Tim-McPackage Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
8	Kindergarten teacher finds Legos are good for cognitive development in young children and bans boys from playing with them in order to "close the gender gap" Man I remember when I was a young boy, playing with my "Boy only" lego sets. This one time a girl tried playing with my "Boy only" Lego fire station play set, luckily the Lego police came around and broke her little fire engine before she got any ideas about moving onto the hard stuff, like a station.	/r/MensRights	18/04/17 02:43 PM
1	Another Perspective on the Wage Gap True, but Women are 7% less likely to negotiate for higher salaries. So that rounds it out into a nice non-existence.	/r/PussyPassDenied	13/04/17 06:46 AM
1	Affair? Hmmm.... apparently gender and age matter in rape cases. For the sake of the hypothetical let's assume they were, would that be rape?	/r/MensRights	23/03/17 05:49 PM
9	Affair? Hmmm.... apparently gender and age matter in rape cases. Hypothetical: 40 year old man rapes an 14 year old girl, she doesn't fully understand what is going on and is emotionally manipulated into it, but not forced and she finds it fun. Is that rape?	/r/MensRights	23/03/17 09:52 AM
6	Affair? Hmmm.... apparently gender and age matter in rape cases. r/iamverysmart material right here.	/r/MensRights	23/03/17 09:48 AM
12	Affair? Hmmm.... apparently gender and age matter in rape cases. Dude the kid was 14, it's statutory rape no matter which way you look at it. The reason it's bad is kids that age are super easy to coerce or emotionally manipulate, so even if he feels bad about it now it's because this rapist bitch manipulated him.	/r/MensRights	23/03/17 09:44 AM
2	Thanks, UN. The problem with identity politics is you assume everyone gives as big of a shit as you do. Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.	/r/MensRights	08/03/17 07:49 PM
4	What feminism would stand for if they were for equality Of course I'm aware it's a Jewish thing, but it's also an American thing for entirely different reasons. I think it's twisted and barbaric chopping off part of a baby to appease a god, but it's more so to do it for no reason like most of the US.	/r/MensRights	19/02/17 11:37 PM
5	What feminism would stand for if they were for equality They're examples of cosmetic surgery, that's what you called it. Or is it closer to getting your baby liposuction? What's the distinction for you that makes chopping off parts of a baby for cosmetic reasons okay only in the instance of circumcision? It's false that it's cleaner and healthier, that's a very flimsy justification given after the fact to attempt to justify it. It was done by religious fanatics to discourage masturbation. Became normalised and now it's socially acceptable. Except fro…	/r/MensRights	19/02/17 11:02 PM
7	What feminism would stand for if they were for equality Without consent. So it's not mutilation, more like giving your baby a nose job or fake tits?	/r/MensRights	19/02/17 10:49 PM
5	What feminism would stand for if they were for equality Well, what would you call unnecessarily chopping off part of a baby?	/r/MensRights	19/02/17 10:36 PM
5	What feminism would stand for if they were for equality It's a crazy american thing, it's only done if necessary for medical purposes in the rest of the civilised world. Why would you mutilate newborns?	/r/MensRights	19/02/17 10:19 PM
2	Divorcees don't need to afford lifestyle they were accustomed to in marriage, Court of Appeal judge says as he rules against ex-wife Fair point, maybe divorce without reasonable wrongdoing of one party.	/r/MensRights	13/02/17 11:48 PM
9	Divorcees don't need to afford lifestyle they were accustomed to in marriage, Court of Appeal judge says as he rules against ex-wife I know, it's a good idea but poorly implemented.	/r/MensRights	13/02/17 10:29 PM
2	Divorcees don't need to afford lifestyle they were accustomed to in marriage, Court of Appeal judge says as he rules against ex-wife Agreed, unless it can be argued the divorcee would maintain that level of lifestyle had they not got married, and for whatever reason can't now, then it should be return to either there previous lifestyle or a reasonable wage they could have had.	/r/MensRights	13/02/17 10:02 PM
213	Divorcees don't need to afford lifestyle they were accustomed to in marriage, Court of Appeal judge says as he rules against ex-wife Oh absolutely, it's meant to be a way of helping someone get back on their feet that is lacking job skills. But it gets abused by people who just want easy money, and courts favour women so you hear stories of people moving back in with family or into shitty apartments so their gold digger ex-wife can live the life of luxury. It's not a bad idea, but it needs a complete rework.	/r/MensRights	13/02/17 09:09 PM
498	Divorcees don't need to afford lifestyle they were accustomed to in marriage, Court of Appeal judge says as he rules against ex-wife There is a fair rationale behind it, in a lot of cases one partner will stop focusing on their careers to keep a home or raise kids. So they're compensated because there was a legal agreement that they would share a life together and plans were made on that basis which lowers their earning potential. But in my opinion this should only apply to people who have a divorce initiated against them (to avoid gold diggers marrying then divorcing for chunks of money), and should have a reasonable cut off…	/r/MensRights	13/02/17 08:57 PM
3	Male privilege. I did some google-fu, it seems relatively well researched. Since I couldn't read the sources in the post I found some in agreement. Mostly it aligns with the findings of this report. https://www.avoiceformen.com/the-facts-about-men-and-boys/	/r/MensRights	09/01/17 08:32 PM
2	Male privilege. That's a fair point, everyone's entitled to their opinion on what the most pressing issues are. I think it's super important but I'm looking at it from a British perspective, with suicide being the leading cause of death in British men under 50.	/r/MensRights	09/01/17 08:26 PM
3	Male privilege. Barely a minority, 40% of reported domestic violence, so sure, women are either assaulted more or more likely to report. My point to the second link is in many cases women raping men isn't classed as rape, in fact in the UK women can't legally rape a man, as being forced to penetrate is sexual assault and not rape. Additionally many studies use this definition as well. So yeah you can argue men rape women more when men are very unlikely to report and when they do it's not even counted in rape st…	/r/MensRights	09/01/17 08:12 PM
3	Male privilege. Are you sure? https://www.theguardian.com/society/2010/sep/05/men-victims-domestic-violence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_by_gender#Rape_of_males_by_females	/r/MensRights	09/01/17 07:56 PM
2	Male privilege. Well it the victims of workplace death, combat death, homicide and those that commit suicide certainly have their lives ruined.	/r/MensRights	09/01/17 07:53 PM
2	Feminist petition demanding censorship of the Red Pill movie succeeds, Melbourne screening cancelled Well at least the word is being spread, first I've heard of this film and I now support it whole heatedly.	/r/MensRights	25/10/16 10:00 PM
1	For your enjoyment, "Feminist Frequency: Women as Background Decoration: Part 1 - Tropes vs Women" in which we learn gaming corrupted the culture by using sex to sell. (Does Anita seem more botox'd then usual?) (Well, at least she changed her lumberjack shirt.) (Same hoop earrings.) I could see her having a problem with some of the strip clubs (not counting games like Fallout that have both male and female strippers), but treating NPC's as objects is not a female exclusive issue, or even an issue. She is the one making a distinction between a player beating a male NPC or a female NPC.	/r/MensRights	03/07/14 02:34 PM