TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ToOurEnd Archive

View 0 posts and 48 comments by ToOurEnd on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
12

Did you seriously comment twice? I think you might need to research what white knight means here. You can dislike collective behavior but you are picking the worst imaginable person to hoist up in an effort to defend that very understandable position.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/03/17 06:46 AM
10

You know someone might take offense to the baseless things you lob out if it wasn't in defense of Amy fucking Schumer. Strip away all of the animosity from Reddit towards this woman and you still have a very unfunny, very petty, very unpleasant and very egotistical and insufferable woman.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/03/17 06:44 AM
20

I don't like Amy but watch me white knight for her in a series of pointless ad hominems applied to a nebulous body of countless people on a website I frequently post on lmao
/r/PussyPassDenied16/03/17 06:38 AM
3

So he's getting the Zimmerman treatment. Great.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 11:10 PM
11

He wasn't white.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 10:36 PM
1

Like most things VICE puts out journalism wise/recently, I mostly found this reprehensible. Indifference reigns.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 05:22 PM
1

You'll have to find when I shat on anyone there between constantly accusing your opponents of buzzwords. You're more anti-anyone than I am by far, that's the utter irony about social justice warriors (and by extent, liberals) who claim to espouse equality.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 10:41 PM
0

Take that "we know better than you" shit to tumblr. That you're still insisting everyone who disagrees is 'racist' in addition to inserting your political belief only provides more proof that you can't have this sort of discussion. This is the last place for someone speaking about the merits of SJWs to be.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 10:11 PM
2

I stopped reading after you groundlessly accused me of being a racist. For someone who I assume would decry radical feminism you're acting awful like them by assuming any who criticize you/those who align with your manner of thinking are racist (or, in feminism's case, sexist.) Leave that behavior at the door. This isn't the place for it.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 11:27 AM
3

I will not condone a system in the US that favors one miserable group over another miserable group, even if said implementation does so to allegedly "make up" for a greater/lesser disparity. It ultimately does more harm than good. Obama's approach to racial relations in America is shady enough as is and this sort of thing only further suggests blatant favoritism. This is the same man who also constantly abides by feminist rhetoric (IE wage gap) in all of his speeches.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 09:14 AM
0

White male here. I'm NOT ok with this. Any manner of race exclusive programs are inherently flawed and frequently lead to turmoil.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 02:54 AM
2

I'm more concerned that angry white men suddenly have no reason to be angry (even though society insists these people cannot be discriminated against and happen to live lives of extraordinary leisure at the costs of others) as well as no reason to be taken seriously. Would they care if it were men that weren't white? If so, what does that say about how we as a society view white men? Oh, right - I think we all know already. It's the only group where racism doesn't count for some invalid reason. …
/r/MensRights30/11/13 12:34 AM
7

Somehow I'm not surprised.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 08:51 PM
48

Society holds an entire race/gender in contempt for as many years as it has and it has the gall to wonder, "Why are they angry?" Simply asking that question doesn't help either. You've made racism against whites not count as racism - You've even encouraged it as acceptable behavior. You've made sexism against men not count as sexism - Another act of discrimination which has also been encouraged as appropriate. Why on earth would you even begin to wonder why people are angry? The anger is purely …
/r/MensRights08/11/13 05:22 PM
1

Never get in the way of people circle jerking over their favorite bald "equal rights activist."
/r/MensRights06/11/13 03:51 PM
42

Amusingly enough Rockstar manages to receive billions in revenue despite openly telling the feminists to fuck off. It makes you wonder if the developers that did cave into feminists demands still feel that doing so was a lucrative choice.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 08:43 AM
5

Yeah I'm fairly certain that unkind remarks are very frequently classified as 'spousal abuse.' It's only fair it applies to both genders.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 06:38 PM
2

Learning not to play into their language is more important than twisting it. There is no patriarchy. Acknowledging it and presuming your role within it only serves to reaffirm a thing that doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 11:56 PM
6

Because men are disposable yet are somehow 'privileged' at the same time.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 08:14 PM
1

I guess they'll only take that 'women and children' comment offensive if it comes from a political figure that happens to disagree with their political standing. Typical.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 05:52 PM
57

It's remarkable to see how Something Awful has transformed into an ultra-liberal, castrated, humorless form of 4chan. Not that Reddit itself isn't very far from that description.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 12:47 AM
4

But there are health benefits from the procedure Do you have legitimate proof of this? and sex is excellent How can you confirm this from both perspectives?
/r/MensRights22/08/13 06:49 PM
0

Are you honestly implying that there isn't an egregious double standard when it comes to sentencing? That's one of the first instances of inequality that Men's Rights addresses, little research is required to reaffirm that fact.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 04:56 AM
1

The hate crime allegation was thrown out the window during the case, even the FBI stated there was no evidence of Zimmerman pursuing Trayvon on the grounds of race. I'm not keen to the fact that you had no comment in regards to the link I provided earlier.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 10:23 PM
1

It was self defense. Even if it wasn't - Why did those white victims of hate crimes not have their stories told to the country?
/r/MensRights16/08/13 10:16 PM
1

Zimmerman's case was a simple event of self defense, the trial itself proved this beyond reasonable doubt. The media insisted it a racially motivated hate crime and virtually every political figure (in addition to a few celebrities) had comments that further perpetuated the idea of a racially motivated incident occurring despite not being. Why does everyone know who Zimmerman is but no one knows who Roderick Scott is? There is no way you can defend the race baiting that transpired with the case …
/r/MensRights16/08/13 09:59 PM
0

Please find me a case where a man who murdered children was allowed to walk on the grounds of good behavior.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 09:45 PM
1

I suppose journalism 101 just happened to miss out on the case that reversed the races and ran with information given solely by the killer. Stop trying to disregard the hypocrisy, it's insulting to the victims who are otherwise told they have it good for being part of the 'privileged' race.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 09:44 PM
1

Which would likely be a non-option had this woman been a man. Unless you're willing to find a man who happened to murder 45 children that was released on good behavior?
/r/MensRights16/08/13 09:47 AM
1

Didn't see Nancy Grace or Obama offer some words for that child like they offered for a certain other one. Guess some kids are more important than others?
/r/MensRights15/08/13 11:21 PM
6

Pretty sure blatant examples of institutionalized misandry that favors women, even when it comes to murdering children, is fairly relevant to men's rights.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 11:12 PM
2

Guess they must have missed these people, huh? Guess they also neglected to make this case, which conveniently happens to have reversed the races of a certain case regarding self defense that moaned on and on for a year, nation wide as well, huh?
/r/MensRights15/08/13 09:48 AM
3

Them doing what they're doing now does more than you presume it does.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 09:34 AM
9

You heard it here from Dronelisk, folks - Refusing to play a game that actively fucks you over makes you subhuman trash. Better start making the money and pumping into whatever mystery machine will remedy all our problems.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 09:01 AM
8

Ah, Patriarchy theory - Where if our problems are the same as their problems it's still our fault. Seriously, OP - Why did you link this? Any writer that cites such nonsensical things has no purpose here.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 06:59 AM
8

It's not a secret that there's a very obvious and tremendous bias when it comes to reporting/broadcasting hate crimes. You should be more uncomfortable with the fact that this sort of thing is only seen on places like /r/whiterights. And you really can't argue against that obvious double standard. Even if you pry away the blatant hypocrisy of race you still have an adult woman guilty of abducting, torturing and murdering an infant boy - Were the genders (or races) reversed this would be world wi…
/r/MensRights15/08/13 06:35 AM
3

What the hell happened to you, UK?
/r/MensRights05/08/13 09:29 PM
1

Just one of the many responses she's neglected to address or even acknowledge. I'm sorry those mean anonymous folk hurt her feelings so much though.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 04:15 AM
2

You'll have to find where I implied that. I said Anita pushes a pro-feminist agenda. You said she doesn't despite her very own channel being called Feminist Frequency. So yeah, "LOL."
/r/MensRights02/08/13 08:38 PM
1

Yes because denying Anita is pushing feminism (Oh what's her channel called again?) is completely viable and sane. "LOL!"
/r/MensRights02/08/13 08:24 PM
7

Educational? Really? Copy pasting tropes everyone is aware of to further a feminist agenda is educational now?
/r/MensRights02/08/13 08:16 PM
4

If we're not entitled to discussion than the person making the claim isn't entitled to an agreement. The internet isn't inclined to respect or take a person that simply recycles ancient tropes and copies content from other youtube videos seriously. It really has nothing to do with free speech either - It's the basics of a debate/converse. If Anita wants to pretend what she's saying is reality while willfully ignoring any and all manner of response that contradicts than she's not entitled to be t…
/r/MensRights02/08/13 06:28 PM
4

So you're saying it's alright to block and censor all discussion on the grounds of anonymous faces online being mean?
/r/MensRights02/08/13 06:06 PM
25

People cannot directly make comments or express their opinion on the forefront of the dialogue itself. It's not much of a discussion anyway if the person making said claims refuses to acknowledge any of the glaring flaws that are frequently pointed out. Anita seems to have made it a point to play ignorant to any form of criticism or discussion.
/r/MensRights01/08/13 11:27 PM
–

Wow. She still isn't allowing votes or comments? Quickest way to lose your credibility is to block all discussion/critique.
/r/MensRights01/08/13 10:21 PM
41

The list put Notch higher than Gabe Newell. It couldn't be more skewed or foolish.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 09:09 AM
8

You mean the guy that openly advocates and celebrates the death of all white people? Yeah I think I'll pass. Ram Z Paul made a good video about him.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 12:00 AM
0

This is bad but it's not nearly as bad as Tim Wise's stuff. That guy is full blown racist and it's scary to know there are many institutions that welcome him and his hate speech.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 11:47 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter