TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Timely_Jury Archive

View 0 posts and 25 comments by Timely_Jury on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

They're a special kind of atheist, whom we can call Reddit atheists, fedora atheists, or Rationalists™. I think it comes from a feeling of intellectual superiority these people tend to have.
/r/ExRedPill02/03/23 10:02 PM
1

online dating has changed human relationships in some drastic way. Online dating has allowed people the option to search through a limitless supply of suitors from the comfort of their homes, making it impossible for them to commit to anyone because there is always the possibility of someone better coming along. Before online dating, you could only date within your social circle, and it is simply impossible for a person's social circle to have more than ~150 people, so your options were limited …
/r/ExRedPill02/03/23 09:54 PM
1

While the way he phrases some of his claims leaves a lot to be desired, the DNA evidence he brings up is uncontestable.
/r/ExRedPill01/03/23 09:54 PM
-1

even with the rise of online dating, the figures still hold up globally. You have any statistical evidence in favor of this claim?
/r/ExRedPill01/03/23 04:40 PM
0

Russia does have more rigid gender roles, but how can it be said that it's working out - for women and for men - if it ultimately leads to divorce so much? Russia also has a gender ratio heavily skewed in favor of men and severe economic problems since the destruction of the Soviet Union. Both of these factors are strongly correlated with marital instability.
/r/ExRedPill01/03/23 04:39 PM
-1

These statistics are from 2006-2010, and so are outdated. Especially because they pre-date the rise of online dating. The pre- and post-online dating worlds are so different that they might even be considered entirely different cultures.
/r/ExRedPill01/03/23 04:15 PM
-1

While only 40% of men historically reproduced, 80% of women did. 10% of guys are gay. And some percent of guys die before they’re old enough to have kids (especially when there are wars. Or famines. These skew the numbers massively) a percentage of men used to die in childhood. and some percentage of men don’t want to have children. All of these things (except for wars) should've affected men and women equally. Thus, these things cannot explain why twice as many women were historically successfu…
/r/ExRedPill01/03/23 04:08 PM
-1

Some men are gay. Some men don’t want to have children. While only 40% of men historically reproduced, 80% of women did. There is zero reason to believe that women were significantly less likely to be inclined to lesbianism or not want children than men. wars (in which 10s of millions of young men have died over the last 100 years alone) famines (probably claimed MORE lives) pandemics (etc.), forced governmental controls of reproduction (there are a ton of people in China) etc. Except for wars, …
/r/ExRedPill01/03/23 04:03 PM
3

women gathered around a small minority of high status men While that is true historically, I would've thought that the strong tradition of monogamy in American (and Western Christian, by extension) culture would've militated against this, especially given the tremendous value traditionally given to mutual commitment in relationships in our culture. Honestly, I find it very difficult to believe that so many women are willing to become mistresses or concubines of high-status men. Every woman I've …
/r/ExRedPill01/03/23 11:46 AM
1

It is very unlikely that the phenomenon you're talking about can cause such an extreme difference though. However, I do agree with you on that it might have some contribution.
/r/ExRedPill01/03/23 10:33 AM
3

Maybe. Maybe not. The question is impossible to settle unless more data is available.
/r/ExRedPill01/03/23 08:45 AM
2

Most young women are not single. That is the whole point of the data. Your claims are arguing the opposite.
/r/ExRedPill01/03/23 08:15 AM
0

63 percent of young men are single. Only 34 percent of young women are. The only way that is mathematically possible is if one young man is partnered with two young women on average, a lot of women are dating each other, or women are dating men significantly older than themselves. The second is impossible because less than 20% of the population in this age group is LGBT and there is no evidence to suggest that women are significantly more likely to identify as LGBT than men. The third is impossi…
/r/ExRedPill01/03/23 08:00 AM
3

Women (and men) are attracted to confidence. And Dark Triad people are able to give off a very convincing illusion of confidence. Simple as that. Keep in mind that it is entirely possible to be confident without being a Dark Triad individual.
/r/ExRedPill17/02/23 10:48 PM
1

This will be my final comment. As I've already said before, it varies from case to case, and some people see emotional expression in males as a positive, while others see it as a negative. Before opening up, look at the people around you and assess their likely response. Only exhibit vulnerability in front of those who are likely to appreciate it.
/r/ExRedPill26/01/23 03:58 PM
1

Reddit polls are not exactly scientifically valid, y'know? And the comments are full of anecdotes about how emotional expression turned out to be a turn-off for the people surrounding them. In any case, it varies from individual to individual, as I've already said. It's better to be safe than sorry. You don't want to ruin a perfectly good friendship or relationship by an inopportune exhibition of vulnerability.
/r/ExRedPill26/01/23 11:48 AM
1

RP is the belief that all women are biologically like that. I never said that. All I'm saying is that quite a lot of both men and women are like that. So it would be prudent for men to be discreet in when it comes to exhibiting emotions. Some people might take it well, but many others might not.
/r/ExRedPill26/01/23 11:33 AM
1

I'm no RPer, lol. I'm just speaking from personal experience. My own wife (and my women friends) laughed at me when I felt sad over the death of a crow whom I had fed and cared for for years. Contrary to the claims here, most women react very negatively to men exhibiting sentiment, at least in my experience.
/r/ExRedPill26/01/23 05:54 AM
1

No. I hate how the 1950s are stereotyped like this. Yes, it is true that the lack of opportunities for women (and racial and sexual minorities) made it difficult for women stuck in abusive marriages to leave. But that certainly does not mean that more than a tiny number of relationships were like that. The overwhelming majority of men and women were in mature, respectful and fulfilling relationships like in any other time in human history. I have too much respect for my grandparents to believe i…
/r/ExRedPill24/01/23 10:36 PM
0

Yes, but I also had crying in front of friends and romantic partners in mind.
/r/ExRedPill24/01/23 06:07 PM
1

The word 'gender' here is misleading. This section is talking about stereotypical gender roles, which are obviously social constructs, given that they tremendously vary from place to place and era to era. Gender, however, is absolutely biological and innate. Male and female genitalia are not social constructs, lol.
/r/ExRedPill24/01/23 06:01 PM
0

For example, if you face a personal loss, I don't think it is right to make it a problem for others by publicly crying, for instance. Basically, you're externalizing the issue and causing headaches for people who had nothing to do with it.
/r/ExRedPill24/01/23 05:38 PM
1

Most people don't want to be other people's unpaid therapists. They also don't generally like those who cause too much drama. This guide says that it would be a good thing if men cried more and outwardly exhibited emotional distress more frequently, but that would fray those men's relationships for the reasons I described above.
/r/ExRedPill24/01/23 05:14 PM
-1

No one. Just my surprise after reading the guidelines. They are not healthy.
/r/ExRedPill24/01/23 04:18 PM
1

So achievement and good emotional control are a sign of toxicity?
/r/ExRedPill24/01/23 09:39 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter