~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| -1 | Came here from the jubilee episodeYou had a larger conversation where you said one really dumb thing. A rational person would correct their stance instead of doubling down on an insane view. | /r/ExRedPill | 20/07/26 04:51 PM |
| -4 | Came here from the jubilee episodeVirtually any woman on the apps can get engagement. Half of all men get approximately zero engagement. You can’t do anything with that. Women can weed out the shitty men. That you are sincerely arguing this is a close call is absurd. Just because it’s incomparably easier for women doesn’t mean there aren’t challenges. Those challenges are just able to be overcome. For many men, that’s not the case. Real life interactions are far more balanced. When there is a cost of approaching someone, it is l… | /r/ExRedPill | 20/07/26 04:48 PM |
| -4 | Came here from the jubilee episodeI mentioned I’m glad I’m of the era who dated prior to apps because they just seem completely toxic. He then said it’s easy though for women, they get plenty of interest. You were talking about the apps. The apps are undeniably easier for women. Suggesting otherwise is crazy. | /r/ExRedPill | 20/07/26 04:29 PM |
| -1 | Came here from the jubilee episodeThe young man’s claim that only the top tier of men ("8-10s") get consistent interest on apps is not an invention of the "manosphere"—it is a direct reflection of platform mechanics, gender ratios, and user behavior. Severe Gender Imbalance: On major swipe apps like Tinder and Bumble, the user base in Western countries skews roughly 65% to 75% male and 25% to 35% female . This creates a massive structural supply/demand imbalance from the start. Swiping Asymmetry: Multiple behavioral studies (and… | /r/ExRedPill | 20/07/26 03:49 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter