TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Tirnor Archive

View 0 posts and 40 comments by Tirnor on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Option 1 - It's bad. The audience can't handle a strong, free woman. Option 2 - It's good. See, the Patriarchy was holding her back.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 06:30 PM
2

"In some schemes..." Unintentional honesty?
/r/MensRights13/07/17 03:49 PM
2

Not surprised. IMO Nothing wrong with preferring paper to the real McCoy sometimes, but if you are looking to replicate that generally still requires a real partner.
/r/MensRights27/12/16 08:21 PM
2

Damnit, Oddball.
/r/MensRights17/11/16 08:28 PM
2

Actually, yes. One of my favorite history-related books is The Cursades Through Arab Eyes which has had some rather anti-West summaries written about it in the past, but upon reading it, you find that those were most likely written by people trying to force their own biases onto it. So, while going by a summary might be good enough for deciding to read it or not for personal reasons, I really don't think it is good enough for judging, voting, or the like. (For the record, I'd really have no inte…
/r/MensRights03/11/16 04:19 PM
2

This would be a perfect way to trick me into littering. *read* *rip* *drop*
/r/MensRights14/10/16 02:25 PM
3

"I stand before you not as a candidate of Black America, although I am very proud to be Black. I stand before you not as a candidate of the women’s movement in the United States, though I am equally proud to be a woman. I stand before you as a candidate of the people of America.” is a quote from the article attributed to Shirley Chisolm. I don't know about the rest of her platform, but if this was a consistent message, I'd have voted for her. The ability to acknowledge aspects of your identity b…
/r/MensRights04/08/16 01:41 PM
1

You have known your mate all your life. You know he's exactly the kind of guy that will punch someone in the face, if he thinks someone is giving him (or you) the eye. You do something dumb, like spill a beer on his favorite jersey and say, "Man, it was this guy giving me the eye that distracted me," as you drag you friend over to said stranger. Where did you, as a reasonable person with great knowledge of the personal dynamics here, think this was going to go? I'm not keen on anything like sayi…
/r/MensRights09/03/16 04:01 PM
3

To quote you from elsewhere: "Officially or not, their effect is majorly hateful."
/r/MensRights08/06/15 02:41 PM
0

52 over 15 years... compared to 30 over 2 months? A shame that she's going to get probation or a suspended sentence compared to the 30-60 years that he received.. that is if this even gets to a sentencing phase. (And yes, that's my prediction. Now, how do I mark this so I can easily check it later?)
/r/MensRights22/10/14 02:41 PM
1

This interviewer has a real hard-on for the phrase "large scale harassment of women". Is there a name for the type of question that sets a frame where you just can't win? i.e. "When did you stop beating your wife?" For the last three questions it's like the interviewer just is baiting him for a quote that they can put in a headline: "Gamergate's large scale harassment of women is ok, because X, says Zoe's slanderer!" ..which now that I look, is pretty darn close to what they did.
/r/MensRights17/10/14 09:55 PM
2

"Today, twenty years later, it seems absurd that Kyle Rayner's girlfriend was chopped up and stuck in a refrigerator. That will never be allowed to happen again, and Gail Simmone made that change happen. " Now, I'm not exactly keen on this. It sits a bit close to the "women aren't allowed to be hurt" line. I've read quite a few comics where horrible (dismembering and such) death happens to men as part of the story and no one blinks. And Lo and Behold - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_in_Refri…
/r/MensRights14/10/14 09:42 PM
1

Progressivism 57.5 Socialism 12.5 Tenderness 40.625 Your test scores indicate that you are an open-minded cultural centrist; this is the political profile one might associate with a jaded materialist. It appears that you are tolerant towards religion, and have a pragmatic attitude towards humanity in general. Your attitudes towards economics appear laissez-faire capitalist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as a libertari…
/r/MensRights02/10/14 03:14 PM
1

"They asked me how well I understood theoretical physics. I said I had a theoretical degree in physics. They said welcome aboard." - Fantastic
/r/MensRights18/09/14 07:58 PM
1

"I've seen some "blue-sky thinking" on that task force, with "un-wiki" ideas such as requiring consensus of 2 editors to revert a female editor." Female editor gets reverted by one male = He's a misogynist! Female editor gets reverted by two or more males in agreement = Evidence of systematic oppression! ...just not going to be able to win this, folks.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 06:33 PM
1

I wouldn't have used those words, but I have to agree. Not sure what is so surprising about how, in the long run, the members of group A that are willing to be more accepting of and appeasing to group B are more tolerated by group B.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 04:54 PM
4

I have questions from looking at the numbers provided: "Ending Veteran Homelessness: President Obama will announce that the number of veterans who suffer from homelessness has dropped by a third over the past four years as nearly 25,000 veterans have moved into housing." So.. 25k is 1/3 of roughly 75k, yes? So there were 75000 homeless vets at the time of that measurement. and then: "There are over 4,000 homeless women veterans in our country today. These women veterans struggle to find employme…
/r/MensRights28/08/14 04:50 PM
1

"Gay for political reasons" reminds me of "dead for tax reasons" from Restaurant at the End of the Universe. Sounds like a plan. I like it.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 08:21 PM
3

“There is a pervasive attitude that the female graduate student in question must now prove to the faculty that she is capable of completing her degree, even when prior to the pregnancy there were absolutely no doubts about her capabilities and ambition.” Well, yeah. If I had someone working on a long term project that took years of their and my effort who decided to take a turn in to greatly expanding another aspect of their daily life (Remember, only 24 hours in a day), be it work or home relat…
/r/MensRights18/06/13 02:22 AM
3

I disagree with the article as far as - But since a true threat has to be directed at another person (or against a group of people), Lanker-Simons's alleged "threat" against herself cannot be a true threat and thus qualifies as free speech. The threat was not directed at herself. The threat post was only half the statement or "conduct". The other half was her implication of who the guilty and responsible parties were. By focusing on just the one message, not the whole incident, you miss actual t…
/r/MensRights03/05/13 06:39 PM
1

Wait... the one that is a reference to Apocalypse Now is OK, but "Hey Babe!" is a huge deal? Now if this guy is going to sit down and explain where those words come from in addition to "Hey Babe", I'd like to see that. It really does seem like someone is selectively focusing on their own little bailiwick and trying REALLY hard to find new things to complain about.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 06:26 AM
1

If it wasn't for this part she is going to need a lot of help raising that child I say that he didn't need to know. (Though I agree with him having a right to know just for general purposes) But since you make it sound like there might be more than a small possibility that she might seek help from governmental programs to raise this kid, and that many states seem to like to track down possible/likely/"guys who were in the town at the time" fathers and start billing them, he might be on the hook …
/r/MensRights01/05/13 06:24 AM
13

The fact that the Facebook post apparently was a fabrication does not change the necessity for continued vigilance in assuring that we have a campus where everyone feels safe This is the important part. The fact that someone LIED should have no bearing on the actual situation they themselves created because of how someone "feels". I'm going to invest in "MRA-approved" desks and gloves for all the additional /headdesk and /facepalm that reading this sub seems to cause me.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 12:02 AM
4

Wait. This will never work! We can't say "What the oppression?" WTO is already taken as an acronym.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 11:00 PM
22

"The defense will try to prove that Alexander was obsessed with looking at sexual content on his computer." To counter that, I suggest this interruption of that line of questioning: "Your honor, in the interest of brevity, the State is willing to stipulate that the victim was human."
/r/MensRights05/02/13 08:33 PM
10

That's some heavy projecting there. Switch the genders and change "feminist" to "minority" or "African-American" and you'd pretty much have a nice slice of something approximate to history.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 09:02 PM
11

"...what the courts need - the law taking more heed of any hurt and emotions involved." Isn't this what these folks have been saying all along? Their emotions trump our facts?
/r/MensRights27/12/12 09:31 PM
0

I personally never cared what color it was. The important part was that you could make cake and cookies in it. Unless they made the "Easy-Bacon" Oven, that was enough for me.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 08:56 PM
3

"she has 'some bruising' on her arms and wrist" 'some bruising' has to be the new 'your taillight was out/dim' or 'our dog got a reaction'. Just enough of something for them to say they have some justification to drag you in, but mysteriously gone in a few hours or days when anyone with your interests at heart is actually allowed to check.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 08:02 PM
8

I suggest the long overdue invention of the "Your Dad" joke. "Your DAD is a slow delivery man!" holds up the hand for a high five Perhaps that will get them thinking that the man they are being sexist about could very well be some woman's father.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 06:05 PM
31

Victim Blaming! Instead of telling the poor, overworked judicial system to stop imprisoning women, tell women not to commit crimes. They way the article tells it, the innocent system was just asking for it... walking down the street in its long black robes.. just wanting to have a fair and impartial time with it's cases. (Here's where I cross my finger and hope I don't have to explain or defend this obvious joke.) *edit for obviously misused pronoun suffix
/r/MensRights23/10/12 03:00 PM
3

"... I need to stop my fish from bike riding."?
/r/MensRights21/09/12 12:49 AM
6

"Just because someone says they’re not ready for a particular role, don’t accept it." - Fiona Macfarlane, chief inclusiveness officer So... a "no" doesn't mean no? I'd love to cross reference this woman's ideas with the new university rules that make "nagging" for sex the basis for rape. Love that wonderfully made-up title, by the way.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 07:46 PM
3

"People like this, won't shut up, they have all the means and weapons to harm destiny due to previous behavior and with it, our organization if he was to remain in it. I am not sure if that makes any sense but put simply, if we get a sponsor tomorrow, they'll get a bunch of mails tomorrow saying "they support a racist, a pedophile, inmoral, swearing blablablabla" and all sorts of shit that we know are not true.." - ROOTCatZ This pretty much says it all. And somehow I don't think you'll find a ma…
/r/MensRights30/08/12 05:44 PM
1

"Turning the training ground for America’s political and cultural elite into an intellectual joke." Sounds like someone is mad that the unwashed masses are using their "right" to higher education(and free money for it) and drawing dirty pictures on their ivory tower when they get there.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 05:46 PM
6

From the additional comments made by the blogger: "Men don’t think twice about where they sit on the bus based on the possibility that they might get sexually harassed or assaulted. That isn’t a generalization." So, saying something is true about a whole set based on the majority of members (vast majority or not) isn't a generalization? Actually, isn't that the EXACT DEFINITION a generalization? Like something you would use an example of one if explaining it to someone that didn't know what one …
/r/MensRights21/08/12 04:24 PM
7

"You know that weird adult cousin of yours who’s always out in the yard with the kids, never in the kitchen drinking with the grown-ups? Keep an eye on your kids when he’s around." You know I generally hate kids, but I hate parents more. So no, you will never find me in the kitchen getting drunk (don't drink anyway) with the "adults", commiserating about some bullshit thing that ditz-one said to ditz-two at work and how it was so bad we just had to self-medicate with a nice bottle of ol' janx sp…
/r/MensRights16/08/12 08:12 PM
6

I'm not actually against this panel happening at all. They can have panels on anything and everything. I just hate the part that I know will happen afterward: Where it gets referenced, quoted, and thrown in among footnotes as a "proof" that reddit is all those horrible things in articles written on their own sites and other similar ones.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 11:56 PM
1

"..so I called him a mother-fucker...which...which...is...linguistically correct, because I'm a mother and he....used to..." - Wildcats (1986)
/r/MensRights09/08/12 03:02 AM
3

"After taking a sexuality class last semester.." Out of curiosity, has anyone ever heard something "good" follow that phrase?
/r/MensRights02/07/12 06:13 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter