TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TicTokCroc Archive

View 1 posts and 181 comments by TicTokCroc on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

Is anyone who thinks it's absurd to celebrate cowards an internet tough guy?
/r/MensRights28/07/12 02:26 AM
-4

I thought I'd never see the day where r/mensrights would stoop to the actual celebration of a coward. I now have tears in my eyes. Well done, my friends, well done.
/r/MensRights28/07/12 02:02 AM
-4

Oh, I'm contributing all right. And where did you learn to talk like that? Too much sucking your father's cock I bet. Probably also where you got all those funny ideas about women from. He may have made you suck it, but I think swallowing was all your idea. Have a wonderful evening :)
/r/MensRights24/05/12 05:59 AM
-6

First of all, fuck you for being patronizing. Secondly, yeah, I'm aware there's a "discussion" (read circlejerk) going on here and all over r/mensrights. It's unfortunate that Reddit's become a refuge for this kind of bigotry but I guess it takes all kinds.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 05:25 AM
-5

Yes, I know that's a huge problem because the last draft occurred almost 40 years ago and we're in imminent danger of all our males being drafted into war. If that's the best r/mensrights can come up with, I guess we must not have it to bad. Real men don't hate women and apparently there aren't many real men around here. It's time for you all to grow the fuck up and climb down out of the treehouse.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 04:43 AM
-10

As a former Marine grunt, I find the whining of r/mensrights pretty goddamn pathetic, particularly when there are women Marines serving overseas while these pissants are sitting at home crying on the internet about how women don't go to war.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 03:35 AM
1

Maybe you shouldn't have married a child. Nobody deserves to be on the receiving end of an abusive spouse but some responsibility for what you're going through must fall on the person who chose to marry someone like your wife.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 09:14 PM
1

If it's child support then it's money for the purpose of supporting your children. Calling it her income doesn't change that they're your children and your income supports them.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 05:33 PM
-1

If what you're saying about temp orders are true then apparently I'm dead on about MS being a backwards state. The solution isn't going after women or going after the system for being biased towards women. Go after the state for not properly funding their court system.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 03:13 PM
0

Oh, so now it's your children's lifestyle, not your wife's. If that's what you meant don't twist the truth by saying something else.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 03:02 PM
0

Again, is it her house? Or do you own it with her jointly? Also, you're combining alimony and child support payments which are very different things. Alimony is not counted as part of your income because effectively that is considered the spouse who's receiving the alimony's income. Child support is your money that's being spent on your children so it counts as your income.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 02:51 PM
-2

Well, that's unfortunate but it probably has more to do with the Mississippi state system being underfunded, which is the result of any corrupt system where the rich don't pay their fair share (And the last time I checked MS was as red as it comes). In order to run a proper family court system everyone needs the right to go in and get protection in the form of a temporary restraining order, but the accused needs their day in court so it can be properly determined whether a permanent restraining …
/r/MensRights17/05/12 02:40 PM
-1

Lol. It sounds like the people close to you got off easy. Good for them. If it makes you feel better I'm sure you deserve every awful thing that's happened to you. If you want to make this about men and women, fine. The fact is the spouse making the highest income (yes, usually the male) makes out much better than the other spouse. To suggest otherwise is transparent propaganda, which also happens to be that whining noise you keep hearing :)
/r/MensRights17/05/12 02:59 AM
-2

Only an idiot would compare not liking their experience in the family court system to someone being raped. What a fucking moron. And, yes, people in family law cases see things from an emotional perspective and when they go online and start ranting about how they're the victims and the courts are all one-sided in favor of either sex, the veracity of their accounts certainly come into question. Your outrageous analogy is a perfect example of this kind of thinking.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 01:47 AM
-2

You having been through it once doesn't make you an expert, though people who think they've been through a divorce seem to think that's the case. I'm not an attorney but I've worked in law office on hundreds of family law cases and my opinions are based on facts and how the law actually works. Family law varies from state to state but the outrageous situations that are described in r/mensrights are fantasy at best.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 01:23 AM
-1

Lol. Abusive spouses who think they should just get everything they want HATE mediation because it forces them to operate in a world based on reality. Mediation is the best thing that's ever happened to the family court system.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 12:49 AM
-1

Yes, but the spouse who is "moving out" doesn't have to move out until the divorce is final so he/she would benefit from all those things if they stayed around. If you leave under your own volition then you have no business complaining about paying the household costs that you could just as easily be benefitting from.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 12:32 AM
-3

If that is true then Mississippi is an even more backwards state than I thought. It's insane that a company wouldn't have to cover legally separated spouses. In the forward-thinking states, until the divorce is final (and in some states even after the divorce if you get divorced under "bed and board") the health insurance has to stay in effect. You say your wife is scared of you. Do you mean she is saying she's scared of you or that she actually is? If you're saying she is legitimately scared of…
/r/MensRights17/05/12 12:22 AM
-1

Lol. That's beautiful coming from a men's rights clown, the angriest (and silliest) people on Reddit.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 12:11 AM
-3

Your silly little girl-haters club just makes up whatever rules they want, don't they? What you describe isn't the reality anywhere in the U.S. Either spouse maintaining the same lifestyle isn't the priority in any family court.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 12:00 AM
-5

She can get a temporary restraining order, which will get you out temporarily, but then she has to go to court and prove that you're a threat in order to get a permanent restraining order. That's in progressive states. The backwards states don't provide abused spouses with much protection at all. Which do you live in? EDIT: And she's responsible for the debt as well. Where did you get married, Mars?
/r/MensRights16/05/12 11:49 PM
-4

If your wife was making nothing they'd still attribute her at least $20,000 unless she had a condition that kept her from being able to work. If you're not divorced yet why is she covered under COBRA and not your health insurance? Seems like a waste of money to me since she still should be covered under yours. If you're still on the mortgage, that's not only "her housing" but is also covering your housing if you were still living there. Why did you move out? You didn't have to. Looks like you're…
/r/MensRights16/05/12 09:07 PM
-8

You are talking straight out of your ass. The family courts push everything towards mediation so that the judges don't have to decide the cases. The parties are given every opportunity and resource available to come to an agreement and as a result 95%-98% of cases aren't decided by judges, but by the parties coming to a settlement. A family court case going before a judge is a last resort and most people would rather have some control over the outcome which is another reason they come to a settl…
/r/MensRights16/05/12 08:41 PM
-9

If he's paying the mortgage on the house that he's going to get 50% of, then his spouse isn't really getting all that money, is she? Regardless, you're underlining the point which undermines OP's whining, which is that things aren't anywhere near as one-sided as he wants everyone to believe. Temporary support orders are based on maintaining the status quo until the divorce papers are signed. They're designed to keep the spouse who is making less money from getting screwed until the divorce is co…
/r/MensRights16/05/12 08:31 PM
-8

That's not what take home pay means. He's full of shit anyway. These types have to lie because the truth is the person making the most money in the marriage comes away much better off than their spouse. But they still feel the need to whine about it because they're narcissist irresponsible little children who play victim whenever they don't get their way.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 08:18 PM
-11

Lol. Sounds like your lawyer fucked you or you fucked yourself or you're lying (you're probably lying). If you're making six figures how the hell would you only end up with ten grand? Doesn't happen. The Court will assign your wife a yearly income that anyone could make, usually in the neighborhood of $20,000. The difference is $80,000 (if you're making $100,000). Divide 80 by 3 and you get $26,000 and change. Add that to your wife's attributed income and she has $46,000 and you have $73,000. In…
/r/MensRights16/05/12 07:51 PM
-13

Sure you do. By whining and crying about it.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 08:51 PM
-4

And that would make you the most ignorant person in this subreddit, which is quite the accomplishment.
/r/MensRights30/01/12 06:17 PM
-10

Obviously you are not here for intelligent discussion You are aware of what subreddit this is, aren't you? lol
/r/MensRights30/01/12 03:13 AM
-14

You guys are like a broken record with the "You're hiding behind sarcasm" bullshit. Bigots are only worthy of mockery so that's what you get. They don't even allow discussion there. Well, in r/MR they shadow-ban comments they don't agree with and then when they're called out on it they reinstate the comments and then brand the same accounts as trolls. All while crying about the feminist subreddits engage in the same behavior. Grow up. EDIT: And don't go crying for a source. I'm not your mother. …
/r/MensRights30/01/12 01:45 AM
-18

Of course they can. You're playing the victim right now.
/r/MensRights30/01/12 12:53 AM
-20

Your father's deeply ingrained hatred for women that he has instilled in you has successfully survived college! Rejoice!
/r/MensRights30/01/12 12:32 AM
-3

r/mensrights is this way, sir... oh shit! We're in r/mensrights!
/r/MensRights14/01/12 12:40 AM
-7

When are these fucking bitches gonna stop this shit?!! KILL ALL WOMEN!!!
/r/MensRights12/01/12 05:15 AM
0

Pro-tip: Sad jokes aren't going to help your non-existent love life.
/r/MensRights25/12/11 07:43 AM
1

Oh you poor thing.
/r/MensRights25/12/11 01:32 AM
-13

I'm sure you've been told this before but sucking your father's cock at such a young age really wasn't a great idea.
/r/MensRights24/12/11 06:30 AM
-19

Hey, it's Christmas Eve, you sad, bitter males. Can we give the whining a break for one night?
/r/MensRights24/12/11 06:17 AM
-2

Oh, all MRA's are straight white men That's quite the straw man you've got there.
/r/MensRights18/12/11 07:47 PM
-4

The ladies must love that wry wit of yours.
/r/MensRights17/12/11 11:39 PM
-2

Lol. That's the MR I know and love. I'm a guy btw. Except I get laid so I have a hard time relating to you "men".
/r/MensRights17/12/11 10:57 PM
-5

What a bunch of crybaby bitches.
/r/MensRights17/12/11 09:44 PM
-13

Nobody is forced to stay married or marry a woman if she gets pregnant. That's just silly propaganda which is why I think MR is a joke.
/r/MensRights17/12/11 04:55 PM
-14

Bigots hate opposing opinions more than anyone so the MR mods have been banning/shadow-banning/unbanning me for a while now. I guess that's their latest trick though I agree it's a lame one. Apparently trolls are people who don't hate women and blame them for all their problems.
/r/MensRights17/12/11 04:39 PM
-22

Yes, and there are racists who think that people who don't hate black people are bigoted towards whites. Funny world we live in.
/r/MensRights17/12/11 04:29 PM
-31

You forgot your choice to have unprotected sex. EDIT: Sorry, I forgot what subreddit this was. Carry on.
/r/MensRights17/12/11 02:21 PM
0

Oh good, I thought we weren't going to have anything to cry about today.
/r/MensRights15/12/11 02:41 AM
-21

Every rapist in prison was once in the general population, which kind of skews your statistics a bit. And since rapes in prison and in the general population are underreported, your analysis is hardly verifiable. I understand this is MR but try basing your propagandizing on the Fox News model. They're scum but at least they're good at it.
/r/MensRights13/11/11 07:03 PM
-2

Oh thank god. I thought I was gonna have to go all weekend without something to cry about.
/r/MensRights12/11/11 09:27 PM
0

Case in point.
/r/MensRights12/09/11 09:57 PM
-10

Newsflash: Not every woman is your mother.
/r/MensRights12/09/11 02:20 AM
-9

I said "right-wing morons" not "right-wingers who are morons". Apparently you presume that all right-wingers are morons, which makes your accusations of same wonderfully ironic. Thank you for the chuckle. Have an upvote.
/r/MensRights12/09/11 02:03 AM
-17

I think she was trolling the fuck out of Roderick.
/r/MensRights11/09/11 11:01 PM
-34

The fact there's an entire subreddit that doesn't get irony scares me. If there's ever a mass influx of right-wing morons onto Reddit it's because MR left the back door open.
/r/MensRights11/09/11 09:56 PM
-12

Are you saying that women aren't inherently more evil than men? That they're basically equal?! You lie, you cunt-lover, YOU LIE!!!
/r/MensRights31/08/11 04:04 PM
-7

Wait, they went to prison for it?! But now we have nothing to whine about!!!
/r/MensRights30/08/11 11:32 PM
-1

completely detached from reality You mean like believing women are evil oppressors and men are powerless victims? LOL The good news is things will never move backwards to satisfy people like you. Enjoy being angry about that for the rest of your life.
/r/MensRights30/08/11 03:45 AM
-1

And can abandon or adopt out the baby without the man's knowledge or consent. Yes, that's correct - anyone can break the law and that's what a woman would be doing if she adopted out the baby without the father's knowledge. What planet do you live on, if you don't mind me asking? Men lack the same rights as women. Seriously, what planet do you live on? If you don't want to be a father WEAR A FUCKING CONDOM, YOU IRRESPONSIBLE MORON. If you bring a child into the world you are financially responsi…
/r/MensRights29/08/11 09:15 PM
-1

I'm personally against abortion but I'm pro-choice because of the alternative. That and you're comparing apples and oranges. The man and women engaging in the act of copulation have a choice/choices to make before and during the act. After the deed is done and if she gets pregnant the woman has a new choice to make about her own body. If the man doesn't like the choice she makes then he should have thought about it previously when the choice was still his. tl;dr Don't have sex until you're able …
/r/MensRights29/08/11 05:33 PM
0

Sorry, dummy, I guess I didn't explain that clearly enough for you (MR does share its initials with mental retard and sometimes I forget that). You fuck with the condom on, but instead of blowing your goo in the condom, you pull out and cum somewhere else. That way if it breaks it won't matter because you're not inside the vagina when the your load breaks free. If that wasn't clear enough then you'll have to have your mom explain it because that's about as much as I can dumb it down.
/r/MensRights28/08/11 03:33 PM
0

Cum on her tits, on her ass, in her ass. The point is if you're not going to take the necessary precautions then you shouldn't whine about the possible consequences. And, yes, I am aware that asking you not to whine on r/mensrights is kind of silly.
/r/MensRights28/08/11 05:01 AM
-6

Women have a choice before pregnancy but men don't and men can only try to minimize the risk of a pregnancy. That statement in itself reeks of irresponsibility and hypocrisy. Men don't have a choice during the pregnancy. No shit, Shelock. It's not your body. Men don't have a choice after the pregnancy. After the pregnancy there's a child and if you fathered it, you're responsible for it, just as the mother is. Welcome to reality. tl;dr Wear a fucking condom and grow the fuck up.
/r/MensRights27/08/11 04:51 AM
-5

Yeah we do. Wear a condom, you irresponsible dumbass.
/r/MensRights27/08/11 01:58 AM
-4

On MR it can. We're all fucking retards here or haven't you heard?
/r/MensRights26/08/11 10:01 PM
-6

That doesn't diminish, in any way, the realities facing deadbeat dads. FTFY. I'm a man and if I knock up a girl and she decides to keep it, then I have a responsibility to that child. You mensrighters are a bunch of fucking losers.
/r/MensRights26/08/11 09:50 PM
-1

Maybe it has something to do with you being "sexually aroused" (aka walking around with a boner sticking out of your pants) while you're "just taking a peek". Women love being checked out so if they think you're a disgusting pervert it's probably because you are.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 09:34 PM
-3

Excuse me, sir, but this is r/mensrights. We don't care about unbelieveable facts as long as the article confirms are belief that women are no-good lying cunts.
/r/MensRights13/08/11 12:10 AM
-2

You're new here, aren't you?
/r/MensRights05/08/11 01:04 AM
-9

Slow day? Usually you guys have something slightly more substantial to whine about.
/r/MensRights05/08/11 12:25 AM
-7

Deadbeats Rejoice!
/r/MensRights04/08/11 03:52 AM
2

LOL! You came here for discussion?! Unless it's discussing why women are useless evil cunts, you're in for a rude awakening.
/r/MensRights01/08/11 08:18 PM
1

Sheesh, you guys sound like the feminazis you rail against. Why don't you all go out and have a beer and discuss the plethora of things you have in common rather than jerking yourselves off on your respective I Hate (blank) Groups?
/r/MensRights01/08/11 06:45 PM
1

Again, I love how hate groups project their prejudices onto anyone who calls them out for their misguided hatred. That's really all r/mensrights really is - a circle-jerk for intellectually-challenged men who blame women for their own poorly-made life choices. Unfortunately, since mental retard is an apt description of the members of this subreddit I will continue to use it.
/r/MensRights01/08/11 03:07 PM
1

Again, it depends on the context. In some contexts it's absolutely the equivalent and I'd tell anybody that.
/r/MensRights01/08/11 06:45 AM
-1

Bigory LOL! You guys think you're so brilliant because you're the only ones that see that women are evil and yet you can't even spell your defining characteristic. Keep it coming, MRs. It's a slow night at work and your antics are keeping me going.
/r/MensRights01/08/11 03:27 AM
-2

The irony of the word "bigot" being hurled by a misogynist amuses me to no end. Thanks for that.
/r/MensRights01/08/11 03:06 AM
-1

Yes. Also: concetrate. The correct spelling may come in handy some day.
/r/MensRights01/08/11 02:50 AM
0

It has something to do with trolling retards. Don't worry about it.
/r/MensRights01/08/11 02:30 AM
-1

Derp? Is that you?
/r/MensRights01/08/11 01:52 AM
-7

Speaking of which, have you ever noticed how Men's Rights and mental retard share the same initials?
/r/MensRights01/08/11 01:30 AM
-6

Well, that was the funniest one and stuck out like a sore thumb. Since you're struggling with your intellect so much I'll take the time to explain it to you... Like the word "bitch", "prick" and "dick" depend on the context. They could be a comment on an individual man/woman or used to demean an entire group. Dickhead is more of a high schooler's jerkwad but jerkwad was way more fun to single out and ridicule. And as for "boner"... well, it's been a long time since I've heard someone called a bo…
/r/MensRights01/08/11 01:17 AM
-5

Jerkwad? Are you saying that fourth graders hate men too? Even for a silly hate group like MR that's a pretty outlandish claim.
/r/MensRights31/07/11 09:11 PM
6

Yes, very good. It depends on the context. And "suck that bitches" refers to women as a group, hence the misogynistic label I applied to the comment.
/r/MensRights31/07/11 08:52 PM
-7

Yeah, like on r/whitesrights when I use the word "nigger" everybody assumes I'm a racist. It's bullshit, man.
/r/MensRights31/07/11 06:56 PM
-5

What an incredibly insightful top comment. I have no idea why anyone says Men's Rights is misogynistic.
/r/MensRights31/07/11 06:32 PM
0

Yeah, she says you have a thing about getting the last word in. Maybe it's all that desperate grasping for control that makes her seek quality sperm elsewhere.
/r/MensRights26/07/11 07:25 AM
-2

Fill her full of semen so she had more babies that you have to pay for? Done.
/r/MensRights26/07/11 07:12 AM
-2

Your wife. We're making you another baby.
/r/MensRights26/07/11 06:43 AM
-1

Ah, of course. The fake post to make women look awful. Try to stay consistent in your tone, Darryl, or even these Mental Retards might catch on.
/r/MensRights26/07/11 06:32 AM
-2

I think this falls under the category of if I have to explain it to you, then you're too dumb to understand it. But I'll try: You married someone who says cruel things to you in front of your children, one of which might not even be yours. That means you chose a mate poorly. That falls under poor life decisions. Read any of the threads under any of the MR articles. If those top comments don't strike you as misogynistic then you are a misogynist. People who whine always think their whining is rea…
/r/MensRights26/07/11 06:03 AM
-5

I get a kick out of people who make poor life choices then track down a hate group to whine to.
/r/MensRights25/07/11 11:47 PM
-6

Oh c'mon, you MR cunts know you love having things to whine about.
/r/MensRights22/07/11 09:21 PM
-1

It's no surprise that MR has no idea what constitutes sexual harassment. For something to qualify as sexual harassment it must first meet the requirement of being unwelcome behavior. This guy obviously didn't have a problem with it. In fact the banter they engaged in was probably practiced backstage. I guess men have it pretty good when all they have to complain about are things that are as innocuous as this.
/r/MensRights09/07/11 04:36 PM
-4

You talk like retard. This is good place for you.
/r/MensRights26/06/11 01:01 AM
-7

If you slap your four-year-old daughter hard enough to cut her lip then you are a certified piece of shit. Fortunately this piece of shit set himself on fire.
/r/MensRights25/06/11 11:28 PM
-1

Sounds like you had an ignorant individual (not woman, an individual) who discriminated against you. Since you experienced zero discrimination up to this point (even preferential treatment for being a male nurse by your own account) it appears that you're suffering from a bit of false outrage. Yes, it's wrong that it happened to you and you should consider filing a complaint about it because this type of thing should never happen, but imagine if you weren't a white male getting preferential trea…
/r/MensRights13/06/11 05:43 PM
0

:(
/r/MensRights09/06/11 11:37 PM
0

Ah, I get it. Another thing to blame on the women in your life.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 03:50 PM
-4

Ah, I get it. Another thing to blame on the women in your life.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 03:40 PM
-2

So the r/mensrights mods do the same thing that the r/feminism mods do and rather than acknowledge it, you want to get into a pissing contest. You poor sad hypocrite.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 03:29 PM
-2

I mentioned two things. I know you guys can't count very high but I'll try to explain: One of them was under a troll account, the other thing wasn't.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 03:19 PM
-4

I'm glad you had a miserable upbringing. You deserved it :)
/r/MensRights09/06/11 03:09 PM
-13

What you banned wasn't under one of my troll accounts and consisted of a reasonable debate. Apparently I made some points that didn't go with your agenda so you shadow-banned the comments you didn't like.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 06:10 AM
-2

What you banned wasn't under one of my troll accounts and consisted of a reasonable debate. Apparently I made some points that didn't go with your agenda so you shadow-banned the comments you didn't like.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 05:48 AM
-9

Good idea. You can start with this one.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 05:38 AM
-6

I was wondering you how jokers would spin this and now I know. What was banned wasn't under one of my troll accounts and consisted of a reasonable debate, not "obvious trolling". Apparently I made some points that didn't go with the MR agenda so the mods shadow-banned the comments they didn't agree with. But it doesn't surprise me that dissent amounts to trolling in your world.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 05:28 AM
0

Yes, they must have just unbanned it. That's why I included the original screencap.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 04:45 AM
0

It doesn't help that the MR mods shadow-ban comments that don't fall in line with their propaganda: Proof
/r/MensRights09/06/11 04:26 AM
-16

Kettle, meet pot. EDIT: Downvotes for providing evidence that misogynists are no better. You gotta love the MR gang.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 04:06 AM
-6

Kettle, meet pot.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 03:53 AM
-4

Proof
/r/MensRights09/06/11 03:37 AM
-6

Read the edit above, beeotch.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 03:27 AM
-7

Oh I'm not finished yet, motherfucker. Just wait a moment...
/r/MensRights09/06/11 03:00 AM
-3

Okay, let me fumble my way through here. I didn't realize what shadow-banning was at the time but here's the thread it happened in... All of those deleteds are me. Except they aren't deleted because I can see them from my own account. I'll link to a screenshot of what I can see. EDIT: PROOF Even better than this, under one of my troll accounts I got banned and when I asked the mod why he was banning me for expressing a dissenting opinion he said "Because you're a cunt." When I pointed out that I…
/r/MensRights09/06/11 02:44 AM
-6

Shadow-banning accounts/comments they don't agree with. This is common practice by the MR mods, which makes a post like this amusing and hypocritical.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 12:52 AM
-19

Kettle, meet pot.
/r/MensRights08/06/11 07:09 PM
-12

Please cross-post this to a real subreddit because this is actually important.
/r/MensRights05/06/11 03:44 AM
-2

Thank god. I thought we weren't going to have something to whine about this week.
/r/MensRights05/06/11 03:33 AM
1

Yes, I was specifically talking about the "groping" which is sexual assault and people who do it belong in jail. But in the land of the MRs that kind of thing is no big deal.
/r/MensRights25/05/11 11:08 PM
-1

Oh you poor disenfranchised white male :(
/r/MensRights25/05/11 09:36 AM
-12

Ooh, what fun! Glad I touched a nerve ;) EDIT: I just went through your lengthy, well-thought-out response. Two things: One, I truly am flattered that you've spent so much time on me this evening. I take it as high praise when I inspire an offended misogynist to expend this much energy on a rebuttal. Second, you are very welcome for giving you some practice for the stalking behavior that undoubtedly some lucky ladies in your vicinity are treated to. Third, I definitely need to be more consistent…
/r/MensRights25/05/11 01:15 AM
-15

To all the women that read these threads and are disgusted by the comments, rest assured that these men's rights scumbags are in the minority and most men respect women and see you as equals. On the bright side most of these "men" are professional losers with really small penises.
/r/MensRights25/05/11 12:17 AM
-20

It is a big deal and he belongs in jail for it and you're a fuckwit for saying otherwise. I guess part of the credit should go to the piece of shit who raised you and fed you this garbage about women (and obviously turned you into a failure with them as well). The good news is you deserve it.
/r/MensRights25/05/11 12:07 AM
-15

Let the pervert rot for ten days. Maybe he'll learn some manners. If my wife/daughter/sister got off a train and said there was a guy staring at her the entire trip, he'd get his fucking ass handed to him at the next stop. Not that I'm surprised MR would support a piece of shit like this.
/r/MensRights24/05/11 11:57 PM
2

MR better hope a false rape accusation story turns up soon because they're really scraping the bottom of the barrel with this one.
/r/MensRights24/05/11 05:41 AM
1

If a judge unilaterally decided that a girlfriend gets alimony for no good reason, then, no, it's not fair and it can be appealed and the money would be returned because there's no legal basis for it. But if you live in a state where they have common law marriage then you're an idiot for living with someone under the circumstances that would result in your relationship being considered a common law marriage. Know the fucking law, morons. And if you don't like the law, petition your state represe…
/r/MensRights21/05/11 11:49 PM
-9

I can sue you for wearing blue jeans on a Tuesday. It'll be thrown out of court but I can still sue you for it. Get out of the propaganda business, MR. You guys suck at it.
/r/MensRights21/05/11 05:27 AM
-10

It's unfair because MR is a bunch of whining little candyasses.
/r/MensRights12/05/11 11:57 PM
1

Thanks for the correction. I'm going to go ahead and edit it. "If you choose to spend money on your spouse, that's your call." Your argument works in relationships that aren't business arrangements and the law sees marriage as just that, a legally binding contract. Paying for your spouse's education is an investment in that business. If you disagree with that, then you shouldn't get married. Also, you may be surprised to hear that most men who don't want to pay alimony also don't want to pay for…
/r/MensRights21/04/11 12:27 AM
0

When you get married you are entering into a legal business contract, one in which the Courts assume both spouses are contributing 50% to the business. If you don't like that, then you need to sign a prenup that says otherwise because if you don't, then it defaults to what the law says this marital contract entails. In some states if one spouse can prove that the other one didn't contribute 50% to the marriage, then equitable distribution/alimony can be adjusted. Let's say you get married when y…
/r/MensRights20/04/11 04:04 PM
-9

To the piece of shit who made this comic, First off, fuckwit, women don't get alimony because they're women. In a long-term marriage in which there is a significant disparity in income, the spouse who makes less money is entitled to alimony. If they make a similar income or were married for a short period of time or if the one making more money was smart enough to sign a prenup, no one pays alimony. It has nothing to do with gender. Second, child support is for the children, not the spouse. Anyb…
/r/MensRights20/04/11 12:04 AM
-2

When misogynists/racists/homophobes throw out words like "bigot" it makes me feel all warm inside. Roland, I don't know if you were just some poor kid who had an awful human being for a mother or a sick evil cunt for a father (probably both actually) but somebody fucked you up good. Either way, now that you're an adult and you turned out the way you did, I'm glad it happened to you. You deserve every shitty thing that happened in your life that led you to your current state of hate-filled misery…
/r/MensRights17/04/11 02:01 AM
-15

You should consult a lawyer, not Men's Rights. MR is just a bunch of fucking retards who hate women.
/r/MensRights16/04/11 04:36 PM
-10

Male athletes are okay with it. Female athletes are not. Case closed.
/r/MensRights12/04/11 02:22 PM
1

Unfortunately, yes, North Carolina is in America. and if this article is any indication that state's laws are a joke... http://www.reddit.com/r/news/comments/gmyf7/nc_man_denied_pardon_after_17_years_of_wrongful/
/r/MensRights11/04/11 03:45 PM
0

Well, I was talking specifically about American laws regarding divorce. I have no idea how the laws work in your non-American country but how it works here is you aren't forced to work a $100,000 a year job to pay another person. The MR jokers like to pretend that's how it works but it doesn't.
/r/MensRights11/04/11 04:28 AM
0

They lived on the streets so they could pay alimony! Wow, you've quite the imagination. And as far as your slavery obsession, fortunately the courts disagree with you. Spouses, male or female, have certain rights and those rights don't amount to slavery as much as you want them to (I'm guessing you're a Teabagger with all that psychotic slavery nonsense - lol). If some idiot wants to think he's being forced into slavery by paying alimony at a rate appropriate to his income level, then fuck him. …
/r/MensRights11/04/11 01:56 AM
0

I'm not calling you names. I'm only calling the people who think a certain way those names. If you fall under that category, oh well. If someone starts making less money they can go into court under changed circumstances and prove that they legitimately got laid off, fired, can't find a comparable-paying job et cetera. If they are successful in making that argument then their alimony is lowered. So the way things should be is the way things already are. The law is way ahead of you. Now you know.…
/r/MensRights11/04/11 12:29 AM
0

Basic human rights! Let's say you get married when you're twenty-one because your girlfriend gets pregnant. You finish college and in the meantime you have another kid. Your wife becomes a stay at home mom, you work and continue through school and end up with an MBA. You get a job right out of school and over the next ten years work your way up through the company while your wife takes care of the kids, the housework et cetera. In the meantime your wife hasn't finished school, hasn't had a job, …
/r/MensRights10/04/11 10:15 PM
1

Excellent. Now let's all cry about it.
/r/MensRights10/04/11 10:25 AM
0

Don't get married then. You're obviously too stupid or too immature to enter that kind of contract, which is all marriage is - a business contract. If you don't like the way the law handles marriages when they end (and in my state the laws are incredibly fair and equitable - I don't know about yours), then don't sign the contract. You have no one to blame but yourself if you do. No one forces you into getting married as much as you MR twits love to play the victim.
/r/MensRights10/04/11 01:40 AM
-1

If someone who's actually interested wants me to post screencaps of what the comments look like depending on what account I'm signed in on I'd be happy to do that. If I waste my time showing you MR jokers proof you'll just react like Teabaggers being shown Obama's original birth certificate.
/r/MensRights09/04/11 11:47 PM
0

You obviously don't know very much about marriage contracts. If you actually sign a prenup, which most people aren't smart enough to do, then maybe you're correct. But if you don't sign one then you're bound by the laws of your state. Sorry, but you don't get to decide how things are going to be because you're mad at your wife. There are laws dictating how divorces happen and how assets are divided and if you defy the Court you go to jail. However you are right that the wife cannot force the hus…
/r/MensRights09/04/11 11:37 PM
-2

I don't know what goes on in those many "fem-subreddits" because I don't visit them but I can tell you for a fact it already goes on here.
/r/MensRights09/04/11 03:58 PM
-2

Well, this sounds like an epic troll but it's hard to tell in the land of the MRs. Thanks for sharing.
/r/MensRights09/04/11 03:45 PM
-1

A little light research on family law will do you wonders. The law effectively sees a marriage as a legal partnership. When the marriage ends the one party making the money continues to benefit from the fact that the other party took care of the other responsibilities in the marriage (one spouse typically sacrifices furthering their education/career to take on the child-rearing responsibilities) and therefore should continue to maintain the lifestyle they had during the marriage. The law assumes…
/r/MensRights09/04/11 03:34 PM
-6

I know over here in MR this is an absurd concept because you think women are greedy cunts but in a twenty year marriage half of that money is rightfully hers. How this works in the U.S. is he would still owe her all that money despite giving it away. Likewise, if you quit your $100,000 a year job and start working at Burger King you're still going to pay your wife alimony at the previous level. So if Australia's laws are anything like ours what'll end up happening the Court will say he had every…
/r/MensRights09/04/11 02:26 PM
-1

The one who was debating Seabass341? That wasn't me. Everything I posted in our little sub-thread is still here. The comments are buried of course but they're there.
/r/MensRights26/03/11 04:04 PM
-2

edit: huh TicTokCroc was either banned or deleted their posts. What were you trying to say here? I haven't deleted anything.
/r/MensRights26/03/11 03:54 PM
0

Okay, you were apparently not going for irony or aware of the irony of your statement. I don't know how to explain it any clearer than I did but I'll try. "Only a feminist could describe... " reveals a very clear prejudice against women. It's like saying "Only a black person would see a white pride organization as racist." That comment, which suggests that only a specific subsection of people (blacks) would see something that's obviously good as bad, is inherently racist. Another would be "Only …
/r/MensRights26/03/11 03:16 PM
0

Only a misogynist/racist/homophobe would describe their hate group as an egalitarian movement that wants equal rights and responsibilities and anyone who disagrees must be a cunt/nigger/faggot. FTFY. Seriously, "Only a feminist"? Are you going for epic irony or are you just that ignorant of your own misogyny?
/r/MensRights26/03/11 02:30 PM
-19

"Astro turfing and attempting to discredit a movement through planted agitators is not a new phenomenal." Very true. Every hate group's had to deal with this. You guys are young and I'm sure you'll work it out. I really wouldn't worry about it.
/r/MensRights26/03/11 02:09 PM
1

Weed out the misogynists?! LOL! They do that and this place'll end up looking like r/nihilism
/r/MensRights18/03/11 05:50 PM
-7

Apparently not. Did you get your father's cock out of yours?
/r/MensRights18/03/11 05:35 PM
-17

Men's Rights? Downvoted.
/r/MensRights14/03/11 08:07 PM
0

Yes, well, those situations are tough to argue with. No doubt women are given the benefit of the doubt in domestic violence situations... except when they weren't. The laws (in some states) now make sure that an attempt is made to correctly identify the guilty party and protect the victim regardless of gender. Rewind back to the eighties and you had an entirely different story. Keep in mind that most of the cops that showed up at the door were male and the truly vile of the male abusers were abl…
/r/MensRights12/03/11 05:25 PM
-2

Enjoy never getting laid!! :(
/r/MensRights12/03/11 05:15 PM
0

Ah, but do you muster every ounce of hate you can for the men that are just as abusive? And in most states child support is calculated after the alimony has been accounted for. New Jersey's laws are very fair on all of this, which means other states can have the same laws if people push to make it happen.
/r/MensRights12/03/11 04:59 PM
-13

Ooh, rage issues too. No wonder you have so many problems with women. You should really see someone about that. But for a moment let's assume that you are not a misogynist. Are you aware that you posted the story to Men's Rights? As you can see from the vast majority of the comments here this is a subreddit for men who hate women. Just take a quick glance and you'll find a generous sprinkling of words like "whore" and "cunt" so all you've really done is thrown those scumbags a nice big bone to g…
/r/MensRights12/03/11 04:42 AM
-14

Oh no, not an attention-seeking dolt, just someone who hates women and spreads bullshit stories to push your anti-female agenda. If this story is true then in your particular state the laws are wrong and must be changed. In most states (including mine) if Probation takes too much money out of your paycheck for child support, you get that credited back to you. That's a fact. If it's not a fact in your state you may want to try going after the people that make such laws and not women.
/r/MensRights12/03/11 04:23 AM
-8

You should blame the laws, not the women (who you obviously hate). My state laws don't work like that. What fucked up state are you from?
/r/MensRights12/03/11 04:13 AM
-18

Obviously made-up nonsense. If you overpay child support, it gets returned to you. But as a Men's Rights submission it gets an automatic downvote anyway.
/r/MensRights12/03/11 12:48 AM
2

Is that what your mother used to call you before she jacked you off and spanked your heiney?
/r/MensRights08/03/11 05:23 AM
1

Very nice. I like seeing the MR mods' true colors come out. Actually I have a very nice set of man tits. And I bet you have got a nice set of floppy jalopies to go with the small penis situation. No wonder you hate women so much. They probably vomit when they smell you coming.
/r/MensRights08/03/11 04:57 AM
2

Oh hey, tomek77. I enjoyed our private chat earlier. How's the tiny penis been treating you?
/r/MensRights08/03/11 03:48 AM
-7

Yeah, and feminazis make the same argument about the word "bitch". Remember that scene in Unforgiven where the whore laughed at the big cowboy's small penis and got her faced cut for it? That's pretty much what Men's Rights is made of. A bunch of women-hating losers who should be eternally grateful that pornography doesn't care how small your penis is. EDIT: "you have been banned from posting to Male Studies." Male studies, lol. That's like changing the name of white's rights to caucasian querie…
/r/MensRights06/03/11 11:46 PM
-2

And you are the perpetrator of the vast majority of blowjobs your father gets.
/r/MensRights20/02/11 05:49 AM
-6

Men's Rights is the perpetrator of the vast majority of hate speech on Reddit.
/r/MensRights20/02/11 02:42 AM
-1

Submission to Men's Rights = Automatic down-vote.
/r/MensRights14/02/11 09:40 PM
-1

A high school kid with a way bigger penis than you. And one who loves women because they'll actually sleep with me. Black ones too.
/r/MensRights13/02/11 04:11 AM
-7

Pointing out that you have a small penis and are very angry about it isn't sexism. It's just amusing and accurate. Glad to see I touched a nerve though.
/r/MensRights13/02/11 03:00 AM
-1

Well, whatever they did they obviously fucked up real bad.
/r/MensRights13/02/11 02:46 AM
-6

Oh, you poor, disenfranchised white male. How original. Being raised by racist, sexist fuckwits isn't an excuse for being this dumb. And it's not a woman's fault that she doesn't have a use for small penis so stop taking it out on them.
/r/MensRights13/02/11 02:36 AM
-2

Sure, I'll elaborate. You should go back to sucking your father's cock. You aren't quite saturated with his ignorance yet.
/r/MensRights13/02/11 02:24 AM
0

When you say "certain people" you really mean blacks and women. You've already made your racist/sexist leanings perfectly clear so there's no need to play coy. So you're saying the police go lighter on black people? Obviously people with your perspective are incredibly ignorant and ill-informed, but you're deep into retard territory if you actually believe that.
/r/MensRights13/02/11 02:14 AM
0

Yes, she's a bad person. Don't worry, you're not alone. Racists struggle with this concept as well.
/r/MensRights13/02/11 01:31 AM
-4

Because he's a sexist piece of shit and probably knows all the cool hate-filled sub-reddits. Duh.
/r/MensRights13/02/11 01:20 AM
-6

Hey, I bet you know the answer to this one... Do you know if there's also a subreddit for racist pieces of shit?
/r/MensRights13/02/11 01:12 AM
13

Congratulations. You're not a retard.
/r/MensRights13/02/11 01:01 AM
0

What's that? A black person caught doing something bad is "really the victim here"? Shocking.
/r/MensRights13/02/11 12:51 AM
-3

Anytime I read these posts I can't help but think either the OP is lying to promote Men's Rights propaganda or did something really creepy and is trying to overcompensate by playing the victim. And if it did really happen, did you say hi to the kids the way you do with pretty girls - all sweaty and nervous, drooling like a mongoloid? Those pretty girls grow up to be moms and if they thought you were creepy before, they're really not going to like it when you act that way with their kids. Try not…
/r/MensRights06/02/11 11:20 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter