TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TjPshine Archive

View 0 posts and 84 comments by TjPshine on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

That subreddit is garbage. I got banned for saying that you can't ignore politicians actions because of where they technically identify in politics.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/12/21 07:56 AM
3

Unfortunately in situations like this you really don't want to do. The old "cc their superior" option unless pressed. First you email them saying I feel x, then if they ignore it, you say this is important to me and I feel that "big boss" should know. That's when you cc. Doing it earlier just pushes the crazies over the edge, and makes life harder.
/r/MensRights16/09/21 10:20 PM
13

Yeah US nudity laws are insane, and I imagine UT has the worst of them. Poor woman.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/03/21 12:10 PM
1

Yup, some places are fucked. The UK also only recognizes rape as man on woman. The OED as well, which is why I prefer Webster's or random house
/r/MensRights26/11/20 12:12 AM
1

My position is that if you believe what you just said you believe then you shouldn't think communism is so evil as everyone in this thread says, but rather that it is a system that is ideal but impractical, and that it's tenants are good to have in mind as we progress socially in the world. Now, personally I believe that a hard socialism would be able to bring about communist and Marxist ideals without the necessary problems - have a democratic government that is able to enact what you described…
/r/PussyPassDenied31/03/20 09:40 PM
2

The problem is that you somehow think I disagree with any of that.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/03/20 09:24 PM
2

I suggest that you look into the death of the author. Separating the art from the artist is the only thing that allows us to actually understand the work - in that view. . Look, I don't think communism would work. I wish it could, but I don't think it can, or rather, I'd be too scared to try. But it's a beautiful idea, and it is well thought out, and everyone else who has been responding to me by saying communism is evil and communists and socialists are the scum of humanity are deranged. That's…
/r/PussyPassDenied31/03/20 12:53 PM
2

I don't know enough about him to claim he was a good person. Frankly I think it's irrelevant.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/03/20 10:30 AM
2

Question: where did I say Karl Marx was a good person? Things I will say about Marx: i. The manifesto was a good document, blatant and accurate in its social commentary and the first trans national political document, ii. The manifesto outlined a new idea, rather than just asking for change like everything that came before it, reinstancing the same problem over and over.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/20 10:48 PM
1

I do not, I just believe in basic human decency.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/20 09:36 PM
-1

Nowhere did I say I was a communist.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/20 09:23 PM
0

I made no switch. Read what I said, I've been consistent the whole way through.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/20 09:08 PM
1

The level of ignorance here is just astounding
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/20 08:55 PM
1

Read what I responded to. If you want to take comments out of context then yes, you can infer whatever you want. You're reading through and responding to all my comments. I don't know why, but if you're still spouting this weird bullshit after that then you're just dense. Get help, or continue being sad and ignorant.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/20 08:04 PM
6

Absolutely. Communism cannot be instantiated in the world because we are totally fallible as a species. That does not mean someone claiming to be a communist is evil, though, it just means they are a good person who hasn't had the need (read: opportunity/poewer) to create a working system based off their obviously good beliefs. Aside from your whole weird "provable fact" thing you're so close to getting the point.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/20 07:54 PM
1

Yeah you're totally right. Vietnam. Iran. Iraq. Tobacco. Sugar. Plastic. Countless species. The slave trade. Colonial horrors. the current number of starving and homeless in the USA right now because people like in this thread think socialism is evil
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/20 07:35 PM
1

Overthrowing dictators and slave drivers is "justifying hurting innocent people"? You're right, the status quo should never change, because it means the people who have it good through others suffering would lose their castles
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/20 07:28 PM
2

Well history has shown what capitalism is too, and the death tolls are pretty similar.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/20 06:53 PM
5

That's not accurate at all, the bit about being a slave to society or the bit about evil authoritarians. Look I've read your little rants, and how you've responded to every comment of mine with the same thing. The only thing you're doing is showing your ignorance of what communism is. I don't think this conversation can really go anywhere else if you just keep repeating your buzzwords.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/20 05:28 PM
-1

*citation needed. Multiple citations.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/20 04:55 PM
5

Communism can't be implemented because we are so corruptable as people. That doesn't make the ideology evil, it just makes it impractical. There's nothing wrong with being a Marxist at heart so long as you understand the economic and social realities of our world.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/20 04:54 PM
3

How about "throughout the entire fucking book"? Uh, I just read through it again a week ago I didn't find a single instance. Hitler literally used "getting rid of the 1%" as a dogwhistle for talking about exterminating Jews, and you somehow think you're not Nazi scum when you parrot his rhetoric? So anyone who talks about an inequality in society is just paraphrasing Hitler and hates jewish people? That seems absurd. Especially considering Hitler came 50 years after Marx/Engels wrote their book.…
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/20 04:30 PM
-11

No, I'm just highlighting that you're the one who said it, not me. I wonder what you meant by that.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/20 04:12 PM
3

Can you please show me where in Marx and Engels' work there is a justification for hurting innocent people? I agree with you completely about hurting people, it makes you scum. You seem really heated. Again, I suggest you actually read about communism, and I can suggest you some great writers (easiest to start just with Marx), that way you don't come off as ignorant as you are right now. Your priorities are in the right spot - you're just an idiot.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/20 04:11 PM
-2

Maybe if you read Mein Kampf and compare it to the communist manifesto you will see why your little analogy makes no sense.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/20 04:00 PM
-10

under the guise of communism
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/20 03:56 PM
-29

I can't believe communist is still a dirty word
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/20 02:52 PM
16

No, she hasn't done anything
/r/MensRights12/12/19 07:30 PM
1

Well to treat a philosophical viewpoint as a mob of individuals with a ubiquitous mind that has the "goal" of invading a subreddit is nonsensical, so I didn't really have to do anything other than laugh.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 09:20 PM
-12

lol
/r/MensRights16/09/19 11:33 PM
-24

It's people like you that make this movement a joke.
/r/MensRights16/09/19 10:59 PM
1

Hey I appreciate it, but I don't think saying "hey it already says that in the article" is that bad. Have a nice life!
/r/MensRights13/04/19 02:30 AM
0

And I firmly believe that letting people get away with asshole behaviour is worse behaviour than stating someone was being an asshole.
/r/MensRights12/04/19 08:55 PM
1

Two hours ago, when the comment I responded to made a post, the information was there. I don't understand how you can hate words, but I guess you've already shown that you're just an asshole
/r/MensRights12/04/19 08:44 PM
21

Lol it literally says in the article you posted that she's being investigated.
/r/MensRights12/04/19 06:25 PM
1

Like I said, there's a firm difference between insulting you and dismissing your argument through insulting you. You consistently claim that feminism is some sort of Nazi machine, as you have again, which is very much attacking something instead of actually discussing it like a normal human being. I'm not from either England or Australia. A 3 second browsing of my posting history would have told you that. I thought you said you knew all about me? Feminism is an academic theory, it's not somethin…
/r/MensRights19/03/19 02:57 PM
1

You keep on claiming that I'm falling into ad hominem, but I haven't at all. There's a difference between insulting you and insulting you as an argument. You, on the other hand, refuse to actually engage in a conversation, and instead are making things up about me to insult and treating that as some sort of discussion, which is the actual meaning of ad hominem. This last post has convinced me that you are just satire. Pretty good stuff mate, I was genuinely convinced you were more idiotic than a…
/r/MensRights18/03/19 04:02 PM
0

I'm not censoring you. I'm laughing at you. You know nothing about me and all you've done is make a bunch o's assumptions because my definition of feminist is accepted by the academic world and yours is synonymous with naziism.
/r/MensRights16/03/19 03:35 PM
-1

I've answered a billion times my thoughts in this thread. You literally compared feminists to Hitler. Obviously any discussion with you is apt to have you yelling stupid insults and complaining about femoids, as you are. You're right, I have no interest in talking to an ignorant fuck such as yourself, and couldn't care less how you see me "an mra since before I was born" I don't even know if you have the capacity to read. Enjoy living your terrible life where you hate everyone.
/r/MensRights16/03/19 12:00 AM
1

Fair enough! I agree brother and good luck with your assignment
/r/MensRights15/03/19 11:57 PM
1

I'm sorry, you said this: If everyone was feminist, we would only be helping women with the gender-related problems they have. Basically, we would have an inequality where men would have 100% of the problems. Which, correct me if I'm wrong (I'm not) means that you beleive it is impossible for someone to advocate for male rights while calling themselves a feminist. If everyone was a square, no one would be orange! You see how those two statements have nothing to do with each other? That's the pro…
/r/MensRights15/03/19 08:03 PM
-1

That's not true at all? Why don't you do some reading? Aside from mentioning the fact that power structures traditionally are male based there is nothing there about destroying men" you seem to be confusing "people I hate who call themselves feminists" with "how and what feminism is and came To be" https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-liberal/
/r/MensRights15/03/19 08:00 PM
0

Cool! That still doesn't answer my questions, at all. Again, I've said 3 times now, I'm willing to take your definition for the conversation, but that doesn't answer why one may not define themselves as a feminist. Here's where I take my definition from, if it interests you, although, for a fourth time, it's irrelevant to this conversation. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-liberal/
/r/MensRights15/03/19 07:51 PM
1

If you say so, but I'm curious as to why that makes you think one can't be both your version of a feminist and whatever you define an mra as
/r/MensRights15/03/19 07:50 PM
1

Feminism is the advocacy of the individual and the individuals interests, understanding that general rules/regulations do not apply to most situations and, on top of that, are often slated to favour corporations and "the way things have always been" in our capitalist system. The feminist is interested in saying that while it may seem fair to provide all of the same things to each individual, that does not account for the fact that each individual may have different needs in a society. https://pl…
/r/MensRights15/03/19 07:49 PM
1

But you did that at first. That was why you defined yourself as not a feminist. Do you need me to read it back to you?
/r/MensRights15/03/19 07:46 PM
1

Oh, I did... Nothing there like your statement. And again, I'm willing to accept your definition for the point of this discussion, I just fail to see where it says in your exact definition "feminists cannot support men's rights", as your comment clearly says it does.
/r/MensRights15/03/19 07:39 PM
0

It's interesting that you pull a definition I can't find anywhere else. It's also interesting that you think that definition, regardless of how I feel about it, excludes helping men with their issues. One can be your feminist as well as your mra, but you talk as if they're mutually exclusive.
/r/MensRights15/03/19 07:23 PM
0

I beleive the majority of people on this sub, regardless of if they know what it means
/r/MensRights15/03/19 07:17 PM
1

While the teacher has misdefined feminism I don't think the answer here is misdefining it for your own purpose. You don't have to twist the assignment at all, it says in the instructions sexist/chauvinistic. Read the slash as an or, and choose something sexist towards men.
/r/MensRights15/03/19 06:22 PM
-1

Everyone should be feminist. I believe the majority of people on this sub are feminists, regardless of if they know that or know what that even means. But this assignment has nothing to do with feminism and is complete bullshit. If I were you OP I would do the assignment as tasked. It says right there, explain why something is sexist/ chauvinistic. Things can be sexist towards men, this sub is full of examples. Find obe
/r/MensRights15/03/19 06:20 PM
-5

Thanks for teaching me how to read! Maybe you can read my original response/what it was I was responding to?
/r/MensRights17/04/18 09:45 PM
-11

Continue reading though. I quote. But you didn't actually say no? But you didn't physically resist? But you've had sex with this person before? doesn't matter Note, I'm not challenging this part of the chart. I'm just showing you the part of the chart I'm referencing
/r/MensRights17/04/18 05:40 PM
66

She never said "No" she never physically resisted. She never screamed or ran out of the room. You can see right on this chart that that doesn't actually mean anything. Not that you should need to. This chart is garbage but only believing in vocal consent is idiotic.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 03:43 PM
1

Well I'd rather be banned from that hate subreddit.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/02/18 04:29 PM
1

In Canada you do have a right to feel safe.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 10:33 PM
2

Any studies you find will be in the field of evolutionary psychology and will be absolute bullshit. There are tons out there. Try searching on sciencedaily.com, but be aware they won't prove shit.
/r/MensRights06/11/16 12:44 AM
1

It's not theft to torrent in my country
/r/MensRights11/10/16 11:11 AM
2

Not in my country, but please, keep imposing weird IP laws on me
/r/MensRights11/10/16 03:00 AM
6

This comment has been overwritten by an open source script to protect this user's privacy. It was created to help protect users from doxing, stalking, and harassment. If you would also like to protect yourself, add the Chrome extension TamperMonkey, or the Firefox extension GreaseMonkey and add this open source script. Then simply click on your username on Reddit, go to the comments tab, scroll down as far as possibe (hint:use RES), and hit the new OVERWRITE button at the top. Also, please consi…
/r/MensRights28/04/16 04:17 PM
4

This comment has been overwritten by an open source script to protect this user's privacy. It was created to help protect users from doxing, stalking, and harassment. If you would also like to protect yourself, add the Chrome extension TamperMonkey, or the Firefox extension GreaseMonkey and add this open source script. Then simply click on your username on Reddit, go to the comments tab, scroll down as far as possibe (hint:use RES), and hit the new OVERWRITE button at the top. Also, please consi…
/r/MensRights19/06/15 06:07 PM
3

This comment has been overwritten by an open source script to protect this user's privacy. It was created to help protect users from doxing, stalking, and harassment. If you would also like to protect yourself, add the Chrome extension TamperMonkey, or the Firefox extension GreaseMonkey and add this open source script. Then simply click on your username on Reddit, go to the comments tab, scroll down as far as possibe (hint:use RES), and hit the new OVERWRITE button at the top. Also, please consi…
/r/MensRights02/06/15 12:47 PM
2

Well the article is criticising this "safe space" idea, so yours would probably receive similar flak. Did you read the article?
/r/MensRights22/03/15 04:06 PM
15

Works for me. Are you clicking past the ad?
/r/MensRights04/12/14 07:22 PM
68

Here is one of the literally dozens of sources that you will find disproving the wage gap myth. http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2012/04/16/its-time-that-we-end-the-equal-pay-myth/
/r/MensRights04/12/14 06:36 PM
9

..why?
/r/MensRights29/09/14 12:09 PM
20

But they were underage too?
/r/MensRights07/08/14 03:18 PM
1

I was just about to say. The issue here is in the presentation of the two subjects. One: a woman who got pregnant and two: a man who got a woman pregnant. I'm glad you could put this more elegantly than me.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 07:20 PM
2

While you are correct, the issue isn't that one has more insight coming from a certain position, but that "coming from a blank" implies no one else can see it. You don't need to be black to see that slavery was bad. You don't need to be Armenian to appreciate a genocide. And you don't need to be a mother to know x. If you do need to be something in order to know something else, then that means 99% of the time it was subjective, otherwise it would be common knowledge, like slavery or genocide.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 08:43 PM
8

That's not the point, the point is that when someone has to preface their argument with " I have this deep insight you don't have, and you won't understand my point, but that makes your argument invalid, not mine" you should be cautious.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 02:51 PM
13

Well, I can't argue with that! Thanks for the information
/r/MensRights01/01/14 05:38 PM
-6

No, it says in your definition degrades appearance or function. I believe my penis functions fine, and believe many people find circumcised penis's more attractive. That being said, I don't have an issue with it being referred to as mgm, but according to your definition, it is not
/r/MensRights01/01/14 05:28 PM
3

No, Oxford has always been gender neutral, as far as I can recall. Webster's usually says 'man' though.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 05:07 AM
5

That's their point, they are constantly in fear of every object they use in their lives raping them, as men and phallic objects have no self control, and are the only things that can rape (sexually assault a woman). (before that gets out of hand, that last line was a satirical definition)
/r/MensRights01/03/13 08:51 PM
1

I remember reading a story on here a while ago about a woman who accused a gay man of rape cause he wouldn't date her. Yeah. That was a satisfying story, and I'd love to find it for you. But until then, like MensRightDirectory says.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 05:06 AM
5

I think a simple 'Thank you' is all I really ever need to say to posts like these.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 08:40 PM
1

Neither am I, but I picked Maine.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 07:26 AM
2

So only 64% of this subreddit live in the States, yet only 24% of you don't live in the States.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 03:34 AM
6

Yeah, I've never heard of the " Rape Shield Law" But that sounds like the biggest piece of shit in the world.
/r/MensRights28/07/12 04:58 PM
0

It could potentially be because some of the redditors in /r/atheism think that some religions teach men to oppress women? I have no opinion on that, and I have no idea if that is why it was in /r/atheism
/r/MensRights17/07/12 02:43 AM
1

I'm going to not talk about what I think about the article and point this out. Datlawyerface
/r/MensRights22/05/12 01:17 AM
0

I guess I don't read too closely. Thank you for pointing that out to me, I retract my comments
/r/MensRights16/05/12 02:45 AM
5

I think we're all missing the point of this article. It's not that their shouldn't be a separation between boys/girls teams, or ages on teams such as a junior/senior team, but that everyone should be allowed to play. If there was a boy's team for him to join, I don't think they should have let him on the girl's team. Because men are physically bigger and more fit than women naturally. (I'm not saying all men and in better shape than women, in fact I would bet the opposite, but if you gave a man …
/r/MensRights16/05/12 12:12 AM
3

This has a lot in common with the 'never hit a woman' thing. You should never hit anyone, regardless of their sex or gender (yes, they are different). I know that I am some anonymous face on the internet, but I want to tell you it means a lot to me to know that there are women out there like you, who have come to this realization, and who are on the side of equality. As I always say, if you want equal rights, we shouldn't be talking about women's rights, but people's rights. I don't condemn you …
/r/MensRights15/05/12 05:05 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter