TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TinyTwinz3D Archive

View 0 posts and 140 comments by TinyTwinz3D on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

How to tell the world you're a progressive, without saying it outright...
/r/MensRights29/11/23 01:04 AM
3

You mean back in the 50s? It's amazing how little of even very recent history people have a clue about. It's like you watch "footloose" and conclude dancing was illegal prior to 1990. Truly frightening how ignorant, and proudly so, people are these days.
/r/MensRights29/11/23 12:56 AM
-9

David Bowie and Freddie Mercury MIGHT have been sex symbols...to men. They were both openly gay. And who is "Jarvis Cocker"? You mean Joe Cocker, the old guy who sings spasticity? Yeah, not a sex symbol...to anyone. Us older guys are cringing at the surety you are right, when placed against the background of your ignorance.
/r/MensRights29/11/23 12:50 AM
0

You deserve quite a bit less than you got.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 10:36 PM
0

So....you're a brainwashed crazy person, and you just don't understand why people don't buy your made up bullshit and extreme spin. It must be Wednesday. Arrogant ignorance...the hallmark of the Communist... Here's a hint. You're wrong. Very very wrong. You won't believe it, he'll, you likely won't even consider the possibility. And that's why Communism isn't dead yet...too many Secret Kings want to educate the unwashed.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 05:32 PM
0

I think you mis spelled "accurate analysis".
/r/MensRights13/09/23 05:11 PM
1

No True Scotsman....
/r/MensRights13/09/23 04:42 PM
2

All feminists are man haters. Anyone who believes "men oppressed women" is not only a feminist, they are a Radical Feminist. There is NO SUCH THING as a "good" feminist.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 04:40 PM
3

"For women, equality and nothing less. For men, equality and nothing more." A quote from an original "all about equality" feminist. IOW, you're full of shit.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 04:38 PM
2

Look. Feminism and Marxism have been synonymous since the early 1960s. I'm getting pretty tired of a bunch of maleducated, smug morons trying to rewrite reality. This "issue" has been settled for decades. So...I don't give fuck one if you disagree, feminism is the freaking POSTER CHILD of extremist hard left ideology. I get that you can't take the cognitive dissonance of being a Leftist anti feminist. That's no one's problem but yours.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 04:28 PM
1

Beauty is a mathematical relationship, closely following the Fibonacci sequence. Symmetry from side to side, certain distance ratios between facial "landmarks", and certain size ratios os those features. Beauty is actually a universal, measurable thing...not objective at all.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 03:14 PM
3

Ha! That's the most ridiculous spin I've heard in a while. At least TRY and make it believable.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 03:07 PM
4

They are variations on a theme, barely distinguishable from each other. As is feminism.
/r/MensRights12/09/23 08:58 PM
1

The man is a feminist. That's all you need to know.
/r/MensRights11/09/23 03:46 PM
1

Things like this are why people like Pearl are valuable. Women listen to other women. They do not, generally, listen to men.
/r/MensRights29/08/23 05:56 PM
1

So...Not All Feminists Are Like That....only for political persuasion. Got it.
/r/MensRights29/08/23 04:59 PM
1

This sub became majority left wing because lefties took over the mod positions, and systematically eliminated anyone to the right of Mao. Which explains why the dweeb here hate things like the Manosphere, and Red Pill. Because those sorts of guys USED TO be here too. But they left to actually do something. Which leaves the whiny liberals here to commiserate.
/r/MensRights29/08/23 04:58 PM
1

That certain political stance is the ONLY one pushing the most egregious offenses. The shoe fits. And lefties are gonna wear it.
/r/MensRights29/08/23 04:55 PM
13

Oh look. Another lefty trying to steer the movement. Lemme guess, not all women are like that, and thats not real feminism... Got it. This crap is becoming a stereotype.
/r/MensRights25/08/23 09:58 PM
6

More fear of looking bad from a spineless nerd. Yeah, follow this guy. He'll get things done!
/r/MensRights25/08/23 04:56 PM
6

Truth, to a Communist, is fascism. Got it.
/r/MensRights25/08/23 04:54 PM
2

There a religious aspect to that grouping. Someday it will be common knowledge.
/r/MensRights25/08/23 04:53 PM
1

Actually, yes I was "in the room" so to speak. Thanks for asking. And the point of the post is to be a scared little bitch whenever a lefty criticizes mens activists. Which I most definitely take issue with. You don't know the history. Frankly, damn near none of you even know the meaning of simple terms like redpilled. It's sad that you people think you know anything at all about this movement. Worse that you argue completely fabricated points.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 09:43 PM
-1

Your fear of "looking bad" is what I take issue with most. Are you made of baby parts? No? Well then stand up. Stop scurrying to avoid obviously bad faith criticism. IOW, be an actual activist.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 09:40 PM
2

This does: "Now initially the term "manosphere" was created as an attempt to stigmatize and marginalize male voices," And it's a load of total bullshit.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 05:21 PM
0

You are either deliberately lying, or attempting to co opt and steer. You are dead wrong about the origins of the term "manosphere"...Basically, your entire take in this post is about as wrong as you can be. WE CREATED THE TERM almost 2 decades ago. It is becoming popular now because the ideas are hitting the mainstream. You are attempting to staunch that public awareness by trying to convince MRAs the term is derogatory. It is not, and NEVER WAS.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 03:50 PM
3

Bullshit. Troll.
/r/MensRights22/08/23 05:27 PM
1

Ummm...bullshit. 40% of men and 85% of women have reproduced historically. Not 5%.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 09:24 PM
1

Tradcons ARE part of the manosphere. Since day one. Wow, does NO ONE here have a memory?
/r/MensRights17/08/23 05:53 PM
1

Oh they are quite aware they are lying. And if you go to the trouble of proving they are lying, they will vaporize and pop up somewhere else, spouting the same lies. Which should clue you in that none of what is happening was an accident, these outcomes were intended from day one.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 05:43 PM
1

Oh? Do tell.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 05:35 PM
1

Is it true? Because it IS possible...even likely.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 05:03 PM
1

Ok stretch.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 05:02 PM
1

No, it isn't. I'm noticing a pattern here, with "MRAs" like yourself trying to restructure the Manosphere. WE called ourselves, and MGTOW, and PUAs, and Traditionalists like Toy Soldier or Athol Kay collectively the Manosphere in 2009. Stop lying.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 04:55 PM
1

WE "lumped them together" in 2009. Learn your damned history people! Oh, and Red Pill means understanding you were lied to, that reality is not as its portrayed. It is most emphatically NOT pua, or game-centric. It's only the appeal of that subject that makes people think so. (Source: memory. I was there at the time).
/r/MensRights16/08/23 04:52 PM
4

Thats how you know his politics. Only a lefty views wiki as anything other than rank propaganda.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 09:56 PM
-1

Wrong.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 09:53 PM
-1

So you have over a million subs? Face it. Your Leftist rhetoric echoes feminist and SJW talking points...and Pearl echos manosphere points. Pearl crushes you in popularity. But you're convinced you are "right" and she is a scammer. Jealousy. Nothing more.
/r/MensRights11/08/23 05:12 PM
1

When you stand for nothing, you fall for anything. This is a space for MENs rights. All those other groups are represented (better) elsewhere.
/r/MensRights11/08/23 05:09 PM
2

SJW seagull detected.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 04:14 PM
0

Just plain wrong huh? Funny how you don't see what you're doing there.
/r/MensRights09/08/23 02:54 PM
1

You need to respect our choice of words. We do not need correcting.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 09:39 PM
1

Trans issues are not mens issues. As long as you can respect that, you're welcome.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 09:38 PM
0

Why listen to anyone that "calls out" people for wrongthink?
/r/MensRights08/08/23 09:12 PM
-2

TinMen are jealous of pearls success, so they constantly attack her. TinMen does not resonate...either with men OR women. Pearl does. Petty jealousy virtually defines this movement now. What a bunch of weak ass people.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 09:11 PM
1

Several people on this thread have already admitted her rhetoric is identical to the manosphere...you say reactionary...I say you're just using Progressive buzzwords to attack...you have no examples. Asking a clarifying question means assuming you're not a woke troll...a shoe that fits a LOT of the people criticizing pearl and others...
/r/MensRights04/08/23 11:28 PM
1

The stuff she says....like repeating manosphere talking points verbatim? I'm losing track of the jealousy...er...criticisms, apparently. And have ANY of you hypocrites noticed Pearl is actually making inroads with women? Do any of you recognize the importance of that? Probably not. You're too busy examining minutae for impurity... Sheesh.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 07:57 PM
0

Ok buddy. I learned long ago not to bother with postmodernism freaks...there is no getting through. If you're one of those people that think human nature does not exist, we'll, then there's no helping you. That kind of person is an object lesson for the rest of us, nothing more.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 05:56 PM
0

Oh God, a blank-slater. You don't believe human nature exists? Well, continue to be "skeptical"...there some people you just can't fix.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 02:41 PM
13

Women wanting to marry up is a product of human nature. Feminists, should they ever try, are likely to find women will flat out refuse to change their ways. At best, they will advocate other women do so.
/r/MensRights03/08/23 09:26 PM
1

And that will happen until the moment "everybody knows" mens rights are important. Gotta get over the need for swift change. Things don't work that way.
/r/MensRights03/08/23 01:49 PM
10

In the 32 years I have been involved, there has been a massive shift in public awareness. Yes, the same issues are still problems, but the sheer number of people talking about them is infinitely larger than I hoped it could get to. It's just not MRAs doing it. It's people this subreddit hate. Andrew Tate. Fresh and Fit. Pearl. Bo Refec. You know..."redpillers". Sticks in the craw of a lot of folks around here, which is why they constantly complain everyone is paying attention to the "wrong" peop…
/r/MensRights03/08/23 12:11 AM
1

Awww. Poor blowhard ran out of cheap insults. I thought you were the face of the "new MRM"... a massive improvement over those that actually did the work you're attempting to use to grift. What happened?
/r/MensRights02/08/23 10:41 PM
1

More curious as to why you went straight to jews....
/r/MensRights02/08/23 02:55 PM
0

Read your comment. Then look in the mirror.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 02:54 PM
1

I suppose that makes sense, since I am what you might call a 'founding member' of the MRM. And was personally responsible for popularizing a lot of the 'memes' you guys quote like it came out of the Bible. As to the arrogant/entitled bit...well, it's tough watching you guys fuck things up so badly. Maybe if you had 20 plus years of this under your belt you would understand. Hey, aren't you the guy that royally screwed up a podcast appearance...making the manosphere look bad?
/r/MensRights02/08/23 02:50 PM
1

How exactly does she damage men and boys advocacy? I assume not simply because she is a conservative...
/r/MensRights01/08/23 10:18 PM
0

Am I?
/r/MensRights01/08/23 10:16 PM
1

You presume da jooz? Are you antisemitic?
/r/MensRights01/08/23 10:16 PM
3

Oh? Why is that?
/r/MensRights01/08/23 10:15 PM
-3

You're not confused at all. You just need to think.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 09:18 PM
1

Obsidian, for one. Who incidentally is the guy who wrote much of what KS popularized. But you miss the point. I didn't say he wasn't needed, or effective. But he was a salesman. A marketer. Not a philosopher.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 09:12 PM
-1

And you also have your head up your ass if you think Wikipedia is a reliable source, unbiased in analysis. That's the most progressive excuse for a dictionary ever to exist. Perhaps you could outline which economic and social goals Nazis had that were expressly right wing. Keep in mind, everyone is aware that "nazis were right wing" is the narrative...but where is the proof? Ever listen to a Hitler speech? Know what he was talking about? Odd how much like Obama he sounded like,, isn't it? "dicta…
/r/MensRights01/08/23 09:10 PM
12

I gotta ask...what did white men do that was so horrible that, say, Arab or black or Chinese men didn't do?
/r/MensRights01/08/23 09:02 PM
2

White? Or other ethnic group that looks white, but hates white people?
/r/MensRights01/08/23 09:00 PM
1

The National Socialist German Workers Party (Nazis) was ABSOLUTELY left wing, and fascism, specifically the flavor endorsed by Mussolini, was very much a left wing ideology. Yes, they competed with Communism, but ideologically the two were very close, the main difference being Socialism and Corporatism are intertwined, and Communism is monolithically totalitarian. Frankly, anyone claiming the Nazis were right wing betrays themselves as historically illiterate.
/r/MensRights31/07/23 09:17 PM
1

Right. He was a great salesman. That's not an insult. But he wasn't original at all.
/r/MensRights31/07/23 08:47 PM
1

Guys are men, men are not gays. But then, you know that, even if it goes against your agenda.
/r/MensRights31/07/23 08:46 PM
1

KS just regurgitated manosphere talking points. He was an excellent salesman. He was not an original thinker. Everything he said, had been said in the manosphere for 2 decades. But, the Manosphere needs salesmen way more than theoreticians. So it was a good fit.
/r/MensRights28/07/23 11:16 PM
1

From my perspective you're trying to turn the MRM into yet another group of woke assholes. You guys are fucking this thing up royally. The only saving grace is you're so bad at marketing no one pays you any attention.
/r/MensRights28/07/23 10:54 PM
1

Kevin Samuel's didn't express a single 'original' thought. But he's the Godfather? Pearl has over a million subscribers, reaches thousands of women per day, and you're batching and complaining she's not original? Are YOU original? You have completely unique perspectives that will set the world on fire? When I got involved in this, in 1991 I might add, our goal was to get the message out. Pearl by your own admission does not deviate from typical manosphere perspectives. So yes, she is doing WAY m…
/r/MensRights28/07/23 10:52 PM
2

Gay rights are not mens rights. Mens rights are not gay rights. You're pushing a Leftist agenda that no one on the right shares. So you're partisan politically, as well. You do not represent or defend men. You defend your personal agenda.
/r/MensRights28/07/23 10:43 PM
2

I'll just make this easy... I've been involved in these discussions since 1991. Your take on the issues is IDENTICAL to the feminist 'patriarchy hurts men too' argument, and also with the argument men should be free to be feminine. Those are arguments that WOMEN and FEMINISTS make. Some even think men care about that stuff. But they are essentially "men are defective girls" or worse 'men aren't allowed to be girls and they want to be'. Those points DO NOT represent either what men want, or what …
/r/MensRights26/07/23 10:27 PM
1

I put in 20 years. More than any of the asshats around here deserve.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 10:12 PM
1

Down voted for using "cis".
/r/MensRights26/07/23 05:09 PM
1

It's not a mens issue. It's a gay issue.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 04:52 PM
2

When you see a feminist "advocate for men" it is ALWAYS this same take. Feminine men / gay men are never attacked by feminists. Masculine men are. Now, you either haven't noticed, or you share the agenda. Either way, the VAST majority of men are not served by the it's alright to cry shit the left has been spewing since Free To Be You And Me came out in the 1970s.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 04:48 PM
1

So?
/r/MensRights26/07/23 04:44 PM
5

Fair enough. Just keep in mind, feminists have earned their reputation. Taking the label means YOU will be viewed in the same light... You will not reform feminists Image, you'll just look like another man hating feminist lying through her teeth.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 05:30 PM
-1

Are you saying Satanism doesn't exist? That no one is a part of a death cult? Do you think YOU have to believe for it to be a thing? That's serious solipsism right there.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 05:10 PM
1

So you reject feminist characterizations....except where you need to show virtue. Gotcha. Or...and I'm just spitballing here....you could tell those connecting the groups their bigotry is showing, and leave it at that. Nah.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 10:39 PM
2

Read your linked article to yourself, and ask "If the bits I said about white males were said about ANY other group, would it be considered racist/sexist? You're obviously Progressive (read: white male hater). You should at least be open about that.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 10:35 PM
-6

...but grifter. Woman regurgitating manosphere content. Waaah! She is making a ton of money doing what men in the manosphere SHOULD HAVE DONE THEMSELVES. Now the "men" complain...but still do nothing. Better to be pure and ignored, one wonders? Asshats.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 10:28 PM
-5

Ahhh, the jealousy. She is good at what she does and spreads the message further than the MRM ever did....but grifter because purity spiraling... 95% of the men here have never done a single thing to effect change. But they're darn sure when someone doesn't deserve their success. Sour grapes guys. Either outdo her, or shut up. Your petulant whining is embarrassing.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 10:25 PM
2

Wow. You really know absolutely nothing about history. Here's a hint...women got the vote in 1920. Same time as non landowning men. Women could always work. I mean wow...who taught you that utter crap?
/r/MensRights24/07/23 10:17 PM
3

Men don't want to cry, or wear nail polish, or any other femme thing you feminists want us to do. We do not want to be more like women. But it seems every time a woman "stands up" for men, it's to allow men to be more feminine. And feminine men aren't the ones under attack...masculine men are. So, to all reading the utter bullshit above, consider this... This woman has obviously not talked to a single man about what concerns him. This woman is listing off every "Patriarchy Hurts Men Too" argumen…
/r/MensRights24/07/23 10:15 PM
2

You're convincing no one. Feminists gonna man hate. Then tell you they didn't. Also...the sky is blue.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 10:04 PM
4

Canadian Charter of Rights, section 15.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 05:10 PM
5

I read the linked article. No thanks. No desire to be the subject of yet another hit piece.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 04:56 PM
1

Missing the point. Those that are doing this are acting from a religious belief. It's a very old cult, and it's very real. Historical even. You don't have to believe in a sky daddy, but if they do, and believe sky daddy wants you eradicated, they will approach the task with religious zeal. Whether you're contemptuous or not is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 12:22 AM
9

I'm an angry white male...so obviously I can't possibly have anything valid to say. Maybe another journalist might want to hear from me and other angry white men. But I won't hold my breath. The bigotry endemic to the journalist class just won't allow a white guy to be seen as anything but evil.
/r/MensRights20/07/23 10:23 PM
1

Well, considering MGTOW started as MRAs that gave up ever achieving political ends, I'd say they're pretty intimately connected. Incels (TFLers) just sort of attached themselves to MGTOW. Basically, they ARE related. More importantly, why do you seek to separate yourself? Afraid of looking bad? Falling for divide and conquer tactics is not what men should do.
/r/MensRights20/07/23 03:19 PM
2

Invaded? I think you need to brush up on your history. Feminism has been, since it's inception, a female supremacist, man hating cult.
/r/MensRights19/07/23 10:08 PM
2

Didn't take long for you to expose yourself as yet another man hating feminist "just asking questions".. The ONLY purpose you serve is to show men there is no such thing as a good feminist. Don't worry though, you're merely the latest in a list at least 20 thousand feminists long.
/r/MensRights19/07/23 10:05 PM
1

Hunter S Thompson....pedophile, Satanist, and murderer... Icky.
/r/MensRights19/07/23 09:44 PM
0

So...you're jealous then. Understood.
/r/MensRights13/07/23 05:13 PM
1

I think you're a tad deluded if you don't apply the hypocrite label firmly to your lapel.
/r/MensRights13/07/23 05:10 PM
1

Exactly. More proof (as of it was needed) that 90+% of "MRAs" are spineless followers, ruled by jealousy and spite. The "activists" here passionately engage in the exact same behavior they complain about, every day. I am SO glad I abandoned this movement for losers 8 years ago. Not surprised at all to see the Leftist entryism has all but completely gutted a movement that USED TO speak "truth to power" but now supports the Current Thing. Utterly disappointing.
/r/MensRights13/07/23 05:08 PM
1

It's Canada. You will likely not "qualify" for legal aid. They will find a reason.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 04:23 PM
3

Almost 25 years on....still happening. Get used to it.
/r/MensRights09/07/23 11:47 PM
2

Feminism is a gynocentric death cult barely distinguishable from Satanism. It mirrors nearly every belief several ancient religions adhered to, including free love and transsexuals, and most especially hatred of men. Anyone who knows anything about history can see it quite plainly.
/r/MensRights07/07/23 08:45 PM
3

More like Hive-Mind.
/r/MensRights07/07/23 02:56 PM
5

Read the Canadian charter of rights, section 15:1 -15:2. Tell me when a straight white male is considered "historically disadvantaged", and when literally every other group isn't. You can't discriminate AGAINST straight white men. But you CAN discriminate in favor of every other demographic, often all at once (IOW everyone BUT straight white males qualify). That's our Constitution....doesn't get much more "systemic" than that.
/r/MensRights07/07/23 02:41 PM
-2

Trans issues are not mens issues. Even if they are the Current Thing (tm). Trans issues are Left Wing issues, not mens issues. But since when has logic had anything to do with the mod work here?
/r/MensRights07/07/23 02:37 PM
115

...which is another example of how biased, and frankly shit, the "open source" dictionary is.... Plus, the sky is blue.
/r/MensRights06/07/23 11:09 PM
8

Reverse that saying and you're closer to the truth.
/r/MensRights06/07/23 09:26 PM
4

Pay wall.
/r/MensRights06/07/23 05:19 PM
8

How about the simple answer of what "findom" is a shortened form of. We are not children needing protection from bad thoughts. Treat us like grown ups, or simply don't post if you're unwilling to give a straight answer to a simple question.
/r/MensRights06/07/23 05:18 PM
6

What's that? Feminists project? Weird...never seen that before.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 05:35 PM
23

Saying "not all men" is a spineless, weak, utterly groveling response. "You're a sexist bigot, you disgust me.." is a more appropriate and frankly accurate response. Stop being weak. Stop validating their bigotry. Attack them with even more vigor than they would attack you for saying the reverse. "Not All men" is about as effective as saying "no I'm not" when someone calls you a loser. It's a non argument that explicitly let's them off the hook for their statement. Once again...weak.
/r/MensRights30/06/23 08:36 PM
0

They are followers of Asteroth, and Baal. IOW evil. They lie constantly, know they are lying, and don't care because lying is required for acceptance in the general culture. They call evil good, and good, evil. Consistently. Take that as a sign, or not. Your choice. Myself? I believe we are living through the Book of Revelation. Smirk if you like, but every detail of modern society fits the Biblical description like a glove. Some will pay attention. Most will scoff and refuse to investigate. Bot…
/r/MensRights30/06/23 08:31 PM
1

No. Woke policies caused incompetent people to be in charge of design, and piloting, rather than "old white men". Darwin took care of the rest.
/r/MensRights24/06/23 02:40 PM
1

Infant, you are inconsequential. Guys like me change the world. Guys like you do thier best to halt that change. You are an anachronism. I am the future. Sucks to be irrelevant hey?
/r/MensRights24/06/23 06:20 AM
2

No. It was politically correct woke policy that killed these people. Admit it and move on, Marxist shill
/r/MensRights24/06/23 06:16 AM
1

Strike a nerve did I? Yes, I am saying that in comparison to the partial list I gave, your Leftist Talking Points had next to zero effect on family breakdown. And pure logic should show you as much. For example, on welfare "reform": Benefits increased to a "living wage" but only if the father is not in the home. You might argue welfare increases were humanitarian, thus net benefit. But requiring the father to be out of the home plus more money from government than daddy if he's gone, equals fami…
/r/MensRights24/06/23 12:22 AM
1

I'll just leave this (relevant link) here: https://youtu.be/yklZTfPTSlE
/r/MensRights24/06/23 12:07 AM
1

Over your head I see. I'll try again.. Your citations are pointless, since those issues have next to nothing to do with family breakdown. They certainly pale in comparison to things like No Fault Divorce. You have no understanding of either the issues at hand, or their cause...and worse, you call historical fact a "conspiracy theory"...indicating you are an NPC. Which is about the level of discourse you offer, so it makes sense.
/r/MensRights23/06/23 11:25 PM
1

Marxists, not Capitalists, are responsible for family breakdown. It was a stated goal for decades. Leftists brought In welfare reform(kick dad out), the New Deal (get back on the plantation poor people), no fault divorce, title 9, title 4d, Vawa, and domestic violence laws that criminalize being a male in a disagreement. I read your screed. You have no idea what you are talking about. But you sure hate conservatives. And that's all that seems to matter. How you think your "argument" is too nuanc…
/r/MensRights23/06/23 11:02 PM
1

The Left? Absolutely. But not ONLY the Left. For example, check out the anti-Tate sentiment here, then see who mentions he is accused, not convicted...yet still condemn him using woke language. Many of them are not Left wing. But they're still virtue signaling dweebs. So you'll pardon me if I'm not so reductionist as you.
/r/MensRights23/06/23 10:56 PM
2

I guess you don't read news sources beyond the headlines. The Uninspiring thing is a direct quote. The diversity hire thing actual company policy. But you don't need to know that stuff to virtue signal I suppose. But, next time, research something before you call other people stupid for having a different perspective.
/r/MensRights23/06/23 10:53 PM
6

Maybe women should take note, and pursue those careers then. Or...are you suggesting that mistreatment is inconsequential if boys still manage to succeed in some way? Because that would be rather feminist of you...
/r/MensRights23/06/23 05:19 PM
0

Marxist feminists (self described as such) openly declared the goal of feminism was to "deconstruct society through the destruction of the nuclear family" until the beginning of the 90s. The phrase actually came from Communist Russia...as did the term "politically correct". You are not only dead wrong in your interpretation of history, you are also an obvious Leftist Zealot.
/r/MensRights23/06/23 04:32 PM
15

It's not rich=evil, it's woke=evil. Most of the crowing I have seen is bringing up the "white men are uninspiring" stuff. The fact that the design team and pilots were essentially "diversity hires" is what people are drawing attention to, even outright mocking. Also, the thing had never been tested...and people got in it. That is extremely stupid. Basically, the world is better off without this woke CEO, and maybe now, at the cost of human lives, people might think twice before pulling a similar…
/r/MensRights23/06/23 04:27 PM
0

So...you're a Communist then. Gotcha.
/r/MensRights20/06/23 11:56 PM
1

Mistakes like that ensure failure. Meme...or memetic illustrations, when done correctly, communicate extremely complex ideas in few, if any, words. Politics is DOWNSTREAM from culture...change culture, change politics. But, leftists can't meme...so maybe you have a point...
/r/MensRights20/06/23 10:51 PM
1

This sub had 210000 subscribers about 10 years ago...bigger than 2xC. 2xC allowed people to post, and didn't heavily "self police" themselves out of existence. This sub SHOULD be orders of magnitude larger...but the woke Leftards running this sub keep censoring anything that even slightly deviates from the Progressive narrative, thus driving away about 90% of men. This sub is much, MUCH worse than it used to be, even more woke than Bud Light, and a political monoculture. That is all 100% the fau…
/r/MensRights20/06/23 10:46 PM
1

Well, in the conversations I had with Ms Pizzey, the feminists that attacked her were not only Marxists, they were straight up communists. That's from her. The actual person. Not some Wikipedia article. So...yeah, Leftists are, and always have been, the enemy of men, and the women who love them.
/r/MensRights16/06/23 10:48 PM
2

Whiner.
/r/MensRights16/06/23 04:52 PM
1

Hey! +1 for actually having integrity.
/r/MensRights15/06/23 11:11 PM
1

Quick to condemn men you don't like...kinda Progressive of you. He hasn't even been charged with a crime. In fact, he was imprisoned for weeks on accusation alone. But apparently that's just fine, if you don't like the guy. Tell me again why anyone should care what happens to you? I mean, what if we don't like you? Can we dismiss you as a guilty creep, without knowing anything but that you are unpopular? What is the point of this subreddit, when tons of you throw politically unpopular men under …
/r/MensRights15/06/23 11:10 PM
2

The most Google man on the planet isn't very well known? Your jealousy is showing.
/r/MensRights06/06/23 10:32 PM
3

Key word: ACCUSED. No conviction. No charges even. No evidence that can be verified in any way. Sort of a nightmare scenario of anti male injustice, incarceration a man for 3 months for having unpopular views - caring about men and boys. Worse, he's actually effective. But, the "Mens Rights Activists" on this hard Left board are fine with all that...even piling on without a stitch of example to back up their opinion. Leaping to condemn for fear of "LOOKING bad".....what a group of ineffective dw…
/r/MensRights06/06/23 10:30 PM
2

Kinda SIMPle thinking you got there buddy.
/r/MensRights25/05/23 11:07 PM
3

Apparently, you weren't alive in the 70s. Feminism was Marxist in the 1960s at the very latest, likely considerably earlier than that. Don't believe me? Ask Erin pizzey if feminists were Marxists when she opened her shelter...
/r/MensRights25/05/23 11:05 PM
2

Feminism has always had the destruction of family as a central tenet. Feminism has never, not even once, truly concerned itself with mens issues, thus eviscerated the falsehood that Feminism is "about equality". It is now, and always has been, an anti male hate movement.
/r/MensRights25/05/23 11:01 PM
11

The sentencing disparity between men and women is nine times the sentencing disparity between black and white.
/r/MensRights17/05/23 08:41 PM
0

The MRM is most certainly NOT "about equality". That's just the direction the woke socialists running this sub want it to go. The MRM has been, since its inception "about" REPRESENTING MENS INTERESTS. "Equality" doesn't factor in. Unless you're a woketard scared of "looking bad" I suppose.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 11:25 PM
6

This is not a mens rights issue. This is a woke left issue. Personally, I don't give fuck one about Trans anything. Activism wise, this is just yet another attempt at Progressive entryism. Again, NOT a mens issue. Trans or otherwise.
/r/MensRights03/05/23 10:47 PM
2

Prior to 1950, the suicide rate of men was 1.2x that of women. It was like that for(as far as we know) recorded human history, until the introduction of no fault divorce in the 70s. Coincidence? Maybe.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 05:50 PM
0

The author of this article has been "involved " since 1991, promoted guys like Rollo when he was unknown, and knows more about this movement than nearly anyone else. Red Pill has the EXACT same meaning as in the Matrix...a nugget of truth that wakes you up to the lies. It always has, regardless of PUA attempts to claim the phrase. BTW, the first "community" to use the term were Conspiracy Theorists. Game is the Red Pill was published in April of 2009, which led to a manosphere wide debate where …
/r/MensRights20/04/23 05:46 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter