TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ToneyBits Archive

View 0 posts and 185 comments by ToneyBits on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
19

I legitimately had to screenshot this comment. "Non-toxic man" leaving a toxic comment. I swear, most blue pillers have an extreme lack of self-awareness.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 05:18 PM
2

Again, you've made it about you. Maybe look up the definition of solipsism, and the irony will dawn on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 08:30 PM
3

Don’t make it personal. You’re words on a screen. I don’t care about you. Female solipsism on full display here. You’re a joke. And a stupid joke at that. The irony is really lost on you, eh?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 08:10 PM
0

How many people are willing to risk being trapped in a sexually incompatible relationship these days? This directly implies that the sex needs to be good. This leaves 2-3 options... A human dildo they can ride A human sex machine they can get pumped/licked by. It's pretty obvious women want more than fingers and a tongue, or there would probably be a lot more lesbian couples.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 11:06 AM
1

Does this imply that cock size, stamina, and ability to be controlled are the most important attributes?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 10:40 AM
1

Yeah, I can tell, cause your comment history is you nonstop trolling in here. I can even tell you're high enough SMV that it stunted your development. You commented about NASA developing pens for space (to solve the problem of free floating graphite from a pencil) as if it were a bad thing. The cosmonauts switched to using said pens (because of the free floating graphite problem). You're genuinely a brick wall to talk to, lmao. The frequency of your posts even makes me think you're a bot.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 09:36 PM
1

Legitimately trolling, lol. Is this sub modded?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 09:29 PM
1

Lmao again, condescending for no reason. I've been happily off the market with my SO for almost a decade now. You're genuinely here to troll and make fun of people, and I'm not sure why. Are you sure everything's alright at home?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 09:24 PM
1

Hahaha you quote fucking BILL BURR! A guy notorious for making fun of people! A wealthy comedian detached from the realities of dating. That quote is like saying "location is only important for a restaurant if you haven't run a restaurant before" ...huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 09:18 PM
1

Your arrogance and condescending nature are hilarious. Are you suggesting that SMV can not be calculated, or are you suggesting that it does not exist? I'm assuming it's the former, so in that case, what would you change about the calculation? You are the one who desires a better formula, after all.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 09:10 PM
1

Lol, I'm honestly not sure what you're trying to prove. That there's no database of people being rated? That there's no hard numbers behind it? The dateless people you're making fun of are literally the lowest on the SMV totem pole. Unlike you, some guys don't get to "try out the girl they're not attracted to". Like I said (which you keep choosing to ignore, ffs). Go use a dating app like Tinder or Hinge and see what your match rate is without a bio. Use that as your looks value. Add a bio and s…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 08:38 PM
1

Yeah, other than telling you to change to flair to blue pill, there isn't much I can tell you. In fact, your love story in and of itself is pretty red pilled. -personality rather than looks failed -personality turned into looks -looks turned into personality (married) Looks are more important when determining SMV for short-term prospects, and the more short-term prospects a person has, the higher their chance at long-term prospects. Obviously, looks are subjective, but when talking about market …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 08:12 PM
1

True blue pilled rhetoric. Believe what you want to believe. I truly don't care. It makes no difference to me or my life. I'm just trying to explain reality. “Oh my personality matrix to maxed out to help with my looks rating (number not shown) which means my SMV matches the girl in the blue dress with the push up bra!” I'm not sure what you're trying to get at tbh.. Does a homeless hooker have the same value as a working graduate? Obviously not. What about two working graduates? How do we choos…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 07:47 PM
-1

What? Man, I could see how you see all pills are dumb if you don't understand them, but that kind of leaves you as a blue piller. It's very simple through self-reflection and real-life experience to determine your base looks value. You can only really move a few points up or down through self-care. This then gets modified by the other 2 parts of the triangle, wealth and personality. Wealth is easy to quantify. Personality is quantified by how many boxes you check that the other person wants. Obv…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 07:23 PM
-1

Do you know what "projection" means?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 07:11 PM
-2

This was probably the most red vs blue pill experience I've seen as it pertains to the matrix. "The pills represent a choice between remaining in a state of blissful ignorance (blue) or accepting a painful reality (red)." -Britannica You remain in blissful ignorance while the red piller faces reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 05:11 PM
-2

Knowing your value when talking to someone who doesn't in and of itself increases your value. Sorry, but there's no "SMV" database. You can try using match rate on dating apps as a substitute.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 04:34 PM
0

That must be the women or the other bosses talking.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 04:30 PM
-2

Go up to however many number of people and ask them to rate you 1-10. There's your physical value. Next, add (or subtract) the number of standard deviations away your income is from the average income in your area. Boom! Adjusted SMV!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 04:26 PM
0

Being firm and decisive at work. (bitch) Aka "asshole" or "dickhead" if they're a male.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 04:20 PM
1

A boring "hot" man is an easy catch A "hot" man who pretends to share your values will make you tingle more than the ugly man who actually shares your values. Repeat above for interests/hobbies. "Hot" man must show enough interest. Ugly man's interest will never spark "chemistry"
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/23 06:24 PM
2

Agree to disagree, I suppose. If the activities and dialogue require absence to maintain authenticity, then it stands to reason that said activities and dialogue are not authentic. There's a large difference between the spouse being invited and saying no versus the spouse not being invited.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/23 07:43 PM
1

Activities like clubbing or a nice vacation? With all of their single friends? Are we talking about the same things here?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/23 07:09 PM
2

How can you read my comment and focus even harder on your own circumstances?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/23 06:39 PM
1

You're once again misconstruing the original comment from this thread with the way you perceived it. If your SO does not get along with your friend group or you don't get along with theirs, then I have trouble understanding how a friendship grew between the two of you when there's a friendship incompatibility between the people you enjoy and the person you enjoy at home. It's as simple as that. "You're invited, but don't have to join" is much different than "you are not invited and you can not j…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/23 06:06 PM
0

Really? I think it's much more unpleasant to have your significant other hanging out with people who don't want to hang out with you. I guess that's the life you desire.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/23 05:14 PM
1

Woah, there... You're changing the scenarios entirely now.. Suddenly, it's a group of mutual friends and not "girls night"? Maybe you can explain why same sex friendships seem to change when someone brings a member of the opposite sex? Why would these dynamics change when the other sex is present? Is there something they are hiding?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/23 05:10 PM
–

If I wanted to go out on a boys trip alone? Or clubbing on my own? Yeah, she should say no. If your friends can't enjoy the company of your SO, then they shouldn't enjoy your company either.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/23 04:06 PM
1

Why is it your responsibility to ensure that your single friends find a mate? More importantly, why does your partner need to be absent for you to help your friends find a mate? Or if it's not about finding a mate, then how does having your choice of man there ruin the friendship dynamic? Why does the event become "less fun" with a man there? Will there be no other men at the gathering? Please help us to understand
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/23 03:56 PM
1

What are you taking about when you say 'claim her'? Women also "claim" their man, his resources, and his protection. She enters holy matrimony with him having these expectations in mind. What protection do men provide on a day-to-day basis? I have trouble with this one. Why do we assume the man needs to protect the woman every day? It's more about his readiness and willingness to protect. It acts as an aura against potential violent offenders. It's not like he needs to perform some heroic act ev…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/23 05:58 PM
4

Why do they need to marry? Why would their harem need the title of "wife" if we're all just being eugenicists?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/23 04:29 PM
–

What about scenarios like young love, where both parties are growing into adults? Do you believe children should avoid romance until after all of their schooling is complete? Or can children grow with the pain of romance and learn to parent each other?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/23 12:46 AM
1

PPD men think that women get alpha widowed by Chad, but they are wrong. It's the man she has had the best sex with. She and many others... hence the term alpha widowed, as Chad likes to spin plates. Maybe you were talking about Brad? I think he's a serial monogamist.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/23 12:13 AM
2

Imagine a really mid-tier 6/10 woman perusing the bar every so often to try a new man. All of the regulars know her. She made one with Chad, and then Brad got his turn. Slowly, but surely, like the middle school boy that asked every girl out on the same day, our Bachelorette works her way through her choice of men at the pub. Imagine this Bachelorette would picture herself in a nuclear family lifestyle with these men. She would do anything to keep them around. She begins to realize that they wer…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 01:43 PM
1

First, you say, "There was no reason for video games to become male dominated" Now you're agreeing with me that it's male dominated because men were and still are more likely to choose that form of entertainment. Not only this, but you DARVO yet again with the use of the RVO portion. Very awesome! So, let's try again. What genres are we missing, or what gameplay elements are missing for women to want to compete in the most popular online games? Or is it safe to assume that women typically fall i…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/23 05:11 PM
1

So gamers became mostly men because of the way games were made and marketed? Or gaming markets targeted men because men were more likely to play? Obviously, these reasons feed into each other, but your "prime example" of a male dominated profession/hobby says more about the consumers than the producers. Especially in 2023, where innovation in each game genre is now very sparse. You can demonize the porn industry for using women to create an escape for horny coomer boys and man-children. I dislik…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/23 02:51 PM
1

Again, zero empathy. You only show sympathy. Again, a deflection DARVO specialist.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/23 01:36 PM
2

…by using images which kept white soldiers sexually aroused and frustrated because the assumption was that white soldiers could use a little more aggression. Excellent non answer! Question avoided! I didn’t say I was upset, you’re projecting. Neither did I. Thanks for projecting after projecting. I said I was disgusted. IDGAF about what men are thinking. Exactly why it's disgusting. I pointed out that the male gaze is a product of the male perspective. Water makes things wet. Gravity makes objec…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/23 01:16 PM
2

What I got from this is that men with controlled sex drives display heroic traits. Why would I be upset that the powers in charge discovered how to make our fighters fight harder? Why would we want the opposite? Even more, why would we want to replace them with women? Or why would we want women performing active combat duty with a high risk of death? You're upset that men who trained to fight for a very large amount of time were imagining their sex counterparts. I'm upset that you care more abou…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/23 12:55 PM
5

So what video games would women make? Why in 2023, with all of these easy to use game engines readily available, have women not made a game for women? Why are competitive queues (a place you never visit) typically mostly men? Why are competitive mmorpg guilds mostly men? War sells because it's in the blood of men, so I ask again: which video games do women choose in 2023, with every genre releasing near identical copies of themselves as "the new game"? What genre or what gameplay elements are we…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/23 12:24 PM
2

I can't imagine being stuck on a battlefield for fucking months, risking your life constantly, only to be remembered for painting a woman on your plane and seeking a few moments of escape. It's fucking disgusting the way you view our war heroes. You do not deserve the protection that they provided.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/23 11:57 AM
2

TL;DR prostitution is the oldest profession
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/23 11:49 AM
3

Please explain how you would have marketed video games and pornography to women. How are you going to market war and hyper competitiveness to women?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/23 11:47 AM
1

So what's wrong with what I said? A woman chooses sex and birth control options, except in cases where her options were stolen (rape). I'm embarrassed for women who get pregnant when they don't want to. It typically shows a lack of care and awareness. I'm embarrassed for you for defending such women and attempting to take intellectual high ground because of an elective you took in high school, lmao. Don't want a child? Avoid rape and avoid pregnancy. Very simple concept.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 12:16 AM
–

I don't think that's possible anymore, unfortunately. You literally have to not show up to fail school nowadays. Teachers need to put an extraordinary amount of effort to fail students. Most of the time, they just pass the kids along. You must have been one of those.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/23 07:49 PM
–

It's no longer a logical fallacy when the debate is about personal experiences. Resort to deflection when challenged.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/23 07:47 PM
–

This reads like it was written by someone who has never made a woman orgasm. You all are trying to create a caricature of a man who doesn’t exist I lol'd tbh. Go make a woman cum.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/23 05:26 PM
–

You learn from multiple experiences with the same woman. I’m not sure why it’s a difficult concept to grasp
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/23 04:06 PM
–

Premise 1: Rape is illegal Premise 2: Sex makes babies Conclusion: don't have sex if you don't want a baby
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/23 04:01 PM
2

There's evolutionary benefits for women being with more than one man too; https://www.google.com/amp/s/am Sooo.. Are you saying AWALT is true? Or is this more a Freudian slip of your own character?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/23 03:40 PM
1

I love how you dance around things instead of being direct.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 12:07 AM
1

Must be why it's lasted so long. You've got some very big brain takes.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 10:43 PM
1

Nvm, you're right. I embrace our future matriarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 10:08 PM
1

Sounds based
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 10:05 PM
1

You can't even say what's wrong with it. Rather hilarious imo
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 10:04 PM
1

Everyone wants to be physically attracted to their partner Change your tag to black pill lmaoo As I've said your definition is not consistent and seems only to insult or elevate. Alpha good. Beta bad. That's Strong vs weak Confident vs shy Smart vs dumb This shit isn't rocket science, but you're making it out to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 08:17 PM
1

Haha, you are either very disingenuous or very daft to need a straight answer. Typically, those who defend Christianity will call themselves Christians, yes. I'm an imperfect Christian, like many. And you?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 08:12 PM
1

We all have different interests and goals and values and we choose our partners accordingly. We don't choose based on physical strength or dominance or anything like that. So you didn't care at all about your partners looks? I think you'll find you're in a very small minority if that's the case. At the end of the day, we all know what alpha means. I just find it hilarious how you skirt around that. The fact that we can even debate it and you know what it's referring to is proof that it exists co…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 08:08 PM
1

Disingenuous again! Color me surprised!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 07:55 PM
1

Seems like a large pill to swallow. I guess some swallow it for God. It's funny how you choose Christianity as your target. What's wrong with Christianity?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 07:36 PM
1

I honestly don't know how to get it through to you, lol. You refuse any example I give where we select people based on their redeeming qualities. Those with the highest amount of redeeming qualities are attributed the title "alpha". What more is there to say? We could go deeper into the physical manifestation of dominance, or we can abstract the manifestation of dominance due to technology and the evolution of weaponry for self-defense. So Bob is supportive. Why do you prefer Bob over Jake? What…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 07:33 PM
1

"Huh? What's going on?" Disingenuous again. I expected nothing else.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 06:33 PM
1

Enjoy your blue pill 🤠
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 06:31 PM
1

Men that can't compete don't play in the league. Why do we create a separate league for women? Is that not a gendered handout? Why is equality only sought when it's an advantage?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 06:30 PM
1

Ohhhhh ok! So equality until women need a handout? Sounds fair to me!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 05:55 PM
1

Enjoy being beta bucks! Bye felicia!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 05:48 PM
1

How can you delineate between them? Do you just throw them all into the rack and let them stack themselves? How do you decide which to throw onto the stack first? Another disingenuous analogy in an attempt to say "I don't rate people" when you very clearly do. Why don't we look at the real world? How are people selected for jobs? Do we just choose at random? Pick a name out of a hat?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 05:47 PM
1

Ohhh.. so the ideal life for both sides is to become beta bux? Cool!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 04:39 PM
1

No. I'm trying to understand how you can compare people without true/false statements. Care to elaborate?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 04:38 PM
1

But you can't even judge them holistically because there is no alpha/beta dichotomy. There is no true or false, according to you. Everyone is equal.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 03:37 PM
1

Ahh, so you help those who created bad situations instead of creating a good situation for yourself? Are you a female beta bux? I didn't think those existed, but then again, I wouldn't be surprised if they did.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 03:36 PM
1

How can you rate people without having an ideal that tends towards "alpha"? You are so disingenuous that I'm beginning to think you're a chat bot.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 03:12 PM
1

Huh.. I wonder what terminology we could use for people who are not financially or romantically lucky? Perhaps the term "beta" would describe them? What about successful people who disregard children and become self-centered? Perhaps we call those "sigmas"
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 03:10 PM
1

So we should take away women's sports? Women are not lesser than men, so let's have co-ed sports and watch the women win!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 03:02 PM
1

Start here: -Instead of being a charming chivalrous masculine man they try and manipulate women into sleeping with them. They no longer look after women. Its all about trying to get sex rather than courting and treating women with respect. They are damaging the younger population of women by using these women and subsequently women turn to transactional relationships where atleast the get money for sleeping with men. It begins with boys being told, "Just be yourself". The first lie told by both …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 02:59 PM
1

"You can't rate people by looks or even brains. You must be ugly physically and mentally." Like I said: stupid narcissistic woman
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 02:39 PM
1

Thank you for not reproducing. Very successful life!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 02:37 PM
1

Living your life how you want is success. So the richest people are the most successful, therefore the most alpha? When my partner and I met we were both in school, he was a pizza delivery guy. I needed a partner who had ambition to match my own. Hahahahhahahahahahajahah do you hear the fucking reality you're denying? Ugly woman starts making money and picks up the "ambitious" pizza delivery guy??? Hahhaha it really doesn't get any better, tbh I can't help it if I'm more successful than most men…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 11:46 AM
1

Can you explain how it's stupid to point out the ability to make comparisons? You're literally closing your eyes, plugging your ears, and screaming "LALALALALA" to avoid shit you don't want to hear. I wouldn't be surprised if a career woman like you is completely low-mid tier in regards to looks. It's the only explanation I can come up with as a reason for you denying reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 11:40 AM
1

Ahh, that must be why you singled out my choice of the word "mate" rather than addressing the coherent point that was made. Tally ho then, good luck, m8.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 07:17 PM
1

Congrats! I read through your profile. I think we live in different realities if not having children is a "success". Or perhaps you think society should end? Or who should be having children? Unsuccessful people? You are monetarily successful. That much is obvious. You also display the common hypergamy trope. You made it clear you won't date someone well below your financial means. You literally wrote off the "beta" money makers because you desired an "alpha" income (you can avoid the words, but…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 07:16 PM
0

Correction: you don't take anyone seriously that doesn't share your views
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 05:49 PM
1

How long have you been with your partner?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 05:49 PM
2

So men should be looking for sugar momma opportunities now? Those seem much rarer than sugar daddy opportunities. It's well known that women typically date up. It boggles my mind that a woman would want to fully reverse roles with men. They simply seek the benefits of affluent men and their lifestyles. It's truly a modern problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 05:48 PM
1

Very blue pilled take. No pill is blue pill, btw
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 05:38 PM
1

Hahaha, it's like you're understanding while refusing to understand. Yes, we can determine who has "better" traits in some areas. Your refusal to accept the terminology used does not excuse the fact that we can compare and contrast many physical and mental attributes. A mate who exhibits the most of these positive features as a whole is what we idealize as the "alpha"
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 05:37 PM
0

It goes beyond wolves. Your confirmation bias is keeping your mind closed and focused on the wolves.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 05:28 PM
0

PUAs do teach you how to read the room. Please go do some more reading on how to seduce women as a man. You're further proving the point of "don't ask fish how to catch fish". These young men are told, "Just be yourself" when the real advice they need is "become a man"
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 03:44 PM
1

You really hit the nail on the head with this one
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 03:21 PM
1

Google says otherwise
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 03:19 PM
1

How many women work on our infrastructure? Drilling oil, building homes, laying asphalt on roads, etc. Women would not have nearly the number of opportunities that they do without the bulk of it being set up by men.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 03:14 PM
1

You've never met a beautiful woman who has the whole package of both beauty and brains? I feel bad for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 03:07 PM
0

A man can have an alpha body with beta brain and vice versa. You're absolutely skirting around the concept.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 03:04 PM
2

You're clearly not able to think or get your thoughts across. Who is Kyle? Can you set the background for people? Kyle from the trailer park has 7 kids? You mean he became the "alpha" sex icon for lustful women in the trailer park? Thanks for proving the point! What about Jimmy? Jimmy has 3 kids with his wife, and they've been saving up! Jimmy is the "alpha" family man, but he is soon to graduate to become the "beta" family man once he takes his family to the suburban neighborhood. Life is not b…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 03:00 PM
0

How do they differ?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 02:56 PM
4

For no reason?? No. The aggression quite clearly came from pointing out feminist hypocrisy. Men and women BOTH objectify each other, but as pointed out, WOMEN get relief from their behavior, while men are chastised. You're an absolutely disgusting, disingenuous, vile creature.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 02:19 PM
1

why would i want to go out of my way to have a real-time discussion with someone who has repeatedly engaged in bad faith? Weird hearing the word faith from someone who hates religion so much. You replied again, which makes me feel like we can have a much more fruitful discussion through voice. I'll send you a PM
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 11:04 PM
1

Hahahaha you wrote me an essay that I won't read. Since you love the USSR so much, why don't you go live there? Oh, wait..
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 09:36 PM
1

Yeah. There's nothing remotely ironic about that. I can condemn the atrocities of Marxist-Leninist societies and still advocate for a stateless, classless, moneyless society unlike, say, most conservative capitalists are unable to acknowledge the atrocities of capitalism and Western civilization in their uncritical, brainless defense of it. Imagine condemning the free world on a device that exists solely because of the free world. Not only this, but you can't see the irony of wanting to help peo…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 12:45 PM
1

But there really is not a new woman, just a few cultural tweaks. I am not sure that the liberated woman is significantly happier than the old fashioned unliberated women of the past. I disagree. The modern woman displays much more intelligence than women of the past. I believe in liberation of women, equality for everyone but why aren’t the women happier and the men are definitely less happy despite their modern games. Perhaps the unhappiness is all just from declining wages caused by cheap fore…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 10:31 PM
1

No, you're mistaken. I prose a hypothetical, and you can't think centuries into the future without thinking about how you can spread your political ideologies. You say conservatives are terrible people, but you're a commie. Oh, the irony. I use the Holy Bible for my fundamental axioms. What do you use?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 10:19 PM
1

Conservatives only read hot garbage when they need to understand their opponents' talking points. I don't need to read your garbage because you refuse to think.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 08:28 PM
1

So what does the woman want, a short man who will not try to replace her with a younger model or a tall man that will replace her with a younger model when she gets old? Hahahaha again, you imply that women are stuck with monkey brains that only think about sex and babies. The modern woman wants the man who will not replace her. You ignored my question, so I think this conversation is fruitless. You do not argue in good faith.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 08:26 PM
1

I can't read this fucking communist nonsense. Good luck in life.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 07:58 PM
1

I made an implication based on your implications. Why would short genes carry on if women only select tall men? Why would short genes carry on if short men are incapable of self-defense? You literally implied they can not defend themselves. It's rather ironic that people can say pit bulls were bred to be fighting dogs in such a short period of time, yet somehow humans can't evolve as quickly? Also, again, I'll mention adaptation, which is completely different from evolution. Humans are highly ad…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 07:56 PM
1

If I get this right, you're saying that dwarves have a higher mental capacity than tall people? It stands to reason that a genetic sequence that has a short gene would be compensated in some way, while the tall gene would survive through the nature of the animal kingdom. Is this correct? There is evolution, and there is adaptation. Are you also implying that women are unable to adapt because their brains are stuck in monkey/neanderthal/HG mode? You would think that every member of the physically…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 07:20 PM
3

If the clan turns on each other and start killing each other it is better to be married to a taller man that people are scared of. The clan? Wtf? This isn't prehistoric times, buddy. Most people in FPS games choose smaller characters for smaller hurt boxes. Being short is an advantage in the age of the firearm.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 12:27 PM
1

What is your proposal for replacing the c suite? A man who overthrows a bad executive will simply lead in their place with chivalry. They seek the C suite for the material gains for their family and to control the company how they think is best. My counter to your DARVO loaded question is why do we care that the C suite is mostly men? Feminism and misandry are the only answers I can come up with. To be more like you, I can say it's virulent women and the simps that support them. I assume that yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 05:04 PM
1

What is this net benefit you speak of? I would like to know more!
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 01:25 PM
1

If I read this correctly, women outnumber men in college across all studies. How about we break this down by individual study and find the real contributors? Most people really don't care about the plethora of journalists and women's studies majors being pumped out.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 01:21 PM
2

Somehow, the sexless men are withdrawn from your thoughts? The top dogs won't be upset, sure. The top dogs won't team up, sure. What about the rest of them? Why would they continue to fight each other instead of team up? I have your answer already: women.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 01:16 PM
1

You're analyzing primitive corpses and primitive societies as an anecdote against modern problems. Hell, you had to go as far as removing agriculture from our society to do so. Very disingenuous take, imo.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 01:11 PM
1

It actually makes a lot of sense. You either can not understand it or refuse to accept it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 01:08 PM
1

I imagine you hearing the "personal God" saying at church and taking it to mean we all get a different God. We all get a personal connection/relationship with the same God. Which 'God' do your worship that we would not like?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 01:06 PM
3

If you want to close your eyes and plug your ears, sure. I think even a child can point out that, on average, men have stronger muscles.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 12:56 PM
9

The inverse is usually posted on female only subs like TwoX. Women literally disengage and run when hearing discourse from men that they can't tolerate. If you try to communicate with them on the female subs, then you better agree with them, or you won't be there long.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 12:31 PM
1

In the words of a father figure, who you probably hate, "In order to be able to think, you have to risk being offensive." I'm fully aware that it's the corporate overlords. I'm simply philosophizing the full extent of women's labor contributions in society. The tables have not fully turned, but it's very obvious that women have been attempting to "flip the table and take their toys home..." with the main difference being that they file lawsuits instead of take their toys home. They desire to be …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 12:26 PM
1

I'm just pointing out the logical progression/evolution. Men grow muscle more easily and are more willing to risk their lives. For women, it's usually brain power or no power, lmao How long do you think blue-collar men will allow themselves to be bossed around by white-collar women before it's no longer a battle of wits?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 11:34 PM
2

At what age do those clumps of cells become self-aware? Should we consider them animals until that point?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 06:46 PM
1

What??? The improvement of self IS the reward.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 04:53 PM
0

What a brain-dead take with absolutely minimal root in reality. This is not how genetics works. My nephew has blue eyes, and both of his parents do not. Do you remember how this happens from science class?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 04:50 PM
2

Two children out of wedlock…. the horror Not being able to afford a good life for them is even worse. Having different fathers show up in the kids' lives is the real horror. Having them not know where they'll be next month. Having the kids mentally stuck on Maslow's base level of the hierarchy. Truly an absolute horror when you can stop thinking like a woman child and think from the perspective of a child with adult insights. Children raised out of wedlock statistically turn out worse than child…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 04:25 PM
1

Dating isn't men being better value...it's men trying to offer one off experiences to hack their way out of women's preferred mating strategy Hahahaha that's literally all relationships are. It's really no secret that a wife will get bored of her husband if he "stops dating her". Women prefer to monkey branch rather than build their man. Not only this, but as you said.. A man can invite a woman, and the woman will KNOW she won't be taking it further, but hey, free meal! Average men do not get th…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 04:11 PM
2

No, I am not a traditional woman. My fiance would fit that definition a little better, but she very much has modern tendencies. According to her sister, I am a man-child. Which is rather ironic, seeing how her sister has 2 kids out of wedlock and can barely pay her way through life. I had to assume she was using such vitriolic language out of spite/jealousy. I fully pay the rent and utility bills. I do my best to help out around the home. So, why was I called a man-child? Well, because I decided…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 03:40 PM
6

Trad women: ask for help with chores and receive it when needed have a stable father figure to help raise children choose whether to work or not and are much stricter with their hours stay monogamous with their partner are encouraged to have a productive career in society are not chained by the sins of the flesh dress modestly, but with a level of class that still turns heads receive validation and attention from many, but reserves her best self for her husband Modern women: can easily fall into…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 01:07 PM
1

Oh no... A man pays for the same size apartment as a woman, and the woman looks for the man renting a house. A man pays for more food to eat so that he can maintain the muscle mass that women are looking for. A man pays for an economy car, but the woman goes for the man with the luxury vehicle. If, somehow, by some miracle, this hypothetical woman decides, "I'll accept this date from an equal man" it is almost always the man paying his way through the shit tests of the woman. She "knows she can …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 12:48 PM
2

This is the most blue pilled take I've seen on this subreddit. You truly go to sleep believing what you want to think, huh? How "red pilled" is this new clique of yours that detached from TRP? You make them seem very successful with women. Very Andrew Tate-esque and mysterious. I wager they can brag of their conquests in a similar manner to him? Why have we not heard of this new clique that is so good with women?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 12:29 PM
1

This entire post ignores the fact that men traditionally pay for most dating related finances. It's entirely anecdotal. I see, though. A rich man can pick up a poor woman. A rich woman can pick up a poor man. A poor woman will abuse a poor man. Thanks for the insight.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 12:12 PM
1

Gold comes in many shapes and sizes. Judging by your username, you enjoy plastic?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 02:20 AM
0

Do women involve themselves equally in physical labor? Or are we destined for a matriarchy of white-collar women controlling blue-collar men?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 02:19 AM
1

I'm not saying you mentioned anything about it, but I find it odd how much we hear about the gender pay gap, yet you give us a hypothetical scenario of a woman doing better financially than a man. Really made me stop and think for a good while. Thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 02:16 AM
1

The bit about obeying God? Or the bit about obeying each other? I'm having trouble with understanding why you would hitch a man who does not want to obey you. It makes me think there is truth to the carousel and the wall.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 08:26 PM
1

How do your vows differ from the usual vows? What changes?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 08:02 PM
1

What do you define as minimal religion? Joint finances as in sharing bills? Or combining assets? Bank accounts first come to mind as the obvious example of combining assets. It seems you've removed the proverbial God/Angel from your shoulder when thinking from your own and others' perspectives. What percentage of men do you think are Godless? Also, do you seek a monogamous partner and a monogamous relationship? I'm wondering how you define and envision your expectations for marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 07:58 PM
1

Ahh, so you instantly disengage from religion, yet you seek a holy matrimony with a man? Or should I assume you're going to take them to the courthouse and avoid the religious ceremony? Marriage is just for the state to give you a tax break, right? How do you go about deciding your morals and defining your moral compass? I'm just trying to gain some perspective. People of God are not perfect, but they're much more predictable in their responses. Would you agree?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 07:25 PM
1

I'm suggesting you will find what you're looking for. The sins of the flesh hold both men and women captive. I suggest the Holy Bible as a moral compass. I also encourage you to attempt to think from a wider variety of men's perspectives.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 07:04 PM
1

You painted yourself that way. I made a comparison to TRP ideology in a subreddit meant for discussion about said red pill ideology (and its opposite). You self admitted to wanting to enjoy your Bachelorette days until you decide it's time to settle. You fit the AF/BB narrative almost to a T. I simply pointed it out.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 06:11 PM
1

This is the thought you have when thinking about parents sitting down with their kids? Do you think it's better when the school does it or something? Or do you have cognitive dissonance when thinking of mothering a child?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 04:25 PM
1

Of course, motherhood is harder than being childless. I should have been more specific with my use of Sherlock. It doesn't take a Sherlock level brain to realize kids are a hassle. It does take a Sherlock-esque brain to realize kids are delayed gratification that leads to higher life satisfaction when done properly. I switched the topic to you because you are enjoying your carousel time. I just found it funny and was wondering if you've read through TRP perspective on this. It made you super def…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 04:15 PM
1

AI conspiracy I guess you're the one without anecdotal experience here. huge lack of awareness You got that right maybe I'm just sane Sanity over safety. Sex as escapism and solipsism. Leading us to the fate of Rome. I choose vigilance over sanity. spy bot I said propaganda bot, not spy bot. Maybe this definition will help you to understand why a foreign country would want to sow seeds of discord between in-groups of the enemies populace. You're clearly one to never think about the VERY top men …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 04:05 PM
1

I honestly had a chuckle out of this. You literally ignored the "carousel" phase part of TRP ideology behind AF/BB or have not read it. Your description almost perfectly describes the scenario they lay out. Not only this, but you use deflection to avoid it after I point it out. Standard DARVO tactic.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 03:24 PM
1

I can tell you have more experience with PUAs from Tinder than Russian bots in video games. There's a literal war going on. To act like you can't see a reason behind it in the age of ChatGPT shows a huge lack of awareness.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 03:18 PM
1

Interesting, thanks. Mind if I ask when it started and the level of promiscuity you reached? Was it a legitimate "hoe phase" or more of a "catch and release until I find one I like"?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 02:31 PM
1

How can you describe signs of autism as "negative behavior" without throwing people with autism under the bus? "Weird and off-putting" is VERY different from "negative behavior" Care to elaborate? I'll do my best to avoid using autism from now on. It appears the medical definition will be changing names again soon.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 02:22 PM
1

This is most certainly NOT how you worded the comment I replied to. You labeled him as "vanilla" and your Tinder hookups as having better "kinks". Honestly, with the way most women speak of Tinder and the men on there, I get propaganda bot vibes from you. Almost every experience I read from women on Reddit is that Tinder is NOT a good place for women. How did you vet the plethora of guys at your fingertips for the ones that focused on you more? I'd also wager money that you were much more vocal …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 02:08 PM
2

I had to screenshot this interaction, tbh. AF/BB spotted in the wild, folks.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 02:01 PM
1

I self diagnose myself as partially autistic, and your line of thinking is literally what caused the word "retarded" to have to change from what it previously was: a medical definition. It literally does not matter what words we use. You will find them hateful even if we are not using a hateful tone. I could say the person was being weird and off-putting, and you will then turn that against me.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 01:59 PM
1

Procrastination of real-life studies and work. Unless mommy and daddy are going to support her for her whole life? I grew up in the melting pot of South Florida. "Normal" college people very quickly learn that the party types are not the study hard types. They're typically the "just scrape by" types. In fact, kids these days learn this in high school ffs. Sometimes, I have trouble wondering why some women are more easily chained to the sins of the flesh. Sometimes, it becomes blazingly obvious. …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 01:55 PM
2

The problem is the wide spectrum of autism disorders. People with very obvious symptoms get diagnosed more readily than people with only a few symptoms. There's nothing wrong with pointing out autistic behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 01:42 PM
1

Procrastination and self-indulgence. An inability to control the self.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 01:39 PM
1

Very "never having kids" woman response. I don't need to be Sherlock to understand that women who want kids know a lot more about delayed gratification.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 01:37 PM
1

Women will use the dicks lined up for them after they get hurt? Thanks for the insight.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 01:33 PM
1

When did your hoe phase stop, and why?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 01:32 PM
1

I read this as "my ex boyfriend wanted to treat me with respect during sex, but I like being tossed around like a meat bag" Thanks for the insight!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 01:30 PM
1

Your entire word salad can be summarized as "single middle class women are monkey branchers, and they won't pursue their equals"
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 01:28 PM
2

Both scenarios show an avoidance to real-life issues. Why do you respond with anger instead of logic? What is your deal?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 01:23 PM
2

This is like saying being a CEO isn't fun because you have to know the complete job of everyone underneath you. Motherhood is much better once the kids have grown. Wanting kids makes a woman much stronger than the girl that avoids kids for their own pleasure.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 01:17 PM
–

Because women rejected the other Abrahamic religions, so clearly women must love the way that Islam treats people.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 01:43 PM
1

Why do you think power is still mostly in the hands of men? You can't even put the male perspective into your thoughts without going into a very primal expression of men. Not only do you paint the primal ones as extra primal, but you repaint the ones that fight for the Lord as primal as well. It feels to me like a lot of your qualms with religion come from living in the UK and experiencing the growing tide of Islam. I thought I was clear when I said it, but I'll say it again. Emotional mate guar…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 01:10 PM
5

Proverbs chapter 1 would like a few minutes of your time.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 02:47 AM
4

God calls on us to be discerning, but not cast judgments. That is not to say we can not make our neighbor wary of their sin. Judgment is to be given by the one true God, but guidance can be given by many.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 02:47 AM
1

never said anything about monogamy/polygamy I literally replied to a comment of yours, which implies that "mate-guarding" is still up for interpretation (by who, I wonder?) "Mate-guarding" is quite literally a concept that occurs because of the expectation of a standard of monogamy. The only other time mate-guarding would be mentioned is a physical dispute, which bears more resemblance to something you find in the animal kingdom, the bar, or the school courtyard. The Bible places rules in an eff…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 02:20 AM
1

I really think that throughout all of human history, at least some parents have sat together to talk to their child about sex. It may be a rarity, for sure. You really don't think enlightened families have the ability to sit down as a parental unit to discuss touchy subjects with their children? My assumption is that families of earned affluence would be great communicators and therefore instill that into their children through dialogue. Should I have reason to believe otherwise?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 01:49 AM
1

Can you elaborate more on these men who wrote the Bible? Were they weaker both physically and mentally than others? Were they less attractive? Or was it written by the top dogs? Maybe the cunning, rich men who fell out of the "attractive" ones? They feared the power of the warriors in their army? Or did the strong ones write this to tame the sly rich men? Please enlighten me on these men who wrote the Bible. Also, if you would be so kind as to explain how the Bible does not propose a good soluti…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 01:34 AM
1

In the comment you replied to, I ask you to remove God from your equation of the Bible. In your reply, you start with a hypothetical using God. You suggest the moral of murder should be universal regardless of religion. Why would we not develop a culture that develops a lack of fear towards death and assumes a right to combat? Every person would become more alert mentally and more adept physically. Social groups would become much closer and more tightly connected. Things start to become quite ve…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/23 11:36 PM
2

Because they know the heartache boys face by having to play the role of the pursuer. Also, because they have to remove their image of perfection from their child while explaining their sins of the flesh. "Mommy likes when daddy dicks her down" isn't very easy to tell your child, I'll give you that. Why should it be so easy for daddy to say "I like dicking mommy down"? It's the exact same topic, but for some reason the mother has to hide her lust? The reason they can't formulate the idea of helpi…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/23 10:26 PM
1

Care to elaborate on which ideas I need to work out? I have unveiled devil's advocate reasoning for each point listed. Care to provide a counter to each one and play the advocate for God? I can see the holistic reasoning behind each, but the true reason why those things cause attraction seems pretty accurate with how I described them.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/23 10:15 PM
1

Yes! That's exactly how I would describe a non-player character in a story/game. Sure, they have a story written for them, and they have "lives", but now we're moving into a new discussion of sentient AI. To compare humans directly to non-player characters is to imply their actions feel heavily scripted and fit a specific mold. It implies that you don't need to care for them at all because they think on the level of a bot in a video game. Tl;Dr: NPCs are NPCs. Go play some more video games and b…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/23 10:06 PM
1

The way you try to paint this is funny to me, imo. You're basically speaking red pill ideology. Most of the lost boys start out thinking as you first described while going through puberty and early adulthood. Mostly fed to them by folks in the real world. "Boys will be boys" and other common phrasings and ideas portrayed in movies. It's either through real-world experience or reading about the world that they grow into men, realizing the lives of their other halves. Hence, the red pill and havin…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/23 04:20 PM
3

Another disingenuous take. It's rather funny to me that you choose an ungodly man for your example of religion. "Their morals tell them to not be promiscuous, so of course they're going to be less promiscuous!" You also fail to give us an alternative reason as to why a faithless marriage should turn out better than a marriage without faith. Why would this institution have lasted so long? You suggest it's men justifying their reproductive insecurity, but what of the women that will be severely mi…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/23 03:50 PM
3

What a hilarious, absolutely hilarious take this is. So, as you're suggesting, men should no longer mate guard. Men should quite literally just give up once their woman starts receiving attention from elsewhere. Men from foreign lands? Sure, please fuck our wives. Abusive men from the home land? Sure, please pass the ladies around like meat bags. The neighbor wants a try? Sure! It's only body parts and chemicals! Can you please elaborate on the detriments of monogamy? Can you please provide us w…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/23 01:33 PM
1

be the life of the party dominate other men physically use domination from earlier to take what you want don't mention the dominant traits that drive women wild (act like you hate having to be so masculine) subdue dominance in an effort to win more hearts OR participate in as many conversations as possible via statistics ensure everyone has framed you properly (see: alpha male) Did I get all these correct?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/23 01:15 PM
1

"Just don't be fat" is basically the woman's version of "just be a nice guy" It leaves both genders looking for an alternative answer when they follow this lead to an end. The answer they knew and wanted all along is "make myself visually attractive". Why are women not able to admit to their physical desires???? I really can not comprehend this shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/23 01:09 PM
2

You've verified a red pill truth for me. Women literally can not make the man/men they desire. There is something in their primal brains that prevents them from being honest with men about what they want. They dont want to tell hubby "do these things and act like this" because it kills the vibe for them. Similarly, they don't want to tell the truth to their kids (read: boys). My guess would be that these women start to realize how much they objectify men when trying to create a word salad of com…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/23 12:55 PM
1

You really don't understand the definition of "NPC". It's not a side character in a movie. It's a soulless character in a video game. It's a term literally created to contrast against "player characters" To refer to someone as a "non-player character" means you see them as equivalent to a bot.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/23 04:51 PM
1

How does one acquire more samples other than one at a time? Very disingenuous take you've supplied us with here.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/23 03:07 PM
2

So, if I'm reading this correctly, you already had sex with your current BF, you two split, you got split by the Ex you're now mentioning, then went back to your current BF? Care to elaborate on this story? Who broke up with whom? Can you give us the timeline of your love story?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/23 02:24 PM
1

"She doesn't get the tingles from him until he shows worth!" That's basically all I got from everything you wrote.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/23 02:15 PM
2

"Over men emotionally checking out of a relationship" This one got me good. Again, men can show NO weakness. They cannot shut down AT ALL with an expectation of comfort from their partner. Why? As TRP would say: women like to monkey branch. "My man is just moping around and doing XYZABC all day. Let me talk with others (instead of him) to figure out the problem." So the woman goes and talks to: Other women? They will say he's being a "man child" and needs to "man up" Other men? Will say the same…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/23 02:03 PM
0

Ahhhh, women. Men aren't allowed to say the wrong things, but they're also not allowed to be quiet. What a fucking hilarious take. "Please lead the conversation, our activities, and also fuck me like a dead fish princess!!"
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/23 01:44 PM
1

Wait... you hold the fucking door for NPC's? Do you have any idea what that makes you???? Ahahahahahahahahah Yes, we (men) LITERALLY ABUSE NON PLAYERS WITHOUT SOULS FOR OUR ADVANTAGE AND FUN. You, as proven by your post, treat NPCs (soulless characters) as PEOPLE WITH SOULS!!!! It's really no secret how women start to seem like soulless creatures at certain times now. I'll be using your post as a reference.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/23 01:38 PM
-3

Imagine your home life being so disorganized that you don't have time for mate selection. That's quite literally how I interpreted what you just wrote.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/23 01:23 PM
2

Your essay completely misses his point. Women don't want to be treated like a "bro". You've made that abundantly clear. Men literally objectify EVERYTHING. Including each other. Your claim is that men do not treat others like humans, but the reality is the opposite. Men have both the courage and the courtesy to make these judgments on others. It allows people to improve when they know their strengths and weaknesses. What you desire is for all men to turn off their comparison algorithm. While sim…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/23 01:20 PM
1

Well, the funny thing about this: most working women are ALREADY sitting. You're asking the people pumping your oil and building your infrastructure to take a seat (while seated). Very, very bright of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/22 09:43 PM
3

Hahahahahahahaha men are no longer needed? Ok, go drill your own oil. Lay your own bricks. Pave your own roads. It's absolutely hilarious to hear women talk about modern empowerment when it really only relates to desk jobs. Literally the ONLY reason women are needed is because they make children. If women did not have this, they would be extinct.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/22 09:19 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter