TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Tiwy_Cail Archive

View 0 posts and 57 comments by Tiwy_Cail on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

It's not an excuse, it's the reasoning. English today is waaay different to medieval English. Because new things come up eg ratioing is derived from the word ratio and is associated with online response so obviously the word wouldn't be existent from the beginning. Owing to the slight fact that SOCIAL MEDIA DIDN'T EXIST. If you are against the change of language then stop talking an evolved language
/r/MensRights16/05/26 03:37 PM
3

A language can grow as times change. That's the nature,
/r/MensRights15/05/26 09:37 PM
-1

Isn't knocking yourself out almost impossible? Especially when intentional
/r/MensRights27/04/26 10:14 AM
2

Then it wouldn't be favourable so they would be in the other group
/r/MensRights17/04/26 10:21 AM
2

As accurate as can be
/r/MensRights17/04/26 10:20 AM
2

The reasons are listed within the comments,
/r/MensRights17/04/26 10:19 AM
10

Don't understand it eg Wuornos, the example given she shot multiple people multiple times and still robbed them, how do you attribute that to trauma?
/r/MensRights03/04/26 04:29 AM
1

If you let everything slide because its "free", then don't be shocked by deadly ideas that are spread through as a result. And atp anyone develops their own defense
/r/MensRights02/04/26 08:49 PM
1

There is free speech, but a wrong claim isn't excused from consequence. Would you say it's free speech when someone says something racist or mysogynistic?
/r/MensRights02/04/26 04:26 PM
1

Its never reasonable to make an assumption.
/r/MensRights02/04/26 01:47 AM
2

Thats better. Although in any given year the odds of lightning striking you is 1 in 1.2 million. On the other hand 2-4%of women are lesbians so 1 in 50. Significantly different.
/r/MensRights01/04/26 10:19 AM
2

Most isn't all
/r/MensRights31/03/26 10:09 PM
3

The odds of THUNDER hitting you is zero. So that's a pretty wrong analogy
/r/MensRights31/03/26 10:08 PM
3

"In rap music" and live on an award ceremony are different things. In music people do everything. There are songs for everything.
/r/MensRights22/03/26 11:23 PM
12

You tell them not to fight, you don't praise them for it. Kids do anything all the time but you praise the good and tell them against the bad, not the inverse way
/r/MensRights20/03/26 09:38 PM
3

Ha, I thought it's this thing that anime fans say in weird voice which i've always wanted to know what it means
/r/MensRights17/03/26 07:05 PM
5

That "owo" word, what does it mean
/r/MensRights17/03/26 02:45 PM
6

What does that word mean?
/r/MensRights17/03/26 12:16 PM
4

The vid clearly states "what this epidemic of men" not some, it also states hobby, not everything you do is a hobby so it doesn't mean don't do much else. And we won't even talk about the comment that says its fascist for some reason. You are trying to change the meaning of something very clear
/r/MensRights16/03/26 07:29 PM
3

What exactly is "actual development"? Developing your physique isn't development?? Does growing muscles block mental growth or something?
/r/MensRights16/03/26 03:12 PM
6

Hating men for going to the gym isn't man hate? What is it then? If she said people then you would actually have an argument but she said men
/r/MensRights16/03/26 03:07 PM
6

Yeah having sex atp isn't right but in the given instance. Both parties are drunk so discernment won't be the best pillar for either party ie both parties are almost certain of making a stupid decision
/r/MensRights03/03/26 06:44 PM
1

The law states that but once someone is accused they are unable to prove their "level of being drunk" and atp being drunk won't bail out the accused no matter if it was genuine or not
/r/MensRights03/03/26 06:42 PM
2

A man can get an erection when unconscious too. An erection isn't something that is voluntary. Also drunk doesn't equal unconscious.
/r/MensRights03/03/26 06:35 PM
1

Can never know especially considering the legal definition of rape.
/r/MensRights03/03/26 06:32 PM
5

Not just states, countries too. Something defined as rape and sexual assault to a woman is only sexual assault in very many countries like Uk(don't know if they have fixed it), india etc
/r/MensRights03/03/26 06:27 PM
3

The thing about being drunk is that it takes away your discernment. I'm sure most things drunk people do aren't things they "want" when sober
/r/MensRights03/03/26 06:25 PM
2

Your argument was "he has spelling mistakes". And not even ignoring you saying he has logical fallacies while using fallacies multiple times in your arguments😂. And "talk to woman" and "read a book". All those are fallacies, you aren't responding to his argument you are just insulting him based off an assumption you made of him. A rare 2 in 1 fallacy
/r/MensRights02/03/26 07:24 PM
1

While height and primary sexual development usually stop by 18, "secondary" maturation continues. This includes the development of peak muscle mass and the completion of brain development, which typically lasts until age 25.
/r/MensRights02/03/26 07:16 PM
1

I know, thats why i mentioned its almost impossible." You said kids after puberty" by the time it's after puberty they'll be over 18
/r/MensRights02/03/26 07:05 PM
8

It's not only muscle mass, men also have greater bone density, more of type II muscles than type one, they also tend to have larger circulatory organs like lungs which increase blood and oxygen levels. The reason a boy (kid) seemed equal to a girl is due to being pre-adolescent so they are yet to get proper hormone-promoted growth in which case testosterone allows for more muscle growth(by the time this is achieved people are adults so its hard to observe it in "kids" per se). And don't forget t…
/r/MensRights01/03/26 06:25 AM
6

As hillary clinton (stupidly i may add) said, "women are the primary victims of war, they lose husbands and sons"
/r/MensRights25/02/26 08:12 PM
5

Don't men and women have access to the same things? A rope doesn't require gender check to buy, neither does a knife or a razor or a building if someone wants to jump
/r/MensRights25/02/26 08:10 PM
9

When i was 12 i experienced this and at the very least it was a confusing experience. I obviously liked girls, boobs and all that but when that happened i didn't feel fulfilled or shi, just confusing
/r/MensRights22/02/26 08:01 PM
4

You are deliberately trying to ignore what she's implying. Its like bringing up diddy's race when talking about. Imagine if someone said. "Diddy is still a black man, he can...., question is, what would that have to do with anything. Why introduce an implication where there isn't?
/r/MensRights17/02/26 03:15 PM
6

It literally reads "disabled men are still men". You may turn the blind eye but I won't. What does them being a man have to do with them harrasing?
/r/MensRights17/02/26 11:01 AM
1

Ah yeah, if you can find a way. Its a very capable equipment
/r/MensRights17/02/26 04:40 AM
3

Id rather say the core of a post about stephen hawking IS the stephen hawking part but to each there own. Some of these comments (esp first one) aren't even acknowledging that disabled people are able of doing things, they are just man hating then including disabled men. It literally says "men even when disabled"
/r/MensRights17/02/26 04:14 AM
8

But its not an agile machine i.e its a very limiting piece of equipment. Such people may be unable to save themselves when in danger and in peak position due to adrenaline let alone when they aren't
/r/MensRights16/02/26 02:09 PM
18

They are talking about women who are deliberately ignoring facts and calling it pedo apologist for stating them but the comments are the vile parts? Yeah sure
/r/MensRights16/02/26 02:07 PM
49

Wait a minute. Did that comment somehow find a way to paint the HUSBAND wrongly. Imagine seeing a pedo and the immediate thought is insulting the spouse🤦🤦
/r/MensRights07/02/26 04:21 PM
1

For someone who understands what he wanted you sure are looking for too many loopholes
/r/MensRights27/01/26 09:45 AM
1

Judging by the post he is looking for clarity. If he was looking for a case he wouldn't be posting on Reddit now, would he?
/r/MensRights26/01/26 06:48 PM
1

He'll walk in there and somehow probably get the short end of the stick. Hell, he might even end up being the one blamed
/r/MensRights26/01/26 06:46 PM
3

He was vomiting mate, that's a pretty high level of intoxication for you to vomit. That is literally a sign of high blood alcohol concentration. You shouldn't even drive . Another sign is that she drove and he doesn't remember the night clearly. Those are textbook signs of high BAC
/r/MensRights26/01/26 12:13 AM
4

Consent is the point of reference to judge rape. A drunk person will most probably give in, they don't have the willpower not to. And consent is judged by mental willpower or "serenity". Same way engaging with a minor is rape regardless of whether they give in. Simple, they don't have a mental capacity not to or even to. Like they say coercion to say yes is as equal to no
/r/MensRights25/01/26 10:02 PM
12

An erect penis isn't the equivalent of a vagina, a penis is equivalent to a vagina. You're trying to move the goalpost to feel justified. And I have seen the former very many times in movies and shows usually comedy
/r/MensRights25/01/26 07:20 PM
25

What a sensible argument you have there. Sharp as a marble you are
/r/MensRights25/01/26 07:17 PM
13

https://interactofwake.org/resources/gender-based/ You may also check the NIH stats. Lesbians are top followed by heterosexual relationships and last in gay relationships. So maybe people need to recheck their narratives
/r/MensRights25/01/26 12:30 PM
11

I never said you disagreed, I said you mistimed your comment. So your comment appears as victim blaming. If we are talking about a certain crime and someone tries to show "reason" (I say that lightly) of the offender, it appears as victim blaming. When we talk about manipulation with sex obviously consent is a state presumed. (Otherwise the man in question wouldn't find it an obstacle because yes or no is same)
/r/MensRights20/01/26 01:27 AM
9

He is talking about how IT is abuse and you are bringing up an implication from it that is different. It's like those people who comment "they do it too" on a comment about assault. He says manipulation is abuse then you said a woman not having sex isn't manipulation( which is true in itself but as per the context, it comes out as you justifying it). I'm not a native English speaker so it's tough to explain. Simply put, you carry the right idea just wrong position to place it
/r/MensRights20/01/26 01:17 AM
12

That's an analogy🤦. The OG comment is talking about people who manipulate by use of sex not abuse then you imply they are of no body autonomy. Put it this way, imagine someone talking about people manipulating women for sex with say incriminating pics being wrong then you bring up how taking pics is wrong and all. (It is true but not necessary and really implicative of the original thought shared)
/r/MensRights20/01/26 01:05 AM
16

Imagine someone talking about manipulation and then you bring up abuse. That's making an implication that was not necessary in the context hence the downvotes
/r/MensRights20/01/26 12:40 AM
-16

If you actually knew men and not live in a social media bubble, you would know the difference. But hey I guess you are the party talked about so can't expect much
/r/MensRights20/01/26 12:37 AM
-12

Not having sex isn't weaponizing.
/r/MensRights19/01/26 11:08 PM
29

Here is something I don't get. How is it that misandry doesn't kill? If you take any case of "misogyny" and switch the victim's gender, you are sure to find multiple cases. Or is there a different logic applied??
/r/MensRights13/01/26 04:17 AM
0

Huyo wa "he is now 50" anajiua, either anadate wababa ama pia yeye ni mzee. Si flex vile anadhani
/r/MensRights09/01/26 08:14 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter