TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TimRattayGotScrewed Archive

View 11 posts and 39 comments by TimRattayGotScrewed on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Because it wasn't clear what the hell you were talking about. When you are manic, you can also do things you wouldn't normally do. And even when you aren't in the midst of some mental disorder, but merely distressed for whatever reason, you can do things you wouldn't normally do. It doesn't make you any less responsible for your choices, nor does it make others responsible for protecting you from yourself. A guy gets drunk and a sober woman has unprotected sex with him, whose fault is it when sh…
/r/MGTOW21/01/17 02:25 AM
1

While drunk he put our gerbils, who had recently passed away from pneumonia, in the fire with everything else without even telling us. ....what? He was drunk and so he decided to cremate some corpses instead of letting them rot in the house or something? What the hell are you trying to say here? But I'd say you're the one that doesn't understand intoxication. And I never said it wasn't on a continuum. You are demonstrating you don't understand intoxication by talking in blanket terms about what …
/r/MGTOW21/01/17 01:17 AM
2

You told me that BPD and a manic phase of bipolar disorder are somehow less mind-altering than intoxication, proving you either don't understand what intoxication is, or you don't understand what said mental illnesses are. What you said was absurd. And "intoxication" exists on a continuum, moron. That's how the statute works and that's how it works in practice.
/r/MGTOW20/01/17 11:09 PM
1

Well, she's got you by the balls regardless. You don't even have to fuck her for her to successfully bring charges against you and tell a sob story. See: Duke Lacrosse Case.
/r/MGTOW20/01/17 11:01 PM
2

No, clearly you don't. Do you even know what "intoxication" means? It doesn't seem that you do. We are talking about intoxication, not incapacitation...in case that is where you are getting it wrong. But if you honestly think being drunk makes you more warped than a manic episode of bipolar disorder or a BPD episode, you're utterly clueless. I NEVER said "mental illness". That's getting too general. There are mental illnesses where your functionality is above that of a drunk. "A manic phase and …
/r/MGTOW20/01/17 04:08 PM
1

No, it is not. This is a myth. In some states intoxication isn't even in the statute, and in the ones where it is, such as California, it requires a level of intoxication beyond merely drunk. http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:BHZbaUDFQqsJ:www.mysati.com/Downloads/CWLR.doc+&cd=4&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us The statute does not require that a victim become so intoxicated that she is physically unable to speak or display a lack of actual consent.[71] However, mere intoxication “to some d…
/r/MGTOW20/01/17 04:04 PM
2

Here's where I got it: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:BHZbaUDFQqsJ:www.mysati.com/Downloads/CWLR.doc+&cd=4&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us The statute does not require that a victim become so intoxicated that she is physically unable to speak or display a lack of actual consent.[71] However, mere intoxication “to some degree,” or intoxication that “reduced the [woman’s] sexual inhibitions” is not sufficient.[72] As one California prosecutor explained from her experience prosecuting rap…
/r/MGTOW20/01/17 12:53 PM
1

I thought you said you work in the field. I took some criminal justice classes when I was in college, too. Doesn't make an expert. I just know the laws based on researching them on the internet.
/r/MGTOW20/01/17 12:39 PM
3

Dude, you most certainly don't work in this field, as evidenced by the fact that you are making claims that are demonstrably false. No, they will not always void it. They can if they feel there was some kind of malicious, manipulative intent, but there is no statute that says drunk people can not legally sign contracts, as you alleged. What you did was Google it, see the exceptions where it could be voided, and then claim they are "always" voided (which isn't true) to defend your false claim, at…
/r/MGTOW20/01/17 12:35 PM
2

You didn't study anything. You have already established you don't even know what the laws are. It's funny watching you attempt to invent credentials for yourself on the internet, but next time you might want to check with Google before you do.
/r/MGTOW20/01/17 12:25 PM
3

First of all, YES, drunk people can legally sign contracts. I don't know where you get the idea it's rendered null and void, but a quick Google search shows you pulled that out of your ass. Secondly, let me pose this question to you: Let's say a sober woman has sex with a drunk man and gets pregnant. Is the drunk man who consented to sex while drunk (but apparently "couldn't consent," according to you) still on the hook for child support? Hmmm...methinks the answer is a resounding, "yes." Also, …
/r/MGTOW20/01/17 12:19 PM
2

lmfao, there absolutely is a case How do you not get it? You don't get a pass when you violate and kill people. For one thing because it is at someone else's expense. You keep using the word "choose". We don't really know that a drunk person "chose" to have sex because they weren't in a reliable state of mind. It is INVALID. So what? Why does your behavior stop being your responsibility when it's not a crime? And of course they chose it. Just as they chose to commit a crime and are held responsi…
/r/MGTOW20/01/17 09:58 AM
6

So what? Why is it not an excuse to not be in your right mind when you choose to commit crimes but not when you choose to do something legal? Where's the logic in that? It's hilarious watching you spin in circles because you know you don't have a case. Just as it isn't other people's responsibility to take care of you when you are driving drunk, it's not a guy's responsibility to make sure you are in "your right state of mind" when having sex. You choose to drink and you choose all the consequen…
/r/MGTOW20/01/17 09:26 AM
7

Why are you completely responsible for any bad acts you commit while you're intoxicated, but absolved of all responsibility when it comes to choosing to have sex? You get drunk, choose to hop behind the wheel of a car, and kill people...jail time. You get drunk and kill someone...prison time, possibly the death penalty. You get drunk and rape someone...prison. Nobody else is responsible for your actions while drunk. If you consent while drunk, that's on you. The fact that you don't want to admit…
/r/MGTOW20/01/17 09:16 AM
7

No, you're not. People are responsible for their own decisions while intoxicated. That's why "but I was too drunk to know what I was doing" is not a defense for driving while intoxicated, or murdering someone, or raping someone, etc.
/r/MGTOW20/01/17 09:02 AM
4

There's nothing wrong with fucking a woman who is drunk, idiot.
/r/MGTOW20/01/17 08:56 AM
19

One thing I find interesting is how women and feminized men these days talk about Walt's ego/pride in not accepting the money from Gretchen/Elliott as though it's somehow unacceptable. "He didn't have to cook, they offered to pay for his treatment!!!111" I don't know about you, but if I was dying and my worst enemy offered to pay for my treatment, I would also tell him to go fuck himself. Apparently having some actual self respect is a thing of the past. It's "toxic masculinity," I guess.
/r/MGTOW11/01/17 11:13 PM
3

Oh my Gawd, it's sooooooo hawt.
/r/MGTOW08/11/16 12:40 PM
6

Well, if at any point they were arguing with you, they will never, ever, ever admit they were wrong. They could argue the sky isn't blue, and after you drag them outside and point at the sky, they would change the subject. So in answer to your question - they will only admit something was their fault if they were not engaged in a dispute. For example: Something goes wrong and before you have a chance to accuse her of anything, she admits this.
/r/MGTOW12/10/16 04:11 PM
3

Based on what? You've been listening to too much groupthink talk, which is based on absolutely nothing other than a bunch of SJWs and liberal media sources predictably freaking out that he would so brazenly eschew political correctness. He gets compared to Hitler despite preaching his love for Israel, saying he was going to protect gays after the Orlando shooting, and bashing Hillary for letting down black people. Yeah, that sure sounds like Hitler to me.
/r/MGTOW12/10/16 02:35 PM
0

End women's suffrage. It's the humane thing to do.
/r/MGTOW12/10/16 02:28 PM
0

Last I checked, the law says "incapacitated," not "intoxicated." Just bad writing.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 02:02 AM
1

All of them? This doesn't mean they are conceding you won, this means they are pretending they won by not engaging you in the first place. The moment you bring out logic, facts, or even just confidence you are correct, they look for the nearest exit. Then they tell themselves they were right.
/r/MGTOW02/10/16 02:36 AM
14

"He's not normally my type," = I'm going to fuck him. "I want someone smart, and ffff-uNNN-eeeee." "creepy" "let's just drop it/let's agree to disagree" - whenever they don't win the argument within about 30 seconds. Any man who shows a spine vs. a woman in an argument is going to see her opt out in the blink of an eye. It's incredible. I have experienced this so many times with women of all ages about all kinds of different things.
/r/MGTOW01/10/16 04:36 AM
2

Look at how sloppily her face is constructed. Look at the bulbous nose. Look at the weird eyelids framing the giant eyes. Look at the crappy excuse for lips. If men actually paid close attention to female looks the way women do the opposite, I'm sure we could rate 80% of them as "below average" in looks as well. Instead, that chick could get regularly dicked by about 95% of all heterosexual men if she wanted.
/r/MGTOW28/09/16 03:50 AM
3

Men beating up men = hit the gym, brah. Don't talk shit, brah.
/r/MGTOW26/09/16 08:42 AM
1

Food >
/r/MGTOW25/09/16 06:05 AM
36

I think he's a loser with no ambition that doesn't work for what he wants in life. A woman is saying this. A woman whose "ambition" is most likely buying cuuuute clothessss and posting cuuuute pixxxx to instagram and pinterest.
/r/MGTOW23/09/16 09:20 PM
6

"Love makes sex waaaaay bettuh!"
/r/MGTOW22/09/16 03:12 AM
5

Hmmmm....I wonder which sex posts more of these.
/r/MGTOW22/09/16 12:55 AM
2

I used to work at a university with very high academic standards. Most of the chicks there could have been mistaken for valley girls.
/r/MGTOW21/09/16 08:42 AM
5

Yeah, when they say you don't have to be Brad Pitt to get women, take that literally. You don't have to be a male model, you only have to be really hot. When they say they would date an "average-looking guy if he had a great personality," take that to mean they would date what they consider "average" (better looking than 80% of all men) if he was also a cocky douchebag with all the superficial characteristics for the winning/cool facade they wish to project to others. If she says her boyfriend i…
/r/MGTOW18/09/16 06:59 AM
78

Women complaining about leaving the toilet seat up is a microcosm of how unbelievably ridiculous they are. It takes less than 1 fucking second to put the fucking seat down. Sometimes I have to take an urgent shit. You know what I do? I run into the bathroom, put the fucking seat down, and take a fucking shit.
/r/MGTOW16/09/16 05:25 PM
1

Hating even one woman is considered "misogyny" these days.
/r/MGTOW15/09/16 12:31 AM
0

When it comes to false rape accusations, I personally believe in "corrective rape."
/r/MGTOW14/09/16 09:38 PM
2

I think all men who are falsely accused of rape should - assuming they get the chance - really rape the woman who accused them. That should be the new policy - you falsely accuse a man of rape, you get raped. That's the only solution I see. Only problem is it's not always easy to do.
/r/MGTOW14/09/16 09:33 PM
3

I think the "Dick Masterson" character pretty much nailed it, but what he said isn't relevant today in the west because a bunch of pussy men gave women so much power and insist on protecting it for them. "You can't blame a woman for what she does wrong any more than you can blame a dog for what it does wrong. It's your fault for not training it properly."
/r/MGTOW14/09/16 03:05 AM
5

If we're being honest...probably for similar reasons men become white knight feminist cucks. They figure it's a good way to attract guys.
/r/MGTOW09/09/16 12:07 PM
7

What "woman beating?" Why is that even a term? Do you talk about "man beating?" The point is, if you're going to argue that in some situations, men can "deserve" to get the shit beat out of them, then so can women, in exactly the same situations. Otherwise, doing it to anyone should be equally detested. No need for all these tears over women being the recipients when men are far, far, FAR more often the victims of violence.
/r/MGTOW04/09/16 11:15 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter