TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TidalPotential Archive

View 2 posts and 49 comments by TidalPotential on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

TidalPotential/r/MensRights19/02/12 07:23 PM
1

TidalPotential/r/MensRights13/02/12 02:46 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Amazon Mom rhymes with Amazon (dot) Com. That's it. That's all.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 10:35 PM
1

Last numbers I had seen were 48% male, 52% female, but it's close enough to be hard to say - I think he was referring to the Y chromosone being abnormal? I dunno.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 09:26 PM
1

I keep a firearm within a reasonable distance of myself virtually all the time I'm at home. It means that I am not defenseless if anyone breaks into my home and attempts to harm me or those in my household. It is reasonable for well-balance, trained people to carry guns at all times to protect themselves and those around them from any crime or harm.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 03:34 AM
1

Really? If you're going to go into someone's living space, and you know they have a gun and know how to use it, wouldn't you probably decide against it? Even if you have a way to disarm them, what's to say it'll work for sure?
/r/MensRights10/03/13 02:57 AM
26

No one should have to posess or use a firearm in self defense. No one should be the victim of a crime, and no one should have to die in war, and no one should ever starve. Be real. Defensive gun uses prevent millions of crimes a year in the U.S. alone, with relatively few deaths even of criminals. There are between 1.8 and 2.5 million uses per year of a firearm to prevent crime. Guess how many people die because of firearms? Including gang-related shootings and those who die because someone shot…
/r/MensRights06/03/13 03:23 PM
5

All 138 who voted against it are Republicans.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 08:52 PM
1

The semi-auto is his primary CCW. It's "Oh, shit - mugger." The revolver is a backup - less capacity, but much more reliable, in case semi-auto fucks up. Rounds are because it really can't hurt to have the ability to shoot more often if you're in a truly bad situation. It'll suck more to not have them than to have them. Onle one of the knives is combat, and while I'm inclined to think even that's overkill... well, it can't hurt to be prepared, as long as it doesn't cripple you getting there.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 07:19 PM
1

If they start lunging before you draw, probably not - though good CCW classes will teach you how to deal with that - but if you can start to draw without them realizing it? You'll be fine.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 07:17 PM
6

I wish my hair was that glorious.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 07:15 PM
7

It's a bit more like X is the autosave and Y is the random pressing of keys. Y doesn't always amount to genetic change, or positive genetic change, but it does a lot more often than X.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 07:30 AM
2

Open up the erratta, see who reblogged it with extra comments.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 12:48 PM
7

This is where I have to disagree. Men are stronger, faster, and tougher than women across the board post-puberty. Any move to eliminate gender lines in sports would stifle all women playing sports competitively - which is not good. The solution is to have more teams for both genders where there is interest.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 03:53 AM
8

As a gender, yes. Men may hold many high positions for different reasons (ambition, incumbency, etc.) but they don't advance laws or practices that address problems men face (primarily disparity in prosecution and civil litigation - social issues require bottom-up movement as opposed to top-down movement.) Women's poltiical groups often press a feminist view - liberal feminism (the sort that should properly be called egalitarian ism) or radical feminism (the sort that believes that women are bet…
/r/MensRights02/09/12 03:11 AM
1

"ten in the last several decades" Is that really worth a blatantly misandric policy? For ten out of millions of children flying?
/r/MensRights14/08/12 05:52 PM
2

Nope. If I don't find her attractive, I won't hit on her. She's a stalker if she's a stalker, regardless of how attractive she is.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 05:16 PM
32

Can I get a source on the in-flight sexual harassment case? I couldn't find it (or any other) on my own. Not to disagree with you - I just want it to throw in /r/politic's face.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 02:53 PM
2

Which is why we should strive for Egalitarianism. Equality-ism.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 07:08 AM
2

If the male wants a paternal surrender, and the woman wants an abortion, it is reasonable to force the male to pay for half. If the male does not want a paternal surrender, he should be, under no circumstances, forced to help pay for an abortion, and if she chooses to have an adoption, he should have first call - assuming he is legally fit (no serious legal issues), mentally stable, and financially capable (like any other adoptor) then he should recieve the child first. Also, all of this should …
/r/MensRights16/07/12 10:46 PM
1

The thing is? If the man is rich (and sometimes if not) child support is enough for the woman and the child to live off of. Sure, you have to raise a kid (which you'll probably do a shitty job of) but you don't have to get a job - hell, you don't even have to pretend to be looking for one unless you also want unemployment.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 10:42 PM
3

Really? Where do I get this male contraceptive pill? Oh, wait. It's not available. And even when it is, there will still be an imbalance (though one I would accept, assuming the male pill is reasonably priced and has a truly 0% failure rate)
/r/MensRights16/07/12 10:40 PM
2

If this isn't a troll, I'm going to bankrupt myself attempting to enter orbit to get the fuck away from all the crazy. Probably a troll.
/r/MensRights15/07/12 03:54 AM
0

Clitoris, mate. Clitoris. More nerve endings on a tiny button than the entire penis.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 12:27 AM
-1

Women experience nearly as much pain from a strike to their crotch, though it doesn't ripple to their stomach. It just isn't nearly as common.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 08:13 PM
2

This is okay except for the fact that it's easy as fuck to make a mistake as a teen and become a sex offender.
/r/MensRights24/06/12 08:11 PM
11

I think the problem is that Dave was a jerk, not that Dave was a man.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 02:11 AM
2

Yes. But the burning support beam they have to lift off of an elderly man's chest isn't going to be lighter or heavier because of the gender of the firefighter who gets their first. Whereas statistically speaking, a woman is less likely to get in a serious crash. They cost thei nsurance company less money. It makes sense to charge them less (and men more.)
/r/MensRights27/05/12 05:20 AM
2

Insurance premiums follow acturials. Physical workloads are something that don't magically decrease because you're a woman. Or increase because you're male.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 10:43 PM
3

It's not inconsistent - it is different on many levels. Inconsistency would be his being okay with men and women having different admittance requirements in one occupation, but not in another.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 07:48 PM
1

I believe it would be. And if they were stronger, it would be okay to still hold them to the same standards for applications to fire departments, for example.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 05:45 PM
8

What part of it doesn't make sense? He's fine with having to pay more, as statistically men end up costing the insurance companies more, as long as women (who undeniably have a lower median strength/endurance level) are held to the same standards as men for job applications, etc. He is against affirmative action (as am I)
/r/MensRights26/05/12 05:43 PM
3

The current birth controls available in the states are.. Condoms, which break and are prone, in the case of crazy, to purposeful sabotage, by sperm-theft of purposeful puncturing. Getting snipped, which is a permanent surgical procedure, which women cannot prove before sex, though a cursory examination of semen afterwards will prove it. Those two are available to men, with the condom being joint. These are only available to women. The Pill, which is often taken anyways for side benefits, but whi…
/r/MensRights17/05/12 10:01 PM
5

Okay. Don't stick your dick in crazy. If everyone's crazy, we can't have sex with anyone. Women don't get a lifetime financial commitment if they fuck someone who's crazy. Men do.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 06:19 PM
13

It's not consequence free, but there is no male equivalent. Once she is pregnant, it is entirely her decision what happens, including a lifelong financial commitment with the threat of debtor's prison if you can't meet often outrageous payments. In many states, you can't even absolve your name with a paternity test, meaning it can happen even with someone else's child. That is the problem that MRAs have. That men can be held responsible for something they have no control over with lifelong respo…
/r/MensRights17/05/12 04:43 PM
7

Except women can, if they choose, have a man put their D in their vagina, and not face consequences if they don't want to.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 04:09 PM
1

I don't understand how the second part is good. The first part is excellent, the second part not so much.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 04:07 PM
4

Not really. In fact, not at all.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 07:06 PM
1

You can't say "Well, hire more women" and magically expect it to happen.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 04:59 AM
5

sex advice from cosmos Actually, that's quite , ah, "fun." if you're both into your respective roles. But they also don't mention things like safewords. If you're doing any sort of intentional pinning in sex, have a god-damned safe word.
/r/MensRights21/04/12 06:54 AM
4

That'd be fine if DV courts weren't sexist in most/all cases.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 05:01 PM
2

This should, be truly gender neutral. "A nonparent is absolved of all parental rights and responsibilities if they are proven via genetic testing to not be the parent of a given child" and maybe something about sperm/egg donors, so they can't get screwed. Overall I totally approve though.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 04:15 AM
4

Crossposting to WTF in an hour or so assuming no protest.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 11:23 PM
1

Only making it gender neutral (with options for either sex to opt for non-violent means, as in Switzerland, perhaps at a time-penalty, like in Switzerland)
/r/MensRights11/03/12 01:35 AM
1

It's sexism when it negatively affects women and a non-factor when it doesn't. That's the number one reason I started reading about MR. Seriously... sexism is sexism - it cuts both ways.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 02:26 AM
1

I wasn't thinking of western culture. I was thinking in actually male-dominated cultures, Saudi Arabia springing to mind.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 09:58 PM
1

I think this has to be satirical. There's no way someone could say all of that literally.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 07:43 PM
1

... even if you do all that, in many states, you can STILL get fucked by the law. It doesn't matter if they perjure, or if you have no fucking clue, or if they look like a crone and there is no reasonable expectation that they are under the AOC.. they can STILL screw you over if they are.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 02:23 AM
1

Slender, skinny, yes, men like... not all, but many, myself included. But size 0, ribs showing? Ugh. I can think of no man I know who wants any woman unhealthily skinny.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 06:53 PM
1

SLT is why I'm going to sign a pre-nup with whoever I marry. If they can't handle signing a pre-nup then I won't marry them - no amount of love is worth the potential of having it broken along with my livelihood.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 06:41 PM
0

I got here from a link in a thread in AskReddit about then.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 06:14 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter