving women anything that they do not receive benefits from themselves. I could switch the genders on this one easily. Do you honestly think women don't benefit from men working while they stay home? In 2012, 57.7% of women were in the workforce in the US, c…
/r/MensRights19/06/15 03:37 AM
2

Most of these jobs are old-boys clubs that actively make it difficult for women to be hired or work in them. Feminism isn't about exhorting anyone. Feminists say this about literally every job. There is a degree of truth in this, but considering how feminists are indeed exhorting women to enter into the STEM fields, the military, firefighting, and government positions (usually by lowering every standard they can find), the second sentence of yours I quoted is obviously false. How can feminists h…
/r/MensRights18/06/15 04:08 PM
3

It is my experience that most feminists are interested in supporting men's rights, even insofar as men also benefit from the move towards treating women equally (which includes being equally malevolent in crime, not necessarily more nurturing than men etc.) or veer towards seeing them as less of a priority rather than censoring them at least, rather than being hostile about them. The move towards treating women equally? I'll believe that when I see feminists exhorting women to take on dangerous …
/r/MensRights18/06/15 12:04 PM
1

I've even gone out of my way to ask my fiance what his thoughts were on the matter, and he answers with shrugs and silence at best. That's probably wise of him. Nobody really wants to piss off their wife. I wish you'd responded to some more of my post rather than just talking about the physical appearance aspect, but you clearly read it and put some thought into your response, so I appreciate that. And I do recommend you check out Karen Straughan's youtube channel, she's longwinded but very inte…
/r/MensRights09/06/15 11:52 PM
1

Or, should there be certain masculine or feminine aspects that do carry shame? If so, which ones? And how do we determine that? Personality traits should be reined in if they do harm. Greed should be controlled and directed, as should competitiveness, and so should vanity and emotional weakness, to give some examples. Excess is the problem, most of the time. Honestly how do we even determine what is strictly masculine an feminine in the first place? Precedence? We are conscious beings, all of us…
/r/MensRights09/06/15 09:39 PM
2

But, I have to ask, is that to say that women don't have the same desire, or, if they do, that they are then portraying innately masculine traits? If a woman portrays the desire to improve, to become stronger, to protect those she loves and herself, does that then mean she is stepping outside the boundaries of her gender and, perhaps, risking becoming undesirable to men by stepping forward, taking responsibility, and engaging in the "struggle" as he describes it? Just giving my opinion here, for…
/r/MensRights09/06/15 09:07 PM
1

One thing that I have noticed in my discussions with feminists on reddit is that they very quickly start ignoring large parts of my arguments, even when I give very careful attention to all of theirs. Anyway: It just so happens that the most frequently criticized aspects of feminism (at least by non-feminists) is of the extremist fringe that most feminists don't follow and want nothing to do with. The same extremist fringe that got the Duluth Model for Domestic violence into use as the standard …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/15 11:08 PM
3

I mean, I guess. I disagree, but whatever. I asked. Please do watch the lecture by Robert Sapolsky. He is an excellent educator. You will learn a lot, I'm sure. (Seriously, lectures from Stanford free for anyone who wants them. What a time to be alive!) (Also, cats. And porn. This is the internet, after all). Within the context of their time, they worked to abolish gender roles. No, they worked to modify the legal status of women. They liked gender roles just fine for the most part. This termino…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/15 10:38 PM
4

This is an example of the kind of specific gender roles that Feminism has always worked to end. So are the rest of your examples. I disagree about who is "hurt worse" by rigid gender roles, but either way, the only seriously organized movement to abolish them is being mounted by Feminism. I feel like posting the 'No U' guy here. I specifically mentioned that it was feminists doing those things - and has been for a while. Not that they were the only ones. I also asserted that feminism is not a mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/15 09:57 PM
-1

Forgot to add stuff about women's appearance: You assert that all women have ever had was appearance. This is false. The ability to keep house (which meant food preparation and clothing manufacture and canning and candlemaking and mending and washing and medical care and butchering and baking and...) was a massive source of female enticement. Men still appreciate a woman who can cook. The fact that you think women become worthless as they age strongly reflects your own prejudices, in my opinion.…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/15 09:38 PM
1

The fact that there are men who don't share in the highest echelons of power doesn't disprove the idea of a patriarchy. The OP posted this article which goes into great detail on how patriarchy is a system which not only places men above women but pits men against other men for power (which women often did not even have access to, such as being a soldier or politician or scholar). Based on the article's contents, that Pleck guy didn't have many male friends growing up. Why does he think that men…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/15 09:24 PM
3

That doesn't really answer anything... beyond saying, "That's the way things are." 'Biology and environmental circumstances' is a pretty clear attribution of cause. Try watching the Sapolsky lecture. It won't bite you. If I said, 'because men and women are affected by different DNA and hormone levels starting in the womb, causing them to react in different ways to their environment, which can also change and affect them in that way', would you consider that a better answer? Those tricky feminist…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/15 08:09 PM
3

Just found this comment and I really have to give you a reply here: If you don't accept the basic framework of Feminism (that a society in which men hold most of the power hurts everyone, but hurts women worse), Objectively speaking, in our society, men are hurt worse. We are killed and injured more often in every conceivable situation, we work ourselves to death more, we are given fewer resources to help us or protect us when we are vulnerable or in need, and we are punished more harshly for ou…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/15 07:41 PM
3

What's your alternative theory? A lot of these disparities are more the result of our biology and our environmental circumstances than feminists would like to admit. They invariably privilege (hahaha) the idea that self-reinforcing stereotypes are the cause of absolutely everything. This is an ideologically convenient position for feminists, but it is not backed up by facts. I would recommend this lecture to start with. It's a class at Stanford. I've given you feminism's solution (let's work to …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/15 07:25 PM
7

1) women receive shorter sentences for the same crimes because society views women as less likely and capable of committing crimes. This is a result of traditional gender roles. Feminists have repeatedly asked for women to be treated more leniently than men. This is one example.This is another. 2) men are more likely to be both perpetrators and victims of violence because they have been socialized toward violence where women are socialized to passivity. This is an expression of the influence of …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/15 06:55 PM
1

The concept of Patriarchy is not really about handing out responsibility or guilt to men. And yet it always seems to be used this way. Think of patriarchy as a system that grooms people for two separate roles. One set of people is groomed to be leaders and doers who hold public power and have agency, and the other to be the caretakers who serve others and aid the agency of others. The overwhelming majority of men never come close to holding a position of public power, nor are they particularly '…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/15 05:57 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter