~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Are beta bux's that naive?it's a market transation. BB gets children, the wife gets taken care of. everyone wins. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/07/18 10:40 PM |
| 2 | Q4Men: What would it take to put an end to male disposability?Seriously, ffs, there’s never been a society that survived with just one man. if 49 men die the genetic diversity has been cut by 49/100. 49%. the same as if 25 women and 24 men died, or vice versa. but since only men have Y-chromosomes, the diversity of Y-chromosomes has been severely cut by 49/50. 98% percent. or more to the point, there is now only 1. humans are all decedent of a single Y-chromosome, Y-chromosomal Adam there can be no recessive problems with the Y-chromosome, as men only have… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/06/18 09:56 PM |
| 1 | Q4Men: What would it take to put an end to male disposability?half siblings are on average 25% percent genetically identical, with a max of 50%, and a min of 0%. there would be plenty of children with low genetic identicality. also, you seem to think inbreeding is more disastrous than it is. selectively bred animals are inbred like crazy. very few are diseased / retarded / freaks / etc. how inbred do you think the Sentinelese are? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/06/18 11:29 AM |
| 3 | Q4Men: What would it take to put an end to male disposability?humanity has never beaten nature. all we are, and all we have done, is due to our naturally given abilities. nature gave us our brains, and we use them. imagine human evolution continues in the current direction of larger / smarter brains (maybe this will happen, maybe not). in 10 million years, the species that evolve from us, will look back at humans, and consider us primitive animals. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/06/18 08:35 AM |
| 1 | Q4Men: What would it take to put an end to male disposability?there's a tribe with 50 women, and 50 men. if 49 men die, the size of the next generation is not affected. if 49 women die, the next generation is 1/50 the size that it would have been. the definition of life is self replication. the purpose of life is to reproduce. men are far, far, far less valuable reproductively that women. men are disposable. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/06/18 08:31 AM |
| 6 | What about the role of talent in SMV/RMV?a woman who's in her early 20s and super fit is above a 6, period. the reality is most women (obese, disfigured excluded) experience a period in their youth where they are desired by almost all males. you have to remember we're just reproductive machines. a woman's fertility is so closely tied to her age. e.g. an 18 year old can have 5 more kids than a 28 year old. conversely a man of any age can have as many children as willing women. a males value has almost nothing to do with his fertility, b… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/05/18 08:41 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter