TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TitanicPat Archive

View 2 posts and 667 comments by TitanicPat on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
67

FeminismTitanicPat/r/MensRights30/06/22 10:52 AM
26

GeneralTitanicPat/r/MensRights28/06/22 09:04 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Well, at least you've made progress. No longer arguing similarity, now you're attempting to justify privileges. Even if it is with boring predictably hypocritical pro-life "Practice Abstinence" arguments - for one gender only, of course. If you're being consistent, is it really feminism? The "Responsibility for all" side, has a respectable position. The "free choices for all" side, also has a respectable position. Hold one of those.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 08:05 AM
5

I used to be amazed that feminists could be wrong. Now, I'm amazed feminists face no requirement to be correct.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 01:39 PM
2

The right to choose will be codified into law after the Dem skidmark at the midterms is averted.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 05:43 PM
1

You're referring back to your circular logic fallacy as if it still has merit. We have established Women can separate the consents men cannot. It's not about using the miranda rights "as often" it's about being given them at all.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 05:34 PM
1

No consent to parenthood is required before the mother separates the consents Consent to parenthood is assumed on the part of the father BEFORE your carefully chosen organ donor scenario. As we have robustly established. It's like only giving miranda rights to one demographic and withholding them from another.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 04:07 PM
1

Couldn't think of any examples, huh? That's because feminism is a gender supremacist philosophy. Where all that separates stories of accolade worthy stunning and brave successes and worrying influences of patriarchy is the gender of the people being successful. A poorly justified pattern by liberal and incorrect use of the term DEFAULT.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 06:39 AM
1

Ok, let's take another trip around your circular logic fallacy to refresh your memory. You try to claim men can make the same (or analogous) choices that women can, by putting on lavish dog an pony shows of male agency. But if we dig beneath your provided context, we find they're built on the bones of trampled bodily autonomy and assumed consents. Withholding a vagina is separation of The Consents Withholding a kidney is not, because the scenario intrinically PRESUMES all sorts of consents. You …
/r/MensRights04/07/22 08:23 PM
2

In all your responses, THIS is the first time you've abandoned the original framework. No longer trying to argue similarity, now you're trying to justify difference. You've been rumbled and you know it. Now you're desperately trying to resuscitate it externally by throwing other frameworks up. Projecting your "equity" and "equality of outcome" philosophy onto others. I want the freedom of Opportunity to separate the consents, just like women have. You are logically mistaken, morally bankrupt and…
/r/MensRights04/07/22 05:21 AM
2

You are motivated to conflate consent to sex with consent to parenthood [henceforth referred to as "The Consents"] . For men only. and PRETEND that women face this. To con people into accepting inequality. Doing this maintains your access to men's bodies and the resources they produce. The Pregnancy/Organ donation scenario achieves 2 very important goals simultaneously. It frames men as having the "same" ability women do AND pretends The Consents are conflated for women also. It's emotionally ev…
/r/MensRights03/07/22 07:04 AM
1

Ok, in case you didn't get it - Consent to Sex IS NOT consent to parenthood. THAT is not a CLAIM, it is the state of MY consent, YOU are now informed of it. This is NOT an opportunity for you to play creepy coercive word games. It IS NOT an invitation for you to debate MY CONSENT. You get to LISTEN and you get to RESPECT that. We all know Entitled Hypocrisy is the defining characteristic of Feminism, and honestly, we all have a good laugh about it. Watching you Predictably become hard line Pro L…
/r/MensRights02/07/22 07:28 AM
18

Backed up both anecdotally, with many videos of many specific instances AND with data about sentencing disparities. As observations of the world go, you could do a lot worse. All I can say is, at any MRA gathering, EVERYONE should be recording EVERYTHING. And even THAT isn't much, but it's something.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 12:41 PM
1

Not an argument. Also, heavy 1940s devout Catholic vibes.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 12:00 PM
1

An example of a disparity where Women come out ahead, where feminism recognize some unfair advantage and wishes to correct it. or an example of a disparity where men come out ahead where feminism does not see it as an issue that needs challenging. In your own time.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 11:57 AM
1

Consensual sex is an example of a person WILLINGLY donating of semen. False analogy, Sex often is exclusively recreational. The rest of your argument is gone. It's funny watching hardline feminists like you talk like devout Catholics from the 1940s
/r/MensRights01/07/22 11:22 AM
1

Being as specific as possible, women have the privilege of distinguishing consent to sex from consent to parenthood. Women who do not consent to parenthood can terminate, put child up for adoption, or use safe haven laws. Importantly, Her decision is hers alone. But men who do not consent to parenthood, get to cross their fingers that the birth control methods worked. If they didn't, then exclusive and unilateral decisions over his life, his responsibilities, his Bodily Autonomy, if you will, wi…
/r/MensRights01/07/22 11:03 AM
1

Broadly speaking, we get 2 kinds of trolls on this sub. Type A - "What have MRAs Actually Achieved? You're so ineffectual and pathetic." Type B - "You and your Shadow Council of co-conspirators are responsible for EVERYTHING!!!! REEEEEEE!!!" I find the flip-flopping highly entertaining.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 10:21 AM
1

in all cases the interests of the children shall be paramount; That's the loophole for enabling discrimination against men. Women exercising their privilege of distinguishing consent to sex from consent to parenthood with abortion means no child exists and therefore no interests to consider. With other options to distinguish, Safe haven laws or adoption, the child's interests are... "met" But men seeking the same bodily autonomy - Sorry bro, "best interests of the childtm" Legal paternal surrend…
/r/MensRights01/07/22 10:09 AM
1

Visibility.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 09:46 AM
1

Consent to sex is not consent to parenthood. Conflating the two is a mistake. Conflating the two for men, while women have a multitude of rights to distinguish between them is discrimination.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 09:29 AM
1

It's Entitlement and Justification being so overpowering, that they are blind to any hypocrisy in their arguments to secure what it is they want right this second. Tomorrow, they'll be Fully Justified in their Entitlement to something else, and we'll see a fresh set of inane, entirely disposable, 1st draft arguments.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 09:19 AM
1

THIS is where feminism's TRUE strength lies. This is why their views are so heavily entrenched and are so far reaching. This is why their influence is so prevalent. Because being wrong, doesn't actually matter, when you're a feminist.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 09:03 AM
4

Southern Poverty Law Centre in their attitudes towards women. Westboro Baptist Church, towards men.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 07:35 AM
11

"Please proceed to the drive thru window"
/r/MensRights01/07/22 06:40 AM
6

It makes me wonder that even if men magically achieved a legal set of reproductive rights, we'd see all sorts of tricks and selective rulings to make them functionally unusable. Outside of the legality, men would also be societally stigmatised into the dirt for even attempting to exercise these rights. All the while, men would be told, these laws technically EXIST so what are they complaining about.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 06:39 AM
5

Innocent men have fewer avenues to establish their Innocence. But gotta pursue those rape convictions like they're sales targets though, right?
/r/MensRights01/07/22 06:29 AM
10

In the absence of any other real evidence, shouldn't 4 months of her aggressive sexting, with time stamps leading up to the hour of the alleged crime even be considered?
/r/MensRights01/07/22 06:18 AM
6

Yes, I see this a lot where you might lay out your argument and the problem with the given system. The troll cannot escape the point being made and responds with "I don't understand" hoping you will give them an oversimplified version, which they will then attack. Deeply dishonest stuff.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 03:21 PM
1

I have made this observation before on the wage gap, but since we seem to have so many esteemed guests joining the sub this week. I shall repeat it. While dozens of different approaches and methodologies fail to produce quantifiable evidence of unfairness, recount after recount. While the slogans on the long debunked wage gap, remain exactly the same despite losing every major debate, on the subject for over a decade (Privilege is facing no requirement to be correct.) I have a simple question ab…
/r/MensRights30/06/22 01:29 PM
3

This is a deeply supremacist attitude within feminism. Men coming out ahead, whatever the disparity being discussed, is seen as inherently suspicious. It is somehow IT'S OWN evidence that something is amiss. But never when women come out ahead at any disparity. In other threads I post "Whatever the disparity, if men ain't 2nd, they're cheating!" and attribute it to feminism. Perhaps I shouldn't be so glib because seriously, feminism gets into dangerous rather disturbing territory here.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 11:39 AM
4

Yikes, that is the rhetoric of somebody who never has to prove a word of what they claim.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 11:26 AM
6

If it was sexist discrimination when feminists are pearl clutching, then it's still sexist discrimination, when those selectively outraged, self serving frauds go suspiciously silent.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 11:17 AM
22

"Whatever the disparity, If men ain't 2nd, they're cheating!" - feminists What a bunch of supremacists.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 08:10 AM
21

I found the complete series of Transformers from the 1980s on amazon on DVD. It might be worth looking to older content for boys, while there is such an open disdain for them from contemporary creators.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 08:06 AM
1

Ironic you should bring up Texas, the state where safe haven laws BEGAN.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 07:54 AM
3

Wow, so much money, so many people forced into financial responsibility that they were denied the right to consent to. And since you "don't" see men as providers, you won't mind them attaining equal rights with women. I'm so glad you agree. All those feminists who want to challenge dated gender norms and smash toxic expectations of masculinity, where have they gone? They seem to have suddenly dropped off the face of the earth. If you see any of them, do send my regards, I hope they're okay.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 07:14 AM
6

Let me just check feminism's track record of apathy... ...And no. Nobody owes you engagement on the issues you have worked tirelessly to ignore, downplay and dismiss. And your dumb feminist strawman questions certainly aren't helping your case. Go make your Protected Class noises elsewhere.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 06:59 AM
7

You don't have an opinion on these issues, you've got too many carefully maintained gaps in your knowledge. No more comparative statements from you about mechanisms for which you have no idea how to value.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 06:04 AM
50

Can I just add this question here. Is anybody else tired of feminists not giving a crap about work place fatality disparity, not giving a crap about men working longer hours, not giving a crap about men retiring later, not giving a crap about men spending less money than women, not giving a crap about men being the net contributors to public spending... AND THEN Talking about child support payments like men can simply pluck them out of thin air? What TF would they know?? I gotta say, I'm kinda o…
/r/MensRights30/06/22 12:43 AM
3

OP asked a question and I'm just answering it. Your unwillingness to accept the explanation and claiming the rudimentary functionality of cancel culture is some how "a conspiracy theory" is entirely irrelevant to this conversation.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 12:35 AM
11

Is that how you see men? As just a wallet? This might come as a shock, but we're not your provider serfs. We actually have our own minds, our own interests. We can feel ambition, pain and fatigue. Until you can understand that men are people too, you really have no place arguing against people's right to separate consent to sex from consent to parenthood, just like women can.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 08:46 PM
4

Songs will be sang if this day.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 08:35 PM
8

The presence of misoginists is not WHY the mrm is labeled as misogynistic. We MUST be labeled as evil in any way possible, as those who stand to lose influence fear that an audience might listen, not just to the inequalities being discussed, but the glaring flaws in feminism as well.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 08:30 PM
121

That's the special kind of patriarchy we live in. Where advocating for the fair treatment of men is widely stigmatised and feminism never has to put any actual leg work into their lie about wanting equality.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 08:10 PM
1

I wonder if a particular failing of the UK is a vulnerability to the victim card. As I said with parties being afraid of standing up to feminists. They hear the victim card on a subject, they immediately buckle and start grovelling.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 07:55 PM
6

Accountability for anyone failing to agree with feminism at the very first opportunity. Accountability for feminists, overtly breaking clearly defined rules, ONLY when inaction becomes embarrassing to the platform.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 02:33 PM
13

Women can do it. (Safe harbor laws) Why can't men? Shame, you didn't check your privilege before opening your mouth, now you just look dumb.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 02:29 PM
9

Or even child support is paid with actual goods/services purchased. The party paying child support gets a shopping list. items are purchased from that list up to the cost of child support, then delivered to the party receiving CS. AFTER both parties had the clear right to separate consent to sex from consent to parenthood, of course.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 02:27 PM
16

Well, she can make whatever stunning and brave decisions she likes. Denying men the same agency because you only view men as a class of provider serfs is not an argument. Can I expect you to do better any time soon, or is this it?
/r/MensRights29/06/22 02:22 PM
6

I'm from UK, Similar voting choice here. This is an oversimplification, perhaps, but the conservatives don't care about men's rights. But this makes them the lesser evil, as Labour is filled with activists and feminists who HATE men. Openly and happily. The other big problem in the UK at least, (not sure if this is the case in the US) is 60% of the parties proudly and actively Push radical, unproven, anti male feminism and the rest are Afraid of standing up to feminism. So it's all pretty hopele…
/r/MensRights29/06/22 02:11 PM
1

Yep, women only of course. Take your new baby, to designated safe surrender sites (police stations, emergency rooms, fire stations, churches)and give them up. No questions asked, don't need to give your identity. The time limit differs but all 50 states have some form of this law on the books. This is another way women (and ONLY women) can separate consent to sex from consent to parenthood.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 12:34 PM
1

The "We only want equality" lie is finding less and less shade to hide in.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 11:46 AM
45

Johnson waving feminist mechanisms around, and looking like a moron, without a care in the world, is really bad news for feminism. I want to make sure his microphone is working when he talks about the patriarchy and toxic masculinity. Edit: Also while feminists cry fake tears over the number of men in power, just remember how many of those men spew man hating, divisive feminist rhetoric.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 11:42 AM
2

Losing the debates should mean something. This is twice you have asked what reproductive rights men don't have, and this is TWICE you've been schooled on the topic. People engaged with you in good faith. Either u/EmirikolWoker's efforts were wasted or you can tell us- How this new information has changed your mind? What new insight has this given you? Do you now understand why the ability to separate consent to sex from consent to parenthood should be a right for everyone and not just one privil…
/r/MensRights29/06/22 11:21 AM
2

Up until 2 weeks ago, feminists were telling us, all women are unstoppable paragons of stunning and brave capability, able to do anything a man can and get paid exactly the same. The only thing holding back these women was men! Today, they're suddenly waving the banners for dated gender norms and need a class of Provider Serfs and every argument boils down to "because vagina..."
/r/MensRights29/06/22 11:03 AM
1

And, newsflash, how exactly do they intend to make child abandonment legal for men but not for women? This Just In! - That already IS legal for women, they're called safe haven laws... More at 11. Maybe these brainiacs should familiarize themselves with their plethora of reproductive rights, before busting out the Handmaids Tale outfits?
/r/MensRights29/06/22 10:43 AM
7

On the "K*ll all M*n" clown show that is Twitter, Heal Vs Babyface was terminated for quoting Game of Thrones with "All men must die" in response to Marvel's super feminist redesign of She Hulk. This is just feminists who claim to have no power, abusing their power over you. Something that only happens on days ending in 'Y'
/r/MensRights29/06/22 10:00 AM
5

We already have that. its called r/MensRights Feminists can visit as they please. They can talk about their views freely and engage in good faith debate, for as long as they want to before bailing, without fear of being banned.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 08:32 AM
8

I think the 1st thing we would see, because it's easy AND because of the benefit to themselves- The internet platforms and monopolies would suddenly be emboldened to ban and censor ANY and ALL dissent with TOTAL impunity. The current situation of pretending that there are rules and the pretense that they are applied fairly, to the best ability of the platform, would well and truly be over. Talk of parity in DV, male victims of rape, the lack of reproductive rights, would all just be shut down, n…
/r/MensRights29/06/22 08:23 AM
2

Even taking her word for it- we can clearly see Anti male, pro feminist "Organized enforcement" from feminist academia all over the country, at every level of the entertainment industry and even the policy and law makers at the national and international level. But I'm sure she would have a mental gymnastics set to hand waive all that inconvenience.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 08:05 AM
4

Through indoctrination, they have genuinely internalized the belief that irrational hatred of a demographic - the foundational basis of discrimination and bigotry - is okay when they do it. No ideology can get to such a place with robust philosophy, good faith world views and stringent academic standards. Gynocentrism and the "women are wonderful" effect have lowered the standards faced by feminism to effectively zero. A Religion has taken root in colleges and universities that never 2nd drafts …
/r/MensRights29/06/22 07:57 AM
13

Meanwhile, on Earth, 80% of men don't meet the standards set by 80% of women.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 07:39 AM
2

Then you should ignore their attempt to shift the goal posts from bodily autonomy to aesthetics.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 06:00 AM
2

Yeah, she heard from co workers about what happened, but if things escalate to HR then details will become more guarded. She tells me she will keep an ear out though.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 05:48 AM
3

Feminists don't want to hear what men think. They want to hear what Feminists think - in a deeper voice.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 03:28 PM
30

"They might wish to harm me" is.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 03:14 PM
1

ANY responsibilities or privileges affiliated with parenthood would not be applied to persons who did not consent to becoming parents - As it currently is for women.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 03:12 PM
2

Giving money to care for a child will never be *cared about as much* as carrying and giving birth to said child. Fixed. I know men are supposed to be society's silent provider serfs, but let's pretend they're human beings, shall we? With feelings and dreams and ambitions, who feel pain and fatigue, the whole nine yards. it's 18 years of inflexible wage garnishing under the threat of jail, at the unilateral and exclusive proclamation of the woman, for no other reason than gender. It's Indentured …
/r/MensRights28/06/22 02:52 PM
4

But only for one of the parties. A discrimination based on gender
/r/MensRights28/06/22 02:34 PM
35

Social Courtesy, AFTER unfairly stereotyping them in the first place?
/r/MensRights28/06/22 02:31 PM
4

Oh, I understand now. That's a poor argument to maintain gender based discrimination. Do you have any better reasons?
/r/MensRights28/06/22 02:20 PM
10

so... Men shouldn't be able to separate consent to sex from consent to parenthood, like women can? I don't understand your logic.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 11:28 AM
8

Unilateral decisions over the responsibilities of other, supposedly autonomous human beings ISN'T a reproductive rights issue? Feminists seem to think it is.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 11:22 AM
4

Sometimes Feminists believe in 100+ genders, sometimes they only believe in 1.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 08:10 AM
5

How do you (And whoever it is you work for) want to discuss men's ability to separate consent to sex from consent to parenthood, the way women, currently can? Or is that not what you are here for?
/r/MensRights28/06/22 07:59 AM
6

So let's shine a light on this horrible crime, bring the perpetrators to justice and make changes to the system to end this terrible ability to Weaponize the State whenever criminals want. Let's NOT give the terrorists whatever they want, in the hopes they will commit fewer crimes.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 07:47 AM
8

This is transparent manipulation. The media doesn't suddenly care about men. They just want society's provider serfs to show up for the midterms.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 07:00 AM
3

Or at all.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 06:37 AM
18

Ukraine war - "women most affected." Depp verdict - "Real Victims will find it harder to come forward" Roe overturned "let's carefully consider MALE VOTERS" ???? This is such crap!
/r/MensRights28/06/22 06:16 AM
3

All the activist subgroups have done, is attend big feminist marches and events.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 05:30 PM
11

I wish to make it clear at the top, I am a laymen and I'm just "thinking out loud" I wonder if the feminist experiment within college was to create and organize sets of activists to exist under each "identity" group - feminists, BLM, Trans rights activists etc So that they could all join forces and wash over the evil white man's patriarchy and usher in their Utopia. Are we seeing this experiment collapse? and this possible turning point is a result of that collapse. These energized activist grou…
/r/MensRights27/06/22 03:13 PM
7

Hey, men... Want to narrow the education gap AND add to the pay gap? [Looks shiftily in both directions] Vote for stuff we want and we can make it happen! I'm surprised the research didn't find a reduction in false rape accusations in colleges and sharp increases in finding crisp $50s down the sides of sofas.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 02:10 PM
1

See, your mistake there, was giving a shit about the names SJWs call you.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 01:52 PM
3

You know abortions haven't been banned, right?
/r/MensRights27/06/22 01:38 PM
2

I'm talking about the people who author the terms of service for Reddit. Those rules will include policies on Brigading - a rule designed to be applied selectively, in bad faith, to censor discussion. In short - good behavior means nothing to those who dislike what you have to say, and will abuse power to silence you.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 01:19 PM
2

I would just like to say, that you chose the right time to stop trying to help. I was wrong to jump in and try to further explain it, and I see that now.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 01:13 PM
8

When feminists claim to be suffering some inequality, its all indefinable "structural systems of systemic structures" working against them in nebulous, unquantifiable ways resulting in some malicious oppression. But, when feminists suggest solutions, do they return to these hidden layers of obscurity? Do they carefully correct these inequalities through the subtle manipulation of these delicate societal threads that they have so expertly discovered and traced and mapped? NOPE! Put thumb on Scale…
/r/MensRights27/06/22 12:18 PM
2

Yeah! Monster3games can't self identify as a joker, what insanity would that lead to?
/r/MensRights27/06/22 12:09 PM
7

Feminism writing its own press releases again. "Our own, perfectly trustworthy research shows pushing patriarchy theory is good for everyone!" Yeah, Right. Why don't feminists like to discuss "gender in the context of INFLUENCE" I wonder?
/r/MensRights27/06/22 12:07 PM
18

Women, as a biological result of being the child bearers end up with more reproductive rights? “It’s just a fact of life" ​ Women, as a biological result of being the child bearers take more time off work, leading to a "Pay Gap"? "REEEEEEE! Fix it! Make Adjustments! It's only Fair!!!" Feminists...? Picking and choosing the applicability of arguments? No, not those stalwart champions of consistency!
/r/MensRights27/06/22 11:58 AM
2

They are not, but the admins of reddit certainly are, and they "outrank" the admins of this sub.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 11:48 AM
2

The specific inequality is, women can Separate their consent to sex, from their consent to Parenthood Men cannot. (And there is no reason for this gender discrimination.) When a man consents to sex, he is indistinguishably signing away the next 18 years of his life to child support payments and he will go to jail if he cannot keep up with the woman's unilateral decision. So, Yes. due to pills, adoption and safe surrender laws, Even WITH a total ban on abortion (It isn't banned) Women STILL have …
/r/MensRights27/06/22 11:42 AM
2

Doing as you're told and complying with feminist demands will make the guilt go away. Don't let them know that though. They might take advantage of that mechanism...
/r/MensRights27/06/22 11:24 AM
2

Halafax is trying to tell you, that you may be persecuted maliciously by biased people in positions of power, who simply dislike men's rights being discussed. One tool such bad actors use is to purposefully write poorly defined "Rules" then apply them selectively, whenever they feel like censoring a valid idea.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 11:01 AM
3

Some rules were INVENTED to be selectively applied.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 10:55 AM
1

The biological ability to give birth, results in women having more Reproductive rights? Too Bad! ​ The biological ability to give birth, results in women taking more time off work contributing to the "pay gap"? Oh Shit! It's not fair! Make Adjustments!! REEEEEEE!
/r/MensRights27/06/22 10:46 AM
1

I think it's a strong decision to stand up and say "I am not as certain on this topic, as some demand I be." And its a great exercise to ask ourselves - What am I certain of, and where does this certainty come from?
/r/MensRights27/06/22 10:37 AM
1

I totally agree. But abortions being left to the states to decide, is not reproductive equality with men. Abortions have not been banned. Screaming feminists, who suddenly feel entitled to the voices they have consistently silenced, are having this reaction to Access to abortions becoming Slightly inconvenienced.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 10:27 AM
3

"Best interests of the child" is the ultimate, Gold plated excuse for our political representatives to get out of representing men and looking into issues in good faith. Then, indeed, nobody could care less how the money is spent. Probably too afraid of the feminist backlash, claiming that being asked questions is "oppression"
/r/MensRights27/06/22 10:20 AM
1

My "Whenever I like, No questions asked, Government pays" right has been slightly inconvenienced. Time to bust out the excusable brand of hate speech!
/r/MensRights27/06/22 10:16 AM
2

I support the current thing! I espouse the permitted view!
/r/MensRights27/06/22 10:12 AM
3

u/frothymothy wants to make shit arguments and run away, without taking responsibility for them. lol This is the 3rd conversation branch, ended in an abrupt logical abortion when cornered.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 10:11 AM
6

Men are forced to pay child support for 18 years for children they don't want. (and often aren't even theirs) and that's with their bodies. And that's not as simple as signing a check and handing it over. - But they're just the provider serfs, so who cares, right? Abortions, pills, adoptions, legal abandonments, women can separate their consent to sex from their consent to parenthood. Men can't. You are a very lengthy privilege check away from being able to take part in this conversation, I sugg…
/r/MensRights27/06/22 09:58 AM
3

"I know that I'm wrong, but don't mention that I'm wrong."
/r/MensRights27/06/22 09:37 AM
1

Good bot.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 09:23 AM
1

The biased media will cover it as if its a perfect, equal comparison, of course. If journalists don't cover counterarguments do they really exist? - Is the sad reality that we're in.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 08:54 AM
7

AND words are violence... can't forget that important rule too. Anybody else find the timing convenient? All signs point to the midterms being an embarrassing skid mark for the Dems. But what's this? A massive single issue for voters to consider...? and it's State based...? Absolutely nothing fishy going on here at all.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 08:44 AM
292

Feminists, like her only see men as a resource to be exploited. Their lives, responsibilities, expectations and difficulties are all totally invisible to them.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 08:19 AM
22

It's absurd how distorted the reporting on current events are. Yet people trust feminism's framing of history. It's crazy.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 04:39 PM
30

Suggestions of Geneva convention breaching forced sterilisation and ethnic cleansing from feminists because they took one step towards being treated like men? Yeah.. totally not a hate movement.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 03:35 PM
7

If we could get passed gynocentrism, we might be able to blame the peretrators. But some lunatics selectively confuse asking questions with "trying to blame"
/r/MensRights26/06/22 02:32 PM
233

I love the trolls that switch from asking -"what have MRAs actually accomplished?" to crying "You and your SCOTUS sleeper agents are responsible for everything!!"
/r/MensRights26/06/22 01:47 PM
29

What did she say to get this response? And when are boys going to matter enough for anyone to ask?
/r/MensRights26/06/22 11:48 AM
28

Wow, abortion rights... What can you say? No, I'm genuinely asking what I'm allowed to say on each topic because that's the state of my freedom of expression in 2022. You can have all the excited energetic support you want, after one year of me being able to voice issues confidently in main stream circles of discussion. Until then, the censors and blockers who suddenly feel entitled to my voice can get fucked.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 10:42 AM
49

It has taken a very small step towards similarity. They can still go to other states where they still have privileged reproductive rights. And there's still plenty of options just for women besides abortion for separating consent to sex from consent to parenthood. But sure, send in the battalions of Handmaid's Tale cosplayers.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 09:53 AM
1

Criminals shouting rape whenever the fancy takes them is a separate issue that greatly needs to be challenged and solved, in its own right. "Give them what they want so they'll MAYBE leave us alone." is simply not acceptable.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 09:42 AM
5

It's sooo 2013
/r/MensRights26/06/22 08:18 AM
1

Just in time to subvert the otherwise inevitable train wreck at the midterms...
/r/MensRights26/06/22 08:16 AM
3

We found it! Megan Rapinoe was "the patriarchy" all along, pushing traditional gender roles like Provider onto men. Here's what feminists want to smash, Here's where feminists claim the patriarchy is hurting men! Off we go then! MRAs, Feminists, let's join together to call out these toxic expectations of masculinity. Don't all rush me at once, please feminists.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 08:13 AM
5

The simping, gynocentrism and the "women are wonderful effect" etc. Mean that feminists can get away with entitlement too big for cogent argument to cover.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 05:18 AM
1

Yeah, that is awful. Having a court force YOUR decisions onto another human being. You are right, totally disgusting.... But that IS how it works right now. Courts force child support payments onto a man who has no choice. I will assume you are equally as disgusted at this situation as well.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 10:39 PM
2

Nothowgirlswork screen capped this discussion and wrote men "never had consequences either" Well apparently they can't read. The whole forced to pay child support thing escaped them. If it happens to men then of course these self serving, over entitled frauds won't see it. Feminism is a product of gynocentrism, and it would dissappear over night if they suddenly had to pay attention and produce accurate arguments.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 10:30 PM
4

It seems to be phenomena specific to reddit somehow. I've written sarcasm in other places without issue but here, I look back at my own sarcastic comments and realise the sarcasm isn't as clear as I'd hoped.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 05:55 AM
35

Men have a problem? That's just the patriarchy harming men - fight for feminism to solve men's problems! Work together with men to solve women's issues? NEVER!!!! BAN! DELETE! SILENCE!
/r/MensRights24/06/22 09:25 PM
7

I have heard that term, but never understood what it meant. Thank you for this wonderful explanation. Maybe this is something different(?) Some times the Bailey can be non existent. like with "Male Privilege" The motte "men's lives are superior, their accomplishments come easier, and therefor should have no time or resources spent on their issues." But when pressed with data on homelessness, education, working hours etc etc. we're told that "That doesn't stop men from being privileged" in a kind…
/r/MensRights24/06/22 03:15 PM
39

There was a high level of premeditation, sophistication, and planning involved in the offending, said Judge Kellar. There is an atmosphere of misandry and male disposability emboldening individual women to weaponize the state in this way. This is an abhorrent crime, one with no good faith research into how big the problem really is - as men's lives matter so little. Surely the term "Gendered Violence" is starkly applicable here. As the vast majority of these cases are women, utilizing pro female…
/r/MensRights24/06/22 12:25 PM
157

If you want to say ugly things about women, you've got to go to obscure, home made message boards on the underbelly of the internet. If you want to say ugly things about men, you don't even need to make your facebook group private.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 11:10 AM
5

It's all just so convenient, isn't it? In a system as varied, tumultuous and statistically noisy as a 'Society' yet feminists always have a neat mental gymnastic sound bite to play, for every occasion, for every situation. And it will always frame women as the victim, it will always absolve feminism of any accountability and it will always dismiss any inequality faced by men. Neat and Tidy of that colossal magnitude simply doesn't exist within genuine studies of human nature. I would love to ask…
/r/MensRights24/06/22 10:42 AM
4

Sounds like, Reddit should cross the street if its walking behind women at night.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 10:18 AM
8

Someone unfairly stereotypes me, and now its MY problem? Nope.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 10:15 AM
12

Does it not strike you as convenient, that EVERY male issue, inequality and disadvantage has some mental gymnastic to tie it back to a "Women are victims" sound bite? In our multi dimensional, statistically noisy, highly varied society, feminists always have a handy card to whip out in Every situation, on Every occasion to neatly make themselves the victim, absolve themselves of responsibility, and dismiss any issue that could be held by a man. How do you not find the impossible heights of that …
/r/MensRights24/06/22 09:54 AM
9

Feminism has pushed very hard for the societal spotlight that it currently enjoys. But along with this attention comes scrutiny. The most egregious anti male, anti equality laws and policies come, undeniably from feminists and feminist teaching. You might have an ideal of what "Feminism" Should mean, and we might even find agreement there. But feminism, as a societal movement is defined by how it has moved our society.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 09:26 AM
5

Spending a year or two surprised at the existence of the pussy pass is fair enough. Hell, why not indulge and spend a whole decade amazed at women's preferential treatment? But spending generation after generation, rolling around in gob smacked, disbelief is pointless. This is reality. This is how it's broken. And on the off chance that our political representatives don't represent us fairly with solutions, let's discuss ways to protect ourselves in real, no bullshit terms - EVEN IF that might t…
/r/MensRights24/06/22 08:18 AM
2

What can you do? You're already doing it. Your simple awareness of their being more to discuss than the hard line feminists admit, is already a far larger support (and relief for men to hear) than you can imagine. THANK YOU.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 08:00 AM
2

Do this, Do that, don't show this attitude, tow this line, have these preferences, make these exceptions... Who are we behaving for?
/r/MensRights24/06/22 07:53 AM
3

The demands of the most entitled have shifted, over the centuries from superior safety to superior societal standing. Feminists look back at a world where they were successfully kept safe (at men's expense) and see those times don't meet their contemporary standards. Therfore "look how downtrodden and oppressed we've always been." As always, with feminism, women are separated from their context with men, freedom from its context of responsibility.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 06:52 AM
18

A lot of feminist terms mean one thing when waved angrily on an activist's banner but conveniently something completely different when a feminist scholar is defending their hate movement.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 06:09 AM
17

"Lens" is such self serving word. What they really mean is "filter"
/r/MensRights24/06/22 06:03 AM
2

In that movie, could we gender swap the trope of woman fights her way through a building full of nameless male guards?
/r/MensRights23/06/22 08:00 PM
42

I wonder what the lowest effort false rape accusation was? Points finger lazily - "That guy raped me, or whatever..." doesn't even look up from phone.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 07:23 PM
4

You've got to go a long way to get to Hyperbole territory where feminism is concerned.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 01:29 PM
1

Around 12 hours is the answer. Feminism is not about hating men. His friend may have identified as feminist but her actions are misandry. Misandry and feminism has no causal relationship. -Peaceful-Domination
/r/MensRights22/06/22 11:12 AM
8

Feminists CLAIM that feminism is not about hating men. Their body of behavior tells a different story. Even YOUR behavior in this discussion where you diminished, trivialized or justified misandry and argued against its criminalization, less than 24 hours ago.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 10:04 AM
1

Its all deeply frustrating, our laws and policies help "Girls" or "Children", "Women" or "People" But I agree with both your frustrations and Douglas's position I think our presence in both the political and cultural spheres are tenuous, but the content, the YT videos, the irrepressible communities around them are a great accomplishment. (or at least comparable/better than the achievements as you have noted) One that could be built on with just adding more content. Woke media is dying, Disney is…
/r/MensRights22/06/22 08:27 AM
2

Standing in front of biased media cameras with pissy, long debunked slogans, reminding policy makers of their gender role, to please feminists for their approval.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 07:50 AM
3

"The patriarchy" is a tin foil hat global conspiracy theory, held by a kind of kkk movement for women that has many functions. Protecting feminist egos wherever men's achievements threaten them. Excusing the laughable bias in the history of feminist research. And rather neatly, excusing themselves from looking in good faith into men's disadvantages through, hypocritically, Victim Blaming. This is how feminists can ignore all the data and evidence, by simply shutting their eyes and repeating thei…
/r/MensRights22/06/22 07:02 AM
16

"It's NOT happening, but if it IS happening, it's men's fault, and if it's NOT men's fault, then it's justified."
/r/MensRights22/06/22 06:44 AM
2

The pretense of oppression is manipulative. If you pretend there is oppression and use that to justify unjust changes, you are a feminist.
/r/MensRights21/06/22 09:19 PM
2

It's different! It doesn't count! Did you hear that everyone? In this specific instance, on this particular occasion there's no accountability for the feminist hypocrisy, according to the feminist, of course. Well that's alright then. Valid arguments only please. Thanks to patriarchy theory people assume that men can't do anything without a global conspiracy behind them, just as you did when you hand waived the work, passion and dedication of "accomplished scientists" as one group.
/r/MensRights21/06/22 09:08 PM
1

Apologies, I'm assuming this is a current news story in the US? It looks as though, that loophole that resulted in her not being arrested, was the cause of her death.
/r/MensRights21/06/22 12:01 PM
2

when you guys are doing well society sees you as more competent and rational No, society thinks we cheated our way to achievement with "patriarchy" and unearned "privilege"
/r/MensRights21/06/22 11:00 AM
6

It is true to some degree so you're right to feel sad. Most young men go through a period of seeing women as robots. You're all normal one day, then puberty hits and something manipulative in women floats to the surface. Good women fight to keep it submerged and the ones we call bad women either don't try or can't. So men are taught the reality. Women are dangerous and many will try to falsely accuse you, even the ones who say they're nice. Many men don't believe it and learn the hard way many l…
/r/MensRights21/06/22 10:14 AM
7

It is ludicrous. The purpose of these rules is not to protect women's safety, (because obviously, criminals won't follow them) but protect women's FEELINGS of safety. Because for the minority victims of violence, the minority victims of violent street crimes, their feelings of safety are more important than your physical safety.
/r/MensRights21/06/22 09:52 AM
1

All hail Friday Night Tights!
/r/MensRights21/06/22 09:24 AM
1

That - I think - is the only way to upset feminism's monopoly. I should not have said its the only way. I accept what you have to say. Progress is being made, "giving up" is, of course futile. But as another avenue to explore, creating our own culture through producing our own content isn't going to hurt and may even lead to surprising places.
/r/MensRights21/06/22 08:49 AM
12

A man doesn’t have people constantly assuming that other men helped him do his work. Yes they absolutely do. I believe you call it "Patriarchy Theory"
/r/MensRights21/06/22 08:32 AM
23

"Equality is Oppression" in other words.
/r/MensRights21/06/22 08:19 AM
38

I've been struggling with the feminist lie of "we only want equality", how entrenched and far reaching that lie is, Vs how little leg work is actually put into maintaining that lie. You just very neatly and succinctly blew my mind.
/r/MensRights21/06/22 08:15 AM
12

How long before we hear the exact same account claiming that "feminism isn't about hating men"?
/r/MensRights21/06/22 08:09 AM
15

I believe that's Feminist for "You are correct, I cannot name a male privilege".
/r/MensRights21/06/22 08:06 AM
13

We should not be further biasing our laws, based on the lies of feminism. Whenever we take a small step towards equality, its always the "we care about men's equality too" crowd, trying as hard as they can to stop or reverse it.
/r/MensRights21/06/22 07:58 AM
44

Feminists - "We're totally not just a cult, devoted to hating men!" Also Feminists - "DON'T YOU DARE CRIMINALIZE MISANDRY!!!!"
/r/MensRights21/06/22 07:50 AM
15

While "love is love", Hate conveniently, comes with all sorts of caveats, justifications and exceptions.
/r/MensRights21/06/22 06:46 AM
60

Men live shorter lives, get worse education, spend the most time working, spend the least money and retire later. Your "privelege" and "oppressed class" mechanism is just another manipulation to excuse your bigotry while hypocritically protecting your bullshit from being called out.
/r/MensRights21/06/22 06:15 AM
139

Men experience misandry. If exceptions are made in hate speech laws to encourage hate towards men to continue, then men experience SYSTEMIC misandry.
/r/MensRights21/06/22 06:04 AM
78

Pretending men are privileged is misandry. Please stop spreading your hate here.
/r/MensRights21/06/22 05:55 AM
3

I think there's an unconscious expectation that we could re-join some "main stream" or societal "in crowd" of some kind that would finally examine our issues in good faith and genuinely work towards fair solutions - If only we could come up with the right argument or articulate a thought in just the right way, or bring enough irrefutable figures to enough debates. But none of that's really going to happen. Between the feminists who control speech on the internet, the feminists who control the na…
/r/MensRights20/06/22 03:13 PM
11

What I find particularly egregious though, is the attitude that if men outperform women, whatever the disparity, then men MUST be cheating somehow, because how else could men outperform a class as perfect and superior as women? Women outperforming men is seen as perfectly acceptable. But global conspiracies and invisible unfairness are the ONLY permissible explanations, wherever women don't come out on top in absolutely any comparison.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/06/22 02:46 PM
21

The lack of accountability is enshrined in law.
/r/MensRights20/06/22 01:34 PM
17

Worried about logic and stats and abstract mathematical approaches? No problem! Join me on a down to earth observation of the real world... HR Departments across the land can see exactly how much money each and every employee makes, they are also staffed with an over-representation of women. So, why aren't we up to our eyeballs in stunning and brave whistle blowers, armed with undeniable, smoking gun evidence of discriminatory pay practices?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/06/22 10:42 AM
6

You should just like, behave for me. Whenever I have a preference, men should just hop to it. No, no, don't ask questions, just comply. Stand by for further demands.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/06/22 06:45 AM
4

"Whatever the disparity, if men ain't 2nd, they're cheating!" feminism
/r/MensRights19/06/22 06:19 AM
16

The core problem with these studies is a statistical slight of hand with the categories being compared. "Rapist" from the moment accused, but "false accuser" only after a judge's ruling at the end of a lengthy set of legal criteria have all been met. Dividing "false accusers" by "rapists" gives you any number you want, that can push whatever agenda you want - because you can simply dictate how easy or hard it is to populate the dividend and divisor categories. Bad faith actors cheat with the cat…
/r/MensRights18/06/22 04:56 PM
2

Banning the pages that gather momentum, strangling the voices that achieve reach. Stamping out the ideas and observations that bring people together - is a full time job that the biggest tech monopolies on the planet struggle with, on a daily basis. Damn straight, there's more of us than we're allowed to believe.
/r/MensRights18/06/22 02:46 PM
8

If false accusations of rape could be looked into as well, that would be grand.
/r/MensRights18/06/22 01:47 PM
9

*the sexist things feminists IN POWER do, represent feminism. There, fixed that for you.
/r/MensRights18/06/22 01:17 PM
25

What's even worse, is when you realise feminists AREN'T EXPECTED to make sense, or be consistent or be correct. The examples of hypocrisy you have pointed out, will never have to be addressed. Because nobody is holding them to any standards. It's how they've spent the last 60 years keeping the slogans despite losing the debates.
/r/MensRights18/06/22 01:08 PM
1

Gender should never make something so straight forward into a special case. Are female rape victims ever at fault? Would suggesting so, ever be acceptable in main stream circles? Hell no! So pretend there's some consistency in the current year discussion on gender politics and treat the man in your scenario no differently.
/r/MensRights18/06/22 10:02 AM
2

Question is irrelevant. It's ALWAYS men's fault, lol
/r/MensRights18/06/22 09:54 AM
7

I bet the vast majority of these men are confident that they are not "creepy" but only fear the name calling. Once again, an atmosphere manufactured by feminism has the "unforseen side effect" of being manipulative and controlling.
/r/MensRights18/06/22 08:19 AM
3

1.3 percent of 67,125 rape offences recorded by police lead to prosecution (I'm sure there's nothing to question about the "rape offences" category there...) Low proportions of a men's issue is proof that nothing needs to be done. but low proportions of a women's issue is somehow proof that more needs to be done. Sounds like protected class bullshit to me.
/r/MensRights16/06/22 03:51 PM
1

We should gather them all up and make a ranked top 100 list.
/r/MensRights16/06/22 12:51 PM
1

In the UK, I believe the proportion of people who consider themselves to be feminist was as low as 7% Pretty low for a social movement, but kinda bloated for a ruling class, I suppose.
/r/MensRights16/06/22 12:50 PM
1

Feminism has the power to write and direct wings of academia and rewrite dictionary definitions. There are feminist organizations that steer and influence the laws coming from our governments. Feminist influence is entrenched in all sorts of places like The United Nations, our main stream media, Hollywood and every tech monopoly. Feminism has the societal spotlight right now. Along with that spotlight that feminists have pushed for, comes a scrutiny that feminists Constantly attempt, but fail to…
/r/MensRights16/06/22 12:41 PM
1

But lucky for them, they're a protected class that can spend decades losing their debates but Keeping their slogans! Phew!
/r/MensRights16/06/22 12:07 PM
1

One set of people assuming that they can dictate what is and isn't "addressing a societal issue" The same set of delusional people trying to dictate what is and isn't " people denying their misogyny" ​ Anger is not a bad emotion, and you utilize your anger in a healthy way by addressing a societal issue. AAAAaand stop the clock! The answer was 2 days, I'm actually surprised they lasted that long!
/r/MensRights16/06/22 11:58 AM
1

What an unfortunate misunderstanding. making a concept that means one very harmless thing, but gets misused as a cudgel to control men. Its such a shame this happened with the oh, so innocent term "Toxic Masculinity". And then, bless my stars, the exact same terrible misfortune occurs to the term "Patriarchy" as well. Gosh! What are the chances that not 1, but 2 terms could have feminist definitions that mean one benevolent thing, but then BOTH get misused and weaponized by a wider community of …
/r/MensRights16/06/22 11:26 AM
4

"Toxic masculinity" is constantly used to berate and control men into adopting whatever behavior self serving, emotionally manipulative, over entitled frauds demand of them. But that's okay because you've got a definition that makes everything alright! It's just a concept that gets misused! No need to look any further... Oh, and the exact same unfortunate misunderstanding happens with the term "Patriarchy" as well... AND the term "Misogyny" Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times…
/r/MensRights16/06/22 10:54 AM
22

When feminists play their games with you, you're supposed to be the ball, not the opposition.
/r/MensRights16/06/22 10:36 AM
13

Feminists shout every man is a potential rapist, then complain when men make situations safer for everyone. Keeping these people happy is not just impossible, but a stupid and dangerous goal to pursue.
/r/MensRights16/06/22 06:07 AM
2

Good point. The chances of a false rape claim backfiring on the false accuser are very small, when the police are involved. But when it's just at the gossip level there's ZERO chance of socially lucrative, life destroying lies blowing up in the accusers face.
/r/MensRights15/06/22 01:17 PM
4

Categories defined by bad faith actors, used to manufacture agenda pushing outcomes, are so worthless, there's not even enough validity in them to "correct" them back to something useful. Also, gender swap the situation. Imagine men could lazily point a finger at any woman, make the right food hole noises and potentially DESTROY HER LIFE, professionally, financially, socially with no real risk to himself. Would feminists- A) Be okay with research telling them to calm down as its only a 5% occura…
/r/MensRights15/06/22 01:03 PM
4

To the morons who think "words" are "violence" - preferences sound like expectations. You wouldn't even need to list what you want. Simply saying that you do HAVE preferences is enough to trigger these people who want to control your private thoughts.
/r/MensRights15/06/22 12:33 PM
26

I am nearly 40 years old. Over my lifetime, so far, I have always found the portrayal of a given group to be an exaggeration. The group itself is always far more grounded and reasonable than they are given credit for... Except for feminists, who are exactly as hateful, reactionary, selectively outraged and bigoted as the maddest characature suggests. Its why they are so difficult to parody, because there's just no more room for hyperbole.
/r/MensRights15/06/22 12:20 PM
8

Everything is a "misogynistic rant" if you let emotionally manipulative frauds decide. The best thing to do then is continue calling out their bigotry and privilege because nobody exists to please those people.
/r/MensRights14/06/22 08:59 PM
257

Hilarious! I'm going to save the below quote- Anger is not a bad emotion, and you utilize your anger in a healthy way by addressing a societal issue. -and see how long before I have to use it under some tone policing feminist who claims to support men expressing their emotions.
/r/MensRights14/06/22 03:03 PM
2

Women aren't stronger than men, so for the sake equality, female characters are portrayed as faster, more agile, smarter and stronger than men....
/r/MensRights14/06/22 11:10 AM
2

At the end of all things, when she is FINALY able to accept responsibility, there will be nobody around her, to apologize to. Its the only time I feel sorry for them.
/r/MensRights14/06/22 10:15 AM
2

If a woman weaponizing the system with nothing more than food hole noises has to look up from her phone at any time during proceedings, then the system is still not biased enough.
/r/MensRights14/06/22 10:01 AM
4

The stronk whamen hero's journey is- She starts out amazing at everything She continues to be amazing at everything Then at the end, all the other characters realize that she's amazing at everthing.
/r/MensRights14/06/22 09:37 AM
3

Its when side characters exist purely to be incompetent, misogynist strawmen, JUST to elevate the stronk whamen character. It's frustrating when stroking feminist ego and echoing their delusions back to them is more important than building decent characters and telling a good story. Top Gun Maverick, was indeed awesome. If Disney had made it then Tom Cruise would have been a washed up failure, an amazing Mary Sue would have put him in his place and showed all the boys how its done. The movie wou…
/r/MensRights14/06/22 09:32 AM
1

Show us what we win for being the nicest people on the internet, or let us ask ourselves "who exactly, are we behaving for?"
/r/MensRights13/06/22 08:54 PM
8

Also, ask yourself, how many of those male senators would look down the barrel of a camera and call out the bigotry of feminism? They would be absolutely correct, and they would be out of a job. Soft and Hard power are fascinating concepts and remember that INFLUENCE is also a factor and is arguably more important than power.
/r/MensRights13/06/22 03:53 PM
17

Oh no. A murky, situation, that's difficult to define. I sure hope there are no unscrupulous or manipulative parties that might use such occurrences to their benefit.
/r/MensRights13/06/22 03:44 PM
4

These women didn't have to bring logic and facts to that debate, they just had to bring outrage and offense - and they knew it. This is a protected class of people that don't have to be correct. Everyone must keep that in mind when engaging. They want to flatten any nuance, so that when she uses the word "rape" in her historic metoo false accusation, people assume she means grabbed off the street and dragged down a dark alleyway AND NOT had consensual sex after 2 glasses of wine, which she regre…
/r/MensRights13/06/22 03:39 PM
34

With this as a baseline, we could calculate how many Depp Wins per hour, would be needed to breach their protected class status.
/r/MensRights13/06/22 03:27 PM
7

Both... Neither... err... Believe all women! Words are violence AND Silence is violence!
/r/MensRights13/06/22 11:10 AM
2

When the Beer Bug hit, Identity politics stopped dead. I completely stopped hearing about it, in day to day life. This lasted for about 1 month / 6 weeks. When it came back, I knew we weren't in for global Armageddon. Ultimately, feminism is the result of entitlements transitioning from superior physical safety in times of danger to superior societal status in modern times of relative safety. If the shit were to ever hit the fan, everyone would become preoccupied with their own, suddenly clarifi…
/r/MensRights13/06/22 10:47 AM
15

I think we should judge feminism, by what we're told by feminists. And we should judge the MRM, by what we're told... By feminists. Yep, that sounds totally fair to me.
/r/MensRights13/06/22 10:28 AM
8

misinterpret feminism as misandry or as a movement intended to take away the rights of men whilst placing women at a higher position in society. Hi there, and welcome to the sub. I see a lot of people misinterpret feminism as a movement about gender equality. But feminism is a supremacist philosophy. Their attitude to every gender disparity is the same - "If Men Ain't 2nd, They're Cheating!" Without some "systemic advantage" or "unfairness" of some kind, these supremacists are UNABLE to explain …
/r/MensRights13/06/22 10:19 AM
4

It's so many biased findings attempting to cement the arbitrary claims beneath them - in circles all the way down. Women oppressed, so men can't suffer, so only research women's lives, so women oppressed.
/r/MensRights13/06/22 06:35 AM
11

Which, defacto makes women assaulting their husbands legal. Not 50 years ago, not 10 years ago, but TODAY.
/r/MensRights13/06/22 06:28 AM
2

If it can't be blamed on men, then it ain't happening - feminism.
/r/MensRights13/06/22 06:26 AM
12

But don't forget "women most affected"
/r/MensRights12/06/22 09:53 PM
16

Damn those patriarchal oppressors and their shorter lives, worse education, who work the most hours and spend the least money! Those mustache twerling evil monsters.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 09:49 PM
4

Malicious weaponization of the state must absolutely be recognised as a crime. THIS is 'gendered violence' Edit: this also a great road map for normal men, outside of law enforcement to protect themselves. Simply install and operate government level surveillance of their false accusers.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 08:29 AM
22

Keeping this influence in mind, it becomes utterly meaningless when a feminist asks "How few women are in positions of power?"
/r/MensRights10/06/22 01:10 PM
38

It absolutely SHOULD work that way. But when they complain, our feminist MSM will say something like: "Misogynist govt wants to trivialize and diminish poor, downtrodden and oppressed victims of domestic abuse." and comment sections under such articles will be as rare as rocking horse poop.
/r/MensRights10/06/22 01:08 PM
30

With great POWER comes great responsibility... ...Which is why feminists prefer INFLUENCE.
/r/MensRights10/06/22 12:54 PM
120

Whatever the disparity, If men ain't second, they're cheating! - Feminism. It's a misandrist and Supremacist movement.
/r/MensRights09/06/22 05:47 PM
9

Surely, putting the toilet seat down, for the next user is ASSUMING THEIR GENDER - (gasp!) I'm sure after these women have checked their privilege on this issue and unpacked their unconscious transphobia, that they will arrive naturally at a more socially responsible policy. We do, after all, live in a society, and we must bare in mind, that it is the current year.
/r/MensRights09/06/22 01:48 PM
1

849,926,107 genders, until feminists want a large, unearned slice of something to themselves.
/r/MensRights09/06/22 01:31 PM
2

"Sexist" and "misogynist" have all lost their power to control. Switching up to "incel" showed their hand too much. As you cannot have one without the other 'Sex' really means 'consent', and 'consent' really means 'approval' "Incel", when used as a pejorative, really means "men who are not approved of by women" THAT'S the big insult, that only feminism's ego could invent - "I disapprove" sick burn, indeed.
/r/MensRights09/06/22 01:28 PM
1

Why do you think feminists are seen as radical and misandrist? Do you think it's 5% down to the behaviors and actions of feminists and 95% down to unfair opinions? do you see it as 50/50? You mentioned a "radical side" of feminism. How much of feminism do you think the Radical side makes up? How many of them do you think are in positions of power and may cause real harm?
/r/MensRights09/06/22 12:59 PM
2

History seems to be a weird blind spot for people. Its a strange area where propaganda WORKS more than it does anywhere else. Everyone is largely on top of their game when it comes to calling out the conveniently missing context of feminist data, the self serving categorizations, or even the slippery re-definition of words. But for some reason, assume however a feminist frames the events of history must be the gospel truth. What is this magical spell that 'history' holds over people?
/r/MensRights09/06/22 12:41 PM
5

Basically, all the debunked slogans will remain the same no matter how many debates on the "Patriarchy" feminists lose. Because they will still say "Ahh, well, under certain definitions, I'm right."
/r/MensRights09/06/22 12:03 PM
3

Who cares what all feminists are like? We have enough radical misandry from the feminists in power.
/r/MensRights09/06/22 11:53 AM
29

"Women fear for their lives when they reject men. Men only fear embarrassment." Another feminist narrative bites the dust.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/06/22 09:23 AM
3

Dictate what's "toxic". Dictate what's "healthy" and you'll never have to tell anyone to "obey"
/r/MensRights06/06/22 07:55 AM
72

I don't consider myself mgtow. But couldn't argue against them if my life depended on it. Even if they WERE wrong about their assertions, even if their attitude WAS an overreaction - So, what? Who is their 'overreaction' harming? Very simple goals, the target of their philosophy is themselves (ie they have no demands or expectations for other people) There's no way to try and tear them down without validating them (which is why those that feel threatened by them will censor instead of debate)
/r/MensRights05/06/22 10:12 AM
6

The media no longer have live unfolding events to compete with. The trial and it's verdict are now complete and have become part of history - feminism's favourite subject.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 09:14 PM
5

The interesting thing it, calling all right wingers nazis, or all MRAs misogynists is losing its power because it is repeated so frivolously and is so obviously baseless. yet pointing out the bigotry of feminism rarely fails to get desperate denial.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 07:59 PM
60

Watch the news closely in the next days and weeks. the selective coverage is going to be obvious. the narrative shaping will begin immediately.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 07:51 PM
109

PSA for the "nOt aLl fEmInIsTs aRe lIkE ThAt!" crowd: These "fake" feminists or whatever you want to call them - They are in control of your track record, more than you are. And that's nobody's problem, but yours.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 08:28 AM
15

Feminists are such frauds! When they're lying about oppression, its all dubious claims, nebulous terms and unquantifiable factors all working together in mysterious highly obscured, invisible ways, that only the loftiest of feminist scholars can see. and we all just have to take it on faith, because not one issue is readily visible. But when they want to SOLVE these so called "issues", Do these frauds return to those levels of subtlety? Do they correct our society by manipulating these fine thre…
/r/MensRights01/06/22 08:13 AM
2

Yep BBC were free to hire whoever they wanted, at times MORE free than the law allows when they racially discriminated in their hiring practices. The BBC made the content THEY wanted to make and pushed the messaging that THEY wanted to push. Audiences switched off in their millions. These ivory tower hypocrites who go to great lengths to make themselves untouchable can't now blame the consequences of their free choices on anybody but themselves.
/r/MensRights31/05/22 02:27 PM
10

Anybody chaining themselves to a standard they don't interrogate will simply be exploited. Aim for a high standard by all means, but don't trap yourself and do the work of your detractors, for them.
/r/MensRights31/05/22 11:30 AM
7

I did notice how the comments see the money pile and the husband as entirely interchangeable.
/r/MensRights31/05/22 11:15 AM
3

The book ends with the characters drowning in their own garbage as the lights blink out and the sewers over flow. After 4 pages.
/r/MensRights31/05/22 10:08 AM
4

And I think all the other activist groups can see the gynocentrism that benefits feminism, and want that for themselves. They will NEVER be able to achieve that. Sure, some corporations will remind themselves to follow the script of support, but it will never compare to the truly unconscious bias. The Brewed over millennia, ingrained in our DNA Real Deal.
/r/MensRights31/05/22 10:02 AM
15

The moment any other demographic is treated like men, it becomes unacceptable. This should be written in marble, 20 feet tall!
/r/MensRights31/05/22 09:53 AM
4

Its used to claim that the only value a person may hold, is the value bestowed upon them by women. Men's gender role, as designed by feminism, is to seek the approval of women by constantly striving to make them happy and comfortable. Any man who is not motivated by pleasing a woman is "Bad". Feminists don't have to demand anybody Obey them, they merely manipulate and maneuver morality to benefit themselves and wait for men to be "Good"
/r/MensRights31/05/22 09:44 AM
9

Oh, brilliant news! Ignore what feminists claim is the definition of feminism, Look to their observable behavior instead. Glad that's all consistently squared away.
/r/MensRights31/05/22 09:29 AM
12

I wonder how they would react if the guy gets an inheritance. Would they consider that a "nest egg" in case the wife becomes abusive? Would her sudden interest in that money become a "red flag"?
/r/MensRights31/05/22 09:19 AM
40

anecdotal accusations claiming specifically fathers telling their, specifically sons not to read books... I'm trying really hard not to make assumptions about what kind of content this female author produces...I'm really trying... It's worth remembering that Cancel Culture is merely the visible side of a larger intention. It's not enough that access to your chosen content is sabotaged by censorious 3rd parties. But you must be tricked and shamed and manipulated and FORCED to consume content that…
/r/MensRights31/05/22 09:00 AM
2

Except women ARE NOT treated like liars, are they? They're not held in contempt of court for perjury, They're not charged with knowingly submitting a false police report. They're not treated like liars until the man is proven guilty. So find another angle to be emotionally manipulative with, since you don't have an argument.
/r/MensRights31/05/22 06:05 AM
16

If they didn't have double standards, then they'd have no standards at all.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 05:11 PM
9

What do you mean agreed? Not under our tears as admissible evidence utopia. C'mon, you've only got a 1 day old troll account. Don't break character already.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 05:08 PM
29

I hear you! There's clearly no reason to keep outdated concepts of justice like Innocent until Proven otherwise. Assigning guilt at the behest of those that make us feel sad, is clearly the more progressive, socially responsible way to go!
/r/MensRights30/05/22 12:43 PM
1

As I have had no exceptions after 24 hours, I will assume that you agree with the premise. Do you find it to be an inherently supremacist attitude, if the only explanation for men doing well is that they MUST be cheating? Or in other words that, without cheating, it's is IMPOSSIBLE for men to outperform women in any metric? Would you consider this pervasive attitude in our society to constitute a gendered issue that directly affects men? Thank you for this wonderful opportunity to voice importan…
/r/MensRights30/05/22 11:51 AM
90

I have no words, all I can do is pointlessly imagine the outrage if the genders were reversed.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 10:27 AM
48

I hope he makes a fortune in his various defamation suits. What this man suffered was nothing short of a 21st century lynching.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 10:16 AM
54

I know, wow, 20 women! So many experiences, so many accusations. Really stop and think about how big that number is. 20 women is a crowd! ...And not one single woman among them could produce one single, solitary shred of actionable evidence. It's such a shame. The cut off for assuming guilt "just in case" is 22.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 10:11 AM
1

20% of men are matching with 80% of women. That means 4 women for each man. Your math is a crime against numbers. What this really means is only 20% of men meet the standards set by 80% of women. This is the exact opposite of : gotten too easy for men to play around with women nowadays. The limited category of men upon whom you are basing your observations are a result of women's filtering, and women's choices. ​ there's no societal preassure for a man to honour making a woman pregnant and marry…
/r/MensRights30/05/22 09:52 AM
2

What I learned from reading this conversation: A: Men should have just asked their lawyers to fix everything, and it would have been magically taken care of. B: Women couldn't possibly ask anybody in their marriage to help with anything. C: There's an enormous motive to falsely accuse your partner of abuse / mental illness / addiction etc. Luckily the super duper fair laws in Australia wouldn't fall for such shenanigans. D: We must appreciate that women are the victims when their husbands leave …
/r/MensRights30/05/22 08:55 AM
15

They want free stuff and playing the victim card helps them get it. Why do we treat these emotionally manipulative frauds as if they have any validity to their arguments at all?
/r/MensRights30/05/22 08:30 AM
5

When arguing with a feminist on the long debunked "Wage Gap" and they are endlessly re-arranging the mathematical goal posts and claiming some 100th attempt at a weird methodology "definitely shows quantifiable victimhood this time!" Just bring them back down to earth with a simple observation. HR departments, up and down the land can see exactly how much money each employee earns. These same HR departments are also staffed with an over-representation of women... So why aren't we up to our eye-b…
/r/MensRights30/05/22 08:04 AM
141

Remember, men! If you succeed at anything, you can't have one second to enjoy your achievement because it was all down to privilege and patriarchy. But your failures are all down to you - you can have those. And for women, it's the opposite! Now if only we had some clue to the 400% suicide disparity...
/r/MensRights30/05/22 06:06 AM
1

Like bat whamen or Netflix' cowboy bebop, or Y the last man...
/r/MensRights29/05/22 03:04 PM
2

The BBC are facing the consequences for making unpopular products, what on earth does skin colour or gender have to do with anything?
/r/MensRights29/05/22 11:16 AM
7

If you want to feed woke to an audience, you have to either trick them or force them to watch it.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 11:10 AM
5

Feminists view on gender disparities is simply -"if men ain't second, they're cheating." Are there any exceptions to this? Are there any disparities where men as a group, come out ahead AND IT IS NOT seen by feminism as a "problem" that needs to be "solved"? Or even exceptions where women come out ahead and feminism IS working to correct an unfair advantage?
/r/MensRights29/05/22 08:15 AM
4

Incitement to commit suicide
/r/MensRights28/05/22 09:59 PM
5

Incitement to commit a crime.
/r/MensRights28/05/22 09:58 PM
2

That's a pretty black pilled take wouldn't you think?
/r/MensRights28/05/22 01:25 PM
2

Wow! Projection, female affiliation as reward, that comment had everything. Five stars!
/r/MensRights28/05/22 01:09 PM
2

Our sleeper agents in the supreme Court overturned roe v wade recently /s Seriously though, Can we stop flip flopping between "what have you accomplished?" and "you evil oppressors are responsible for everything I don't like!"
/r/MensRights28/05/22 01:05 PM
65

I very sarcastically wonder what we will see first. Social studies scholars looking into the ramifications of single motherhood and the children they are bringing up. Or growing up with a father in the house being treated as a specific privilege.
/r/MensRights28/05/22 08:50 AM
3

Perfect example of what I'm talking about. See how it starts with arbitrary declarations motivated to frame women as victims, then a massive wall of text that build on those assumptions cementing women as victims round and around in circles, all the way down. All the topics brought up in this sub? Not mentioned anywhere of course. Sorry guys, those are invisible people problems. And when arguing with someone over the shape of the earth or what's involved in faking a moon landing or what may or m…
/r/MensRights27/05/22 10:14 PM
4

Yeah that's a valid option. Elon accusation could take center stage now.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 08:44 PM
22

"Imperfect Accuser"
/r/MensRights27/05/22 12:03 PM
50

Post verdict Media coverage- Depp wins: Amber Heard and women everywhere are downtrodden and oppressed victims of domestic abuse, let down by the system. Depp Loses: Amber Heard is a stunning and brave survivor who has been vindicated in a court of law, proving that women everywhere are downtrodden and oppressed victims of domestic abuse. Media has been (Largely) quiet on the trial, I think that's because they understand they can't compete with the unfiltered access people have to the truth. The…
/r/MensRights27/05/22 11:17 AM
46

Good! INNOCENT until PROVEN otherwise. (For Everyone!) Or you end up with protected classes of people able to Weaponize The State, with little more than food hole noises!
/r/MensRights27/05/22 11:03 AM
2

The media tries to paint the various online communities as responsible for feminist critical sentiments. As if the 'red pilling' happens within these groups. But its the world outside that makes people ask difficult questions and wonder why the answers are not just absent, but a silence seems to be intentionally maintained on the subjects. Other people who have commented have 1st hand accounts of truly appalling treatment, and I am very lucky not to have similar experiences. I was merely brought…
/r/MensRights27/05/22 08:12 AM
6

The feminist solution to every "problem" is so clumsy and ham fisted, they just want to put their thumb directly on the scales and PUSH But when these feminists are trying to argue that a problem exists, its all nebulous terms and subtle, undefinable factors, invisible to anyone without a gender studies degree. It's such bullshit.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 06:54 AM
30

Feminist academics research women's issues and exclude men. And surprise, surprise, their results show only women suffer hardships. It turns out they can't see any hardships among those they insist be invisible - this snowballs into more studies exploring only women. Round and round we go until they start getting suspicious of all this one sided suffering. And gynocentrism ensures when feminists make a tin foil hat, global conspiracy theory, its automatically treated as if its legitimate.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 08:55 PM
8

They get to pontificate about men in "power" while they monopolize influence over every one of them.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 03:38 PM
66

Scapegoating all of societies problems onto one category of people. The nazis would be proud of her.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 03:02 PM
26

Yes! Feminist academia is all about "power structures" and "cultural norms" and all these other frame works TO ALLOW THEMSELVES to talk about men as a single group, to make sweeping statements. But talk of women as a group, well get them screaming at you. Talk of even Feminists as a group will have them yelling "nOt alL FeMiNiStS aRe lIkE tHaT!!!" It's almost as if they're just a bunch of laughable hypocrites, who's political standing can't be justified by the legitimacy and merit of their argum…
/r/MensRights26/05/22 03:00 PM
70

Do men, convicted of murders get glamour shots plastered all along their articles?
/r/MensRights26/05/22 02:47 PM
12

Article starts with biased picture propagating the myth that men cannot be victims. (Where may I ask, is the social responsibility in our post Heard society?) Forgets the word "alleged" exists when discussing pre-verdict victim status. ​ Then I noticed this gem. Under the laws that ensure a FAIR trial, the police and Crown Prosecution Service in England and Wales must hand over any evidence to a suspect that could help them defend themselves at trial - a legal process known as "disclosure". ... …
/r/MensRights26/05/22 01:09 PM
2

There have, of course been the occasional article and story pushing the "men can't be victims" tripe already. But I think the rest of the MSM is on their starter blocks, ready for the gavel to drop on this trial. Win or lose - brace yourselves.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 11:25 AM
7

Being Wrong should mean something... But it has no effect on the influence, the outcomes, the policies and the privileges that will be handed to these people. It sounds like hyperbole and I'm struggling to articulate this. But Validity, itself, is not a standard that is applied to these people. It is simply not a factor. With a little more self awareness, she could genuinely ask "So what, if I'm wrong?"
/r/MensRights26/05/22 10:16 AM
71

So "Family Violence organizations" is a nice gender neutral term but its filled with maliciously gendered stereotyping and biases. That will be useful for the propagandists to hide behind whenever they want to lie about feminism "standing for men's equality too" All this policy making from an ideology that has never had to establish its own validity outside of its own echo chambers and any standing it has was achieved through censorship of scrutiny.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 10:05 AM
31

Late stage Duluth model.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 08:49 AM
31

Its at least in part caused by treating all males as if they were born morally irredeemable. The clumsy, ignorant solution is to treat men MORE like the dangerous stereotype they're made out to be, resulting in more lashing out. This is a problem for the people who are utterly incapable of interrogating their own actions and attitudes.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 08:49 AM
3

Oh, I don't know... do you think our betters would be okay with that?
/r/MensRights25/05/22 08:58 PM
21

This trial has gravely wounded the feminist dogma on domestic abuse. We have already begun seeing the scab start to form over it, with help from the usual suspects in the media.
/r/MensRights25/05/22 03:51 PM
11

Without 6 degrees and 4 PHDs in gender studies subjects, we're all essentially stumbling around blind, utterly dependent on the helpful explanations of our betters.
/r/MensRights25/05/22 03:43 PM
23

I wonder how many of these people who talk about "Real Victims" also merrily lump women's ATTEMPTS at suicide in with male suicide figures, and clump women couch surfing in with male homelessness figures?
/r/MensRights25/05/22 03:41 PM
4

It gets even more absurd when you remember that 'micro-aggressions' are supposedly a thing, that we're all expected to maintain exhausting vigilance and walk on egg-shells to avoid committing. While these activists clumsily forget that victims of abuse, whatever their sex, ARE "real victims"
/r/MensRights25/05/22 03:38 PM
1

Well, now its about your misguided attempts to speak for others, and how you deal with being corrected.
/r/MensRights25/05/22 02:03 PM
45

I remember reading some man hate propaganda on Facebook a while back. Saying what horrible terrorists incels are and gosh what nasty things they said about women, isn't it horrible, pearl clutch pearl clutch, won't someone do something!! But the screengrabs of their horrible comments were from some obscure little message board from the ass crack of the internet. All the while, equally horrible comments can be found from feminists on PUBLIC facebook groups!
/r/MensRights25/05/22 12:29 PM
1

Its about how you're incorrect about - the empathy we never had.
/r/MensRights25/05/22 11:56 AM
11

An attack specifically aimed at a group based on a protected characteristic ...But not a "hate crime" because reasons.
/r/MensRights25/05/22 11:17 AM
3

The joke is fine, but the double standard stinks. The socially responsible considerations and Politically Correct attitudes that Protected Classes DONT have to worry about, are hard to ignore.
/r/MensRights25/05/22 11:04 AM
2

I like Indianna Jones and the Temple of Doom, but the Willie Scott character, made me feel a little uncomfortable as she was a helpless, stereotypical, screamy portrayal of women, that would annoy feminists. But then in later years, I saw what self serving, selectively outraged hypocritical clowns feminists were. I started asking myself "Who am I behaving for?" and I just gave myself the permission to enjoy that part of the movie too. You HAD empathy, but its gone now. ​ Two wrongs make a right.…
/r/MensRights25/05/22 10:45 AM
4

To all the feminist lurkers, To all the concern trolls! This is your opportunity! To voice your concern about the objectification of characters, about clothes being removed without consent, about predatory gazes. About the light hearted tone when dealing with potentially traumatic events! Roll up, Roll up! All the "Feminism stands for men's equality too" crowd! All the "Not all feminists are like that!" tribe! Come and make your protest heard today! And next time a feminist issue with some movie…
/r/MensRights25/05/22 10:34 AM
1

These are disgusting people with disgusting methods with ZERO qualms about outright lying in the short term and harming communities in the long term. But at least we hold the moral high ground for not gate keeping.
/r/MensRights25/05/22 10:19 AM
2

Yes, it does make it less of an echo chamber, objectively so. Feminist spaces banning people for wrongthink is MORE of an echo chamber than feminists being able to speak and earn the downvotes for their ignorant, disconnected arguments. If anything you are a walking talking example of the low standards expected of your protected class. If you HAD to make better better arguments, you would.
/r/MensRights25/05/22 10:08 AM
10

Philips says she’s “truly sorry” for the mistakes, which “were without question mine and those mistakes breached the rules”. So she's also incompetent with tax payer money. I shall sit back and watch as she is handed the very harshest punishment that may be dealt out to a proud, left leaning feminist politician. Absolutely Nothing.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 03:32 PM
11

Comes in making absurd baseless claims, then demands sources when people reply, then demands more sources because they didn't like the first sources. What a joke!
/r/MensRights24/05/22 01:40 PM
1

Elon Musk (recent annoyer of the Left) is currently being accused of historic sexual assault. So "Not Much" is my current answer, but we'll see how it plays out.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 01:23 PM
20

The article sheds light on her being a reasonable person to work with. She had a good relationship with her colleagues and enjoyed humor and a degree of banter. Then one day she exploded. The same old accusations, we're routinely told not to worry about. Horrific accusations designed to be evocative enough to have ruined careers, personal relationships or even taken away the accused's liberty. For what? To cover up her mistakes, to save her ego. Am I safe, in my job? Could I spot who could do th…
/r/MensRights24/05/22 01:13 PM
2

The phrase "When you point a finger, 3 fingers point back" is never applied when men are driven to violence towards women. In those instances, men's actions spontaneously manifest out of the clear blue sky. Until the influencers that control policy makers are capable of self examination, this will never be addressed.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 11:04 AM
4

I think that feminist arguments and logic always meet the standards expected of them. The bad news is, that NO standards are expected of them. Their privileges do not hinge on their ability to produce consistent, robust philosophies. It doesn't matter what they say, they are simply a protected class of people. Being demonstrably wrong, does nothing to harm their world views. Have you ever noticed how, over the years, they Lose the debates, but Keep the slogans?
/r/MensRights24/05/22 10:47 AM
2

If [Gestures broadly at everything] is their version of "dropping everything" I would be terrified to ask what their version of apathy is.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 10:41 AM
4

They couldn't bring themselves to care about men's mental health, even if their lives, quite literally depended on it.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 10:40 AM
2

There's also something deeply entitled about assuming that her correction, her claim, her Explanation is worth more and has more authority than entire groups of people's Observations. Especially when you consider MRA's are a group of people, who have VERY limited capacities to talk with each other freely, yet are still coming together with very similar experiences. IMO, saying "Not all feminists are like that" and truly expecting that to make everything okay, IS behaving just like those feminist…
/r/MensRights24/05/22 10:28 AM
3

They think that the CURRENT STATE of attitudes towards men's mental health and suicide, the resources spent, the media coverage given... is "Dropping everything"...? And they think the google doodles, the promotional ice cream flavors, the constant applause from every major corporation, the protection and pandering from every tech monopoly and pro feminist messaging in every movie, tv show, advert on every screen everywhere... Is their "uphill battle"???? Oh, Jesus Christ!
/r/MensRights24/05/22 10:17 AM
5

The trick feminists play with false accusation statistics is men count as "rapists" the instant they are accused, but women only count as "false accusers" after a very specific Judge ruling after a very specific set of legal hoops have all been jumped through. Comparisons made by bad faith actors, between categories that are defined and maintained by those same bad faith actors are AT BEST meaningless, and far more likely maliciously misleading.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 09:44 AM
4

Men's lives are treated as less important that women's Perceptions of safety. How little importance is going to be given men's perceptions?
/r/MensRights24/05/22 09:12 AM
27

'I have no mercy, no fear and not an ounce of emotion, or what I once thought was love for this gold digging, low level, dime a dozen, mushy, pointless dangling overused flappy fish market,' said the text which has been used as evidence in court. If this was a woman talking about a man, especially a male abuser, feminists everywhere would be tripping over their own Empowerment Boners for a month.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 09:04 AM
13

"Winners" or "Victims", in feminist framing devices, women can never "Lose".
/r/MensRights24/05/22 09:01 AM
3

Feminist need to feel free of any responsibility or accountability for the actions of any woman. With that as their defined goal, mental gymnastics ensues to get them there.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 08:15 AM
4

We are and that is their greatest privilege.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 07:58 PM
7

feminists argue like they belong to a Protected class they can keep a "Dialogue" going for weeks without learning anything or realizing their world view is skewed. I would argue that this is harmful to the person who brought the stats, spoke with manners, and sourced their points. They should be spared that waste of time and effort.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 03:36 PM
7

Feminists denying false accusation statistics, in their best Gimli voice - "That still counts as one!"
/r/MensRights23/05/22 03:29 PM
169

"I want to go topless" After you have translated from feminist to English, really means - "I want to control how you respond to me going topless" These people think they can assume that kind of authority, and they think they're the oppressed ones.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 03:27 PM
1

I've heard it mentioned twice on the radio, all day. They avoid all mention of gender until the very end of the article where they say "she has also been suspended"
/r/MensRights23/05/22 03:10 PM
11

And how is avoiding ridicule working out for us?
/r/MensRights23/05/22 11:40 AM
1

And don't forget the actions of our feminist journalists. Who would rather cut off their own arm than report on a men's group securing a win for equality. I can think of no bigger or more direct beat stick used against men than the selective coverage of our main stream media.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 10:44 AM
1

Do women fight for rights though? Could you consider what feminists do at feminist protests, "Fighting"? No extended presences, no hunger strikes, no brutal clashes with national guard, or even really the police. Feminists don't "Fight" for their rights, they whine for them, they stand in front of biased media cameras with their pissy, long debunked little slogans and they very peacefully remind our politicians that a protected class is unhappy with their decision making, and they better take an…
/r/MensRights23/05/22 10:29 AM
1

I bet the men would still have to pay for these mandatory surgeries. A 'right' is only free when feminists demand them.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 10:18 AM
1

Men can't walk away. The whole core of your pithy, mic drop comeback is a fantasy. You're just a protected class with no idea how to make solid arguments, because you've never had to. You face no expectation to be correct, you don't have to pay attention when you draw equivalences, you can ignore what people have said before your comment: He’s equating the legality prohibiting a procedure with the legality of forcing a procedure on boys. because those simply aren't standards that are applied to …
/r/MensRights23/05/22 10:01 AM
64

Why are we the only people on the internet who aren't gatekeeping properly? What prizes do we win for being everyone's doormat?
/r/MensRights23/05/22 09:39 AM
27

Feminism needs the cultural attention, but can't stand the scrutiny.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 09:34 AM
57

Teach women not to lie.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 09:31 AM
29

I'm reminded of seeing Dara O Briain live. He was talking about Catholicism and how nobody could ever leave the church. If you publicly renounced your faith and joined a cult in the woods, you wouldn't be seen as a "Non-Catholic" you would be seen as a "Bad Catholic" And it seems that no matter how monstrous a woman may be, no matter how evil, abusive or manipulative she is, she doesn't stop being a "victim", she merely becomes an "imperfect-victim"
/r/MensRights23/05/22 09:30 AM
1

There's 3 things that feminists are certain of. Women are always victims Men are always evil and violent and Men's hostility towards feminist rhetoric just spontaneously manifests out of thin air, without cause or origin.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 09:03 AM
2

Ahh, yes. To be reduced or hampered in speed or efficiency by an exterior effect. To quote Tropic Thunder: "Never go full reduction in speed or efficiency by an exterior effect"
/r/MensRights23/05/22 08:51 AM
6

The expectation of chivalry has not gone away. Where it used to be a code to protect physical safety, it now protects the safety of the ego instead. Oh yes, M'lady of course women do better in education, because you're just SOOooo clever! Nothing to look into there! Gasp! Women make less money than men?? This cannot be, M'lady! The scoundrel cheaters shall be found! Leave no stone unturned! What foul miscarriage of justice is this?? A Woman?? Guilty of a crime?? surely, there is some error! Hand…
/r/MensRights23/05/22 08:46 AM
12

Men in power everywhere? That must be why our movies are so pro male, our news coverage is so unbiased, our laws are applied so equally and why no father anywhere has had problems in any family court. Influence > power.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 06:47 AM
3

Also those that push to become mods are doing so to repress speech, more than they are to protect it. Using their tools against them is a must - it results feminist hate speech being removed, or a bogged down reporting system that can no longer repress speech or the very idea of "hate speech" being abandoned. It's win/win/win
/r/MensRights22/05/22 10:19 AM
1

There are no prizes for being the nicest people on the Internet.
/r/MensRights22/05/22 09:43 AM
10

How recent do instances of gynocentrist injustice need to be, in order to satisfy you? What are your rules on people who were not yet aware of such articles? Is it okay for them to observe the overt pro female bias, or have they just missed the boat? How do you feel about feminist framing of "historical oppression" are they just outrage baiting? Or do you apply more lenient rules in that case?
/r/MensRights22/05/22 09:40 AM
3

I think the media coverage and anti male propagandists are staying out of the way of this run away train of a trial - While it's still under way. AFTER the trial however, the feminist framing devices will be all over it, scabbing over this wound to their narrative. We should look out for it and post it in this sub. In the UK I'm already hearing news coverage move away from depp/heard and focus on a defamation trial of footballers wives -its such obvious bullshit.
/r/MensRights21/05/22 11:27 AM
-1

It's all fun and games and meant in good spirit, until her lawyer is reading out his messages in a court room...
/r/MensRights21/05/22 11:13 AM
53

False accusations drop, Australian law reversed.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 01:29 PM
1

Can you imagine if some blue haired feminist journalist at the Rolling Stone or Pink News talked to one of these whistle blowers? They'd be tipping desks over with their victim boners.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 11:53 AM
1

This is the Eric July observation on Tokenism. Hollywood shows no faith in any 'diverse' characters, unless a character used to be a straight white male. It is insulting to the audience to give a character a short cut to high status because the studio wants some quick virtue points and especially insulting to do that at the expense of characters that earned their 'badass' status scene by scene, movie by movie. I think it is gradually pushing audiences away, or, at least hastening the onset of bo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/22 11:27 AM
2

An excellent thought exercise, and a very useful and often forgotten tool to keep handy. A good read!
/r/MensRights20/05/22 10:05 AM
21

I don't consider myself mgtow but It so very hard to argue with that position, when its clear, that once a man is accused of something, the system will crush him. It won't be interested in justice or fairness. A man, once accused has NO agency, once the he's fed to that system. The path of least resistance and the area in which you have the MOST agency to protect yourself is in deciding how much contact you have with women PRIOR to being accused.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 09:41 AM
1

An individual's preferences are their own, nobody is under ANY requirement to debate or justify them to anyone. No matter how loudly entitled SJWs screech about it.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 09:25 AM
11

What boils my piss, is how different disparities are treated, when women are behind or in front. Women behind in earnings? Let's invent, study after study, apply methodology after methodology. Let's rearrange the math so much, those numbers sit up and dance! If we keep going, we're bound to scrape together some semblance of quantifiable victimhood eventually! Young men behind in education? Fuck those guys! Who cares?
/r/MensRights19/05/22 02:52 PM
8

Another day, another imaginative pay gap re-count... HR departments across the land can see exactly how much each employee is paid. They are also staffed with an over-representation of women. So, why aren't we up to our eye balls in stunning and brave whistle blowers, with indisputable, smoking gun evidence of women suffering pay discrimination?
/r/MensRights19/05/22 02:28 PM
10

sounds like Toxic Femininity.
/r/MensRights19/05/22 01:02 PM
28

Women's soccer players offered exact same pay as male players by the US Soccer Federation. Women's soccer players TURN DOWN this offer and it is reported on by MSM as a stunning and brave victory for feminists. Women's soccer players then SUE the USSF in March 2019 for pay discrimination to huge fanfare of the MSM. Its revealed that the female players ARE PAID MORE than the male players due to all of their benefit packages. Now the male players have to subsidize the women's team, so they can hav…
/r/MensRights19/05/22 12:07 PM
32

"Hits partner on head.." that's a funny way of saying "Attacked" or "attempted to murder" even though that's exactly what she plead to. Also apologetics for the woman only 27 words into the article. Another fine day to be a man.
/r/MensRights19/05/22 10:46 AM
13

Anything the guy did to solve, or mitigate the situation, absolutely would have been used against him when framed as a form of abuse or antagonization. This guy did everything right. non engagement, called police. Criminal behavior will, of course, get a pass because vagina, but this is the best way you play the biased game.
/r/MensRights19/05/22 10:19 AM
21

Swap the genders and you'd be treated like a stunning and brave hero. Its a miracle that the situation is at an end without you being falsely accused of some BS. Stay strong and keep your head on a swivel.
/r/MensRights19/05/22 08:19 AM
7

As well as other effects, Its also a disgusting drip feed suggestion to all men that when they fail, they have to own it. But when they succeed, they can't enjoy that because its all down to 'patriarchy' and 'privilege' The erosive effect on mental health is just heart breaking.
/r/MensRights19/05/22 08:00 AM
2

I want to see recognition for the victims of false accusation. weaponizing the state with little more than food hole noises must be recognized as a specific crime. The victims are not, other people who will be believed less, or the state for its wasted resources. The Victim is the person who was falsely and maliciously accused. ​ I wish you luck in reclaiming the term "feminist".
/r/MensRights19/05/22 07:54 AM
1

I think the general solution is escapism and distraction. a lot of people are looking to Manga and Anime as they don't have the woke garbage problem that afflicts so many western franchises, My distraction is older tv shows and anti woke youtube streamers. (Hail Friday Night Tights!) Bear in mind that if there were an easier comfortable route out of your problems, then you would have found it by now. So you might need to force yourself to look at some options like hobbies or exercise. I used to …
/r/MensRights18/05/22 12:55 PM
3

When feminist scholars search for inequalities, its all poorly defined terms and nebulous, unquantifiable structures, all interacting in heavily obscured ways that somehow result in unfairness for women, and if you lack absolute faith in any part of their findings then you're a hateful misogynist. But when its time for feminist scholars to suggest SOLUTIONS to these problems - do they return to these deep places? do they want to manipulate these mysterious threads that they claim to have so expe…
/r/MensRights18/05/22 10:04 AM
16

And those intolerant bigots, with their marches and their book burnings and angry speeches, scapegoating all of society's problems onto one handy category of people. With mainstream media and academia at their beck and call to push whatever agenda they wish... Also aren't the amazing people to be monopolizing vigilance against Nazism...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/05/22 09:51 AM
29

It gives me a kind of strange glimmer of hope. in order to keep out the "wrongthink", they have to be this obsessive, this paranoid. Well thought out, consistent, robust philosophies just don't need to be protected in this way. From the most hateful reddit misandrist, to the loftiest gender studies professor - censorship and non engagement is feminism's ONLY defense. Behind the, admittedly formidable iron defenses, it's so pitifully fragile.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/05/22 09:35 AM
23

There's so much wrong with what they say, that you can't succinctly unpack it all in one comment. Ill try to touch on some stuff- Banning people who follow your subs rules IS "compromising on your goals" I despise the feminist love of censorship one day, followed by entitlement to your support and "Voices" the next day. Influence > Power. Feminists love to keep the conversation on "Power Structures" but just look at who's influence, the law makers, corporations and tech monopolies cater to. Ther…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/05/22 09:11 AM
19

Its not clear that she has 0 screen time. I believe its still 10 mins right now. but I have commented the same observation on various situations before- Equality fixes for women at the very first opportunity (Johnny Depp fired from Beasts the instant he was accused) Equality fixes for men only when continued Inaction becomes Embarrassing (After YEARS of injustice and indisputable evidence of Amber Heard's abuses of Johnny Depp being made public, WITHIN the backdrop of undeniable sexist double st…
/r/MensRights18/05/22 08:55 AM
25

"Behind every great man, is a great woman!" A selectively applied feminist slogan which allows feminists to swoop in and assume the credit for every great invention, clever idea and inspiring deed in all of history. But what role do women play in the mental state of men driven to violence? Suddenly, men exist in a convenient vacuum and their actions are their own. Funny that...
/r/MensRights17/05/22 09:53 AM
1

I can certainly see that within the US context, the difference is MASSIVE. Sick? Too bad, no pay. Women have the ouchies? Oh, you poor petal, have 2 - 3 weeks extra paid vacation per year. You poor darling! Things would be better for everyone if the employee/employer relationship were re-examined. But Feminists won't stand for language like "everyone" will they?
/r/MensRights17/05/22 09:29 AM
25

Sounds like she Ovary-acted.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 08:01 AM
59

Absolutely! Report. If the police shrug it off because gynocentrism then report that higher, call it out on social media, bring attention to the double standards.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 07:59 AM
8

It gets worse. When the poor victim tried to go home she was abducted and held for ransom, by the taxi driver that she couldn't give informed consent to giving her a lift home...
/r/MensRights17/05/22 07:52 AM
3

OK. If the game is days off due to biological realities of your gender. Then men should have their own days off for health checks for cancer since men's cancers receive less research and attention. The days off should be for mental health awareness because of that pesky 400% difference in suicide. Use the time to check in with male friends to make sure they're doing okay. And generally for men living shorter lives and retiring later. I'm sure these women are consistent enough to go for it.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 09:00 PM
11

How come women getting higher grades in education isn't treated with the same suspicion of tin foil hat global conspiracy, as men making more money in employment? Pay gap's a total myth, but that doesn't stop dozens of recounts and inventive methodologies and new approaches, desperately scraping around for some crumb of unfairness. But girls outperform boys in education? Don't worry about it. Massive over-representation of female teachers? Nah, its fine! Huge enrollment differences in university…
/r/MensRights16/05/22 10:21 AM
26

Whatever the disparity, men are always cheating somehow wherever they outperform women. Feminists are gender supremacists
/r/MensRights15/05/22 08:32 PM
1

If you're paying for a situation, over which you have absolutely no input, isn't that a kind of "taxation without representation"?
/r/MensRights15/05/22 05:02 PM
3

During interview, the detainee told police inspectors - "I'm 94, you know." Despite the grave nature of the crimes, the suspect seemed only interested in who was going to feed his cat. The police investigation into this callous monster is continuing...
/r/MensRights15/05/22 04:49 PM
5

Remember that conversation, next time you face an expectation to reach some feminist standard. What you should and shouldn't like. What you may and may not hold an opinion on. How you should and shouldn't act in certain situations. And ask yourself: Who am I behaving for?
/r/MensRights15/05/22 09:57 AM
1

I've never heard of shit-test. What's that one?
/r/MensRights14/05/22 11:45 PM
5

He does and I hope thats not a problem for you.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 10:03 PM
5

What's wrong with a little inclusivity? Why can't a man be portrayed as skilled or sucessful? Come, come now, diversity is our strength, after all.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 09:09 PM
10

Why is every movie and TV show with a stronk whamen character treated like the first and only instance? Hollywood hates men. We get a movie like spiderman no way home, maybe once every three years, the rest is predictable super amazing women that we're supposed to call 'diversity'.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 09:05 PM
4

Then thank the questionnaire team that are supposed to greet you afterwards. "It's SO GOOD to see resources finally spent on men's issues like mental health. You're all doing such important work!"
/r/MensRights14/05/22 07:10 PM
26

Police arrested nearest man, who was 3 doors down and very confused about the whole thing.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 12:16 PM
46

TAKE IT as a mental health support initiative for men. "Do you really think I'm pretty? Oh wow, thank you! I really needed to hear that, today." It will drive them nuts.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 06:10 AM
2

When feminists assert a disadvantage, its all unquantifiable, calculation defying elements culminating nebulously in non disprovable inequality. And feminists have been skilled enough to find and track all of these elements But when feminists propose a solution, their usual steps are - place thumb on scales, push. We've all got to be vigilant against a 1001 invisible, unconscious ways that could victimise or oppress women. But when these policy makers want to just hand women an extra 3 weeks hol…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/22 09:56 PM
18

Woman "Jailed for life" as in paroled in 6 months or jailed for life... for life? If the latter it must have been a very depraved crime AND rock solid, air tight undeniable guilt.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 05:52 PM
6

Woman with a goal vs a 'disposable' man.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 02:20 PM
1

Feminists fully expect everyone to believe the pay gap is caused by countless strange, unquantifiable factors, that defy all calculation as they nebulously culminate in their non-disprovable claim. AND THEN turn around and insist that an extra 3 weeks off per year for women only, can't possibly affect anything - Move along. Nothing to see here.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 02:05 PM
30

Conscription Forced child support payments A rather recent *AHEM* medication mandate. ​ I love it when feminists think their slogans show how downtrodden and oppressed they are, but actually reveal how invisible men are to them. It reminds me of their galaxy brain, smash hit: "Boys will be Boys Held accountable for their actions Just Like Girls Are" Which is an open goal inviting men to talk about prison disparities and biases in application of the laws etc. Never change feminists, you self obse…
/r/MensRights13/05/22 10:06 AM
3

It mentions what to "Censor" means, and every action that would fall under censorship. But it is unclear on who a "censor" may be.(or at least, I couldn't find that during my skimming) ie is it specifically regarded as censorship when youtube removes your content or is it only censorship when the government does it? I would, of course, like it to recognize that the tech monopolies are capable perpetrators, under the law of Censorship.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 09:53 AM
8

I shall have to make better efforts in future.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 09:26 AM
15

As I've commented before- Platforms correct perceived inequalities against women at the first opportunity, the first nudge, the very first suggestion that an inequality may be taking place. Platforms ignore inequalities against men, until such time the platform can no longer stand the embarrassment of its inaction.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 09:19 AM
24

Far worse than men's deaths counting less than women's deaths - Men's deaths count for less than women's PERCEPTION of women's safety.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 09:09 AM
16

Double the number of missing men, but women's FEELINGS of safety is the national news story.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 09:07 AM
14

Now I wouldn't want to cast aspersions on any larger movement, or attribute my observations to a whole philosophy. So I shall just say - On THIS particular occasion... It would appear the feminist figures may mislead a casual reader to making an incorrect conclusion, due to context, missing from the presented information. Even leading to an incorrectly INFLATED perception of women as victims. In THIS specific instance. SLASH FUCKING 'S'!!!
/r/MensRights13/05/22 08:43 AM
7

I can't believe [SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORM] is platforming your bigotry! I don't feel safe!
/r/MensRights13/05/22 08:36 AM
101

feminists love to bring this up in suicide discussion, they've just got to find some way to bring the attention back to themselves "it's not JUST about the deaths, you know. There's more to it than that." But see how they like talking about "women's attempts" in discussions of domestic violence "Stop trying to muddy the waters! the BODY COUNT is all that matters, you manipulative mysoginist!" Feminists try to dictate the framing and goal posts of every discussion to benefit themselves. Far from …
/r/MensRights13/05/22 05:01 AM
2

Feminist with loud speaker: "What do we want??" Feminist Crowd: "EQUALITY!!" Feminist with loud speaker: "When do we want it??" Feminist Crowd: "SOMETIMES!!"
/r/MensRights12/05/22 01:39 PM
1

Don't know who you are. Don't know what you do. Don't care. I believe Jeremy Clarkson said it best - "Oh no! Anyway..."
/r/MensRights12/05/22 01:29 PM
27

No cost, no risk. Avenge your bruised ego by Weaponizing The State. There's no such thing as an "overreaction" if your target is viewed as disposable.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 01:02 PM
3

If the various activist slogans are to be believed, words are violence AND Silence is violence. Fun times.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 11:23 AM
3

A total Side note - compare feminist discussions of DV with feminist discussions of suicide. In one of these subjects, talk of "women's attempts" will absolutely not be tolerated. and people will be reminded that the bodies in the morgues are the bottom line of the topic. But in the OTHER topic, the deaths are only one aspect of the conversation, and due attention should be given to "Women's attempts" ...I forget which one's which though. ;)
/r/MensRights12/05/22 11:20 AM
6

He said "Feminists" don't care, you clumsily conflated "feminists" with "women". Its like you don't even care or something. ​ Feminists care, because the same men murdering other men on the streets are the ones abusing/murdering their girlfriends/wives. If they weren't hurting women, you wouldn't care about them hurting men - you said the quiet part out loud.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 11:13 AM
3

Whatever the problem is, men don't face it and it doesn't exist. Until we have a way to blame men for it. -feminists.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 11:05 AM
2

A Support strike, until men can consent to parenthood.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 10:58 AM
182

The double standard is what stinks so much worse than the actual jokes. The eggshells, protected classes DON'T have to walk on are hard to ignore.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 10:54 AM
1

Reading this AFTER she nuked her posts - "Paper abortion" should be permitted if man is in very low income situation and mother is financially stable. Did she really say this?? Is she saying - "you can have your consent to parenthood IF and only IF you're of no financial value to me." OMG!! Feminists! Seriously!! Women can separate their consent to sex, from their consent to parenthood. but heaven forfend men get the same autonomy.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 10:44 AM
2

Feminist: Men should show emotion! Men: shows emotion Feminist: [Post deleted by user.]
/r/MensRights12/05/22 10:23 AM
1

What makes your friend's sad story any more relevant than those of the men who's whole lives (professional, financial, familial, personal!) have been destroyed because some privileged liar was able to WEAPONIZE THE STATE against him, with nothing more than food hole noises?? If laws and policies (and you) are happy to shit on the innocent, because "Just in Case", then congratulations! You're a Protected Class. Edit: "Comment deleted by user" Ok, fine... Let's all talk about stuffed toys and skin…
/r/MensRights12/05/22 10:04 AM
2

Feminists basing conclusions on research? That way around is just absurd!
/r/MensRights12/05/22 09:31 AM
1

Besides, men have no more say in this than women. The issue is for the Supreme Court to decide. Being a man gives me no great power of influence over the Supreme Court. Absolutely! Trolls- "But what have MRAs actually achieved??" Trolls AFTER scutus leak - "You and your supreme court sleeper agents did this to us!! REEEEE!!"
/r/MensRights12/05/22 09:29 AM
1

Banned & Censored because a feminist feels justified. loud support whenever a feminist feels entitled. GTFO.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 09:25 AM
6

Feminists are supremacists. IMO the most telling behavior is their conclusion to every gender disparity- If men aren't coming 2nd, they're cheating.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 09:18 AM
3

I identify as a woman, see you Thursday!
/r/MensRights12/05/22 09:15 AM
2

If I were an alien, studying human languages, I would have to assume that all the "Ist" and "phobe" words all mean "Disobedient" based on the context in which they are thrown around.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 03:32 PM
1

Its your gender role to be a provider and protector of women. She was just mad that you were straying too far from your reason for existing on this earth.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 03:25 PM
1

I'm going to combine 1 and 3 into "People face unique issues in society and a lot of their concerns are valid" But... It's hard to say exactly how "valid" various people's concerns are. They may have been embellished, or diminished, they may have been researched and presented in a maliciously skewed fashion. There may even be ulterior motive to over-representation of victimhood. It would be great to blow away the fog of artificial stigmas and agendas. and say, Everything is valid, and everything…
/r/MensRights11/05/22 03:17 PM
1

Some laws discriminate against men through gendered language. Gender neutral laws, on the other hand.... Will be applied selectively.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 01:15 PM
13

Saying 'All Men [horrible crime]' is an attempt to make us all feel responsible. To place us all In Debt to them. Because too many people are controlled by guilt. Just like the best scams, it doesn't have to work on everybody. feminists Run it on enough people and they get a return big enough to keep the operation going. Even if the majority of people see the con. Victimhood makes other people compliant, Victimhood is Influence and Influence is better than Power. 'Power' is owning your own socia…
/r/MensRights11/05/22 01:04 PM
2

Yes. We all must be careful not to assume any group CANT be a victim or is too "privileged" to suffer inequality. Those assertions are nothing short of maliciously oppressive.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 09:14 PM
3

It doesn't matter how many times we clearly state we want equality with women. No matter how many posts of paternity fraud or stories of a man being forced by law into parenthood we share, we'll ALWAYS be treated as if we're just saying "ABorTIon bAD!" Fine. Let's do it one more time, with feeling. If mothers have safe haven surrender laws, why cant fathers? Freaking the fuck out, about the state forcing choices onto you is a perfectly valid concern. Our "bad take" is its STILL a valid concern e…
/r/MensRights07/05/22 06:27 AM
2

I would say 60-70% of what MRAs want is "please stop forcing your decisions onto me" with the remainder being "please treat the decisions I make for myself, with respect" "Can I force others to do as I command?" is a totally alien category.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 06:12 AM
38

Its funny that the lawmakers had a clear understanding of what to do, and who to lock up when the man removes BC. But then had a head scratching session on what to do when a Woman does the exact same thing. Come on Justice system, you can do this! Which party is the criminal, when the Woman's the criminal? You can use your crayons if that helps you work it out.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 01:19 PM
3

The feminist logic for proving the wage gap, is a 1001 tiny, unquantifiable effects, that culminate in nebulous, uncertain outcomes that result in less money for women. the feminist SOLUTION is to "GiB mEN lESs MOneYS!!"
/r/MensRights06/05/22 11:20 AM
2

They give that look knowing they had a bag of tricks and were so confident it couldn't fail because at least one person would buy it. This is so true and we see it happening in various 'scales' when feminists want a particular outcome. Its how cancel culture* works. Whether you're making your own video game or just a tweet. you depend on multiple platforms, and all it takes is ONE of those dependencies to fall for the victim card, suspend their service and you can no longer functionally reach yo…
/r/MensRights06/05/22 08:28 AM
15

As far as virtuous masks to hide overt evil intents go, the "Disinformation Governance Board" is right up there with "We only want equality"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/22 08:13 AM
-5

Came in here to make a very similar comment! It's becoming clearer to everyone that 'Sex' is the feminist's ONLY bargaining chip. Imagine how our society would change if that currency were devalued.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 08:08 AM
1

You have every right to come to your own preferences. You should be suspicious of anyone trying to inject themselves into your decision making process. On stereotypes - fully believing and committing to them is an absolutist position to take JUST LIKE entirely dismissing them. If your observations are free, then the red flags you use to make better decisions are valid.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 08:00 AM
12

You can't look at slogans like "my body my choice!" or "no uterus, no opinion" as if they are good faith philosophies, meant to be applied consistently. They are disposable, throw away lines to get what the feminist wants right now, and tomorrow they will laugh at you for asking if this applies when you want fairness as well.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/22 07:49 AM
115

They do go to jail but to reflect the shorter sentences they leave jail by rolling 2 dice and scoring any number lower that 13
/r/MensRights05/05/22 08:46 PM
39

Community chest! Society gives a crap about your cancers, collect $50 from each player in research funding.
/r/MensRights05/05/22 08:43 PM
4

And if Musk wasn't currently buying out twitter, that hashtag would have been quietly throttled into the dirt.
/r/MensRights05/05/22 02:22 PM
6

Women are human beings, men are human doings.
/r/MensRights05/05/22 01:37 PM
3

People should not be forced to carry other people's decisions.
/r/MensRights05/05/22 08:03 AM
3

The comparison should indeed be to safe haven laws instead of abortion. Forced child support is akin to slave labor, also the unilateral decision making portion of the situation also adds a "Taxation without representation" issue as well.
/r/MensRights05/05/22 07:53 AM
7

The seriousness of the procedure should not be the issue. Performing any unnecessary procedure on an infant that cannot consent, being an okay thing to do "Because boy" is the issue. I would ask, who are you concerned about, where a man might "abuse" the right to Legal Paper Paternal Abortion Surrender? End conscription, no being forced into jobs you don't want. Conscript women is more of a "how would you like it?" device.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 02:05 PM
1

Although not as sad as believing propaganda and misinformation can only come from one place...
/r/MensRights04/05/22 12:22 PM
1

bye then.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 11:39 AM
5

Look how many people still believe the feminist propaganda about history. its really sad.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 11:37 AM
2

Can't talk about oppression? That's oppression.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 11:25 AM
6

Also, Once all of these criteria are met, what do we get out of it from this OP?
/r/MensRights04/05/22 11:16 AM
3

We're all equals, but some equals can weaponize the state against you by simply making noises with their food hole.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/22 09:56 AM
5

What is the value of this area of academia, if it is not only incorrect, but belligerently incapable of self correction? The outcomes are at best, wrong and at worst, maliciously misleading. I believe the way forward in these instances is not to argue right or wrong of the figures (because you have established that they are wrong) but instead ask why are these incorrect figures valued? What incompetence in research lead to the incorrect figure? Why are such large systems of power lying about the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/22 09:47 AM
2

You know how bad it must really be, if even the feminist narrative is willing to accept SOME of the blame...
/r/MensRights04/05/22 02:48 AM
2

Also. Can anybody imagine how a feminist would react to being told that innocent women having their lives wrecked by somebody weaponizing the state is perfectly fine because 10% is a low enough figure? She'd be tearing her hair out by the neon fistful, and rightfully so.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 05:02 PM
1

If you want to increase the population of SAs for statistics and infographics purposes, all you need do is close your eyes, spin around and point a finger and state your accusation. But, If you want to increase the population of "False Accusers" you have to (depending on jurisdiction) Make your SA accusation, have the DA take your case to court, fail to get a conviction, so badly that it brings your motives into question, AGAIN have the DA willing to prosecute YOU for perverting the course of ju…
/r/MensRights03/05/22 03:51 PM
2

When speaking with feminists, so many people know the framing is biased, they know the stats are garbage and they know what crap arguments to look out for but for some reason think they would never lie or misrepresent history.. WHY?
/r/MensRights03/05/22 02:29 PM
14

It will be bad. The mrm will be treated like patriarchal oppressors. The very worst arguments and takes will be clipped and shared from every feminist roof top. Our trolls will switch, on a dime, from asking "But what has the MRM actually accomplished?" to shouting "You and your supreme court buddies did this to us!!" But asking will this be good or bad for us, is like wondering what will set off an abusive partner - Everything Does! Save your best behavior for people who appreciate it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/22 12:50 PM
3

Abortion made a states issue... 6 months before what WAS shaping up to be a catastrophe for the Dems in the midterms. Well played.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 11:58 AM
4

I am seeing more and more that average people are rejecting a lot of feminist rhetoric. Their insistence of Zero Victims among men, for example. These ordinary people who would never openly call themselves MRAs are calling out feminism's double standards of acceptable behavior. If I were a feminist who noticed that dissent of my self serving madness is no longer neatly contained to "the manosphere" I think I might run screaming in terror to the hills...
/r/MensRights03/05/22 11:42 AM
3

To see who rules over you, find out who you can't question. The new Ministry of Truth will show us in 4k detail.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 10:51 AM
0

Stoke the dem outrage ready for the midterms, with a supreme Court "leak" Feminist feels are as safe as kittens. Nobody's taking anything away from that protected class.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 06:40 AM
7

But don't worry, she's not a 'real' feminist. The real ones are in this sub with 1 day old accounts - so that's lucky for some reason that I'm not sure I understand.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 08:29 PM
3

Agreed. Imagine any supremacist group, with their hate filled conspiracy theories... and add mainstream media applause on top. That's where we are. Also while we're at it, falsely accusing a man of SA should be a hate crime as well. As it targets a group based on gender, which is a protected characteristic, just like race or sexual orientation etc.
/r/MensRights01/05/22 09:07 PM
22

It very clearly shows the world that hoarding victimhood is more important than seeking the truth, to these feminists.
/r/MensRights01/05/22 05:59 AM
9

We may only seek gender equality... where it does not upset certain protected classes. Great.
/r/MensRights01/05/22 05:56 AM
1

Recognise the men falsely accused of rape as victims of a specific crime under the law. (Currently the charges are wasting police time and perverting the course of justice, it is only the state that is officially the victim when a man is falsely accused)
/r/MensRights30/04/22 09:28 PM
2

Same here. After 3 attempts, I had to kind of, mentally force the word I was reading to be about extortion.
/r/MensRights30/04/22 09:14 PM
24

Peevish passive aggression in the name of the company. Nice. Watch out for those equal opportunity hiring laws, there's a chance they might even be applied to you.
/r/MensRights30/04/22 09:06 PM
45

There's no facet of discussion safe from these opportunistic liars. And forgive this side note rant, but It amazes me that some intelligent people who consider themselves red pilled, will see through the claims, see through the faulty statistics, see through the dishonest framing and word manipulation but still believe women were historically oppressed - based on FEMINISM'S version of history.
/r/MensRights30/04/22 08:14 AM
15

When a study fails to substantiate the claims of a protected class, you look for another study. Compare the library of methodologies and approaches the pay gap continues to go through, with the approaches applied to the education gap. Simple study shows boys behind girls and the response is /shrug I enjoy reminding the pay gap zealots that HR departments are mostly filled with women employees and they have the access to see exactly how much everyone gets paid - so where are the stunning and brav…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/22 05:41 AM
11

No mention of how people can avoid being served, no mention of how this time wasting tactic can pay off. An article filled with deafening silences. Feminist attitudes treat women as 'Winners' or 'Victims' depending on the outcomes.
/r/MensRights29/04/22 02:04 PM
8

of the 11 total paragraphs, 1 paragraph was spent noting that the alleged incident did not take place and 1 more saying she was arrested, and 7 PARAGRAPHS were spent variously coddling women, reassuring them that they are safe from attack and will absolutely be believed, with 2 contact methods given for reporting any false accusations they might have in future. As ever, the men who's lives were potentially ruined by a woman's near successful attempt to weaponize the state, are not treated like v…
/r/MensRights29/04/22 01:33 PM
11

If a tree falls in the woods but its not reported on, did it really happen? Megan Rapinoe sued for equal pay for female soccer players, to great, deafening fanfare from the media. The court's investigation revealed that female soccer players ALREADY DO get paid more than their male counterparts ("for doing the exact same job") when you consider all their benefit packages and flexibilities Barely a peep of this humiliating loss and fascinating revelation into the pay gap myth made the rounds on t…
/r/MensRights29/04/22 12:09 PM
13

Okay everyone! you can ignore feminists referring to suffragette era voting rights, domestic abuse laws, pay gaps of older generations because that all happened more than 11 years ago. And we all know what stalwart champions of consistency these people are, so you can take that to the bank.
/r/MensRights29/04/22 10:28 AM
15

and the MSM would then of course blame 'red pill culture.' and 'the manosphere'
/r/MensRights29/04/22 10:14 AM
29

There'd also be a year long awareness campaign, Google doodles, hashtag movements, promotional ice cream flavors and politicians condemning and speaking out.
/r/MensRights29/04/22 06:32 AM
2

I want to do a series of memes about the JD/AH case like the picture of the turd on a bed with the label "My reserve in belivingAllWomen" with an arrow pointing to the bed, and "Amber Heard" pointing to the poop. There's a video floating around reddit, girl steps off of elevator and punches and beats a guy as he walks without defending himself down a corridor. Again with the labels "My unshaking duty to BelieveAllWomen" over the guy and "Amber Heard" over his violent attacker. Also I've seen a v…
/r/MensRights28/04/22 01:12 PM
9

Pretending some group are incapable of evil, defers costs for immediate gains In the short term they merrily get away with more abuses of power. But in the long run, track records of behavior start piling up and eventually overtake and overwhelm whatever mechanism grants the mask of infallibility, and when they are caught red handed, they are not only treated as guilty of whatever they were caught doing, BUT ALSO of being despicable, manipulative liars on top of that. And if you stop the pretens…
/r/MensRights28/04/22 12:55 PM
5

Feminists are a protected class. They don't have to make the arguments that would garner an audience the honest way. They don't have to be correct about their absurd world views. They don't have to apologize or fix their ideas, when they are proven wrong or exposed as hypocritical. and they don't have to hide what censorious, manipulative authoritarians they are.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 12:10 PM
1

What's the matter, feminist lobby groups? Can't get an audience the honest way, based on the merit and principle of your arguments? Platform must be broken, its the only explanation... There's so much cultural demand for attention from feminists, SJWs etc. You HAVE to watch feminist content, you HAVE to watch various agendas in movies and tv shows or you're branded a hateful bigot!!1!1!!!. But that's not enough for these authoritarians, because they ALSO assume the authority to control your capa…
/r/MensRights28/04/22 11:51 AM
35

That's really interesting. St_Korihor was making a prediction on later action, but you responded with "Or Maybe" as if they gave a reason for the for mentioned subreddit's silence. Almost as if you're quite aware of the simplest and most obvious reason for those crickets and you're running cover for it with excuses.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 10:07 AM
90

Platforms and companies take action for women's equality wherever and whenever the slightest possibility presents itself. But action is only taken for men's equality when continued Inaction becomes embarrassing to the platform. Next time you see a small win for men, ask yourself. Did the change come about because the policy maker felt a duty of fairness, or because their mistake was becoming embarrassing?
/r/MensRights28/04/22 07:43 AM
2

Nothing destroys male dominated patriarchy theory than watching a handful of feminists change the 'accepted' definitions of words whenever it suits them.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 07:38 AM
10

The expectations of politically correct professionalism, clearly don't apply to everybody. Imagine guys having a chuckle at a funny video of female footballers? Its not the joke that's so disgusting, its the double standard.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 02:07 PM
6

If the Internet did not exist, this story would not be in the news. Selective coverage would take care of it. The particulars of this case give it an element of undeniability. JD's fame, DV coming from a woman AND she's a false accuser, for example make it too anti-establishment to turn away from. I think, however, that the post case silence and calm will be much more traditionally exploitable. The memory hole is the most likely outcome, but feminist activists USING the Depp case as a platform t…
/r/MensRights27/04/22 06:49 AM
6

How can we educate you on how to kill fewer children? We're just trying to help you.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 06:19 AM
3

Uh, oh... Men are being correct about stuff. I better start constructing my own artificial "win/lose" conditions to negate the outcomes I don't like...
/r/MensRights27/04/22 06:04 AM
4

Sounds great. Just to clarify. A portrait picture of AH with the caption: "[Hashtag]BelieveAllWomen" ?
/r/MensRights26/04/22 03:12 PM
3

"Women are wonderful" and "male disposability" all wrapped up in one perfect storm of a shitty situation. status quo Policy makers would have to overcome multiple layers of ingrained gynocentrism to correct injustices like this. Every step would be like pulling teeth. Its no wonder all we hear is a hurried and muffled "uhh wahh, err, Child's best interest.. uhh..umm, Leave me alone!" before the heads are rammed back into the sand again.
/r/MensRights26/04/22 01:43 PM
2

Account already suspended? Good luck with OneWithTheStripes4
/r/MensRights26/04/22 01:27 PM
4

"Lying makes me less believable, something must be done about this!" The absolute state of feminism.
/r/MensRights26/04/22 12:00 PM
94

There was a bc method for men a while back. The tests found suicide was a side effect and the trial was stopped. Feminists had a tantrum claiming suicide was an acceptable side effect and that men are just "fragile" A new simple bc method for men is in the works and so far there are no side effects. I have zero doubt that feminists will once again be singing us the songs of their people about it.
/r/MensRights26/04/22 06:45 AM
1

There will come a point where men who are not getting anything out of the society they pay so much into, will walk away and build their own. To the shocked pikachu faces of those who need them to stay and serve.
/r/MensRights26/04/22 06:35 AM
1

Patriarchy never existed. Feminism ONLY looks at the issues women face. And insist men never suffer. They believe their own biased research and conclude that there must be some sort of conspiracy. Upholding this theory leads to more biased research into issues that only affect women. During more dangerous feudal times, women demanded chivalry - women needed protection and men had to provide it. In safer, more recent times we see feminists demanding equal outcomes and men have to provide that too…
/r/MensRights26/04/22 06:00 AM
43

The mainstream media are just MORE feminists. The biggest lie the MSM will tell you is that they are just an impartial back drop to conversation, but the reality is their selective reporting makes them the single biggest instigators and perpetuators for the stigmas, public attitudes and biases that men face.
/r/MensRights25/04/22 03:31 PM
1

I used to look at hypocrisy as evidence of a flawed world view/argument, but after so many examples, I now also see it as evidence of a protected class. These people are as hateful and as bigoted as the selective Application of the rules allows them to be.
/r/MensRights25/04/22 03:10 PM
3

There is so much territory to explore and ideas to get in to. But its all off-limits outside what is considered strictly morally good. Its a wall that keeps us in this area where no more answers can be found. Tear it down, or at the very least, show me what prizes we win for being the nicest people on the internet.
/r/MensRights25/04/22 02:42 PM
2

While open discussion is encouraged and welcomed, there should be consequences for trolls. And not just "trolls" Nobody here should have to tolerate people playing the victim card in order to exert influence over people or to shut down debate. its manipulative, its controlling its mental abuse - You would break off a toxic relationship for it, why the hell are you putting up with it from strangers?
/r/MensRights25/04/22 02:34 PM
3

What fascinates me the most, is making the platform open-source. Transparency reveals more bias, enough highlighted bias embarrasses platforms into change.
/r/MensRights25/04/22 02:19 PM
3

Yeah. Depp Loses? the manosphere has to close down, all men can never ever be considered victims of DV/DA ever again. And all women's testimony is regarded as utterly incontestable until the heat death of the universe. Depp Wins? Well, the case wasn't about that so, absolutely nothing needs to change.
/r/MensRights25/04/22 12:11 PM
1

He said everyone is in the same boat. And then protected class zealots that can't be engaged with, twisted that into "hE'S AttAckIng WoMEn!!1!!" I just wanted to thank you for proving his point, before you head off to make your new account - discoFever1092
/r/MensRights25/04/22 11:47 AM
1

Yeah, guys! Who are you going to believe? Feminism's own press releases or your lying eyes?
/r/MensRights25/04/22 10:53 AM
2

I agree with what you're saying, I think we're one slight mental tweak away from getting somewhere really interesting. Feminists have nothing to win by debating, they hold more power and can easily shut you down This, 100% ​ If they debate in a free, fair, open, and respectful way then they risk having their lies exposed... Totally on board. ​ ...and losing power. No. It doesn't happen often but talking head feminists will enter into high profile debates and make utter fools of themselves, they …
/r/MensRights25/04/22 10:32 AM
6

The big culprits for accommodating the frauds are the tech monopolies, Hollywood, Main Stream Media and large corporations. They are relatively few individual policy makers but when they fall for the roof top emotional manipulations, they do it on a massive scale And their naiveite is suffered by Hundreds and Hundreds of Millions of much smarter people, who don't get a say in the unfolding obvious con. Its the equivalent of Mark Zuckerberg handing over YOUR life savings because he got an email f…
/r/MensRights25/04/22 09:47 AM
2

What I'm seeing a lot of right now is "they're both as bad as each other" but reverse the genders and nobody would care for any more nuance than "woman victim - man bad!!"
/r/MensRights25/04/22 06:45 AM
1

Heads up. Feminists got some gender roles for us to conform to!
/r/MensRights25/04/22 05:37 AM
111

A whight Knight once told me "not all feminists are like that!" AND "If you're not part if the problem, then feminists aren't talking about you" in a single reply. White knights and feminists don't actually need fair and open debate. Feminism is a protected class, they don't have to be correct. It's why claims like the wage gap get debunked over and over again, but the pay gap slogans and banners remain the same. It's why no matter how much evidence there is of near parity in Dv victims by gende…
/r/MensRights24/04/22 09:04 PM
4

It's always a tangle where feminists and nazis are brought into the same conversation. But we can all agree that they truly are the worst. With their marches and their hateful speeches about their global conspiracy theories, scapegoating all of society's issues onto one handy category of people, they view as inferior. And the nazis are just as bad.
/r/MensRights24/04/22 08:39 AM
4

People should get help and support if mistreated. Mistreatment should be researched in good faith.
/r/MensRights24/04/22 08:28 AM
10

Inexcusable, intolerant hate speech is a mere subject swap away from being stunning & brave acts of empowerment. Good to know.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/22 05:05 AM
1

Confused members of a protected class, baffled as to why people would have to support their arguments with statistics and facts.
/r/MensRights23/04/22 09:15 PM
3

Surely it would work the other way too. If a man had to be offered sex to get his money, then its theft. But it wouldn't be feminism if its consistent
/r/MensRights23/04/22 02:09 PM
3

Yes. Opologies to all for the confusion. Feminists lie about wanting "equality" and you would think that a lie that holds such a massive grip over our society would need SOME effort on feminists part to maintain. Some alibi, some token piece of evidence to keep the fallacy alive. But no. Just claiming it is apparently enough.
/r/MensRights23/04/22 09:08 AM
2

Absolutely! They'll lie outright to our faces that they "want equality for all, including men" WHILE instituting and maintaining misandrist, discriminatory language in laws. The lie is nothing but empty words. There's no leg work put into it at all.
/r/MensRights23/04/22 09:02 AM
4

Feminists just want equality, you guys... How does Anybody fall for that lie? ZERO effort is put into maintaining this fallacy. Everywhere you look at the behavior of feminists it's just wall to wall selectively outraged, emotionally manipulative, self serving frauds! I mean, I might understand if there were some feminist action somewhere being done for the inequalities that men face. Some token, some pantomime of feigned interest. But there's nothing! The feminist protective mask of "we only wa…
/r/MensRights23/04/22 05:31 AM
19

The court system might bestow upon men a Presumtion of Innocence. The court of public opinion, however, bestows upon women an Insistance of Innocence.
/r/MensRights22/04/22 06:55 AM
15

Well said. I look back at the incredible amount of effort spent on dating in my youth. I often wonder where would I be if I could get even a fraction of that energy back. What would our world be like if that energy could be saved across a whole generation of young men.
/r/MensRights22/04/22 06:50 AM
79

If Depp gets even a hint of justice out of all this, I expect the news cycle to suddenly become chock full of battered women abuse stories to course correct this unfortunate lapse in narrative.
/r/MensRights21/04/22 08:48 PM
4

Welcome debate. Engage in good faith exchange of ideas and sourced arguments. BUT when their protected class shutters come crashing down, its time to show them the door.
/r/MensRights21/04/22 08:38 PM
2

Not to be a cynic or anything.... but is there any point in asking who's framing of "best" we are discussing?
/r/MensRights21/04/22 08:10 PM
5

It couldn't have been an attack, as women NEVER do that and men aren't capable of being victims so the shoe MUST HAVE been a gift.
/r/MensRights21/04/22 01:43 PM
3

I have often found stories of historical oppression to be paper thin. A pop-culture veneer of "men bad, women victims" that reveals a world of grey areas and floods of missing contexts when lightly scratched. Hell, if I can't trust the MSM to tell me about events that occurred this week, how can I trust the framing of events 50, 60, 150 years ago?
/r/MensRights21/04/22 08:56 AM
11

Anything that makes men difficult to influence will be demonized. Broke and alone? Nothing to lose or to threaten Mgtow? independence and self reliance. If any power system is impossible or too difficult to influence then it is seen as tyrannical. If it can be influenced too easily then does it really still have 'power'? Men are treated the same way.
/r/MensRights21/04/22 08:35 AM
16

Well, on the one hand we have Heard admitting to abuse on tape. But on the other hand, she has a vagina. So you can see how tricky this situation is.
/r/MensRights21/04/22 08:20 AM
7

He was approached by Gender studies professors Academics
/r/MensRights21/04/22 08:18 AM
12

Depp accused? Fire him, believe all women, case closed, Don't believe anyone "Muddying the waters" AH accused? Well, there's layers to explore, nuance to discuss, lets not be hasty...
/r/MensRights21/04/22 08:14 AM
12

It's never "As simple as that" when men are the victims, yet is is ALWAYS "As simple as that" when women are.
/r/MensRights21/04/22 08:06 AM
2

Protected class is protected.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/22 08:20 PM
10

Are there any gender disparities, where men come out ahead BUT feminists are not concerned about correcting it? Are there any gender disparities, where WOMEN come out ahead and feminists DO want to correct it? Feminists have been around a long time. Long enough to leave a track record of observable behavior. And it's a lot uglier than their claims and definitions.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 08:19 PM
8

When men suffer hardships, feminist doctrine blames men (toxicity/fragility etc) And on the other hand, when men enjoy success and achievement, feminist doctrine blames men (patriarchy/privilege) I'm expecting feminism to start robustly interrogating women's actions and behaviors any day now...
/r/MensRights18/04/22 12:49 PM
1

Tap the spoiler box.
/r/MensRights18/04/22 08:45 AM
9

There's actually a lot of patience and acceptance for male only groups right now... In Ukraine
/r/MensRights18/04/22 06:39 AM
32

If men don't need their own spaces, neither do female athletes.
/r/MensRights17/04/22 05:44 PM
17

The entire movement relies on exploiting the good natured.
/r/MensRights16/04/22 10:00 AM
1

Nobody is stopping men from having agency. That's their problem.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 01:23 PM
1

Is that because heterosexuality places a standard on women. Which, of course, they can't stand?
/r/MensRights15/04/22 10:43 AM
2

Feminists problem is that men have agency. Its not that they don't recognise men's agency. It's that they straight up can't stand men HAVING agency. Like a thin girl? You're fat-phobic. Like a curvier girl? You're fetishizing. Have ANY opinion on tits and ass? You're objectifying women. It all comes down to a hatred of your freedom to develop any kind of preference. Choosing for yourself in any context gives you power. Feminists will sing you the song of their people.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 09:37 AM
2

Yes, but I'm working on it.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 09:58 PM
4

Male characters are treated like incompetent children BUT are still complained about for being Machiavellian co-conspirators.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 07:58 AM
10

OMG, These are our journalists. Whether via Incompetency or Malice, they are worthless. Is there even any point in writing back, pointing out their blindness of male victims of biased laws?
/r/MensRights14/04/22 07:43 AM
1

Contrary to feminist teaching, Women are not perfect, infallible victims floating 2 feet above the rest of us. Their every word, the truth and the light. Its why we have justice systems based on evidence. Because any PERSON might tell the occasional untruth about their involvement in crimes. ​ "Believe" is a very loose term, weaponized like so many other loose terms. I want a clear list of expectations, participants and timeframes attached to the special treatment demand of "Believe All Women". …
/r/MensRights13/04/22 12:43 PM
32

I love these stories. Minority victims of violent crimes, minority victims of murder. The most pampered and pandered to class of people to ever walk the earth. It is not their safety but their FEELINGS of safety that are national news.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 09:53 AM
4

Male Suicide is 400% higher than women's. So by her logic we should be talking about that CONSTANTLY on the BIGGEST platforms on EVERY SCREEN - EVERYWHERE. Our biggest failure, is that we wait around for the approval of women. At some level we wait for women to green light our every decision. Reject your gender role and discuss the dude that killed himself. Discuss the lack of services available to male victims of DV. Discuss the women that get away with it. Discuss the pushback men face for try…
/r/MensRights13/04/22 08:31 AM
14

Bigotry and discrimination against men has to be so overt that it Embarrasses the Policy makers. That is the only way things change. Anything less than day-glow obvious gets reframed and re-contextualized until justified.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 08:09 AM
1

"In recognition of the steadfast support we have received from the MRM on this issue, we will proudly use all powers at our disposal to help the MRM, now that they face injustice" -No Feminist Ever.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 08:02 AM
57

I know a TERF IRL 10 years ago, she was all about dismantling and invading men's spaces, playing the victim card to force attention to feminist issues. Denying outright that men are capable of suffering. etc etc. But Now... She complains about Trans women invading women's spaces and seethes at how emotionally manipulative they are when they play the victim card to draw attention to their issues, and how they don't realize that women are suffering... All of this without a shade of self awareness …
/r/MensRights13/04/22 07:43 AM
1

Too young to get a tattoo? Too young to get a sex change.
/r/MensRights10/04/22 03:55 PM
15

Could get a crowd together to protest by stumbling down into the tube blindfolded? Get in the way, need a lot of assistance. Wear t-shirts and hats that say how fair and wonderful the no stare rules are. Or protest by getting a bunch of people together to MASS accuse EVERYONE of staring. Women, men, ticket staff, the police that come to arrest everyone. And push each accusation through the system. Demand they take each and every one seriously.
/r/MensRights09/04/22 03:04 PM
7

Feminists can either make better, more valid observations of the world, backing up their positions with principled, consistent arguments... Or they can tear down anyone who challenges their bullshit. It's just a question of what feminist privilege can afford.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 10:26 PM
1

That is good news, thanks for that.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 01:20 PM
2

Misogyny! That's the only reason why this perfect infallible victim, floating two feet above the rest of us, was arrested!
/r/MensRights08/04/22 01:12 PM
16

'Rapist' as soon as accused, but 'False Accuser' only when courts make a ruling garbage numbers are garbage.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 12:58 PM
6

Engages in biased, selective study. -> Manufactures justification to continue engaging in biased, selective studies. Hay, do you think there might be something wrong with the study methodology or are women the victims of a global conspiracy?
/r/MensRights08/04/22 10:16 AM
2

There's great links in these comments. But showing women have more power will be met with 1 of 2 following reactions. ​ Dismissal - "No, that doesn't count because reasons." Praise for the status quo - "Well of course women should hold more power in X situation... Because reasons" Always bare in mind, that feminist slogans and banners don't get amended after decades of feminists losing debates. "Men holding more power" is one small manipulatively framed argument within a larger picture of femini…
/r/MensRights08/04/22 09:52 AM
27

So, for whatever reason its mandatory at birth. Near birth divorce rates would spike, from dads who find out they're not the dad. Child support court judgements would continue to be wildly biased and we would see in many cases that the proven non-father would still have to pay. These stories would not be picked up by the Main Stream Media who would quietly overlook, just another inequality that men face. At First. This bias would however be overt and brazen enough to sufficiently embarrass polic…
/r/MensRights08/04/22 08:04 AM
11

Pussy pass: Engage!
/r/MensRights07/04/22 08:59 PM
23

The internet did not bring about an "age of information" but instead an "Age of information Providers" along with their baggage and their agendas. The information and news stories that you're passively fed are distinctly different from the info you have to actively seek out.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 01:51 PM
3

I would like to create content that gender flips a lot of tropes, just to hear the howling of the selectively outraged.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 01:34 PM
1

They don't like reality and either luckily or very unluckily, nobody can force them to take part.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 01:12 PM
3

They won't broach ANY subject unless they already have a "its men's fault" excuse, locked and loaded.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 12:56 PM
5

His accuser was the same old opportunist that shows up so often in these false accusation stories. Has a SO, has consensual sex with someone else then claims 'Rape' to keep their relationship intact. The worst part of all of these stories is the disposability with which they view the accused. Destroying their entire lives so callously, just to save face makes me sick to my stomach. The University "investigation" on the other hand was down right predatory. It was simply a blind exercise in "Belie…
/r/MensRights07/04/22 12:22 PM
5

Women/girls behind in any disparity? "BURN DOWN THE WORLD TO FIND THE REASON WHY!" Men/boys behind? 'Meh'
/r/MensRights07/04/22 11:00 AM
7

Ahh, at its root, this is another one of those inescapable privileges that favor women. So therefore will be redefined, bent and reframed to escape acceptance.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 10:51 AM
89

There's an almost schizophrenic disconnect between their claims and their behavior, as you point out with - She denies 'true feminism' is about hating men, but constantly describes men as being awful people, who need to change. We see similar things with arguments with the infiltrators to this group. From the loftiest author to the lowliest troll, this seems to be a universal behavior. in one argument I asserted that feminism erases and denies inequalities against men, she demanded examples, the…
/r/MensRights07/04/22 10:21 AM
2

This is the honest voice kept secret at the heart of every feminist. The double barrel blast of "Women Deserve" and "Men Should"
/r/MensRights07/04/22 08:58 AM
6

We're bred and taught to be Providers, in fact the social conditioning is so strong that we feel an immense sense of Heresy at the concept of providing for ourselves. I saw a topic, quite similar to yours on r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates. The thought was too rich for their blood and the post was shut down. They simply couldn't examine a topic, even a little detached from "Moral Orthodoxy". It was the only post on that sub that I have commented on, and it got censored - way to disprove the stereotype g…
/r/MensRights07/04/22 08:40 AM
2

*Exterior, Steven Crowder is sitting at a folding table* Pregnancy is "Man-flu" for women. Change my mind.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 07:58 AM
275

After how long does a glance become a stare? How do you quantify a "sexual nature"? What evidence will a woman have to provide to support her accusation? What evidence will a Man have to provide to support his accusation?
/r/MensRights06/04/22 12:41 PM
4

One of feminism's most undeserved privileges is being surrounded by people who want to behave better than they do. GATE KEEP NOW!
/r/MensRights05/04/22 12:28 PM
9

Feminist hatred towards different groups, creates a fascinating 'heat map' of where their most uncomfortable topics may be found.
/r/MensRights05/04/22 12:24 PM
3

My personal favorite is- "1st of all, are you good looking enough to listen to?"
/r/MensRights05/04/22 12:09 PM
1

The "We Only Want Equality" claim, with extra steps. Your failure to understand is based on your selective framings and definitions.
/r/MensRights05/04/22 11:58 AM
2

Arguing with feminist? I must be in a Men's rights space.
/r/MensRights05/04/22 09:54 AM
4

If we lived in a patriarchy - Finding articles debunking feminist philosophy would be the easiest thing in the world.
/r/MensRights05/04/22 09:48 AM
1

Yes, "Patriarchy" (and "Toxic Masculinity") are phrases designed to shut down conversations on important issues. We can't discuss male suicide being 400% higher for men, and the why's and the how's behind it because the conversation is forcibly redirected to discuss "Toxic Masculinity" instead. We can't use simple math or real world observations to either raise awareness of inequality or debunk claims. Because its all conveniently hand waived with "Yes, but Patriarchy" We might live in a "Patria…
/r/MensRights05/04/22 09:45 AM
6

HR departments have access to payroll data, to exactly how much every employee is paid. HR depts ALSO happen to have a majority of female employees. So where are the whistle blowers? Where is the definitive, smoking gun evidence of pay discrimination? Its all bullshit ideology, built on fraudulent math. But that's feminism. Loses the debates, but Keeps the slogans.
/r/MensRights05/04/22 09:15 AM
4

Good or bad, that's a debate for AFTER the selective application is resolved.
/r/MensRights05/04/22 09:08 AM
2

He slapped Chris Rock because JPS put him up to it with a look. A manipulative woman was the cause of the slap.
/r/MensRights05/04/22 08:51 AM
6

SSsshhh! We might find that a women is at fault and is even privileged. So stop looking into it! He just died, nothing to see here, move along!
/r/MensRights05/04/22 08:47 AM
50

On stories like this, I like to post a meme I made. image in 3 panes, 1st pane is the feminist meme of "Boys will be Boys" but the 2nd "boys" is crossed out and replaced with the phrase "Held accountable for their actions, just like girls are" 2nd pane is zoomed in and now only shows "Held accountable for their actions, just like girls are" 3rd pane is zoomed in even further and shows in sarcastic pixelated words "Just like girls are" I'll see if I can find it when I get home and share a link to…
/r/MensRights04/04/22 11:53 AM
-2

Can you give any examples of what people and in what way were they afraid of you?
/r/MensRights04/04/22 08:05 AM
7

That's just the special kind of "Patriarchy" we live in. /s Make no mistake. The clock is most certainly ticking on this sub as well. Make copies of all the evidence gathered here on various topics. Take the screenshots you need to take. If there is a community here, USE it to network, create things, organize etc. Doing anything when you "Have to" is too late.
/r/MensRights01/04/22 12:03 PM
17

The feminist belief is clear. Women are superior, and Men are not capable of outperforming them. Men can do worse than women. or Men are cheating. But that's not gender supremacism because reasons.
/r/MensRights01/04/22 10:51 AM
5

She told them he killed himself. They said GOOD, then she hung up and called the police,' Zyburt said. A friend of the victim was speaking with the criminals on the phone, not texting, not a message - SPEAKING with them. ​ No arrests have been made but the investigation is ongoing, police said. Don't strain anything, Sherlock.
/r/MensRights01/04/22 08:40 AM
46

I love how she starts her long epic with "Cause is Bigotry!" Then builds her whole delusional, Tolkienesque saga on it. With its fascinating maps and individual characters with their detailed family trees and mythological histories and languages. etc etc. Never has to prove the premise of course. Just a nebulous, emotionally evocative, non-disprovable claim. The Pay gap conspiracy is really simple. HR departments have two things. Access to see how much money each employee gets paid and a disprop…
/r/MensRights31/03/22 01:42 PM
10

Pure delusion, big claims, no evidence. There's no result that could force that person to face reality.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 01:08 PM
1

Oh, that's my point, they don't want power. Power comes with all that icky responsibility. Ew, no, gross! They would rather do things like influence large platforms and powerful structures into creating rules and protections for them, or in this specific case, Influence men into becoming violent for them, while they can sit back with clean Powerless hands.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 10:30 AM
1

Any crime involving a physical attack (or even the threat of an attack) is usually classified as an assault 2nd line of your own source. I can't believe the stupidity on display here. But I expand down voted clownery, I should expect these consequences.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 09:59 AM
3

"The Oscars was Slappy, but mostly peaceful."
/r/MensRights31/03/22 09:48 AM
0

"With great Power comes great responsibility!" Which is why feminist doctrine keeps quiet about influence.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 09:44 AM
24

I am absolutely shattered by two things. How shockingly little attention is given to a crisis so prevalent. And how very simple it has been to control and maintain that apathy with victim blaming and buzzwords.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 08:10 AM
3

I think we should be gatekeeping, pure and simple. Save the time and energy wasted on an ideology, that loses its debates but keeps its slogans Slight aside - Has anybody noticed the difference between a pointless argument with a feminist ally (male feminist) and a pointless argument with a feminist? ooooohh, its a totally different beast. There's just no mistaking the real deal. The ally will try to duck and weave past your logical points, before being utterly beaten and demoralized into walkin…
/r/MensRights30/03/22 02:54 PM
1

Yes, I agree. And that difference is gynocentrism.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 02:12 PM
6

A new day, a new fresh expectation of what men have to damn well provide. Who knows, what we will have to damn well provide, tomorrow?
/r/MensRights30/03/22 02:10 PM
4

It sounds like standards of logical argument, consistency and principle are not applied to the people that you are arguing with. I like to keep that in mind before I write my 2nd response to any of them. Make your statement, back it up, leave. Don't get drawn into pointless arguments with people who've spent 2 decades Losing their debates, but Keeping their slogans
/r/MensRights30/03/22 01:58 PM
1

You're clearly confused about what my words indicate, so I'll try again. Every gender disparity, according to the long track records of the supremacists you're defending, have only 2 explanations- Women come out on top, or men are cheating. That's supremacism.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 12:14 PM
41

I wonder if chivalry is just what entitled women wanted centuries ago. These women demanded protection and men had to damn well provide it for them. Now, because we live in relative safety, women demand Equal outcomes, and it's once again men's gender role to damn well provide that too.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 11:04 AM
3

The G.O.A.T.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 10:05 AM
2

Its a protected class. Their privileges don't come from speaking civilly or making cogent arguments. These are simply not standards that apply, and it shows.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 10:00 AM
8

It's also another example where proxy violence is just accepted - men commit the crimes for the women, on their behalf, while the women sit distanced from it with clean hands - this needs to stop, because the only people receiving consequences are the men involved. Ever thus. With great power, comes great responsibility... Which is why women like Jada prefer influence.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 09:44 AM
17

I realized my own unconscious gynocentrism over the Chris Rock joke. My initial thoughts were that Chris' Joke about Jada's condition crossed a line. I was mulling over the whole debacle after a day when the voice that's always playing devil's advocate chimed in with "Would you care if Rock's joke was aimed at a balding man?" And that really shocked me. I realized that Gynocentrism is not something that goes away once you're aware of it. You have to be constantly checking for it, in your initial…
/r/MensRights29/03/22 09:40 AM
1

Serious question. Why does a feminist have to worry about being correct, or accurate etc?
/r/MensRights28/03/22 08:21 PM
2

You have attempted to turn an observation about what feminism does to the living standards of "A people" into a discussion of personal examples. I am very lucky that I have not been dragged through the wild pro female biases of the family courts, or have been falsely accused of sexual assault, or have become a victim of domestic abuse at the hands of a female partner only to be treated as the attacker through the paradigms of the Duluth model. As I have no respect for your attempts at moving goa…
/r/MensRights28/03/22 02:39 PM
1

Settle. Accuse men of cheating. The only absurdity is thinking that those are the only two options.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 01:45 PM
2

I see a tipping point occurring when two very important things happen at the same time. 1- Someone of a Feminist critical viewpoint creates popular content. A book series, a movie or game franchise that articulates and lampoons the various issues. 2- Those content creators ensure their works cannot be censored. Through the use/invention of alternative platforms. That would burst the bubble.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 01:16 PM
2

Everyone here is so good at separating the terms "Feminist" from "Woman" (as it absolutely should be) Yet the complaints from those who should not be in this space, just blindly label everyone as misogynists and woman bashers. As time goes on it becomes more and more apparent that men are simply not what feminists accuse them of.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 01:08 PM
2

We should be gatekeeping. Feminist spaces wouldn't give you the time of day, they'd just ban you instantly. Why are we wasting time arguing with hateful, inconsistent, self serving, hypocrites? Can't we reject that Gender Role?
/r/MensRights28/03/22 12:59 PM
1

wherever men aren't coming 2nd in some gender disparity, the feminist conclusion is that men are 'cheating' or benefiting from some sort of unfairness. Feminists see themselves as superior to men by default.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 12:39 PM
1

It seems you can't shake a stick around here without finding one of those feminists, that we are routinely assured that not all feminists are like.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 12:22 PM
2

Because feminists are emotionally manipulative, self serving, dishonest frauds that lie about victim-hood just to garner influence. They can't overthrow something that does not exist, they can't usurp something that is not held. but they can vandalize the standard of living of a people who's suffering is constantly dismissed and erased.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 12:18 PM
11

I agree that conservatives don't actively pursue feminist causes. However, they tend to throw men under the buss any time a photo opportunity stands a chance of granting them a leg up among feminist voters.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 11:43 AM
1

Name calling a great way to change the subject. You make a good point You get called a name for it You then either abandon the conversation (feminists rejoice) or allow the topic to change to defending yourself/disproving the other person's accusation (feminists rejoice, once again) ​ Try instead, ignoring the ad hominem attack entirely and taking the opportunity to make your point AGAIN, HARDER. You can elaborate on it or articulate it differently, or expand on it etc They have literally grante…
/r/MensRights28/03/22 11:25 AM
6

It makes me wonder, how much research has been quietly binned over the years, when the results didn't fit the biases.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 09:56 AM
11

I'll hold my hand up. I don't believe feminism is a good faith ideology. But if I found myself in an argument with a feminist, I would not think I've won a debate by calling them a feminist. I would argue that feminism believes X, and X is disgusting for the following reasons.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 06:34 AM
3

I was going to wonder how much feminist ideology the support group pushes on the men that come to them. But if that were the case, they'd be getting a damn sight more than 4 measly thousand quid.
/r/MensRights27/03/22 08:35 PM
3

Indeed. They didn't like men controlling the imaginary patriarchy so they want to fix it by instituting an actual matriarchy
/r/MensRights27/03/22 05:08 PM
8

Too resistant.
/r/MensRights27/03/22 08:24 AM
26

I'd like to thank this feminist for admitting their ONLY problem with oppressive systems of power is who controls them.
/r/MensRights27/03/22 12:08 AM
14

Absolutely. Suggesting women self harm due to their own toxicity would be met with cries of Victim Blaming so fast your head would spin. From progressive cure all solution to inexcusable hate speech with nothing more than a gender flip. It's not a good faith ideology.
/r/MensRights26/03/22 11:44 PM
35

A lot of demands really boil down to "be more maliable"
/r/MensRights26/03/22 11:00 PM
1

In every decision, ask how much independence is there in it. Whether you're deciding on college, a career path, a wife, what color to paint the bathroom, whatever. What can you make for yourself that's hardest to take away?
/r/MensRights26/03/22 05:35 PM
1

Let's all try to remember, that feminism is a singular, cohesive monolith when we must heap praise upon them, but ten thousand disparate splinter cells when we call out fault.
/r/MensRights26/03/22 12:22 PM
2

This is wonderful news. I don't have a lot of info on paternity fraud. Does it mainly come from tampering with BC to steal DNA, or lying about who the father is? I see a men's bc pill helping with the 1st scenario, but not the second.
/r/MensRights26/03/22 12:13 PM
1

I like that version of society. that is you, me, my family, your family, our neighbors, it's everyone I want society to be that again. I don't want the shadier elements of hate speech laws, laws defined to specifically target one gender, taxes going to lopsided, biased social services. All of it can destroy you, NONE of it can be negotiated with. I find myself fascinated at the possibilities of what we could create together, if only we could be more efficient with our expenditure of effort.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 12:11 PM
9

Men call that a 'Tuesday'
/r/MensRights25/03/22 11:56 AM
2

There's two issues here. There's the impossible question of "Are our detractors, malicious or stupid?" I go back and fourth on this. One week I might look at feminism's implacable march through pop culture properties as malicious. But then I look at the standard of the writing and see how hopelessly incapable they are at getting and keeping an audience for any of their drivel. The second issue, I think there's a question of paths of least resistance to bettering society. Abandoning your gender r…
/r/MensRights25/03/22 11:44 AM
8

Through the miracle of technology. they can technically turn an ovum into a sperm cell and perpetuate their own society. ...Although I'm not sure they can do that in the dark while all the sewers are clogged. ;)
/r/MensRights25/03/22 11:20 AM
4

You've all done your dues researching topics, backing up your arguments and even winning various debates. You've shone a light on explicit evils with screen shots and video evidence to back it up. I see you maintaining the highest standards of behavior, hamstringing yourselves to be the nicest people on the internet, only to realize you're the only ones trying. Where has any of that got you? Respect your own agency in this, you HAVE tried everything else. Now try putting yourselves first. There'…
/r/MensRights25/03/22 11:06 AM
5

Ask a feminist how wide is the wage gap. Inform them that men work more hours. Wait for the feminist to claim that information is already taken into account. Ask them how wide the wage gap was BEFORE taking working hours into account. Walk away from a pointless conversation with an ideology that faces no requirement to be correct.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 04:38 PM
3

All of a sudden TERFS have a valid argument and are taking part in the discussion for saying things, the rest of us were banned for pointing out 10+ years ago. It makes me want to wash my hands of the whole topic.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 04:11 PM
1

I will just say that the state of women's sports is indeed unjust, but also a bed of feminism's own making. And I totally agree that some non-feminist women are paying for that and it sucks. Whenever I feel that I am expected to act one way or another or to hold a particular view on a particular high profile topic, I just ask myself "Who are you behaving for?" The answer is never pretty and it snaps me right out of it.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 04:02 PM
7

Have the studies found any effects on paternity fraud?
/r/MensRights24/03/22 02:47 PM
5

A word from the Feminist Dictionary. or "Fictionary" if you prefer that portmanteau...
/r/MensRights24/03/22 02:44 PM
18

I guess, its a choice between a party that doesn't care Vs a party that cares a great deal about making things worse.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 02:26 PM
9

Feminism is a supremacist ideology. Women outperforming men? no problem. Men outperforming women? Patriarchy! Oppression! Systemic Structures of Structural Systems! Because, according to these supremacists, every gender disparity has only two possible outcomes, men coming 2nd or men must be cheating somehow.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 02:24 PM
56

Ignore the sentiment, concentrate on the laughable double standards of the platform that allowed it.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 08:33 AM
5

Sanctioned evil. Disgusting.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 10:58 AM
2

Argument memory is approaching zero at an alarming rate!
/r/MensRights20/03/22 06:34 AM
3

I go to work, I keep my head down, my email responses short and polite and I get out at the end of the day. We simply don't have the freedom of expression to engage in any topic of conversation. My biggest fear is being flat out asked about any political virtue topic (feminism, blm, diversity etc.) I won't be able to fake a sanctioned establishment answer or smoothly leave the conversation
/r/MensRights20/03/22 01:00 AM
2

How is feminism a monolith when we should be finding ways to work with them, but a thousand fringe splinter cells when we observe fault? Can we have a movement like that? It would be awfully convenient.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 12:27 AM
2

Your issue around standards is subjective and is not an argument. Our attitude is objectively better than the one we would receive in feminist spaces.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 12:04 AM
2

Who did I strawman? Or have you hit the part of the conversation where you just start making blind claims and start ignoring the meanings of words? But whatever. Please keep showing everyone how you treat the patience of those that would never receive any in a feminist space.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 11:45 PM
2

Those perfect, infallible victims, floating two feet above the rest of us? Whose every utterance is the truth and the light? I go by the establishment standard when I congratulate myself on my superior attitude, thank you very much.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 10:52 PM
2

"Welcoming" is relative. If I went to a feminist space and told them that they're easily triggered, reactionary ass holes, who should stop shitting on MRAs- I. WOULD. BE. BANNED. (Unless, of course, I was already pre-banned for daring to comment here) Compared to that, you're on a red carpet.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 10:03 AM
2

The back and fourths you'd have with Dr. Persia Jamshidi would be Epic! You'd be trying to reconcile your observation that men are treated unfairly, with your religious upbringing that feminism cannot be questioned. While Jamshidi would be pointing out that the concept of "Patriarchy" is meant to shame and silence male victims of various inequalities. It would be great to see. Seriously, can we make that happen?
/r/MensRights19/03/22 09:23 AM
1

This is such a great example of "Why the left can't meme". Good memes share observations. The humour is accomplished instantly through recognition. Bad memes try to push a narrative. they try to convince you of something. In the time it takes for a bad meme to explain the joke to you, you could have laughed at 5 good memes.
/r/MensRights18/03/22 04:24 PM
4

I find that in conversations around DV, MRA's attempting to bring up men who suffer violence at the hands of their partners but keep defending themselves are shot down as there is no need to muddy the waters with "women's attempts" insisting that the bottom line of actual deaths is the only point that may be considered. Yet in discussions of male suicide...
/r/MensRights18/03/22 01:50 PM
4

I would find feminism less controversial/more believable if, there were any grey areas or variance in their findings, whatsoever. If, every now and again, they came out and said - "We have found that women's actions negatively impact men's lives in X,Y and Z ways, and in the interests of equality we will be challenging our own behavior on this." But when feminism, instead, fills its rhetoric with gleaming, black and white absolutism, they are making it perfectly clear that they are a 'conclusion…
/r/MensRights18/03/22 12:55 PM
8

Here, here. After looking at that video and many others like it, I want to ask - Where should our patience, our benefit of the doubt actually be, right now? Could someone paint me a picture? Considering that we're not even at gatekeeping our own spaces yet, I think we're doing pretty damn good!
/r/MensRights18/03/22 10:54 AM
11

Some does, some doesn't. Most of them [feminists] even recognize.... and And then some men get upset because apparently that means they're saying all men are rapists and we're being demonized. ​ "Not all feminists are like that!" and "If you're not the problem then feminists aren't talking about you!" IN ONE COMMENT.
/r/MensRights18/03/22 10:15 AM
4

Observation has begun its long uphill struggle against a life time of Explanation.
/r/MensRights18/03/22 10:08 AM
9

The men's right's movement should, on paper, be the left's flavour of the month. They are a minority, they see no positive representation on screen, they are excluded from various conversations by large systems of power. But the problem is, once the left has decided who is and isn't a marginalized voice, that decision NEVER gets re-examined. The left brands you an 'other' or declares your pronoun to be "Them" and that's that.
/r/MensRights18/03/22 10:00 AM
-1

I moved all my living room furniture out of the way, the other day. I took 2 massive handfuls of coins, I could barely keep hold of them all and I threw them in the air. They rained down and bounced and clattered all around me. When the last coin had rolled to a stop, I looked at what side was face up all around the room. And do you know what? They were ALL heads. Every last one. It was incredible! Well... I had to discount some for various reasons and I couldn't see the ones that rolled under t…
/r/MensRights17/03/22 04:34 PM
1

The kind of Men depicted in the ad, are the last kind of people to be affected by this approach. For the rest of us, it's like being blamed for something we did in a partner's dream. But after a long track record of selective outrage from the ideology behind the ad, its getting harder to take this stuff seriously.
/r/MensRights17/03/22 04:11 PM
1

In the fringe, extremist mad feminist content that I have been fed, I have never seen disparities that favor women, receive challenge or scrutiny or correction from feminism. EVER, in absolutely ANY example. My biased, limited one sided view of feminism has also only shown me that gender disparities that favor men are always thought by feminism to be caused by some conspiracy or systemic unfairness. and are always challenged and seen as something to correct. ALWAYS in absolutely EVERY example. P…
/r/MensRights14/03/22 09:58 AM
6

feminists in those fields search only for victimhood. If they find female victims, they down tools and move on to another topic. If they find male victims, they dig deeper until they can either blame men or find a female victim. Feminism is to genuine social study what grave robbers are to archeology.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 09:17 AM
3

Trying to be the nicest people on the Internet, makes you the most exploitable. And what do all the rules and terms of service and community guidelines shape you into being? And to whom are these rules most stringently applied?
/r/MensRights12/03/22 08:45 PM
8

Influence > power Male politicians have 'power' the feminists they answer to have 'influence' A politician talks to the wrong group, agrees with the wrong sentiment or passes the wrong law then our papers and screens fill with the familiar old victim cards.
/r/MensRights12/03/22 12:48 PM
1

In the pop culture places there's a lot of talk, right now about embracing the practice of gatekeeping. Is there any of that talk in these spaces?
/r/MensRights11/03/22 06:48 PM
2

I know right! It should be a meme! You can't talk to feminists in feminist spaces, you just get insta-banned. If you want to debate a feminist, you gotta go to a men's right space!
/r/MensRights11/03/22 03:48 PM
3

Look at the influence current mad feminism has over every platform, every discussion, every space. I sure hope they aren't exerting that influence over framing, presentation and discussion of history. Because It would be jolly difficult to spot if they were.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 03:45 PM
4

Excellent! I like how you are expecting action, and not meekly asking for action. It's an important distinction, and I was glad to see it.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 03:12 PM
12

Ahh yes, the people that complain about not taking enough math classes, that made dictionary definitions that clearly reveal they don't know the difference between a modifier and a multiplier still dictating the conversation about a much debunked "Pay Gap" There's something very fishy about an ideology that Loses its debates but Keeps its slogans.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 02:58 PM
21

If you want to say ugly things about women, you have to go to the darkest, places on the internet. If you want to say ugly things about Men, you don't even have to make your facebook group or your tweets private. For me, the issue is no longer the horrendous, bigotry that we regularly see from feminists. Its the total lack of standards that they face for it. Feminism doesn't set its own form. Its as hateful as its environment allows it to be, its arguments are as poorly formed and inconsistent a…
/r/MensRights11/03/22 10:45 AM
2

To the surprise of absolutely nobody, you've gone for question dodging. That's your choice. But putting your fingers in your ears doesn't make the nasty old truth go away. Feminism's TOTAL acceptance of the disparities that benefit themselves as perfectly "normal" clearly reveal how little interest there is in equality. Add to this the cries of "Muh systemic structures!" And touting global conspiracy theories as the ONLY explanation for men outperforming them, and you get the very definition of …
/r/MensRights10/03/22 10:00 PM
2

An example of a gender disparity where women come out ahead, which feminists, like yourself, wish to tackle. and/or correct. Or An example of a gender disparity where men come out ahead, but feminists Are Not concerned that some form of unfairness is the cause. If you please.
/r/MensRights10/03/22 04:12 PM
2

Feminism has lied to you about history, to make you support feminism's further efforts to lie.
/r/MensRights10/03/22 04:05 PM
5

The above will be the feminist attitude forever. The most pandered to and pampered class of people to ever walk the earth will ALWAYS have a selective, agenda driven view of history used to uphold feminist sexism. The answer does not lie in engaging with an ideology that faces no standards or expectations to be correct.
/r/MensRights10/03/22 03:53 PM
3

Defending an idea takes evidence, clarity and consistency. Protecting an idea merely takes power. Look at the last 20 years. Feminism looses every debate, but keeps every slogan. And that's a really important thing to realize. You can't compare the men's rights movement to something like feminism. It's less a movement, and more a societal result of lowered standards and ideological protection. We are expected to stop and explain ourselves and wait for a green light at every single step, at every…
/r/MensRights10/03/22 11:54 AM
3

International Women's day is quietly becoming International Red Pill Day. on IWD, I was asked by a young man at work - "Is there a men's day?" So I gave him the answer but quipped about the hilarious google doodle double standard. He's going to move forward with more nagging questions on his mind, just like we all did at one point.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 10:38 AM
5

"Toxicity" when feminists accuse men of doing anything too much "Fragility" when feminists accuse men of not doing something enough. The response should be to stroke their heads and say "Well done, that is very manipulative, you're so clever."
/r/MensRights09/03/22 10:27 AM
1

Maybe you could sell the draft to feminists with a little reframing? Roll up, Roll up! Free victim points for women dying in wars waged by male leaders! Get 'em while they're hot! Complain about something less than 30 years old! Unique Opportunity! Etc. etc.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 10:12 AM
2

Quite alright, I've doled out the friendly fire myself on occasion.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 10:05 AM
5

I did just want to clarify, I made up the term Feminine Entitlement. I was using it as an example. I arbitrarily claimed it was the root cause of the pay gap, as an example of road blocking an important issue. Can you imagine if each time you want to discuss the wage gap, (or any issue that might be important to you) you are unable to discuss the root causes and the nitty gritty facets. Because some MRA comes busting through the wall, claiming that the issue is "solved" because we can chalk it a…
/r/MensRights09/03/22 08:58 AM
1

'Gets', 'chasing', 'still', 'judges' Is it obvious in some way, other than the language and present tenses used...?
/r/MensRights09/03/22 08:41 AM
2

I'm agreeing with you. We have seen overtly sexist behavior from feminists. And we have seen some dictionary definitions of sexism, being altered by feminists to excuse themselves. You may have seen sexism (re)defined as 'Prejudice + Power' in an effort to claim that "women can't be sexist" but that is obviously crap. So not only do men very clearly face sexism, but by feminism's own use of immense power and influence, men face systemic sexism as well.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 08:37 AM
2

Who gets to leave their children with very little social judgment while chasing their dreams while society still judges the partner they left for being a single mom? What world are you living on?? "Very little social jud-" There's no talking with these people!
/r/MensRights08/03/22 02:57 PM
0

You bring up Voting as an example of entirely clear cut, black and white oppression of men over women... But many women did not want the vote, as they thought that they would be drafted into wars. Some polls even showed the anti Suffrage sentiment held the majority. “The emancipating process has now reached the limits fixed by the physical constitution of women.” -Mary Humphrey Ward. If even the topic of equal voting rights has hidden contexts and murky grey areas, then what feminist talking poi…
/r/MensRights08/03/22 02:49 PM
-1

Were women oppressed, though?
/r/MensRights08/03/22 02:25 PM
1

It is rather terrifying that the "Muh, unreported reports" argument would be adopted by an educator. It is very convenient to claim that the invisible woman can be relied upon whenever and wherever stats and research fail the feminist narrative.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 02:24 PM
11

not if you go by google doodles.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 02:16 PM
4

With great influence, comes no responsibility at all. 'Power' is a mug's game.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 02:15 PM
10

Discrimination based on gender is sexism Altering dictionary definitions to excuse this behavior is evidence of systemic sexism.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 02:14 PM
18

Imagine a term like "Feminine Entitlement" How would you feel about educating yourself on this topic? Let's really try to get to the bottom of your feminine entitlement. What causes it? What harmful world views have you grown up with, to make you so entitled as an adult? How, as a society, can we learn to recognize and call out feminine entitlement and make the world a better, safer place for everyone? Feminine Entitlement is the root cause of many social issues, for example - pay inequality. To…
/r/MensRights08/03/22 01:42 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter