TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TomsRedditAccount1 Archive

View 0 posts and 109 comments by TomsRedditAccount1 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I think the issue here is that different individuals have different lists.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 10:19 PM
1

Word of the week is "intrasexual competition" (ok, technically two words). This refers to competition among members of the same sex. In this case, women are competing for male attention, so they try to look prettier than other women. Incidentally, this is almost certainly the reason why the 'fat acceptance' movement is mostly women; it's to remove competitors. And, yes, men also engage in intrasexual competition.
/r/MensRights24/02/24 06:35 AM
2

Cases like this are why defamation should be a criminal offence, not just a civil dispute. She should be in prison for crying wolf.
/r/MensRights04/02/24 06:15 PM
2

We need to start by replacing every mention of 'man' or 'woman' with 'person'. I wouldn't say it should be illegal for a person to drink, just on the offchance that they might get raped. What I would say is, if two people are both equally drunk and they have sex, then the rape accusation should go both ways.
/r/MensRights20/01/24 06:39 AM
2

I could maybe agree with you on that, but that's an irrelevant red herring. In this case, it's either that the bouncers don't have a valid reason, or they're lying about their reason. That's not ok.
/r/MensRights03/01/24 05:52 PM
8

Obtaining By Deception, which is a form of fraud. Other countries probably have something similar.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 07:47 PM
1

Well, I guess she wanted to look good for him.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 07:45 PM
1

Define "think about". I mean, if it pops into my head for half a minute because it was mentioned in conversation or on a YouTube thumbnail, does that count? Or are they asking whether we just stand around fantasising about the legions?
/r/MensRights21/09/23 10:38 AM
1

It'll fix itself in a few generations. For the whole of human history, sex and reproduction have been inextricably linked. You had a sex drive so that you could have kids. But now, with modern contraception, the two can be separated. So now there is a strong selective pressure towards people who actually want kids.
/r/MensRights19/09/23 07:50 PM
1

Now you're contradicting yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 11:43 AM
1

Sorry, I expected you to know the difference between "you" and "they". Don't worry, pronouns aren't too hard, you'll get the hang of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 11:36 AM
1

You do look like children. I'm 30, and I'm pretty sure I don't look like a child. And before anyone makes any other assumptions, my girlfriend's 27, so I don't have a horse in this race.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 11:23 AM
1

Wait, really?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 11:04 AM
1

They're saying that puberty is the reason why 18-25 year olds don't look like children. It's odd that you didn't pick up on that, when it seems pretty obvious. Would that be motivated reasoning?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 10:56 AM
2

A lot of people seem to have difficulty understanding that maturation is a process, not an event.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 10:53 AM
1

Read what I just wrote, and see if you can figure out why that's a stupid question.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/23 08:08 PM
1

I'll reiterate: Women are allowed to avoid those ongoing consequences, men aren't. Pregnancy isn't everything. Yes, only women get pregnant, and so only women can get a medical abortion. But abortion is not always done for a medical reason. Sometimes it is done for another reason, such as financial or lifestyle considerations. If a woman is allowed to avoid those ongoing consequences, then a man should be allowed to. I don't think I can dumb this down any further, so unless you genuinely have a …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/23 07:07 PM
1

No, there is a double standard. Women are allowed to avoid those ongoing consequences, men aren't.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/23 06:52 PM
1

I've explained it, I'm just not sure how I can possibly dumb it down any further. Yes, only women can get pregnant. So only women get to have medical abortions. But, both sexes experience ongoing consequences (aka parenthood) so both should have autonomy.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/23 09:01 AM
1

Which neither parent is free from. Yes, but women are allowed to reject those impending consequences. Men aren't. That is the double standard. As I just mentioned, in my previous comment just a couple minutes ago, pregnancy is not the only thing which matters. Yes, men don't have the burden of pregnancy, but they have other consequences, and unlike women they can't choose to back out of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/23 05:22 AM
1

Bodily autonomy is a subset of personal autonomy. It's not only pregnancy that matters here; it has ongoing consequences after the pregnancy. If a man can be forced to become a parent just because he participated in conception, but if a woman is allowed to back out of it after participating in conception, then that is a double standard of autonomy.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/23 05:14 AM
1

If you say that women deserve autonomy and men don't, you are essentially saying that those nine months are the only part that matters.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/23 12:58 AM
1

We'll put it another way; Pregnancy is only the first part of becoming and being a parent. Those first nine months are not the be-all-end-all, the other eighteen years also matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 07:31 PM
0

It's how you become a parent.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 07:25 PM
1

The problem is that you're acting as though those nine months mean everything, and the following eighteen years count for absolutely nothing. That's ridiculous. The consequences of the decision will affect both the man and the woman long after the pregnancy is finished, and you talk as though those consequences don't matter at all. And, again, I am not saying that men should be able to tell women what to do with their bodies. I have not said that at any point in this discussion. What I have said…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 07:25 PM
1

It's not name calling, and I'm not trying to egg you on. It's simply an accurate description. The fact that women can opt out and men can't is due to legislation, not biology. and the other person has all the control? That's exactly the problem we're addressing. One sex is allowed to say "actually, I've changed my mind, I don't want to become a parent", and the other isn't. That's where it's sexist, and hypocritical.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 06:59 PM
1

You're using the current sexist laws to justify the current sexist laws. That's called circular reasoning.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 06:55 PM
3

Once a woman is pregnant she bears all the responsibility. If that were true, we wouldn't be having this conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 06:54 PM
2

Would you prefer if I said parenthood?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 06:53 PM
1

Women also had their chance during sex to not let someone ejaculate inside them. I see it perfectly well. You're a sexist hypocrite, who believes that women should be allowed to decide whether or not to become a parent, at a time when you believe a man should no longer be allowed to. That's a double standard. That is sexism. Imagine if it were the other way around; if men were allowed financial abortions during the pregnancy, but women were forced to accept whatever decision was made at the time…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 06:58 AM
1

I am not against men protecting themselves. Never said I was. You keep saying it's unequal, whilst arguing in favour of inequality. Sure, we'll never be able to make the world 100% perfect, but we should improve things where we can. Just because the situation is unequal, is not a reason to keep it unequal.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 06:14 AM
2

So, you have a sexist double standard. You want women to be allowed to decide after conception, but you don't want men to have equality. We're all humans, we should be treated equally.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 05:20 AM
1

Pregnancy is only one part of parenting, not the be-all-end-all. The consequences of deciding whether or not to become a parent continue long after birth.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 05:15 AM
3

You're only pro-choice for women. For men, you're pro-indenture. That is a sexist double standard. The decision of whether or not to have a child has ongoing consequences long after birth, so don't act like pregnancy is the only thing which matters.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 03:39 AM
4

I comprehend perfectly well that you are a sexist hypocrite. The decision about whether or not to have a child will have ongoing consequences long after the child is born, so we should not use pregnancy as the sole arbiter of whether or not someone should be allowed autonomy, because pregnancy is only a short period of the total. Don’t cum inside a women knowing full well once it’s in her body you don’t have a choice. How about Don't let a man cum inside you knowing full well once it's in your b…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 03:37 AM
5

And a woman loses her credibility when she lets/makes someone cum inside her. Except that, nowadays, women have the privilege of being allowed to decide later, something which men don't have as an equal right. Men don't have absolute control during sex, unless you're talking about rape. Sex involves two people. I'm not triggered. I'm saying that both sexes deserve equality before the law. The timeline for opting out of parenthood for men is being more cautious about where his seeds land. The tim…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 02:48 AM
4

Similar arguments were made against abortion. Do you have the same opinion on that?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 02:42 AM
4

True, it's not entirely equal, but we should make it as equal as we can.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 02:37 AM
8

Either wrap it up or shut up about women trapping you and take responsibility in the shadow of time you have the control and not get her pregnant Let's flip that, shall we? Either wear an IUD or shut up about men impregnating you and take responsibility while you have control and don't get pregnant. You want men to have stricter rules, less autonomy, and more obligations than women. You are a sexist hypocrite.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 02:35 AM
5

Do you support a ban on abortions? To paraphrase you, if she didn't want to get pregnant, she shouldn't have had unprotected sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 02:17 AM
3

It's about sex equality. If the woman is allowed to decide, during the pregnancy, that she doesn't want to accept parental responsibility, then the man should have the same autonomy. Y'know, equal rights, and all that. Now, to be clear, I'm not saying that a man should make that choice. If one of my mates were in that situation, I would definitely argue against it. But, if she gets that choice, then he should, too. At the very least, the law should say that women who get pregnant as a result of …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 02:14 AM
7

I am not asking for any authority over the question of whether or not she has an abortion. That should be entirely her choice. But, if she is allowed to decide during the pregnancy that she doesn't want to become a parent, then the man should also have the same autonomy; he should be allowed to decide, during the pregnancy, whether or not he wants to take on parental responsibility. Your flippant dismissal of 'if you don't want to risk getting someone pregnant, you should get snipped or stay abs…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 02:09 AM
1

What you describe as 'pick-me behaviour' is what normal people do, whereas some of your 'usual' behaviour carries significant red flags. For example, you talk about how you would normally not use commitment-minded language because you don't want him to think he 'has you'. That kind of manipulative bullshit is a massive red flag, and if you can't see that, then you need professional help.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/23 11:49 AM
1

No, that's not even remotely true. You're stuck on the assumption that government works like a business. Arguing that the government just wants to increase taxes and cut costs is such a massive oversimplification, leaving out so many crucial details, that it does more harm than good. To put it another way, a person who knows nothing at all about government would be better informed than someone who listens to you. Getting back on topic, the vast majority of the women who want to receive sperm are…
/r/MensRights24/07/23 06:34 AM
1

The government is not a monolithic entity. It is a conglomeration of multiple competing interest groups, many of whom have overlapping or contradictory areas of interest.
/r/MensRights23/07/23 06:11 AM
1

If anything, the trend will go the other way. If governments allow women to violate sperm donation contracts by demanding money, that will cause men to be far less willing to sign up as sperm donors, thereby creating a significant shortage, which those women really don't want.
/r/MensRights22/07/23 12:48 PM
1

This is exactly why it needs to be done through legislation, not through contracts or courts. That way, even the holy grail of breakthrough arguments will never have even the slightest hope of winning.
/r/MensRights22/07/23 11:58 AM
1

There's actually a very simple solution to this. Instead of just having a contract, it can actually be written into law. Some countries do that, with an actual legal distinction between a sperm donor and a normal father. Frankly, as an outsider looking in, this is another of those things where it just amazes me how much bullshit Americans are willing to put up with. And then they call themselves the 'land of the free'.
/r/MensRights22/07/23 05:23 AM
5

It certainly isn't all of us. I oppose Islam because I'm a liberal.
/r/MensRights26/04/23 07:16 PM
3

I'm talking about rape.
/r/MensRights22/03/23 09:06 PM
3

Rape isn't always about physically overpowering someone. It can use emotional or psychological coercion.
/r/MensRights22/03/23 07:08 PM
5

are the penetrators during sex (or rape). So? It doesn't matter who's penetrating, what matters is who made the decision. It's entirely possible for a woman to rape a man.
/r/MensRights22/03/23 07:02 PM
8

I'd hardly call that a joke.
/r/MensRights22/03/23 06:57 PM
5

Yeah, she non-consensually penetrated herself using his penis.
/r/PussyPass30/12/22 09:26 PM
2

Reproductive autonomy. A woman is allowed to decide during pregnancy whether or not she wants to become a parent. By contrast, a man is forced to stick with whatever decision was made before the pregnancy started, even if it wasn't his decision.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 06:16 AM
17

I'd say drafting isn't the answer. Volunteers make for better soldiers.
/r/MensRights21/10/22 08:38 PM
17

Some women are stronger than some men, so recruits should be assessed on individual merits.
/r/MensRights21/10/22 08:02 PM
2

The phrase "Blood is thicker than water" is an abbreviation of "The blood of shared hardship is thicker than the water of the womb", meaning that the people you have shared experiences with are more important than people who you just happen to be related to by an accident of birth. So it actually means the exact opposite of what you think it means. It's almost funny how phrases get flipped like that. They did the same with bootstraps and bad apples.
/r/MensRights21/10/22 07:24 PM
3

Yeah, that's probably the worst aspect of it. If he didn't give free and informed consent for the sex, then he definitely didn't consent to becoming a parent. To clarify, my caveat about "the vast majority of women" was based on the fact that most abortions happen for reasons other than medical necessity.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 02:56 AM
11

This is the thing with abortion rights; if women are allowed to decide that they don't want to become parents, then men should be allowed to decide that they don't want to become parents. And, before anyone says "well, he should have decided that before having sex", that argument would also apply to the vast majority of women who get abortions.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 07:28 PM
1

And I completely agree that women should have the right to choose, as long as men also have the right to choose.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 10:33 PM
1

And yet, every day, fathers are forced to pay child support for children they never consented to making.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 03:42 AM
1

No, in most jurisdictions, the mother is believed as the default, and if the man believes that it's not his child, the burden of proof is shifted onto him. In some jurisdictions, he will still have to pay child support even if he can prove that he's not the father. But it's not about paternity, it's about consent. Even if it is his child, in terms of paternity, he shouldn't have to pay child support if he didn't consent to becoming a parent.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 01:19 AM
2

It's one of the most misunderstood phrases on the internet. Toxic masculinity is when a man has ideas about masculinity which harm himself or other men. It is not when a man has ideas about masculinity which harm woman. For example, if a man dies of an infection because "real men don't need to see a doctor", that's toxic masculinity. Or if a guy with depression tries to talk about it, and if his friend tells him to take a concrete pill and harden the fuck up, that's toxic masculinity. On the oth…
/r/MensRights29/09/22 09:03 PM
1

The point is, they are still legally obligated to pay child support. Women are allowed to back out of parenthood, men aren't.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 06:03 PM
3

Of course it does. But letting the bad person win is immoral.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 07:47 AM
7

That's easy for you to say. In some areas, a woman who gets pregnant has a legal right to decide that she doesn't want to become a parent. Some jurisdictions allow that, some don't, some have recently decided to stop allowing it. To my knowledge, there are no jurisdictions which give men the same right.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 07:46 AM
1

This is a perfect example of why my support for women having the right to a biological abortion is conditional upon men having the right to a financial abortion. If it's wrong to force someone to become a parent, then it's wrong to force someone to become a parent.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 07:35 AM
2

This is why every marriage contract should have a highly detailed exit clause.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 07:58 PM
5

I almost feel sorry for the Russian army officers, who will have to wear extra plates in the back of their vests. Almost.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/22 11:38 PM
3

Good.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/09/22 07:52 AM
8

By that logic, we should never have allowed genetic evidence to be used for any crime. Once people learn that there will be mandatory genetic testing, you can expect the rate of people starting a pregnancy by cheating to go down quite quickly.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/09/22 07:51 AM
17

It may not be a thing in your personal experience, but I've seen it happen. I've experienced it. When I was in high school, I was sexually harassed by three gay students for about two and a half years. I only bothered reporting it twice, because both times I was told it was "no big deal" and that I should just "see the funny side of it". The Year 10 Dean actually used the exact phrase "boys will be boys, it's just what they do". So, while it may not have happened to you, it does happen.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/22 05:26 AM
3

Yes, that's exactly the problem; the body must be buried intact, but some people need organ replacements. That creates a significant supply-and-demand discrepancy, which, as is so often the case, incentivises dodgy stuff
/r/MensRights20/07/22 10:16 AM
9

Because the law is sexist. I've heard abortion rights people say "just because someone consented to sex, doesn't mean they consented to becoming a parent". Well, I completely agree, on the condition that it applies equally to men and women.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 11:01 AM
23

It's not just that. Since abortion was legalised (and, it still is in some countries, but for the purposes of this discussion we're focusing on the US), women have had the right to cancel their prospective parenthood after the pregnancy has already started. Men have never had that right. Sure, there will be some people who say "Well, if he didn't want to become a parent, he shouldn't have had sex", but of course that kind of logic is one of the most common arguments used against abortion. I just…
/r/MensRights29/06/22 01:25 AM
2

"Currently, men have no say once the zygote exists." And that is exactly the issue here. Once the zygote exists, the woman has a right to cancel her involvement, but the man doesn't.
/r/MensRights23/06/22 10:04 PM
2

Depends. Some roles mostly need smarts, but some roles still require physical strength.
/r/MensRights23/06/22 10:02 PM
4

Oh, I definitely agree that it's good to avoid the more toxic groups, but I just don't think that's a reason to move away from leftism as a whole.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/22 12:43 AM
10

If pro-male people leave the Left, then the Left will trend more towards anti-male. Don't exacerbate the very issue you're complaining about.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/06/22 09:59 AM
5

It's there now.
/r/MensRights09/05/22 08:06 PM
5

Mass genital mutilation event. FTFY.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 09:52 PM
7

Yes, that's the method by which the aforementioned lesson can be taught.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/05/22 10:52 AM
17

That result just shows that the judge is corrupt. IF it's true that a person is too rich to understand the difference between right and wrong, then the correct response would be to relieve them of their wealth so that they can be taught the required lessons.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/05/22 08:29 AM
4

It's not that I can't afford it, it's "why should I spend money on something I can get for free?". I don't buy bottled water for the sake reason.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/03/22 09:08 AM
1

"she"
/r/MensRights19/03/22 10:45 PM
2

"women and children make up the majority of the two-million people who have fled" Yeah, because, as a general rule of thumb, the men are staying behind to fight. It's amazing how far they can distort the narrative without technically saying anything false. It's like that time when they said "Almost a quarter of homeless people are women".
/r/MensRights12/03/22 02:06 AM
4

If he wasn't aware that she had an STD, and if that would've been a hard no for him had he known, then it would mean that he did not give free and properly informed consent, which would mean that, actually, she raped him.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 07:08 AM
8

So then we should be encouraging more men to be gay, to help with supply and demand.
/r/MensRights06/03/22 06:48 PM
1

I mean, she's kinda got a point. It's not like she was the one who decided to invade Ukraine.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/03/22 09:55 AM
1

Did you rinse the soap off? I remember one time I was washing my face, and I somehow forgot to rinse off the soap, and my face looked a bit flaky the next day. Not sure if it's the same with penises, but in my experience as long as you give it a good rinse the soap won't be there long enough to cause a problem.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 09:31 PM
2

When I was growing up in New Zealand, we didn't have Boy Scouts or Girl Scouts, we just had Scouts. This kind of pointless, manufactured outrage is an embarrassment for the sub.
/r/MensRights09/02/22 11:39 PM
-4

The phrase "toxic masculinity" is perhaps one of the most commonly misinterpreted phrases out there. If a man has toxic masculinity, that does not mean that he is behaving in a way which harms woman (although that may be a side-effect). Toxic masculinity refers to the attitudes which harm that man himself, or sometimes men in general. The classic example is the man who tries to self-medicate, and ends up getting really sick, because "real men don't need to go to the doctor, I'll be fine". Or the…
/r/MensRights20/01/22 11:23 AM
1

Of course, feminists probably think they're the ones telling the truth.
/r/MensRights19/01/22 06:40 PM
1

By that, not only all ideologies (including MRA), but also political affiliations would be considered religions.
/r/MensRights19/01/22 06:33 AM
-1

That makes as much sense as claiming that the words food and drink are interchangeable, and that the word "food" is just a word invented by recovering alcoholics who want to look down on people who drink. And, do you have anything to back up your assertion that the word "ideology" was invented by ideologues for the purpose of being able to have a religious-style system by another name? Because, from what I've seen, there are quite a few people who use the word without following one.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 10:30 PM
1

So what, according to you, defines religion as opposed to ideology?
/r/MensRights18/01/22 09:57 PM
0

It's certainly not just my personal interpretation. If you've never had the difference between usage and meaning explained to you, then that says a lot more about you than it does about me.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 09:17 PM
0

No, that's usage. Take decimation, for example. The meaning is 'to destroy one tenth'. It even has that deci part in there. But it's commonly used to mean 'destroy the vast majority.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 08:23 PM
-15

Buddhism is kinda in the grey area between a religion and a philosophy. They say they don't have deities, but some sects functionally worship Buddha. It's important to remember that dictionaries are descriptive, not prescriptive. They don't tell you what the word means, they tell you what people commonly use it to mean, which is why dictionaries often give multiple, sometimes contradictory, definitions. The quote you've provided, for example, is so vague that it could make patriotism, Q-Anon, an…
/r/MensRights18/01/22 08:06 PM
-15

Nope. The difference between the two is that religion has to have a god or gods, and involves some kind of belief in an afterlife (among other characteristics). Feminism doesn't have that.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 06:58 PM
-12

No, it's an ideology. If you stretch words too far, it'll dilute their meaning so much that, when you actually need to use the word, it won't carry the same communicative force.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 06:48 PM
2

One of the common phrases among abortion-rights activists is "Consenting to sex doesn't mean consenting to parenthood". Well, the same should apply for men.
/r/MensRights17/01/22 10:32 AM
0

It depends. We have to remember that sexual assault is defined by intent. So, if you kick a guy in the balls for the purpose of causing pain, then that's assault, but not sexual assault. But, if you kick a guy in the balls because you derive sexual pleasure from it, then that is sexual assault.
/r/MensRights14/12/21 11:55 PM
2

https://youtu.be/hhCWw0E_mVY There ya go.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/08/21 11:37 PM
1

Yeah, I never thought I'd say it, but Kanye was right.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/07/21 12:54 AM
3

There are two points you're missing here. Firstly, whilst the average man is stronger than the average woman, there are some women who are stronger than some men. If you base military recruitment/draft/conscription on the question of gender, you'll get a less effective military than you would if you assessed each recruit on their individual suitability. Secondly, whilst physical strength is important (and I absolutely believe that fitness tests should be the same for men and women), not every ro…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/07/21 12:02 AM
-1

Eve if we say that rape requires a penis to be inserted into a vagina, that still allows a woman to be charged with rape, because she could be the one causing the insertion. It's not that the prosecutors can't charge women with rape. It's that they don't.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/06/21 12:28 PM
4

Segregating education by gender is just kicking the can down the road until they leave school. They need to be taught how to behave around each other.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/11/20 12:16 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter