TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Tikkan Archive

View 1 posts and 123 comments by Tikkan on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
35

DiscussionTikkan/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/19 08:02 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

It's like someone hitting someone in the face, him getting mad, and then all the onlookers who only saw him getting mad blame everything on him. Uhh, not a very good comparison. People are always entitled (by law) to not being randomly physically assaulted lmao. There is, however, never a scenario where someone is actually entitled to a romantic relationship or sex. I've never heard any woman say to a man that he "deserves" to have sex with women, either. They may act optimistic for him ("You sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/19 08:19 PM
1

Only time I'd say either of these could be called "entitled', is when they act indignant toward the rejecting party. If you think women, (or men), are treating you "unfairly", (in other words, not giving you what you "deserve"), yes, you are entitled.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/19 05:18 PM
1

Obvious neurotic incel that will kill himself before age 35.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/19 01:30 AM
1

He doesn't seem to notice if you're being sarcastic or real He takes everything seriously So, he's seemingly autistic and has no sense of humor? Not attractive. Everything else is fine unless the "eager to please" point bled into "unassertive and submissive"
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/19 11:21 PM
1

Derail already happened. Attempts to shame while masquerading as sympathy. Now go police somewhere else pig. She isn't masquerading with sympathy. Calling people pathetic or sad has never been used as a real empathetic measure. You're being deliberately obtuse in ignoring the main point of the comment (objecting to the annoying broad brushing politics) and hyper focusing on a little insult to derail everything. Now go somewhere else, projecting manlet
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/19 11:09 PM
1

Get governments to fund campaigns chastising women for making men make the first move. I find it difficult to believe you've even graduated high school, much less college, but nonetheless, this is delusional. The government is not going to fund something as ridiculous as this. Your social life is no business of the state's. Men are horny, much moreso than women, thus will take it upon themselves to initiate conversation the vast majority of the time. Women also like confident men. A man that is …
/r/MensRights06/07/19 11:00 PM
1

See tons of Europeans/Canadians claim to be incels, but who knows. There hasn't been international study on this to my knowledge.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/19 10:28 PM
1

It's not widespread anywhere. There's a huge overlap between incel and mgtow communities. How many actually walked away from relationships and how many are just ugly manlets who are undesired by women? Who knows.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/19 09:52 PM
1

You don’t care yet you still reply to deliver your viewpoint lol. What? She said she didn't care if he remains celibate. It's clearly broad brushing politics that she's responding to. Are you being deliberately obtuse and derailing?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/19 09:49 PM
1

You (should) have the right to want love, sex, companionship, affection. You (should) have the right to want all those things and not be demonised for it. The way feminists attack 'incels'? They aren't. "Incels" only get the sheer amount of vitriol thrown at them because they typically demonize and throw vitriol at women first. They then try to backpedal and avoid any responsibility by insinuating that people only hate them because they're not sexually successful enough.
/r/MensRights06/07/19 02:34 PM
1

I think men mostly refrain from showing fear and sometimes sadness in public? All the others: disapproval, love, optimism, aggressiveness, pensiveness, annoyance, anger, rage, joy, serenity, admiration, trust, acceptance, vigilance, anticipation, interest, boredom, disgust, distraction, surprise, amazement, I see men express quite openly.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 09:00 PM
1

Bad bot
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 08:28 PM
1

I'm a woman, so I'll answer here. Have you ever seen a woman hit at home or in your friends/family? Did she "deserve" it and why? Yeah, my father kicked my mother down the hallway (and into a wall) after he picked up my six year old brother and dropped him on the floor (he was eating his vegetables too slowly), I think I was around four at the time. My father had heart disease and acted like a subhuman animal up until he finally had his heart attack. My mother was also slapped by her alcoholic o…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 07:06 PM
1

Yes, everything is woman's fault, even crime committed by men. Keep hamstering.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/19 10:20 PM
1

A lack of self-awareness and accountability, most likely. Nobody's the ideal person.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/19 12:10 AM
1

Here is the definition: - a system of society or government in which the father or eldest male is head of the family and descent is traced through the male line. or - a system of society or government in which men hold the power and women are largely excluded from it. Yes, it refers to governmental or societal structures. This: A patriarchy DOES do that: if you contribute to society according to what that society values, then you are rewarded. Is not stated or implied in the definition. An oppre…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 07:07 PM
1

A monarchy in which only one man is rewarded the "ultimate reward" can still be a "patriarchy" if the throne is only awarded through the paternal family line. Again, the term's definition does not cover what you're trying to make it cover. North Korea could be called a "patriarchy" since only a handful of men are in charge, despite 99.9999% of the other men living in a severely oppressive state. I simply used the term "capitalist" because it roughly describes the "reap what you sow" system of re…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 05:52 PM
1

Again, you're missing the point. Even in a "matriarchy", men could theoretically compete for higher social status, more resources, etc. The capitalistic mindset wherein men reap what they sow within a society is not inherent to the definition of "patriarchy"
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 03:35 PM
1

Have you never heard of "cat ladies", dude? Way more widespread than "herbivore men"
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 02:22 AM
1

But what you said was fundamentally irrelevant to "patriarchy"
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 02:17 AM
1

Patriarchy is a system that issues rewards to men in exchange for offering value to society at large. That isn't a very accurate definition of "patriarchy". The term simply seems men hold all authoritative power in a society and women hold close to none. The society could still organize itself socially and economically in a variety of different ways. A tribe that has a polygamous harem culture wherein most of the men at the bottom of the totem pole are completely left out of the reproduction gam…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/19 09:44 PM
1

first of all, when did i say anything about 45+ year olds with 20 somethings? Are you lost? My initial comment said "old dudes". You replied to me. second, are you checking the IDs of every random couple you see to verify their age? The amount of people that look like they're in their thirties when they're actually 45+ is low. Sure, there might be some dude that ages like a god and looks 25 when he's 55. This is an outlier. I already made an exception for the unusually good looking my first comm…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/19 10:54 PM
1

How many twenty-somethings do you see with fifty year old men? Very few, and they're almost always wealthy.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/19 05:18 PM
1

White = no/low melanin and collagen, which is what keeps you looking youthful. Whites have a normal amount of collagen during youth, but there's a certain gene that contributes to a more rapid decline of skin elasticity. Not all whites have it (some age quite well), but many do. This is unrelated to melanin. East Asians have pale skin and probably age better than most hispanics or blacks.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/19 03:02 PM
1

Most men don't like fat women unless they have an extremely curvy figure. Back to the original point, I still think women spend way more money on making themselves attractive in comparison to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/19 01:45 AM
1

What? Testosterone promotes muscle gain and fat loss. Through exercise, men get way bigger results than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/19 01:31 AM
1

we have to work a whole lot harder on our appearance than women do. How so? Women put a ton of effort and money into their make-up, hair, clothing, skincare, and exercise. It's also harder for women to drop fat.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/19 12:55 AM
1

What needs to be clarified is that while the average man has more access to sex as they get older, it's generally from women in their age group. The same women that RPers say have already "hit the wall". Many are single mothers or have been divorced. Vast, vast majority of the time, young attractive women date young attractive men. The old dudes that DO pull young women are either hot or rich. Basically the same dudes who could also pull hot women when they were young lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/19 12:33 AM
1

That's called the media being ridiculous and misandry running rampant.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/19 03:38 PM
1

I know, but it's not as radical of a difference as you're implying. You have the gender ratio stat for ages 18-25? That's the most important one here anyway. Doesn't matter if there are a ton of grannies in Hong Kong.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/19 04:46 AM
1

What? https://www.chinadailyhk.com/articles/211/15/206/1532687567608.html Women only make up 54% of Hong Kong. The biggest gender disparity is in ages 35-39. The article also deliberately avoids the talking about the younger demographic's ratios.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/19 04:34 AM
1

China literally participated in the mass extermination of female infants, but you're seething over the supposed "privilege" that the few women that didn't flushed down a toilet have? Bitch, you're mentally ill
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/19 03:50 AM
1

The only possible end goal for feminism is the destruction of men. Or mechanically enhanced bodies that put everyone on the same level physically.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/19 02:27 AM
1

I'm convinced these articles from China are deliberate false flags. Men out number women to an astounding degree in China, and there a serious problem wherein Chinese men abduct women from neighboring countries and force them to be their brides. The article you posted makes no use of statistics and spins a narrative out of thin fucking air.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/19 02:08 AM
1

It pretty much has. The only thing of significance feminists fight for these days are abortion rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/19 01:52 AM
1

Fundamentally, feminism is the pursuit of legal rights, not the pursuit of gender eradication in social or sexual contexts.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/19 01:49 AM
1

Not a good proposal. Anyone in a genuinely shitty situation will be completely fucked. Found out your husband is a pedo that discretely fondles kids on the usual? Guess you have to give the house, the car, and the bank accounts over to him. If you were a stay at home mother you're extra fucked.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/19 01:21 AM
1

lmao you're the female version of a cuck
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/19 01:02 AM
1

Most women are not nearly as promiscuous as the people around here claim
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/19 11:58 PM
1

Any self-made wealthy woman could.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/19 06:07 PM
1

Wealthy people can disregard and circumvent social hierarchies. If Oprah adopted a kid today, I don't think any of the bitches that grovel at her feet for money would give a shit. Once you're successful enough, you have automatic top dog status.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/19 03:00 PM
1

Only if it's a baby daddy situation. A wealthy woman going out of her way to get artificially inseminated and raising the child alone isn't quite the same thing. It's extremely rare, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/19 02:49 PM
1

Female, got true neutral.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 03:59 PM
1

What point? Here's you in a nutshell: "I demand you to invalidate this man's opinion on what makes a beautiful woman. As if opinions can be objectively correct or incorrect" As for the rest, the dude is just parroting anti-feminist politics. It's unoriginal, thus irrelevant. The main point is that his delivery is stupid. He doesn't want to "give advice to women", he just wants to "trigger the leftists lelel@#@$" Again, what woman would bother reading this dude's material after seeing the edgy du…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 07:08 AM
1

If you out yourself as an attention whoring troll, people do not take your position seriously. This is the point. It hurts your own image and the "politics" that you subscribe to. Stupid long term strategy. ​ ​
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 06:29 AM
1

If that's his policy then that's him. Doesn't make the point stupid That tweet falls into the nearly brain dead category. Immediately destroyed his credibility with impulsive juvenile trolling. What woman would want to follow the advice of some dude that acts like an attention-seeking brat? If anything, it makes women want to be unfeminine to avoid interacting with cretins like this. Not sure how old you are but hes appealing to a younger audience with his tweets. No evidence of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 03:02 AM
1

"I have a personal policy that I only talk to women who are 8+s on a 10 scale, so if I ignore your reply, don’t feel bad" "If you’re angry, it might be because your excess bodyfat is causing hormonal fluctuations that make you emotional" "Pay attention to all the women that react adversely to this thread Gentlemen What you'll observe here is the peak of Delusional feminism, women who believe that simply because they exist, they are "valuable" despite being bitchy & horrifying" Typical teenager-e…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/19 08:50 PM
1

This is the only one I'd really disagree with. I think women do this more than men. Women are more collectivist and men are more individualistic generally speaking. No, women typically put their own needs before the group. It's why female gangs don't exist. Even in all-female prisons where it would theoretically be easier to form a gang. Their in-groups are more akin to "cliques" than anything else. Broken just as easily as they're formed. Women snitch on each other all the time. Contrast that t…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/19 05:04 PM
1

You posted a link of a woman who went through pregnancy without any permanent damage to the skin and told OP to GTFO. OP's question was whether if you would pay for a woman's mommy makeover due to permanent damage from pregnancy. BirdBrainBrrrr pls gtfo
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/19 12:30 AM
1

Lmao what. Not all women have equally elastic skin/ same genetics. How can you not know this? With some women, massive stretch marks, saggy boobs, or loose skin are inevitable after pregnancy. Do you also think people that age poorly (drooping faces, deep set wrinkles, receding hairlines, etc.) are always just lazier than the people who look somewhat better at old age? looool
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/19 12:16 AM
3

What is really bizarre is this insane push to get women into STEM roles even though they aren't suited for those roles. There might be on average less women suited to STEM careers, but it's odd to say they're not suited because of their gender. A man wouldn't be a better mathematician simply by merit of being male (unlike physically demanding jobs where maleness is an automatic advantage). He needs a high level of intelligence first and foremost, which most men do not have.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/19 12:00 AM
1

It specifically means you're a man who is unknowingly raising another man's child.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/19 04:22 AM
–

Don't agree with this. You're acting as if adult men are children. The men choose to cheat. It's obviously not the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 01:26 AM
1

it's low inhibition + volatile/extreme emotionality "Crazy" chick that wants to get married after one week of dating = low inhib + possible borderline personality/other attachment disorder "Crazy" chick that pours bleach on your clothes and keys your car after break up= low inhib + narcissism/sociopathy "Crazy" chick that loves you one minute and screeches at you the next = low inhib + mood disorder
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/19 09:07 PM
1

Asking a genuine question. Why do you think both of these are simultaneously true?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/19 06:45 PM
1

Why do you think that more woman in a relationship means more divorce? Why do you think that more man in a relationship means more murder?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/19 06:18 PM
1

Right exactly so she's getting men less attractive than she used to, you're not disproving shit. Again, no one is attractive at 60-70. She got the top 20% of men in 20-30 age group when she was 20-30, and she's still getting the top 20% of her own age group.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/19 05:36 PM
1

Men that are decent looking for their age and 10x wealthier than her lmao. Only thing that has changed is the dip in physical attractiveness. She used to date (and married) model-esque men, but obviously, no one looks like a model in their 60's and 70's. Only men hit the "wall". I understand that my mother is better off than most, but I still reckon that comparative to men, women simply hit a steep incline.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/19 03:18 PM
1

Or perhaps these ego boosting delusions were there to help her mask a low self esteem? No, I've always thought my mother had some serious narcissistic tendencies. She grew up as a very attractive blonde woman in a wealthy neighborhood. She still looks decent for her age at 62. People have kissed her ass for most of her life, and as a result, she has a very high opinion of herself. Even though she'd never accept responsibility for it, her personality was instrumental in ruining both of her marria…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/19 03:14 AM
1

My own mother, man. Growing up with her was a pain. But in all seriousness, I've seen many women do this to an almost comical degree. She'll think she's "strong" despite not being strong in any notable way. "Independent" despite not actually being independent. "Smart" despite being thoroughly average in intellect. "Empathic" and can "read people's intentions well" despite frequently getting conned by businesses and burnt in relationships. "Artistic" and "creative" despite never having created an…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/19 02:10 AM
1

Culture is impacted by many things. Safety of the environment, religion, ease of living, technological advancement, the economy, war, history, law, etc. The economy is one of many factors that affect culture, and is, in and of itself, shaped by culture as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/19 01:46 AM
1

I think men tend to overestimate their attractiveness and women tend to overestimate how good their personalities are. Or how much integrity they have.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/19 01:34 AM
1

Eh, I've seen some MGTOWs say they want sex robots, artificial wombs, and want all women to die. There's extremists on all sides.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/19 08:46 PM
1

Why is she dating someone she's not attracted to, then? She's not? She said she was attracted to the one man she's ever dated.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/19 08:35 PM
5

I went to look at some studies and found something somewhat interesting. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5880534/ There is no substantial correlation between divorce and the development of MDE (Major depressive disorder). There is only a correlation between people who were already prone to depression that experienced future depressive episodes. ​ Also, on an unrelated note, males are at a higher suicide risk due increased propensity for impulsive action despite having lower overall …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/19 07:05 PM
3

"Women are children" "Women are not capable of real love" "Women like assholes" "Women are not capable of rational thinking" "AWALT" ​ These are common sentiments among RP users despite those sentiments being far more emotionally driven and ideological (has an agenda, predefined set of beliefs, and is not a passive observer). Often, RP users use anecdotal evidence to support the above because there are no conclusive studies to back those claims up. Do not move the goalposts. Do not hamster. We a…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/19 06:14 PM
1

My 62 year old mother gets 100+ messages from older men whenever she goes on dating sites. The wall is a lie lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/19 04:11 PM
1

There are some people who are not naturally compatible with anyone. Highly sociopathic, narcissistic, neurotic, and other mental disorders come to mind. Many people have to put a lot effort into maturing themselves before they're even capable of a mediocre marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/19 03:11 PM
1

Many STEM women like other STEM men. Have you ever seen a woman marry a man that was significantly less intelligent? It doesn't happen very often. Doubt many female Asian engineers want to marry Logan Paul lmao. And if we're looking at physical attributes specifically, statistically, blonde men (white men generally) are not very appealing to black women. The point is still valid. One man will never appeal to all women.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/19 03:05 PM
1

Lol no. Look into real life. Chris Brown would be a "Chad" by TRP standards, but I don't see many STEM asian women that lust after that low IQ dumbshit lmao. Take just about any real life example of a high status "Chad" and there will be certain subsections of women that aren't interested.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/19 06:43 AM
19

Women are like lobotomized men with the logic portion torn out No one explains to men the extent to which they really are just walking ATMs in the eyes of women. No one sits down men and explains to them that women really DO prefer assholes to nice guys That he may as well conceptualize the world as being filled with basic Beckys and 6 figure seeking Stacys. This is my main problem with TRP ideology. Like many ideologies, it takes statistical trends and turns them into hysterical hyperbole. No d…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/19 03:16 AM
1

He also might mean that for every odd, quirky girl that OP wants, there's hundreds of odd, quirky men that want her too. Who knows lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/19 02:11 AM
1

I think he's saying for every NAWALT there's over a hundred NAMALTs. Don't agree, though. We're merely talking about mate compatibility, not extremely population polarized mental attributes or intelligence. Bell curve logic does not apply here.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/19 01:57 AM
1

I've been cold approached a few times. It happened often at my previous workplace by customers and different department employees. Do not like it. Makes you feel put on the spot, and I'd never give out my number to some man I didn't know. ​ Approaching a woman in a bar would be a cold approach, technically. But it's an environment where approaching is expected.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/19 12:48 AM
1

Often it's some variation of this: "There's someone out there for everyone" or this: "Just be sweet and girls will like you. Looks don't matter" ​ But here are some other stinkers lmao "Sweetie, you can do anything you put your mind to" "All that matters is that you tried. It doesn't matter if you win. Here's your participation trophy, muffin." "Life will always find a way" "Love is blind" ​
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/19 12:08 AM
5

Many educated, book smart women find their spouse in college, I believe. Especially STEM field women. As for the emotionally mature part, there's no specific place to find that, unfortunately. But typically, mature people attract mature people and vice versa. So naturally, if you want a "bookish" woman, looking for one in college is your best bet.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/19 11:31 PM
1

A commitment is simply an agreement between multiple parties and/or a common dedication among multiple parties If by "commitment" we mean the promise that the man will take responsibility for the possible consequences of sex, then why not just call it "marriage"? That is the commitment from man to his offspring. A marriage is a commitment between man and woman. If by "commitment" we mean the promise that the man will provide for the woman's needs in exchange for sex, why not just call it "sugari…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/19 11:15 PM
3

How is theocracy an ideal system governmental system? Have you seen a large chunk of the middle east lately? The mass inbreeding, the pitiful technological advancement, all the suicide bombers, honor killings, executions of blasphemers, etc? And first you say the government should be ruled by AI (dangerous for humans if the AI is sentient and capable of learning, obviously). This is would be a purely "logical" approach, but then you say theocracy is the next best thing, despite it being a purely…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/19 11:02 PM
1

The blogger's writing was the real culprit here, not Feynman's. And the only two women he "direspected" in order to seduce are: A grad student's sister who already wanted to sleep with him. His conversation with her was not even that disrespectful A random woman who frequents bars and apparently enjoys being called a whore lmao. (daddy issues?)
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/19 10:33 PM
1

Felt some serious second hand embarrassment reading that Feynman link, holy shit lmao. Reads like an angsty teenager's fanfiction.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/19 10:12 PM
8

Conflating high standards for a LTR with rape/assault ??? A woman hitting a man is irrelevant here. She, and all other women, simply need to not sleep with him to weed out his genes, so why put herself at risk of injury by pointlessly picking a fight with a man?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/19 04:22 AM
1

Okay here: Every woman has at least one X chromosome lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/19 04:08 AM
6

Respect: a feeling of deep admiration for someone or something elicited by their abilities, qualities, or achievements. Lol no.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/19 04:06 AM
1

Actually, I think the media and pop culture became way more PC after the internet. Every side became more radical and hysterical. And I don't believe the alarmists are doing traditionalism any favors. The prevailing narrative is that 50% of marriages end in divorce (Not true. Annual M:D ratio is 50%), divorces are rising (Also not true. percent of failed marriages has been falling for the past 50 years), and that you shouldn't get married because you're going to be miserable and probably divorce…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/19 05:38 PM
1

I feel like I'm giving her free drugs so she can use them when she's hanging out with much hotter guys who she is actually interested in. Just fucking ask one of them out. If she says no, oh well. You clearly don't want friendship with them. Friends getting high and eating each other's food is normal.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/19 02:38 PM
1

You keep bringing up native americans as a supposed example, but you have any evidence they threw all of their women on the battlefield? I can only find a few examples where they rarely helped in battle. And it certainly was not the majority of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/19 02:11 PM
1

Seize the means of reproduction and redistribute all the pusssssy ​ It's surprising how many incels I've seen want this, though. A real alt-left? lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/19 02:17 AM
4

If you are worried about who will be your nurse when you get old and sick, then go for girls who want monogamy and convince them they have changed your serially monogamous ways GL finding anything but old divorcees with kids as an old divorcee with kids. Also GL with actually finding someone to take care of you when you're old. Your kids will probably hate you for dumping mom for a wannabe-PUA lifestyle and throw you in a shitty nursing home lmao. ​
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/19 12:09 AM
1

Generally, it's someone (man or woman) who's trying to enforce tradcon values. They shame promiscuous women in order to convince other women to not "ruin" their lives. They value community above all. That, or it's a man who's upset that a woman he's attracted to, and would've theoretically committed himself to, is now "unmarriable".
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/19 10:13 PM
1

>only one night stands >only women with limited sexual histories Good luck with that lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/19 10:01 PM
1

That's just it. That ingrained reaction does not stop a man from sleeping with a promiscuous woman, but it does stop a man from committing to that woman. That's the whole point, I think.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/19 09:35 PM
1

I think men naturally value chastity in women and dislike promiscuity to guard against parental uncertainty, maybe?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/19 09:28 PM
1

I think their point was that female mortality from pregnancy and disease was high enough that putting additional environmental pressures (like defending the tribe) would have been likely unsustainable. Prehistorically, we did not have a fraction of a percent of today's population. Making all of your post-menopausal women defend the tribe (lmao) would not have been a problem (aside form being inefficient), but again, making the fertile women do it is not smart. Not only are most of the fertile wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/19 09:14 PM
1

Just saying there's no way to know if significantly more men died (enough to account for a huge 40% chop off) before being able to reproduce if major sexual selection pressures were also at play. It's possible (and likely) that CombatStacey is correct that women had a huge mortality rate during pregnancy/childbirth, but most of them had children with a relatively small pool of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/19 08:48 PM
1

But generally, people pull the national rape statistic from the NCVS which had to guesstimate for a population in the hundreds of millions from comically smaller sample sizes. The NIS (National inmate survery) had a much smaller total population to work with, but still did some massive guesstimation of its own. In the NCVS results, women were the victims of sexual assault 9/10 of the time, but its total number was a complete shot in the dark. Same with the NIS. Hard to say with certainty where t…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/19 08:27 PM
1

66% of rape and sexual assault victims Is this true in charges/convictions? Or are we just comparing differently limited and measured surveys again?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/19 08:14 PM
3

Obviously not, but whip out the proportion calculator then, O arbiter of objectiveness. Measure facial symmetry and report back lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/19 07:49 PM
1

"I personally disagree with how someone rated another person" = Virtue signaling Nonsense
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/19 07:45 PM
1

I said socially/emotionally well-adjusted, not necessarily nice or submissive. You can be a charming, confident douchebag criminal and still get laid If you're charming, that's an indication you're socially intelligent. Socially intelligent =/= good person
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/19 07:42 PM
1

His face was definitely above average. And how am I virtue signaling?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/19 07:39 PM
1

Advice like "just be yourself" and "personality is the most important" "looks dont matter that much" etc actually work for women. This is a phrase intended to make people feel better. Simply meant to console or encourage. Most people pick up on this, regardless of "pill" ideology. Sexual relationships are based on sexual attraction. Highly attractive people are more sought after than highly unattractive people. Don't think there's many "blue pill" people out there that wouldn't agree with that. …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/19 07:20 PM
1

I find it strange that we have the lowest divorce rates since the 60's and the lowest violent crime rate since the 50's, yet it seems like people have become increasingly alarmist about these topics.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/19 06:41 PM
1

I got this type too, but I took a few other tests and got ISTP, INTJ, and ISTJ as well lmao ​ I feel like the categories are almost too broad to mean anything unless you have an extremely polarized personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/19 06:24 PM
1

This assumes those males did not reproduce due to death. A massive percentage may have been weeded out by sexual selection, not natural selection.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/19 06:08 PM
1

Dad the same type?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/19 05:47 PM
3

I think they mean that men are adopting "female dating strategies" in order to be the "prize" in the relationship, not that men literally want to transition into women. Regardless, I don't really agree with the sentiment.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/19 03:21 AM
1

Physically, yes. When I was a teenager, I thought "feminine", pretty faced men were the best looking. A lot of body hair was almost flat out repulsive to me. I turned twenty-three a few weeks ago and there's been a big shift in what I find attractive. Chest hair is very attractive to me now, many of the feminine features I liked as a teenager are a turn-off, and body is probably more important than face to me at this point. ​ I think masculinity just became more attractive as I got older tbh ​
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/19 12:40 AM
1

Nah, it's proof that nature hasn't found a better way, not that a better way doesn't exist. There is not a single surviving species on earth where the "female" (agent with the bulk of the reproductive process) is expendable. Do you think this was by accident? Given the infinite amount of possible mutations, you don't think the "expendable fertile female" model has been attempted? It almost certainly has, and expectedly, those species went extinct. Yes I do think humanity would have survived, and…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/19 10:56 PM
1

Humans would have persisted and thrived regardless, despite all the "b-b-b-b-but the fragile wimmens would die and we'd go extinct" fear mongering. And we'd have a radically different and better society now. Wishful thinking. The fact that the existing model prevailed over all others is a testament to its efficiency. Treating women as if they were men and delegating them to expendable roles is by any measure completely foolhardy. Do you really think humanity would have survived its many near ext…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/19 10:09 PM
1

No. People do not marry randomly. If you divide people along different lines (personality, intelligence, demographics), divorce rates change significantly. Highly intelligent men have a much smaller risk of divorce. Highly conscientious men have lower divorce rates. We're not playing the lottery here.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/19 08:40 PM
1

The divorce rate is not actually 50%. The yearly divorce to marriage ratio is 50%. Marriage rates are going down dramatically, so logically the percentile skews upward. Estimates of the actual divorce rate generally sits somewhere in the 30% range for couples married after 1996. It's the lowest divorce rate in the US since the 1960's, and it continues to go down every year. Of course, marriage rates continue to go down significantly every year as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/19 07:47 PM
2

How to end up in prison with a rape charge. ​ If someone is acting truly crazy the best idea is to simply leave the situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/19 04:58 PM
1

Men are stronger, and more likely to do damage. That is why the homicide rate is higher in gays. This theory doesn't really hold water as most spousal homicides are done with a knife or a firearm. They are intentional homicides. Women are weaker, but they are more likely to try to do damage. That is why lesbian relationships have more incidents of violence than hetero or gay relationships. This fails to recognize that not all violent intent is equal. The woman who throws a brush at her partner d…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/19 06:14 AM
2

I would argue impulsivity is the largest factor in violence and many other criminal behaviors. Testosterone is often regarded as the impulsivity hormone. This is why there is far more male murderers regardless of culture. In contrast, female violence is highly variable depending on the culture/country. This indicates women are much more likely to do what they can "get away with" (a woman slapping a partner is regarded trivially in the US), but are more inhibited in regard to behaviors that have …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/19 05:41 AM
1

"Sexual attraction is attraction on the basis of sexual desire or the quality of arousing such interest." "Sexual arousal (also sexual excitement) is the arousal of sexual desire" Pseudo intellectual definition hell. Regardless, your assertion that women are merely "aroused by sexual situations" is not sufficient in this case. Many women who watch gay porn are not interested in or aroused by lesbian porn. In this common scenario, these women feel more ATTRACTION to members of the opposite sex an…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/19 10:34 PM
1

Any evidence for this? Or are you just talking out the ass? ​ And if this is the case, why do so many women like gay porn? Obviously in this scenario, she would not even able to pretend to be the object of either man's sexual attraction. The two men are purely there for her own viewing pleasure.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/19 09:54 PM
17

Feminism must have been awfully powerful during the early 1930's too
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/19 08:46 PM
2

Calling a source questionable because they disagree with what violence is. Not what I said. I said the topic of domestic violence is debatable when considering different degrees of violence. Hate to say it, but it looks like the “satiricle tripe” of toxic femininity for not wanting to take responsibility for her actions. Projection.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/19 08:32 PM
8

"So the source is “highly debatable” because you think only certain types of violence should be considered? Right..... No. But there are varying degrees of violence, and this should obviously be taken into consideration when discussing a broad subject. The big thing of this that you are ignoring is men committing suicide more often in general. Feminists like to ignore this and try to point back to “but men do WORSE violence!” In order to push the feminist narrative. " Diverting the conversation.…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/19 08:29 PM
1

Took five seconds of a google search. Any evidence to prove that it's out of date? Or are you just sticking with anecdotes in order to feel like you're right?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/12/18 10:41 PM
4

Men Forced Their Own Way = Incels tbh
/r/MGTOW20/12/18 01:01 AM
1

https://psychcentral.com/news/2009/11/11/men-more-likely-to-abandon-partner-during-illness/9479.html ​ Oops
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/12/18 12:47 AM
1

Not sure why you've only mentioned Borderline Personality disorder for PSD. Men are more likely to suffer from some psychiatric disorders (Schizophrenia, Schizotypal Personality disorder, Paranoid personality disorder) which might explain the 60/40 split.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 07:00 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter