TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Tiasmoon Archive

View 0 posts and 32 comments by Tiasmoon on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

They are refering to the mental/spiritual nature of human beings. Ergo, what truly defines us more then anything else, is not a question of gender/sex. This is very true. However that doesnt take away that there's a huge degree of social indoctrination present in modern culture which results in men and women generally having very different perspectives on the world. (this is a spectrum, the degree of indoctrination differs from person to person) Ofcourse, all of this aside from the actual biolog…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 04:03 PM
1

How do I explain such similarities? Its simple. If you dont want the other, more disadvantaged side, to be validated; then claim your side has the same issues. As a result the optics will be that both sides are equal. If both sides are equal, then a disadvantaged side does not have to gain more advantages, and an advantaged side does not have to lose its advantages. In other words what is happening is a pretense of equality in order to prevent the status quo from being changed. Because those tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 03:59 PM
2

The Truth of the world doesnt care for your narrative.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 03:50 PM
3

Believing in equal rights can be seen as being ''feminist under the umbrella of being an idealist''. So technically, yes that would be the case. Practically speaking however, feminism is considered having a bias towards women's rights. Considering in the current world women already have more rights, priviledges, less obligations and more social influence, I personally consider any current day feminist, ignorant or delusional at best. Because being a feminist today means you dont believe in equal…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 03:48 PM
1

We are calling you (a feminist) a liar. Not women. Unless you are self-reporting that unlike your claim to be a man, you are actually a woman? Hence why you automatically assume feminist=woman, because you are looking at it from a purely personal perspective?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 03:34 PM
1

Hate is a spectrum, not a binary does/doesnt. All feminists have some degree of either hate towards men, desire for the superiority of women, or delusion. Why? Well because you need either of those to be pro women's rights (as opposed to be pro-all rights) in a post-modern world where women have more rights/priviledges, a lot less responsibility and a lot more social influence, then men do. Its akin to supporting the winning team and arguing they should have even more advantages in a world where…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 03:25 PM
2

Not to mention many men haters get with men so they can abuse and exploit them.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 03:16 PM
1

I mean. All slave owners were with slaves..
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 03:15 PM
4

Boy, wait till you hear about actual genocides and wars being commited by blue pillers in the world goverments.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 03:13 PM
1

Most red pilled people (not just men) dont agree with the manosphere. But given the manosphere is the opposition to the mainstream narrative, it still needs to exist as counter force. Even if most consider it too radical. Because the manosphere does not dominate the media, entertainment and public perception as a whole. Radical feminism, does.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 03:11 PM
1

Those are just the lies told in order to discredit her intent and manipulate what people believe. You should do your own research, not just blindly repeat what obvious heavily biased/invested people tell you about something. Hardcore feminists dont allow the notion that woman also cause abuse, to exist. Period.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 03:08 PM
1

This seems like gaslighting to me. The feminist spaces ive been to actively participate in man-hating. Its long since reached the point where many women dont want to associate themselves with feminists anymore, even if they are (obviously) pro women's rights themselves. Being a feminist in this day and age is at best equal to wanting women to be priviledged first class and men oppressed second class, and at worst being a man-hater. Anyone that genuinely cares about rights wouldn't single out a s…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 03:06 PM
1

A Fetus is not ''an organ'' its a living creature. What you are doing is intentionally dehumanising the baby in order to make you seem like you aren't arguing in favor of murdering the innocent. What is more, you are essentially describing the baby like its some kind of malicious parasite. Disgusting. The ability to give birth is a miracle that men will never get to experience. Its not some curse women can be inflicted by.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 02:56 PM
1

You mean the right to legally murder babies?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 02:45 PM
3

It gets better once you realise the reason we arent allowed to criticise that religion can be traced back to the liberal/socialist..radical women that are in control of the narrative. There's some kind of unholy alliance between them and the radical islamists.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 02:43 PM
2

Gaslighting is also something that inherently women do much more often then men. Its psychological/social violence. In contrast men are much more likely to commit physical violence. This is actually a huge issue. We have laws that aim to prevent physical violence. And ofcourse on the internet its physically impossible to commit regardless. But even so, open ''violent'' behaviour is against the rules in most places. However there are no laws or rules against gaslighting/lying/psychological manipu…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 02:18 PM
3

Claiming that is kind of disingenious when you ignore that many of the bad actors have positions of influence or power. Its not like they are some loud minority that doesnt matter. They are a loud minority that is very capable of influencing many millions of people. Especially women. This is because they are in media, institutions (like education, see ''gender studies'' and most ''social studies'') and even important goverment positions. They are even in censoring agencies like the ones that pro…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 02:00 PM
3

They were the core of feminism from the start of the movement. What was taken over wasnt feminism.. it was the group identity of women and the right to represent women.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 05:23 AM
3

Ah yes, the feminist (read: narcisist) MO: its not you who are wrong, no you will instead gaslight the entire world into believing *they* are the ones that are wrong. You practice a hell of a lot of gaslighting and Deflection through Projection in pretty much every comment you make.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 05:16 AM
7

How much of that is you projecting that, versus them actually writing that? In TwoXChromosomes people flat out write these things. No projection or even interpretation required. And its not a few comments either. Its almost every one of them. In fact if someone disagrees and has a less hateful comment, they will get bombarded with downvotes.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 05:12 AM
3

I'm surprised to see someone recognise that trans/woke is ultimately a Feminist agenda. From what ive seen this has really been flying under the radar for pretty much everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 04:58 AM
6

The outliers can be found in goverment agencies, NGOs, institutions and media. Oh and entertainment as well. So you tell how much of an excessive focus it is to focus on these ''outliers''. Its not like they are in every single important key aspect of society or anything. /s Yes it might only be 1% of women. But they are the 1% that has the most power.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 04:55 AM
1

Interesting. Claiming one political group is racist then in your next sentence being racist yourself. Saying low income neighbourhoods = black neighbourhoods is racist. You are suggesting low income neighbourhoods where white (or whatever) people live dont exist. And that high income neighbourhoods where black people live dont exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 04:50 AM
8

That's a disingenuous comparison. Straight men dont look for relationships with other men. Romantic or sexual relationships require a much more amicable attitudes between people. Ergo, if (straight) feminists attitudes towards men are the same as mens attitudes towards each other.. that means there is in fact a good amount of animosity present.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 04:45 AM
3

That's where you are misunderstanding something. Feminists dont have their own demons. They *are* the demons. A lot of the issues with society are a direct or indirect consequence of the feminist movement. Like for example the sexual revolution leading to decay of morals, leading to decay of family values, leading to more broken homes and less healthy relationships, leading to women holding a lot more power in social dynamics (relationship/sex/friendship), etc. Woke/DEI/ESG is another example of…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 04:09 AM
4

Your defination is correct, but you are wrong that its the best type of analysis. Its the worst. You dont have access to the full data sets that the original research used, you dont get to decide the methods used and whether were used correctly. Any bias will likely be transfered to your research. Then *on top* of that there's more inaccuracies and bias added as part of your own research. Meta-analysis are favored by hacks and people that aim to write a narrative since its much easier to change …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 03:40 AM
1

Deflection through projection.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 03:28 AM
1

since all the women on earth could be harrassing the crap out of me, and I would be in paradise and not feel one bit in danger. That's a very uh.. naive stance. Regardless if they are women or men, being singled out for extended periods of time will eventually break everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 03:21 AM
1

I'm sorry, but that second part is just bullshit. Almost all feminist places allow little counter argument against highly anti-men commentaries. Men's rights or issues? Show sympathy or understanding for men's perspective? You get laughed at. Nevermind stating the facts that in the modern world women have far more rights and far less responsibilities then men. Might as well say you love Hitler, you'd get friendlier and more welcoming replies.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 03:17 AM

Their point is that you dont understand what the word ''empathy'' means. If someone holds the same view as you, you dont empathise with them. You dont have to: because you have the same experience as them so you *know* what their experience is like. Empathizing is all about being open to experiences or views that are different from yours. Things that you dont already know about and havent experienced yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 02:56 AM
1

No, thats just you projecting and gaslighting. Which is all too common from feminists. Not surprising for members of a movement that proclaim to be in favor of ''woman's rights and issues'' or equality, at a time where women already have a lot more rights then men and a lot less responsibilities on top of them; the movement that also categorically denies men's rights or issues. Its a female supremacy/dominion and men-hating/oppression movement, nothing less, nothing more.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 02:48 AM
2

Just blame ''incels'' for it like a feminist does. Its like blaming Trump for everything (including Flooding, etc) like liberals does. Interestingly there's a lot of overlap with the 2 groups, so you can start to see what kind of people that behaviour comes from.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 02:40 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter