TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Tommy2255 Archive

View 0 posts and 12 comments by Tommy2255 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I've seen a few dissenting opinions, but I haven't been here long enough to really know for certain that it's true.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 03:41 PM
1

Oh. We just had Pitiful Pearl. Nobody knew her real name. Apparently she actually did have a house for a while, but she never stayed there and it got condemned and torn down. She just wandered around with her cats and a grocery cart. Anyway, my point was that crazies can have any set of genitals.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 06:21 AM
1

I haven't been here long, but I've heard the stories of how ban happy feminist subs are, while the sidebar of /r/MensRights says explicitly: "People posting here are sharing their opinions. Opinions will not be removed," and I have seen no evidence that this position is not carried out.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 05:17 AM
1

Don't worry, I fixed it.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 05:10 AM
1

Have you ever lived in a decent sized community that didn't have at least one crazy cat lady wandering around?
/r/MensRights08/04/13 04:49 AM
1

The core issue is that marriage is cheaper than an equivalent private contract in addition to added tax incentives. I remember reading about a gay couple a few months back that attempted to arrange a private contract equivalent to a marriage contract and ended up paying thousands of dollars in fees. If the process of forming such an agreement were simplified, a marriage could be negotiated just like any other contract, rather than trying to fit every relationship into one-size-fits-all guideline…
/r/MensRights08/04/13 04:43 AM
1

Through that whole list they kept listing "Acceptable uses", and I kept thinking "Acceptable to whom and why should I care?", because I don't think that there's significant overlap between people who are offended by the word idiot and people whose opinions I care about. And I still maintain that "Has intellectual disabilities" sounds at least as insulting as any other way of phrasing it. There's no way to say someone's stupid without making it sound like they're stupid.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 04:07 AM
2

I've never understood that particular brand of PC in particular. Is there any non-insulting way to say someone has low intelligence? I mean, the more sensitive you try to be, the more patronizing you sound.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 03:24 AM
1

I only ever responded to one post on SRS a while back. Someone said something to the effect that "anyone who imagines having sex with some one has raped them with their mind", to which I responded "Three cheers for thought crime?". The mod didn't actually give me a reason. They just said "Hip hip hooray! Hip hip hooray! Hip hip hooray!" I'm almost glad I'm banned from there. 'Tis a silly place.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 03:22 AM
1

Well, since the first is clearly immoral because it requires punishing virtue and rewarding sloth and incompetence, I'm not sure why this is even a question.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 03:16 AM
1

I would be willing to fight in the event of a war I fully supported, especially if the US were actually in real danger of invasion. But if I were drafted or were in the military while a draft was called, I would murder as many of my commanding officers as possible until I myself was killed. I'd fight to protect freedom. I would not live, fight, and die as a slave.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 02:57 AM
4

Well, kids of either gender are pretty terrible, but I think the idea here is that the mother is a terrible person.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 02:00 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter